A comparison of clinical outcomes following atrial fibrillation ablation for heart failure patients with preserved or reduced left ventricular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis review aims to determine if patients who undergo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) do better, or worse or the same compared to patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).MethodsA search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using the search terms: “atrial fibrillation”, “ablation” and terms related to HFpEF and HFrEF in order to identify studies that evaluated one or more of i) AF recurrence, ii) periprocedural complications and iii) adverse outcomes at follow up for patients with HFpEF and HFrEF who underwent AF ablation. Data was extracted from included studies and statistically pooled to evaluate adverse events and AF recurrence.Results5 studies were included in this review and the sample size of the studies ranged from 91 to 521 patients with heart failure. There was no significant difference in the pooled rate for no AF or symptom recurrence after AF ablation comparing patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF (RR 1.07 95%CI 0.86–1.33, p = 0.15). The most common complications were access site complications/haematoma/bleeding which occurred in similar proportion in each group; HFpEF (3.1%) and HFrEF (3.1%). In terms of repeat ablations, two studies were pooled to yield a rate of 78/455 (17.1%) for HFpEF vs 24/279 (8.6%) for HFrEF (p = 0.001.ConclusionsHeart failure patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction have similar risk of AF or symptom recurrence after AF ablation but two studies suggest that patients with HFpEF are more likely to have repeat ablations.     

Características y resultados tras un año en pacientes ancianos ingresados con insuficiencia cardiaca y fracción de eyección reducida,intermedia o conservada

IntroductionThe latest European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure (HF) guidelines define three types of HF according to the ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) when EF < 40%, HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), when EF 40-49%, and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) when EF ≥ 50%. The objective of this study was to analyse the characteristics and results of elderly patients hospitalised with HF according to the new classification using EF.MethodsA prospective study was carried out with 531 HF patients aged ≥ 75 years classified according to EF, and admitted in the geriatric wards of 6 hospitals in Spain. An analysis was performed on the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as well as the morbidity and mortality at one year of follow-up.ResultsAs regards EF, 17.1% had HFrEF, 10% had HFmrEF, and 72.9% had HFpEF. Patients with HFmrEF were more similar to those with HFrEF in terms of a younger age, predominance of men, and previous admission due to HF. This was also the case with the use of drugs for neurohormonal blockade. Patients with HFrEF (compared to those with HFmrEF and HFpEF), had higher mortality (35.2%, 24.5%, and 25.6%, respectively), more readmissions for HF (17.6%, 15.1%, and 14.5%, respectively), and more events (61.5%, 45.3%, and 52.5%, respectively), although there were no significant differences. There were also no differences observed in the survival analysis between the EF groups and the time-dependent outcome variables.ConclusionsIn elderly patients hospitalised with HF, those classified as HFmrEF did not show any clear differences with respect to those with HFrEF or HFpEF. There were no differences in terms of morbidity and mortality.     

HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF的临床特征及左心室重塑对比分析

目的:探讨射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)、射血分数中间范围的心衰(HFmr EF)和射血分数下降的心衰(HFr EF)患者临床特征及左心室重塑的差别。方法:选取2013年2月1日至2016年12月31日在我院心内住院的308名心力衰竭患者作为研究对象,根据入院后首次心脏彩超结果,按左室射血分数(LVEF)将入选的心力衰竭患者分为HFr EF组、HFmr EF组和HFpEF组,回顾性分析所有患者的临床一般资料、化验结果、超声数据和用药情况,对比分析3组患者的临床特征及左心室重塑的差别。结果:HFpEF组为123例(39.9%),HFmr EF组为98例(31.5%),HFr EF组为88例(28.6%);其中HFpEF组女性比例高于HFr EF组(59.4%vs.38.6%,P0.05),高血压和房颤患病率HFpEF组高于HFr EF组(P0.05);HFpEF组左心室重构类型以向心性重塑为主,HFr EF组则以离心性重塑为主;HFmr EF组女性比例及高血压、房颤患病率等临床特征及左心室重塑类型分布则介于HFpEF组与HFr EF之间。结论:HFpEF,HFmr EF与HFr EF组患者临床特点及左心室重塑类型分布显著不同,应对不同左室射血分数的心力衰竭患者采取更有针对性的治疗措施。     

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Background: A significant proportion of heart failure (HF) patients have preserved ejection fraction (EF). Considering that inflammation and oxidative stress are involved in HF evolution, we investigated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LpPLA2), an enzyme involved in these pathophysiologic processes in relation to EF.

