Molecular mechanism underlying inverse agonist of angiotensin II type 1 receptor

To delineate the molecular mechanism underlying the inverse agonist activity of olmesartan, a potent angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, we performed binding affinity studies and an inositol phosphate production assay. Binding affinity of olmesartan and its related compounds to wild-type and mutant AT1 receptors demonstrated that interactions between olmesartan and Tyr113, Lys199, His256, and Gln257 in the AT1 receptor were important. The inositol phosphate production assay of olmesartan and related compounds using mutant receptors indicated that the inverse agonist activity required two interactions, that between the hydroxyl group of olmesartan and Tyr113 in the receptor and that between the carboxyl group of olmesartan and Lys199 and His256 in the receptor. Gln257 was found to be important for the interaction with olmesartan but not for the inverse agonist activity. Based on these results, we constructed a model for the interaction between olmesartan and the AT1 receptor. Although the activation of G protein-coupled receptors is initiated by anti-clockwise rotation of transmembrane (TM) III and TM VI followed by changes in the conformation of the receptor, in this model, cooperative interactions between the hydroxyl group and Tyr113 in TM III and between the carboxyl group and His256 in TM VI were essential for the potent inverse agonist activity of olmesartan. We speculate that the specific interaction of olmesartan with these two TMs is essential for stabilizing the AT1 receptor in an inactive conformation. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the inverse agonism could be useful for the development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists with inverse agonist activity.     

Angiotensin IV is a potent agonist for constitutive active human AT1 receptors. Distinct roles of the N-and C-terminal residues of angiotensin II during AT1 receptor activation

The octapeptide hormone, angiotensin II (Ang II), exerts its major physiological effects by activating AT(1) receptors. In vivo Ang II is degraded to bioactive peptides, including Ang III (angiotensin-(2-8)) and Ang IV (angiotensin-(3-8)). These peptides stimulate inositol phosphate generation in human AT(1) receptor expressing CHO-K1 cells, but the potency of Ang IV is very low. Substitution of Asn(111) with glycine, which is known to cause constitutive receptor activation by disrupting its interaction with the seventh transmembrane helix (TM VII), selectively increased the potency of Ang IV (900-fold) and angiotensin-(4-8), and leads to partial agonism of angiotensin-(5-8). Consistent with the need for the interaction between Arg(2) of Ang II and Ang III with Asp(281), substitution of this residue with alanine (D281A) decreased the peptide's potency without affecting that of Ang IV. All effects of the D281A mutation were superseded by the N111G mutation. The increased affinity of Ang IV to the N111G mutant was also demonstrated by binding studies. A model is proposed in which the Arg(2)-Asp(281) interaction causes a conformational change in TM VII of the receptor, which, similar to the N111G mutation, eliminates the constraining intramolecular interaction between Asn(111) and TM VII. The receptor adopts a more relaxed conformation, allowing the binding of the C-terminal five residues of Ang II that switches this "preactivated" receptor into the fully active conformation.     

Small molecules with similar structures exhibit agonist, neutral antagonist or inverse agonist activity toward angiotensin II type 1 receptor

Small differences in the chemical structures of ligands can be responsible for agonism, neutral antagonism or inverse agonism toward a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Although each ligand may stabilize the receptor conformation in a different way, little is known about the precise conformational differences. We synthesized the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, R239470 and R794847, which induced inverse agonism, antagonism and agonism, respectively, and then investigated the ligand-specific changes in the receptor conformation with respect to stabilization around transmembrane (TM)3. The results of substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies support the novel concept that ligand-induced changes in the conformation of TM3 play a role in stabilizing GPCR. Although the agonist-, neutral antagonist and inverse agonist-binding sites in the AT(1) receptor are similar, each ligand induced specific conformational changes in TM3. In addition, all of the experimental data were obtained with functional receptors in a native membrane environment (in situ).     

