Tracking Auxin Receptors Using Functional Approaches

Functional approaches toward the identification of auxin receptors developed along two major lines: the isolation and characterization of mutants or transgenic plants affected in their responses to the hormone and the study of early auxin effects at the cell level such as expression of specific genes or modifications of plasma membrane properties. The combination of these approaches with those aiming at the molecular characterization of auxin binding proteins as putative auxin receptors allowed to bring further insight into the mechanisms of auxin perception by plant cells. Studies of membrane responses to auxin clearly demonstrated the existence of elementary response chains to auxin at the plasma membrane, the activation of auxin responsive proteins leading to changes in the membrane potential via the stimulation of the proton pump ATPase or the modulation of ion channels. A two-component model is proposed for the organization of functional auxin perception units at the plasma membrane, comprising an auxin-binding moiety related to the major auxin-binding protein from maize (ZmER-abp1), associated to a transmembrane protein. Current research investigates the relevance of this model and tries to assess whether early responses at the plasma membrane share common perception or transduction steps with gene expression responses and participate in more integrated biological responses to auxin.     

Auxin-regulated gene expression

During the 1960s a wide range of studies provided an information base that led to the suggestion that auxin-regulated cell processes--especially cell elongation--may be mediated by auxin-regulated gene expression. Indirect evidence from our work, based on the influence of inhibitors of RNA synthesis (e.g. actinomycin D) and of protein synthesis (e.g. cycloheximide) on auxin-induced cell elongation, coupled with correlations of the influence of auxin on RNA synthesis and cell elongation, provided the basis for this suggestion. With the availability of techniques for DNA-DNA and DNA-RNA hybridization, mRNA isolation-translation, in vitro 2D gel analysis of the translation products, and ultimately the cloning by recombinant DNA technologies of genomic DNA and copy DNAs (cDNAs) made to poly(A)+ mRNAs, we and others have provided direct evidence for the influence of auxin on the expression of a few genes (i.e. poly(A)+ RNA levels). Our laboratory has provided evidence for auxin's both down-regulating and up-regulating the level of a few poly(A)+ mRNAs out of a population of about 4 X 10(4) sequences that are not significantly affected by auxin. In our studies on auxin-regulated cell elongation, two cDNA clones (pJCW1 and pJCW2) were isolated which corresponded to poly(A)+ mRNAs that responded during growth transitions in a way consistent with a potential role of their protein products in cell elongation. These mRNAs are most abundant in the elongating zone of the soybean hypocotyl. Upon excision and incubation in the absence of auxin, these mRNAs deplete in concert with a decreasing rate of cell elongation. Addition of auxin to the medium results in both increased levels of these mRNAs and enhanced rates of cell elongation. These mRNAs do not deplete if auxin is added to the medium at the onset of excised incubation, and cell elongation rates remain high. We have isolated and sequenced genomic clones that are homologous to these cDNAs. Of the two genes sequenced, both genes are members of small multigene families. There are regions of high amino acid homology even though the nucleotide sequences are sufficiently different in these regions for cross-hybridization of the clones not to be observed. More recently others, especially Guilfoyle's laboratory, have shown that auxin selectively and rapidly influences the level of certain mRNAs and proteins. We have worked on other gene systems such as ribosomal proteins and possible cell wall proteins that are responsive to auxin; again the nature of regulation of expression of these genes is not known.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The AXR1 and AUX1 genes of Arabidopsis function in separate auxin-response pathways

The recessive mutations aux1 and axr1 of Arabidopsis confer resistance to the plant hormone auxin. The axr1 mutants display a variety of morphological defects. In contrast, the only morphological defect observed in aux1 mutants is a loss of root gravitropism. To learn more about the function of these genes in auxin response, the expression of the auxin-regulated gene SAUR-AC1 in mutant and wild-type plants has been examined. It has been found that axr1 plants display a pronounced deficiency in auxin-induced accumulation of SAUR-AC1 mRNA in seedlings as well as rosette leaves and mature roots. In contrast, the aux1 mutation has a modest effect on auxin induction of SAUR-AC1. To determine if the AUX1 and AXR1 genes interact to facilitate auxin response, plants which are homozygous for both aux1 and axr1 mutations have been constructed and characterized. The two mutations are additive in their effects on auxin response, suggesting that each mutation confers resistance by a different mechanism. However, the morphology of double mutant plants indicates that there is an inter-action between the AXR1 and AUX1 genes. In mature plants, the aux1-7 mutation acts to partially suppress the morphological defects conferred by the axr1-12 mutation. This suppression is not accompanied by an increase in auxin response, as measured by SAUR-AC1 expression, suggesting that the interaction between the AUX1 and AXR1 genes is indirect.     

PIN-pointing the molecular basis of auxin transport.

