Genotoxicity testing of six insecticides in two crosses of the Drosophila wing spot test

Among the great variety of genotoxicity assays available, the wing spot test in Drosophila melanogaster has some characteristics that make it very suited for the screening of genotoxic activity, i.e., it is an easy and inexpensive assay using a eukaryotic organism in vivo. One of the most interesting characteristics of the assay is its capacity to detect genotoxic activity of promutagens without the necessity of an exogenous metabolic activation system. In this paper we present results obtained with a recently developed high bioactivation cross of the wing spot test (NORR cross). The positive results obtained with the five well-known procarcinogens 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, N-nitrosopyrrolidine, p-dimethylaminoazobenzene, diethylnitrosamine and urethane clearly show that the NORR strains are similar to the other high bioactivation strains previously described, but they lack their methodological disadvantages. We have tested six insecticides, which are characterised by having contradictory results in other genotoxicity tests, using both the standard and the high bioactivation (NORR) cross. The six insecticides analysed are the pyrethroid allethrin, the methylenedioxyphenolic compound piperonyl butoxide, the chlorinated hydrocarbons dieldrin and endrin, and the organophosphates dimethoate and malathion. We obtained negative results for all six compounds. Our results show the suitability of the wing spot test for the evaluation of compounds at the first level of genotoxicity testing.     

Genotoxicity of triasulfuron in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster is modulated by winter wheat seedlings

Triasulfuron (TS) is a widely used sulfonylurea herbicide which inhibits the acetolactate synthase in broad-leaf weeds and in some wheat crop grasses (Triticum aestivum L.). Residues can be found in soil and superficial water with high toxicity to primary producers. In cereals, TS metabolism depends on cytochromes P450 (CYPs), the age of seedlings and the interaction with compounds. The genotoxicity of TS was demonstrated in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster, an in vivo assay based on the loss of heterozygosity of the mwh and flr markers in the wing imaginal disk cells of larvae fed with chemical agents. Chronic treatments with analytical grade TS, commercial formulation TS (Amber) 75WG) (0.5mg/mL) and commercial formulation bentazon (Basagran) 480) (0.24mg/mL) were performed with three-day-old larvae of the standard (ST) and the high bioactivation (HB) crosses with regulated and high constitutive levels of CYPs, respectively. To demonstrate the effect of winter wheat metabolism on TS genotoxicity, T. aestivum L. seedlings were immersed for 4h in these herbicides, and aqueous extracts (AEs) of the roots were prepared to expose the larvae. TS and Amber 75WG produced similar genotoxic effects in both crosses. Wheat metabolism modulated the genotoxicity because the AEs yielded statistically significant lower spot frequencies in the HB cross than in the ST cross. Differences between the two crosses of the wing spot test in D. melanogaster must be related to CYPs levels. Basagran 480 was genotoxic only in the HB cross, and wheat metabolism did not modulate its genotoxicity.     

Genotoxicity of lapachol evaluated by wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster

This study investigated the genotoxicity of Lapachol (LAP) evaluated by wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster in the descendants from standard (ST) and high bioactivation (HB) crosses. This assay detects the loss of heterozygosity of marker genes expressed phenotypically on the fly's wings. Drosophila has extensive genetic homology to mammals, which makes it a suitable model organism for genotoxic investigations. Three-day-old larvae from ST crosses (females flr(3)/TM3, Bd(s) x males mwh/mwh), with basal levels of the cytochrome P450 and larvae of high metabolic bioactivity capacity (HB cross) (females ORR; flr(3)/TM3, Bd(s) x males mwh/mwh), were used. The results showed that LAP is a promutagen, exhibiting genotoxic activity in larvae from the HB cross. In other words, an increase in the frequency of spots is exclusive of individuals with a high level of the cytochrome P450. The results also indicate that recombinogenicity is the main genotoxic event induced by LAP.     