Comparative study of three angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in preventing liver fibrosis in diabetic rats: stereology, histopathology, and electron microscopy

The presence of liver disease in patients with progressively worsening insulin resistance may not be recognized until patients develop manifestations of the metabolic syndrome such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and vascular disease. It was aimed to investigate whether three angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) (olmesartan, losartan, and valsartan) had preventive effect against hepatic fibrosis and this was a common characteristic among ARBs. In current study, 25 adult male rats were used and divided into five groups: the non-diabetic healthy group, alloxan induced diabetic (AID) control group, AID losartan group, AID valsartan group and AID olmesartan group. According to numerical density of hepatocytes, significant difference was found between the non-diabetic healthy group and diabetic control group. All treatments groups were significant when compared to diabetic control group. In diabetic control group it was examined swelling, irregular cristae arrangement in some of mitochondria. It was also determined mitochondria membrane degeneration in some areas of section profiles. In diabetic rats treated with losartan group, there were necrotic hepatocytes. In diabetic rats treated with valsartan group, predominantly, findings were similar to losartan group. In diabetic rats treated with olmesertan group, plates of hepatocytes were quite regular. There were hardly necrotic cells. Not only other organelles such as RER, SER and lysosom but also mitochondrial structures had normal appearance. In the diabetic control group electron microscopy revealed edema in both the cytoplasm and perinuclear area and the nuclear membranes appeared damaged. In conclusion, it was established that the most protective ARB the liver in diabetic rats was olmesartan, followed by losartan.     

Long Range Effect of Mutations on Specific Conformational Changes in the Extracellular Loop 2 of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

The topology of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) and its interaction with ligands is unique in each G protein-coupled receptor. When the orthosteric ligand pocket located in the transmembrane (TM) domain is occupied, ligand-specific conformational changes occur in the ECL2. In more than 90% of G protein-coupled receptors, ECL2 is tethered to the third TM helix via a disulfide bond. Therefore, understanding the extent to which the TM domain and ECL2 conformations are coupled is useful. To investigate this, we examined conformational changes in ECL2 of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) by introducing mutations in distant sites that alter the activation state equilibrium of the AT1R. Differential accessibility of reporter cysteines introduced at four conformation-sensitive sites in ECL2 of these mutants was measured. Binding of the agonist angiotensin II (AngII) and inverse agonist losartan in wild-type AT1R changed the accessibility of reporter cysteines, and the pattern was consistent with ligand-specific “lid” conformations of ECL2. Without agonist stimulation, the ECL2 in the gain of function mutant N111G assumed a lid conformation similar to AngII-bound wild-type AT1R. In the presence of inverse agonists, the conformation of ECL2 in the N111G mutant was similar to the inactive state of wild-type AT1R. In contrast, AngII did not induce a lid conformation in ECL2 in the loss of function D281A mutant, which is consistent with the reduced AngII binding affinity in this mutant. However, a lid conformation was induced by [Sar¹,Gln²,Ile⁸] AngII, a specific analog that binds to the D281A mutant with better affinity than AngII. These results provide evidence for the emerging paradigm of domain coupling facilitated by long range interactions at distant sites on the same receptor.     

Manifold active-state conformations in GPCRs: agonist-activated constitutively active mutant AT1 receptor preferentially couples to Gq compared to the wild-type AT1 receptor

The angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) receptor mediates regulation of blood pressure and water-electrolyte balance by Ang II. Substitution of Gly for Asn(111) of the AT(1) receptor constitutively activates the receptor leading to Gq-coupled IP(3) production independent of Ang II binding. The Ang II-activated conformation of the AT1(N111G) receptor was proposed to be similar to that of the wild-type AT(1) receptor, although, various aspects of the Ang II-induced conformation of this constitutively active mutant receptor have not been systematically studied. Here, we provide evidence that the conformation of the active state of the wild-type and the constitutively active AT(1) receptors are different. Upon Ang II binding an activated conformation of the wild-type AT(1) receptor activates G protein and recruits beta-arrestin. In contrast, the agonist-bound AT1(N111G) mutant receptor preferentially couples to Gq and is inadequate in beta-arrestin recruitment.     

