Method for rapid DNA extraction from bacterial communities of different soils

A method for indirect DNA extraction from various soils significantly differing in their physicochemical properties has been developed. The proposed method is based on cell desorption from soil particles using a Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer supplemented with polyvinylpolypyrrolydone (PVPP) and sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS). Methods for subsequent cell lysis and purification of DNA preparations based on alkaline lysis followed by chromatography on ion-exchange resins were described by us earlier. The purity of the DNA preparations obtained did not depend on the type of soil. It was shown that the DNA preparations can be used for the amplification of rather large fragments, e.g., sequences spanning the complete 16S rRNA gene.     

Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments.

Experiments were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different methodological approaches for recovering DNA from soil and sediment bacterial communities: cell extraction followed by lysis and DNA recovery (cell extraction method) versus direct cell lysis and alkaline extraction to recover DNA (direct lysis method). Efficiency of DNA recovery by each method was determined by spectrophotometric absorbance and using a tritiated thymidine tracer. With both procedures, the use of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone was important for the removal of humic compounds to improve the purity of the recovered DNA; without extensive purification, various restriction enzymes failed to cut added target DNA. Milligram quantities of high-purity DNA were recovered from 100-g samples of both soils and sediments by the direct lysis method, which was a greater than 1-order-of-magnitude-higher yield than by the cell extraction method. The ratio of labeled thymidine to total DNA, however, was higher in the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method. than by the direct lysis method, suggesting that the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method came primarily from active bacterial cells, whereas that recovered by the direct lysis method may have contained DNA from other sources.     

Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments

Experiments were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different methodological approaches for recovering DNA from soil and sediment bacterial communities: cell extraction followed by lysis and DNA recovery (cell extraction method) versus direct cell lysis and alkaline extraction to recover DNA (direct lysis method). Efficiency of DNA recovery by each method was determined by spectrophotometric absorbance and using a tritiated thymidine tracer. With both procedures, the use of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone was important for the removal of humic compounds to improve the purity of the recovered DNA; without extensive purification, various restriction enzymes failed to cut added target DNA. Milligram quantities of high-purity DNA were recovered from 100-g samples of both soils and sediments by the direct lysis method, which was a greater than 1-order-of-magnitude-higher yield than by the cell extraction method. The ratio of labeled thymidine to total DNA, however, was higher in the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method. than by the direct lysis method, suggesting that the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method came primarily from active bacterial cells, whereas that recovered by the direct lysis method may have contained DNA from other sources.     

DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition.

A simple, rapid method for bacterial lysis and direct extraction of DNA from soils with minimal shearing was developed to address the risk of chimera formation from small template DNA during subsequent PCR. The method was based on lysis with a high-salt extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl) and extended heating (2 to 3 h) of the soil suspension in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and proteinase K. The extraction method required 6 h and was tested on eight soils differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH, including ones from which DNA extraction is difficult. The DNA fragment size in crude extracts from all soils was > 23 kb. Preliminary trials indicated that DNA recovery from two soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria was 92 to 99%. When the method was tested on all eight unseeded soils, microscopic examination of indigenous bacteria in soil pellets before and after extraction showed variable cell lysis efficiency (26 to 92%). Crude DNA yields from the eight soils ranged from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1, and these were positively correlated with the organic carbon content in the soil (r = 0.73). DNA yields from gram-positive bacteria from pure cultures were two to six times higher when the high-salt-SDS-heat method was combined with mortar-and-pestle grinding and freeze-thawing, and most DNA recovered was of high molecular weight. Four methods for purifying crude DNA were also evaluated for percent recovery, fragment size, speed, enzyme restriction, PCR amplification, and DNA-DNA hybridization. In general, all methods produced DNA pure enough for PCR amplification. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics will influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods on the basis of experimental goals.     

