Comparison of dose distribution in IMRT and RapidArc technique in prostate radiotherapy

AimThe aim was to provide a dosimetric comparison between IMRT and RapidArc treatment plans with RPI index with simultaneous comparison of the treatment delivery time.BackgroundIMRT and RapidArc provide highly conformal dose distribution with good sparing of normal tissues. However, a complex spatial dosimetry of IMRT and RapidArc plans hampers the evaluation and comparison between plans calculated for the two modalities. RPI was used in this paper for treatment plan comparisons. The duration of the therapeutic session in RapidArc is reported to be shorter in comparison to therapeutic time of the other dynamic techniques. For this reasons, total treatment delivery time in both techniques was compared and discussed.Materials and methods15 patients with prostate carcinoma were randomly selected for the analysis. Two competitive treatment plans using respectively the IMRT and RapidArc techniques were computed for each patient in Eclipse planning system v. 8.6.15. RPIwin^® application was used for RPI calculations for each treatment plan.Additionally, total treatment time was compared between IMRT and RapidArc plans. Total treatment time was a sum of monitor units (MU) for each treated field.ResultsThe mean values of the RPI indices were insignificantly higher for IMRT plans in comparison to rotational therapy. Comparison of the mean numbers of monitor units confirmed that the use of rotational technique instead of conventional static field IMRT can significantly reduce the treatment time.ConclusionAnalysis presented in this paper, demonstrated that RapidArc can compete with the IMRT technique in the field of treatment plan dosimetry reducing the time required for dose delivery.     

Dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation: A feasibility dosimetric study with 4DCT planning and simultaneous integrated boost

PurposeTo evaluate the planning feasibility of dose-escalated total marrow irradiation (TMI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the active bone marrow (ABM) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to assess the impact of using planning organs at risk (OAR) volumes (PRV) accounting for breathing motion in the optimization.MethodsFive patients underwent whole-body CT and thoraco-abdominal 4DCT. A planning target volume (PTV) including all bones and ABM was contoured on each whole-body CT. PRV of selected OAR (liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, spleen, stomach) were determined with 4DCT. Planning consisted of 9–10 full 6 MV photon VMAT arcs. Four plans were created for each patient with 12 Gy prescribed to the PTV, with or without an additional 4 Gy SIB to the ABM. Planning dose constraints were set on the OAR or on the PRV. Planning objective was a PTV D_mean < 110% of the prescribed dose, a PTV V_110% < 50%, and OAR D_mean ≤ 50–60%.ResultsPTV D_mean < 110% was accomplished for most plans (n = 18/20), while all achieved V_110%<50%. SIB plans succeeded to optimally cover the boost volume (median ABM D_mean = 16.3 Gy) and resulted in similar OAR sparing compared to plans without SIB (median OAR D_mean = 40–54% of the ABM prescribed dose). No statistically significant differences between plans optimized with constraints on OAR or PRV were found.ConclusionsAdding a 4 Gy SIB to the ABM for TMI is feasible with VMAT technique, and results in OAR sparing similar to plans without SIB. Setting dose constraints on PRV does not impair PTV dosimetric parameters.     

Dosimetric evaluation of modern radiation therapy techniques for left breast in deep-inspiration breath-hold

PurposeThe dosimetric differences between four radiation therapy techniques for left sided whole breast irradiation were evaluated side by side in the same patient population.MethodsRadiotherapy treatment plans were retrospectively created with Accuray TomoDirect (TD), Elekta Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (E-VMAT), Varian RapidArc (RA) and Field-in-field (FinF) technique for 20 patients, who had received left breast irradiation during deep-inspiration breath-hold. Dose characteristics of planning target volume and organs at risk were compared.ResultsThe E-VMAT, TD and RA treatment plans had higher target coverage (V95%) than FinF plans (97.7–98.3% vs. 96.6%). The low-dose spillage to contralateral breast and lung was smaller with FinF and TD (mean 0.1 and 0.3 Gy) compared to E-VMAT and RA (mean 0.6 and 0.9 Gy). E-VMAT, RA and TD techniques were more effective than FinF in sparing left anterior descending artery (mean 4.0, 4.2 and 4.7 Gy vs. 6.1 Gy, respectively).ConclusionsIn whole breast irradiation TD, E-VMAT and RA plans generated in this study achieved higher dose coverage and sparing of organs from the high dose in the vicinity of the PTV. The advantage of calculated FinF plans is the lowest dose on contralateral organs. The choice of the technique used should be weighted by each institution taking into account the dose characteristics of each technique and its fit with patient anatomy bearing in mind the increased workload of using modulated techniques and the increased beam on time.     

