Differential bonding interactions of inverse agonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in stabilizing the inactive state

Although the sartan family of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs), which includes valsartan, olmesartan, and losartan, have a common pharmacophore structure, their effectiveness in therapy differs. Although their efficacy may be related to their binding strength, this notion has changed with a better understanding of the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that each ARB differs with regard to its molecular interactions with AT(1) receptor in inducing inverse agonism. Interactions between valsartan and residues Ser(105), Ser(109), and Lys(199) were important for binding. Valsartan is a strong inverse agonist of constitutive inositol phosphate production by the wild-type and N111G mutant receptors. Substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies indicated that valsartan, but not losartan, which has only weak inverse agonism, may stabilize the N111G receptor in an inactive state upon binding. In addition, the inverse agonism by valsatan was mostly abolished with S105A/S109A/K199Q substitutions in the N111G background. Molecular modeling suggested that Ser(109) and Lys(199) bind to phenyl and tetrazole groups of valsartan, respectively. Ser(105) is a candidate for binding to the carboxyl group of valsartan. Thus, the most critical interaction for inducing inverse agonism involves transmembrane (TM) V (Lys(199)) of AT(1) receptor although its inverse agonist potency is comparable to olmesartan, which bonds with TM III (Tyr(113)) and TM VI (His(256)). These results provide new insights into improving ARBs and development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists.     

Control of conformational equilibria in the human B2 bradykinin receptor. Modeling of nonpeptidic ligand action and comparison to the rhodopsin structure

A prototypic study of the molecular mechanisms of activation or inactivation of peptide hormone G protein-coupled receptors was carried out on the human B2 bradykinin receptor. A detailed pharmacological analysis of receptor mutants possessing either increased constitutive activity or impaired activation or ligand recognition allowed us to propose key residues participating in intramolecular interaction networks stabilizing receptor inactive or active conformations: Asn(113) and Tyr(115) (TM III), Trp(256) and Phe(259) (TM VI), Tyr(295) (TM VII) which are homologous of the rhodopsin residues Gly(120), Glu(122), Trp(265), Tyr(268), and Lys(296), respectively. An essential experimental finding was the spatial proximity between Asn(113), which is the cornerstone of inactive conformations, and Trp(256) which plays a subtle role in controlling the balance between active and inactive conformations. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis data showed that Trp(256) and Tyr(295) constitute, together with Gln(288), receptor contact points with original nonpeptidic ligands. It provided an explanation for the ligand inverse agonist behavior on the WT receptor, with underlying restricted motions of TMs III, VI, and VII, and its agonist behavior on the Ala(113) and Phe(256) constitutively activated mutants. These data on the B2 receptor emphasize that conformational equilibria are controlled in a coordinated fashion by key residues which are located at strategic positions for several G protein-coupled receptors. They are discussed in comparison with the recently determined rhodopsin crystallographic structure.     

Reassessment of the Unique Mode of Binding between Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Their Blockers

While the molecular structures of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT₁) receptor blockers (ARBs) are very similar, they are also slightly different. Although each ARB has been shown to exhibit a unique mode of binding to AT₁ receptor, different positions of the AT₁ receptor have been analyzed and computational modeling has been performed using different crystal structures for the receptor as a template and different kinds of software. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the critical positions of the AT₁ receptor, Tyr¹¹³, Tyr¹⁸⁴, Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ using a mutagenesis study, and subsequently performed computational modeling of the binding of ARBs to AT₁ receptor using CXCR4 receptor as a new template and a single version of software. The interactions between Tyr¹¹³ in the AT₁ receptor and the hydroxyl group of olmesartan, between Lys¹⁹⁹ and carboxyl or tetrazole groups, and between His²⁵⁶ or Gln²⁵⁷ and the tetrazole group were studied. The common structure, a tetrazole group, of most ARBs similarly bind to Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ of AT₁ receptor. Lys¹⁹⁹ in the AT₁ receptor binds to the carboxyl group of EXP3174, candesartan and azilsartan, whereas oxygen in the amidecarbonyl group of valsartan may bind to Lys¹⁹⁹. The benzimidazole portion of telmisartan may bind to a lipophilic pocket that includes Tyr¹¹³. On the other hand, the n-butyl group of irbesartan may bind to Tyr¹¹³. In conclusion, we confirmed that the slightly different structures of ARBs may be critical for binding to AT₁ receptor and for the formation of unique modes of binding.     