Structure/activity relationships of the genotoxic potencies of sixteen pyrrolizidine alkaloids assayed for the induction of somatic mutation and recombination in wing cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Sixteen pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) were examined for their genotoxic potency in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster following oral application. This in vivo assay tests for the induction of somatic mutation and mitotic recombination in cells of the developing wing primordia. All PAs tested except the C9-monoester supinine were clearly genotoxic. Depending on their chemical structure, however, genotoxicity of the PAs varied widely in a range encompassing about three orders of magnitude. In general, macrocyclic diester-type PAs were the most and 7-hydroxy C9-monoester types the least genotoxic representatives studied, while open diesters were intermediate in this respect. Stereoisomeric PAs mostly showed similar, but sometimes also clearly unequal genotoxicity. An increasing number of hydroxy groups in the PA molecule seemed to reduce its genotoxic potency. With respect to the structure/activity relationships, there appears to be a good correlation between hepatotoxicity of PAs in experimental rodents and genotoxicity in the wing spot test of Drosophila. This suggests that PAs are bioactivated along similar pathways in the mammalian liver and in the somatic cells of Drosophila. The genotoxic potential of PAs in the Drosophila wing spot test and their carcinogenic potential in mammals also seem correlated, although the information in the literature on carcinogenicity of the non-macrocyclic PAs with moderate to low genotoxic potency is concededly limited. Comparisons with other genotoxicity tests suggest that the wing spot test is particularly suitable for genotoxins like PAs, on the one hand because of the versatile metabolic bioactivation system of Drosophila and on the other hand also because of its excellent sensitivity to the crosslinking agents among the genotoxins.     

Evaluation of the genotoxicity of four herbicides in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster using two different strains

In the present study, the herbicides bentazone, molinate, thiobencarb and trifluralin were evaluated for mutagenic and recombinagenic effects using the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster (somatic mutation and recombination test, SMART). Both standard (ST) and high-bioactivation (HB) fly crosses were used, the latter cross is characterised by a high sensitivity to promutagens and procarcinogens. Three-day-old larvae, transheterozygous for the multiple wing hairs (mwh, 3-0.3) and flare-3 (flr(3), 3-38.8) genes, were chronically fed with six different concentrations of each herbicide. Feeding ended with pupation of the surviving larvae and the genetic changes induced in somatic cells of the wing's imaginal discs lead to the formation of mutant clones on the wing blade. Point mutation, chromosome breakage and mitotic recombination produce single spots; while twin spots are produced only by mitotic recombination. Bentazone, usually considered as a non-mutagen, gave positive results in the wing spot test with the high-bioactivation cross. Molinate, about which information on mutagenic effects is inconclusive, gave positive responses in both the standard and the high-bioactivation crosses, while the other thiocarbamate, thiobencarb, gave positive results only in the standard cross and at the highest concentration tested (10 mM). Finally, trifluralin, one of the most widely studied herbicides for genotoxic effects, gave positive results in the wing spot test with both crosses. Apart from the interest of the results found in the genotoxic evaluation of the four selected herbicides, our results also contribute to extend the existing database on the Drosophila wing spot test, and corroborate the utility of the use of high-bioactivation strains for the genotoxic evaluation of xenobiotics.     

Improved high bioactivation cross for the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.

The two tester strains of the high bioactivation (HB) cross for the wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster developed by Fr?lich and Würgler possess high metabolic capacity to activate promutagens. These strains contain chromosomes 1 and 2 of the DDT-resistant stock Oregon R(R) which exhibits a high constitutive level of cytochrome P450. However, they show several disadvantages for routine application, such as disturbed wing hair patterns in certain areas of the wing, making spot classification difficult, and a delay in development of the larvae. We have established and evaluated an improved HB cross (ORR; flr3 females and mwh males) producing ORR heterozygous individuals. These develop normally and have a normal, undisturbed wing hair pattern while exhibiting high bioactivation. The hybrid larvae of the improved HB cross show P450-dependent bioactivation capacity equal to or even slightly higher than those of the original HB cross. This was demonstrated by measuring the genotoxic activity of the promutagens diethylnitrosamine, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, N-nitrosopyrrolidine, and urethane. In addition, the improved HB cross has a sensitivity to the direct-acting alkylating agent ethyl nitrosourea equal to that of the standard cross. The main advantage of the improved HB cross is to combine the high bioactivation capacity with the ease of scoring the wings using the same criteria as for the standard cross.     

