Biphasic control logic of HAMP domain signalling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor

HAMP domains mediate input-output communication in many bacterial signalling proteins. To explore the dynamic bundle model of HAMP signalling (Zhou et al., Mol. Microbiol. 73: 801, 2009), we characterized the signal outputs of 118 HAMP missense mutants of the serine chemoreceptor, Tsr, by flagellar rotation patterns. Receptors with proline or charged amino acid replacements at critical hydrophobic packing residues in the AS1 and AS2 HAMP helices had locked kinase-off outputs, indicating that drastic destabilization of the Tsr-HAMP bundle prevents kinase activation, both in the absence and presence of the sensory adaptation enzymes, CheB and CheR. Attractant-mimic lesions that enhance the structural stability of the HAMP bundle also suppressed kinase activity, demonstrating that Tsr-HAMP has two kinase-off output states at opposite extremes of its stability range. HAMP mutants with locked-on kinase outputs appeared to have intermediate bundle stabilities, implying a biphasic relationship between HAMP stability and kinase activity. Some Tsr-HAMP mutant receptors exhibited reversed output responses to CheB and CheR action that are readily explained by a biphasic control logic. The findings of this study provide strong support for a three-state dynamic bundle model of HAMP signalling in Tsr, and possibly in other bacterial transducers as well.     

Mutational analyses of HAMP helices suggest a dynamic bundle model of input–output signalling in chemoreceptors

To test the gearbox model of HAMP signalling in the Escherichia coli serine receptor, Tsr, we generated a series of amino acid replacements at each residue of the AS1 and AS2 helices. The residues most critical for Tsr function defined hydrophobic packing faces consistent with a four-helix bundle. Suppression patterns of helix lesions conformed to the predicted packing layers in the bundle. Although the properties and patterns of most AS1 and AS2 lesions were consistent with both proposed gearbox structures, some mutational features specifically indicate the functional importance of an x-da bundle over an alternative a-d bundle. These genetic data suggest that HAMP signalling could simply involve changes in the stability of its x-da bundle. We propose that Tsr HAMP controls output signals by modulating destabilizing phase clashes between the AS2 helices and the adjoining kinase control helices. Our model further proposes that chemoeffectors regulate HAMP bundle stability through a control cable connection between the transmembrane segments and AS1 helices. Attractant stimuli, which cause inward piston displacements in chemoreceptors, should reduce cable tension, thereby stabilizing the HAMP bundle. This study shows how transmembrane signalling and HAMP input–output control could occur without the helix rotations central to the gearbox model.     

Not too loose, not too tight--just right. Biphasic control of the Tsr HAMP domain

HAMP domains communicate between input and output signalling modules in a wide variety of bacterial sensor proteins. In the Tsr chemoreceptor, they convert a signal initiated by binding of serine to the periplasmic domain of the protein into regulation of receptor control of the CheA kinase, and ultimately of the direction of flagellar rotation. In this issue, Zhou et al. report an extensive mutational analysis of the Tsr HAMP domain that shows that it can assume a number of different signalling states, which presumably correspond to a variety of different conformations. The two conformational extremes of a tightly packed and a loosely packed HAMP four‐helix bundle support only low levels of CheA activity. Thus, Tsr HAMP does not function as a simple on‐off, two‐state device but rather as a dynamic structure with biphasic control. The normal physiological operating range of Tsr is proposed to be at intermediate degrees of packing of the HAMP four‐helix bundle, but HAMP domains in other proteins could occupy different portions of the conformational spectrum.     