Evaluation of plan quality improvements in PlanIQ-guided Autoplanning

AimPhilips recently integrated PlanIQ with Autoplan® in Pinnacle³ TPS (V16.2). The objective of the present work is to quantitatively demonstrate how this integration improves the plan quality.BackgroundPinnacle³ Autoplan® is the tool that generates the treatment plans with clinically acceptable plan quality with less manual intervention. In the recent past, a new tool called PlanIQ (Sun Nuclear Corp.) was introduced for a priori estimation of the best possible sparing of an organ at risk (OAR) for a given patient anatomy. Philips has recently integrated PlanIQ tool with Autoplan® for a seamless and efficient planning workflow.Materials and methodsWe have performed this evaluation in Pinnacle³ TPS (V.16.2) for the VMAT treatment technique. All plans were created using Varian True beam machine with the dual arc technique. Basically, we created two sets of VMAT plans using 6 MV photons. In the first set of VMAT plans (AP_RTOG), we used OAR goals from either RTOG guidelines to perform optimization using Autoplan®. Subsequently, we exported the same dataset to the PlanIQ system to perform feasibility analysis on the OAR goals. These newly obtained OAR goals from PlanIQ were used to generate the other set of plans (AP_PlanIQ plans). We compared the dosimetric results from these two sets of plans in five cases, such as brain, head & neck, lung, abdomen and prostate.ResultsWe compared the dosimetric results for AP_RTOG and AP_PlanIQ plans. We used RTOG guidelines to evaluate the plans and observed that while both sets of plans were meeting the RTOG guidelines in terms of OAR sparing, the AP_PlanIQ plans were significantly better in terms of OAR sparing as compared to AP_RTOG plans without any compromise in the target coverage.ConclusionThe results indicate that, although Autoplan helps achieve the user-defined goals without much manual intervention, the plan quality (OAR sparing) can be significantly improved without taking many iterative steps when PlanIQ suggested clinical goals are used in the Autoplan-based optimization.Advances in knowledgeAt present, there are no published material available about the efficacy of the integration of PlanIQ with Autoplanning®. In the present work, our objective is to evaluate the improvements in plan quality resulting from this integration.     

Clinical implications of different calculation algorithms in breast radiotherapy: A comparison between pencil beam and collapsed cone convolution

BackgroundThis investigation focused on the clinical implications of the use of the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CCC) in breast radiotherapy and investigated the dosimetric differences as respect to Pencil Beam Convolution algorithm (PBC).Material and methods15 breast treatment plans produced using the PBC algorithm were re-calculated using the CCC algorithm with the same MUs. In a second step, plans were re-optimized using CCC algorithm with modification of wedges and beam weightings to achieve optimal coverage (CCCr plans). For each patient, dosimetric comparison was performed using the standard tangential technique (SWT) and a forward-planned IMRT technique (f-IMRT).ResultsThe CCC algorithm showed significant increased dose inhomogeneity. Mean and minimum PTV doses decreased by 1.4% and 2.8% (both techniques). Mean V95% decreased to 83.7% and 90.3%, respectively for the SWT and f-IMRT. V95% was correlated to the ratio of PTV and lung volumes into the treatment field. The re-optimized CCCr plans achieved similar target coverage, but high-dose volume was significantly larger (V107%: 7.6% vs 2.3% (SWT), 7.1% vs 2.1% (f-IMRT). There was a significantly increase in the ipsilateral lung volume receiving low doses (V5 Gy: 31.3% vs 26.2% in SWT, 27.0% vs 23.0% in f-IMRT). MUs needed for PTV coverage in CCCr plans were higher by 3%.ConclusionsThe PBC algorithm overestimated PTV coverage in terms of all important dosimetric metrics. If previous clinical experience are based on the use of PBC model, especially needed is discussion between medical physicists and radiation oncologists to fully understand the dosimetric changes.     

