Fission and fusion in island taxa – serendipity,or something to be expected?

A well‐used metaphor for oceanic islands is that they act as ‘natural laboratories’ for the study of evolution. But how can islands or archipelagos be considered analogues of laboratories for understanding the evolutionary process itself? It is not necessarily the case that just because two or more related species occur on an island or archipelago, somehow, this can help us understand more about their evolutionary history. But in some cases, it can. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Garrick et al. ( 2014 ) use population‐level sampling within closely related taxa of Galapagos giant tortoises to reveal a complex demographic history of the species Chelonoidis becki – a species endemic to Isabela Island, and geographically restricted to Wolf Volcano. Using microsatellite genotyping and mitochondrial DNA sequencing, they provide a strong case for C. becki being derived from C. darwini from the neighbouring island of Santiago. But the interest here is that colonization did not happen only once. Garrick et al. ( 2014 ) reveal C. becki to be the product of a double colonization event, and their data reveal these two founding lineages to be now fusing back into one. Their results are compelling and add to a limited literature describing the evolutionary consequences of double colonization events. Here, we look at the broader implications of the findings of Garrick et al. ( 2014 ) and suggest genomic admixture among multiple founding populations may be a characteristic feature within insular taxa.     

Following the cold: geographical differentiation between interglacial refugia and speciation in the arcto‐alpine species complex Bombus monticola (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Cold‐adapted species are expected to have reached their largest distribution range during a part of the Ice Ages whereas postglacial warming has led to their range contracting toward high‐latitude and high‐altitude areas. This has resulted in an extant allopatric distribution of populations and possibly to trait differentiations (selected or not) or even speciation. Assessing inter‐refugium differentiation or speciation remains challenging for such organisms because of sampling difficulties (several allopatric populations) and disagreements on species concept. In the present study, we assessed postglacial inter‐refugia differentiation and potential speciation among populations of one of the most common arcto‐alpine bumblebee species in European mountains, Bombus monticola Smith, 1849. Based on mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA markers and eco‐chemical traits, we performed integrative taxonomic analysis to evaluate alternative species delimitation hypotheses and to assess geographical differentiation between interglacial refugia and speciation in arcto‐alpine species. Our results show that trait differentiations occurred between most Southern European mountains (i.e. Alps, Balkan, Pyrenees, and Apennines) and Arctic regions. We suggest that the monticola complex actually includes three species: B. konradini   stat.n. status distributed in Italy (Central Apennine mountains), B. monticola with five subspecies, including B. monticola mathildis   ssp.n. distributed in the North Apennine mountains ; and B. lapponicus . Our results support the hypothesis that post‐Ice Age periods can lead to speciation in cold‐adapted species through distribution range contraction. We underline the importance of an integrative taxonomic approach for rigorous species delimitation, and for evolutionary study and conservation of taxonomically challenging taxa.     

Origins of endemic island tortoises in the western Indian Ocean: a critique of the human‐translocation hypothesis

How do organisms arrive on isolated islands, and how do insular evolutionary radiations arise? In a recent paper, Wilmé et al. ( 2016a ) argue that early Austronesians that colonized Madagascar from Southeast Asia translocated giant tortoises to islands in the western Indian Ocean. In the Mascarene Islands, moreover, the human‐translocated tortoises then evolved and radiated in an endemic genus (Cylindraspis). Their proposal ignores the broad, established understanding of the processes leading to the formation of native island biotas, including endemic radiations. We find Wilmé et al.'s suggestion poorly conceived, using a flawed methodology and missing two critical pieces of information: the timing and the specifics of proposed translocations. In response, we here summarize the arguments that could be used to defend the natural origin not only of Indian Ocean giant tortoises but also of scores of insular endemic radiations world‐wide. Reinforcing a generalist's objection, the phylogenetic and ecological data on giant tortoises, and current knowledge of environmental and palaeogeographical history of the Indian Ocean, make Wilmé et al.'s argument even more unlikely.     