Isolation of the Escherichia coli nucleoid

Numerous protocols for the isolation of bacterial nucleoids have been described based on treatment of cells with sucrose-lysozyme-EDTA and subsequent lysis with detergents in the presence of counterions (e.g., NaCl, spermidine). Depending on the lysis conditions both envelope-free and envelope-bound nucleoids could be obtained, often in the same lysate. To investigate the mechanism(s) involved in compacting bacterial DNA in the living cell, we wished to isolate intact nucleoids in the absence of detergents and high concentrations of counterions. Here, we compare the general lysis method using detergents with a procedure involving osmotic shock of Escherichia coli spheroplasts that resulted in nucleoids free of envelope fragments. After staining the DNA with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and cell lysis by either isolation procedure, free-floating nucleoids could be readily visualized in fluorescence microscope preparations. The detergent-salt and the osmotic-shock nucleoids appeared as relatively compact structures under the applied ionic conditions of 1 M and 10 mM, respectively. RNase treatment caused no dramatic changes in the size of either nucleoid.     

Rapid DNA extraction protocol from soil for polymerase chain reaction-mediated amplification

A simple and rapid method of DNA extraction from soil was developed and DNA was made suitable for subsequent efficient amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Key features of the extraction and purification were cold lysozyme- and SDS-assisted lysis with either freezing-thawing or bead beating, cold phenol extraction of the resulting soil suspension, CsCl and KAc precipitation and, finally, spermine-HCl or glass milk purification of DNA. Crude DNA preparations contained 4–20 μg DNA per g of soil extracted, and at least 50% of this was recovered in the final purified DNA preparations. The resulting DNA was pure enough to be restricted by various enzymes, and was amplifiable at concentrations of up to 20 ng of soil-derived DNA per 50 μl reaction mix.
Amplification of a 683 bp target sequence, pat, was performed with different Taq DNA polymerases. Application of the protocol enabled us to detect target DNA derived from roughly 10³ introduced Pseudomonas fluorescens (RP4 :: pat ) cfu per g of soil. The fate of an introduced population in the soil could be followed to this limit with PCR-assisted detection of target DNA. In addition, target DNA was detected in soil 5 months after release, when the introduced organism was no longer detectable on selective agar plates.
The extraction and purification protocol applied to various different soil types resulted in DNA of sufficient purity to permit amplification by PCR.     

Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation

All molecular analyses of soil bacterial diversity are based on the extraction of a representative fraction of cellular DNA. Methods of DNA extraction for this purpose are divided into two categories: those in which cells are lysed within the soil (direct extraction) and those in which cells are first removed from soil (cell extraction) and then lysed. The purpose of this study was to compare a method of direct extraction with a method in which cells were first separated from the soil matrix by Nycodenz gradient centrifugation in order to evaluate the effect of these different approaches on the analysis of the spectrum of diversity in a microbial community. We used a method based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a 16S rRNA gene fragment, followed by hybridization of the amplified fragments to a set of specific probes to assess the phylogenetic diversity of our samples. Control parameters, such as the relationship between amount of DNA template and amount of PCR product and the influence of competing DNA on PCR amplification, were first examined. Comparison between extraction methods showed that less DNA was extracted when cells were first separated from the soil matrix (0.4 µg g⁻¹ dry weight soil versus 38–93 µg g⁻¹ obtained by in situ lysis methods). However, with the exception of the γ-subclass of Proteobacteria, there was no significant difference in the spectrum of diversity resulting from the two extraction strategies.     

Comparison of two bacterial DNA extraction methods from non-polluted and polluted soils

DNA extraction from soil samples is a critical step for molecular biology analyses. The present study compared the efficiency of two DNA isolation methods from non-polluted and polluted soils with or without the presence of a plant. Both applied methods used chemical and physical lyses, but method 1 had an additional physical disruption. The main difference between these two methods was the humic acid purification technique as it was carried out during cell lysis for method 1 and after cell lysis for method 2. Samples were assessed on the basis of their yield and DNA purity as well as their bacterial quantity and diversity. Based on our results, method 1 proved to be more effective at removing protein and RNA, whereas method 2 proved to be more effective at removing humic acids. Although no differences were obtained in terms of the DNA yield, both the bacterial quantity and community structure were affected by the method used. Method 1 allowed for the recovery of more information than method 2, and polluted soil was more sensitive to the DNA extraction procedure. We recommend carefully selecting the DNA extraction method, especially when soil is disturbed.     

