EGFR基因重组T7噬菌体疫苗抗Lewis肺癌的实验研究

本研究中制备了表达表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)部分肽段的基因重组T7噬菌体疫苗,并开展了诱导小鼠产生内源性抗EGFR抗体的实验性抗肿瘤作用研究。由T7噬菌体展示系统将7个经筛选的异种属(人源、鸡源)EGFR膜外区片段展示在其壳体次要头蛋白(P10B)上,用所制备的基因重组噬茵体疫苗免疫小鼠,免疫4W后皮下接种Lewis肺癌细胞,10d后分离瘤体并称重,观察各实验组的抗肿瘤效果。Western Blot检测重组的融合壳蛋白均有EGFR抗原性:高表达EGFR的A431 细胞与免疫3W的小鼠抗血清结合并被荧光二抗标记,流式细胞仪检测法确认有抗EGFR抗体产生;各实验组肿瘤均重统计结果显示,P-CL1-670组、P-cp1-130组、P-cp2-136组、P-cp3-145组、 P-cp4-142组与空白噬菌体组差异性显著。说明表达EGFR的基因重组噬菌体疫苗诱导产生的内源性抗体．在一定程度上抑制了EGFR阳性肿瘤的生长．为诱导型内源性抗EGFR抗体的肿瘤靶向治疗研究开辟了新的途径。     

EGFR基因重组T7噬菌体疫苗抗Lewis肺癌的实验研究

本研究中制备了表达表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）部分肽段的基因重组T7噬菌体疫苗,并开展了诱导小鼠产生内源性抗EGFR抗体的实验性抗肿瘤作用研究。由T7噬菌体展示系统将7个经筛选的异种属（人源、鸡源）EGFR膜外区片段展示在其壳体次要头蛋白（P10B）上,用所制备的基因重组噬菌体疫苗免疫小鼠,免疫4W后皮下接种Lewis肺癌细胞,10d后分离瘤体并称重,观察各实验组的抗肿瘤效果。WesternBlot检测重组的融合壳蛋白均有EGFR抗原性：高表达EGFR的A431细胞与免疫3W的小鼠抗血清结合并被荧光二抗标记．流式细胞仪检测法确认有抗EGFR抗体产生;各实验组肿瘤均重统计结果显示,P—CL1—670组、P—cp1-130组、P—cp2—136组、P—cp3—145组、P—cp4—142组与空白噬菌体组差异性显著。说明表达EGFR的基因重组噬菌体疫苗诱导产生的内源性抗体,在一定程度上抑制了EGFR阳性肿瘤的生长,为诱导型内源性抗EGFR抗体的肿瘤靶向治疗研究开辟了新的途径。     

AN INTRACORPOREAL (ABDOMINAL) LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE [ALVAD], XXX: CLINICAL READINESS AND INITIAL TRIALS IN MAN

The purpose of this report is to present documenting evidence of the clinical readiness of an abdominal left ventricular assist device (ALVAD) according to NHLI criteria,( double dagger ) and the initiation of clinical trials of this device in otherwise irretrievable adult post-cardiotomy patients at the Texas Heart Institute of St. Luke's Episcopal and Texas Children's Hospitals. The ALVAD system has been developed, modified, and improved under NHLI auspices over the last eight years,( double dagger double dagger ) with annual reviews. Over 20,000 hours of in-vivo testing in the calf have been accomplished in our laboratories. The current clinical trials underwent two federal reviews (May 22, 1973 and October 17, 1974) and were the topic of an Ad Hoc Workshop at NHLI on October 28, 1973.( double dagger double dagger double dagger ) More recently, a consecutive series of 26 bovine ALVAD implantations were undertaken; acute and chronic hemodynamic effectiveness with maintenance or augmentation of the systemic circulation during profound ventricular unloading without undue blood trauma, intra-or extra-prosthetic thrombosis, or sepsis was demonstrated; no biomaterials problems were encountered. In-vivo realibility and durability, histologic and pathologic results were detailed, summarized, and submitted to NHLI. Patient acceptability surveys and geometric and volumetric human configuration studies were analyzed. Categorizations of the patients at risk in our institutions and the needs for such a device were documented. The periods of intended use (two weeks-one month), weaning procedures, and the possibility of pump dependence have been discussed. The legal, moral, ethical and informed consent issues were addressed. Clinical protocols (anesthesia, surgical, cardiologic, hematologic, engineering, computerized data-acquisition, follow-up) and cost analyses were developed. The device has now been used in four terminal patients since December, 1975; all subsequently succumbed, but their circulations were temporarily supported during total left ventricular unloading for periods up to eight hours. Continued systematic, controlled clinical investigations of this nature are warranted. A comprehensive listing of pertinent references is included.     

VIEWS OF THE PROCESS AND CONTENT OF ETHICAL REVIEWS OF HIV VACCINE TRIALS AMONG MEMBERS OF US INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS AND SOUTH AFRICAN RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES

Given the ethical controversies concerning HIV vaccine trials (HVTs), we aimed to understand through an exploratory study how members of institutional review boards (IRBs) in the United States (US) and research ethics committees (RECs) in South Africa (SA) view issues concerning the process and content of reviews of these studies. We mailed packets of 20 questionnaires to 12 US IRB chairs and administrators and seven REC chairs to distribute to their members. We received 113 questionnaires (76 from the US and 37 from SA). In both countries, members tended to be white males with advanced academic degrees. Compared to the US, SA members called for ‘major changes’ in HVT protocols more frequently (p = 0.004), and were less likely to think that HVT participants understood risks and benefits (p = 0.033) or informed consent forms (p = 0.000). In both countries, members were divided on several critical issues (e.g. the minimum standard for treatment for HVT participants who became infected during the HVT), but agreed that they needed more training. Of the SA respondents, 40% reported that they were ‘self‐taught’ in ethics. This study, the first we know of to offer quantitative data comparing US vs. non‐US IRBs/RECs, thus suggests key similarities and differences (e.g. compared to SA respondents, US respondents appeared to overestimate participants' understanding of informed consent), along with needs for education. These initial exploratory data in this area have important implications for IRBs, RECs, policy‐makers and scholars concerning future practice, training, policy, and investigations in research ethics, and prevention and treatment of HIV and other diseases in the developing world and elsewhere.