Ring species as demonstrations of the continuum of species formation

In the mid‐20th century, Ernst Mayr (1942) and Theodosius Dobzhansky (1958) championed the significance of ‘circular overlaps’ or ‘ring species’ as the perfect demonstration of the gradual nature of species formation. As an ancestral species expands its range, wrapping around a geographic barrier, derived taxa within the ring display interactions typical of populations, such as genetic and morphological intergradation, while overlapping taxa at the terminus of the ring behave largely as sympatric, reproductively isolated species. Are ring species extremely rare or are they just difficult to detect? What conditions favour their formation? Modelling studies have attempted to address these knowledge gaps by estimating the biological parameters that result in stable ring species (Martins et al. 2013), and determining the necessary topographic parameters of the barriers encircled (Monahan et al. 2012). However, any generalization is undermined by a major limitation: only a handful of ring species are known to exist in nature. In addition, many of them have been broken into multiple species presumed to be evolving independently, usually obscuring the evolutionary dynamics that generate diversity. A paper in this issue of Molecular Ecology by Fuchs et al. (2015), focused on the entire genealogy of a bulbul (Alophoixus) species complex, offers key insights into the evolutionary processes underlying diversification of this Indo‐Malayan bird. Their findings fulfil most of the criteria that can be expected for ring species (Fig.  1 ): an ancestor has colonized the mainland from Sundaland, expanded along the forested habitat wrapping around Thailand's lowlands, adjacent taxa intergrade around the ring distribution, and terminal taxa overlap at the ring closure. Although it remains unclear whether ring divergence has resulted in restrictive gene flow relative to that observed around the ring, their results suggest that circular overlaps might be more common in nature than currently recognized in the literature. Most importantly, this work shows that the continuum of species formation that Mayr and Dobzhansky praised in circular overlaps is found in biological systems currently described as ‘rings of species’, in addition to the idealized ‘ring species’.     

Recurrent adaptation in a low‐dispersal trait

The study of natural populations from contrasting environments has greatly enhanced our understanding of ecological‐dependent selection, adaptation and speciation. Cases of parallel evolution in particular have facilitated the study of the molecular and genetic basis of adaptive variation. This includes the type and number of genes underlying adaptive traits, as well as the extent to which these genes are exchanged among populations and contribute repeatedly to parallel evolution. Yet, surprisingly few studies provide a comprehensive view on the evolutionary history of adaptive traits from mutation to widespread adaptation. When did key mutations arise, how did they increase in frequency, and how did they spread? In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Van Belleghem et al. ( 2015 ) reconstruct the evolutionary history of a gene associated with wing size in the salt marsh beetle Pogonus chalceus. Screening the entire distribution range of this species, they found a single origin for the allele associated with the short‐winged ecotype. This allele seemingly evolved in an isolated population and rapidly introgressed into other populations. These findings suggest that the adaptive genetic variation found in sympatric short‐ and long‐winged populations has an allopatric origin, confirming that allopatric phases may be important at early stages of speciation.     

Pathogen pollution and the emergence of a deadly amphibian pathogen

Imagine a single pathogen that is responsible for mass mortality of over a third of an entire vertebrate class. For example, if a single pathogen were causing the death, decline and extinction of 30% of mammal species (including humans), the entire world would be paying attention. This is what has been happening to the world's amphibians – the frogs, toads and salamanders that are affected by the chytrid fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (referred to as Bd), which are consequently declining at an alarming rate. It has aptly been described as the worst pathogen in history in terms of its effects on biodiversity (Kilpatrick et al. 2010). The pathogen was only formally described about 13 years ago (Longcore et al. 1999), and scientists are still in the process of determining where it came from and investigating the question: why now? Healthy debate has ensued as to whether Bd is a globally endemic organism that only recently started causing high mortality due to shifting host responses and/or environmental change (e.g. Pounds et al. 2006) or whether a virulent strain of the pathogen has rapidly disseminated around the world in recent decades, affecting new regions with a vengeance (e.g. Morehouse et al. 2003; Weldon et al. 2004; Lips et al. 2008). We are finally beginning to shed more light on this question, due to significant discoveries that have emerged as a result of intensive DNA‐sequencing methods comparing Bd isolates from different amphibian species across the globe. Evidence is mounting that there is indeed a global panzootic lineage of Bd (BdGPL) in addition to what appear to be more localized endemic strains (Fisher et al. 2009; James et al. 2009; Farrer et al. 2011). Additionally, BdGPL appears to be a hypervirulent strain that has resulted from the hybridization of different Bd strains that came into contact in recent decades, and is now potentially replacing the less‐virulent endemic strains of the pathogen (Farrer et al. 2011). In a new study published in this issue of Molecular Ecology, Schloegel et al. (2012) identify an additional unique Bd lineage that is endemic to the Atlantic Brazilian rainforests (Bd‐Brazil) and provide striking evidence that the Bd‐Brazil lineage has sexually recombined with the BdGPL lineage in an area where the two lineages likely came into contact as a result of classic anthropogenically mediated ‘pathogen pollution’(see below). Fungal pathogens, including Bd, have the propensity to form recombinant lineages when allopatric populations that have not yet formed genetic reproductive barriers are provided with opportunities to intermingle, and virulent strains may be selected for because they tend to be highly transmissible (Fisher et al. 2012). As Schloegel et al. (2012) point out, the demonstrated ability for Bd to undergo meiosis may also mean that it has the capacity to form a resistant spore stage (as yet undiscovered), based on extrapolation from other sexually reproducing chytrids that all have spore stages.     

