The role of multiple drug resistance proteins in fetal and/or placental protection against teratogen-induced orofacial clefting

Previous studies have shown a role for multiple drug resistance proteins in protecting the fetus from a limited number of teratogens. We have expanded the number of proteins and teratogens examined by comparing the influence of the mdr1a and mdr2 proteins on teratogen-induced orofacial clefting using their respective knockouts in crosses with the A/J, high susceptibility strain. Western blots identified the presence of mdr1a and possibly mdr2 in the placenta and fetus. The mdr1a knockout, on its unique genetic background showed lower, similar, and higher incidences of clefting compared to A/J for Dilantin, hydrocortisone (HC), and 6-aminonicotinamide (6-AN), respectively. The mdr2 knockout did not affect 6-AN clefting when compared to A/J. In reciprocal crosses, when corrected for increased spontaneous clefting, maternally inherited A/J susceptibility genes predominated over the effects of the maternal absence of mdr1a (with 6-AN). Unlike mdr1a, which had a direct effect in the fetus as shown by genotyping of affected versus unaffected fetuses, an effect of mdr2 in the fetus was not found. The mdr1a knockout was backcrossed to the A/J inbred strain for 11 generations (congenics) to eliminate genetic background effects. Reciprocal crosses showed no maternal effect from the lack of mdr1a, confirming that mdr1a expression in the fetus, rather than the placenta, protects the fetus from teratogens. Mdr2 seems not to be involved in the protection of the fetus from teratogens.     

Genetic risk factors for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a Mesoamerican population: Evidence for IRF6 and variants at 8q24 and 10q25

INTRODUCTION: Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is one of the most common of all birth defects. NSCL/P has a multifactorial etiology that includes both genetic and environmental factors. The IRF6 gene and three further susceptibility loci at 8q24, 10q25, and 17q22, which were identified by a recent genome‐wide association scan (GWAS), are confirmed genetic risk factors for NSCL/P in patients of European descent. METHODS: A case‐control association study was performed to investigate whether these four risk loci contribute to NSCL/P in a Mesoamerican population using four single nucleotide polymorphisms to represent IRF6 and the three novel susceptibility loci. A total of 149 NSCL/P patients and 303 controls of Mayan origin were included. RESULTS: Single marker analysis revealed a significant association between NSCL/P and risk variants in IRF6 and the 8q24 and 10q25 loci. In contrast to previous findings, the association at the 8q24 locus was driven solely by homozygote carriers of the risk allele. This suggests that this locus might act in a recessive manner in the Mayan population. No evidence for association was found at the 17q22 locus. This may have been attributable to the limited power of the sample. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that IRF6 and the 10q25 and 8q24 loci confer a risk for the development of NSCL/P in persons of Mayan origin. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Analysis of susceptibility polymorphisms for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in the Brazilian population

Background : Although genome‐wide association studies have identified several susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) in populations around the world, the role of most loci is unknown in the highly heterogeneous Brazilian population. Methods : To determine the association of 7 markers that showed genome‐wide significant association in Brazilians with NSCL/P, we conducted a structured association study conditioned upon the individual ancestry proportions to evaluate markers at 1p36 (rs742071), 2p21 (rs7590268), 3p11.1 (rs7632427), 8q21.3 (rs12543318), 13q31.1 (rs8001641), 15q22.2 (rs1873147), and 17q22 (rs227731) in 505 patients with NSCL/P and 594 healthy controls recruited from 2 different geographical regions of Brazil. The polymorphisms were genotyped by TaqMan 5′‐exonuclease allelic discrimination assay, and each sample was independently typed for 40 biallelic short insertion/deletion markers to characterize the genomic ancestry. Results : After Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, significant associations with NSCL/P were observed for rs742071, rs1873147, and rs227731. However, the frequency of the risk alleles varied between the geographical regions, according to the proportions of European and African genomic ancestry. The group enriched by European ancestry showed significant association with rs227731 (p = 0.001), whereas the group with high African ancestry was significantly associated with rs1873147 polymorphism (p = 0.005). The significant association with rs742071 was only detected in the combined sample (p = 0.005). Conclusion : The findings of the present study revealed the associations of 1p36 (rs742071), 15q22 (rs1873147), and 17p22 (rs227731) with NSCL/P in the Brazilian population, and further confirmed that the genetic heterogeneity of NSCL/P may be related to the different ethnic background of the affected individuals. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 100:36–42, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The CRISPLD2 gene is involved in cleft lip and/or cleft palate in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or cleft palate (NSCLP) are common congenital anomalies in humans, the etiologies of which are complex and associated with both genetic and environmental factors. Previous data suggested single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of rs1546124, rs4783099, and rs16974880 of the CRISPLD2 gene were associated with an increased risk of NSCLP; however, subsequent studies have yielded conflicting results. This study aims to evaluate the associations of the aforementioned polymorphisms with NSCLP in a Northwestern Chinese population. METHODS: Three CRISPLD2 SNPs were genotyped in a case‐control study (n = 907), including 444 NSCLP patients and 463 healthy individuals, using polymerase chain reaction–denaturing high‐performance liquid chromatography (PCR‐DHPLC). RESULTS: The genotype and allele frequencies of rs1546124 (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58–3.34; p = 1 × 10⁻⁵) and rs4783099 (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54–1.00; p = 0.05) were different in NSCLP patients compared with controls. Furthermore, the CC genotype at rs1546124 was associated with increased risk for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P; OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41–3.15; p_correct = 1.5 × 10⁻⁴) and for cleft palate only (CPO; OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.69–5.07; p_correct = 5.4 × 10⁻⁴), whereas the T allele of rs4783099 was associated with decreased risk for CPO. Further gender stratification showed that the statistical association of these two loci is mainly in the male patients, and not in female patients. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the CRISPLD2 gene contributes to the etiology of NSCLP in the Northwestern Chinese population. SNP rs1546124 is significantly related to NSCLP, associated with both CL/P and CPO groups, and SNP rs4783099 is significantly associated with CPO. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Evaluating eight newly identified susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in a Mesoamerican population

