Effects of the bacteriophage T4 dda protein on DNA synthesis catalyzed by purified T4 replication proteins

The T4 bacteriophage dda protein is a DNA-dependent ATPase and DNA helicase that is the product of an apparently nonessential T4 gene. We have examined its effects on in vitro DNA synthesis catalyzed by a purified, multienzyme T4 DNA replication system. When DNA synthesis is catalyzed by the T4 DNA polymerase on a single-stranded DNA template, the addition of the dda protein is without effect whether or not other replication proteins are present. In contrast, on a double-stranded DNA template, where a mixture of the DNA polymerase, its accessory proteins, and the gene 32 protein is required, the dda protein greatly stimulates DNA synthesis. The dda protein exerts this effect by speeding up the rate of replication fork movement; in this respect, it acts identically with the other DNA helicase in the T4 replication system, the T4 gene 41 protein. However, whereas a 41 protein molecule remains bound to the same replication fork for a prolonged period, the dda protein seems to be continually dissociating from the replication fork and rebinding to it as the fork moves. Some gene 32 protein is required to observe DNA synthesis on a double-stranded DNA template, even in the presence of the dda protein. However, there is a direct competition between this helix-destabilizing protein and the dda protein for binding to single-stranded DNA, causing the rate of replication fork movement to decrease at a high ratio of gene 32 protein to dda protein. As shown elsewhere, the dda protein becomes absolutely required for in vitro DNA synthesis when E. coli RNA polymerase molecules are bound to the DNA template, because these molecules otherwise stop fork movement (Bedinger, P., Hochstrasser, M., Jongeneel, C.V., and Alberts, B. M. (1983) Cell 34, 115-123).     

Dual functions of single-stranded DNA-binding protein in helicase loading at the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication fork

Semi-conservative DNA synthesis reactions catalyzed by the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme are initiated by a strand displacement mechanism requiring gp32, the T4 single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, to sequester the displaced strand. After initiation, DNA helicase acquisition by the nascent replication fork leads to a dramatic increase in the rate and processivity of leading strand DNA synthesis. In vitro studies have established that either of two T4-encoded DNA helicases, gp41 or dda, is capable of stimulating strand displacement synthesis. The acquisition of either helicase by the nascent replication fork is modulated by other protein components of the fork including gp32 and, in the case of the gp41 helicase, its mediator/loading protein gp59. Here, we examine the relationships between gp32 and the gp41/gp59 and dda helicase systems, respectively, during T4 replication using altered forms of gp32 defective in either protein-protein or protein-ssDNA interactions. We show that optimal stimulation of DNA synthesis by gp41/gp59 helicase requires gp32-gp59 interactions and is strongly dependent on the stability of ssDNA binding by gp32. Fluorescence assays demonstrate that gp59 binds stoichiometrically to forked DNA molecules; however, gp59-forked DNA complexes are destabilized via protein-protein interactions with the C-terminal "A-domain" fragment of gp32. These and previously published results suggest a model in which a mobile gp59-gp32 cluster bound to lagging strand ssDNA is the target for gp41 helicase assembly. In contrast, stimulation of DNA synthesis by dda helicase requires direct gp32-dda protein-protein interactions and is relatively unaffected by mutations in gp32 that destabilize its ssDNA binding activity. The latter data support a model in which protein-protein interactions with gp32 maintain dda in a proper active state for translocation at the replication fork. The relationship between dda and gp32 proteins in T4 replication appears similar to the relationship observed between the UL9 helicase and ICP8 ssDNA-binding protein in herpesvirus replication.     

Bacteriophage T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein binds replication fork DNA. The 1.45 A resolution crystal structure reveals a novel alpha-helical two-domain fold