一种简单、有效的适于PCR操作的放线菌DNA提取方法

目的:利用改良酶法发展了一种从微量(几百微升)发酵液中快速安全的提取放线菌基因组DNA的方法。方法:利用溶菌酶破壁,蛋白酶K和SDS除蛋白,成功提取较高质量的放线菌基因组DNA,所得的DNA可作为PCR反应的模板进行16SrRNA等基因有效扩增。结果:能从海绵和土壤分离的放线菌中成功提取基因组DNA。结论:该方法操作简单、费用低廉、不使用酚、氯仿等有毒害作用有机试剂,非常适于长期从事放线菌操作的研究人员。为大量放线菌菌株的快速鉴别、高通量筛选和系统分类研究创造了条件。     

Use of a lysoenzyme preparation from Streptomyces recifensis subsp. lyticus 2435 for isolating DNA from staphylococcal cells

It was shown that the preparation 2435 from Streptomyces recifensis subsp. lyticus, including a complex of bacteriolytic and concomitant enzymes provided lysis of thick staphylococcal suspensions within 15 to 20 minutes under optimal conditions after preliminary treatment of the cells with 0.1 M cystein-HCl. A procedure was developed for isolating DNA from the cells of staphylococci and other microorganisms based on enzymatic lysis. In terms of major physicochemical properties, the preparations of DNA were not inferior to the preparations of DNA isolated by the classical Marmur technique with Kirbi's deproteinization and had transforming activity. The developed procedure for isolation of DNA with using the lysoenzyme preparation widened the possibilities of investigating the genetics of staphylococci and other microorganisms.     

Accessing the soil metagenome for studies of microbial diversity

Soil microbial communities contain the highest level of prokaryotic diversity of any environment, and metagenomic approaches involving the extraction of DNA from soil can improve our access to these communities. Most analyses of soil biodiversity and function assume that the DNA extracted represents the microbial community in the soil, but subsequent interpretations are limited by the DNA recovered from the soil. Unfortunately, extraction methods do not provide a uniform and unbiased subsample of metagenomic DNA, and as a consequence, accurate species distributions cannot be determined. Moreover, any bias will propagate errors in estimations of overall microbial diversity and may exclude some microbial classes from study and exploitation. To improve metagenomic approaches, investigate DNA extraction biases, and provide tools for assessing the relative abundances of different groups, we explored the biodiversity of the accessible community DNA by fractioning the metagenomic DNA as a function of (i) vertical soil sampling, (ii) density gradients (cell separation), (iii) cell lysis stringency, and (iv) DNA fragment size distribution. Each fraction had a unique genetic diversity, with different predominant and rare species (based on ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis [RISA] fingerprinting and phylochips). All fractions contributed to the number of bacterial groups uncovered in the metagenome, thus increasing the DNA pool for further applications. Indeed, we were able to access a more genetically diverse proportion of the metagenome (a gain of more than 80% compared to the best single extraction method), limit the predominance of a few genomes, and increase the species richness per sequencing effort. This work stresses the difference between extracted DNA pools and the currently inaccessible complete soil metagenome.     

Detection and quantification of Streptomyces violaceolatus plasmid DNA in soil

Two methods for the direct extraction of DNA from soil were investigated using soil inoculated with Streptomyces violaceolatus ISP5438 harbouring the multicopy plasmid pIJ673. Detection limits for plasmid DNA were determined by Southern blot technique. An SDS/heat lysis method gave approximately two orders of magnitude less sensitivity than lysis and extraction by bead-beating soil inoculated with spores. The use of these two methods allowed differentiation between spore- and mycelial-borne DNA. This was due to the resistance of the spores to lysis when subjected to SDS/heat lysis.     