A study on conventional IMRT and RapidArc treatment planning techniques for head and neck cancers

AimTo evaluate the performance of volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc against conventional IMRT for head and neck cancers.BackgroundRapidArc is a novel technique that has recently been made available for clinical use. Planning study was done for volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc against conventional IMRT for head and neck cancers.Materials and methodsTen patients with advanced tumors of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were selected for the planning comparison study. PTV was delineated for two different dose levels and planning was done by means of simultaneously integrated boost technique. A total dose of 70 Gy was delivered to the boost volume (PTV boost) and 57.7 Gy to the elective PTV (PTV elective) in 35 equal treatment fractions. PTV boost consisted of the gross tumor volume and lymph nodes containing visible macroscopic tumor or biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes, whereas the PTV elective consisted of elective nodal regions. Planning was done for IMRT using 9 fields and RapidArc with single arc, double arc. Beam was equally placed for IMRT plans. Single arc RapidArc plan utilizes full 360° gantry rotation and double arc consists of 2 co-planar arcs of 360° in clockwise and counter clockwise direction. Collimator was rotated from 35 to 45° to cover the entire tumor, which reduced the tongue and groove effect during gantry rotation. All plans were generated with 6 MV X-rays for CLINAC 2100 Linear Accelerator. Calculations were done in the Eclipse treatment planning system (version 8.6) using the AAA algorithm.ResultsDouble arc plans show superior dose homogeneity in PTV compared to a single arc and IMRT 9 field technique. Target coverage was almost similar in all the techniques. The sparing of spinal cord in terms of the maximum dose was better in the double arc technique by 4.5% when compared to the IMRT 9 field and single arc techniques. For healthy tissue, no significant changes were observed between the plans in terms of the mean dose and integral dose. But RapidArc plans showed a reduction in the volume of the healthy tissue irradiated at V_15 Gy (5.81% for single arc and 4.69% for double arc) and V_20 Gy (7.55% for single arc and 5.89% for double arc) dose levels when compared to the 9-Field IMRT technique. For brain stem, maximum dose was similar in all the techniques. The average MU (±SD) needed to deliver the dose of 200 cGy per fraction was 474 ± 80 MU and 447 ± 45 MU for double arc and single arc as against 948 ± 162 MU for the 9-Field IMRT plan. A considerable reduction in maximum dose to the mandible by 6.05% was observed with double arc plan. Double arc shows a reduction in the parotid mean dose when compared with single arc and IMRT plans.ConclusionRapidArc using double arc provided a significant sparing of OARs and healthy tissue without compromising target coverage compared to IMRT. The main disadvantage with IMRT observed was higher monitor units and longer treatment time.     

Dosimetric study of Hounsfield number correction effect in areas influenced by contrast product in lungs case

BackgroundThe aim of the study was dosimetric effect quantification of exclusive computed tomography (CT) use with an intravenous (IV) contrast agent (CA ), on dose distribution of 3D-CRT treatment plans for lung cancer. Furthermore, dosimetric advantage investigation of manually contrast-enhanced region overriding, especially the heart.Materials and methodsTen patients with lung cancer were considered. For each patient two planning CT sets were initially taken with and without CA. Treatment planning were optimized based on CT scans without CA. All plans were copied and recomputed on scans with CA. In addition, scans with IV contrast were copied and density correction was performed for heart contrast enhanced. Same plans were copied and replaced to undo dose calculation errors that may be caused by CA. Eventually, dosimetric evaluations based on dose volume histograms (DVHs) of planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at-risk were studied and analyzed using the Wilcoxon’s signed rank test.ResultsThere is no statistically significant difference in dose calculation for the PTV maximum, mean, minimum doses, spinal cord maximum doses and lung volumes that received 20 and 30 Gy, between planes calculated with and without contrast scans (p > 0.05) and also for contrast scan, with manual regions overriding.ConclusionsDose difference caused by the contrast agent is negligible and not significant. Therefore, there is no justification to perform two scans, and using an IV contrast enhanced scan for dose calculation is sufficient.     

Application of IMRT in adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the thigh—Preliminary results

Background

Fracture of the femur is the most frequent late complication in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) who receive external beam radiotherapy after limb-sparing surgery.

Aim

To reduce the risk of bone fracture following radiotherapy of STS of the thigh, we minimized the dose to the femur and to surrounding normal tissues by applying intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We report preliminary results of post-surgery IMRT of the thigh in patients with STS in this extremity.

Materials and methods

10 adult patients undergoing post-operative radiotherapy of STS of the thigh were treated using IMRT. Clinical IMRT plans with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and 3-phase three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) were designed to adequately treat the planning target volume and to spare the femur to the largest extent possible. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms were compared.