Genotoxic effects of eugenol, isoeugenol and safrole in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster

In the present study, the phenolic compounds eugenol, isoeugenol and safrole were investigated for genotoxicity in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. The Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) provides a rapid means to evaluate agents able to induce gene mutations and chromosome aberrations, as well as rearrangements related to mitotic recombination. We applied the SMART in its standard version with normal bioactivation and in its variant with increased cytochrome P450-dependent biotransformation capacity. Eugenol and safrole produced a positive recombinagenic response only in the improved assay, which was related to a high CYP450-dependent activation capacity. This suggests, as previously reported, the involvement of this family of enzymes in the activation of eugenol and safrole rather than in its detoxification. On the contrary, isoeugenol was clearly non-genotoxic at the same millimolar concentrations as used for eugenol in both the crosses. The responsiveness of SMART assays to recombinagenic compounds, as well as the reactive metabolites from eugenol and safrole were considered responsible for the genotoxicity observed.     

Thirty compounds tested in the Drosophila wing spot test

The Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was evaluated for its suitability in genotoxicity screening by testing 30 chemicals. Of the 2 crosses used, the mwh-flr3 cross turned out to be more convenient than the previously used mwh-flr cross. Based on the experience gained with both acute exposures and chronic exposures of different duration, we suggest that the optimal strategy in genotoxicity screening is to start with chronic exposure of 3-day-old larvae for 48 h (that is, until pupation). Only for unstable compounds and very volatile compounds and gases are acute treatments, including inhalation, recommended. In general, a qualitative evaluation of the genotoxicity of a compound in the wing assay is possible with as few as 1-2 different exposure concentrations. A more quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity, based upon dose-response data, can often be achieved with as few as 3-4 concentrations. The results reported here were obtained in 2 different laboratories, demonstrating that the wing spot test is easily transferable to other laboratories. The experience gained indicates that the assay has now been developed to an extent that a coordinated international comparative validation study is desirable.     

Ethylene thiourea (ETU). A review of the genetic toxicity studies

Ethylene thiourea (ETU) is a common contaminant, metabolite and degradation product of the fungicide class of ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDCs); as such, they present possible exposure and toxicological concerns to exposed individuals. ETU has been assayed in many different tests to assess genotoxicity activity. While a great number of negative results are found in the data base, there is evidence that demonstrates ETU is capable of inducing genotoxic endpoints. These include responses for gene mutations (e.g. Salmonella), structural chromosomal alterations (e.g. aberrations in cultured mammalian cells as well as a dominant lethal assay) and other genotoxic effects (e.g. bacterial rec assay and several yeast assays).It is important to consider the magnitude of the positive responses as well as the concentrations/doses used when assessing the genotoxicity of ETU. While ETU induces a variety of genotoxic endpoints, it does not appear to be a potent genotoxic agent. For example, it is a weak bacterial mutagen in the Salmonella assay without activation in strain TA1535 at concentrations generally above 1000 μg/plate. Weak genotoxic activity of this sort is usually observed in most of the assays with positive results. Since ETU does not appear very potent and is not extremely toxic to test cells and organisms, it is not surprising to find that ETU does not produce consistent effects in many of the assays reviewed. Consequently, in many instances, mixed results for the same assay type are reported by different investigators, but as reviewed herein, these results may be dependent upon the test conditions in each individual laboratory. A primary shortcoming with many of the reported negative results is that the concentrations or doses used are not high enough for an adequate test for ETU activity. There are also problems with many of the negative assays generally in protocol or reporting, particularly with the in vivo studies (e.g. inappropriate sample number and/or sampling times; inadequate top dose employed).Overall, while ETU does not appear to be a potent genotoxic agent, it is capable of producing genotoxic effects (e.g. gene mutations, structural chromosomal aberrations). This provides a basis for weak genotoxic activity by ETU. Furthermore, based on a suggestive dominant lethal positive result, there may be a concern for heritable effects. Due to the many problems with the conduct and assessment of the in vivo assays, it is worth repeating in vivo     