Conformational switch of angiotensin II type 1 receptor underlying mechanical stress-induced activation

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that has a crucial role in the development of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Here, we show that cell stretch leads to activation of the AT(1) receptor, which undergoes an anticlockwise rotation and a shift of transmembrane (TM) 7 into the ligand-binding pocket. As an inverse agonist, candesartan suppressed the stretch-induced helical movement of TM7 through the bindings of the carboxyl group of candesartan to the specific residues of the receptor. A molecular model proposes that the tight binding of candesartan to the AT(1) receptor stabilizes the receptor in the inactive conformation, preventing its shift to the active conformation. Our results show that the AT(1) receptor undergoes a conformational switch that couples mechanical stress-induced activation and inverse agonist-induced inactivation.     

Identification of an efficacy switch region in the ghrelin receptor responsible for interchange between agonism and inverse agonism

The carboxyamidated wFwLL peptide was used as a core ligand to probe the structural basis for agonism versus inverse agonism in the constitutively active ghrelin receptor. In the ligand, an efficacy switch could be built at the N terminus, as exemplified by AwFwLL, which functioned as a high potency agonist, whereas KwFwLL was an equally high potency inverse agonist. The wFw-containing peptides, agonists as well as inverse agonists, were affected by receptor mutations covering the whole main ligand-binding pocket with key interaction sites being an aromatic cluster in transmembrane (TM)-VI and -VII and residues on the opposing face of TM-III. Gain-of-function in respect of either increased agonist or inverse agonist potency or swap between high potency versions of these properties was obtained by substitutions at a number of positions covering a broad area of the binding pocket on TM-III, -IV, and -V. However, in particular, space-generating substitutions at position III:04 shifted the efficacy of the ligands from inverse agonism toward agonism, whereas similar substitutions at position III: 08, one helical turn below, shifted the efficacy from agonism toward inverse agonism. It is suggested that the relative position of the ligand in the binding pocket between this "efficacy shift region" on TM-III and the opposing aromatic cluster on TM-VI and TM-VII leads either to agonism, i.e. in a superficial binding mode, or it leads to inverse agonism, i.e. in a more profound binding mode. This relationship between different binding modes and opposite efficacy is in accordance with the Global Toggle Switch model for 7TM receptor activation.     

Molecular mechanisms of constitutive activity: mutations at position 111 of the angiotensin AT1 receptor.

A possible molecular mechanism for the constitutive activity of mutants of the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1) at position 111 was suggested by molecular modeling. This involves a cascade of conformational changes in spatial positions of side chains along transmembrane helix (TM3) from L112 to Y113 to F117, which in turn, results in conformational changes in TM4 (residues I152 and M155) leading to the movement of TM4 as a whole. The mechanism is consistent with the available data of site-directed mutagenesis, as well as with correct predictions of constitutive activity of mutants L112F and L112C. It was also predicted that the double mutant N111G/L112A might possess basal constitutive activity comparable with that of the N111G mutant, whereas the double mutants N111G/Y113A, N111G/F117A, and N111G/I152A would have lower levels of basal activity. Experimental studies of the above double mutants showed significant constitutive activity of N111G/L112A and N111G/F117A. The basal activity of N111G/I152A was higher than expected, and that of N111G/Y113A was not determined due to poor expression of the mutant. The proposed mechanism of constitutive activity of the AT(1) receptor reveals a novel nonsimplistic view on the general problem of constitutive activity, and clearly demonstrates the inherent complexity of the process of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation.     