Significant advances in the genetic dissection of the auxin transport pathway have recently been made. Particularly relevant is the molecular analysis of mutants impaired in auxin transport and the subsequent cloning of genes encoding candidate proteins for the elusive auxin efflux carrier. These studies are thought to pave the way to the detailed understanding of the molecular basis of several important facets of auxin action.     

RAC/ROP GTPases and auxin signaling

Auxin functions as a key morphogen in regulating plant growth and development. Studies on auxin-regulated gene expression and on the mechanism of polar auxin transport and its asymmetric distribution within tissues have provided the basis for realizing the molecular mechanisms underlying auxin function. In eukaryotes, members of the Ras and Rho subfamilies of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases function as molecular switches in many signaling cascades that regulate growth and development. Plants do not have Ras proteins, but they contain Rho-like small G proteins called RACs or ROPs that, like fungal and metazoan Rhos, are regulators of cell polarity and may also undertake some Ras functions. Here, we discuss the advances made over the last decade that implicate RAC/ROPs as mediators for auxin-regulated gene expression, rapid cell surface-located auxin signaling, and directional auxin transport. We also describe experimental data indicating that auxin-RAC/ROP crosstalk may form regulatory feedback loops and theoretical modeling that attempts to connect local auxin gradients with RAC/ROP regulation of cell polarity. We hope that by discussing these experimental and modeling studies, this perspective will stimulate efforts to further refine our understanding of auxin signaling via the RAC/ROP molecular switch.     

Cycling of auxin-binding protein through the plant cell: pathways in auxin signal transduction.

The auxin receptor literature contains a glaring discrepancy that invites explanation. While some physiological experiments suggest that active auxin receptors are sited inside the cell, others point to action at the cell surface. Furthermore, although the major auxin-binding protein (ABP) of maize (Zea mays) coleoptiles is found in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), exogenous ABP can mediate auxin-dependent changes in the plasma membrane potential of protoplasts. How can an ER protein mediate changes in cell potential? To resolve this dilemma, I propose that ABP cycles through the cell. In response to auxin, ABP is released from the ER and follows a secretory pathway to the cell surface. After secretion, ABP would bind sites on the cell surface and become subject to endocytosis, cycling back to the ER. Elevated auxin would accelerate the cycling of ABP between the ER and the cell surface. If cell wall precursors interacted with ABP during their progression through the secretory pathway, this would provide a mechanism for regulating cell wall synthesis. At the cell surface ABP would regulate an enzyme responsible for maintaining membrane potential. Both of these responses are components of auxin-regulated growth. This hypothesis does not exclude other mechanisms of signal transduction, particularly in gene regulation.     

The effect of auxin starvation on the growth of auxin-dependent tobacco cell culture: dynamics of auxin-binding activity and endogenous free IAA content

The growth of a cell strain derived from the stem pith of tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L., cv. Virginia Bright Italia) was investigatedin subcultures grown at various levels of synthetic auxins.Both partial and complete auxin starvation resulted in a decreaseof the frequency of cell division. For these treatments theendogenous free indole-3-acetic acid content increased substantiallyat the commencement of the exponential growth phase. The possibilitythat the receptivity of the cells to auxin changed during thegrowth cycle was examined by measuring the activity of a membrane-boundauxin-binding site. In subcultures grown in a medium with anoptimal auxin concentration the maximum auxin-binding activitywas restricted to the end of the exponential growth phase. Inthe cells cultivated in partially or completely auxin deprivedmedia the auxin-binding activity increased to varying extents.These results probably reflect mechanisms controlling both theintracellular content of free auxin and the sensitivity of thecells to exogenous auxin supply (including auxin binding) withrespect to the cell division and/or growth Key words: Nicotiana tabacum L., plant cell culture, IAA, auxin-binding site, cell division     

The auxin-binding pocket of auxin-binding protein 1 comprises the highly conserved boxes a and c

The auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) has already been proved to be an extracellular receptor of auxin in single cell systems. Protoplasts of maize coleoptiles respond to auxin with an increase in volume. The 2-naphthaleneacetic acid (2-NAA), an inactive auxin analog, acts as an anti-auxin in protoplast swelling, as it suppresses the effect of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Antibodies raised against box a of ABP1 induce protoplast swelling in the absence of auxin. This response is inhibited by pre-incubation with 2-NAA. The effect of 2-NAA on swelling induced by agonistic antibodies appears to depend on the binding characteristics of the antibody. ScFv12, an antibody directed against box a, box c and the C-terminal domain of ABP1 also exhibits auxin-agonist activity which is, however, not abolished by 2-NAA. Neither does 2-NAA affect the activity of the C-terminal peptide of ABP1, which is predicted to interact with putative binding proteins of ABP1. These results support the view that box a and box c of ABP1 are auxin-binding domains.