Lipid Raft-Mediated Regulation of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling by Ligands which Influence Receptor Dimerization: A Computational Study

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors; they activate heterotrimeric G-proteins in response to ligand stimulation. Although many GPCRs have been shown to form homo- and/or heterodimers on the cell membrane, the purpose of this dimerization is not known. Recent research has shown that receptor dimerization may have a role in organization of receptors on the cell surface. In addition, microdomains on the cell membrane termed lipid rafts have been shown to play a role in GPCR localization. Using a combination of stochastic (Monte Carlo) and deterministic modeling, we propose a novel mechanism for lipid raft partitioning of GPCRs based on reversible dimerization of receptors and then demonstrate that such localization can affect GPCR signaling. Modeling results are consistent with a variety of experimental data indicating that lipid rafts have a role in amplification or attenuation of G-protein signaling. Thus our work suggests a new mechanism by which dimerization-inducing or inhibiting characteristics of ligands can influence GPCR signaling by controlling receptor organization on the cell membrane.     

Turning receptors on and off with intracellular pepducins: new insights into G-protein-coupled receptor drug development

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of remarkably versatile membrane proteins that are attractive therapeutic targets because of their involvement in a vast range of normal physiological processes and pathological diseases. Upon activation, intracellular domains of GPCRs mediate signaling to G-proteins, but these domains have yet to be effectively exploited as drug targets. Cell-penetrating lipidated peptides called pepducins target specific intracellular loops of GPCRs and have recently emerged as effective allosteric modulators of GPCR activity. The lipid moiety facilitates translocation across the plasma membrane, where pepducins then specifically modulate signaling of their cognate receptor. To date, pepducins and related lipopeptides have been shown to specifically modulate the activity of diverse GPCRs and other membrane proteins, including protease-activated receptors (PAR1, PAR2, and PAR4), chemokine receptors (CXCR1, CXCR2, and CXCR4), sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-3 (S1P3), the melanocortin-4 receptor, the Smoothened receptor, formyl peptide receptor-2 (FPR2), the relaxin receptor (LGR7), G-proteins (Gα(q/11/o/13)), muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and vanilloid (TRPV1) channels, and the GPIIb integrin. This minireview describes recent advances made using pepducin technology in targeting diverse GPCRs and the use of pepducins in identifying potential novel drug targets.     

Selective localization of recognition complexes for leukotriene B4 and formyl-Met-Leu-Phe within lipid raft microdomains of human polymorphonuclear neutrophils

Neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes contain glycosphingolipid- and cholesterol-enriched lipid raft microdomains within the plasma membrane. Although there is evidence that lipid rafts function as signaling platforms for CXCR chemokine receptors, their role in recognition systems for other chemotaxins such as leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and fMLP is unknown. To address this question, human neutrophils were extracted with 1% Brij-58 and fractionated on sucrose gradients. B leukotriene receptor-1 (BLT-1), the primary LTB4 receptor, partitioned to low density fractions, co-isolating with the lipid raft marker, flotillin-1. By contrast, formyl peptide receptor (FPR), the primary fMLP receptor, partitioned to high density fractions, co-isolating with a non-raft marker, Cdc42. This pattern was preserved after the cells were stimulated with LTB4 or fMLP. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was performed to confirm the proximity of BLT-1 and FPR with these markers. FRET was detected between BLT1 and flotillin-1 but not Cdc42, whereas FRET was detected between FPR and Cdc42, but not flotillin-1. Pretreating neutrophils with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a lipid raft-disrupting agent, suppressed intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to LTB4 but had no effect on either of these responses to fMLP. We conclude that BLT-1 is physically located within lipid raft microdomains of human neutrophils and that disrupting lipid raft integrity suppresses LTB4-induced activation. By contrast, FPR is not associated with lipid rafts, and fMLP-induced signaling does not require lipid raft integrity. These findings highlight the complexity of chemotaxin signaling pathways and offer one mechanism by which neutrophils may spatially organize chemotaxin signaling within the plasma membrane.     