Lysis efficiency of standard DNA extraction methods for Halococcus spp. in an organic rich environment

The extraction of nucleic acids from a given environment marks a crucial and essential starting point in any molecular investigation. Members of Halococcus spp. are known for their rigid cell walls, and are thus difficult to lyse and could potentially be overlooked in an environment. Furthermore, the lack of a suitable lysis method hinders subsequent molecular analysis. The effects of six different DNA extraction methods were tested on Halococcus hamelinensis, Halococcus saccharolyticus and Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 as well as on an organic rich, highly carbonated sediment from stromatolites spiked with Halococcus hamelinensis. The methods tested were based on physical disruption (boiling and freeze/thawing), chemical lysis (Triton X-100, potassium ethyl xanthogenate (XS) buffer and CTAB) and on enzymatic lysis (lysozyme). Results showed that boiling and freeze/thawing had little effect on the lysis of both Halococcus strains. Methods based on chemical lysis (Triton X-100, XS-buffer, and CTAB) showed the best results, however, Triton X-100 treatment failed to produce visible DNA fragments. Using a combination of bead beating, chemical lysis with lysozyme, and thermal shock, lysis of cells was achieved however DNA was badly sheared. Lysis of cells and DNA extraction of samples from spiked sediment proved to be difficult, with the XS-buffer method indicating the best results. This study provides an evaluation of six commonly used methods of cell lysis and DNA extraction of Halococcus spp., and the suitability of the resulting DNA for molecular analysis.     

A rapid,cost-effective procedure for the extraction of microbial DNA from soil

Here we describe a DNA extraction method that is based on a simple, rapid polyvinylpolypyrrolidone–calcium chloride precipitation to release microorganisms from the soil combined with lysozyme–proteinase–SDS lysis of the microbial community. The extracted DNA is of high quality and allows direct detection of specific genes by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as cloning of indigenous microbial DNA. This method facilitates the extraction of 36 500-mg soil samples simultaneously in a 2-h period by one person. The procedure is safe, inexpensive, and does not require specialized equipment or generate hazardous wastes.     

Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils

In recent years, several protocols based on the extraction of nucleic acids directly from the soil matrix after lysis treatment have been developed for the detection of microorganisms in soil. Extraction efficiency has often been evaluated based on the recovery of a specific gene sequence from an organism inoculated into the soil. The aim of the present investigation was to improve the extraction, purification, and quantification of DNA derived from as large a portion of the soil microbial community as possible, with special emphasis placed on obtaining DNA from gram-positive bacteria, which form structures that are difficult to disrupt. Furthermore, we wanted to identify and minimize the biases related to each step in the procedure. Six soils, covering a range of pHs, clay contents, and organic matter contents, were studied. Lysis was carried out by soil grinding, sonication, thermal shocks, and chemical treatments. DNA was extracted from the indigenous microflora as well as from inoculated bacterial cells, spores, and hyphae, and the quality and quantity of the DNA were determined by gel electrophoresis and dot blot hybridization. Lysis efficiency was also estimated by microscopy and viable cell counts. Grinding increased the extracellular DNA yield compared with the yield obtained without any lysis treatment, but none of the subsequent treatments clearly increased the DNA yield. Phage lambda DNA was inoculated into the soils to mimic the fate of extracellular DNA. No more than 6% of this DNA could be recovered from the different soils. The clay content strongly influenced the recovery of DNA. The adsorption of DNA to clay particles decreased when the soil was pretreated with RNA in order to saturate the adsorption sites. We also investigated different purification techniques and optimized the PCR methods in order to develop a protocol based on hybridization of the PCR products and quantification by phosphorimaging.     

A new method of plasmid DNA preparation by sucrose-mediated detergent lysis from Escherichia coli (gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive)

A simple and cheap method of plasmid DNA preparation from both gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) organism is presented here. In this method, in place of the high-priced chemicals lysostaphin and lysozyme which are commonly used for removal of cell-wall during plasmid DNA preparation from gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, respectively, only sucrose has been used. Firstly, bacteria is treated with Trizma (pH 8.0) containing 100% sucrose (hypertonic solution). Due to this osmotic shock, protoplasm covered by the plasma membrane of bacteria possibly shrinks and becomes detached from the cell-wall. Osmotically sensitive cells thus formed, from gram-positive (S. aureus) and gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria, are finally lysed by the lysis mixture, containing brij 58 and sodium deoxycholate. The lysate is centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min to pellet the cell debris. The supernatant containing plasmid DNA is treated with either polyethylene glycol or isopropanol. The precipitate which contains plasmid DNA is dissolved in a buffer containing Tris, EDTA, NaCl, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (pH 8.0); thus protein is denatured and removed. Finally, RNA is removed by RNase treatment. The average yield of staphylococcal plasmid DNA as well as plasmid pBR322 from E. coli HB101 in 100% sucrose-treated preparations is greater than that of lysostaphin- and lysozyme-treated preparations. This method is applicable for both large-scale and small-scale preparations. The substrate activity for restriction enzyme, cloning, transforming ability, and electron microscopic profile of the plasmid DNA prepared by this method remains unaltered.     