Methods and results: The study included 208 HF patients and 20 healthy controls. HF patients with preserved EF (HFpEF) represented 42.31% of all HF patients. LpPLA2 activity was significantly increased in HF patients when compared with controls and was higher in HFpEF than in HF with reduced EF patients (HFrEF). The incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy was higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF (EF < 50).

Conclusion: Confirming its role as a marker of vascular inflammation, LpPLA2 seems to be a biomarker constantly correlated with HF, regardless of etiology. Elevated plasma values of LpPLA2 in HFpEF are consistent with the exacerbated inflammatory status.     

射血分数保留的老年心力衰竭患者的临床特征

目的:分析和比较射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFp EF)、射血分数中间值(HFmr EF)及射血分数降低的老年心力衰竭(HFr EF)患者临床特征的差异。方法:选取2017年9月至2018年8月哈尔滨市第一医院收治的老年慢性心力衰竭患者共287例,根据心动超声所测左室舒张末期内径(LVEF)值将其分为3组:HFpEF组175例、HFmr EF组50例和HFr EF组62例。比较各组患者一般情况、心动超声检查结果、血清学指标的差异。结果:(1)与HFr EF组患者比较,HFpEF组患者年龄、性别、吸烟史、体重指数(BMI)、原发冠心病、高血压、2型糖尿病患者比例、房颤发生率及心功能分级构成比均具有统计学差异(P0.05);(2)与HFr EF组相比较,HFpEF组患者的E/A比值,左房内径、肺动脉内径、LVEDD较小,而室间隔厚度较厚(P0.05);(3)与HFr EF组患者相比,HFpEF组血清总胆固醇、甘油三酯较高;血肌酐、血尿素氮、血尿酸、超敏C反应蛋白、N-末端脑钠肽前体水平较低,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:老年HFpEF心力衰竭患者以女性居多,体重指数较大,以向心性肥胖为主,血压水平较高,心功能II级者比例高,有明显的舒张功能不全,易发生房性心律失常,房颤发生率高,主要病因为高血压。     

Proteomics of epicardial adipose tissue in patients with heart failure

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a metabolically active visceral fat depot closely linked to the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). But the molecular signatures related to the mechanism of HF have not been systematically explored. Here, we present comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT in HF patients and non‐HF patients as controls. A total of 771 proteins were identified in liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry experiments. Amongst them, 17 increased in abundance in HF and seven decreased. They were involved in HF‐related processes including inflammation and oxidative stress response and lipid metabolism. Of these proteins, serine proteinase inhibitor A3 (Serpina3) levels in EAT were highly up‐regulated in HF, with HF/non‐HF ratio of 4.63 (P = .0047). Gene expression of Serpina3 via quantitative polymerase chain reaction was significantly increased in the HF group. ELISA analysis confirmed a significant increase in circulating plasma Serpina3 levels in the HF group (P = .004). In summary, for the first time, we describe that parts of EAT proteome may be reactive and work as modulators of HF. Our profiling provides a comprehensive basis for linking EAT with pathogenesis of HF. Understanding the role of EAT may offer new insights into the treatment of HF.     

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women: the Dutch Queen of Hearts program

Heart failure (HF) poses a heavy burden on patients, their families and society. The syndrome of HF comes in two types: with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The latter is on the increase and predominantly present in women, especially the older ones. There is an urgent need for mortality-reducing drugs in HFpEF, a disease affecting around 5 % of those aged 65 years and over. HFpEF develops in patients with risk factors and comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, COPD, but also preeclampsia. These conditions are likely to drive microvascular disease with involvement of the coronary microvasculature, which may eventually evolve into HFpEF. Currently, the diagnosis of HFPEF relies mainly on echocardiography. There are no biomarkers that can help diagnose female microvascular disease or facilitate the diagnosis of (early stages of) HFpEF. Recently a Dutch consortium was initiated, Queen of Hearts, with support from the Netherlands Heart Foundation, with the aim to discover and validate biomarkers for diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF in women. These biomarkers come from innovative blood-derived sources such as extracellular vesicles and circulating cells. Within the Queen of Hearts consortium, we will pursue female biomarkers that have the potential for further evolution in assays with point of care capabilities. As a spin-off, the consortium will gain knowledge on gender-specific pathology of HFpEF, possibly opening up novel treatment options.     

A pilot study of angiogenin in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a novel potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis?