Reassessment of the Unique Mode of Binding between Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Their Blockers

While the molecular structures of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT₁) receptor blockers (ARBs) are very similar, they are also slightly different. Although each ARB has been shown to exhibit a unique mode of binding to AT₁ receptor, different positions of the AT₁ receptor have been analyzed and computational modeling has been performed using different crystal structures for the receptor as a template and different kinds of software. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the critical positions of the AT₁ receptor, Tyr¹¹³, Tyr¹⁸⁴, Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ using a mutagenesis study, and subsequently performed computational modeling of the binding of ARBs to AT₁ receptor using CXCR4 receptor as a new template and a single version of software. The interactions between Tyr¹¹³ in the AT₁ receptor and the hydroxyl group of olmesartan, between Lys¹⁹⁹ and carboxyl or tetrazole groups, and between His²⁵⁶ or Gln²⁵⁷ and the tetrazole group were studied. The common structure, a tetrazole group, of most ARBs similarly bind to Lys¹⁹⁹, His²⁵⁶ and Gln²⁵⁷ of AT₁ receptor. Lys¹⁹⁹ in the AT₁ receptor binds to the carboxyl group of EXP3174, candesartan and azilsartan, whereas oxygen in the amidecarbonyl group of valsartan may bind to Lys¹⁹⁹. The benzimidazole portion of telmisartan may bind to a lipophilic pocket that includes Tyr¹¹³. On the other hand, the n-butyl group of irbesartan may bind to Tyr¹¹³. In conclusion, we confirmed that the slightly different structures of ARBs may be critical for binding to AT₁ receptor and for the formation of unique modes of binding.     

Synthesis, binding studies and in vivo biological evaluation of novel non-peptide antihypertensive analogues

AT(1) antagonists (SARTANs) constitute the last generation of drugs for the treatment of hypertension, designed and synthesized to mimic the C-terminal segment of the vasoconstrictive hormone angiotensin II (AngII). They exert their action by blocking the binding of AngII on the AT(1) receptor. Up to date eight AT(1) antagonists have been approved for the regulation of high blood pressure. Although these molecules share common structural features and are designed to act under the same mechanism, they have differences in their pharmacological profiles and antihypertensive efficacy. Thus, there is still a need for novel analogues with better pharmacological and financial profiles. An example of a novel synthetic non peptide AT(1) antagonist which devoids the classical template of SARTANs is MM1. In vivo studies showed that MMK molecules, which fall in the same class of MM1, had a significant antihypertensive (40-80% compared to the drug losartan) activity. However, in vitro affinity studies showed that losartan has considerably higher affinity. The theoretical docking studies showed that MM1 acts on the same site of the receptor as losartan. They exert hydrophobic interactions with amino acid Val108 of the third helix of the AT(1) receptor and other hydrophobic amino acids in spatial vicinity. In addition, losartan favours multiple hydrogen bondings between its tetrazole group with Lys199. These additional interactions may in part explain its higher in vitro binding affinity.     

Three distinct epitopes on the extracellular face of the glucagon receptor determine specificity for the glucagon amino terminus

The glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are homologous family B seven-transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptors, and they selectively recognize the homologous peptide hormones glucagon (29 amino acids) and GLP-1 (30-31 amino acids), respectively. The amino-terminal extracellular domain of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors (140-150 amino acids) determines specificity for the carboxyl terminus of glucagon and GLP-1, respectively. In addition, the glucagon receptor core domain (7TM helices and connecting loops) strongly determines specificity for the glucagon amino terminus. Only 4 of 15 residues are divergent in the glucagon and GLP-1 amino termini; Ser2, Gln3, Tyr10, and Lys12 in glucagon and the corresponding Ala8, Glu9, Val16, and Ser18 in GLP-1. In this study, individual substitution of these four residues of glucagon with the corresponding residues of GLP-1 decreased the affinity and potency at the glucagon receptor relative to glucagon. Substitution of distinct segments of the glucagon receptor core domain with the corresponding segments of the GLP-1 receptor rescued the affinity and potency of specific glucagon analogs. Site-directed mutagenesis identified the Asp385 --> Glu glucagon receptor mutant that specifically rescued Ala2-glucagon. The results show that three distinct epitopes of the glucagon receptor core domain determine specificity for the N terminus of glucagon. We suggest a glucagon receptor binding model in which the extracellular ends of TM2 and TM7 are close to and determine specificity for Gln3 and Ser2 of glucagon, respectively. Furthermore, the second extracellular loop and/or proximal segments of TM4 and/or TM5 are close to and determine specificity for Lys12 of glucagon.     