Sauvagine cross-links to the second extracellular loop of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor

Contact sites between the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRFR1), the sauvagine (SVG) radioligands [Tyr(0),Gln(1)]SVG ((125)I-YQS) and [Tyr(0),Gln(1), Leu(17)]SVG ((125)I-YQLS) were examined. (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS was cross-linked to CRFR1 using the chemical cross-linker, disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), which cross-links the epsilon amino groups of lysine residues that have a molecular distance of 11.4 A. DSS specifically and efficiently cross-linked (125)I-YQLS and (125)I-YQS to CRFR1. CRFR1 contains 5 putative extracellular lysine residues (Lys(110), Lys(111), Lys(113), Lys(257), and Lys(262)) that can cross-link to the 4 lysine residues (Lys(16), Lys(22), Lys(25), and Lys(27)) of the radioligands. Identification of the CNBr-cleaved fragments of CRFR1 cross-linked to (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS established that the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 cross-links to Lys(16) of YQS. Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis (changing Lys to Arg in CRFR1 individually and in combination) revealed that Lys(257) in the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 is an important cross-linking site. In conclusion, it was shown that in SVG-bound CRFR1, Lys(257) of CRFR1 lies in close proximity (11.4 A) to Lys(16) of SVG.     

Three distinct epitopes on the extracellular face of the glucagon receptor determine specificity for the glucagon amino terminus

The glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are homologous family B seven-transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptors, and they selectively recognize the homologous peptide hormones glucagon (29 amino acids) and GLP-1 (30-31 amino acids), respectively. The amino-terminal extracellular domain of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors (140-150 amino acids) determines specificity for the carboxyl terminus of glucagon and GLP-1, respectively. In addition, the glucagon receptor core domain (7TM helices and connecting loops) strongly determines specificity for the glucagon amino terminus. Only 4 of 15 residues are divergent in the glucagon and GLP-1 amino termini; Ser2, Gln3, Tyr10, and Lys12 in glucagon and the corresponding Ala8, Glu9, Val16, and Ser18 in GLP-1. In this study, individual substitution of these four residues of glucagon with the corresponding residues of GLP-1 decreased the affinity and potency at the glucagon receptor relative to glucagon. Substitution of distinct segments of the glucagon receptor core domain with the corresponding segments of the GLP-1 receptor rescued the affinity and potency of specific glucagon analogs. Site-directed mutagenesis identified the Asp385 --> Glu glucagon receptor mutant that specifically rescued Ala2-glucagon. The results show that three distinct epitopes of the glucagon receptor core domain determine specificity for the N terminus of glucagon. We suggest a glucagon receptor binding model in which the extracellular ends of TM2 and TM7 are close to and determine specificity for Gln3 and Ser2 of glucagon, respectively. Furthermore, the second extracellular loop and/or proximal segments of TM4 and/or TM5 are close to and determine specificity for Lys12 of glucagon.     

Computational studies of pandemic 1918 and 2009 H1N1 hemagglutinins bound to avian and human receptor analogs

The purpose of this work was to study the binding properties of two pandemic influenza A virus 1918 H1N1 (SC1918) and 2009 H1N1 (CA09) hemagglutinin (HA) with avian and human receptors. The quantum chemical calculations have been performed to analyze the interactions of 130 loop, 190 helix, 220 loop region, and conserved residues 95,145,153–155, of pandemic viruses’ HA with sialo-trisaccharide receptor of avian and human using density functional theory. The HA’s residues Tyr 95, Ala 138, Gln 191, Arg 220, and Asp 225 from the above regions have stronger interaction with avian receptor. The residues Thr 136, Trp 153, His 183, and Asp 190 of HA are important and play a significant role to bind with human receptor. The residues Tyr 95, Ala 138, Lys 145, Trp 153, Gln 192, and Gln 226 of HA of CA09 virus have found more interaction energies with human than avian receptors. Due to mutations in the active residues of HA of CA09 virus comparing with SC1918, the binding capabilities of HA with human have been increased. The molecular dynamics simulation was made to understand the different dynamical properties of HA and molecular interactions between HA of these two viruses with sialo-trisaccharide receptors of avian and human receptors. The interaction energy of HA of CA09 virus with human receptor decreases due to the human receptor far away from conserved residue region of HA protein. This reveals that the conserved residues particularly Lys 145 play major contribution to interaction with human receptor in HA of CA09 virus.     