Taking the discovery approach in integrative taxonomy: decrypting a complex of narrow‐endemic Alpine harvestmen (Opiliones: Phalangiidae: Megabunus)

Species delimitation is fundamental for biological studies, yet precise delimitation is not an easy task, and every involved approach has an inherent failure rate. Integrative taxonomy, a method that merges multiple lines of evidence, can profoundly contribute to reliable alpha‐taxonomy and shed light on the processes behind speciation. In this study, we explored and validated species limits in a group of closely related Megabunus harvestmen (Eupnoi, Phalangiidae) endemic to the European Alps. Without a priori species hypotheses, we used multiple sources of inference, including mitochondrial and multilocus nuclear DNA, morphometrics and chemistry. The results of these discovery approaches revealed morphological crypsis and multiple new species within two of the five hitherto known species. Based on our analyses, we discussed the most plausible evolutionary scenarios, invoked the most reasonable species hypotheses and validated the new species limits. Building upon the achieved rigour, three new species, Megabunus cryptobergomas Muster and Wachter sp. nov., Megabunus coelodonta Muster and Steiner sp. nov., and Megabunus lentipes Muster and Komposch sp. nov., are formally described. In addition, we provide a dichotomous morphological key to the Megabunus species of the Alps. Our work demonstrates the suitability of integrative, discovery‐based approaches in combination with validation approaches to precisely characterize species and enabled us to implement nomenclatural consequences for this genus.     

Genomics of clinal variation in Drosophila: disentangling the interactions of selection and demography

Clines in phenotypes and genotype frequencies across environmental gradients are commonly taken as evidence for spatially varying selection. Classical examples include the latitudinal clines in various species of Drosophila, which often occur in parallel fashion on multiple continents. Today, genomewide analysis of such clinal systems provides a fantastic opportunity for unravelling the genetics of adaptation, yet major challenges remain. A well‐known but often neglected problem is that demographic processes can also generate clinality, independent of or coincident with selection. A closely related issue is how to identify true genic targets of clinal selection. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, three studies illustrate these challenges and how they might be met. Bergland et al. report evidence suggesting that the well‐known parallel latitudinal clines in North American and Australian D. melanogaster are confounded by admixture from Africa and Europe, highlighting the importance of distinguishing demographic from adaptive clines. In a companion study, Machado et al. provide the first genomic comparison of latitudinal differentiation in D. melanogaster and its sister species D. simulans. While D. simulans is less clinal than D. melanogaster, a significant fraction of clinal genes is shared between both species, suggesting the existence of convergent adaptation to clinaly varying selection pressures. Finally, by drawing on several independent sources of evidence, Bo?i?evi? et al. identify a functional network of eight clinal genes that are likely involved in cold adaptation. Together, these studies remind us that clinality does not necessarily imply selection and that separating adaptive signal from demographic noise requires great effort and care.     

Butterfly genomics sheds light on the process of hybrid speciation

How common is hybridization between species and what effect does it have on the evolutionary process? Can hybridization generate new species and what indeed is a species? In this issue, Gompert et al. (2014) show how massive, genome‐scale data sets can be used to shed light on these questions. They focus on the Lycaeides butterflies, and in particular, several populations from the western USA, which have characteristics suggesting that they may contain hybrids of two or more different species (Gompert et al. 2006). They demonstrate that these populations do contain mosaic genomes made up of components from different parental species. However, this appears to have been largely driven by historical admixture, with more recent processes appearing to be isolating the populations from each other. Therefore, these populations are on their way to becoming distinct species (if they are not already) but have arisen following extensive hybridization between other distinct populations or species (Fig.  1 ).

Figure 1 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint There has been extensive historical admixture between Lycaeides species with some new species arising from hybrid populations. (Photo credits: Lauren Lucas, Chris Nice, and James Fordyce).