Activator of G-protein signaling 1 blocks GIRK channel activation by a G-protein-coupled receptor: apparent disruption of receptor signaling complexes

The Ras-related protein, activator of G-protein signaling 1 (AGS1) or Dexras1, interacts with G(i)/G(o)alpha and activates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling systems independent of a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). As an initial approach to further define the cellular role of AGS1 in GPCR signaling, we determined the influence of AGS1 on the regulation of G(betagamma)-regulated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel (GIRK) current (I(ACh)) by M(2)-muscarinic receptor (M(2)-MR) in Xenopus oocytes. AGS1 expression inhibited receptor-mediated current activation by >80%. Mutation of a key residue (G31V) within the G(1) domain involved in nucleotide binding for Ras-related proteins eliminated the action of AGS1. The inhibition of I(ACh) was not overcome by increasing concentrations of the muscarinic agonist acetylcholine but was progressively lost upon injection of increasing amounts of M(2)-MR cRNA. These data suggest that AGS1 may antagonize GPCR signaling by altering the pool of heterotrimeric G-proteins available for receptor coupling and/or disruption of a preformed signaling complex. Such regulation would be of particular importance for those receptors that exist precoupled to heterotrimeric G-protein and for receptors operating within signaling complexes.     

Lipid rafts facilitate the interaction of PECAM-1 with the glycoprotein VI-FcR gamma-chain complex in human platelets

Glycoprotein (GP) VI, the main signaling receptor for collagen on platelets, is expressed in complex with the FcR gamma-chain. The latter contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif, which becomes phosphorylated, initiating a signaling cascade leading to the rapid activation and aggregation of platelets. Previous studies have shown that signaling by immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-containing receptors is counteracted by signals from receptors with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs. Here we show, by immunoprecipitation, that the GPVI-FcR gamma-chain complex associates with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-containing receptor, PECAM-1. In platelets stimulated with collagen-related peptide (CRP-XL), tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 precedes that of the FcR gamma-chain, implying direct regulation of the former. The GPVI-FcR gamma-chain complex and PECAM-1 were present in both lipid raft and soluble fractions in human platelets; this distribution was unaltered by activation with CRP-XL. Their association occurred in lipid rafts and was lost after lipid raft depletion using methyl-beta-cyclodextrin. We propose that lipid raft clustering facilitates the interaction of PECAM-1 with the GPVI-FcR gamma-chain complex, leading to the down-regulation of the latter.     

Leukocyte-endothelium interaction promotes SDF-1-dependent polarization of CXCR4

Chemokine-driven migration is accompanied by polarization of the cell body and of the intracellular signaling machinery. The extent to which chemokine receptors polarize during chemotaxis is currently unclear. To analyze the distribution of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 during SDF-1 (CXCL12)-induced chemotaxis, we retrovirally expressed a CXCR4-GFP fusion protein in the CXCR4-deficient human hematopoietic progenitor cell line KG1a. This KG1a CXCR4-GFP cell line showed full restoration of SDF-1 responsiveness in assays detecting activation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation, actin polymerization, adhesion to endothelium under conditions of physiological flow, and (transendothelial) chemotaxis. When adhered to cytokine-activated endothelium in the absence of SDF-1, CXCR4 did not localize to the leading edge of the cell but was uniformly distributed over the plasma membrane. In contrast, when SDF-1 was immobilized on cytokine-activated endothelium, the CXCR4-GFP receptors that were present on the cell surface markedly redistributed to the leading edge of migrating cells. In addition, CXCR4-GFP co-localized with lipid rafts in the leading edge of SDF-1-stimulated cells, at the sites of contact with the endothelial surface. Inhibition of lipid raft formation prevents SDF-1-dependent migration, internalization of CXCR4, and polarization to the leading edge of CXCR4, indicating that CXCR4 surface expression and signaling requires lipid rafts. These data show that SDF-1, immobilized on activated human endothelium, induces polarization of CXCR4 to the leading edge of migrating cells, revealing co-operativity between chemokine and substrate in the control of cell migration.     

The peptidomimetic CXCR4 antagonist TC14012 recruits beta-arrestin to CXCR7: roles of receptor domains

CXCR7 is an atypical chemokine receptor that signals through β-arrestin in response to agonists without detectable activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins. Its cognate chemokine ligand CXCL12 also binds CXCR4, a chemokine receptor of considerable clinical interest. Here we report that TC14012, a peptidomimetic inverse agonist of CXCR4, is an agonist on CXCR7. The potency of β-arrestin recruitment to CXCR7 by TC14012 is much higher than that of the previously reported CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 and differs only by one log from that of the natural ligand CXCL12 (EC(50) 350 nM for TC14012, as compared with 30 nM for CXCL12 and 140 μM for AMD3100). Moreover, like CXCL12, TC14012 leads to Erk 1/2 activation in U373 glioma cells that express only CXCR7, but not CXCR4. Given that with TC14012 and AMD3100 two structurally unrelated CXCR4 antagonists turn out to be agonists on CXCR7, this likely reflects differences in the activation mechanism of the arrestin pathway by both receptors. To identify the receptor domain responsible for these opposed effects, we investigated CXCR4 and CXCR7 C terminus-swapping chimeras. Using quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we find that the CXCR7 receptor core formed by the seven-transmembrane domains and the connecting loops determines the agonistic activity of both TC14012 and AMD3100. Moreover, we find that the CXCR7 chimera bearing the CXCR4 C-terminal constitutively associates with arrestin in the absence of ligands. Our data suggest that the CXCR4 and CXCR7 cores share ligand-binding surfaces for the binding of the synthetic ligands, indicating that CXCR4 inhibitors should be tested also on CXCR7.     