Two mutations in extracellular loop 2 of the human GnRH receptor convert an antagonist to an agonist

GnRH regulates the reproductive system through cognate G protein-coupled receptors in vertebrates. Certain GnRH analogs that are antagonists at mammalian receptors behave as agonists at Xenopus laevis and chicken receptors. This phenomenon provides the opportunity to elucidate interactions and the mechanism underlying receptor activation. A D-Lys(iPr) in position 6 of the mammalian GnRH receptor antagonist is required for this agonist activity (inositol phosphate production) in the chicken and X. laevis GnRH receptors. Chimeric receptors, in which extracellular loop domains of the human GnRH receptor were substituted with the equivalent domains of the X. laevis GnRH receptor, identified extracellular loop 2 as the determinant for agonist activity of one of the mammalian antagonists: antagonist 135-18. Site-directed mutagenesis of nine nonconserved residues in the C-terminal domain of extracellular loop 2 of the human GnRH receptor showed that a minimum of two mutations (Val(5.24(197))Ala and Trp(5.32(205))His) is needed in this region for agonist activity of antagonist 135-18. Agonist activity of antagonist 135-18 was markedly decreased by low pH (<7.0) compared with GnRH agonists. These findings indicate that D-Lys(iPr)(6) forms a charge-supported hydrogen bond with His(5.32(205)) to stabilize the receptor in the active conformation. This discovery highlights the importance of EL-2 in ligand binding and receptor activation in G protein-coupled receptors.     

In silico characterization of binding mode of CCR8 inhibitor: homology modeling,docking and membrane based MD simulation study

Human CC-chemokine receptor 8 (CCR8) is a crucial drug target in asthma that belongs to G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, which is characterized by seven transmembrane helices. To date, there is no X-ray crystal structure available for CCR8; this hampers active research on the target. Molecular basis of interaction mechanism of antagonist with CCR8 remains unclear. In order to provide binding site information and stable binding mode, we performed modeling, docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of CCR8. Docking study of biaryl-ether-piperidine derivative (13C) was performed inside predefined CCR8 binding site to get the representative conformation of 13C. Further, MD simulations of receptor and complex (13C-CCR8) inside dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine lipid bilayers were performed to explore the effect of lipids. Results analyses showed that the Gln91, Tyr94, Cys106, Val109, Tyr113, Cys183, Tyr184, Ser185, Lys195, Thr198, Asn199, Met202, Phe254, and Glu286 were conserved in both docking and MD simulations. This indicated possible role of these residues in CCR8 antagonism. However, experimental mutational studies on these identified residues could be effective to confirm their importance in CCR8 antagonism. Furthermore, calculated Coulombic interactions represented the crucial roles of Glu286, Lys195, and Tyr113 in CCR8 antagonism. Important residues identified in this study overlap with the previous non-peptide agonist (LMD-009) binding site. Though, the non-peptide agonist and currently studied inhibitor (13C) share common substructure, but they differ in their effects on CCR8. So, to get more insight into their agonist and antagonist effects, further side-by-side experimental studies on both agonist (LMD-009) and antagonist (13C) are suggested.     

Role of aromaticity of agonist switches of angiotensin II in the activation of the AT1 receptor

We have shown previously that the octapeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) activates the AT1 receptor through an induced-fit mechanism (Noda, K., Feng, Y. H., Liu, X. P., Saad, Y., Husain, A., and Karnik, S. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 16435-16442). In this activation process, interactions between Tyr4 and Phe8 of Ang II with Asn111 and His256 of the AT1 receptor, respectively, are essential for agonism. Here we show that aromaticity, primarily, and size, secondarily, of the Tyr4 side chain are important in activating the receptor. Activation analysis of AT1 receptor position 111 mutants by various Ang II position 4 analogues suggests that an amino-aromatic bonding interaction operates between the residue Asn111 of the AT1 receptor and Tyr4 of Ang II. Degree and potency of AT1 receptor activation by Ang II can be recreated by a reciprocal exchange of aromatic and amide groups between positions 4 and 111 of Ang II and the AT1 receptor, respectively. In several other bonding combinations, set up between Ang II position 4 analogues and receptor mutants, the gain of affinity is not accompanied by gain of function. Activation analysis of position 256 receptor mutants by Ang II position 8 analogues suggests that aromaticity of Phe8 and His256 side chains is crucial for receptor activation; however, a stacked rather than an amino-aromatic interaction appears to operate at this switch locus. Interaction between these residues, unlike the Tyr4:Asn111 interaction, plays an insignificant role in ligand docking.     

