Loss of p14ARF in tumor cells facilitates replication of the adenovirus mutant dl1520 (ONYX-015)

The adenovirus mutant dl1520 (ONYX-015) does not express the E1B-55K protein that binds and inactivates p53. This virus replicates in tumor cells with mutant p53, but not in normal cells with functional p53. Although intra-tumoral injection of dl1520 shows promising responses in patients with solid tumors, previous in vitro studies have not established a close correlation between p53 status and dl1520 replication. Here we identify loss of p14ARF as a mechanism that allows dl1520 replication in tumor cells retaining wild-type p53. We demonstrate that the re-introduction of p14ARF into tumor cells with wild-type p53 suppresses replication of dl1520 in a p53-dependent manner. Our study supports the therapeutic use of dl1520 in tumors with lesions within the p53 pathway other than mutation of p53.     

Function of the adenovirus E1B oncogene in infected and transformed cells

Adenovirus infection and E1A gene expression stimulates cellular proliferation as a mechanism to facilitate virus replication. Programmed cell death (apoptosis) is the cellular response to this deregulation of growth control by E1A during viral infection and neoplastic transformation. To combat the suicidal elimination of virus infected cells by apoptosis, adenovirus has evolved a mechanism to disengage the apoptotic program of the cell. This anti-apoptotic function is encoded within the adenovirus E1B 19 kDa and 55 kDa gene products. Both viral products encoded by E1B act at independent and overlapping points in the cell death process to ensure that the premature death of the host cell does not take place and that viral infection can progress to completion. The E1B 55K protein functions as an anti-apoptotic gene product by direct physical interference with the p53 tumor suppressor protein, whereas the E1B 19K protein acts to inhibit p53-dependent and probably p53-independent apoptosis by a mechanism that resembles that of the human bcl-2 protooncogene.     

p14ARF inhibits the growth of p53 deficient cells in a cell-specific manner

While p14(ARF) suppression of tumorigenesis in a p53-dependent manner is well studied, the mechanism by which p14(ARF) inhibits tumorigenesis independently of p53 remains elusive. A variety of factors have been reported to play a role in this latter process. We report here that p14(ARF) displays different effects on the anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of p53-null/Mdm2 wild type cells. p14(ARF) blocks both the anchorage-dependent and-independent (soft agar) proliferation of 293T and p53(-/-) HCT116, but not p53-null H1299 lung carcinoma cells. While p14(ARF) had no effect on the anchorage-dependent proliferation of p53(-/-) MEFs and Ras12V-transformed p53(-/-) MEFs, it inhibited the growth of Ras12V-transformed p53(-/-) MEFs in soft agar. Furthermore, ectopic expression of p14(ARF) did not lead to degradation of the E2F1 protein and did not result in the reduction of E2F1 activity detected by two E2F1 responsible promoters, Apaf1 and p14(ARF) promoter, in 293T, p53(-/-) HCT116, and H1299 cells. This is consistent with our observations that p14(ARF) did not result in G1 arrest, but induced apoptosis via Bax up-regulation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the response of p53-null cells to ARF is cell type dependent and involves factors other than Mdm2 and E2F1.     

p14ARF activates a Tip60-dependent and p53-independent ATM/ATR/CHK pathway in response to genotoxic stress

p14ARF is a tumor suppressor that controls a well-described p53/Mdm2-dependent checkpoint in response to oncogenic signals. Here, new insights into the tumor-suppressive function of p14ARF are provided. We previously showed that p14ARF can induce a p53-independent G2 cell cycle arrest. In this study, we demonstrate that the activation of ATM/ATR/CHK signaling pathways contributes to this G2 checkpoint and highlight the interrelated roles of p14ARF and the Tip60 protein in the initiation of this DNA damage-signaling cascade. We show that Tip60 is a new direct p14ARF binding partner and that its expression is upregulated and required for ATM/CHK2 activation in response to p14ARF. Strikingly, both p14ARF and Tip60 products accumulate following a cell treatment with alkylating agents and are absolutely required for ATM/CHK2 activation in this setting. Moreover, and consistent with p14ARF being a determinant of CHK2 phosphorylation in lung carcinogenesis, a strong correlation between p14ARF and phospho-CHK2 (Thr68) protein expression is observed in human lung tumors (P < 0.00006). Overall, these data point to a novel regulatory pathway that mediates the p53-independent negative-cell-growth control of p14ARF. Inactivation of this pathway is likely to contribute to lung carcinogenesis.     