Results

For either technique, a comparable target coverage was achieved; however, target volume was better covered and critical structures were better spared in IMRT plans. Mean and maximum doses to OAR structures were also significantly reduced in the IMRT plans. On average, the mean dose to the femur in 3D-CRT plans was about two times higher than that in IMRT plans.

Conclusion

Compared with 3D-CRT, the application of IMRT improves the dose distribution within the concave target volumes and reduces dose to the OAR structures without compromising target coverage.     

Is IMAT the ultimate evolution of conformal radiotherapy? Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer in a planning study

BackgroundIntensity Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT) can be planned and delivered via several techniques. Advanced Radiotherapy (ARTORL) is a prospective study that aims to evaluate the treatment costs and clinical aspects of implementing these IMAT techniques for head and neck cancers. In this context, we evaluated the potential dosimetric gain of Helical Tomotherapy (TomoTherapy, Accuray, HT) versus VMAT (Rapid'Arc^®, Varian Medical System, RA) for oropharyngeal cancer (OC).Material and methodsThirty patients were selected from our database in whom bilateral neck irradiation and treatment to the primary were indicated. Each patient was planned twice using both HT and RA planning systems using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. For the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk, ICRU 83 reporting guidelines were followed. RA and HT plans were compared using paired Student's t-test.ResultsRA and HT produced plans with a good coverage of PTVs and acceptable sparing of OARs. Although some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, they remained small. However, the near maximal dose to the PRV of spinal cord and brain stem was lower with HT. Regarding normal tissue, HT increased the volume irradiated at doses between 4 and 20 Gy compared to RA.ConclusionIn OC, HT and RA showed similar dosimetric results. They represent the maximum gains obtained with photon beams. The medicoeconomic evaluation of our study is ongoing and may reveal differences between these techniques in terms of MU number, fraction time, and clinical evaluation.     

Feasibility and potential advantages using VMAT in SRS metastasis treatments

BackgroundUtilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) has become the technique of choice as opposed to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The aim of this work is to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits in terms of normal tissue (NT) and dose escalation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in SRS metastasis treatment. A VMAT optimization procedure has therefore been developed for internal dose scaling which minimizes planner dependence.Materials and methodsFive patient-plans incorporating treatment with frame-based SRS with dynamic conformal arc technique (DA) were re-planned for VMAT. The lesions selected were between 4–6 cm³. The same geometry used in the DA plans was maintained for the VMAT cases. A VMAT planning procedure was performed attempting to scale the dose in inner auxiliary volumes, and to explore the potential for dose scaling with this technique. Comparison of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were obtained.ResultsVMAT allows a superior NT sparing plus conformity and dose scaling using the auxiliary volumes. The VMAT results were significantly superior in NT sparing, improving both the V₁₀ and V₁₂ values in all cases, with a 2–3 cm³ saving. In addition, VMAT improves the dose coverage D₉₅ by about 0.5 Gy. The objective of dose escalation was achieved with VMAT with an increment of the Dmean and the Dmedian of about 2 Gy.ConclusionsThis work shows a benefit of VMAT in SRS treatment with significant NT sparing. A VMAT optimization procedure, based on auxiliary inner volumes, has been developed, enabling internal dose escalation.     

Dosimetric impact of statistical uncertainty on Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy using Monaco TPS for three different clinical cases

AimTo study the dosimetric impact of statistical uncertainty (SU) per plan on Monte Carlo (MC) calculation in Monaco? treatment planning system (TPS) during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for three different clinical cases.BackgroundDuring MC calculation SU is an important factor to decide dose calculation accuracy and calculation time. It is necessary to evaluate optimal acceptance of SU for quality plan with reduced calculation time.Materials and methodsThree different clinical cases as the lung, larynx, and prostate treated using VMAT technique were chosen. Plans were generated with Monaco? V5.11 TPS with 2% statistical uncertainty. By keeping all other parameters constant, plans were recalculated by varying SU, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%. For plan evaluation, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose coverage to PTV, organ at risk (OAR) dose, normal tissue receiving dose ≥5 Gy and ≥10 Gy, integral dose (NTID), calculation time, gamma pass rate, calculation reproducibility and energy dependency were analyzed.ResultsCI and HI improve as SU increases from 0.5% to 5%. No significant dose difference was observed in dose coverage to PTV, OAR doses, normal tissue receiving dose ≥5 Gy and ≥10 Gy and NTID. Increase of SU showed decrease in calculation time, gamma pass rate and increase in PTV max dose. No dose difference was seen in calculation reproducibility and dependent on energy.ConclusionFor VMAT plans, SU can be accepted from 1% to 3% per plan with reduced calculation time without compromising plan quality and deliverability by accepting variations in point dose within the target.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral whole breast irradiation – A case study