Their data set must be one of the largest outside of humans, with over one and half thousand butterflies genotyped at over 45 thousand variable nucleotide positions. It is this sheer amount of data that has allowed the researchers to distinguish between historical and more recent evolutionary and demographic processes. This is because it has allowed them to partition the data into common and rare genetic variants and perform separate analyses on these. Common genetic variants are likely to be older while rare variants are more likely to be due to recent mutations. Therefore, by splitting the genetic variation into these components, the researchers were able to show more admixture among common variants, while rare variants showed less admixture and clear separation of the populations. The extensive geographic sampling of individuals, including overlapping distributions of several of the putative species, also allowed the authors to rule out the possibility that the separation of the populations was simply due to geographical distance. The authors have developed a new programme for detecting population structure and admixture, which does the same job as STRUCTURE (Pritchard et al. 2000 ), identifying genetically distinct populations and admixture between these populations, but is designed to be used with next generation sequence data. They use the output of this model for another promising new method to distinguish between contemporary and historical admixtures. They fixed the number of source populations in the model at two and estimated the proportion of each individual's genome coming from these two populations. Therefore, an individual can either be purely population 1, or population 2 or some mixture of the two (they call this value q, the same parameter exists in STRUCTURE). They then compared this to the level of heterozygosity coming from the two source populations in the individual's genome. If an individual is an F1 hybrid of two source populations, then it would have a q of 0.5 and also be heterozygous at all loci that distinguish the parental populations. On the other hand, if it is a member of a stable hybrid lineage, it might also have a q of 0.5 but would not be expected to be heterozygous at these loci, because over time the population would become fixed for one or other of the source population states either by drift or selection (Fig.  2 ). This is indeed what they find in the hybrid populations. They tend to have intermediate q values, but the level of heterozygosity coming from the source populations (which they call Q₁₂) was consistently lower than expected.

Figure 2 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint The Q‐matrix analysis used by Gompert et al. ( 2014 ) to distinguish between contemporary (hybrid swarm) and historical (stable hybrid lineage) admixture.

Overall, the results support several of the populations as being stable hybrid lineages. Nevertheless, the strictest definitions of hybrid species specify that the process of hybridization between the parental species must be instrumental in driving the reproductive isolation of the new species from both parental populations (Abbott et al. 2013 ). This is extremely hard to demonstrate conclusively because it requires us to first of all identify the isolating mechanisms that operated in the early evolution of the species and then to show that these were caused by the hybridization event itself. One advantage of the Lycaeides system is that the species appear to be in the early stages of divergence, so barriers to gene flow that are operating currently are likely to be those that are driving the species divergence. While there is some evidence that hybridization gave rise to traits that allowed the new populations to colonize new environments (Gompert et al. 2006 ; Lucas et al. 2008 ), there is clearly further work to be carried out in this direction. One of the rare examples of homoploid hybrid speciation (hybrid speciation without a change in chromosome number) where the reproductive isolation criterion has been demonstrated, comes from the Heliconius butterflies. In this case, hybridization of two species has been shown to give rise to a new colour pattern that instantly becomes reproductively isolated from the parental species due to mate preference for that pattern (Mavárez et al. 2006 ). However, while this has become a widely accepted example (Abbott et al. 2013 ), the naturally occurring ‘hybrid species’ in fact has derived most of its genome from one of the parental species, with largely just the colour pattern controlling locus coming from the other parent, a process that has been termed ‘hybrid trait speciation’ (Salazar et al. 2010 ). This distinction is an important one in terms of our understanding of the organization of biological diversity. While hybrid trait speciation will still largely fit the model of a neatly branching evolutionary tree, with perhaps only the region surrounding the single introgressed gene deviating from this model, hybrid species that end up with mosaic genomes, like Lycaeides, will not fit this model when considering the genome as a whole. This distinction also more broadly applies when comparing the patterns of divergence between Heliconius and Lycaeides. These two butterfly genera have been driving forward our understanding of the prevalence and importance of hybridization at the genomic level, but they reveal different ways in which hybridization can influence the organization of biological diversity. Recent work in Heliconius has shown that admixture is extensive and has been ongoing over a large portion of the evolutionary history of species (Martin et al. 2013 ; Nadeau et al. 2013 ). Nevertheless, this has not obscured the clear and robust pattern of a bifurcating evolutionary tree when considering the genome as a whole (Nadeau et al. 2013 ). In contrast in Lycaeides, the genome‐wide phylogeny clearly does not fit a bifurcating tree, resembling more of a messy shrub, with hybrid taxa falling at intermediate positions on the phylogeny (Gompert et al. 2014 ). The extent to which we need to rethink the way we describe and organize biological diversity will depend on the relative prevalence of these different outcomes of hybridization. We are likely to see many more of these types of large sequence data sets for ecologically interesting organisms. Gompert et al. ( 2014 ) show that these data need not only be a quantitative advance, but can also qualitatively change our understanding of the evolutionary history of these organisms. In particular, analysing common and rare genetic variants separately may provide information that would otherwise be missed. The emerging field of ‘speciation genomics’ (Seehausen et al. 2014 ) should follow this lead in developing new ways of making the most of the flood of genomic data that is being generated, but also improve methods for integrating this with field observations and experiments to identify the sources and targets of selection and divergence.

