Quorum‐sensing regulation of a capsular polysaccharide receptor for the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent (RcGTA)

The gene transfer agent produced by Rhodobacter capsulatus (RcGTA) resembles a small tailed bacteriophage that packages almost random genomic DNA segments that may be transferred to other R. capsulatus cells. Gene transfer agents are produced by a number of prokaryotes; however, no receptors have been identified. We investigated the RcGTA recipient capability of wild‐type R. capsulatus cells at different culture growth phases, and found that the frequency of RcGTA‐dependent acquisition of an allele increases as cultures enter the stationary phase. We also found that RcGTA adsorption to cells follows a similar trend. RcGTA recipient capability and adsorption were found to be dependent on the GtaR/I quorum‐sensing (QS) system. Production of an extracellular polysaccharide was found to be regulated by GtaR/I QS, as was production of the cell capsule. A number of QS‐regulated putative polysaccharide biosynthesis genes were identified, and mutagenesis of two of these genes, rcc01081 and rcc01932, yielded strains that lack a capsule. Furthermore, these mutants were impaired in RcGTA recipient capability and adsorption, as was a non‐encapsulated wild‐type isolate of R. capsulatus. Overall, our results indicate that capsular polysaccharide is a receptor for the gene transfer agent of R. capsulatus, RcGTA.     

Bacillus subtilis DprA Recruits RecA onto Single-stranded DNA and Mediates Annealing of Complementary Strands Coated by SsbB and SsbA

Naturally transformable bacteria recombine internalized ssDNA with a homologous resident duplex (chromosomal transformation) or complementary internalized ssDNAs (plasmid or viral transformation). Bacillus subtilis competence-induced DprA, RecA, SsbB, and SsbA proteins are involved in the early processing of the internalized ssDNA, with DprA physically interacting with RecA. SsbB and SsbA bind and melt secondary structures in ssDNA but limit RecA loading onto ssDNA. DprA binds to ssDNA and facilitates partial dislodging of both single-stranded binding (SSB) proteins from ssDNA. In the absence of homologous duplex DNA, DprA does not significantly increase RecA nucleation onto protein-free ssDNA. DprA facilitates RecA nucleation and filament extension onto SsbB-coated or SsbB plus SsbA-coated ssDNA. DprA facilitates RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange in the presence of both SSB proteins. DprA, which plays a crucial role in plasmid transformation, anneals complementary strands preferentially coated by SsbB to form duplex circular plasmid molecules. Our results provide a mechanistic framework for conceptualizing the coordinated events modulated by SsbB in concert with SsbA and DprA that are crucial for RecA-dependent chromosomal transformation and RecA-independent plasmid transformation.     

Bacterial transformation: ComFA is a DNA‐dependent ATPase that forms complexes with ComFC and DprA

Pneumococcal natural transformation contributes to genomic plasticity, antibiotic resistance development and vaccine escape. Streptococcus pneumoniae, like many other naturally transformable species, has evolved sophisticated protein machinery for the binding and uptake of DNA. Two proteins encoded by the comF operon, ComFA and ComFC, are involved in transformation but their exact molecular roles remain unknown. In this study, we provide experimental evidence that ComFA binds to single stranded DNA (ssDNA) and has ssDNA‐dependent ATPase activity. We show that both ComFA and ComFC are essential for the transformation process in pneumococci. Moreover, we show that these proteins interact with each other and with other proteins involved in homologous recombination, such as DprA, thus placing the ComFA‐ComFC duo at the interface between DNA uptake and DNA recombination during transformation.     

Roles of Bacillus subtilis DprA and SsbA in RecA-mediated Genetic Recombination

Bacillus subtilis competence-induced RecA, SsbA, SsbB, and DprA are required to internalize and to recombine single-stranded (ss) DNA with homologous resident duplex. RecA, in the ATP·Mg²⁺-bound form (RecA·ATP), can nucleate and form filament onto ssDNA but is inactive to catalyze DNA recombination. We report that SsbA or SsbB bound to ssDNA blocks the RecA filament formation and fails to activate recombination. DprA facilitates RecA filamentation; however, the filaments cannot engage in DNA recombination. When ssDNA was preincubated with SsbA, but not SsbB, DprA was able to activate DNA strand exchange dependent on RecA·ATP. This work demonstrates that RecA·ATP, in concert with SsbA and DprA, catalyzes DNA strand exchange, and SsbB is an accessory factor in the reaction. In contrast, RecA·dATP efficiently catalyzes strand exchange even in the absence of single-stranded binding proteins or DprA, and addition of the accessory factors marginally improved it. We proposed that the RecA-bound nucleotide (ATP and to a lesser extent dATP) might dictate the requirement for accessory factors.     