The bacteriophage T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein is required for recombination-dependent DNA replication, which is the predominant mode of DNA replication in the late stage of T4 infection. T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein accelerates the loading of the T4 gene 41 helicase during DNA synthesis by the T4 replication system in vitro. T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein binds to both T4 gene 41 helicase and T4 gene 32 single-stranded DNA binding protein, and to single and double-stranded DNA. We show here that T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein binds most tightly to fork DNA substrates, with either single or almost entirely double-stranded arms. Our studies suggest that the helicase assembly protein is responsible for loading T4 gene 41 helicase specifically at replication forks, and that its binding sites for each arm must hold more than six, but not more than 12 nucleotides. The 1.45 A resolution crystal structure of the full-length 217-residue monomeric T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein reveals a novel alpha-helical bundle fold with two domains of similar size. Surface residues are predominantly basic (pI 9.37) with clusters of acidic residues but exposed hydrophobic residues suggest sites for potential contact with DNA and with other protein molecules. The N-terminal domain has structural similarity to the double-stranded DNA binding domain of rat HMG1A. We propose a speculative model of how the T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein might bind to fork DNA based on the similarity to HMG1, the location of the basic and hydrophobic regions, and the site size of the fork arms needed for tight fork DNA binding. The fork-binding model suggests putative binding sites for the T4 gene 32 single-stranded DNA binding protein and for the hexameric T4 gene 41 helicase assembly.     

DNA synthesis at a fork in the presence of DNA helicases

In a mixture of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, single-strand-binding protein, artificially forked lambda bacteriophage DNA with primer annealed to the leading side of the fork, dNTPs and ATP, DNA synthesis is enhanced by helicase II, less so by helicases, I, III or rep protein of E. coli or T4 phage helicase. The effect of helicase II depends on ATP, it is enhanced by helicase III, and it is not observed using DNA polymerase I or T4 DNA polymerase. In the absence of dNTPs helicase II is less active than helicase I or T4 helicase in unwinding the forked DNA. We believe that helicase II both shifts the forks and stimulates DNA polymerase III. The results support the conclusion derived from previous studies that helicase II is part of the DNA-synthesizing system of E. coli.     

Molecular mechanisms of the functional coupling of the helicase (gp41) and polymerase (gp43) of bacteriophage T4 within the DNA replication fork

Processive strand-displacement DNA synthesis with the T4 replication system requires functional "coupling" between the DNA polymerase (gp43) and the helicase (gp41). To define the physical basis of this functional coupling, we have used analytical ultracentrifugation to show that gp43 is a monomeric species at physiological protein concentrations and that gp41 and gp43 do not physically interact in the absence of DNA, suggesting that the functional coupling between gp41 and gp43 depends significantly on interactions modulated by the replication fork DNA. Results from strand-displacement DNA synthesis show that a minimal gp41-gp43 replication complex can perform strand-displacement synthesis at approximately 90 nts/s in a solution containing poly(ethylene glycol) to drive helicase loading. In contrast, neither the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I nor the T7 DNA polymerase, both of which are nonprocessive polymerases, can carry out strand-displacement DNA synthesis with gp41, suggesting that the functional helicase-polymerase coupling may require the homologous system. However, we show that a heterologous helicase-polymerase pair can work if the polymerase is processive. Strand-displacement DNA synthesis using the gp41 helicase with the T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme or the phage T7 DNA polymerase-thioredoxin complex, both of which are processive, proceeds at the rate of approximately 250 nts/s. However, replication fork assembly is less efficient with the heterologous helicase-polymerase pair. Therefore, a processive (homologous or heterologous) "trailing" DNA polymerase is sufficient to improve gp41 processivity and unwinding activity in the elongation stage of the helicase reaction, and specific T4 helicase-polymerase coupling becomes significant only in the assembly (or initiation) stage.     

Characterization of the DNA-dependent GTPase activity of T4 gene 41 protein, an essential component of the T4 bacteriophage DNA replication apparatus

The product specified by T4 bacteriophage gene 41 is known from genetic analyses to be essential for phage DNA replication in vivo. Correspondingly, the purified gene 41 protein is an essential component of an efficient in vitro DNA replication system reconstructed from seven purified T4 replication proteins; it is required both for the synthesis of short RNA primers (in conjunction with the T4 gene 61 protein) and for the rapid unwinding of the double-helical DNA template at a replication fork. The purified gene 41 protein exhibits a DNA-dependent GTPase (and ATPase) activity. In this report, we have used this associated GTPase activity as a biochemical probe for the analysis of the interactions between DNA and the 41 protein. Our results suggest that, upon binding GTP, the 41 protein monomer is induced to form a dimer, which can them form a tight complex with single-stranded DNA. Driven by the repeated hydrolysis of GTP molecules, the 41 protein dimer appears to run rapidly along the bound DNA chain. Studies with the synthetic GTP analogue, GTP gamma S, suggest that GTP hydrolysis is required for this 41 protein movement, but that it is not essential for the function of the 41 protein in RNA primer synthesis. In sum, our observations suggest that a 41 protein dimer runs along the lagging strand template at a DNA replication fork; from this position, it functions as a DNA helicase and simultaneously interacts with the T4 gene 61 protein to make the pentaribonucleotide primers which initiate Okazaki pieces at specific primer initiation sites.     

