AIDS awareness among rural Utah physicians.

Studies of physicians'' attitudes and knowledge of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and the clinical precautions they take against exposure to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have focused on urban physicians. To determine rural physicians'' knowledge and attitudes about AIDS, a questionnaire was mailed to 321 physicians practicing in rural Utah. Of the 169 physicians who completed questionnaires, 96% thought that their community or area of service had only a minor or no problem with AIDS; 89%, however, thought that their chance of seeing a patient who was HIV-positive was fair to moderate. Of the 169 respondents, 3% were not sure whether they would even treat a patient who had AIDS, 67% said they would, and 30% said they would not. Although all physicians are at risk of seeing a patient who has had exposure to HIV and other blood-borne diseases such as hepatitis B, only 55% of the respondents felt a need to take clinical precautions to prevent their exposure to the virus. Our study shows the need for all rural Utah physicians to reevaluate their risk of exposure to HIV, to increase precautionary measures for their own protection, to consider the ethical responsibility of treating AIDS patients, and to take a more active role in teaching their patients how to protect themselves from exposure to the virus.     

A Pilot Study of Medicare Patients' Experiences and Attitudes

There has been widespread interest in the effect the Medicare law has had on the level of physicians'' charges. This subject and other aspects of the present Medicare method of physician reimbursement is currently under study by Congress and the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. A group of Medicare patients recently seen and treated by the author were queried as to their experiences in paying for physicians'' services under Medicare. A 64 percent response rate and the substance of the replies to a questionnaire suggests that this is a feasible mechanism for eliciting the attitudes and problems in a group of patients in the Medicare program.     

Do physicians have an ethical obligation to care for patients with AIDS?

This paper responds to the question: Do physicians have an ethical obligation to care for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)? First, the social and political milieu in which this question arises is sampled. Here physicians as well as other members of the community are found declaring an unwillingness to be exposed to people with AIDS. Next, laws, regulations, ethical codes and principles, and the history of the practice of medicine are examined, and the literature as it pertains to these areas is reviewed. The obligation to care for patients with AIDS, however, cannot be located in an orientation to morality defined in rules and codes and an appeal to legalistic fairness. By turning to the orientation to morality that emerges naturally from connection and is defined in caring, the physicians'' ethical obligation to care for patients with AIDS is found. Through an exploration of the writings of modern medical ethicists, it is clear that the purpose of the practice of medicine is healing, which can only be accomplished in relationship to the patient. It is in relationship to patients that the physician has the opportunity for self-realization. In fact, the physician is physician in relationship to patients and only to the extent that he or she acts virtuously by being morally responsible for and to those patients. Not to do so diminishes the physician''s ethical ideal, a vision of the physician as good physician, which has consequences for the physician''s capacity to care and for the practice of medicine.     

Physician time-saving by employment of expanded-role nurses in family practice

Registered nurses working in five family practices in Kingston, Ontario, were given a period of in-service training and supplementary formal instruction at Queen''s University to expand their skills and enable them to undertake prescribed procedures in the physicians'' offices. Operational data collected from the five practices before and after training was analysed to assess the saving of physician time effected by the expansion of the nurses'' activities in providing primary medical care. Physician time was saved in all cases but the amount varied. The results are presented and discussed in relation to staff, physical premises and patterns of practice of the participating physicians. Under the most advantageous practice circumstances in this study, a 33.7% saving in original physician time was obtained. The mean time-saving for the five practices was 18.2%.     

Barriers to prenatal care for low-income women.

Inadequate prenatal care is associated with poor birth outcomes. Recognizing barriers to care is necessary to improve results. Postpartum in-hospital interviews were conducted with women admitted through emergency departments with no physician of record (n = 69) in 8 Sacramento hospitals during April and May 1991. A focus group of local obstetrician-gynecologists was used to determine physicians'' attitudes about caring for low-income women. We undertook the study in response to an increased number of "no doc" births. The inability to find a physician willing to accept them was reported by the women as the single largest barrier to obtaining care, cited by 64% of women overall and 96% of those who tried but were unable to obtain care. Transportation difficulties were a problem regardless of women''s success in obtaining care and were ranked as the top barrier by women who never tried to obtain care. Physicians cited administrative difficulties and reimbursement levels of Medi-Cal plus extra care requirements and resource dependency of low-income patients as barriers to caring for this population. The value ascribed to prenatal care by women and physicians'' perceptions of women''s attitudes about care contrasted sharply. The link between poor women and physicians providing obstetric services can be fragile. The difficulty finding physicians willing to take them indicates that these women need special support services to ensure adequate care during pregnancy.     

Physicians' perception of personal risk of HIV infection and AIDS through occupational exposure.

