Efficacy of tegoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy compared with bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized,double-blind,active-controlled study

Background

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) is recommended as the first-line empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication as it is not associated with resistance. However, few studies have investigated the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers for BQT.

Aim

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of tegoprazan-based BQT (TBMT) versus lansoprazole-based BQT (LBMT) for H. pylori eradication.

Methods

We included patients older than 18 with an H. pylori infection without a history of H. pylori eradication who visited four university-affiliated hospitals between March 2020 and December 2021. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using a rapid urease test or Giemsa staining. Patients were randomly assigned to the TBMT or LBMT group.

Results

217 subjects were randomly allocated to receive either TBMT (n = 108) or LBMT (n = 109) therapy. Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 80.0% and 77.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −8.4 to 13.7, p = 0.0124), respectively. Corresponding modified ITT rates were 90.3% and 84.5% (95% CI: −3.6 to 15.2, p = 0.0005), respectively. Per-protocol (PP) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 90.2% and 82.4% (95% CI: −2.5 to 18.2, p = 0.0003), respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the TBMT and LBMT groups (39.1% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.5211). TBMT showed higher eradication rates than that of LBMT in ITT, m-ITT, and PP analysis.

Conclusion

TBMT showed a noninferior eradication rate and similar adverse events to LBMT as a first-line eradication regimen. Our results suggest that tegoprazan might be substituted for proton pump inhibitors in H. pylori eradication regimens.     

The effects of nocturnal acid breakthrough on Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background. The effects of nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB) on Helicobacter pylori eradication are still unknown in peptic ulcer patients. The purposes of this study were to compare the effect of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid) to lansoprazole 60 mg once a day (qd) on the prevalence of NAB, and to determine whether NAB affects the eradication of H. pylori in peptic ulcer patients. Methods. Experiments were carried out in 67 patients with H. pylori‐positive peptic ulcers. They were randomized into two groups, one treated with a combination of lansoprazole 60 mg, clarithromycin 1.0 g, and amoxycillin 2.0 g once a day before breakfast (qd group), and the other, divided doses of the drugs were given before breakfast and dinner (bid group) for 2 weeks. Results. NAB occurred in 31 patients, 55.2% in qd group, and 39.5% in bid group (p = .226). H. pylori eradication was achieved in 61.3% in NAB positive group and 83.3% in NAB negative group (p = .055). The mean duration of NAB for H. pylori eradication group was 99.3 ± 22.7 min, and 293.2 ± 49.8 min for H. pylori persistence group (p < .05). The median intragastric pH of the H. pylori eradication and persistence group was 5.7 ± 0.2 and 4.2 ± 0.4, respectively (p < .05). Conclusions. Neither the morning dose and the divided dose regimen of lansoprazole affected the intragastric acidity and occurrence of the NAB. NAB did not influence H. pylori eradication in peptic ulcer patients, but the duration of NAB and total intragastric median pH were found to influence the H. pylori eradication.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric acid secretion and meal-stimulated serum gastrin in children

Background. Comparative studies of gastric acid secretion in children related to Helicobacter pylori infection are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare acid secretion and meal‐stimulated gastrin in relation to H. pylori infection among pediatric patients. Materials and Methods. Thirty‐six children aged 10–17 years (17 with H. pylori infection) undergoing diagnostic endoscopy participated in the study. Diagnoses included gastritis only (n = 23), duodenal ulcer (n = 5) and normal histology (n = 8). Gastric acid output was studied using the endoscopic gastric secretion test before and 2–3 months after H. pylori eradication. Meal‐stimulated serum gastrin response was assessed before and 12 months after eradication. Results. H. pylori gastritis was typically antrum‐predominant. Acid secretion was greater in H. pylori‐positive patients with duodenal ulcer than in gastritis‐only patients or controls [mean ± standard error (SE): 6.56 ± 1.4, 3.11 ± 0.4 and 2.65 ± 0.2 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p < .001]. Stimulated acid secretion was higher in H. pylori‐positive boys than girls (5.0 ± 0.8 vs. 2.51 ± 0.4 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p < .05). Stimulated acid secretion pre‐ and post‐H. pylori eradication was similar (5.47 ± 0.8 vs. 4.67 ± 0.9 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p = .21). Increased basal and meal‐stimulated gastrin release reversed following H. pylori eradication (e.g. basal from 134 to 46 pg/ml, p < .001 and peak from 544 to 133 pg/ml, p < .05). Conclusions. H. pylori infection in children is associated with a marked but reversible increase in meal‐stimulated serum gastrin release. Gastric acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer remains after H. pylori eradication, suggesting that the host factor plays a critical role in outcome of the infection.     

Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the 14-day triple anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study

Background: Recent studies indicate a potential role of Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of Helicobacter pylori treatment‐related side‐effects and also in improvement of eradication rate. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of S. boulardii in the prevention of side‐effects related to H. pylori eradication. The secondary aim of the study was to define the effect of S. boulardii on the eradication success of anti‐H. pylori therapy. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty‐four patients with H. pylori infection (male/female: 44/80, mean age: 48 ± 14.25 year) receiving 14 days of triple therapy (clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d., and lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d.) were randomly assigned to S. boulardii or placebo. Dyspeptic symptoms were recorded by using modified Glasgow Dyspepsia Questionnaire (GDQ). Side‐effect profile and tolerability were assessed using a symptom‐based questionnaire. H. pylori status was rechecked after 6 weeks after completion of eradication therapy. Results: H. pylori eradication rate, although higher in the treatment group, was statistically similar in treatment and control groups: 71% (44/62) versus 59.7% (37/62), respectively (p > .05). Nine (14.5%) patients in the treatment group and 19 (30.6%) patients in the placebo group experienced diarrhea (p < .05). Epigastric discomfort was more frequent in the control group [9 (14.5%) versus 27 (43.5%), respectively (p < .01)]. Diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal gas, taste disturbance, urticaria, nausea symptoms were similar in both groups. GDQ scores after treatment were significantly better for treatment group (mean ± SD, range: 1.38 ± 1.25 (0–5) vs. 2.22 ± 1.44 (0–6), respectively; p < .01). Conclusion: S. boulardii improved anti‐H. pylori antibiotherapy‐associated diarrhea, epigastric discomfort, and treatment tolerability. In addition, S. boulardii supplement decreased post‐treatment dyspepsia symptoms independent of H. pylori status. However, S. boulardii had no significant affect on the rate of H. pylori eradication.     

A Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin,Ofloxacin, Bismuth,and Omeprazole Compared With Amoxicillin,Clarithromycin, Bismuth,and Omeprazole as Second‐Line Therapy in Patients With Helicobacter pylori Infection

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach is widespread among human populations and is considered to play a major role in the pathogenesis of various diseases such as peptic ulcer, adenocarcinoma, and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stomach. To increase H. pylori eradication rate without increasing bacterial resistance, various regimens have been recommended. Commonly the association of at least two antibiotics with a proton‐pump inhibitor is used. The treatment regimens for second‐line therapy, suggested in studies from the western world may not be ideal in Iran. Aim: In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new quadruple therapy regimen and compared it with the standard second‐line treatment for H. pylori eradication. Methods: We selected 220 H. pylori positive patients, with a clear indication of eradication therapy, who did not respond to a 2 weeks treatment with metronidazole, amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth. They were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 110) were treated with azithromycin, ofloxacin, bismuth, and omeprazole and group B (n = 110) with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, bismuth, and omeprazole for 2 weeks. Four weeks after the end of treatment, urea breath test was performed for all subjects to confirm eradication. Results: In intention‐to‐treat analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 77.3% (85/110) and 64.5% (71/110) respectively (p = .027). In per‐protocol analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 86.7 and 74.7%, respectively (p = .026). The incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly so, in group A than group B (3.5 vs 4.3%). No major adverse events occurred in both groups. Conclusion: Two weeks of treatment with ofloxacin, azithromycin, omeprazole, and bismuth is an effective and safe regimen for H. pylori eradication as second‐line therapy.     

