Pituitary response to exogenous LHRH in superovulated women

The response of the pituitary to exogenous LHRH was investigated in 9 normally ovulating women during the late follicular phase of a spontaneous (control) cycle, a cycle during treatment with clomiphene and a cycle during treatment with 'pure' FSH. During clomiphene treatment, basal FSH concentrations increased significantly up to Day 6 of the cycle and then decreased progressively while basal LH values showed a continuous rise. During treatment with FSH, basal LH concentrations decreased significantly. The response of both FSH and LH to LHRH showed a significant and quantitatively similar decrease during clomiphene or FSH administration as compared to the spontaneous cycles. It is suggested that basal secretion of FSH and LH is regulated by two separate mechanisms, and that an ovarian inhibitory factor(s) attenuates the response of both FSH and LH to exogenous LHRH and possibly the endogenous LH surge in superovulated cycles.     

Use of clomiphene and luteinizing hormone/follicle stimulating hormone-releasing hormone in investigation of ovulatory failure.

A luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone-releasing hormone (LH/FSH-RH) test was performed in 70 women with amenorrhoea or anovulatory infertility, or both, and a clomiphene stimulation test was also performed in 24 of these patients. Most patients responded to LH/FSH-RH with significant increases in LH and FSH. In women with gonadal dysgenesis or premature ovarian failure exaggerated responses were observed after LH/FSH-RH and there was no change in high basal LH levels after clomiphene. Patients with absent or impaired responses to LH/FSH-RH failed to respond to clomiphene. All patients with anovulatory menstrual cycles responded to both LH/FSH-RH and clomiphene, while seven out of 13 amenorrhoeic patients with a normal LH/FSH-RH response showed an early LH rise during clomiphene treatment and six were unresponsive. These results suggest a difference between the two groups at hypothalamic level with consequent therapeutic implications.     

Effects of dexamethasone and dexamethasone plus naltrexone on pituitary response to GnRH and TRH in normal women.

The hypothesis that glucocorticoids have a direct central inhibitory effect on the reproductive axis is sutained by the identification of glucocorticoid receptors on GnRH-secreting neurons and gonadotropic pituitary cells. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids and opioids interact centrally in the regulation of the GnRH-LH axis. The inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids may manifest not only directly through the hormone-receptor link, but also indirectly through an increase in opioid tone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of glucocorticoids and glucocorticoids combined with an opioid antagonist, in the regulation of basal and GnRH- and TRH-stimulated secretion of LH, FSH and Prl in 7 women with normal menstrual cycles. Blood samples were obtained every 10 min for an hour. GnRH (50 microgram) and TRH (200 microgram) were administered and blood sampling was continued every 15 min for 2 h (day 1). At 5 a.m. the next day, naltrexone (50 mg) was given and at 8 a.m. the GnRH-TRH test was repeated (day 2). At 5 a.m. on day 3, the patients took 2 mg oral dexamethasone and the test was repeated. At 5 a.m. on day 4, the patients took naltrexone and dexamethasone and at 8 a.m. the GnRH-TRH test was repeated. Administration of naltrexone did not cause significant changes in basal concentrations of LH and FSH and their response to GnRH. The area under the curve of the LH response to GnRH on day 3 was significantly less than on days 1, 2 and 4. Administration of naltrexone (day 2) did not cause any significant increase in basal and TRH-stimulated levels of Prl with respect to day 1. On day 3, dexamethasone caused a reduced response of Prl to TRH. Pretreatment with naltrexone (day 4) prevented this reduction. These results suggest that suppression of the response of LH to GnRH induced by dexamethasone may be partly mediated by endogenous opioids. Dexamethasone led to a reduction in the response of Prl to TRH, and naltrexone blocked this suppression. Hence the suppression of Prl and LH by dexamethasone must be partly mediated by endogenous opioids, which must therefore inhibit pituitary secretion of Prl.     