ARF directly binds DP1: interaction with DP1 coincides with the G1 arrest function of ARF

The tumor suppressor ARF inhibits cell growth in response to oncogenic stress in a p53-dependent manner. Also, there is an increasing appreciation of ARF's ability to inhibit cell growth via multiple p53-independent mechanisms, including its ability to regulate the E2F pathway. We have investigated the interaction between the tumor suppressor ARF and DP1, the DNA binding partner of the E2F family of factors (E2Fs). We show that ARF directly binds to DP1. Interestingly, binding of ARF to DP1 results in an inhibition of the interaction between DP1 and E2F1. Moreover, ARF regulates the association of DP1 with its target gene, as evidenced by a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay with the dhfr promoter. By analyzing a series of ARF mutants, we demonstrate a strong correlation between ARF's ability to regulate DP1 and its ability to cause cell cycle arrest. S-phase inhibition by ARF is preceded by an inhibition of the E2F-activated genes. Moreover, we provide evidence that ARF inhibits the E2F-activated genes independently of p53 and Mdm2. Also, the interaction between ARF and DP1 is enhanced during oncogenic stress and "culture shock." Taken together, our results show that DP1 is a critical direct target of ARF.     

Apoptosis induced by adenovirus-mediated p14ARF expression in U2OS osteosarcoma cells is associated with increased Fas expression

The INK4A/ARF locus on chromosome 9 is a tumor suppressor gene frequently mutated in human cancers. In order to study the effects of p14ARF expression in tumor cells, we constructed a recombinant adenovirus containing p14ARF cDNA (Adp14ARF). Adp14ARF infection of U2OS osteosarcoma cells which has wild type p53 and mutant p14ARF revealed high levels of p14 (ARF) expression within 24h. In addition, Adp14ARF-mediated expressing of p14 (ARF) was associated with increased levels of p53, p21, and mdm2 protein. Growth inhibition assays following Adp14ARF infection demonstrated that the growth of U2OS cells was inhibited relative to infection with control virus. Furthermore, TUNEL analysis as well as PARP cleavage assays demonstrated that Adp14ARF infection was associated with increased apoptosis in U2OS cell line and that it was associated with Adp14ARF induced overexpression of Fas and Fas-L. Addition of Fas-L neutralizing antibody NOK-1 decreased Adp14-mediated cell death, indicating that p14 (ARF) induction of the Fas pathway is associated with increased apoptosis. The finding that Adp14ARF infection did not induce Fas expression in U2OS/E6 and MCF/E6 cells suggests that wild type p53 expression may be necessary for Adp14ARF-mediated induction of Fas. The observation that overexpression of p53 by Adp53 infection in MCF-7 does not induce increased Fas protein levels nor apoptotic cell death suggests that p53 overexpression is required but not sufficient enough for apoptosis. These studies suggest there are other mechanisms other than induction of p53 in ARF-mediated apoptosis and gene therapy using Adp14ARF may be a promising treatment option for human cancers containing wild type p53 and mutant or deleted p14 expression.     

ARF triggers cell G1 arrest by a P53 independent ERK pathway

In this study, in order to investigate the p53-independent function of p14ARF, we established p14ARF-inducible clones in the p53-deficient HCT cell line using the doxycycline-inducible expression system. A strong cell growth inhibition and G1/S arrest were observed after doxycycline induction in p53-/-HCT cells, and the cells also exhibited an obvious decrease of DNA synthesis. We further examined if the MEK/ERK pathway is involved in the G1 arrest induced by p14ARF in p53-/-HCT cells. The results indicate that ERK1/2 and p21 were activated upon p14ARF induction. Totally, the functional roles of ERK and p21 for ARF in p53-independent tumor suppression were demonstrated.     

p14ARF induces G2 cell cycle arrest in p53- and p21-deficient cells by down-regulating p34cdc2 kinase activity