Genotoxicity of zineb detected through the somatic and germ-line mosaic assays and the sex-linked recessive-lethal test in Drosophila melanogaster

The genotoxicity of zineb, a carbamate fungicide, has been tested through eye, wing and female germ line mosaic assays and the sex-linked recessive-lethal test in Drosophila melanogaster. Larvae of different instars, heterozygous for appropriate recessive genetic markers, were exposed to the fungicide in food for different durations of time. The adult eyes and wings were screened for induction of mosaic spots and the eggs laid by the females were checked for induction of female germ-line mosaicism. It is concluded that zineb is genotoxic to both somatic and germ-line cells of Drosophila.     

Genotoxicity evaluation of five tricyclic antidepressants in the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster

Five tricyclic antidepressants were tested for genotoxicity using the somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in wing cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Three-day-old larvae trans-heterozygous for 2 linked recessive wing hair mutants (multiple wing hairs and flare) were fed the test compounds in water mixed with a standard dry food for 48 h. Wings of the emerging adult flies were scored for the presence of spots of mutant cells which can be the consequence of either somatic mutation or mitotic recombination. Desipramine and imipramine were clearly genotoxic at concentrations above 1 mM whereas amitriptyline, nortriptyline and protriptyline were not genotoxic at concentrations up to 100 mM. This seems to implicate the nitrogen atom at position 5 in the 7-membered ring of the tricyclic molecule as being responsible for the genotoxic property of the compounds in Drosophila.     

Modulatory effects of Duguetia furfuracea (A. St. Hil) Benth. and Hook. f. in Drosophila melanogaster somatic and germinative cells

Mutagenic and antimutagenic activities of the medicinal plant Duguetia furfuracea were assessed using SMART/wing and ring-X-loss tests. For the ring-X-loss test, 2- to 3-day-old Drosophila melanogaster ring-X-lineage males and virgin ywsn3 females received D. furfuracea infusion at doses of 0.085, 0.042, or 0.014 g/mL for 24 h. We found that D. furfuracea did not produce any mutagenic effects in D. melanogaster germinative cells. The somatic cells of D. melanogaster were analyzed using the SMART/wing test involving three lineages - mwh, flr3, and ORR - and the same doses of D. furfuracea infusion employed in the ring-X-loss test, as well as 20 mM urethane. The results of both standard (ST) and high bioactivation (HB) crosses showed absence of mutagenic activity of D. furfuracea. In contrast, in both ST and HB crosses, we observed a modulatory effect of D. furfuracea against the genotoxic activity of urethane.     

Genotoxic activation of hydrazine, two dialkylhydrazines, thiourea and ethylene thiourea in the somatic w/w+ assay of Drosophila melanogaster

Genotoxic activation of hydrazine (HZ), two symmetrical dialkylhydrazines, namely, 1,2dimethylhydrazine and 1,2-diethylhydrazine (SDMH and SDEH), thiourea (TU) and ethylene thiourea (ETU) has been evaluated by means of the w/w+ somatic assay of Drosophila. Both low bioactivation insecticide-susceptible (IS) and high biotransformation insecticide-resistant (IR) strains were used. The combined application of insecticide-susceptible and insecticide-resistant strains should, in principle, detect somatic cell recombinagens in the Drosophila melanogaster in vivo w/w+ assay. The IS strain was more susceptible to toxicity induced by the test chemicals than the IR stocks. Its performance in the biotransformation of the chemicals tested was rather poor. TU was inactive in all strains. With the active compounds, spot frequencies increased approximately linearly with dose for each spot type. SDEH gave a strong positive result in all three female genotypes exposed. HZ, ETU and SDMH were overall weakly positive in the IR strain Haag-79 (HG-R). Interestingly, ETU was clearly positive in the IR Hikone-R (HK-R) strain. A comparison of the recombinagenic potencies between the active and the weakly positive compounds, and among strains, showed pronounced genotype-dependent differences between the low and the high bioactivation strains. The ability of Drosophila to express several procarcinogens in relation to insecticide-resistance after activation catalyzed by CYP450 enzymes is discussed.     