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 uses lipid raft-colocalized CD4 and chemokine receptors for productive entry into CD4(+) T cells

In this report, we describe a crucial role of lipid raft-colocalized receptors in the entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into CD4(+) T cells. We show that biochemically isolated detergent-resistant fractions have characteristics of lipid rafts. Lipid raft integrity was required for productive HIV-1 entry as determined by (i) semiquantitative PCR analysis and (ii) single-cycle infectivity assay using HIV-1 expressing the luciferase reporter gene and pseudotyped with HIV-1 HXB2 envelope or vesicular stomatitis virus envelope glycoprotein (VSV-G). Depletion of plasma membrane cholesterol with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MbetaCD) relocalized raft-resident markers to a nonraft environment but did not significantly change the surface expression of HIV-1 receptors. MbetaCD treatment inhibited productive infection of HIV-1 by 95% as determined by luciferase activity in cells infected with HXB2 envelope-pseudotyped virus. In contrast, infection with VSV-G-pseudotyped virus, which enters the cells through an endocytic pathway, was not suppressed. Biochemical fractionation and confocal imaging of HIV-1 receptor distribution in live cells demonstrated that CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 colocalized with raft-resident markers, ganglioside GM1, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored CD48. While confocal microscopy analysis revealed that HIV-1 receptors localized most likely to the same lipid microdomains, sucrose gradient analysis of the receptor localization showed that, in contrast to CD4 and CCR5, CXCR4 was associated preferentially with the nonraft membrane fraction. The binding of HIV-1 envelope gp120 to lipid rafts in the presence, but not in the absence, of cholesterol strongly supports our hypothesis that raft-colocalized receptors are directly involved in virus entry. Dramatic changes in lipid raft and HIV-1 receptor redistribution were observed upon binding of HIV-1 NL4-3 to PM1 T cells. Colocalization of CCR5 with GM1 and gp120 upon engagement of CD4 and CXCR4 by HIV-1 further supports our observation that HIV-1 receptors localize to the same lipid rafts in PM1 T cells.     

High density lipoprotein-induced signaling of the MAPK pathway involves scavenger receptor type BI-mediated activation of Ras

High density lipoprotein (HDL) stimulates multiple signaling pathways. HDL-induced activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway can be mediated by protein kinase C (PKC) and/or pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins. Although HDL-induced activation of MAPK involves Raf-1, Mek, and Erk1/2, the upstream contribution of p21(ras) (Ras) on the activation of Raf-1 and MAPK remains elusive. Here we examine the effect of HDL on Ras activity and demonstrate that HDL induces PKC-independent activation of Ras that is completely blocked by pertussis toxin, thus implicating heterotrimeric G-proteins. In addition, the HDL-induced activation of Ras is inhibited by a neutralizing antibody against scavenger receptor type BI. We conclude that the binding of HDL to scavenger receptor type BI activates Ras in a PKC-independent manner with subsequent induction of the MAPK signaling cascade.     

Receptor-independent activators of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways

Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling systems are activated via cell surface receptors possessing the seven-membrane span motif. Several observations suggest the existence of other modes of stimulus input to heterotrimeric G-proteins. As part of an overall effort to identify such proteins we developed a functional screen based upon the pheromone response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identified two mammalian proteins, AGS2 and AGS3 (activators of G-protein signaling), that activated the pheromone response pathway at the level of heterotrimeric G-proteins in the absence of a typical receptor. beta-galactosidase reporter assays in yeast strains expressing different Galpha subunits (Gpa1, G(s)alpha, G(i)alpha(2(Gpa1(1-41))), G(i)alpha(3(Gpa1(1-41))), Galpha(16(Gpa1(1-41)))) indicated that AGS proteins selectively activated G-protein heterotrimers. AGS3 was only active in the G(i)alpha(2) and G(i)alpha(3) genetic backgrounds, whereas AGS2 was active in each of the genetic backgrounds except Gpa1. In protein interaction studies, AGS2 selectively associated with Gbetagamma, whereas AGS3 bound Galpha and exhibited a preference for GalphaGDP versus GalphaGTPgammaS. Subsequent studies indicated that the mechanisms of G-protein activation by AGS2 and AGS3 were distinct from that of a typical G-protein-coupled receptor. AGS proteins provide unexpected mechanisms for input to heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways. AGS2 and AGS3 may also serve as novel binding partners for Galpha and Gbetagamma that allow the subunits to subserve functions that do not require initial heterotrimer formation.     

Dynamic reorganization of chemokine receptors, cholesterol, lipid rafts, and adhesion molecules to sites of CD4 engagement

T cell polarization and redistribution of cellular components are critical to processes such as activation, migration, and potentially HIV infection. Here, we investigate the effects of CD4 engagement on the redistribution and localization of chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CCR5, adhesion molecules, and lipid raft components including cholesterol, GM1, and glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. We demonstrate that anti-CD4-coated beads (alpha CD4-B) rapidly induce co-capping of chemokine receptors as well as GPI-anchored proteins and adhesion molecules with membrane cholesterol and lipid rafts on human T cell lines and primary T cells to the area of bead-cell contact. This process was dependent on the presence of cellular cholesterol, cytoskeletal reorganization, and lck signaling. Lck-deficient JCaM 1.6 cells failed to cap CXCR4 or lipid rafts to alpha CD4-B. Biochemical analysis reveals that CXCR4 and LFA-1 are recruited to lipid rafts upon CD4 but not CD45 engagement. Furthermore, we also demonstrate T cell capping of both lipid rafts and chemokine receptors at sites of contact with HIV-infected cells, despite the binding of an HIV inhibitory mAb to CXCR4. We conclude that cell surface rearrangements in response to CD4 engagement may serve as a means to enhance cell-to-cell signaling at the immunological synapse and modulate chemokine responsiveness, as well as facilitate HIV entry and expansion by synaptic transmission.     

CXCR4 function requires membrane cholesterol: implications for HIV infection

HIV requires cholesterol and lipid rafts on target cell membranes for infection. To elucidate a possible mechanism, we determined that cholesterol extraction by hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (BCD) inhibits stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha (SDF-1alpha) binding to CXCR4 on T cell lines and PBMCs. Intracellular calcium responses to SDF-1alpha, as well as receptor internalization, were impaired in treated T cells. Loss in ligand binding is likely due to conformational changes in CXCR4 and not increased sensitivity to internalization. SDF-1alpha binding and calcium responses were effectively restored by reloading cholesterol. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that SDF-1alpha binding occurred in lipid raft microdomains that contained GM1. CXCR4 surface expression, on the other hand, only partially colocalized with GM1. HIV-1(IIIB) infection assays confirmed the functional loss of CXCR4 in the cell lines tested, Sup-T1 and CEM-NKR-CCR5. These data suggest that cholesterol is essential for CXCR4 conformation and function and that lipid rafts may play a regulatory role in SDF-1alpha signaling.     

Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling in Arabidopsis: Puzzling G-protein-coupled receptor

Seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are commonly used by eukaryotes to sense extracellular signals to switch on cellular responses through the activation of cognate heterotrimeric G-proteins. In Arabidopsis thaliana, GCR2 has been proposed as a GPCR for the plant hormone abscisic acid. On the other hand, biochemical analysis demonstrates that the sole Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit, GPA1, is in the activated state (GTP-bound) by default, suggesting that the heterotrimeric G-proteins may act without any GPCRs.Key words: heterotrimeric G-proteins, GCR2, GPA1, G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), AtRGS1     

The Gbetagamma dimer drives the interaction of heterotrimeric Gi proteins with nonlamellar membrane structures