The human INK4a gene locus encodes two structurally unrelated tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF). Although primarily proposed to require a functional p53.Mdm-2 signaling axis, recently p14(ARF) has been implicated in p53-independent cell cycle regulation. Here we show that p14(ARF) preferentially induces a G(2) arrest in tumor cells lacking functional p53 and/or p21. Expression of p14(ARF) impaired mitotic entry and enforced a primarily cytoplasmic localization of p34(cdc2) that was associated with a decrease in p34(cdc2) kinase activity and reduced p34(cdc2) protein expression. A direct physical interaction between p14(ARF) and p34(cdc2) was, nevertheless, ruled out by lack of co-immunoprecipitation. The p14(ARF)-induced depletion of p34(cdc2) was associated with impaired cdc25C phosphatase expression and a prominent shift to inhibitory Tyr-15-phosphorylation in G(2)-arrested cells lacking either p53, p21, or both. Finally, reconstitution of p34(cdc2) using a constitutively active, phosphorylation-deficient p34(cdc2AF) mutant alleviated this p14(ARF)-induced G(2) arrest, thereby allowing cell cycle progression. Taken together, these data indicate that p14(ARF) arrests cells lacking functional p53/p21 in the G(2) phase of the cell cycle by targeting p34(cdc2) kinase. This may represent an important fail-safe mechanism by which p14(ARF) protects p53/p21-deficient cells from unrestrained proliferation.     

Residues in the alternative reading frame tumor suppressor that influence its stability and p53-independent activities

The Alternative Reading Frame (ARF) protein suppresses tumorigenesis through p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways. Most of ARF's anti-proliferative activity is conferred by sequences in its first exon. Previous work showed specific amino acid changes occurred in that region during primate evolution, so we programmed those changes into human p14ARF to assay their functional impact. Two human p14ARF residues (Ala¹⁴ and Thr³¹) were found to destabilize the protein while two others (Val²⁴ and Ala⁴¹) promoted more efficient p53 stabilization and activation. Despite those effects, all modified p14ARF forms displayed robust p53-dependent anti-proliferative activity demonstrating there are no significant biological differences in p53-mediated growth suppression associated with simian versus human p14ARF residues. In contrast, p53-independent p14ARF function was considerably altered by several residue changes. Val²⁴ was required for p53-independent growth suppression whereas multiple residues (Val²⁴, Thr³¹, Ala⁴¹ and His⁶⁰) enabled p14ARF to block or reverse the inherent chromosomal instability of p53-null MEFs. Together, these data pinpoint specific residues outside of established p14ARF functional domains that influence its expression and signaling activities. Most intriguingly, this work reveals a novel and direct role for p14ARF in the p53-independent maintenance of genomic stability.     

Evidence that replication of the antitumor adenovirus ONYX-015 is not controlled by the p53 and p14(ARF) tumor suppressor genes

The adenovirus mutant ONYX-015 is in phase III clinical trials as a novel antitumor therapy. Its apparent efficacy is thought to be due to its ability to replicate selectively in tumor cells defective in the signaling pathway for p53. Recent data have shown that p14(ARF), a positive regulator of p53, inhibits ONYX-015 replication in cells with a wild-type p53, a phenotype that characterizes normal cells. We, however, found that ONYX-015 activates p53 in tumor cells and in normal cells and that this can occur without p14(ARF) induction. We also show that ONYX-015 is not attenuated in cells with functional p53, whether or not p14(ARF) is expressed, and that where attenuation does occur, it is cell type specific.     

MdmX represses E2F1 transactivation

Based on knockout mouse studies, Mdm2 and MdmX have been identified as critical regulators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, at least during early development. While many of the functions attributed to Mdm2 and MdmX involve p53 and overexpression of each gene appears to have oncogenic activities, a number of studies have suggested that each protein also possesses p53-independent functions. While examining the effect of Mdm2 overexpression on E2F1 transactivation we uncovered a novel MdmX function, the ability to inhibit E2F1 transactivation in a p53 and Mdm2 independent manner. Using a series of MdmX deletion mutants the central region of MdmX, amino acids 128-444 appears to possess the repressive domain. While an in vivo association of MdmX with either E2F1 or DP1 was not observed, a slight reduction in DP1 and an increased cytoplasmic localization of E2F1 were seen in cells overexpressing MdmX. These results suggest that elevated MdmX expression may repress E2F1-regulated genes like p14ARF and thus represent another regulatory mechanism in the Rb-p53 signaling pathway.     

p14ARF interacts with DAXX: Effects on HDM2 and p53

The p14ARF (ARF) tumour suppressor plays an important role in the cellular response to oncogene activation. In this report, we demonstrate an interaction between ARF and DAXX, a highly conserved protein with identified roles in the regulation of gene expression. HDM2 was shown to interact with each of ARF and DAXX upon upregulation of expression as well as at lower expression levels following transfection of ARF and DAXX. Through immunofluorescence analysis, we observed that endogenous ARF and DAXX colocalize both to nucleoli and to nuclear bodies in cell lines that co-express both proteins. Similar results were obtained upon co-transfection of ARF and DAXX. Co-expression of ARF and DAXX was further found to inhibit ARF-mediated HDM2 sumoylation and to induce sumoylation and ubiquitination of DAXX itself, implicating DAXX as a substrate of ARF-mediated post-translational events. We also observed induction of p53 sumoylation in the presence of ARF and DAXX, an effect that was inhibited by upregulation of HDM2 expression. In summary, we have identified DAXX as a novel ARF binding partner and substrate of ARF-mediated sumoylation and suggest that DAXX acts as a modifier of both p53-dependent and p53-independent ARF function.     