Alteration of gonadotrophin and steroid hormone release, and of ovarian function by a GnRH antagonist in gilts

This study examined the impact of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Antarelix on LH, FSH, ovarian steroid hormone secretion, follicular development and pituitary response to LHRH in cycling gilts. Oestrous cycle of 24 Landrace gilts was synchronised with Regumate (for 15 days) followed by 800 IU PMSG 24h later. In experiment 1, Antarelix (n=6 gilts) was injected i.v. (0.5mg per injection) twice daily on four consecutive days from day 3 to 6 (day 0=last day of Regumate feeding). Control gilts (n=6) received saline. Blood was sampled daily, and every 20 min for 6h on days 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. In experiment 2, gilts (n=12) were assigned to the following treatments: Antarelix; Antarelix + 50 microg LHRH on day 4; Antarelix + 150 microg LHRH on day 4 or control, 50 microg LHRH only on day 4. Blood samples were collected daily and every 20 min for 6h on days 2, 4 and 6 to assess LH pulsatility. Ovarian follicular development was evaluated at slaughter.Antarelix suppressed (P<0.05) serum LH concentrations. The amount of LH released on days 4-9 (experiment 1) was 8.80 versus 36.54 ngml(-1) (S.E.M.=6.54). The pattern of FSH, and the preovulatory oestradiol rise was not affected by GnRH antagonist. Suppression of LH resulted in a failure (P<0.05) of postovulatory progesterone secretion. Exogenous LHRH (experiment 2) induced a preovulatory-like LH peak, however in Antarelix treated gilts the LH surge started earlier and its duration was less compared to controls (P<0.01). Furthermore, the amount of LH released from day 4 to 5 was lower (P<0.01) in Antarelix, Antarelix + 50 and Antarelix + 150 treated animals compared to controls. No differences were estimated in the number of LH pulses between days and treatment. Pulsatile FSH was not affected by treatment. Mean basal LH levels were lower (P<0.05) after antagonist treatment compared to controls. Antarelix blocked the preovulatory LH surge and ovulation, but the effects of Antarelix were reduced by exogenous LHRH treatment. The development of follicles larger than 4mm was suppressed (P<0.05) by antagonist treatment.In conclusion, Antarelix treatment during the follicular phase blocked preovulatory LH surge, while FSH and oestradiol secretion were not affected. Antarelix failed to alter pulsatile LH and FSH secretor or pituitary responsiveness to LHRH during the preovulatory period.     

Menstrual cycle characteristics and predictability of ovulation of Bhutia women in Sikkim, India

Although a woman's menstrual history can have significant implications for health outcomes, few studies have examined menstrual cycle variability in non-western, non-clinically based populations. This study presents menstrual cycle characteristics from Bhutia women living in Gangtok, Sikkim, India. The Bhutia are one of two indigenous populations residing in this small, northeastern state of India. A total of 1067 cycles were recorded by 200 Bhutia women over the course of 12 months. Mean cycle length in this population was similar to reported mean cycle lengths for populations in the U.S (30 days vs. 28 days). Menstrual cycles in this sample were highly variable with most women experiencing more than one short or long menstrual cycle. The frequency of irregular menstrual cycles experienced by individuals also varied significantly by season. A body mass index (BMI) above or below the WHO defined normal range was associated with higher rates of irregular cycles. Leutenizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were also determined from urine samples collected just before mid-cycle, based on median cycle lengths. Although menstrual cycles in this sample were highly variable, median cycle length was still useful in predicting timing of the pre-ovulatory hormone surges of LH and FSH. Frequency of irregular cycles did impact the successful capture of the LH and FSH peak values.     