Heterotrimeric G proteins are peripheral membrane proteins that propagate signals from membrane receptors to regulatory proteins localized in distinct cellular compartments. To facilitate signal amplification, G proteins are in molar excess with respect to G protein-coupled receptors. Because G proteins are capable of translocating from membrane to cytosol, protein-lipid interactions play a crucial role in signal transduction. Here, we studied the binding of heterotrimeric G proteins (Galphabetagamma) to model membranes (liposomes) and that of the entities formed upon receptor-mediated activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma). The model membranes used were composed of defined membrane lipids capable of organizing into either lamellar or nonlamellar (hexagonal H(II)) membrane structures. We demonstrated that although heterotrimeric G(i) proteins and Gbetagamma dimers can bind to lipid bilayers of phosphatidylcholine, their binding to membranes was markedly and significantly enhanced by the presence of nonlamellar phases of phosphatidylethanolamine. Conversely, activated G protein alpha subunits showed an opposite membrane binding behavior with a marked preference for lamellar membranes. These results have important consequences in cell signaling. First, the binding characteristics of the Gbetagamma dimer account for the lipid binding behavior and the cellular localization of heterotrimeric G proteins. Second, the distinct protein-lipid interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins, Gbetagamma dimers, and Galpha subunits with membrane lipids explain, in part, their different cellular mobilizations during signaling upon receptor activation. Finally, their differential interactions with lipids suggest an active role of the membrane lipid secondary structure in the propagation of signals through G protein-coupled receptors.     

CXCL12/CXCR4 transactivates HER2 in lipid rafts of prostate cancer cells and promotes growth of metastatic deposits in bone

Chemokines and their receptors function in migration and homing of cells to target tissues. Recent evidence suggests that cancer cells use a chemokine receptor axis for metastasis formation at secondary sites. Previously, we showed that binding of the chemokine CXCL12 to its receptor CXCR4 mediated signaling events resulting in matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in prostate cancer bone metastasis. A variety of methods, including lipid raft isolation, stable overexpression of CXCR4, cellular adhesion, invasion assays, and the severe combined immunodeficient-human bone tumor growth model were used. We found that (a) CXCR4 and HER2 coexist in lipid rafts of prostate cancer cells; (b) the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis results in transactivation of the HER2 receptor in lipid rafts of prostate cancer cells; (c) Src kinase mediates CXCL12/CXCR4 transactivation of HER2 in prostate cancer cells; (d) a pan-HER inhibitor desensitizes CXCR4-induced transactivation and subsequent matrix metalloproteinase-9 secretion and invasion; (e) lipid raft-disrupting agents inhibited raft-associated CXCL12/CXCR4 transactivation of the HER2 and cellular invasion; (f) overexpression of CXCR4 in prostate cancer cells leads to increased HER2 phosphorylation and migratory properties of prostate cancer cells; and (g) CXCR4 overexpression enhances bone tumor growth and osteolysis. These data suggest that lipid rafts on the cell membrane are the key site for CXCL12/CXCR4-induced HER2 receptor transactivation. This transactivation contributes to enhanced invasive signals and metastatic growth in the bone microenvironment.     

Label-free impedance responses of endogenous and synthetic chemokine receptor CXCR3 agonists correlate with Gi-protein pathway activation

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is a G-protein-coupled receptor that signals through the Gα(i) class of heterotrimeric G-proteins. CXCR3 is highly expressed on activated T cells and has been proposed to be a therapeutic target in autoimmune disease. CXCR3 is activated by the chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11. CXCR3 signaling properties in response to CXCL10, CXCL11 and the synthetic agonist VUF10661 have previously been evaluated using conventional endpoint assays. In the present study, label-free impedance measurements were used to characterize holistic responses of CXCR3-expressing cells to stimulation with chemokines and VUF10661 in real time and to compare these responses with both G-protein and non-G-protein (β-arrestin2) mediated responses. Differences in response kinetics were apparent between the chemokines and VUF10661. Moreover, CXCR3-independent effects could be distinguished from CXCR3-specific responses with the use of the selective CXCR3 antagonist NBI-74330 and the Gα(i) inhibitor pertussis toxin. By comparing the various responses, we observed that CXCL9 is a biased CXCR3 agonist, stimulating solely G-protein-dependent pathways. Moreover, CXCR3-mediated changes in cellular impedance correlated with G-protein signaling, but not β-arrestin2 recruitment.     