Functional Suppression of HAMP Domain Signaling Defects in the E. coli Serine Chemoreceptor

HAMP domains play key signaling roles in many bacterial receptor proteins. The four-helix HAMP bundle of the homodimeric Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor (Tsr) interacts with an adjoining four-helix sensory adaptation bundle to regulate the histidine autokinase CheA bound to the cytoplasmic tip of the Tsr molecule. The adaptation helices undergo reversible covalent modifications that tune the stimulus-responsive range of the receptor: unmodified E residues promote kinase-off output, and methylated E residues or Q replacements at modification sites promote kinase-on output. We used mutationally imposed adaptational modification states and cells with various combinations of the sensory adaptation enzymes, CheR and CheB, to characterize the signaling properties of mutant Tsr receptors that had amino acid replacements in packing layer 3 of the HAMP bundle and followed in vivo CheA activity with an assay based on Förster resonance energy transfer. We found that an alanine or a serine replacement at HAMP residue I229 effectively locked Tsr output in a kinase-on state, abrogating chemotactic responses. A second amino acid replacement in the same HAMP packing layer alleviated the I229A and I229S signaling defects. Receptors with the suppressor changes alone mediated chemotaxis in adaptation-proficient cells but exhibited altered sensitivity to serine stimuli. Two of the suppressors (S255E and S255A) shifted Tsr output toward the kinase-off state, but two others (S255G and L256F) shifted output toward a kinase-on state. The alleviation of locked-on defects by on-shifted suppressors implies that Tsr-HAMP has several conformationally distinct kinase-active output states and that HAMP signaling might involve dynamic shifts over a range of bundle conformations.     

An Unorthodox Sensory Adaptation Site in the Escherichia coli Serine Chemoreceptor

The serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli contains four canonical methylation sites for sensory adaptation that lie near intersubunit helix interfaces of the Tsr homodimer. An unexplored fifth methylation site, E502, lies at an intrasubunit helix interface closest to the HAMP domain that controls input-output signaling in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. We analyzed, with in vivo Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) kinase assays, the serine thresholds and response cooperativities of Tsr receptors with different mutationally imposed modifications at sites 1 to 4 and/or at site 5. Tsr variants carrying E or Q at residue 502, in combination with unmodifiable D and N replacements at adaptation sites 1 to 4, underwent both methylation and demethylation/deamidation, although detection of the latter modifications required elevated intracellular levels of CheB. These Tsr variants could not mediate a chemotactic response to serine spatial gradients, demonstrating that adaptational modifications at E502 alone are not sufficient for Tsr function. Moreover, E502 is not critical for Tsr function, because only two amino acid replacements at this residue abrogated serine chemotaxis: Tsr-E502P had extreme kinase-off output and Tsr-E502I had extreme kinase-on output. These large threshold shifts are probably due to the unique HAMP-proximal location of methylation site 5. However, a methylation-mimicking glutamine at any Tsr modification site raised the serine response threshold, suggesting that all sites influence signaling by the same general mechanism, presumably through changes in packing stability of the methylation helix bundle. These findings are consistent with control of input-output signaling in Tsr through dynamic interplay of the structural stabilities of the HAMP and methylation bundles.     

Delineating PAS‐HAMP interaction surfaces and signalling‐associated changes in the aerotaxis receptor Aer

The Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor, Aer, monitors cellular oxygen and redox potential via FAD bound to a cytosolic PAS domain. Here, we show that Aer‐PAS controls aerotaxis through direct, lateral interactions with a HAMP domain. This contrasts with most chemoreceptors where signals propagate along the protein backbone from an N‐terminal sensor to HAMP. We mapped the interaction surfaces of the Aer PAS, HAMP and proximal signalling domains in the kinase‐off state by probing the solvent accessibility of 129 cysteine substitutions. Inaccessible PAS‐HAMP surfaces overlapped with a cluster of PAS kinase‐on lesions and with cysteine substitutions that crosslinked the PAS β ‐scaffold to the HAMP AS‐2 helix. A refined Aer PAS‐HAMP interaction model is presented. Compared to the kinase‐off state, the kinase‐on state increased the accessibility of HAMP residues (apparently relaxing PAS‐HAMP interactions), but decreased the accessibility of proximal signalling domain residues. These data are consistent with an alternating static‐dynamic model in which oxidized Aer‐PAS interacts directly with HAMP AS‐2, enforcing a static HAMP domain that in turn promotes a dynamic proximal signalling domain, resulting in a kinase‐off output. When PAS‐FAD is reduced, PAS interaction with HAMP is relaxed and a dynamic HAMP and static proximal signalling domain convey a kinase‐on output.     