Mutational analysis of the T4 gp59 helicase loader reveals its sites for interaction with helicase, single-stranded binding protein, and DNA

Efficient DNA replication involves coordinated interactions among DNA polymerase, multiple factors, and the DNA. From bacteriophage T4 to eukaryotes, these factors include a helicase to unwind the DNA ahead of the replication fork, a single-stranded binding protein (SSB) to bind to the ssDNA on the lagging strand, and a helicase loader that associates with the fork, helicase, and SSB. The previously reported structure of the helicase loader in the T4 system, gene product (gp)59, has revealed an N-terminal domain, which shares structural homology with the high mobility group (HMG) proteins from eukaryotic organisms. Modeling of this structure with fork DNA has suggested that the HMG-like domain could bind to the duplex DNA ahead of the fork, whereas the C-terminal portion of gp59 would provide the docking sites for helicase (T4 gp41), SSB (T4 gp32), and the ssDNA fork arms. To test this model, we have used random and targeted mutagenesis to generate mutations throughout gp59. We have assayed the ability of the mutant proteins to bind to fork, primed fork, and ssDNAs, to interact with SSB, to stimulate helicase activity, and to function in leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Our results provide strong biochemical support for the role of the N-terminal gp59 HMG motif in fork binding and the interaction of the C-terminal portion of gp59 with helicase and SSB. Our results also suggest that processive replication may involve the switching of gp59 between its interactions with helicase and SSB.     

Functional aspects of Escherichia coli rep helicase in unwinding and replication of DNA

The gene for Escherichia coli rep helicase (rep protein) was subcloned in a pBR plasmid and the protein overproduced in cells transformed with the hybrid DNA. The effect of purified enzyme on strand unwinding and DNA replication was investigated by electron microscopy. The templates used were partial duplexes of viral DNA from bacteriophage fd::Tn5 and reannealed DNA from bacteriophage Mu. The experiments with the two DNA species show DNA unwinding uncoupled from replication. The single-stranded phage fd::Tn5 DNA with the inverted repeat of transposon Tn5 could be completely replicated in the presence of the E. coli enzymes rep helicase, DNA binding protein I, RNA polymerase and DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. A block in the unwinding step increases secondary initiation events in single-stranded parts of the template, as DNA polymerase III holoenzyme cannot switch across the stem structure of the transposon.     

Characterization of the bacteriophage T4 gene 41 DNA helicase

The T4 gene 41 protein and the gene 61 protein function together as a primase-helicase within the seven protein bacteriophage T4 multienzyme complex that replicates duplex DNA in vitro. We have previously shown that the 41 protein is a 5' to 3' helicase that requires a single-stranded region on the 5' side of the duplex to be unwound and is stimulated by the 61 protein (Venkatesan, M., Silver L. L., and Nossal, N. G. (1982) J. biol. Chem. 257, 12426-12434). The 41 protein, in turn, is required for pentamer primer synthesis by the 61 protein. We now show that the 41 protein helicase unwinds a partially duplex DNA molecule containing a performed fork more efficiently than a DNA molecule without a fork. Optimal helicase activity requires greater than 29 nucleotides of single-stranded DNA on the 3' side of the duplex (analogous to the leading strand template). This result suggests the 41 protein helicase interacts with the leading strand template as well as the lagging strand template as it unwinds the duplex region at the replication fork. As the single-stranded DNA on the 3' side of a short duplex (51 base pairs) is lengthened, the stimulation of the 41 protein helicase by the 61 protein is diminished. However, both the 61 protein and a preformed fork are essential for efficient unwinding of longer duplex regions (650 base pairs). These findings suggest that the 61 protein promotes both the initial unwinding of the duplex to form a fork and subsequent unwinding of longer duplexes by the 41 protein. A stable protein-DNA complex, detected by a gel mobility shift of phi X174 single-stranded DNA, requires both the 41 and 61 proteins and a rNTP (preferably rATP or rGTP, the nucleotides with the greatest effect on the helicase activity). In the accompanying paper, we report the altered properties of a proteolytic fragment of the 41 protein helicase and its effect on in vitro DNA synthesis in the T4 multienzyme replication system.     