Regulators of G-protein signaling form a quaternary complex with the agonist, receptor, and G-protein. A novel explanation for the acceleration of signaling activation kinetics

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate signaling through heterotrimeric G-proteins. They act to enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit but paradoxically have also been shown to enhance receptor-stimulated activation. To study this paradox, we used a G-protein gated K+ channel to report the dynamics of the G-protein cycle and fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques with cyan and yellow fluorescent protein-tagged proteins to report physical interaction. Our data show that the acceleration of the activation kinetics is dissociated from deactivation kinetics and dependent on receptor and RGS type, G-protein isoform, and RGS expression levels. By using fluorescently tagged proteins, fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy showed a stable physical interaction between the G-protein alpha subunit and RGS (RGS8 and RGS7) that is independent of the functional state of the G-protein. RGS8 does not directly interact with G-protein-coupled receptors. Our data show participation of the RGS in the ternary complex between agonist-receptor and G-protein to form a "quaternary complex." Thus we propose a novel model for the action of RGS proteins in the G-protein cycle in which the RGS protein appears to enhance the "kinetic efficacy" of the ternary complex, by direct association with the G-protein alpha subunit.     

RACK1 regulates specific functions of Gbetagamma

We showed previously that Gbetagamma interacts with Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1 (RACK1), a protein that not only binds activated protein kinase C (PKC) but also serves as an adaptor/scaffold for many signaling pathways. Here we report that RACK1 does not interact with Galpha subunits or heterotrimeric G proteins but binds free Gbetagamma subunits released from activated heterotrimeric G proteins following the activation of their cognate receptors in vivo. The association with Gbetagamma promotes the translocation of RACK1 from the cytosol to the membrane. Moreover, binding of RACK1 to Gbetagamma results in inhibition of Gbetagamma-mediated activation of phospholipase C beta2 and adenylyl cyclase II. However, RACK1 has no effect on other functions of Gbetagamma, such as activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway or chemotaxis of HEK293 cells via the chemokine receptor CXCR2. Similarly, RACK1 does not affect signal transduction through the Galpha subunits of G(i), G(s), or G(q). Collectively, these findings suggest a role of RACK1 in regulating specific functions of Gbetagamma.     

Wnt signaling and heterotrimeric G-proteins: strange bedfellows or a classic romance?

Wnts are secreted ligands with diverse roles in animal development. Wnts bind to cell surface membrane proteins termed Frizzleds. Molecular cloning of members of the Frizzled family revealed hydropathy plots with seven putative, transmembrane-spanning regions, conserved in Frizzleds characterized in mice, humans, flies, and worms. Understanding how Frizzled translates binding of their cognate Wnts into intracellular signals controlling aspects of development has been an elusive goal. Earlier observations gathered from a variety of model systems provided compelling, but indirect, support that the Frizzled receptors may be members of the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors that possess seven transmembrane-spanning domains. Search for a linkage between Frizzled and possible downstream heterotrimeric G-proteins has been advanced by the use of bacterial toxins, antisense DNA, and novel chimeric receptor constructs. New data establish that Frizzleds are indeed bona fide G-protein-coupled receptors. Frizzled-1 couples via G-proteins Go and Gq to the canonical beta-catenin-Lef-Tcf pathway. Frizzled-2 couples via Gq and Gt to downstream effectors including calcium mobilization. Frizzleds and G-proteins might once have been considered strange bedfellows, not likely partners in signaling. The new data, consistent with the properties known for virtually all members of the G-protein-coupled receptors, reveal a more classic romance of signaling elements controlling aspects of early development.     

Differential regulation of TNF-R1 signaling: lipid raft dependency of p42mapk/erk2 activation, but not NF-kappaB activation

The TNFR, TNF-R1, is localized to lipid raft and nonraft regions of the plasma membrane. Ligand binding sets in motion signaling cascades that promote the activation of p42(mapk/erk2) and NF-kappaB. However, the role of receptor localization in the activation of downstream signaling events is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the dynamics of TNF-R1 localization to lipid rafts and the consequences of raft localization on the activation of p42(mapk/erk2) and NF-kappaB in primary cultures of mouse macrophages. Using sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation and a sensitive ELISA to detect TNF-R1, we show that TNF-R1 is rapidly and transiently recruited to lipid rafts in response to TNF-alpha. Disruption of lipid rafts by cholesterol depletion prevented the TNF-alpha-dependent recruitment of TNF-R1 to lipid rafts and inhibited the activation of p42(mapk/erk2), while the activation of NF-kappaB was unaffected. In addition, phosphorylated p42(mapk/erk2), but not receptor interacting protein, I-kappaB kinase-gamma, or I-kappaBalpha was detected in raft-containing fractions following TNF-alpha stimulation. These findings suggest that TNF-R1 is localized to both lipid raft and nonraft regions of the plasma membrane and that each compartment is capable of initiating different signaling responses. We propose that segregation of TNF-R1 to raft and nonraft regions of the plasma membrane contributes to the diversity of signaling responses initiated by TNF-R1.