Short-term pulsatile administration of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in male adolescents with multiple idiopathic pituitary hormone deficiencies

In order to define both level and severity of defect in patients with idiopathic multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD) and to find out which patient might benefit from pulsatile LHRH substitution therapy, the effect of short-term pulsatile LHRH infusion in 6 affected male adolescents was studied. Controls were 9 boys with constitutional delay of puberty (CD). During a spontaneous nocturnal plasma profile LH and FSH levels were prepubertal with little evidence of pulsatile secretory LH activity in all MPHD patients. During short-term pulsatile LHRH stimulation (36 h), however, all showed a significant rise in mean LH and FSH levels (p less than 0.0001). Linear regression analysis revealed significant continuous increases of FSH (p less than 0.001) in all patients and of LH (p less than 0.01) in all but one patient. These changes were not accompanied by an increase of testosterone, androstenedione and DHAS levels. Since all MPHD patients showed steadily increasing gonadotropin levels if stimulated in a pulsatile manner, we conclude that the defect might only in part be located at the pituitary level. Long-term pulsatile substitution therapy with LHRH is likely to be successful in these patients as has been demonstrated in patients with known hypothalamic defect.     

Effects of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on gonadotrophins in the hamster

The changes in serum gonadotrophins in male hamsters following one injection of 15 μg luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) (Group A) were compared with those following the last injection of LHRH in animals receiving an injection approximately every 12 hr for 4 days (Group B) or 12 days (Group C). Peak follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (ng/ml) were 1776±218 (Group A), 2904±346 (Group B), and 4336±449 (Group C). Peak luteinizing hormone (LH) values (ng/ml) were 1352±80 (Group A), 410±12 (Group B), and 498±53 (Group C). Serum FSH:LH ratios, calculated from the concentrations measured 16 hr after the last LHRH injections, were higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. Similar injections of LHRH (100 ng or 15 μg/injection) for 6 days elevated the serum FSH:LH ratio in intact males. Five such LHRH injections (100 ng/injection) blunted the rise in serum LH in orchidectomized hamsters. Direct effects of LHRH on gonadotrophin secretory dynamics or altered brain-pituitary-testicular interactions may alter the ratio of FSH to LH in the hamster.     

Selective release of follicle-stimulating hormone by 5 alpha-dihydroprogesterone in immature ovariectomized estrogen-primed rats

The effect of 5 alpha-dihydroprogesterone (5 alpha-DHP) on gonadotropin release was examined in the immature acutely ovariectomized (OVX) rat primed with a low dose of estradiol (E2). Treatment with various doses of 5 alpha-DHP given in combination with E2 increased levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) but had no effect on serum luteinizing hormone (LH). A single injection of a maximally stimulating dose of 5 alpha-DHP (0.4 mg/kg) stimulated increases in serum FSH at 1200 h and, 6 h later, at 1800 h. Pituitary LH and FSH content was dramatically enhanced by 1600 h and levels remained elevated at 1800 h. The administration of pentobarbital at 1200 h, versus 1400 h or 1600 h, prevented the increase in basal serum FSH levels at 1800 h, implying that the release of hypothalamic LH releasing hormone (LHRH) is modulated by 5 alpha-DHP. In addition, changes in pituitary sensitivity to LHRH as a result of 5 alpha-DHP were measured and a significant increase in the magnitude of FSH release was observed at 1200 h and 1800 h. Although the LH response to LHRH in 5 alpha-DHP-treated rats was not different from controls, the duration of LH release was lengthened. These results suggest that 5 alpha-DHP may stimulate FSH release by a direct action at the pituitary level. Together, these observations support the theory that 5 alpha-DHP mediates the facilitative effect of progesterone on FSH secretion and further suggests an action of 5 alpha-DHP in this phenomenon at both pituitary and hypothalamic sites.     

Dissociation of LH and FSH Responses to LHRH during estrogen therapy of patients with ovarian failure

This study examines the effect of oral estrogen treatment on gonadotropin secretion in three young women with gonadal failure. Each subject was treated with 0.1 mg BID of ethinyl estradiol for four weeks, and the LH and FSH responses to 200 microgram of intravenously administered LHRH were measured basally and weekly during therapy. Significant reduction of basal levels of FSH occurred within one week of treatment, with obliteration of LHRH-mediated FSH responsiveness within two weeks. By contrast, basal levels of LH were significantly reduced by the end of the second week of treatment, and LHRH-mediated LH levels were sustained for three weeks. In one subject an LHRH test was performed every other day for two weeks after cessation of therapy. Return of FSH responsiveness was delayed one week beyond that of LH, which occurred within three days of discontinuation of estrogen. These results indicate that during the early phase of oral estrogen replacement therapy, FSH secretion may be selectively blunted; after discontinuation of treatment, recovery of FSH secretion lags behind recovery of LH.     