Physicians'' response to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is poorly understood and often attributed to fear of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through occupational exposure. We surveyed 268 physicians from three geographic regions in North American with different specialties and responsibilities for HIV-positive patients. An important difference was found between the published risk and the physicians'' perceived risk of infection after a single occupational exposure. Almost half of the respondents stated that they feared contracting AIDS more than other diseases. The physicians who perceived themselves to be at high physical risk were more likely than the others to report that AIDS had changed the way they interact with their patients (r = 0.26, p less than 0.001). No relation was found between the perception of physical risk and the number of HIV-infected patients (r = -0.07, p = 0.15). However, the perception of social risk showed a small inverse correlation (r = -0.15, p less than 0.02), in which the physicians with more HIV-infected patients reported less concern about negative social consequences. The physicians who perceived themselves to be at high personal risk were more likely than the others to report that surgeons have the right to refuse patients who do not wish to undergo HIV antibody testing (r = -0.16, p less than 0.01 for physical risk; r = -0.29, p less than 0.001 for social risk). Multiple regression analyses indicated that physicians'' perception of physical risk was not related to age or sex but was modestly related to income source. The perception of social risk was related to sex and income source. Physicians'' perception of personal risk is a crucial, yet often unacknowledged, component of the fight against AIDS. Our findings suggest that lack of attention to this issue is seriously compromising initiatives designed to facilitate physician participation in AIDS care.     

Physician Care Patterns and Adherence to Postpartum Glucose Testing after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Oregon

Objective

This study examines obstetrician/gynecologists and family medicine physicians'' reported care patterns, attitudes and beliefs and predictors of adherence to postpartum testing in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Research Design and Methods

In November–December 2005, a mailed survey went to a random, cross-sectional sample of 683 Oregon licensed physicians in obstetrician/gynecologists and family medicine from a population of 2171.

Results

Routine postpartum glucose tolerance testing by both family physicians (19.3%) and obstetrician/gynecologists physicians (35.3%) was reportedly low among the 285 respondents (42% response rate). Factors associated with high adherence to postpartum testing included physician stated priority (OR 4.39, 95% CI: 1.69–7.94) and physician beliefs about norms or typical testing practices (OR 3.66, 95% CI: 1.65–11.69). Specialty, sex of physician, years of practice, location, type of practice, other attitudes and beliefs were not associated with postpartum glucose tolerance testing.

Conclusions

Postpartum glucose tolerance testing following a gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancy was not routinely practiced by responders to this survey. Our findings indicate that physician knowledge, attitudes and beliefs may in part explain suboptimal postpartum testing. Although guidelines for postpartum care are established, some physicians do not prioritize these guidelines in practice and do not believe postpartum testing is the norm among their peers.     

Use of botulinum toxin

In an extensive survey of postgraduate physicians in two teaching hospitals (N = 141) for their humanistic attitudes, values and behavior, all ratings of physicians'' humanistic performance, including physicians'' own scores on self-report measures, supervising faculty, nurses and patient ratings, were modestly but significantly correlated with each other. Sex, ethnic or racial background, year of training, marital status, number of children, Alpha-Omega-Alpha membership or number of articles published were unrelated to physicians'' humanistic behavior. Several measures of humanism were positively correlated with having taken more courses in the social sciences and humanities, having had more early person-centered work experience and reporting that before medical school others had confided in them or sought their advice more frequently.     

US report on violence in the medical workplace may hold lessons for Canadian MDs.

Concern about the growing incidence of violence against health care professionals has prompted the Young Physicians Section of the American Medical Association to research and develop a publication designed to raise physicians'' awareness. Violence in the Medical Workplace. Prevention Strategies provides some commonsense precautions that could minimize the possibility a physician will fall victim to violence at the hands of a patient.     

General practitioners' attitudes towards AIDS and their perceived information needs.

A short questionnaire on general practitioners'' self perceived and actual knowledge of AIDS and their attitudes to the illness was sent to 1824 general practitioners throughout the United Kingdom. The rate of response was 70%. Women doctors, those who trained overseas, and those who were married tended to have less positive attitudes towards patients with HIV and AIDS, whereas younger doctors, trainers, and members of the Royal College of General Practitioners were more understanding, better informed, and had more positive attitudes. Doctors with the least knowledge about HIV and AIDS and the most negative attitudes towards the illness would benefit from further education, which would be most effectively delivered through the professional journals, the Department of Health and the charitable AIDS organisations.     

Physicians' Own Health—Some Advice for the Advisors

Information about physicians'' health and health practices is sparse and scattered. With a few exceptions, however—notably suicide and substance abuse—it appears that physicians'' health and health-promotion activities are at least similar to those of the general public. In some areas, such as smoking cessation, physicians have far outstripped the general public. As physicians gain more insight into their own health and health habits, advice to patients can be realistic and effective. Indeed, several personal health activities, including immunization, have direct, salutary impacts on patient care. Physicians should analyze and change their own health practices as indicated and pay special attention to “high yield” health habits, such as seat-belt use.     

Taking care of patients--does it matter whether the physician is a woman?

Researchers have recently begun to compare male and female physicians'' attitudes toward patients, medical knowledge, and practice styles. Although women start medical school with more "humanistic views," the conservative effect of medical socialization on both male and female students attenuates these differences. While some studies suggested that men are more scientifically knowledgeable, recent studies showed no significant differences in physicians'' medical knowledge. Male and female physicians also had comparable diagnostic and therapeutic behavior. In the intimate world of physicians and patients, however, there were notable differences. Women physicians seemed better able to communicate sensitivity and caring to patients, which may account for the common perception that women are more caring and empathic physicians. Medical educators may wish to study more closely female physicians'' communication styles to identify these behaviors and inculcate them into all physicians.     