Mutational analysis of the control cable that mediates transmembrane signaling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor

During transmembrane signaling by Escherichia coli Tsr, changes in ligand occupancy in the periplasmic serine-binding domain promote asymmetric motions in a four-helix transmembrane bundle. Piston displacements of the signaling TM2 helix in turn modulate the HAMP bundle on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane to control receptor output signals to the flagellar motors. A five-residue control cable joins TM2 to the HAMP AS1 helix and mediates conformational interactions between them. To explore control cable structural features important for signal transmission, we constructed and characterized all possible single amino acid replacements at the Tsr control cable residues. Only a few lesions abolished Tsr function, indicating that the chemical nature and size of the control cable side chains are not individually critical for signal control. Charged replacements at I214 mimicked the signaling consequences of attractant or repellent stimuli, most likely through aberrant structural interactions of the mutant side chains with the membrane interfacial environment. Prolines at residues 214 to 217 also caused signaling defects, suggesting that the control cable has helical character. However, proline did not disrupt function at G213, the first control cable residue, which might serve as a structural transition between the TM2 and AS1 helix registers. Hydrophobic amino acids at S217, the last control cable residue, produced attractant-mimic effects, most likely by contributing to packing interactions within the HAMP bundle. These results suggest a helix extension mechanism of Tsr transmembrane signaling in which TM2 piston motions influence HAMP stability by modulating the helicity of the control cable segment.     

A mutational wrench in the HAMP gearbox

HAMP domains communicate between input and output signalling elements in bacterial proteins. In the Tsr chemoreceptor, they convert axial movement of transmembrane helix 2 into changes in packing of the cytoplasmic kinase-control module (KCM). Zhou et al . suggest transmembrane helix 2 'tugs' on HAMP to destabilize x-da packing of the parallel four-helix bundle of the HAMP homodimer. Attractants would inhibit tugging. HAMP stability may be inversely related to stability of the a-d packing of the anti-parallel four-helix bundle of KCM, a relationship possibly facilitated by HAMP/KCM helical mismatch. The beauty of this idea lies in its simplicity and testability.     

Mutational analysis of the connector segment in the HAMP domain of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor

HAMP domains are approximately 50-residue motifs, found in many bacterial signaling proteins, that consist of two amphiphilic helices joined by a nonhelical connector segment. The HAMP domain of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli, receives transmembrane input signals from the periplasmic serine binding domain and in turn modulates output signals from the Tsr kinase control domain to elicit chemotactic responses. We created random amino acid replacements at each of the 14 connector residues of Tsr-HAMP to identify those that are critical for Tsr function. In all, we surveyed 179 connector missense mutants and identified three critical residues (G235, L237, and I241) at which most replacements destroyed Tsr function and another important residue (G245) at which most replacements impaired Tsr function. The region surrounding G245 tolerated 1-residue deletions and insertions of up to 10 glycines, suggesting a role as a relatively nonspecific, flexible linker. The critical connector residues are consistent with a structural model of the Tsr-HAMP domain based on the solution structure of an isolated thermophile HAMP domain (M. Hulko, F. Berndt, M. Gruber, J. U. Linder, V. Truffault, A. Schultz, J. Martin, J. E. Schultz, A. N. Lupas, and M. Coles, Cell 126:929-940, 2006) in which G235 defines a critical turn at the C terminus of the first helix and L237 and I241 pack against the helices, perhaps to stabilize alternative HAMP signaling conformations. Most I241 lesions locked Tsr signal output in the kinase-on mode, implying that this residue is responsible mainly for stabilizing the kinase-off signaling state. In contrast, lesions at L237 resulted in a variety of aberrant output patterns, suggesting a role in toggling output between signaling states.     