Effect of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone pulse characteristics on comparative luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone secretion from superfused rat anterior pituitary cell cultures

We have shown that 4 ng luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) pulses induced significantly greater luteinizing hormone (LH) release from proestrous rat superfused anterior pituitary cells with no cycle related differences in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Current studies gave 8 ng LHRH in various pulse regimens to study amplitude, duration and frequency effects on LH and FSH secretion from estrous 0800, proestrous 1500 and proestrous 1900 cells. Regimen 1 gave 8 ng LHRH as a single bolus once/h; regimen 2 divided the 8 ng into 3 equal 'minipulses' given at 4 min intervals to extend duration; regimen 3 gave the 3 'minipulses' at 10 min intervals, thereby further extending duration: regimen 4 was the same as regimen 2, except that the 3 'minipulses' were given at a pulse frequency of 2 h rather than 1 h. In experiment 1, all four regimens were employed at proestrus 1900. FSH was significantly elevated by all 8 ng regimens as compared to 4 ng pulses; further, 8 ng divided into 3 equal 'minipulses' separated by 4 min at 1 and 3 h frequencies (regimens 2 and 4) resulted in FSH secretion that was significantly greater than with either a single 8 ng bolus (regimen 1) or when the 'minipulses' were separated by 10 min (regimen 3). In experiment 2, at proestrus 1500, FSH response to the second pulse of regimen 4 was significantly greater than in regimen 2; LH release was significantly suppressed at pulse 2 compared to regimen 2 accentuating divergent FSH secretion. At estrus 0800, FSH response to the second pulse of regimen 4 was significantly stimulated FSH at proestrus 1900, 1500 and estrus 0800, FSH divergence was most marked at proestrus 1500. These data indicate a potential role for hypothalamic LHRH secretory pattern in inducing divergent gonadotropin secretion in the rat.     

Modulation of pituitary responsiveness to LHRH by androgens in ovariectomized female rats.

The effect of androgens on pituitary response to luteinizing-hormore-releasing hormone (LHRH) and their ability to modify effects of 17beta-estradiol (E2) on pituitary responsiveness to LHRH were tested in ovariectomized rats maintained on a daily dose of 0.25 microgram estradiol benzoate per rat for 6 d before androgen administration. Testosterone propionate (TP) (4, 40, 400, or 4000 microgram per rat), administered 24 h before LHRH (500 ng per rat), had no significant effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) response. Similar doses of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) did not significantly alter the LH response but significantly suppressed the FSH response. Even the lowest dose completely blocked the FSH response to LHRH. TP in combination with 4 or 400 microgram of E2 suppressed the stimulatory effect of E2 on both LH and FSH response to LHRH in a dose-related manner. DHT and E2 in combination affected LH response inconsistently, whereas their ratio determined FSH response; there was pronounced inhibition of FSH response in rats given high doses of DHT combined with low doses of E2; DHT inhibition of FSH response in animals receiving 4 microgram of DHT with 400 microgram E2 was partially overcome by the stimulatory effect of E2. Our results indicate that TP and DHT affect LH and FSH response to LHRH differently. The ratio of androgen to estrogen is important in determining the response to LHRH.     

Variation in pituitary responsiveness to synthetic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) during different phases of the menstrual cycle (author's transl)

Synthetic GnRH, at a dose of 100 mcg, was injected intravenously into 12 healthy, single, regulary menstruating women in order to test the capacity of the pituitary to release LH and FSH in response to the administration of the decapeptide. A total of 12 tests was performed during different stages of the menstrual cycle, i.e., on D 3-4, D 13-16 and D 21-29 of the cycle. Following GnRH administration, there was a rapid increase in serum levels of LH. Although there was a pronounced variation of responses in the course of the menstrual cycle, the maximum response was observed 30 to 40 min., after injection. The mean net increases of LH (M +/- SE mIU/ml) were in the following order: 118 +/- 22 in the preovulatory phase, 63 +/- 12 in the midluteal phase, and 35 +/- 7 in the early follicular phase. A concomitant but much smaller rise in serum levels of FSH was observed. These data indicate that the sensitivity of pituitary gonadotrophs to GnRH is preferentially increased during the preovulatory phase of the cycle, thus lending further support to already published data which demonstrated increased pituitary sensitivity to GnRH toward midcycle.     