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Prevents Metachronous Gastric Neoplasms after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Dysplasia

Purpose

There is insufficient data about the role of eradication of H. pylori after endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric dysplasia. The aim was to investigate the benefit of H. pylori eradication after ER in patients with gastric dysplasia to prevent metachronous gastric neoplasms.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1872 patients who underwent ER of gastric dysplasia. We excluded patients with a follow-up period of <2 years or who had not undergone tests for active H. pylori infection. A total of 282 patients were enrolled. The patients were categorized into those without active H. pylori infection (H. pylori-negative group, n = 124), those who successfully underwent H. pylori eradication (eradicated group, n = 122), and those who failed or did not undergo H. pylori eradication (persistent group, n = 36).

Results

Metachronous recurrence was diagnosed in 36 patients, including 19 in the H. pylori-negative group, 10 in the eradicated group, and 7 in the persistent group. The cumulative incidence of metachronous recurrence was significantly lower in the H. pylori-eradicated group in comparison with either of the H. pylori-persistent (non-eradicated or failed) groups (p = 0.039). Similarly, the incidence of metachronous recurrence was significantly lower in the H. pylori-eradicated group compared with the H. pylori-negative group (p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Successful H. pylori eradication may reduce the development of metachronous gastric neoplasms after ER in patients with gastric dysplasia.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in children in Vietnam in relation to antibiotic resistance

Background: Low Helicobacter pylori eradication rates are common in pediatric trials especially in developing countries. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of antibiotic resistance, drug dosage, and administration frequency on treatment outcome for children in Vietnam. Materials and Methods: Antibiotics resistance of H. pylori was analyzed by the Etest in 222 pretreatment isolates from children 3–15 years of age who were originally recruited in a randomized trial with two treatment regiments: lansoprazole with amoxicillin and either clarithromycin (LAC) or metronidazole (LAM) in two weight groups with once‐ or twice‐daily administration. The study design was an observational study embedded in a randomized trial. Results: The overall resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin was 50.9%, 65.3%, and 0.5%, respectively. In LAC, eradication was linked to the strains being susceptible to clarithromycin (78.2% vs 29.3%, p = .0001). Twice‐daily dosage of proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) and clarithromycin was more effective for eradication than once‐daily dosage for resistant strains (50.0% vs 14.7%, p = .004) and tended to be so also for sensitive strains (87.5% vs 65.2%, p = .051). Exact antibiotic dose per body weight resulted in more eradication for resistant strains (45.3% vs 8.0%, p = .006). These differences were less pronounced for the LAM regimen, with twice‐daily PPI versus once daily for resistant strains resulting in 69.2% and 50.0% eradication (p = .096), respectively. Conclusions: Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin resistance was unexpectedly high in young children in Vietnam. Clarithromycin resistance was an important cause for eradication treatment failure. Twice‐daily administration and exact antibiotic dosing resulted in more eradicated infections when the strains were antibiotic resistant, which has implications for the study design in pediatric H. pylori eradication trials.     

Quantitative PCR of string-test collected gastric material: A feasible approach to detect Helicobacter pylori and its resistance against clarithromycin and levofloxacin for susceptibility-guided therapy

Background

As the reduced eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), we introduced string-test and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for susceptibility-guided therapy innovatively. The practicality of the string test was evaluated.

Methods

It was an open-label, non-randomized, parallel, single-center study, in which subjects tested by ¹³C- urea breath test (UBT) and string-qPCR were enrolled. Based on the results of string-qPCR, we calculated clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance rates and gave ¹³C-UBT positive patients 14 days susceptibility-guided bismuth quadruple therapy. In the empirical therapy group, we retrospectively analyzed the treatment results of ¹³C-UBT positive patients also treated with bismuth quadruple at Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital from January 2021 to May 2022. The eradication rate was compared between susceptibility-guided therapy and empirical therapy groups.

Results

The diagnosis of H. pylori infection using the string-qPCR had an overall concordance rate of 95.9% with the ¹³C-UBT results. Based on the results of string-qPCR, the clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance rates were 26.1% and 31.8%, respectively. The patients who were given 14 days susceptibility-guided bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved a high H. pylori eradication rate of 91.8%. Retrospective analysis of patient treatment data from January 2021 to May 2022 available in the hospital database revealed an overall success rate of 82.3% for those who received empirical bismuth-based quadruple therapies, which is marginally significantly lower than that of the string-qPCR susceptibility-guided group (p = 0.084).