Comparative structure-activity studies on mammalian [Arg8] LH-RH and chicken [Gln8] LH-RH by fluorimetric titration

Fluorimetric titrations of mammalian [Arg8] LH-RH, chicken [Gln8] LH-RH and an analogue [Lys8] LH-RH revealed pK values of 5.80, 6.22 and 6.01 for His2, and 9.65, 9.88 and 9.88 for Tyr5. The titration ranges for His2 were 1.72, 2.03 and 1.71 while the range for Tyr5 was rather similar (approximately 1.7) for all three peptides. Biological activity and receptor binding in the mammalian system for chicken LH-RH was 1% relative to mammalian LH-RH while [Lys8] LH-RH had a relative activity of approximately 10%. In contrast, mammalian and chicken LH-RH were equipotent in stimulating LH release from chicken pituitary cells. The results indicate differences in the receptors related to the conformations of LH-RH and position 8-substituted analogues.     

Constitutive activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the spatial proximity of transmembrane 7 to the ligand-binding pocket

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TM) following binding of agonist. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which constitutes a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TM helices. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we initially identified those residues within the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) of wild type angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor that contribute to forming the binding site pocket. We have substituted successively TM7 residues ranging from Ile276 to Tyr302 to cysteine. Treatment of A277C, V280C, T282C, A283C, I286C, A291C, and F301C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent MTSEA significantly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was greatly reduced for TM7 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active mutant of the AT1 receptor. Our data suggest that upon activation, TM7 of the AT1 receptor goes through a pattern of helical movements that results in its distancing from the binding pocket per se. These studies support accumulating evidence whereby elements of TM7 of class A GPCRs promote activation of the receptor through structural rearrangements.     

Long Range Effect of Mutations on Specific Conformational Changes in the Extracellular Loop 2 of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

The topology of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) and its interaction with ligands is unique in each G protein-coupled receptor. When the orthosteric ligand pocket located in the transmembrane (TM) domain is occupied, ligand-specific conformational changes occur in the ECL2. In more than 90% of G protein-coupled receptors, ECL2 is tethered to the third TM helix via a disulfide bond. Therefore, understanding the extent to which the TM domain and ECL2 conformations are coupled is useful. To investigate this, we examined conformational changes in ECL2 of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) by introducing mutations in distant sites that alter the activation state equilibrium of the AT1R. Differential accessibility of reporter cysteines introduced at four conformation-sensitive sites in ECL2 of these mutants was measured. Binding of the agonist angiotensin II (AngII) and inverse agonist losartan in wild-type AT1R changed the accessibility of reporter cysteines, and the pattern was consistent with ligand-specific “lid” conformations of ECL2. Without agonist stimulation, the ECL2 in the gain of function mutant N111G assumed a lid conformation similar to AngII-bound wild-type AT1R. In the presence of inverse agonists, the conformation of ECL2 in the N111G mutant was similar to the inactive state of wild-type AT1R. In contrast, AngII did not induce a lid conformation in ECL2 in the loss of function D281A mutant, which is consistent with the reduced AngII binding affinity in this mutant. However, a lid conformation was induced by [Sar¹,Gln²,Ile⁸] AngII, a specific analog that binds to the D281A mutant with better affinity than AngII. These results provide evidence for the emerging paradigm of domain coupling facilitated by long range interactions at distant sites on the same receptor.     

Conformational switch of angiotensin II type 1 receptor underlying mechanical stress-induced activation

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that has a crucial role in the development of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Here, we show that cell stretch leads to activation of the AT(1) receptor, which undergoes an anticlockwise rotation and a shift of transmembrane (TM) 7 into the ligand-binding pocket. As an inverse agonist, candesartan suppressed the stretch-induced helical movement of TM7 through the bindings of the carboxyl group of candesartan to the specific residues of the receptor. A molecular model proposes that the tight binding of candesartan to the AT(1) receptor stabilizes the receptor in the inactive conformation, preventing its shift to the active conformation. Our results show that the AT(1) receptor undergoes a conformational switch that couples mechanical stress-induced activation and inverse agonist-induced inactivation.     