Molecular basis of melanocortin-4 receptor for AGRP inverse agonism

We have investigated receptor structural components of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) responsible for ligand-dependent inverse agonism. We utilized agouti-related protein (AGRP), an inverse agonist which reduces MC4R basal cAMP production, as a tool to determine the molecular mechanism. We tested a series of chimeric receptors and utilized MC4R and MC1R as templates, in which AGRP is an inverse agonist for MC4R but not for MC1R. Our results indicate that replacements of the extracellular loops 1, 2 and 3 of MC4R with the corresponding regions of MC1R did not affect AGRP inverse agonist activity. However, replacement of the N terminus of MC4R with the same region of MC1R decreases AGRP inverse agonism. Replacement of transmembrane domains 3, 4, 5 and 6 of MC4R with the corresponding regions of MC1R did not affect AGRP inverse agonist activity but mutation of D90A in transmembrane 2 (TM2) and D298A in TM7 abolished AGRP inverse activity. Deletion of the distal MC4R C terminus fails to maintain AGRP mediated reduction in basal cAMP production although it maintains NDP-MSH mediated cAMP production. In conclusion, our results indicate that the N terminus and the distal C terminus of MC4R do appear to play important roles in AGRP inverse agonism but not NDP-MSH mediated receptor activation. Our results also indicate that the residues D90 in TM2 and D298 in TM7 of hMC4R are involved in not only NDP-MSH mediated receptor activation but also AGRP mediated inverse agonism.     

Irbesartan attenuates ischemic brain damage by inhibition of MCP-1/CCR2 signaling pathway beyond AT₁ receptor blockade

Angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to prevent the onset of stroke and to attenuate neural damage. Additional beneficial effects of ARBs, independent of AT(1) receptor blockade, have been highlighted. Irbesartan is reported to act as an antagonist of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) receptor, C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), due to its molecular structure. We examined the possible synergistic effects of co-administration of irbesartan with propagermanium, a CCR2 antagonist, on ischemic brain damage. Administration of propagermanium decreased ischemic brain area after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). To study the possible synergistic effects of propagermanium with ARBs, we employed non-effective lower doses of irbesartan and losartan. Administration of irbesartan with propagermanium decreased the ischemic brain area more markedly compared with propagermanium alone, but co-administration of losartan did not. MCP-1 mRNA level was significantly increased on the ipsilateral side after MCAO, and administration of irbesartan with propagermanium decreased the MCP-1 level, whereas co-administration of losartan did not. Similar results were obtained for MCP-1 protein level. CCR2 mRNA expression was significantly elevated on the ipsilateral side; however, no significant difference was observed between each group. mRNA levels of other inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β also significantly increased on the ipsilateral side, but the expression levels were not changed by each drug treatment. Taking these findings together, irbesartan exerts more beneficial effects on ischemic brain damage with an MCP-1 receptor blocker, at least due to its inhibitory effects on MCP-1/CCR2 signaling beyond AT(1) receptor blockade.     

Constitutive internalization of constitutively active agiotensin II AT(1A) receptor mutants is blocked by inverse agonists.