Phenol sensing by Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: a nonclassical mechanism

The four transmembrane chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli sense phenol as either an attractant (Tar) or a repellent (Tap, Trg, and Tsr). In this study, we investigated the Tar determinants that mediate its attractant response to phenol and the Tsr determinants that mediate its repellent response to phenol. Tar molecules with lesions in the aspartate-binding pocket of the periplasmic domain, with a foreign periplasmic domain (from Tsr or from several Pseudomonas chemoreceptors), or lacking nearly the entire periplasmic domain still mediated attractant responses to phenol. Similarly, Tar molecules with the cytoplasmic methylation and kinase control domains of Tsr still sensed phenol as an attractant. Additional hybrid receptors with signaling elements from both Tar and Tsr indicated that the transmembrane (TM) helices and HAMP domain determined the sign of the phenol-sensing response. Several amino acid replacements in the HAMP domain of Tsr, particularly attractant-mimic signaling lesions at residue E248, converted Tsr to an attractant sensor of phenol. These findings suggest that phenol may elicit chemotactic responses by diffusing into the cytoplasmic membrane and perturbing the structural stability or position of the TM bundle helices, in conjunction with structural input from the HAMP domain. We conclude that behavioral responses to phenol, and perhaps to temperature, cytoplasmic pH, and glycerol, as well, occur through a general sensing mechanism in chemoreceptors that detects changes in the structural stability or dynamic behavior of a receptor signaling element. The structurally sensitive target for phenol is probably the TM bundle, but other behaviors could target other receptor elements.     

Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: cheD mutations affect the structure and function of the Tsr transducer

The tsr gene specifies a methyl-accepting membrane protein involved in chemotaxis to serine and several repellent compounds. We have characterized a special class of tsr mutations designated cheD which alter the signaling properties of the Tsr transducer. Unlike tsr null mutants, cheD strains are generally nonchemotactic, dominant in complementation tests, and exhibit a pronounced counterclockwise bias in flagellar rotation. Several lines of evidence showed that cheD mutations were alleles of the tsr gene. First, cheD mutations were mapped into the same deletion segments as conventional tsr mutations. Second, restriction site analysis of the transducing phage deletions used to construct the genetic map demonstrated that the endpoints of the deletion segments fell within the tsr coding sequence. Third, a number of the cheD mutants synthesized Tsr proteins with slight changes in electrophoretic mobility, consistent with alterations in Tsr primary structure. These mutant proteins were able to undergo posttranslational deamidation and methylation reactions in the same manner as wild-type Tsr protein; however, the steady-state level of Tsr methylation in cheD strains was very high. The methylation state of the Tar protein, another species of methyl-accepting protein in Escherichia coli, was also higher than normal in cheD strains, suggesting that the aberrant Tsr transducer in cheD mutants has a generalized effect on the sensory adaptation system of the cell. These properties are consistent with the notion that the Tsr protein of cheD mutants is locked in an excitatory signaling mode that both activates the sensory adaptation system and drowns out chemotactic signals generated by other transducer species. Further study of cheD mutations thus promises to reveal valuable information about the functional architecture of the Tsr protein and how this transducer controls flagellar behavior.     

Methylation segments are not required for chemotactic signalling by cytoplasmic fragments of Tsr, the methyl-accepting serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli

The serine chemoreceptor Tsr and other methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) control the swimming behaviour of Escherichia coli by generating signals that influence the direction of flagellar rotation. MCPs produce clockwise (CW) signals by stimulating the autophosphorylation activity of CheA, a cytoplasmic histidine kinase, and counter-clockwise signals by inhibiting CheA. CheW couples CheA to chemoreceptor control by promoting formation of MCP/CheW/CheA ternary complexes. To identify MCP structural determinants essential for CheA stimulation, we inserted fragments of the tsr coding region into an inducible expression vector and used a swimming contest called 'pseudotaxis' to select for transformant cells carrying CW-signalling plasmids. The shortest active fragment we found, Tsr (350–470), stimulated CheA in a CheW-dependent manner, as full-length Tsr molecules do. It spans a highly conserved 'core' (370–420) that probably specifies the CheA and CheW contact sites and other determinants needed for stimulatory control of CheA. Tsr (350–470) also carries portions of the left and right arms flanking the core, which probably play roles in regulating MCP signalling state. However, this Tsr fragment lacks all of the methylation sites characteristic of MCP molecules, indicating that methylation segments are not essential for generating receptor output signals.     