References

• Abbott R , Albach D , Ansell S et al. (2013 ) Hybridization and speciation . Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26 , 229 – 246 . Wiley Online Library CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Gompert Z , Fordyce JA , Forister ML , Shapiro AM , Nice CC (2006 ) Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat . Science, 314 , 1923 – 1925 . Crossref CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Gompert Z , Lucas LK , Buerkle CA et al. (2014 ) Admixture and the organization of genetic diversity in a butterfly species complex revealed through common and rare genetic variants . Molecular Ecology, 23 , 4555 – 4573 . Wiley Online Library CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Lucas LK , Fordyce JA , Nice CC (2008 ) Patterns of genitalic morphology around suture zones in North American Lycaeides (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): implications for taxonomy and historical biogeography . Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101 , 172 – 180 . Crossref Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Martin SH , Dasmahapatra KK , Nadeau NJ et al. (2013 ) Genome‐wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies . Genome Research, 23 , 1817 – 1828 . Crossref CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Mavárez J , Salazar CA , Bermingham E et al. (2006 ) Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies . Nature, 441 , 868 – 871 . Crossref CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Nadeau NJ , Martin SH , Kozak KM et al. (2013 ) Genome‐wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation . Molecular Ecology, 22 , 814 – 826 . Wiley Online Library CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK , Stephens M , Donnelly P (2000 ) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data . Genetics, 155 , 945 – 959 . Wiley Online Library CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Salazar C , Baxter SW , Pardo‐Diaz C et al. (2010 ) Genetic evidence for hybrid trait speciation in Heliconius butterflies . PLoS Genetics, 6 , e1000930 . Crossref CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
• Seehausen O , Butlin RK , Keller I et al. (2014 ) Genomics and the origin of species . Nature Reviews Genetics, 15 , 176 – 192 . Crossref CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

This article was written and figures prepared by N.N. except as specified in the text (photo credits).

Citing Literature

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 4

• V. Alex Sotola, David S. Ruppel, Timothy H. Bonner, Chris C. Nice, Noland H. Martin, Asymmetric introgression between fishes in the Red River basin of Texas is associated with variation in water quality, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.4901, 9 , 4, (2083-2095), (2019). Wiley Online Library
• Matej Bocek, Dominik Kusy, Michal Motyka, Ladislav Bocak, Persistence of multiple patterns and intraspecific polymorphism in multi-species Müllerian communities of net-winged beetles, Frontiers in Zoology, 10.1186/s12983-019-0335-8, 16 , 1, (2019). Crossref
• Nicola J. Nadeau, Takeshi Kawakami, Population Genomics of Speciation and Admixture, , 10.1007/13836_2018_24, (2018). Crossref
• Amanda Roe, Julian Dupuis, Felix Sperling, Molecular Dimensions of Insect Taxonomy in the Genomics Era, Insect Biodiversity, 10.1002/9781118945568, (547-573), (2017). Wiley Online Library

Volume 23 , Issue 18 September 2014

Pages 4441-4443     

Next‐generation QTL mapping: crowdsourcing SNPs,without pedigrees

For many molecular ecologists, the mantra and mission of the field of ecological genomics could be encapsulated by the phrase ‘to find the genes that matter’ (Mitchell‐Olds 2001 ; Rockman 2012 ). This phrase of course refers to the early hope and current increasing success in the search for genes whose variation underlies phenotypic variation and fitness in natural populations. In the years since the modern incarnation of the field of ecological genomics, many would agree that the low‐hanging fruit has, at least in principle, been plucked: we now have several elegant examples of genes whose variation influences key adaptive traits in natural populations, and these examples have revealed important insights into the architecture of adaptive variation (Hoekstra et al. 2006 ; Shapiro et al. 2009 ; Chan et al. 2010 ). But how well will these early examples, often involving single genes of large effect on discrete or near‐discrete phenotypes, represent the dynamics of adaptive change for the totality of phenotypes in nature? Will traits exhibiting continuous rather than discrete variation in natural populations have as simple a genetic basis as these early examples suggest (Prasad et al. 2012 ; Rockman 2012 )? Two papers in this issue (Robinson et al. 2013 ; Santure et al. 2013 ) not only suggest answers to these questions but also provide useful extensions of statistical approaches for ecological geneticists to study the genetics of continuous variation in nature. Together these papers, by the same research groups studying evolution in a natural population of Great Tits (Parus major), provide a glimpse of what we should expect as the field begins to dissect the genetic basis of what is arguably the most common type of variation in nature, and how genome‐wide surveys of variation can be applied to natural populations without pedigrees.     