Molecular determinants of the DprA?RecA interaction for nucleation on ssDNA

Natural transformation is a major mechanism of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria that depends on DNA recombination. RecA is central to the homologous recombination pathway, catalyzing DNA strand invasion and homology search. DprA was shown to be a key binding partner of RecA acting as a specific mediator for its loading on the incoming exogenous ssDNA. Although the 3D structures of both RecA and DprA have been solved, the mechanisms underlying their cross-talk remained elusive. By combining molecular docking simulations and experimental validation, we identified a region on RecA, buried at its self-assembly interface and involving three basic residues that contact an acidic triad of DprA previously shown to be crucial for the interaction. At the core of these patches, ^DprAM238 and ^RecAF230 are involved in the interaction. The other DprA binding regions of RecA could involve the N-terminal α-helix and a DNA-binding region. Our data favor a model of DprA acting as a cap of the RecA filament, involving a DprA−RecA interplay at two levels: their own oligomeric states and their respective interaction with DNA. Our model forms the basis for a mechanistic explanation of how DprA can act as a mediator for the loading of RecA on ssDNA.     

A toolbox for generating single‐stranded DNA in optical tweezers experiments

Essential genomic transactions such as DNA‐damage repair and DNA replication take place on single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) or require specific single‐stranded/double‐stranded DNA (ssDNA/dsDNA) junctions (SDSJ). A significant challenge in single‐molecule studies of DNA–protein interactions using optical trapping is the design and generation of appropriate DNA templates. In contrast to dsDNA, only a limited toolbox is available for the generation of ssDNA constructs for optical tweezers experiments. Here, we present several kinds of DNA templates suitable for single‐molecule experiments requiring segments of ssDNA of several kilobases in length. These different biotinylated dsDNA templates can be tethered between optically trapped microspheres and can, by the subsequent use of force‐induced DNA melting, be converted into partial or complete ssDNA molecules. We systematically investigated the time scale and efficiency of force‐induced melting at different ionic strengths for DNA molecules of different sequences and lengths. Furthermore, we quantified the impact of microspheres of different sizes on the lifetime of ssDNA tethers in optical tweezers experiments. Together, these experiments provide deeper insights into the variables that impact the production of ssDNA for single molecules studies and represent a starting point for further optimization of DNA templates that permit the investigation of protein binding and kinetics on ssDNA. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99:611–620, 2013.     

A label‐free DNAzyme‐cleaving fluorescence method for the determination of trace Pb2+ based on catalysis of AuPd nanoalloy on the reduction of rhodamine 6G

The substrate chain of double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) could be specifically cleaved by Pb²⁺ to release single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) that adsorbs onto the AuPd nanoalloy (AuPdNP) to form a stable AuPdNP–ssDNA complex, but the dsDNA can not protect AuPdNPs in large AuPdNP aggregates (AuPdNPA) under the action of NaCl. AuPdNP–ssDNA and large AuPdNPA could be separated by centrifugation. On increasing the concentration of Pb²⁺, the amount of released ssDNA increased; AuPdNP–ssDNA increased in the centrifugation solution exhibiting a catalytic effect on the slow reaction of rhodamine 6G (Rh6G) and NaH₂PO₂, which led to fluorescence quenching at 552 nm. The decrease in fluorescence intensity (ΔF) was linear to the concentration of Pb²⁺ within the range 0.33–8.00 nmol/L, with a detection limit of 0.21 nmol/L. The proposed method was applied to detect Pb²⁺ in water samples, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Helicobacter pylori DprA alleviates restriction barrier for incoming DNA

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium that colonizes human stomach and causes gastric inflammation. The species is naturally competent and displays remarkable diversity. The presence of a large number of restriction–modification (R–M) systems in this bacterium creates a barrier against natural transformation by foreign DNA. Yet, mechanisms that protect incoming double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) from restriction enzymes are not well understood. A DNA-binding protein, DNA Processing Protein A (DprA) has been shown to facilitate natural transformation of several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by protecting incoming single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and promoting RecA loading on it. However, in this study, we report that H. pylori DprA (HpDprA) binds not only ssDNA but also dsDNA thereby conferring protection to both from various exonucleases and Type II restriction enzymes. Here, we observed a stimulatory role of HpDprA in DNA methylation through physical interaction with methyltransferases. Thus, HpDprA displayed dual functional interaction with H. pylori R–M systems by not only inhibiting the restriction enzymes but also stimulating methyltransferases. These results indicate that HpDprA could be one of the factors that modulate the R–M barrier during inter-strain natural transformation in H. pylori.     