Hormone replacement therapy: a survey of Ontario physicians' prescribing practices

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about hormone replacement therapy (HRT), there are few clearcut recommendations on its use. The purpose of this study was to determine Ontario physicians'' patterns of and reasons for prescribing HRT, their use of pretreatment investigations and their surveillance of HRT users, and to determine whether physicians'' reported practice is consistent with existing recommendations. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a nonproportional stratified sample of 327 Ontario physicians (23.9% gynecologists, 76.1% general practitioners/family physicians [GP/FPs]). Outcome measures were ranking of reasons for prescribing HRT, nature of preliminary testing, regimens prescribed, duration of HRT and frequency of follow-up. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.9% overall (70.9% of the gynecologists, 58.3% of the GP/FPs). Prevention of osteoporosis was reported by 97.4% as an important or very important reason for prescribing HRT; prevention of coronary artery disease was important or very important for 89.3%. When considering whether or not to prescribe HRT, 97.3% stated that breast cancer was an important or very important factor. When presented with hypothetical cases, 97.0% stated that they would prescribe combined estrogen-progestin for a symptomatic woman with an intact uterus; 13.6% stated that they would do so for a woman with no uterus. Most reported that they would prescribe HRT for 12 or more years (73.3%) and would follow up patients every 1 to 2 years (70.6%). INTERPRETATION: Despite controversy about HRT in the published literature, the Ontario physicians surveyed reported similar reasons and patterns of prescribing, pretreatment investigations, and surveillance of postmenopausal women using HRT. These results suggest that Ontario physicians'' knowledge about HRT is consistent with recommendations in the published literature.     

A CMA position. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

The following general principles serve as guidelines for various bodies, health care professionals and the general public. Specific aspects of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) that relate to physicians'' ethical responsibilities as well as society''s moral obligations are discussed. Such matters include the need for education, research and treatment resources; the patient''s right to investigation and treatment and to refusal of either; the need to obtain the patient''s informed consent; the right to privacy and confidentiality; the importance of infection control; and the right to financial compensation in the case of occupational exposure to HIV.     

Therapeutic priorities of Canadian internists.

We surveyed 175 members of the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine to determine how they would rank seven commonly used treatments as to their clinical usefulness. A total of 70% of the respondents judged that the treatment of severe hypertension was the most beneficial. Coronary artery bypass surgery and treatment with acetylsalicylic acid for transient ischemic attacks were ranked next most useful. Cholestyramine therapy for hypercholesterolemia, the treatment of mild hypertension, isoniazid therapy for inactive tuberculosis and carotid endarterectomy in patients with mild stroke formed the final cluster. Except for treatment of severe hypertension there was a wide variation in the physicians'' enthusiasm for the various treatments. Possible explanations for this variation include physicians'' lack of awareness of the results of clinical trials, the wide range of risk reductions found in various trials of the same therapy, an unwillingness by physicians to generalize from clinical trials to individual patients, individual physicians'' placement of different values on the morbidity associated with various diseases, and the fact that physicians may rarely explicitly compare the usefulness of therapies. In general, the number of patients needed to be treated to save one life better reflected the physicians'' judgements than did the relative risk reduction.     

Survey of general practitioners' attitudes to AIDS in the North West Thames and East Anglian regions

As the numbers of people suffering from human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) increase, so will the contribution to care required from general practice. A postal questionnaire survey was therefore carried out among general practitioners in the North West Thames and East Anglian regions to determine their attitudes to AIDS and the issues it raises for them. One hundred and thirty seven questionnaires were returned (response rate 57%) and four factors underlying the doctors'' attitudes identified; these concerned disease control, general practitioner care, patient support, and perception of seriousness. There were wide divergencies of attitude among the general practitioners, younger doctors being more in line with specialist thinking on AIDS than older colleagues, and evidence of important gaps between policies advocated by AIDS specialists and bodies of opinion in general practice.Attitudes to AIDS in general practice may partly be a function of personal experience; further study is required.     

AIDS in children

The application of medical quality assurance principles to ambulatory patient care using the traditional methods of medical chart audit, process review, and physician education has yielded generally disappointing results in improving patient care and physician performance. Newer methods assist physicians by providing patient and medical reference data at the time of a patient''s visit. Techniques for tracking treatment outcomes and patients'' test results and for providing instructions to patients may improve both care and patients'' and physicians'' satisfaction.This feature appears regularly in THE WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. It is intended to cover recent developments in a broad range of issues that will have an impact—either directly or indirectly—on clinical practice. Occasionally the seminars may include informed speculation about likely future developments.     

Concerns of patients,MDs are transforming transfusion medicine.

Fear of HIV and AIDS has been the driving force in reducing physicians'' use of blood and blood products. Nancy Robb interviewed doctors across the country to determine steps they are taking to lower the number of transfusions and discovered that transfusion medicine in Canada has undergone a sea change.