A role for 14-3-3 tau in E2F1 stabilization and DNA damage-induced apoptosis

Genotoxic stress triggers apoptosis through multiple signaling pathways. Recent studies have demonstrated a specific induction of E2F1 accumulation and a role for E2F1 in apoptosis upon DNA damage. Induction of E2F1 is mediated by phosphorylation events that are dependent on DNA damage-responsive protein kinases, such as ATM. How ATM phosphorylation leads to E2F1 stabilization is unknown. We now show that 14-3-3 tau, a phosphoserine-binding protein, mediates E2F1 stabilization. 14-3-3 tau interacts with ATM-phosphorylated E2F1 during DNA damage and inhibits E2F1 ubiquitination. Depletion of 14-3-3 tau or E2F1, but not E2F2 or E2F3, blocks adriamycin-induced apoptosis. 14-3-3 tau is also required for expression and induction of E2F1 apoptotic targets, such as p73, Apaf-1, and caspases, during DNA damage. Together, these data demonstrate a novel function for 14-3-3 tau in the regulation of E2F1 protein stability and apoptosis during DNA damage.     

E1A oncogene-induced cellular sensitization to immune-mediated apoptosis is independent of p53 and resistant to blockade by E1B 19 kDa protein.

E1A oncogene expression sensitizes mammalian cells to apoptosis triggered by cytolytic lymphocytes (CL) [16]. Most studies suggest that E1A-induced apoptosis involves a p53-dependent cellular pathway that is blocked by the E1B 19 kDa gene product. In this study, the roles of p53 and E1B 19 kDa were tested for E1A sensitization to CL-induced apoptosis in contrast with apoptosis triggered by TNF alpha or chemical injuries. E1A sensitization to immune-mediated (CL- or TNF-induced) apoptosis was independent of p53 expression and was resistant to blockade by E1B 19 kDa protein in mouse and hamster cells. In contrast, the p53 requirement for chemically induced apoptosis of E1A-sensitized cells varied with the agent used to treat cells. Apoptosis induced by diverse chemical agents (hygromycin, beauvericin, etoposide, H(2)O(2)) was blocked by E1B 19 kDa expression. Therefore, both the p53-dependence and the E1B 19 kDa blockade of E1A-induced cellular sensitization to apoptotic injury depend on the type of proapoptotic injury tested. These data suggest that the mechanisms by which E1A sensitizes tumor cells to immune-mediated apoptosis and to rejection by immunocompetent animals do not require cellular expression of wild-type p53 and can function independently of the Bcl-2-like, antiapoptotic mechanisms of E1B 19 kDa.     

E2F and p53 induce apoptosis independently during Drosophila development but intersect in the context of DNA damage

In mammalian cells, RB/E2F and p53 are intimately connected, and crosstalk between these pathways is critical for the induction of cell cycle arrest or cell death in response to cellular stresses. Here we have investigated the genetic interactions between RBF/E2F and p53 pathways during Drosophila development. Unexpectedly, we find that the pro-apoptotic activities of E2F and p53 are independent of one another when examined in the context of Drosophila development: apoptosis induced by the deregulation of dE2F1, or by the overexpression of dE2F1, is unaffected by the elimination of dp53; conversely, dp53-induced phenotypes are unaffected by the elimination of dE2F activity. However, dE2F and dp53 converge in the context of a DNA damage response. Both dE2F1/dDP and dp53 are required for DNA damage-induced cell death, and the analysis of rbf1 mutant eye discs indicates that dE2F1/dDP and dp53 cooperatively promote cell death in irradiated discs. In this context, the further deregulation in the expression of pro-apoptotic genes generates an additional sensitivity to apoptosis that requires both dE2F/dDP and dp53 activity. This sensitivity differs from DNA damage-induced apoptosis in wild-type discs (and from dE2F/dDP-induced apoptosis in un-irradiated rbf1 mutant eye discs) by being dependent on both hid and reaper. These results show that pro-apoptotic activities of dE2F1 and dp53 are surprisingly separable: dp53 is required for dE2F-dependent apoptosis in the response to DNA damage, but it is not required for dE2F-dependent apoptosis caused simply by the inactivation of rbf1.     

E2F1 mediates DNA damage and apoptosis through HCF‐1 and the MLL family of histone methyltransferases

E2F1 is a key positive regulator of human cell proliferation and its activity is altered in essentially all human cancers. Deregulation of E2F1 leads to oncogenic DNA damage and anti‐oncogenic apoptosis. The molecular mechanisms by which E2F1 mediates these two processes are poorly understood but are important for understanding cancer progression. During the G1‐to‐S phase transition, E2F1 associates through a short DHQY sequence with the cell‐cycle regulator HCF‐1 together with the mixed‐lineage leukaemia (MLL) family of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferases. We show here that the DHQY HCF‐1‐binding sequence permits E2F1 to stimulate both DNA damage and apoptosis, and that HCF‐1 and the MLL family of H3K4 methyltransferases have important functions in these processes. Thus, HCF‐1 has a broader role in E2F1 function than appreciated earlier. Indeed, sequence changes in the E2F1 HCF‐1‐binding site can modulate both up and down the ability of E2F1 to induce apoptosis indicating that HCF‐1 association with E2F1 is a regulator of E2F1‐induced apoptosis.     

BRG1/BRM and prohibitin are required for growth suppression by estrogen antagonists

Estrogen antagonists are universally employed in the breast cancer therapy, although antagonist therapy is limited by the inevitable development of cellular resistance. The molecular mechanisms by which these agents inhibit cellular proliferation in breast cancer cells are not fully defined. Recent studies have shown the involvement of the E2F pathway in tamoxifen-induced growth arrest. We show that an E2F repressor, prohibitin, and the chromatin modifiers Brg1/Brm are required for estrogen antagonist-mediated growth suppression through the estrogen receptor, and that their recruitment to native promoter-bound E2F is induced via a JNK1 pathway. In addition, we demonstrate major mechanistic differences among the signaling pathways initiated by estrogen, estrogen deprivation, and estrogen antagonists. Collectively, these findings suggest that the prohibitin/Brg1/Brm node is a major cellular target for estrogen antagonists, and thereby also implicate prohibitin/Brg1/Brm as potentially important targets for breast cancer therapy.