Genetic toxicity of six carcinogens and six non-carcinogens in the Drosophila wing spot test

Six rodent carcinogens, 5 of which are also human carcinogens, and 6 compounds recognized as non-carcinogens were tested for their genotoxic activity in the Drosophila melanogaster wing spot test. 72-h-old larvae trans-heterozygous for the recessive wing cell markers 'multiple wing hairs' (mwh) and 'flare' (flr3) were fed various concentrations of the test compounds for a period of 48 h. With amitrole and 4-aminobiphenyl, larvae of the same age were also given an acute treatment of 6 h with higher concentrations, and, in addition, 48-h-old larvae were fed for a longer period of 72 h. Repeats of all experiments document the good reproducibility of the results in the wing spot test. Amitrole and 4-aminobiphenyl were genotoxic after both 48-h and 72-h treatments, but their activity could not be detected following acute exposure of only 6 h. Chlorambucil and melphalan were clearly genotoxic. The carcinogens sodium arsenite and sodium arsenate, however, which are highly toxic to Drosophila, could only be tested at low exposure levels and were negative under these treatment conditions. The 6 non-carcinogens (ascorbic acid, 2-aminobiphenyl, mannitol, piperonyl butoxide, stannous chloride and titanium dioxide) were all definitely non-genotoxic in the Drosophila wing spot test. The data for the non-carcinogens demonstrate that non-genotoxic compounds can be identified in the wing spot test with a reasonable experimental effort.     

Doxorubicin and two of its analogues are preferential inducers of homologous recombination compared with mutational events in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster

The genotoxic effects of the anthracycline doxorubicin (DOX) and two of its analogues, epirubicin (EPI) and pirarubicin (THP) were studied using the wing Somatic Mutation and Recombination Test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster. These compounds are classified as topoisomerase II (topo II) poisons, acting by stabilizing a topoisomerase II-cleaved DNA complex. Using the standard version of the SMART test it was possible to estimate the quantitative and qualitative genotoxic effects of these compounds, comparing the wing spot frequencies in marker- and balancer-heterozygous flies. The results obtained indicate that all three compounds induce a high frequency of spots related to homologous recombination (HR), which is the major event responsible for their genetic toxicity. Pirarubicin was the most genotoxic anthracycline, inducing approximately 21 times more genetic lesions than doxorubicin, probably due to the presence of a second sugar ring in the amino sugar moiety in its chemical structure. Although the only difference between epirubicin and doxorubicin is the steric position of the amino sugar 4'-OH in the molecule, epirubicin is approximately 1.6 times as genotoxic as doxorubicin.     

Genotoxic activity in vivo of the naturally occurring glucoside,cycasin, in the Drosophila wing spot test

Cycasin, methylazoxymethanol-β-glucoside, is a naturally occurring carcinogenic compound. The genotoxicity of cycasin was assayed in the Drosophila wing spot test. Cycasin induced small single and large single spots on feeding at 10 μmol/g medium. The presence of these spots indicates that cycasin is genotoxic in Drosophila melanogaster. Microorganisms which showed β-glucosidase activity for cleaving cycasin to toxic aglycon were isolated from gut flora of the Drosophila larvae. Consequently, the Drosophila wing spot test would be useful for mutagenicity screening of other naturally occurring glucosides.     

The genetic toxicology of ethylenethiourea: a case study concerning the evaluation of a chemical's genotoxic potential