Monkeying around with ploidy

Inferences of whole genome duplication (WGD) events accompany the annotation of every newly sequenced plant genome, but much remains unknown about the evolutionary processes and pathways relating to WGD (Soltis et al. 2010). What ecological, biogeographical and genetic factors cause WGD to occur in nature? How does WGD affect gene expression? How do genomes evolve after WGD? New species that have arisen recently through WGD are good places to seek answers to such questions. These could be relatively common in nature, but reliably demonstrating their recent origin requires documentary evidence, which can be very hard to come by. Thus far, records of species introductions and meticulous botanizing have demonstrated six new natural allopolyploids in just four genera: Tragopogon miscellus and T. mirus, Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis, Spartina anglica and Cardamine schultzii (Abbott & Rieseberg 2012; Ainouche et al. 2009; Soltis & Soltis 2009). It is risky to generalize about a universal feature of plant evolution from such a small sample; more examples are needed, in different genera. It is therefore of considerable interest that Mario Vallejo‐Marin of University of Stirling has this year named a new allopolyploid species of monkey flower, Mimulus peregrinus, and presented evidence that it is <140 years old (Vallejo‐Marin 2012). This discovery is particularly timely as the monkey flower genus is developing rapidly as a model system for ecological genetics (Wu et al. 2008), and in the current issue of Molecular Ecology, Jennifer Modliszewski and John Willis of Duke University present new data showing high genetic diversity in another recently discovered monkey flower allopolyploid, M. sookensis (Modliszewski & Willis 2012).     

Repeatability,ephemerality and inconvenient truths in the speciation process

Everyone appreciates the happy fiction that species conform to the simple theoretical convenience of a single panmictic population. In speciation genetics, a further standard simplification is that it is only those genetic differences that are fixed between diverging populations that need concern us in order to understand the accumulation of intrinsic barriers to reproduction. To a first approximation, of course, both of these assumptions are appropriate and theory based on them provides compelling insights into diverse evolutionary phenomena (Orr & Turelli 2001 ). But what else can we learn about the begetting of biodiversity, speciation, by considering explicitly some less convenient realities of natural populations? Specifically, how does genetic variation at incompatibility loci within a species influence interspecies hybridization upon secondary contact? And, in nature, how repeatable among distinct bouts of secondary contact are the genomic outcomes of hybridization? Mandeville et al. ( 2015 ) tackle exactly this question in their new study in Molecular Ecology on five species of suckers, fish of the genus Catostomus, that overlap sympatrically in different portions of their subdivided ranges that occupy different rivers. They document substantial genomic heterogeneity in realized hybridization in nature, both among species pairs and among the source populations for hybrids of a given species pair. This imperfect repeatability of episodes of hybridization implies greater permeability of species barriers in some parts of their range, with intriguing consequences for how the integrity of species as independently evolving units could be susceptible to collapse.     

Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: Risky hybrid sex by amphibian‐parasitizing chytrids in the Brazilian Atlantic Forests

In their article in this issue of Molecular Ecology, Jenkinson et al. ( 2016 ) and colleagues address a worrying question—how could arguably the most dangerous pathogen known to science, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), become even more virulent? The answer: start having sex. Jenkinson et al. present a case for how the introduction into Brazil of the globally invasive lineage of Bd, BdGPL, has disrupted the relationship between native amphibians and an endemic Bd lineage, BdBrazil. BdBrazil is hypothesized to be native to the Atlantic Forest and so have a long co‐evolutionary history with biodiverse Atlantic Forest amphibian community. The authors suggest that this has resulted in a zone of hybrid Bd genotypes which are potentially more likely to cause fatal chytridiomycosis than either parent lineage. The endemic–nonendemic Bd hybrid genotypes described in this study, and the evidence for pathogen translocation via the global amphibian trade presented, highlights the danger of anthropogenic pathogen dispersal. This research emphasizes that biosecurity regulations may have to refocus on lineages within species if we are to mitigate against the danger of new, possibly hypervirulent genotypes of pathogens emerging as phylogeographic barriers are breached.     