The release of pituitary gonadotrophins by luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in the intact,castrated and aspermatogenic rat

The change in serum gonadotrophin concentration in response to synthetic Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone (LHRH - 400 ng i.v.) was investigated under barbiturate anaesthesia in adult male rats either chronically castrated, rendered aspermatogenic by the administration of α-chlorohydrin 12–16 weeks previously (to remove inhibin), or treated with vehicle. A single injection of LHRH increased serum LH and FSH concentrations similarly in both intact and aspermatogenic rats. In castrated rats the amount of LH released was much greater and the FSH secretion sustained. A second injection produced a similar increase although a second peak of FSH could not be detected in castrated rats as the FSH level was still elevated. The increase in LH levels was two to three times larger in response to the second injection of LHRH than to the first in all groups. The results do not support the hypothesis that the enhanced gonadotropin response to castration in the aspermatogenic rat is due to increased pituitary sensitivity to LHRH.     

Release of luteinizing hormone and growth hormone after recovery from maximal exercise

Pulsatile properties of luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH) release were evaluated in 19 eumenorrheic untrained females [mean age 31.1 +/- 1.1 yr, height 165.2 +/- 1.4 cm, weight 64.8 +/- 2.1 kg, peak oxygen uptake (Vo2) 41.6 +/- 1.4 (SE) ml.kg-1.min-1] during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (days 3-4 after the onset of menses). Each subject was studied during two consecutive menstrual cycles under each of two conditions in random order: 1) no formal exercise for 72 h (C) and 2) 12-24 h after two maximal exercise bouts (peak Vo2/lactate threshold treadmill evaluation and a 3,200-m time-trial run or a maximal Vo2 inclined treadmill test) performed on consecutive days (EX). Blood sampling was performed every 10 min for 12 h. LH and GH pulsatile parameters were identified and characterized by the Cluster pulse detection algorithm. No significant differences were noted in the number of peaks, peak amplitude, interpeak interval, peak increment, or 12-h integrated concentrations between C and EX for LH or GH. We conclude that maximal exercise protocols typically used for exercise evaluation do not have an effect on the pulsatile characteristics of LH or GH release in untrained women during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle if 12-24 h of recovery are allowed before evaluation of the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropins or GH.     

Effect of estrogen administration on endogenous and luteinizing hormone-releasing-hormone-induced luteinizing hormone secretion and follicular development in the lactating sow

The objectives of this study were to investigate whether estradiol treatment during lactation modifies 1) the patterns of endogenous LH, FSH, and prolactin (PRL) release; 2) the sensitivity of the pituitary to exogenous injections of LHRH; and 3) the responsiveness of the ovarian follicles to gonadotropin. Plasma LH, FSH, and PRL were determined in samples taken repeatedly from 18 sows on Days 24-27 of lactation. Ovaries were then recovered, and follicular development was assessed by measuring the follicular diameter (FFD) and follicular fluid estradiol-17 beta concentration (FFE) of the ten largest follicles dissected from each ovary. Sows were randomly allocated to one of four treatments: 1) Group C (4 sows) received no treatment; 2) Group LHRH (5 sows) received 800 ng of LHRH every 2 h throughout the sampling period; 3) Group E2 (4 sows) received subcutaneous implants containing estradiol-17 beta 24 h after start of sampling; 4) Group LHRH + E2 (5 sows) were administered a combination of LHRH and estradiol-17 beta implants. Between-animal variability for plasma LH, FSH, and PRL was considerable. LH concentration and LH pulse frequency increased (p less than 0.05) after LHRH treatment in the LHRH and LHRH + E2 groups; however, an acute inhibition of LH secretion was observed in the latter group immediately after estradiol implant application. In the absence of LHRH treatment, estradiol caused chronic inhibition of LH secretion. Follicular development was greater in the LHRH and LHRH + E2 groups compared to the C and E2 groups (p less than 0.05 for both FFD and FFE).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The rapid effects of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on the mouse pituitary in vitro