Different conformations of the kinase-on and kinase-off signaling states in the Aer HAMP domain

HAMP domains are sensory transduction modules that connect input and output domains in diverse signaling proteins from archaea, bacteria, and lower eukaryotes. Here, we employed in vivo disulfide cross-linking to explore the structure of the HAMP domain in the Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor Aer. Using an Aer HAMP model based on the structure of Archaeoglobus fulgidus Af1503-HAMP, the closest residue pairs at the interface of the HAMP AS-1 and AS-2' helices were determined and then replaced with cysteines and cross-linked in vivo. Except for a unique discontinuity in AS-2, the data suggest that the Aer HAMP domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle that is similar to the structure of Af1503. The HAMP discontinuity was associated with a segment of AS-2 that was recently shown to interact with the Aer-PAS sensing domain. The four-helix HAMP bundle and its discontinuity were maintained in both the kinase-on and kinase-off states of Aer, although differences in the rates of disulfide formation also indicated the existence of different HAMP conformations in the kinase-on and kinase-off states. In particular, the kinase-on state was accompanied by significantly increased disulfide formation rates at the distal end of the HAMP four-helix bundle. This indicates that HAMP signaling may be associated with a tilting of the AS-1 and AS-2' helices, which may be the signal that is transmitted to the kinase control region of Aer.     

The mechanisms of HAMP-mediated signaling in transmembrane receptors

HAMP domains mediate signal transduction in over 7500 enzyme-coupled receptors represented in all kingdoms of life. The HAMP domain of the putative archaeal receptor Af1503 has a parallel, dimeric, four-helical coiled coil structure, but with unusual core packing, related to canonical packing by concerted axial rotation of the helices. This has led to the gearbox model for signal transduction, whereby the alternate packing modes correspond to signaling states. Here we present structures of a series of Af1503 HAMP variants. We show that substitution of a conserved small side chain within the domain core (A291) for larger residues induces a gradual transition in packing mode, involving both changes in helix rotation and bundle shape, which are most prominent at the C-terminal, output end of the domain. These are correlated with activity and ligand response in vitro and in vivo by incorporating Af1503 HAMP into mycobacterial adenylyl cyclase assay systems.     

Transmembrane signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors: E. coli transducers with locked signal output

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) function as transmembrane signalers in bacteria. We isolated and characterized mutants of the E. coli Tsr protein that produce output signals in the absence of overt stimuli and that are refractory to sensory adaptation. The properties of these "locked" transducers indicate that MCP molecules are capable of generating signals that actively augment clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation of the flagellar motors. Transitions between MCP signaling states can be influenced by amino acid replacements in many parts of the molecule, including the methylation sites, at least one of the two membrane-spanning segments, and a linker region connecting the receptor and signaling domains. These findings suggest that transmembrane signaling may involve direct propagation of conformational changes between the periplasmic and cytoplasmic portions of the MCP molecule.     

HAMP domain signal relay mechanism in a sensory rhodopsin-transducer complex

The phototaxis receptor complex composed of sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) and the transducer subunit HtrII mediates photorepellent responses in haloarchaea. Light-activated SRII transmits a signal through two HAMP switch domains (HAMP1 and HAMP2) in HtrII that bridge the photoreceptive membrane domain of the complex and the cytoplasmic output kinase-modulating domain. HAMP domains, widespread signal relay modules in prokaryotic sensors, consist of four-helix bundles composed of two helices, AS1 and AS2, from each of two dimerized transducer subunits. To examine their molecular motion during signal transmission, we incorporated SRII-HtrII dimeric complexes in nanodiscs to allow unrestricted probe access to the cytoplasmic side HAMP domains. Spin-spin dipolar coupling measurements confirmed that in the nanodiscs, SRII photoactivation induces helix movement in the HtrII membrane domain diagnostic of transducer activation. Labeling kinetics of a fluorescein probe in monocysteine-substituted HAMP1 mutants revealed a light-induced shift of AS2 against AS1 by one-half α-helix turn with minimal other changes. An opposite shift of AS2 against AS1 in HAMP2 at the corresponding positions supports the proposal from x-ray crystal structures by Airola et al. (Airola, M. V., Watts, K. J., Bilwes, A. M., and Crane, B. R. (2010) Structure 18, 436-448) that poly-HAMP chains undergo alternating opposite interconversions to relay the signal. Moreover, we found that haloarchaeal cells expressing a HAMP2-deleted SRII-HtrII exhibit attractant phototaxis, opposite from the repellent phototaxis mediated by the wild-type di-HAMP SRII-HtrII complex. The opposite conformational changes and corresponding opposite output signals of HAMP1 and HAMP2 imply a signal transmission mechanism entailing small shifts in helical register between AS1 and AS2 alternately in opposite directions in adjacent HAMPs.     