As constitutively active mutants (CAMs) mimic an active conformation, they can be used to characterize the process of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Here, we used CAMs to study the link between activation and internalization of the angiotensin II AT(1A) receptor. The cellular localization of fluorescently tagged N111A, I245T, and L305Q mutants was determined by confocal microscopy. In the absence of ligand, CAMs were mostly located in intracellular vesicles, whereas the wild-type AT(1A) was found at the cell surface. After 2 h incubation with inverse agonist, losartan, CAMs were translocated to the plasma membrane. Similar observations were made in H295, a human adrenocortical cell line which expresses physiologically the AT(1) receptor. This phenomenon, which was not dependent on protein synthesis and the pharmacology and kinetics of which were similar to the recycling of the wild-type receptor, was called "externalization". After externalization and losartan removal, the L305Q CAM underwent rapid ligand-independent endocytosis, with the same kinetics and temperature sensitivity as the angiotensin II-induced internalization of the wild-type AT(1A). Moreover, the addition of a second mutation known to block internalization (Delta 329 truncation) prevented intracellular localization of the CAM. These data show that AT(1A) CAMs are constitutively and permanently internalized and recycled. This mechanism is different from the down-regulation observed for CAMs of other G protein-coupled receptors and thus defines a new paradigm for the cellular regulation of CAMs.     

Constitutive precoupling to G(i) and increased agonist potency in the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor

The human alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2B)-AR) was mutated by substituting the D(3.49) aspartate in position 109 with an alanine (alpha(2B)-D109A) in the conserved DRY sequence at the cytoplasmic face of TM3. We studied the effects of the mutation on agonist binding and on receptor activation in CHO cells, including possible inverse agonism monitored by measuring intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)). The mutated receptor had increased binding affinity for agonists, especially dexmedetomidine (3.8-fold). The increased affinity was abolished by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. The mutation produced constitutive receptor activity evidenced as increased basal [Ca(2+)](i) and increased potency and efficacy of agonists to elicit Ca(2+) responses. The imidazoline derivative RX821002 functioned as an inverse agonist only through the alpha(2B)-D109A, reducing [Ca(2+)](i). The results thus indicate that this mutation causes constitutive receptor-G(i)-protein precoupling, and that the D(3.49) aspartate residue of the DRY motif is involved in controlling coupled and uncoupled conformations of alpha(2B)-AR.     

Association of beta-Arrestin 1 with the type 1A angiotensin II receptor involves phosphorylation of the receptor carboxyl terminus and correlates with receptor internalization

Arrestins bind to phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors and participate in receptor desensitization and endocytosis. Although arrestins traffic with activated type 1 (AT(1A)) angiotensin II (AngII) receptors, the contribution of arrestins to AT(1A) receptor internalization is controversial, and the physical association of arrestins with the AT(1A) receptor has not been established. In this study, by coimmunoprecipitating AT(1A) receptors and beta-arrestin 1, we provide direct evidence for an association between arrestins and the AT(1A) receptor that was agonist- and time-dependent and contingent upon the level of beta-arrestin 1 expression. Serial truncation of the receptor carboxyl terminus resulted in a graded loss of beta-arrestin 1 association, which correlated with decreases in receptor phosphorylation. Truncation of the AT(1A) receptor to lysine(325) prevented AngII-induced phosphorylation and beta-arrestin 1 association as well as markedly inhibiting receptor internalization, indicating a close correlation between these receptor parameters. AngII-induced association was also dramatically reduced in a phosphorylation- and internalization-impaired receptor mutant in which four serine and threonine residues in the central portion of the AT(1A) receptor carboxyl terminus (Thr(332), Ser(335), Thr(336), Ser(338)) were substituted with alanine. In contrast, substitutions in another serine/threonine-rich region (Ser(346), Ser(347), Ser(348)) and at three PKC phosphorylation sites (Ser(331), Ser(338), Ser(348)) had no effect on AngII-induced beta-arrestin 1 association or receptor internalization. While AT(1A) receptor internalization could be inhibited by a dominant-negative beta-arrestin 1 mutant (beta arr1(319-418)), treatment with hyperosmotic sucrose to inhibit internalization did not abrogate the differences in arrestin association observed between the wild-type and mutant receptors, indicating that arrestin binding precedes, and is not dependent upon, receptor internalization. Interestingly, a substituted analog of AngII, [Sar(1)Ile(4)Ile(8)]-AngII, which promotes robust phosphorylation of the receptor but does not activate receptor signaling, stimulated strong beta-arrestin 1 association with the full-length AT(1A) receptor. These results identify the central portion of the AT(1A) receptor carboxyl terminus as the important determinant for beta-arrestin 1 binding and internalization and indicate that AT(1A) receptor phosphorylation is crucial for beta-arrestin docking.     