On the isolation of TI-plasmid from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

An efficient lysis method for Agrobacterium cells was developed, which allows a reproducible isolation of the tumor inducing (TI)-plasmid. The lysis method is based on the sensitivity of this bacterium to incubation with lysozyme, n-dodecylamine,EDTA, followed by Sarkosyl, after growth in the presence of carbenicillin. We also present a procedure for the isolation of the TI-plasmid on a large scale, that might be used for the mass isolation of other large plasmids which like the TI-plasmid, can not be cleared with earlier described procedures. The purity of the plasmid preparations was determined with DNA renaturation kinetics, which method has the advantage that the plasmid need not to be in the supercoiled or open circular form.     

Efficiency of DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of soil microeukaryotic diversity

The evaluation of microbial molecular diversity has been mainly based on the extraction of total DNA from environmental samples. The indirect extraction methods, which have been used for prokaryotes, have never been used to recover soil microeukaryotic DNA. We evaluated the efficiency of an improved indirect DNA extraction protocol developed herein and the direct lysis (the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based method and commercial DNA extraction kit) on estimating the molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes. DNA quality and quantity as well as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles were determined using three soil samples from different stations. The indirect method detected the highest DGGE bands in spite of the low DNA yield. The commercial kit detected a lower number of DGGE bands than the indirect method. The SDS-based method produced the lowest DGGE bands and DNA purity but the highest yield. Using the indirect method, we further evaluated the effect of freezing and air-dried preservations on estimating the microeukaryotic diversity. In spite of the low DNA yield obtained from the air-dried preservation, no significant differences were found in either the number of DGGE bands or the DNA purity between two manners. Our results indicate that the improved indirect method could obtain a high purity of intracellular DNA and high efficiency in the estimation of molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes.     

Simple broad-spectrum protocol using labiase for bacterial cell lysis to prepare genomic DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis

We have developed a simple broad-spectrum protocol using labiase for bacterial cell lysis in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. The protocol reported here is widely applicable to the preparations of genomic DNA from Gram-negative and -positive pathogens, including enterococcal strains resistant to any conventional lysis protocols.     

Quantification of Bias Related to the Extraction of DNA Directly from Soils

In recent years, several protocols based on the extraction of nucleic acids directly from the soil matrix after lysis treatment have been developed for the detection of microorganisms in soil. Extraction efficiency has often been evaluated based on the recovery of a specific gene sequence from an organism inoculated into the soil. The aim of the present investigation was to improve the extraction, purification, and quantification of DNA derived from as large a portion of the soil microbial community as possible, with special emphasis placed on obtaining DNA from gram-positive bacteria, which form structures that are difficult to disrupt. Furthermore, we wanted to identify and minimize the biases related to each step in the procedure. Six soils, covering a range of pHs, clay contents, and organic matter contents, were studied. Lysis was carried out by soil grinding, sonication, thermal shocks, and chemical treatments. DNA was extracted from the indigenous microflora as well as from inoculated bacterial cells, spores, and hyphae, and the quality and quantity of the DNA were determined by gel electrophoresis and dot blot hybridization. Lysis efficiency was also estimated by microscopy and viable cell counts. Grinding increased the extracellular DNA yield compared with the yield obtained without any lysis treatment, but none of the subsequent treatments clearly increased the DNA yield. Phage λ DNA was inoculated into the soils to mimic the fate of extracellular DNA. No more than 6% of this DNA could be recovered from the different soils. The clay content strongly influenced the recovery of DNA. The adsorption of DNA to clay particles decreased when the soil was pretreated with RNA in order to saturate the adsorption sites. We also investigated different purification techniques and optimized the PCR methods in order to develop a protocol based on hybridization of the PCR products and quantification by phosphorimaging.