The effect of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and its analogs on the release of FSH and LH by 20 day old whole mouse pituitary incubated in vitro for 3-4 hrs was investigated. Three agonistic analogs (AY 25650, 25205 and Buserelin) all of which are reported to be superactive in vivo showed approximately the same potency in this in vitro test system. Preincubation of the pituitaries for 1 h with the antagonistic analogs [Ac Dp Cl Phe1,2, D Trp3, D Phe6, D Ala10] LHRH and [Ac Dp Cl Phe1,2, D Trp3, D Arg6, D Ala10] LHRH inhibited the secretion of LH and FSH induced by 2.5 x 10(-9)M LHRH. The inhibitory response was dose dependent. The continued presence of the antagonists was not required for effective suppression of the LHRH effect. Experiments designed to find out the minimum time required for eliciting suppression of LHRH revealed that preincubation of the pituitary with the second antagonist for 5 mins followed by removal was adequate to produce effective inhibition of gonadotropin release. At lower doses of the antagonist, LH release was more effectively inhibited than FSH release. The results suggest that antagonistic analogs can effectively bind to LHRH receptors in the whole pituitary incubation preventing the subsequent action of LHRH. With the present incubation system assessment of bioactive LH and FSH release is possible within 24 hrs.     

Mechanism of the stimulatory action of antisteroid RU486 on follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in the cyclic Rat

These experiments explored the mechanism underlying FSH hypersecretion on estrous afternoon in rats injected with RU486 (RU) on proestrus. Four-day cyclic rats were injected with RU at 12:00 h on proestrus (1 or 4 mg/0.2 ml oil; s.c.), and its effects on LH and FSH secretion at 18:30 h on estrus were compared with those of antiprogestagens ZK299 (ZK) (1 or 4 mg/0.2 ml oil; s.c.) and Org31806 (OR) (2 or 8 mg/0.2 ml oil; s.c.). Additionally, rats treated with RU or nembutal (PB) (60 mg/kg; i.p. at 13:00 h on proestrus) were injected with an LHRH antagonist (LHRHa) at 10:00 h on estrus (1 mg/0.2 ml saline; s.c.) or progesterone (P) (7.7, 15.5 or 30.9 mg/0.2 ml oil; s.c.) on proestrus at 10:00 h in RU-injected rats and at 14:00 h in PB-injected rats. Animals were killed by decapitation at 18:30 h on estrus and serum LH and FSH concentrations were determined. Rats treated with 1 or 4 mg of RU or Org or 4 mg of ZK recorded increased serum FSH on estrous afternoon, while 1 mg ZK had no effect. PB increased mainly serum LH levels and, to a lesser extent, FSH levels. P decreased serum FSH concentrations in both RU- and PB-injected rats. LHRHa reversed the effects of PB on FSH secretions, but reduced FSH hypersecretion induced by RU only. These results are interpreted to mean that, in the absence of proestrous afternoon P-inhibitory action of the neural stimulus controlling LHRH release, FSH secretion on estrous afternoon involves two components: one is LHRH dependent while, in contrast to LH secretion, the other is LHRH independent, and only expressed in a low estrogen background.     