Structure of the conserved HAMP domain in an intact, membrane-bound chemoreceptor: a disulfide mapping study

The HAMP domain is a conserved motif widely distributed in prokaryotic and lower eukaryotic organisms, where it is often found in transmembrane receptors that regulate two-component signaling pathways. The motif links receptor input and output modules and is essential to receptor structure and signal transduction. Recently, a structure was determined for a HAMP domain isolated from an unusual archeal membrane protein of unknown function [Hulko, M., et al. (2006) Cell 126, 929-940]. This study uses cysteine and disulfide chemistry to test this archeal HAMP model in the full-length, membrane-bound aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. The chemical reactivities of engineered Cys residues scanned throughout the aspartate receptor HAMP region are highly correlated with the degrees of solvent exposure of corresponding positions in the archeal HAMP structure. Both domains are homodimeric, and the individual subunits of both domains share the same helix-connector-helix organization with the same helical packing faces. Moreover, disulfide mapping reveals that the four helices of the aspartate receptor HAMP domain are arranged in the same parallel, four-helix bundle architecture observed in the archeal HAMP structure. One detectable difference is the packing of the extended connector between helices, which is not conserved. Finally, activity studies of the aspartate receptor indicate that contacts between HAMP helices 1 and 2' at the subunit interface play a critical role in modulating receptor on-off switching. Disulfide bonds linking this interface trap the receptor in its kinase-activating on-state, or its kinase inactivating off-state, depending on their location. Overall, the evidence suggests that the archeal HAMP structure accurately depicts the architecture of the conserved HAMP motif in transmembrane chemoreceptors. Both the on- and off-states of the aspartate receptor HAMP domain closely resemble the archeal HAMP structure, and only a small structural rearrangement occurs upon on-off switching. A model incorporating HAMP into the full receptor structure is proposed.     

Mechanism of regulation of receptor histidine kinases

Bacterial transmembrane receptors regulate an intracellular catalytic output in response to extracellular sensory input. To investigate the conformational changes that relay the regulatory signal, we have studied the HAMP domain, a ubiquitous intracellular module connecting input to output domains. HAMP forms a parallel, dimeric, four-helical coiled coil, and rational substitutions in our model domain (Af1503 HAMP) induce a transition in its interhelical packing, characterized by axial rotation of all four helices (the gearbox signaling model). We now illustrate how these conformational changes are propagated to a downstream domain by fusing Af1503 HAMP variants to the DHp domain of EnvZ, a bacterial histidine kinase. Structures of wild-type and mutant constructs are correlated with ligand response in vivo, clearly associating them with distinct signaling states. We propose that altered recognition of the catalytic domain by DHp, rather than a shift in position of the phospho-accepting histidine, forms the basis for regulation of kinase activity.     

Differential backbone dynamics of companion helices in the extended helical coiled‐coil domain of a bacterial chemoreceptor