Ethylenethiourea (ETU) is a metabolite, environmental degradation product and minor technical impurity of the ethylenebisdithiocarbamate (EBDC) class of fungicides. The genetic toxicology of ETU is important given that ETU causes thyroid tumors in rodents and liver tumors in mice. Although it is clear that ETU induces thyroid tumors via a non-genotoxic, threshold mechanism, the role ETU plays in inducing mouse liver tumors remains to be fully elucidated. Recently, Dearfield (Mutation Res., 317, 111–132, 1994) reviewed the genetic toxicology of ETU, and concluded that, although ETU is not a potent genotoxic agent, it is weakly genotoxic. This view stands in contrast to reports from several independent authorities that have generally concurred that ETU is not a mammalian genotoxin (IARC, 1987; MAFF, 1990; NTP, 1992; FAO/WHO, 1994). These conflicting reports highlight a generic problem in genotoxicity safety assessment: although individual test results typically yield either a positive or negative response, the overall evaluation of an extensive battery of tests for a particular chemical rarely yields an unambiguous conclusion. Recently, Mendelsohn et al. (Mutation Res., 266, 43–60, 1992) showed that the response of a chemical to a battery of genotoxicity tests is not a dichotomous (i.e., either positive or negative) property, but rather, appears to be a continuous property that ranges from strongly negative to strongly positive. We have used these data, together with a four-step weight of the evidence procedure, to evaluate ETU. Our analysis indicates that ETU is not genotoxic in mammalian systems and suggests that ETU likely induces mouse liver tumors by a non-genotoxic mechanism.     

Evaluation of genotoxicity of the indenoisoquinoline analogues of fagaronine and nitidine in Drosophila melanogaster

The wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster was done to evaluate the genotoxicity of the antitumor indenoisoquinoline analogues of nitidine chloride and fagaronien chloride in larvae. Both compounds have toxic effects but no statistically significant increase in the frequency of spots was detected with the analogue of nitidine chloride. This strongly suggests that this compounds is not mutagenic to Drosophila larvae at the concentrations tested. Results with the analogue of fagaronine chloride were ambiguous. Low mutagenicity was detected in only one of two experiments and in the pooled results at 2 mM but not at 5 mM or 10 mM. These results suggest at best a very weak genotoxic effect but its biological significance needs confirmation by results from other assays.     

Genotoxicity is modulated by ascorbic acid: Studies using the wing spot test in Drosophila

The ability of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) to modulate the genotoxic action of several mutagens was investigated in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. In this assay, 3-day-old transheterozygous larvae for the multiple wing hairs (mwh, 3-0.3) and flare (flr, 3-38.8) genes were treated with three reference mutagenic compounds, namely cobalt chloride (CoCl₂), 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) and potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇). The results obtained show that the three reference mutagens tested were clearly genotoxic in the Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART). None of the three concentrations tested of ascorbic acid (25, 75 and 250 mM) induced significant increases in the frequency of the mutant clones recorded. When co-treatment experiments with ascorbic acid were carried out, different results were found. Thus, ascorbic acid was effective in reducing the genotoxicity of K₂Cr₂O₇ virtually to the control level; on the contrary, it did not show any antigenotoxic effect on the genotoxicity of 4-NQO. Finally, co-treatments with CoCl₂ and ascorbic acid show a significant increase in the frequency of mutant clones over the values obtained with CoCl₂ alone.     

Modulatory effects of Tabebuia impetiginosa (Lamiales, Bignoniaceae) on doxorubicin-induced somatic mutation and recombination in Drosophila melanogaster

The wing Somatic Mutation and Recombination Test (SMART) in D. melanogaster was used to study genotoxicity of the medicinal plant Tabebuia impetiginosa. Lapachol (naphthoquinone) and β-lapachone (quinone) are the two main chemical constituents of T. impetiginosa. These compounds have several biological properties. They induce apoptosis by generating oxygen-reactive species, thereby inhibiting topoisomerases (I and II) or inducing other enzymes dependent on NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, thus affecting cell cycle checkpoints. The SMART was used in the standard (ST) version, which has normal levels of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, to check the direct action of this compound, and in the high bioactivation (HB) version, which has a high constitutive level of CYP enzymes, to check for indirect action in three different T. impetiginosa concentrations (10%, 20% or 40% w/w). It was observed that T. impetiginosa alone did not modify the spontaneous frequencies of mutant spots in either cross. The negative results observed prompted us to study this phytotherapeuticum in association with the reference mutagen doxorubicin (DXR). In co-treated series, T. impetiginosa was toxic in both crosses at higher concentration, whereas in the HB cross, it induced a considerable potentiating effect (from ~24.0 to ~95.0%) on DXR genotoxity. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the possible risks associated with the exposure of living organisms to this complex mixture.