Feedback regulation of gonadotropic hormone secretion in neonatal pigs

The effect of castration and of administration of charcoal-treated porcine follicular fluid (pFF) containing inhibin-like activity on plasma concentration of gonadotropic hormones was studied in neonatal pigs. Plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration averaged 25.1 +/- 1.5 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM) in 1-wk-old females and gradually declined to 20.2 +/- 0.7 ng/ml 6 wk later. Ovariectomy did not significantly influence plasma FSH concentration. In males, concentration averaged 8.0 +/- 0.7 ng/ml before castration but rose significantly within 2 days after castration. Injection of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) did not influence plasma FSH concentrations in intact males, but did in females and in 7-wk-old males castrated at 1 wk. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations in 1-wk-old females (2.2 +/- 0.4 ng/ml) gradually declined and were not influenced by castration. Concentrations of plasma LH in 1-wk-old male piglets (2.8 +/- 0.7 ng/ml) were not significantly influenced by castration within 2 days but were significantly higher 6 wk later. LHRH induced a significant rise in plasma LH concentrations in all animals. Injection of pFF resulted in a decline of plasma FSH concentrations in intact and castrated males and in intact females, but did not influence plasma LH concentrations. These data demonstrate a sex-specific difference in the control of plasma FSH, but not in plasma LH concentration in the neonatal pig. Plasma FSH concentrations, but not plasma LH concentrations, are suppressed by testicular hormones in 1-wk-old piglets. Plasma FSH concentrations can be suppressed in both neonatal male and female pigs by injections of pFF.     

Effects of intermittent pulsatile infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on dihydrotestosterone-suppressed gonadotropin secretion in castrate rams

The feedback effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on gonadotropin secretion in rams were investigated using DHT-implanted castrate rams (wethers) infused with intermittent pulsatile luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) for 14 days. Castration, as anticipated, reduced both serum testosterone and DHT but elevated serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Dihydrotestosterone implants raised serum DHT in wethers to intact ram levels and blocked the LH and FSH response to castration. The secretory profile of these individuals failed to show an endogenous LH pulse during any of the scheduled blood sampling periods, but a small LH pulse was observed following a 5-ng/kg LHRH challenge injection. Dihydrotestosterone-implanted wethers given repeated LHRH injections beginning at the time of castration increased serum FSH and yielded LH pulses that were temporally coupled to exogenous LHRH administration. While the frequency of these secretory episodes was comparable to that observed for castrates, amplitudes of the induced LH pulses were blunted relative to those observed for similarly infused, testosterone-implanted castrates. Dihydrotestosterone was also shown to inhibit LH and FSH secretion and serum testosterone concentrations in intact rams. In summary, it appears that DHT may normally participate in feedback regulation of LH and FSH secretion in rams. These data suggest androgen feedback is regulated by deceleration of the hypothalamic LHRH pulse generator and direct actions at the level of the adenohypophysis.     

Inhibitory effects of a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist implant on ovine fetal gonadotrophin secretion and pituitary sensitivity to luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone.

Sheep fetuses at day 70 of gestation (term = 145 days) were implanted subcutaneously with a biodegradable implant containing a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (buserelin) to investigate whether treatment with LHRH agonist would induce a state of desensitization of the fetal gonadotrophs and thus influence fetal gonadal development. Treatment with the LHRH agonist for 35-40 days caused a significant reduction in mean fetal plasma concentrations of LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) compared with control fetuses. LH pulses were evident in control fetuses but were completely abolished by buserelin treatment. Furthermore, the pituitary content of LH and FSH was significantly depleted in fetuses implanted with LHRH agonist. A bolus intravenous injection of 500 ng LHRH given to control fetuses caused a rapid and significant increase in plasma LH and FSH concentrations which was sustained for at least 60 min after injection. Pretreatment with buserelin completely abolished the LH and FSH responses to a bolus injection of LHRH. There were no differences between the sexes in fetal gonadotrophin concentrations or pituitary sensitivity to LHRH in control or agonist-treated fetuses. Furthermore, buserelin treatment for 35-40 days had no effect on the morphological appearance of the fetal gonads when compared with control fetuses, at least to day 110 of pregnancy. These results provide evidence for the induction of a state of desensitization of the LHRH receptors of the fetal pituitary gonadotrophs following long-term treatment with an LHRH agonist, but provide no evidence for a role for gonadotrophin secretion in gonadal development at this stage in fetal life.