Interactions of bacteriophage T4-coded primase (gp61) with the T4 replication helicase (gp41) and DNA in primosome formation.

One primase (gp61) and six helicase (gp41) subunits interact to form the bacteriophage T4-coded primosome at the DNA replication fork. In order to map some of the detailed interactions of the primase within the primosome, we have constructed and characterized variants of the gp61 primase that carry kinase tags at either the N or the C terminus of the polypeptide chain. These tagged gp61 constructs have been probed using several analytical methods. Proteolytic digestion and protein kinase protection experiments show that specific interactions with single-stranded DNA and the T4 helicase hexamer significantly protect both the N- and the C-terminal regions of the T4 primase polypeptide chain against modification by these procedures and that this protection becomes more pronounced when the primase is assembled within the complete ternary primosome complex. Additional discrete sites of both protection and apparent hypersensitivity along the gp61 polypeptide chain have also been mapped by proteolytic footprinting reactions for the binary helicase-primase complex and in the three component primosome. These studies provide a detailed map of a number of gp61 contact positions within the primosome and reveal interactions that may be important in the structure and function of this central component of the T4 DNA replication complex.     

Bacteriophage T4 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand synthesis when the helicase is loaded by the T4 59 helicase-loading protein

In the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system, T4 gene 59 protein binds preferentially to fork DNA and accelerates the loading of the T4 41 helicase. 59 protein also binds the T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein that coats the lagging strand template. Here we explore the function of the strong affinity between the 32 and 59 proteins at the replication fork. We show that, in contrast to the 59 helicase loader, 32 protein does not bind forked DNA more tightly than linear DNA. 32 protein displays a strong binding polarity on fork DNA, binding with much higher affinity to the 5' single-stranded lagging strand template arm of a model fork, than to the 3' single-stranded leading strand arm. 59 protein promotes the binding of 32 protein on forks too short for cooperative binding by 32 protein. We show that 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand DNA synthesis when the helicase is loaded by 59 protein. However, 32 protein is not required for leading strand synthesis when helicase is loaded, less efficiently, without 59 protein. Leading strand synthesis by wild type T4 polymerase is strongly inhibited when 59 protein is present without 32 protein. Because 59 protein can load the helicase on forks without 32 protein, our results are best explained by a model in which 59 helicase loader at the fork prevents the coupling of the leading strand polymerase and the helicase, unless the position of 59 protein is shifted by its association with 32 protein.     

Prokaryotic DNA replication mechanisms

The three different prokaryotic replication systems that have been most extensively studied use the same basic components for moving a DNA replication fork, even though the individual proteins are different and lack extensive amino acid sequence homology. In the T4 bacteriophage system, the components of the DNA replication complex can be grouped into functional classes as follows: DNA polymerase (gene 43 protein), helix-destabilizing protein (gene 32 protein), polymerase accessory proteins (gene 44/62 and 45 proteins), and primosome proteins (gene 41 DNA helicase and gene 61 RNA primase). DNA synthesis in the in vitro system starts by covalent addition onto the 3'OH end at a random nick on a double-stranded DNA template and proceeds to generate a replication fork that moves at about the in vivo rate, and with approximately the in vivo base-pairing fidelity. DNA is synthesized at the fork in a continuous fashion on the leading strand and in a discontinuous fashion on the lagging strand (generating short Okazaki fragments with 5'-linked pppApCpXpYpZ pentaribonucleotide primers). Kinetic studies reveal that the DNA polymerase molecule on the lagging strand stays associated with the fork as it moves. Therefore the DNA template on the lagging strand must be folded so that the stop site for the synthesis of one Okazaki fragment is adjacent to the start site for the next such fragment, allowing the polymerase and other replication proteins on the lagging strand to recycle.     