Phenotypic plasticity and divergence in gene expression

The extent to which phenotypic plasticity, or the ability of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in different environments, impedes or promotes genetic divergence has been a matter of debate within evolutionary biology for many decades (see, for example, Ghalambor et al. 2007 ; Pfennig et al. 2010 ). Similarly, the role of evolution in shaping phenotypic plasticity remains poorly understood (Pigliucci 2005 ). In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Dayan et al. ( 2015 ) provide empirical data relevant to these questions by assessing the extent of plasticity and divergence in the expression levels of 2272 genes in muscle tissue from killifish (genus Fundulus) exposed to different temperatures. F. heteroclitus (Fig.  1 A) and F. grandis are minnows that inhabit estuarine marshes (Fig.  1 B) along the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico in North America. These habitats undergo large variations in temperature both daily and seasonally, and these fish are known to demonstrate substantial phenotypic plasticity in response to temperature change (e.g. Fangue et al. 2006 ). Furthermore, the range of F. heteroclitus spans a large latitudinal gradient of temperatures, such that northern populations experience temperatures that are on average ~10°C colder than do southern populations (Schulte 2007 ). By comparing gene expression patterns between populations of these fish from different thermal habitats held in the laboratory at three different temperatures, Dayan et al. ( 2015 ) address two important questions regarding the interacting effects of plasticity and evolution: (i) How does phenotypic plasticity affect adaptive divergence? and (ii) How does adaptive divergence affect plasticity?     

Tracing the recombination and colonization history of hybrid species in space and time

Hybrid speciation has long fascinated evolutionary biologists and laymen alike, presumably because it challenges our classical view of evolution as a ‘one‐way street’ leading to strictly tree‐like patterns of ancestry and descent. Homoploid hybrid speciation (HHS) has been a particularly interesting puzzle, as it appears to occur extremely rapidly, perhaps within less than 50 generations ( McCarthy et al. 1995 ; Buerkle et al. 2000 ). Nevertheless, HHS may sometimes involve extended or repeated periods of recombination and gene exchange between populations subject to strong divergent natural selection ( Buerkle & Rieseberg 2008 ). Thus, HHS provides a highly interesting setting for understanding the drivers and tempo of adaptive divergence and speciation in the face of gene flow ( Arnold 2006 ; Rieseberg & Willis 2007 ; Nolte & Tautz 2009). In the present issue of Molecular Ecology, Wang et al. (2011) explore a particularly challenging issue connected to HHS: they attempt to trace the colonization and recombination history of an ancient (several MYA) hybrid species, from admixture and recombination in the ancestral hybrid zone to subsequent range shifts triggered by tectonic events (uplift of the Tibetan plateau) and climatic shifts (Pleistocene ice ages). This work is important because it addresses key issues related to the origin of the standing genetic variation available for adaptive responses (e.g. to climate change) and speciation in temperate species, which are topics of great current interest ( Rieseberg et al. 2003 ; Barrett & Schluter 2008 ; de Carvalho et al. 2010 ).     

Environmental harshness,latitude and incipient speciation

Are rates of evolution and speciation fastest where diversity is greatest – the tropics? A commonly accepted theory links the latitudinal diversity gradient to a speciation pump model whereby the tropics produce species at a faster rate than extra‐tropical regions. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Botero et al. ( 2014 ) test the speciation pump model using subspecies richness patterns for more than 9000 species of birds and mammals as a proxy for incipient speciation opportunity. Rather than using latitudinal centroids, the authors investigate the role of various environmental correlates of latitude as drivers of subspecies richness. Their key finding points to environmental harshness as a positive predictor of subspecies richness. The authors link high subspecies richness in environmental harsh areas to increased opportunities for geographic range fragmentation and/or faster rates of trait evolution as drivers of incipient speciation. Because environmental harshness generally increases with latitude, these results suggest that opportunity for incipient speciation is lowest where species richness is highest. The authors interpret this finding as incompatible with the view of the tropics as a cradle of diversity. Their results are consistent with a growing body of evidence that reproductive isolation and speciation occur fastest at high latitudes.     