Cytoplasmic domains of transmembrane bacterial chemoreceptors are largely extended four‐helix coiled coils. Previous observations suggested the domain was structurally dynamic. We probed directly backbone dynamics of this domain of the transmembrane chemoreceptor Tar from Escherichia coli using site‐directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Spin labels were positioned on solvent‐exposed helical faces because EPR spectra for such positions reflect primarily polypeptide backbone movements. We acquired spectra for spin‐labeled, intact receptor homodimers solubilized in detergent or inserted into native E. coli lipid bilayers in Nanodiscs, characterizing 16 positions distributed throughout the cytoplasmic domain and on both helices of its helical hairpins, one amino terminal to the membrane‐distal tight turn (N‐helix), and the other carboxyl terminal (C‐helix). Detergent solubilization increased backbone dynamics for much of the domain, suggesting that loss of receptor activities upon solubilization reflects wide‐spread destabilization. For receptors in either condition, we observed an unanticipated difference between the N‐ and C‐helices. For bilayer‐inserted receptors, EPR spectra from sites in the membrane‐distal protein‐interaction region and throughout the C‐helix were typical of well‐structured helices. In contrast, for approximately two‐thirds of the N‐helix, from its origin as the AS‐2 helix of the membrane‐proximal HAMP domain to the beginning of the membrane‐distal protein‐interaction region, spectra had a significantly mobile component, estimated by spectral deconvolution to average approximately 15%. Differential helical dynamics suggests a four‐helix bundle organization with a pair of core scaffold helices and two more dynamic partner helices. This newly observed feature of chemoreceptor structure could be involved in receptor function.     

Mutational Analysis of the Transmembrane Helix 2-HAMP Domain Connection in the Escherichia coli Aspartate Chemoreceptor Tar

Transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) of the Tar chemoreceptor undergoes an inward piston-like displacement of 1 to 3 Å upon binding aspartate. This signal is transmitted to the kinase-control module via the HAMP domain. Within Tar, the HAMP domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle consisting of a dimer of two amphipathic helices connected by a flexible linker. In the nuclear magnetic resonance structure of an archaeal HAMP domain, residues corresponding to the MLLT sequence between Arg-214 at the end of TM2 and Pro-219 of Tar are an N-terminal helical extension of AS1. We modified this region to test whether it behaves as a continuous helical connection between TM2 and HAMP. First, one to four Gly residues were inserted between Thr-218 and Pro-219. Second, the MLLT sequence was replaced with one to nine Gly residues. Third, the sequence was shortened or extended with residues compatible with helix formation. Cells expressing receptors in which the MLLT sequence was shortened to MLL or in which the MLLT sequence was replaced by four Gly residues performed good aspartate chemotaxis. Other mutant receptors supported diminished aspartate taxis. Most mutant receptors had biased signal outputs and/or abnormal patterns of adaptive methylation. We interpret these results to indicate that a strong, permanent helical connection between TM2 and the HAMP domain is not necessary for normal transmembrane signaling.The HAMP domain is a structural motif commonly found in histidine kinases (HKs), adenylate cyclases, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), and phosphatases (2). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica MCPs, the HAMP domain is located between a transmembrane-sensing module composed of ligand-binding and transmembrane regions and a kinase-control module composed of adaptation and kinase-activating regions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (19). Therefore, HAMP domains are responsible for bidirectional signal transduction between these modules.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Domain architecture of the aspartate chemoreceptor. (A) The cartoon, based on a figure from Hazelbauer et al. (2008) (19), illustrates the architecture of the aspartate chemoreceptor. Protein structural domains are labeled on the left, and functional modules are labeled on the right. (B) Schematic of TM2 and the control cable region attached to a ribbon diagram of the solution NMR structure of the Af1503 HAMP domain four-helix bundle (22). TM2 is shown in purple within the membrane. The control cable of Tar_Ec consists of 5 amino acyl residues (Gly-Ile-Arg-Arg-Met) that connect TM2 and AS1 of HAMP. AS1 is shown in blue, AS2 is shown in red, and the 14-residue AS1-AS2 connector (CTR) is shown in black. The residue equivalent to Arg-214 in Tar_Ec is also highlighted in blue, the conserved Pro residue (Pro-219 in Tar_Ec) is highlighted in yellow, and residues equivalent to the MLLT sequence between TM2 and Pro-219 in Tar_Ec are highlighted in cyan.The determination of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure of a HAMP domain from an MCP remains elusive. However, a solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of a HAMP domain has been determined for the Af1503 protein of unknown function from the archaeal thermophile Archeoglobus fulgidus (22). The domain forms a parallel four-helix bundle, with two amphipathic helices, AS1 and AS2, being contributed by each subunit (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). In this structure, the helices pack in an unusual x-da configuration, commonly referred to as knobs-to-knobs packing, in which the large hydrophobic x residues stabilize both intrasubunit and intersubunit interactions.Evidence for the existence of a four-helix HAMP bundle within intact receptors comes from disulfide cross-linking experiments with Salmonella enterica Tar (Tar_Se) (41) and the E. coli Aer redox receptor (Aer_Ec) (44). In vivo genetic studies (1, 48) are also consistent with the existence of a four-helix bundle in the E. coli Tsr receptor (Tsr_Ec).Tar_Ec functions as the aspartate chemoreceptor in E. coli (39). Each monomer within the homodimeric (15, 29) receptor possess a periplasmic ligand-binding domain composed of four antiparallel α helices that form four-helix bundles (8). The transmembrane regions that flank this periplasmic domain (transmembrane helix 1 [TM1] and TM2) are extensions of the periplasmic helices PD1 and PD4 (27, 33, 37, 40). Aspartate binds at either of two rotationally symmetrical sites at the dimer interface. Each binding site contains residues from PD1 of one subunit and PD1′ and PD4′ of the other. Aspartate binding generates a small (∼1- to 3-Å) vertical displacement into the cytoplasm of one contiguous PD4-TM2 helix relative to the other (14).E. coli Tar (Tar_Ec) and other chemoreceptors normally activate the histidine protein kinase CheA (5), which is coupled to the receptors via the adapter protein CheW. CheA autophosphorylates, and the phosphoryl group is subsequently transferred to the response regulator CheY (21). CheY-P interacts with FliM within the flagellar motor to promote clockwise (CW) rotation of the flagella (36, 46). Counterclockwise (CCW) motor rotation allows the flagellar filaments to coalesce into a bundle that propels the cell in a run (38). CW rotation of one or more flagella disrupts the bundle and generates a tumble (43). Therefore, the relative activities of CheA and the CheY-P phosphatase, CheZ, establish the ratio of CheY to CheY-P within the cell and hence the frequency of tumbling (11, 21).The conformational changes induced by aspartate convert Tar_Ec from a stimulator of CheA activity into an inhibitor (6). The resulting drop in CheY-P activity, which is accelerated by CheZ, suppresses tumbling and lengthens the average run. Inhibition of CheA activity is reversed by covalent methylation of the cognate receptor (17). Methylation is facilitated by a transient decrease in the level of the active, phosphorylated form of the CheB methylesterase (26), which is another substrate for phosphotransfer from CheA (21). The well-studied properties of this system, and the possibility of monitoring several different in vivo parameters, make it amenable for examining signal transduction between TM2 and the adjoining HAMP domain.The apical region of AS1 in Tar_Ec is composed of the tetrapeptide Met-Leu-Leu-Thr, which connects residue Arg-214 at the end of TM2 with the conserved Pro-219 residue within AS1 of the HAMP domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). The corresponding sequence is Thr-Ile-Thr-Arg in the Af1503 HAMP domain. In the NMR structure of the isolated Af1503 HAMP, the corresponding four residues (Thr-Ile-Thr-Arg) comprise an unpaired helical extension of the N terminus of AS1 before Pro-283 (9, 22), but it is unclear how these residues may pack in an intact membrane-spanning protein. In the Af1503 HAMP, Pro-283 packs against residues Glu-311 and Ile-312, which form the N terminus of AS2. The residues at the equivalent positions in Tar_Ec are Glu-246 and Met-247 (Fig. ​(Fig.1B1B).We modified the length and residue composition of the region between Arg-214 and Pro-219 in Tar_Ec in different ways and monitored the ability of the mutant proteins to support chemotactic migration, to generate the clockwise flagellar rotation that reflects CheA activation, and to regulate adaptive methylation. The results support a model in which the structural tension exerted by TM2 on AS1 controls its signaling state, as proposed by Zhou et al. (48). In the context of that model, the results suggest that when the receptor is in the kinase-inhibiting state, the HAMP domain is in a stable four-helix bundle.