Trypsin cleavage in the COOH terminus of the bacteriophage T4 gene 41 DNA helicase alters the primase-helicase activities of the T4 replication complex in vitro

The bacteriophage T4 gene 41 protein is a 5' to 3' DNA helicase which unwinds DNA ahead of the growing replication fork and, together with the T4 gene 61 protein, also functions as a primase to initiate DNA synthesis on the lagging strand. Proteolytic cleavage by trypsin approximately 20 amino acids from the COOH terminus of the 41 protein produces 41T, a 51,500-dalton fragment (possibly still associated with small COOH-terminal fragments) which still retains the ssDNA-stimulated GTPase (ATPase) activity, the 61 protein-stimulated DNA helicase activity, and the ability to act with 61 protein to synthesize pentaribonucleotide primers. In the absence of the T4 gene 32 ssDNA binding protein, the primase-helicase composed of the tryptic fragment (41T) and 61 proteins efficiently primes DNA synthesis on circular ssDNA templates by the T4 DNA polymerase and the three T4 polymerase accessory proteins. In contrast, the 41T protein is defective as a helicase or a primase component on 32 protein-covered DNA. Thus, unlike the intact protein, 41T does not support RNA-dependent DNA synthesis on 32 protein-covered ssDNA and does not stimulate strand displacement DNA synthesis on a nicked duplex DNA template. High concentrations of 32 protein strongly inhibit RNA primer synthesis with either 41 T or intact 41 protein. The 44/62 and 45 polymerase accessory proteins (and even the 44/62 proteins to some extent) substantially reverse the 32 protein inhibition of RNA primer synthesis with intact 41 protein but not with 41T protein. We propose that the COOH-terminal region of the 41 protein is required for its interaction with the T4 polymerase accessory proteins, permitting the synthesis and utilization of RNA primers and helicase function within the T4 replication complex. When this region is altered, as in 41T protein, the protein is unable to assemble a functional primase-helicase in the replication complex. An easy and rapid purification of T4 41 protein produced by a plasmid encoding this gene (Hinton, D. M., Silver, L. L., and Nossal, N. G. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12851-12857) is also described.     

Mechanism of stimulation of T7 DNA polymerase by Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB)

Single-stranded DNA binding protein is a key component in growth of bacteriophage T7. In addition, DNA synthesis by the purified in vitro replication system is markedly stimulated when the DNA template is coated with Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). In an attempt to understand the mechanism for this stimulation, we have studied the effect of E. coli SSB on DNA synthesis by the T7 DNA polymerase using a primed single-stranded M13 DNA template which serves as a model for T7 lagging strand DNA synthesis. Polyacrylamide gel analysis of the DNA product synthesized on this template in the absence of SSB indicated that the T7 DNA polymerase pauses at many specific sites, some stronger than others. By comparing the position of pausing with the DNA sequence of this region and by using a DNA template that contains an extremely stable hairpin structure, it was found that many, but not all, of these pause positions correspond to regions of potential secondary structure. The presence of SSB during synthesis resulted in a large reduction in the frequency of hesitations at many sites that correspond to these secondary structures. However, the facts that a large percentage of the pause sites remain unaffected even at saturating levels of SSB and that SSB stimulates synthesis on a singly primed poly(dA) template suggested that other mechanisms also contribute to the stimulation of DNA synthesis caused by SSB. Using a sucrose gradient analysis, we found that SSB increases the affinity of the polymerase for single-stranded DNA that this increased binding is only noticed when the polymerase concentration is limiting. The effect of this difference in polymerase affinity was clearly observed by a polyacrylamide gel analysis of the product DNA synthesized during a limited DNA synthesis reaction using conditions where only two nucleotides are added to the primer. Under these circumstances, where the presence of hairpin structures should not contribute to the stimulatory effect of SSB, we found that the extension of the primer is stimulated 4-fold if the DNA template is coated with SSB. Furthermore, SSB had no effect on this synthesis at large polymerase to template ratios.     

Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication

Little is known about the architecture and biochemical composition of the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. To study this problem, we used biotin-streptavidin-modified plasmids to induce sequence-specific replication fork pausing in Xenopus egg extracts. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was employed to identify factors associated with the paused fork. This approach identifies DNA pol alpha, DNA pol delta, DNA pol varepsilon, MCM2-7, Cdc45, GINS, and Mcm10 as components of the vertebrate replisome. In the presence of the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin, which causes uncoupling of a highly processive DNA helicase from the stalled replisome, only Cdc45, GINS, and MCM2-7 are enriched at the pause site. The data suggest the existence of a large molecular machine, the "unwindosome," which separates DNA strands at the replication fork and contains Cdc45, GINS, and the MCM2-7 holocomplex.     

Crawling and wiggling on DNA: structural insights to the mechanism of DNA unwinding by helicases

Crystal structures have recently been solved of the monomeric DNA helicase PcrA bound to forked DNA, and of the hexameric helicase domain of the bacteriophage T7 gene 4 protein, a replication fork DNA helicase/primase. These structures have led to the elaboration of the first molecular models to describe DNA helicase action.     