Go forth,evolve and prosper: the genetic basis of adaptive evolution in an invasive species

Invasive species stand accused of a familiar litany of offences, including displacing native species, disrupting ecological processes and causing billions of dollars in ecological damage (Cox 1999 ). Despite these transgressions, invasive species have at least one redeeming virtue – they offer us an unparalleled opportunity to investigate colonization and responses of populations to novel conditions in the invaded habitat (Elton 1958 ; Sakai et al. 2001 ). Invasive species are by definition colonists that have arrived and thrived in a new location. How they are able to thrive is of great interest, especially considering a paradox of invasion (Sax & Brown 2000 ): if many populations are locally adapted (Leimu & Fischer 2008 ), how could species introduced into new locations become so successful? One possibility is that populations adjust to the new conditions through plasticity – increasing production of allelopathic compounds (novel weapons), or taking advantage of new prey, for example. Alternatively, evolution could play a role, with the populations adapting to the novel conditions of the new habitat. There is increasing evidence, based on phenotypic data, for rapid adaptive evolution in invasive species (Franks et al. 2012 ; Colautti & Barrett 2013 ; Sultan et al. 2013 ). Prior studies have also demonstrated genetic changes in introduced populations using neutral markers, which generally do not provide information on adaptation. Thus, the genetic basis of adaptive evolution in invasive species has largely remained unknown. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Vandepitte et al. ( 2014 ) provide some of the first evidence in invasive populations for molecular genetic changes directly linked to adaptation.     

Genetic rescue: a safe or risky bet?

Small and isolated populations face threats from genetic drift and inbreeding. To rescue populations from these threats, conservation biologists can augment gene flow into small populations to increase variation and reduce inbreeding depression. Spectacular success stories include greater prairie chickens in Illinois (Westermeier et al. 1998 ), adders in Sweden (Madsen et al. 1999 ) and panthers in Florida (Johnson et al. 2010 ). However, we also know that performing such crosses risks introducing genes that may be poorly adapted to local conditions or genetic backgrounds. A classic example of such ‘outbreeding depression’ occurred when different subspecies of ibex from Turkey and the Sinai were introduced to assist recovery of an ibex population in Czechoslovakia (Templeton 1986 ). Despite being fertile, the hybrids birthed calves too early, causing the whole population to disappear. In the face of uncertainty, conservation biologists have tended to respect genetic identity, shying away from routinely crossing populations. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Frankham ( 2015 ) compiles empirical data from experimental studies to assess the costs and benefits of between‐population crosses (Fig.  1 ). Crosses screened to exclude those involving highly divergent populations or distinct habitats show large heterosis with few apparent risks of outbreeding depression. This leads Frankham to advocate for using assisted gene flow more widely. But do the studies analysed in this meta‐analysis adequately test for latent outcrossing depression?     

A mélange of curves – further dialogue about species–area relationships

Scheiner (2003) presented a classification of species–area curves into six types based on the pattern of sampling and how the data are combined to form the curves. Gray et al. (2004) contended that five of those types should be termed ‘species‐accumulation curves’, reserving ‘species–area curve’ for those based on island‐type data. Their proposition contradicts 70 years of usage and confounds curves that are area‐explicit with those that are area‐undefined. In exploring these issues, I highlight additional aspects of species–area and species‐accumulation curves, including the assumption of nesting in Type IV (island) curves, how to convert area‐unspecified curves into area curves, and the effects of the grain of the analysis on the properties of the curve. Further exploration, theoretical development, and dialogue are needed before we will understand all the biology that species–area curves summarize.     

Methods for species delimitation in bumblebees (Hymenoptera,Apidae, Bombus): towards an integrative approach

Delimitation of closely related species is often hindered by the lack of discrete diagnostic morphological characters. This is exemplified in bumblebees (genus Bombus). There have been many attempts to clarify bumblebee taxonomy by using alternative features to discrete morphological characters such as wing shape, DNA, or eco‐chemical traits. Nevertheless each approach has its own limitations. Recent studies have used a multisource approach to gather different lines of speciation evidence in order to draw a strongly supported taxonomic hypothesis in bumblebees. Yet, the resulting taxonomic status is not independent of selected evidence and of consensus methodology (i.e. unanimous procedure, majority, different weighting of evidence). In this article, we compare taxonomic conclusions for a group of taxonomically doubtful species (the Bombus lapidarius‐group) obtained from the four commonly used lines of evidence for species delimitation in bumblebees (geometric morphometric of wing shape, genetic differentiation assessment, sequence‐based species delimitation methods and differentiation of cephalic labial gland secretions). We ultimately aim to assess the usefulness of these lines of evidence as components of an integrative decision framework to delimit bumblebee species. Our results show that analyses based on wing shape do not delineate any obvious cluster. In contrast, nuclear/mitochondrial, sequence‐based species delimitation methods, and analyses based on cephalic labial gland secretions are congruent with each other. This allows setting up an integrative decision framework to establish strongly supported species and subspecies status within bumblebees.