Characteristics of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) have not yet been fully understood. The objectives of this pilot study are to detect protein expression profile in the sera of HFPEF patients, and to identify potential biomarkers for the disease. Five hundred and seven proteins were detected in the sera of healthy volunteers and patients with either HFPEF or hypertension using antibody microarrays (three in each group). The results showed that the serum concentrations of 17 proteins (e.g. angiogenin, activin A and artemin) differed considerably between HFPEF and non‐HFPEF patients (hypertensive patients and healthy controls), while a protein expression pattern distinct from that in non‐HFPEF patients was associated with HFPEF patients. The up‐regulation of angiogenin in both HFPEF patients with LVEF ≥50% (P = 0.004) and a subset of HFPEF patients with LVEF = 41–49% (P < 0.001) was further validated in 16 HFPEF patients and 16 healthy controls. Meanwhile, angiogenin distinguished HFPEF patients from controls with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (P < 0.001) and a diagnostic cut‐off point of 426 ng/ml. Moreover, the angiogenin levels in HFPEF patients were positively correlated with Lg(N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, NT‐proBNP) (P < 0.001). In addition, high angiogenin level (≥426 ng/ml) was a predictor of all‐cause death within a short‐term follow‐up duration, but not in the longer term of 36 months. This pilot study indicates that the aforementioned 17 potential biomarkers, such as angiogenin, may hold great promise for both diagnosis and prognosis assessment of HFPEF.     

Usefulness of parathyroid hormone as a predictor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Objective: To investigate the relation between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) in outpatients.

Methods: One hundred consecutive patients who had preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and heart failure (HF) symptoms, were enrolled. Echocardiography, assessing the diastolic functions was performed. Blood samples were collected for intact PTH and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).

Results: Significant correlations between PTH level and predictors of advanced HF-PEF were found (p < 0.05). PTH level and left atrium diameter were found to be independent predictors of DHF.

Conclusion: Measurement of serum PTH provides complementary information for the diagnosis and prognosis of HF-PEF.     

Chronic low‐grade inflammation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is currently the predominant form of HF with a dramatic increase in risk with age. Low‐grade inflammation, as occurs with aging (termed “inflammaging”), is a common feature of HFpEF pathology. Suppression of proinflammatory pathways has been associated with attenuated HFpEF disease severity and better outcomes. From this perspective, inflammasome signaling plays a central role in mediating chronic inflammation and cardiovascular disease progression. However, the causal link between the inflammasome‐immune signaling axis on the age‐dependent progression of HFpEF remains conjectural. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the role of inflammatory pathways in age‐dependent cardiac function decline. We will also evaluate recent advances and evidence regarding the inflammatory pathway in the pathophysiology of HFpEF, with special attention to inflammasome signaling.     

Asymmetrical myocardial expression of natriuretic peptides in pacing-induced heart failure

High-frequency pacing of the left ventricle (LV) free wall causes a dyssynchronous pattern of contraction that leads to progressive heart failure (HF) with pronounced differences in regional contractility. Aim of this study was to evaluate possible changes in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) mRNA expression in the anterior/anterior lateral region (pacing site, PS) as compared to the infero-septal region (opposite site, OS) and to explore possible association between the contractiling pattern and biomarker expression. Cardiac tissue was collected from minipigs with pacing-induced HF (n = 8) and without (control, n = 6). The samples were selectively harvested from the anterior left ventricular (LV) wall, PS, and from an area remote to the pacing-site, OS. BNP and CNP mRNA expression was evaluated by semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A significant difference in BNP expression was found in the PS between HF animals and controls (BNP/GAPDH: 0.65 ± 0.11 vs. 0.35 ± 0.04, p = 0.02), but not in the OS (BNP/GAPDH: 0.36 ± 0.05, ns vs. controls). CNP expression was not different compared to controls, although higher levels were observed in the PS and in the OS with respect to the controls (CNP/GAPDH: controls 0.089 ± 0.036, PS 0.289 ± 0.23, OS 0.54 ± 0.16). This finding was in tune with an increase of CNP tissue concentration (controls: 0.69 ± 0.13; PS = 1.56 ± 0.19; OS = 1.70 ± 0.42 pg/mg protein; p = 0.039 controls vs. OS). Higher BNP mRNA expression in the PS is consistent with a reduction in contractile function in this region, while higher CNP mRNA expression in the OS suggests the presence of concomitant endothelial dysfunction in the remote region.     

Biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Biomarkers are widely used and studied in heart failure. Most studies have described the utility and performance of biomarkers in sub-studies of randomised clinical trials, where the vast majority of the patients suffered from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and not with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As a result, there is a scarcity of data describing the levels, dynamics, clinical and biochemical correlates, and biology of biomarkers in patients suffering from HFpEF, whereas HFpEF is in fact a very frequent clinical entity. This article discusses the value of different biomarkers in HFpEF. We describe various aspects of natriuretic peptide measurements in HFpEF patients, with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis and the risk prediction of developing heart failure. Further, we will discuss several emerging biomarkers such as galectin-3 and suppression of tumorigenicity 2, and recently discovered ones such as growth differentiation factor-15 and syndecan-1.     

Early calcium handling imbalance in pressure overload-induced heart failure with nearly normal left ventricular ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common clinical syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic options are limited due to a lack of knowledge of the pathology and its evolution. We investigated the cellular phenotype and Ca²⁺ handling in hearts recapitulating HFpEF criteria. HFpEF was induced in a portion of male Wistar rats four weeks after abdominal aortic banding. These animals had nearly normal ejection fraction and presented elevated blood pressure, lung congestion, concentric hypertrophy, increased LV mass, wall stiffness, impaired active relaxation and passive filling of the left ventricle, enlarged left atrium, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Left ventricular cell contraction was stronger and the Ca²⁺ transient larger. Ca²⁺ cycling was modified with a RyR2 mediated Ca²⁺ leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and impaired Ca²⁺ extrusion through the Sodium/Calcium exchanger (NCX), which promoted an increase in diastolic Ca²⁺. The Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ ATPase (SERCA2a) and NCX protein levels were unchanged. The phospholamban (PLN) to SERCA2a ratio was augmented in favor of an inhibitory effect on the SERCA2a activity. Conversely, PLN phosphorylation at the calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII)-specific site (PLN-Thr17), which promotes SERCA2A activity, was increased as well, suggesting an adaptive compensation of Ca²⁺ cycling. Altogether our findings show that cardiac remodeling in hearts with a HFpEF status differs from that known for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. These data also underscore the interdependence between systolic and diastolic “adaptations” of Ca²⁺ cycling with complex compensative interactions between Ca²⁺ handling partner and regulatory proteins.     

Increased circulating IgG levels,myocardial immune cells and IgG deposits support a role for an immune response in pre‐ and end‐stage heart failure

The chronic inflammatory response plays an important role in adverse cardiac remodelling and the development of heart failure (HF). There is also evidence that in the pathogenesis of several cardiovascular diseases, chronic inflammation is accompanied by antibody and complement deposits in the heart, suggestive of a true autoimmune response. However, the role of antibody‐mediated immune responses in HF progression is less clear. We assessed whether immune cell infiltration and immunoglobulin levels are associated with HF type and disease stage, taking sex differences into account. We found IgG deposits and increased infiltration of immune cells in the affected myocardium of patients with end‐stage HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 20). Circulating levels of IgG1 and IgG3 were elevated in these patients. Furthermore, the percentage of transitional/regulatory B cells was decreased (from 6.9% to 2.4%) compared with healthy controls (n = 5). Similarly, increased levels of circulating IgG1 and IgG3 were observed in men with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD, n = 5), possibly an early stage of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). In conclusion, IgG deposits and infiltrates of immune cells are present in end‐stage HFrEF. In addition, both LVDD patients and end‐stage HFrEF patients show elevated levels of circulating IgG1 and IgG3, suggesting an antibody‐mediated immune response upon cardiac remodelling, which in the early phase of remodelling appear to differ between men and women. These immunoglobulin subclasses might be used as marker for pre‐stage HF and its progression. Future identification of auto‐antigens might open possibilities for new therapeutic interventions.     

Metabolomic Fingerprint of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly recognized as an important clinical entity. Preclinical studies have shown differences in the pathophysiology between HFpEF and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Therefore, we hypothesized that a systematic metabolomic analysis would reveal a novel metabolomic fingerprint of HFpEF that will help understand its pathophysiology and assist in establishing new biomarkers for its diagnosis.ConclusionsThe metabolomics approach employed in this study identified a unique metabolomic fingerprint of HFpEF that is distinct from that of HFrEF. This metabolomic fingerprint has been utilized to identify two novel panels of metabolites that can separate HFpEF patients from both non-HF controls and HFrEF patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02052804","term_id":"NCT02052804"}}NCT02052804     

Effects of endogenous serum neuregulin-1β on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Abstract

Context: Improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following administration of recombinant human Neuregulin-1β (NRG), epidermal growth factor (EGF) involved in cardiomyocyte repair/survival, has been observed in patients with systolic heart failure (HF).