Role of the His273 located in the sixth transmembrane domain of the angiotensin II receptor subtype AT2 in ligand-receptor interaction

Angiotensin II receptor subtypes AT1 and AT2 are proteins with seven transmembrane domain (TMD) topology and share 34% homology. It was shown that His256, located in the sixth TMD of the AT1 receptor, is needed for the agonist activation by the Phe8 side chain of angiotensin II, although replacing this residue with arginine or glutamine did not significantly alter the affinity binding of the receptor. We hypothesized that the His273 located in the sixth transmembrane domain of the AT2 receptor may play a similar role in the functions of the AT2 receptor, although this residue was not identified as a conserved residue in the initial homology comparisions. Therefore, we replaced His273 of the AT2 receptor with arginine or glutamine and analyzed the ligand-binding properties of the mutant receptors using Xenopus oocytes as an expression system. Our results suggested that the AT2 receptor mutants His273Arg and His273 Glu have lost their affinity to [125I-Sar1-Ile8]Ang II, a peptidic ligand that binds both the AT1 and AT2 receptors and to 125I-CGP42112A, a peptidic ligand that binds specifically to the AT2 receptor. Thus, His273 located in the sixth TMD of the AT2 receptor seems to play an important role in determining the binding properties of this receptor. Moreover, these results along with our previous observation that the Lys215 located in the 5th TMD of the AT2 receptor is essential for its high affinity binding to [125I-Sar1-Ile8]Ang II indicate that key amino acids located in the 5th and 6th TMDs of the AT2 receptor are needed for high affinity binding of the AT2 to its ligands.     

Activation of the AT1 angiotensin receptor is dependent on adjacent apolar residues in the carboxyl terminus of the third cytoplasmic loop

The C-terminal region of the third intracellular loop of the AT(1) angiotensin receptor (AT(1)-R) is an important determinant of G protein coupling. The roles of individual residues in agonist-induced activation of G(q/11)-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis were determined by mutational analysis of the amino acids in this region. Functional studies on mutant receptors transiently expressed in COS-7 cells showed that alanine substitutions of the amino acids in positions 232-240 of the third loop had no major effect on signal generation. However, deletion mutations that removed Ile(238) or affected its position relative to transmembrane helix VI significantly impaired angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate responses. Substitution of Ile(238) with an acidic residue abolished the ability of the receptor to mediate inositol phosphate production, whereas its replacement with basic or polar residues reduced the amplitude of inositol phosphate responses. Substitutions of Phe(239) with polar residues had relatively minor effects on inositol phosphate signal generation, but its replacement by aspartic acid reduced, and by positively charged residues (Lys, Arg) significantly increased, angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate responses. The internalization kinetics of the Ile(238) and Phe(239) mutant receptors were impaired in parallel with the reduction in their signaling responses. These findings have identified Ile(238) and Phe(239) as the critical residues in the C-terminal region of the third intracellular loop of the AT(1)-R for receptor activation. They also suggest that an apolar amino acid corresponding to Ile(238) of the AT(1)-R is a general requirement for activation of other G protein-coupled receptors by their agonist ligands.     

Structure-Guided Modification of Rhizomucor miehei Lipase for Production of Structured Lipids

To improve the performance of yeast surface-displayed Rhizomucor miehei lipase (RML) in the production of human milk fat substitute (HMFS), we mutated amino acids in the lipase substrate-binding pocket based on protein hydrophobicity, to improve esterification activity. Five mutants: Asn87Ile, Asn87Ile/Asp91Val, His108Leu/Lys109Ile, Asp256Ile/His257Leu, and His108Leu/Lys109Ile/Asp256Ile/His257Leu were obtained and their hydrolytic and esterification activities were assayed. Using Discovery Studio 3.1 to build models and calculate the binding energy between lipase and substrates, compared to wild-type, the mutant Asp256Ile/His257Leu was found to have significantly lower energy when oleic acid (3.97 KJ/mol decrease) and tripalmitin (7.55 KJ/mol decrease) were substrates. This result was in accordance with the esterification activity of Asp256Ile/His257Leu (2.37-fold of wild-type). The four mutants were also evaluated for the production of HMFS in organic solvent and in a solvent-free system. Asp256Ile/His257Leu had an oleic acid incorporation of 28.27% for catalyzing tripalmitin and oleic acid, and 53.18% for the reaction of palm oil with oleic acid. The efficiency of Asp256Ile/His257Leu was 1.82-fold and 1.65-fold that of the wild-type enzyme for the two reactions. The oleic acid incorporation of Asp256Ile/His257Leu was similar to commercial Lipozyme RM IM for palm oil acidolysis with oleic acid. Yeast surface-displayed RML mutant Asp256Ile/His257Leu is a potential, economically feasible catalyst for the production of structured lipids.     