Interaction of linear and cyclic peptide antagonists at the human B(2) kinin receptor

The ligand receptor interactions involving the C-terminal moiety of kinin B(2) receptor antagonists Icatibant (H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-Ser-Dtic-Oic-Arg-OH), MEN 11270 (H-DArg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-c(Dab-Dtic-Oic-Arg)c(7gamma-10alpha)) and a series of analogs modified in position 10 were investigated by radioligand-binding experiments at the wild type (WT) and at the Ser(111)Ala and Ser(111)Lys mutant human kinin B(2) receptors. Icatibant and [Lys(10)]-Icatibant maintained the same high affinity towards the three receptors. For Icatibant-NH(2), [Ala(10)]-Icatibant, MEN 11270 and [Glu(10)]-MEN 11270, the changes in affinity at the WT and Ser(111)Lys receptors indicated that the presence of a net positive or negative charge at the C-terminal moiety of these peptides caused a decrease in affinity to the WT receptor and that Ser(111) residue is in proximity of the side chain of residue 10. The changes in affinity measured with [desArg(10)]-Icatibant and [desArg(10)]-Icatibant-NH(2), moreover, confirmed that a C-terminal charge compensation between the positive charge of Arg(10) side chain and the C-terminal free carboxylic function favours a high affinity interaction.     

Activation and inactivation of volume-sensitive taurine efflux from rat mammary gland

Persistent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after reperfused myocardial infarction (RMI) is a significant problem and angiotensin II (AngII) type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers (ARBs) may limit reperfusion injury involving upregulation of AngII type 2 receptors (AT2R). To determine whether ARBs valsartan and irbesartan limit reperfusion injury and upregulate AT2R protein during RMI, we randomized dogs with anterior RMI (90 min ischemia; 120 min reperfusion) to 4 groups [valsartan (n = 6); irbesartan (n = 9); vehicle controls (n = 8); and sham (n = 6)] and measured serial in vivo hemodynamics, LV systolic and diastolic function, and inhibition of AngII pressor responses to the ARBs, and ex vivo infarct size, and regional AT1R and AT2R protein expression at the end of the reperfusion. Compared to the control group, both ARBs significantly limited the increase in left atrial pressure, promptly limited the deterioration of LV dP/dtmax, dP/dtmin, ejection fraction and diastolic function, limited infarct expansion and thinning, and limited infarct size. Importantly, both ARBs increased AT2R protein in the postischemic reperfused zone, with no change in AT1R protein. There were no changes in the sham group. The results suggest that limitation of myocardial injury associated with AT1R blockade combined with upregulation of AT2R protein expression contributes to the cardioprotective effects of ARBs during RMI. This beneficial effect of ARBs on persistent LV dysfunction after RMI should be evaluated in the clinical setting to determine the relative benefit of ARBs in patients who undergo reperfusion therapy for acute coronary syndromes.     

Analysis of the third transmembrane domain of the human type 1 angiotensin II receptor by cysteine scanning mutagenesis

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TMD) following agonist binding. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which is a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TMD helices. Using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method, we identified the residues within the third TMD of the wild-type angiotensin II (AT1) receptor that contribute to the formation of the binding site pocket. Each residue within the Ile103-Tyr127 region was mutated one at a time to a cysteine. Treating the A104C, N111C, and L112C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) strongly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD3 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, two additional mutants (S109C and V116C) were found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes a minor counterclockwise rotation of TMD3, thereby exposing residues, which are not present in the inactive state, to the binding pocket. This pattern of accessibility of residues in the TMD3 of the AT1 receptor parallels that of homologous residues in rhodopsin. This study identified key elements of TMD3 that contribute to the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors through structural rearrangements.