Mutations of bacteriophage T4 59 helicase loader defective in binding fork DNA and in interactions with T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein

Bacteriophage T4 gene 59 protein greatly stimulates the loading of the T4 gene 41 helicase in vitro and is required for recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in vivo. 59 protein binds preferentially to forked DNA and interacts directly with the T4 41 helicase and gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein. The helicase loader is an almost completely alpha-helical, two-domain protein, whose N-terminal domain has strong structural similarity to the DNA-binding domains of high mobility group proteins. We have previously speculated that this high mobility group-like region may bind the duplex ahead of the fork, with the C-terminal domain providing separate binding sites for the fork arms and at least part of the docking area for the helicase and 32 protein. Here, we characterize several mutants of 59 protein in an initial effort to test this model. We find that the I87A mutation, at the position where the fork arms would separate in the model, is defective in binding fork DNA. As a consequence, it is defective in stimulating both unwinding by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. 59 protein with a deletion of the two C-terminal residues, Lys(216) and Tyr(217), binds fork DNA normally. In contrast to the wild type, the deletion protein fails to promote binding of 32 protein on short fork DNA. However, it binds 32 protein in the absence of DNA. The deletion is also somewhat defective in stimulating unwinding of fork DNA by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. We suggest that the absence of the two terminal residues may alter the configuration of the lagging strand fork arm on the surface of the C-terminal domain, so that it is a poorer docking site for the helicase and 32 protein.     

Bacteriophage T4 DNA replication protein 41. Cloning of the gene and purification of the expressed protein

The bacteriophage T4 primase, composed of the T4 proteins 41 and 61, synthesizes pentaribonucleotides used to prime DNA synthesis on single-stranded DNA in vitro. 41 protein is also a DNA helicase that opens DNA in the same direction as the growing replication fork. Previously, Mattson et al. (Mattson, T., Van Houwe, G., Bolle, A., Selzer, G., and Epstein, R. (1977) Mol. Gen. Genet. 154, 319-326) located part of gene 41 on a 3400-base pair EcoRI fragment of T4 DNA (map units 24.3 to 21.15). In this paper, we report the cloning of T4 DNA representing map units 24.3 to 20.06 in a multicopy plasmid vector. Extracts of cells containing this plasmid complement gene 41- extracts in a DNA synthesis assay, indicating that this region contains all the information necessary for the expression of active 41 protein. We located gene 41 more precisely between T4 map units 22.01 to 20.06 since our cloning of this region downstream of the strong lambda promoter PL results in the production of active 41 protein at a level 100-fold greater than after T4 infection. We have purified 133 mg of homogeneous 41 protein from 27 g of these cells. Like the 41 protein from T4 infected cells, the purified 41 protein in conjunction with the T4 gene 61 priming protein catalyzes primer formation (assayed by RNA primer-dependent DNA synthesis with T4 polymerase, the genes 44/62 and 45 polymerase accessory proteins, and the gene 32 helix-destabilizing protein) and is a helicase whose activity is stimulated by T4 61 protein.     

Protein-protein interactions at a DNA replication fork: bacteriophage T4 as a model.

The DNA replication system of bacteriophage T4 serves as a relatively simple model for the types of reactions and protein-protein interactions needed to carry out and coordinate the synthesis of the leading and lagging strands of a DNA replication fork. At least 10 phage-encoded proteins are required for this synthesis: T4 DNA polymerase, the genes 44/62 and 45 polymerase accessory proteins, gene 32 single-stranded DNA binding protein, the genes 61, 41, and 59 primase-helicase, RNase H, and DNA ligase. Assembly of the polymerase and the accessory proteins on the primed template is a stepwise process that requires ATP hydrolysis and is strongly stimulated by 32 protein. The 41 protein helicase is essential to unwind the duplex ahead of polymerase on the leading strand, and to interact with the 61 protein to synthesize the RNA primers that initiate each discontinuous fragment on the lagging strand. An interaction between the 44/62 and 45 polymerase accessory proteins and the primase-helicase is required for primer synthesis on 32 protein-covered DNA. Thus it is possible that the signal for the initiation of a new fragment by the primase-helicase is the release of the polymerase accessory proteins from the completed adjacent fragment.