The intrinsically disordered linker of E. coli SSB is critical for the release from single‐stranded DNA

The Escherichia coli single stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is crucial for DNA replication, recombination and repair. Within each process, it has two seemingly disparate roles: it stabilizes single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates generated during DNA processing and, forms complexes with a group of proteins known as the SSB‐interactome. Key to both roles is the C‐terminal, one‐third of the protein, in particular the intrinsically disordered linker (IDL). Previously, they have shown using a series of linker deletion mutants that the IDL links both ssDNA and target protein binding by mediating interactions with the oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide binding fold in the target. In this study, they examine the role of the linker region in SSB function in a variety of DNA metabolic processes in vitro. Using the same linker mutants, the results show that in addition to association reactions (either DNA or protein), the IDL is critical for the release of SSB from DNA. This release can be under conditions of ssDNA competition or active displacement by a DNA helicase or recombinase. Consistent with their previous work these results indicate that SSB linker mutants are defective for SSB–SSB interactions, and when the IDL is removed a terminal SSB–DNA complex results. Formation of this complex inhibits downstream processing of DNA by helicases such as RecG or PriA as well as recombination, mediated by RecA. A model, based on the evidence herein, is presented to explain how the IDL acts in SSB function.     

A partially deficient mutant, recA1730, that fails to form normal nucleoprotein filaments.

Summary The phenotype of the recA1730 mutant is highly dependent on the level of expression of the RecA1730 protein. If the recA1730 gene was expressed from its own promoter, the cells were deficient in recombination and SOS induction. In contrast, when the recA1730 gene was expressed under the control of recAo98, a constitutive operator that increased the RecA1730 concentration 20-fold, cells became proficient in recombination and SOS induction. Likewise, in crude extracts, fivefold more RecA1730 than RecAwt was required to produce full cleavage of LexA protein. The requirement for a high RecA1730 concentration for recombination and LexA cleavage suggests that the recA1730 defect alters a common reaction step. In fact, in vitro data show that the impaired assembly of RecA1730 protein on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) can account for the mutant phenotype. Purified RecA1730 protein was assayed in vitro for ssDNA binding and ATPase activities. RecA1730, like RecAwt, retained ssDNA equally well on nitrocellulose filters; this activity was specifically inhibited by a monoclonal anti-RecA antibody. However, RecA1730 protein did not form complete filaments on ssDNA, as shown by two observations: (i) most of the protein did not elute with ssDNA during gel filtration; and (ii) binding of RecA1730 to ssDNA did not protect it from being digested by DNaseI. RecA1730 hydrolysed ATP in high salt but was defective in ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis. These results strongly suggest that RecA1730 binds to ATP and ssDNA but does not form normal nucleoprotein filaments.Abbreviations RecAwt RecA wind-type protein - ssDNA singlestranded DNA - dsDNA dmble-stranded DNA     

Structural insights into the unique single-stranded DNA-binding mode of Helicobacter pylori DprA

Natural transformation (NT) in bacteria is a complex process, including binding, uptake, transport and recombination of exogenous DNA into the chromosome, consequently generating genetic diversity and driving evolution. DNA processing protein A (DprA), which is distributed among virtually all bacterial species, is involved in binding to the internalized single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and promoting the loading of RecA on ssDNA during NTs. Here we present the structures of DNA_processg_A (DprA) domain of the Helicobacter pylori DprA (HpDprA) and its complex with an ssDNA at 2.20 and 1.80 Å resolutions, respectively. The complex structure revealed for the first time how the conserved DprA domain binds to ssDNA. Based on structural comparisons and binding assays, a unique ssDNA-binding mode is proposed: the dimer of HpDprA binds to ssDNA through two small, positively charged binding pockets of the DprA domains with classical Rossmann folds and the key residue Arg52 is re-oriented to ‘open’ the pocket in order to accommodate one of the bases of ssDNA, thus enabling HpDprA to grasp substrate with high affinity. This mode is consistent with the oligomeric composition of the complex as shown by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and static light scattering measurements, but differs from the direct polymeric complex of Streptococcus pneumoniae DprA–ssDNA.     

Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae relies on DprA- and RecA-dependent protection of incoming DNA single strands

Seventy-five years after the discovery of transformation with Streptococcus pneumoniae, it is remarkable how little we know of the proteins that interact with incoming single strands in the early processing of transforming DNA. In this work, we used as donor DNA in transformation a radioactively labelled homologous fragment to examine the fate of the single-stranded (ssDNA) products of uptake in cells mutant for DprA or RecA, two proteins essential for transformation. Fifteen minutes after uptake, the labelling of specific chromosomal restriction fragments that demonstrated homologous integration in the wild type was not detected in dprA or recA cells, indicating that in the mutants incoming ssDNA could not be processed into recombinants. Investigation of the fate of donor label 1 min after uptake revealed that incoming ssDNA was immediately degraded in the absence of DprA or RecA. Our results demonstrate that incoming ssDNA requires active protection prior to the RecA-driven search for homology and that both DprA and RecA are needed for this protection.     

Genetic recombination in Bacillus subtilis: a division of labor between two single-strand DNA-binding proteins

We have investigated the structural, biochemical and cellular roles of the two single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding proteins from Bacillus subtilis, SsbA and SsbB. During transformation, SsbB localizes at the DNA entry pole where it binds and protects internalized ssDNA. The 2.8-Å resolution structure of SsbB bound to ssDNA reveals a similar overall protein architecture and ssDNA-binding surface to that of Escherichia coli SSB. SsbA, which binds ssDNA with higher affinity than SsbB, co-assembles onto SsbB-coated ssDNA and the two proteins inhibit ssDNA binding by the recombinase RecA. During chromosomal transformation, the RecA mediators RecO and DprA provide RecA access to ssDNA. Interestingly, RecO interaction with ssDNA-bound SsbA helps to dislodge both SsbA and SsbB from the DNA more efficiently than if the DNA is coated only with SsbA. Once RecA is nucleated onto the ssDNA, RecA filament elongation displaces SsbA and SsbB and enables RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange. During plasmid transformation, RecO localizes to the entry pole and catalyzes annealing of SsbA- or SsbA/SsbB-coated complementary ssDNAs to form duplex DNA with ssDNA tails. Our results provide a mechanistic framework for rationalizing the coordinated events modulated by SsbA, SsbB and RecO that are crucial for RecA-dependent chromosomal transformation and RecA-independent plasmid transformation.     

Surface shapes and surrounding environment analysis of single‐ and double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins in protein‐DNA interface

Protein‐DNA bindings are critical to many biological processes. However, the structural mechanisms underlying these interactions are not fully understood. Here, we analyzed the residues shape (peak, flat, or valley) and the surrounding environment of double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (DSBs) and single‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (SSBs) in protein‐DNA interfaces. In the results, we found that the interface shapes, hydrogen bonds, and the surrounding environment present significant differences between the two kinds of proteins. Built on the investigation results, we constructed a random forest (RF) classifier to distinguish DSBs and SSBs with satisfying performance. In conclusion, we present a novel methodology to characterize protein interfaces, which will deepen our understanding of the specificity of proteins binding to ssDNA (single‐stranded DNA) or dsDNA (double‐stranded DNA). Proteins 2016; 84:979–989. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A key presynaptic role in transformation for a widespread bacterial protein: DprA conveys incoming ssDNA to RecA

Natural transformation is a mechanism for genetic exchange in many bacterial genera. It proceeds through the uptake of exogenous DNA and subsequent homology-dependent integration into the genome. In Streptococcus pneumoniae, this integration requires the ubiquitous recombinase, RecA, and DprA, a protein of unknown function widely conserved in bacteria. To unravel the role of DprA, we have studied the properties of the purified S. pneumoniae protein and its Bacillus subtilis ortholog (Smf). We report that DprA and Smf bind cooperatively to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and that these proteins both self-interact and interact with RecA. We demonstrate that DprA-RecA-ssDNA filaments are produced and that these filaments catalyze the homology-dependent formation of joint molecules. Finally, we show that while the Escherichia coli ssDNA-binding protein SSB limits access of RecA to ssDNA, DprA lowers this barrier. We propose that DprA is a new member of the recombination-mediator protein family, dedicated to natural bacterial transformation.     