Methods: Serum NRG was measured by ELISA in 248 patients with NYHA class I–IV HF.

Results: NRG exhibited a marginally significant effect on LVEF trajectory over 11?months (p?=?0.07). There is no apparent level of NRG that predicts improved survival.

Conclusions: There is a potential relationship between serum NRG and improved LVEF, indicating the need to investigate the utility of NRG in predicting HF outcomes, including LVEF maintenance.     

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low levels of natriuretic peptides

Aims

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and its management remains difficult. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are used to diagnose heart failure, and as an entry criterion for inclusion into trials. We investigated a population of HFpEF patients who had been randomised into a study based on clinical parameters, and compared those with low BNP levels to those with elevated BNP levels.

Methods

We examined patients who had been enrolled in the Coordinating study evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counselling in Heart Failure (COACH), with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40 %), and compared those with low BNP (< 100 pg/ml; n = 30) to those with elevated BNP (≥ 100 pg/ml; n = 127). Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, quality of life, and outcome parameters (hospitalisations and death) were compared between the groups. To validate our findings, we repeated all analyses for NT-proBNP (< 300 pg/ml and ≥ 300 pg/ml).

Results

Patients were similar with regard to most clinical characteristics (including age, sex, and LVEF), biomarkers, and comorbidities. In contrast, patients with a low BNP had higher body mass index levels (31 kg/m² vs. 27 kg/m²; p < 0.01) and lower cardiac troponin I (9 pg/ml vs. 15 pg/ml; p = 0.02). In addition, these patients were less frequently prescribed diuretics and beta-blockers. No differences in quality of life, heart failure related symptoms and the primary and secondary outcomes were observed between these groups. These observations were confirmed for NT-proBNP.

Conclusion

Among the patients with clinically diagnosed HFpEF, those with low BNP are strikingly similar to those with elevated BNP levels, except for BMI, which was significantly higher in these patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-016-0816-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复对射血分数降低的心力衰竭疗效的研究

目的:探讨诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复对射血分数降低(HFr EF)的心力衰竭(HF)的临床疗效。方法:将我院心内科于2018年1月～2019年4月收治的70例HFr EF患者随机分为两组,各35例。对照组均给予诺欣妥规范治疗,实验组在此基础上根据心肺运动测试(CPET)测得代谢当量制定个性化心脏运动康复,包括院内、院外心脏康复干预及定期随访,为期6个月。采用彩色心脏超声诊断仪、心肺运动测试(CPET)分析两组治疗前后心肺功能变化,同时观察住院及随访期间的预后情况。结果:治疗6个月后,两组左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)均明显改善,且实验组显著优于对照组(P0.05)。治疗6个月后,实验组AT明显升高,峰值VO2/kg、峰值VO2水平均有一定程度上升,且明显优于对照组(P0.05)。与对照组比较,实验组90d内HF再住院率(8.6%vs.28.6%)、随访期间MACEs发生率(17.1%vs.40.0%)均显著降低(P0.05)。结论:诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复治疗可使HFr EF患者显著获益,在改善心肺功能、运动能力及近期预后方面疗效显著,可作为HFr EF患者的一线治疗方案。     

沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的临床研究

摘要 目的：观察沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(heart failure with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)患者的效果。方法：选取2018年1月-2018年12月内蒙古自治区人民医院心脏中心心血管内科收治的90例HFrEF患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。对照组患者常规抗心衰治疗,其中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂（angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor,ACEI）为盐酸贝那普利;观察组患者将常规抗心衰治疗中的ACEI替换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠,两组患者均治疗1月。比较两组患者治疗的总有效率、血浆N端前脑钠肽（N-terminal pro-B-type natriaretic peptide,NT-proBNP）、血浆肌钙蛋白T（cardiac troponin T,cTnT）、肌酸激酶同工酶（creatine kinase isoenzymes,CK-MB）、左室舒张末期内径（left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVEDD）、左室收缩末期内径（left ventricular end systolic diameter,LVESD）、左室射血分数（left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF）、6分钟步行距离（6 minutes walking distance,6MWD）及不良反应。结果：观察组患者临床疗效优于对照组（P<0.05）,NT-proBNP、cTnT、LVEDD和LVESD较对照组明显降低（P<0.05）,LVEF和6MWD 较对照组明显增加（P<0.05）;对照组血肌酐水平显著高于观察组（P<0.05）。结论：沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗HFrEF临床疗效好,能有效改善心功能。