Small molecules with similar structures exhibit agonist, neutral antagonist or inverse agonist activity toward angiotensin II type 1 receptor

Small differences in the chemical structures of ligands can be responsible for agonism, neutral antagonism or inverse agonism toward a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Although each ligand may stabilize the receptor conformation in a different way, little is known about the precise conformational differences. We synthesized the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, R239470 and R794847, which induced inverse agonism, antagonism and agonism, respectively, and then investigated the ligand-specific changes in the receptor conformation with respect to stabilization around transmembrane (TM)3. The results of substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies support the novel concept that ligand-induced changes in the conformation of TM3 play a role in stabilizing GPCR. Although the agonist-, neutral antagonist and inverse agonist-binding sites in the AT(1) receptor are similar, each ligand induced specific conformational changes in TM3. In addition, all of the experimental data were obtained with functional receptors in a native membrane environment (in situ).     

Identification of amino acid residues of rat angiotensin II receptor for ligand binding by site directed mutagenesis.

To determine the specific mechanism of ligand binding to angiotensin (Ang II) receptor AT1, mutagenized rat receptor cDNAs were expressed transiently in COS-7 cells and the effect of the mutations on the binding to peptidic and non-peptidic ligands was analyzed by Scatchard plots. Mutation of Lys199 to Gln in the intramembrane domain strongly reduced the affinity to both [125I] Ang II and [125I]-1Sar, 8Ile-Ang II whereas mutation of two other Lys had little effect, indicating involvement of Lys199 in binding ligands. Replacement of each of four Cys in the extracellular domain markedly reduced binding affinity, indicating the importance of two putative disulfide bridges in the formation of active receptor conformation. Substitution of Asp for Asn in N-glycosylation had no effect on ligand binding or expression of the receptor. These studies indicate mutated receptors are expressed in the plasma membrane and are amenable for further detailed studies.     

Molecular modeling of the oxytocin receptor/bioligand interactions

Oxytocin is a nonapeptide hormone (CYIQNCPLG-NH2, OT), controlling labor and lactation in mammalian females, via interactions with specific cellular membrane receptors (OTRs). The native hormone is cyclized via a 1-6 disulfide and its receptor belongs to the GTP-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, also known as heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) or serpentine receptors. Using a technique combining multiple sequence alignments with available experimental constraints, a reliable OTR model was built. Subsequently, the OTR complexes with a selective agonist [Thr4,Gly7]OT, a selective cyclohexapeptide antagonist L-366,948 and oxytocin itself were modeled and relaxed using a constrained simulated annealing (CSA) protocol. All three ligands seem to prefer similar modes of binding to the receptor, manifested by repeating receptor residues which directly interact with the ligands. Those involved in the three complexes are putative helices: TM3: R113, K116, Q119, M123; TM4: Q171, and TM5: I201 and T205. Most of them are the equivalent residues/positions to those found in our earlier studies, regarding related vasopressin V2 receptor/bioligand interactions.     

Identification of secretin,vasoactive intestinal peptide and glucagon binding sites: from chimaeric receptors to point mutations

We have identified two basic residues that are important for the recognition of secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) by their respective receptors. These two peptides containing an Asp residue at position 3 interacted with an arginine residue in transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) of the receptor, and the lysine residue in extracellular loop 1 (ECL1) stabilized the active receptor conformation induced by the ligand. The glucagon receptor possesses a Lys instead of an Arg in TM2, and an Ile instead of Lys in ECL1; it markedly prefers a Gln side chain in position 3 of the ligand. Our results suggested that, in the wild-type receptor, the Ile side chain prevented access to the TM2 Lys side chain, but oriented the glucagon Gln(3) side chain to its proper binding site. In the double mutant, the ECL1 Lys allowed an interaction between negatively charged residues in position 3 of glucagon and the TM2 Arg, resulting in efficient receptor activation by [Asp(3)]glucagon as well as by glucagon.