Reactions of 4‐[Bis(2‐chloroethyl)amino]benzenebutanoic Acid (Chlorambucil) with DNA

4‐[Bis(2‐chloroethyl)amino]benzenebutanoic acid (=chlorambucil, 1 ; 2.5 mM ) was allowed to react with single‐ and double‐stranded calf thymus DNA at physiological pH (cacodylic acid, 50% base) at 37°. The DNA–chlorambucil adducts were identified by analyzing the DNA hydrolysates by NMR, UV, HPLC, LC/ESI‐MS/MS techniques as well as by spiking with authentic materials. ssDNA was more reactive than dsDNA, and the order of reactivity in ssDNA was Ade‐N1>Gua‐N7>Cyt‐N3>Ade‐N3. The most reactive site in dsDNA was Ade‐N3. The Gua‐N7 and Ade‐N3 adducts were hydrolytically labile. Ade‐N7 adduct could not be identified in the hydrolysates of ssDNA or dsDNA. The adduct Gua‐N7,N7, which consists of two units of Gua bound together with a unit derived from chlorambucil, is a cross‐linking adduct, and it was detected in the hydrolysates of ssDNA and dsDNA. Also several other adducts were detected which could be characterized by spiking with previously isolated authentic adducts or tentatively by MS. The role of chlorambucil–DNA adducts on the cytotoxicity and mutagenity of 1 is also discussed.     

Structure and function of a novel endonuclease acting on branched DNA substrates

We show that Pyrococcus abyssi PAB2263 (dubbed NucS (nuc lease for s s DNA) is a novel archaeal endonuclease that interacts with the replication clamp PCNA. Structural determination of P. abyssi NucS revealed a two‐domain dumbbell‐like structure that in overall does not resemble any known protein structure. Biochemical and structural studies indicate that NucS orthologues use a non‐catalytic ssDNA‐binding domain to regulate the cleavage activity at another site, thus resulting into the specific cleavage at double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA)/ssDNA junctions on branched DNA substrates. Both 3′ and 5′ extremities of the ssDNA can be cleaved at the nuclease channel that is too narrow to accommodate duplex DNA. Altogether, our data suggest that NucS proteins constitute a new family of structure‐specific DNA endonucleases that are widely distributed in archaea and in bacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis.     

Deinococcus radiodurans DR1088 is a novel RecF‐interacting protein that stimulates single‐stranded DNA annealing

RecF, together with the recombination mediators RecO and RecR, is required in the RecFOR homologous recombination repair pathway in bacteria. In this study, a recF‐dr1088 operon, which is highly conserved in the Deinococcus‐Thermus phylum, was identified in Deinococcus radiodurans. Interaction between DRRecF and DR1088 was confirmed by yeast two‐hybrid and pull‐down assays. DR1088 exhibited some RecO‐like biochemical properties including single/double‐stranded DNA binding activity, ssDNA binding protein (SSB) replacement ability and ssDNA (with or without SSB) annealing activity. However, unlike other recombination proteins, dr1088 is essential for cell viability. These results indicate that DR1088 might play a role in DNA replication and DNA repair processes.     

5′‐Single‐stranded/duplex DNA junctions are loading sites for E. coli UvrD translocase

Escherichia coli UvrD is a 3′–5′ superfamily 1A helicase/translocase involved in a variety of DNA metabolic processes. UvrD can function either as a helicase or only as an single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) translocase. The switch between these activities is controlled in vitro by the UvrD oligomeric state; a monomer has ssDNA translocase activity, whereas at least a dimer is needed for helicase activity. Although a 3′‐ssDNA partial duplex provides a high‐affinity site for a UvrD monomer, here we show that a monomer also binds with specificity to DNA junctions possessing a 5′‐ssDNA flanking region and can initiate translocation from this site. Thus, a 5′‐ss–duplex DNA junction can serve as a high‐affinity loading site for the monomeric UvrD translocase, whereas a 3′‐ss–duplex DNA junction inhibits both translocase and helicase activity of the UvrD monomer. Furthermore, the 2B subdomain of UvrD is important for this junction specificity. This highlights a separation of helicase and translocase function for UvrD and suggests that a monomeric UvrD translocase can be loaded at a 5′‐ssDNA junction when translocation activity alone is needed.