MdmX Represses E2F1 Transactivation

Based on knockout mouse studies, Mdm2 and MdmX have been identified as critical regulators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, at least during early development. While many of the functions attributed to Mdm2 and MdmX involve p53 and overexpression of each gene appears to have oncogenic activities, a number of studies have suggested that each protein also possesses p53-independent functions. While examining the effect of Mdm2 overexpression on E2F1 transactivation we uncovered a novel MdmX function, the ability to inhibit E2F1 transactivation in a p53 and Mdm2 independent manner. Using a series of MdmX deletion mutants the central region of MdmX, amino acids 128-444 appears to possess the repressive domain. While an in vivo association of MdmX with either E2F1 or DP1 was not observed, a slight reduction in DP1 and an increased cytoplasmic localization of E2F1 were seen in cells overexpressing MdmX. These results suggest that elevated MdmX expression may repress E2F1-regulated genes like p14ARF and thus represent another regulatory mechanism in the Rb-p53 signaling pathway.     

Tumor suppressor ARF promotes non-classic proteasome-independent polyubiquitination of COMMD1

Although the tumor suppressor ARF is generally accepted for its essential role in activating the p53 pathway, its p53-independent function has also been proposed. Here, we report that ARF associates with COMMD1 and promotes Lys(63)-mediated polyubiquitination of COMMD1 in a p53-independent manner. We found that ARF interacts with COMMD1 in vivo. Deletion analysis of ARF suggested that the N-terminal amino acids 15-45 are important for its interaction with COMMD1. In addition, we found that endogenous ARF redistributes from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm and interacts with COMMD1 when DNA is damaged by actinomycin D. Interestingly, we found that ARF promotes the polyubiquitination of COMMD1 through Lys(63) of ubiquitin but not the polyubiquitination of Lys(48), which does not target COMMD1 for proteasome-dependent proteolysis. Moreover, ARF mutants lacking the domain interacting with COMMD1 did not promote COMMD1 polyubiquitination, indicating that physical association is a prerequisite condition for the polyubiquitination process. Together, these data suggest that the ability to promote Lys(63)-mediated polyubiquitination of COMMD1 is a novel property of ARF independent of p53.     

p300 binding by E1A cosegregates with p53 induction but is dispensable for apoptosis.

E1A expression during adenovirus infection induces apoptosis. E1A expression causes accumulation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, and E1A-induced apoptosis is p53 mediated in primary rodent cells, implying that p53 induction may be linked to apoptosis induction by E1A. Adenoviruses containing mutations in the E1A gene were tested for the ability to trigger both p53 accumulation and the appearance of enhanced cytopathy (cyt phenotype) and degradation of DNA (deg phenotype), indicative of apoptosis in infected HeLa cells. The adenoviruses had mutations which disrupted the pRb- and/or p300-binding activities of E1A so that the relationship between p53 induction and apoptosis and binding to these cellular proteins by E1A could be determined. An E1A mutation that specifically disrupted the p300-binding activity failed to induce p53 accumulation, whereas mutations in E1A which affected pRb binding induced p53 accumulation. Thus, p300 binding was required and pRb binding was dispensable for E1A-mediated accumulation of p53 in HeLa cells. All the E1A mutant viruses, regardless of the ability to induce p53 accumulation, induced the cyt and deg phenotypes, suggesting that p53 induction in infected HeLa cells was not essential for apoptosis, nor was binding of E1A to the pRb and/or p300 protein. The possibility that E1A induced a p53-independent apoptosis pathway was tested by analyzing the appearance of the cyt and deg phenotypes in Saos-2 cells, which were null for both alleles of p53, upon adenovirus infection. An adenovirus expressing wild-type 12S E1A induced both the cyt and deg phenotypes in Saos-2 cells, as did all the E1A mutant viruses. Thus, E1A expression during infection of human cells may trigger redundant p53-independent and -dependent apoptotic pathways.