PurposeThe treatment planning of bilateral breast irradiation (BBI) is a challenging task. The overlapping of tangential fields is usually unavoidable without compromising the target coverage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and benefits of a single isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in BBI.Methods and materialsTwo women with bilateral breast cancer were included in this case study. The first patient (Pat#1) underwent a bilateral breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The second patient (Pat#2) underwent a bilateral ablation and axillary lymph node dissection. Planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk were delineated on CT images. VMAT plans were created with four (two for both sides, Pat#1) or two (one for each breast, Pat#2) separate VMAT fields. Subsequently, traditional tangential field plans were generated for each patient and the dosimetric parameters were compared.ResultsThe treatment times of the patients with VMAT were less than 15 min with daily CBCT imaging. When compared to the standard tangential field technique, the VMAT plans improved the PTV dose coverage and dose homogeneity with improved sparing of lungs and heart. With traditional field arrangement, the overlapping of the tangential fields was inevitable without significantly compromising the target coverage, whereas with VMAT the hotspots were avoided. The patients were treated with the VMAT technique and no acute skin toxicity was observed with either of the patients.ConclusionsA single isocentre VMAT technique has been implemented clinically for BBI. With the VMAT techniques, the dose delivery was quick and the hotspots in the field overlapping areas were avoided. The PTV dose coverage was superior in VMAT plans when compared with conventional tangential technique plans.     

Retrospective review of locally set tolerances for VMAT prostate patient specific QA using the COMPASS® system

PurposeThis study retrospectively reviewed locally set pass rates/tolerances for COMPASS^® pre-treatment quality assurance results for RapidArc prostate plans to determine if these are appropriate. This was performed via quantifying the agreement between treatment planning system calculations and measurements based on absolute dose comparisons (3% tolerance for all dose points) and global gamma index assessment (3%/3 mm criterion for 97% of points).MethodSeventy-three prostate one-arc RapidArc plans, delivered by four dosimetrically matched linacs, were measured using the MatriXX Evolution two-dimensional array and analysed using COMPASS^® (v.3, IBA Dosimetry). For the planning target volumes (PTV) considered, the D_99%, D_50%, D_1% and D_Mean differences were analysed. The percentage volume with gamma greater than 1, average gamma and D_Mean difference were investigated for all structures. Nine plans were also assessed across the linac fleet to investigate potential linac dependence of results.Results and ConclusionsRegarding PTV D_Mean differences, all plans fell within the 3% tolerance and mostly within 2%, although there was a relatively small systematic difference. The absolute percentage differences of average and median doses suggested a weak linac dependence of the results which was found to be clinically insignificant. New stricter tolerances were established both for dose comparisons and gamma evaluation. Correlation between the gamma pass rates and the differences in the D_99%, D_50% and D_1% was found to be moderate suggesting that gamma analysis in isolation has questionable clinical meaning and should only be used to indicate outliers for further analysis.     

Lateral wedge with medial only cardiac shielding (LEMONADE) technique in left chest wall adjuvant radiotherapy

BackgroundThis dosimetric study compared lateral wedge with medial only cardiac shielding (LEMONADE) technique, for left chest wall (LCW) irradiation against three other commonly used techniques.Materials and methodsDosimetric parameters of 22 consecutive LBC patients treated using the P1 (LEMONADE technique) were compared with 3 other virtually reconstructed plans : no cardiac shielding with paired wedges; P2 (paired wedges and medial only Y-direction shielding) and P3 (paired wedges and bilateral Y-direction shielding).ResultsP1 showed better target volume (TV) coverage with the mean 90% isodose coverage of 85.59% ± 5.44 compared to 78.90% ± 8.59 and 74.22% ± 9.50 for P2 and P3, respectively. Compared to no cardiac shielding, for a 4.65% drop in TV coverage the V26Gy of heart dropped from 6.68% to a negligible 0.85% for P1. TV receiving < 30Gy is also significantly lesser for P1 compared to P2 and P3 (5.42% vs 10.64% and 15.8%), whilst there is a small difference of 2.75% between no cardiac shielding and P1.ConclusionWith the improvement in BC survival rate, cardiac toxicity associated with adjuvant irradiation for LBC is a major concern. P1 (LEMONADE) technique has a good compromise between cardiac sparing and target coverage and should suffice for most LCW irradiations. Furthermore, the LEMONADE technique is a simple, reproducible and involves fast planning for cardiac sparing, which is ideal for under-resourced departments with heavy workload.     

Simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for thyroid cancer

Aim

The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of using Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) radiotherapy for thyroid cancer treatment.

Background

At our hospital a 3D Conformal RadioTherapy (3D-CRT) technique involving photon and electron beams for the treatment of thyroid cancer was often used.¹ High dose to the spinal canal was limiting the total dose of such a treatment. After investigation of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) technique involving seven photon beams for first course of treatment³ we decided to examine possibility of reducing treatment fractions by using SIB radiotherapy.

Material and methods

Plans for 10 patients were studied. For each patient, IMRT plan for the first course of treatment (50 Gy for PTV), two plans for the second course of treatment (10 Gy for BOOST) and a SIB plan (50 Gy for PTV, 56 Gy for BOOST) were prepared. For all plans, comparisons of dose statistics for the PTV, BOOST, PTV without BOOST (defined as PTV without BOOST with 1 cm margin), spinal canal and Patient Outline (Body) was done.

Results

Minimum dose for BOOST is higher in the SIB technique than in the two course treatment. PTV without BOOST receives the same average dose in SIB and the 1st course IMRT – 50.10 Gy and 49.84 Gy, respectively. In the SIB technique, higher reduction of dose delivered to the spinal canal is possible (27 Gy compared with 30 Gy).

Conclusion

SIB therapy for thyroid cancer with relation to typical two course treatment is a good proposal of reducing the number of fractions with the same dose for BOOST and PTV without BOOST. Additionally, better sparing of the spinal canal is achieved.     

Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy

Background and purposeHigh dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a clinically used procedure in prostate cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to present the influence of using different optimization algorithms in 3D-CBRT planning on the treatment plan quality.Materials and methodsTreatment plans were calculated for 15 patients – three plans for each patient using: geometrical optimization (GO), inverse optimization (IO) and blind inverse optimization (BIO). For each patient, PTV and OAR volumes, number of needles and geometry of the implant were set equal. Differences between dose distributions were tracked using: D90, V100, V200, Dmax (for prostate); D10, Dmax (for urethra); D10, V100, Dmax (for rectum).ResultsThe analysis of mean values of D90 and V100 in the prostate showed that inverse algorithms gave the best results (mean D90 was 12.1% for BIO and 9.3% for IO better than for GO, mean V100 was 8.2% for BIO and 6.3% for IO better than for GO). From a clinical point of view, GO diminished the doses in the PTV and urethra in all analyzed parameters. The lowest mean doses in the rectum were achieved for plans optimized with IO and BIO (mean D10: 61.2% for GO, 58.1% for IO, 58.0% for BIO; mean Dmax: 92.8% for GO, 85.1% for IO, 83.6% for BIO).ConclusionsApplication of the blind inverse optimization (BIO) algorithm led to clinically best dose parameters for PTV and the rectum. Use of geometrical optimization (GO) led to smaller doses in the urethra, which was however associated with a certain dose decrease also in PTV.     

Dosimetric evaluation of irregular surface compensator and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in breast radiotherapy

BackgroundThis dosimetric study aims to evaluate the dosimetric advantage of the irregular surface compensator (ISC) compared with the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Materials and methodsTen patients with whole breast irradiation were planned with the ISC and IMRT techniques. Six different beam directions were selected for IMRT and ISC plans. The treatment plans were evaluated with respect to planning target coverage, dose homogeneity index (DHI) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing. Monitor units (MUs) and the delivery time were analysed for treatment efficiency.ResultsThe ISC technique provides a better coverage of the PTV and statistically significantly better homogeneity of the dose distribution. For the ipsilateral lung and heart, ISC and IMRT techniques deliver almost the same dose in all plans. However, MU counts and delivery time were significantly lower with the IMRT technique (p < 0.05).ConclusionFor breast radiotherapy, when the ISC method was compared to the IMRT method, ISC provided better dose distribution for the target.