Background: Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is among the most frequently occurring congenital malformations worldwide. The number of genetic loci identified as being involved in NSCL/P etiology was recently increased by a large genome‐wide meta‐analysis of European and Asian samples. This meta‐analysis confirmed all six previously recognized genetic susceptibility loci and identified six novel ones. Methods: To investigate which of these 12 loci contribute to NSCL/P risk in an independent sample of distinct ethnicity, we performed a case–control association analysis in a sample of the Mesoamerican population. A total of 153 individuals with NSCL/P (cases) and 337 unaffected controls were included. Top single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 8 of the 12 loci (1p22.1, 1p36, 2p21, 3p11.1, 8q21.3, 13q31.1, 15q22, and 20q12) were analyzed using mass spectroscopy and restriction‐length‐fragment polymorphism analyses. In a previous study, we had analyzed the remaining four NSCL/P susceptibility regions (IRF6, 8q24, 10q25, and 17q22) in the same sample. Results: Single‐marker association analyses applying allelic, dominant, and recessive models revealed nominal significant associations for four of the eight loci, with two additional loci showing at least a trend of association in the hypothesized direction. Conclusion: In combination with results from our previous study using the same sample, our data suggest that the majority of the known NSCL/P susceptibility regions identified to date also confer risk for this malformation in the Mesoamerican population. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 100:43–47, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

干扰素调节因子-6基因与非综合征性唇腭裂的关系

先天性唇腭裂常分为综合征性唇腭裂和非综合征性唇腭裂两大类,其中非综合征性唇腭裂（nonsyndromic cleft lip with orwithout cleft palate,NSCL/P）约占先天性唇腭裂的70%-80%。国内外学者在对NSCL/P相关基因进行研究后发现,干扰素调节因子6（Interferon Regulatory Factor 6,IRF6）是迄今发现最有价值的并且与NSCL/P致病有相关性的热点基因之一,但是仍有部分学者通过实验研究后得出了相反的结论,故IRF6基因与NSCL/P之间的相关性说法不一,存在较大的争论,究竟前者是通过何种遗传方式作用于后者、仍然不十分清楚,且需要大样本的研究来证实。本文就IRF6基因与NSCL/P的关系做一综述,为研究两者的关系提供系统性参考。     

Mouse genetic models of cleft lip with or without cleft palate

Nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) is among the most common human birth defects. Transmission patterns suggest that the causes are "multifactorial" combinations of genetic and nongenetic factors, mostly distinct from those causing cleft secondary palate (CP). The major etiological factors are largely unknown, and the embryological mechanisms are not well understood. In contrast to CP or neural tube defects (NTD), CLP is uncommon in mouse mutants. Fourteen known mutants or strains express CLP, often as part of a severe syndrome, whereas nonsyndromic CLP is found in two conditional mutants and in two multifactorial models based on a hypomorphic variant with an epigenetic factor. This pattern suggests that human nonsyndromic CLP is likely caused by regulatory and hypomorphic gene variants, and may also involve epigenetics. The developmental pathogenic mechanism varies among mutants and includes deficiencies of growth of the medial, lateral or maxillary facial prominences, defects in the fusion process itself, and shifted midline position of the medial prominences. Several CLP mutants also have NTD, suggesting potential genetic overlap of the traits in humans. The mutants may reflect two interacting sets of genetic signaling pathways: Bmp4, Bmpr1a, Sp8, and Wnt9b may be in one set, and Tcfap2a and Sox11 may be in another. Combining the results of chromosomal linkage studies of unidentified human CLP genes with insights from the mouse models, the following previously unexamined genes are identified as strong candidate genes for causative roles in human nonsyndromic CLP: BMP4, BMPR1B, TFAP2A, SOX4, WNT9B, WNT3, and SP8.     

Genetics of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: is there a Mendelian sub-entity?

The mode of inheritance of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCLP) is still a matter of dispute. We performed segregation analysis on three data sets of families ascertained through an affected child with NSCLP. The first two data sets were selected in France and were pooled for a global analysis. No major gene effect could be evidenced in spite of a very large number of families (666 pedigrees including 719 nuclear families). The third data set was British and consisted of three-generation families including the offspring of probands. A major gene effect, as well as a strong residual multifactorial component, were highly significant and we could show that this evidence almost entirely came from the information on probands' offspring. We conclude that a mixture of monogenic and of multifactorial cases is probably the best explanation for the observations made in this study. Analyses performed in pedigrees with multiple cases closely related might allow reducing heterogeneity and help identifying those Mendelian sub-entities.