Conclusion

The high treatment success rate of 91.8% indicates that the string-qPCR test is a valuable and feasible approach for clinical practice to help improve H. pylori treatment success rate.     

Macrolide use in the previous years is associated with failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with clarithromycin‐containing regimens

Background

There is some evidence that prior use of macrolide antibiotics is a useful predictor of the likelihood of standard triple therapy failure in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In this study, we have evaluated whether previous intake of macrolides correlates with failure to eradicate H. pylori using two different first‐line clarithromycin‐containing regimens.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective study of 212 patients with H. pylori infection treated with one of two first‐line clarithromycin‐containing regimens: 108 patients treated with triple therapy for 10 days and 104 patients treated with concomitant therapy for 10 days. The intake of macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, and other macrolides) prior to the eradication therapy was obtained from the electronic medical record, which contains information regarding all the medication prescribed to the patients since the year 2004.

Results

One hundred of 212 patients (47.2%) had received at least one treatment with macrolides during the years prior to the eradication therapy. H. pylori eradication rates were significantly lower in patients with previous use compared to patients without previous use of macrolides, both with triple therapy (60.8% vs 92.9%; P < .0001) and with concomitant therapy (85.7% vs 98.2%; P = .024).

Conclusions

Previous use of macrolides correlates with a low H. pylori eradication rate with triple and concomitant clarithromycin‐containing regimens. In addition, our study shows that in patients without previous use of macrolides, triple therapy achieves per‐protocol eradication rates over 90%.     

Quadruple therapy with vonoprazan 20 mg daily as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: A single-center,open-label,noninferiority, randomized controlled trial

Background

Although vonoprazan has been proven to be a highly potent drug for Helicobacter pylori eradication, there have been no randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of regimens containing vonoprazan 20 mg daily with alternative standard strategies. We aimed to assess the efficacy, tolerance, and cost-effectiveness of quadruple therapy with vonoprazan 20 mg daily as a first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a single-center, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled study in Zhejiang, China. Treatment-naive H. pylori-positive participants (n = 234) were randomly assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: vonoprazan 20 mg daily with amoxicillin 1000 mg, furazolidone 100 mg and colloidal bismuth 200 mg each given twice a day for 10 days (V10) or 14 days (V14), or esomeprazole 20 mg with amoxicillin 1000 mg, furazolidone 100 mg and colloidal bismuth 200 mg each given twice a day for 14 days (E14). The primary endpoint was the eradication rates in each group. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and compliance.

Results

The eradication rates in the V10, V14 and E14 groups were 96.2% (89.2–99.2%), 94.9% (87.4–98.6%), and 93.6% (85.7–97.9%) in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 98.6% (92.7–100.0%), 97.4% (90.8–99.7%), and 94.8% (87.2–98.6%) in the per-protocol analysis, respectively. Quadruple therapy with vonoprazan 20 mg daily was noninferior to the esomeprazole-based regimen (Farrington and Manning test: margin 10%, significance level 2.5%). The adverse event rates were 12.8% versus 3.8% versus 6.4% in the V10, V14, and E14 groups, respectively. All regimens were well tolerated without significant differences (p = 0.096). The cost-effectiveness ratio was 1.32, 1.88, and 3.06 for the V10, V14, and E14 groups in the intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. (NCT04907747).

Conclusions

Vonoprazan (20 mg daily) was as effective as esomeprazole (20 mg twice a day) in quadruple therapies for the eradication of H. pylori, was more economical, and was well tolerated. In addition, the 10-day regimen of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) was comparable to the 14-day regimen.     

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy May Facilitate Gastric Ulcer Healing After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background and Aim: It remains unclear whether Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy affects the healing rate of iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for gastric tumors. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on gastric ulcer healing after EMR. Methods: After EMR, patients were randomly assigned to either the H. pylori eradication group (Hp group) (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, twice a day for 7 days) or the noneradication group (proton pump inhibitor, PPI group) (lansoprazole 30 mg, twice a day for 7 days). Four weeks after EMR, the ulcer stages and size were compared between the two groups. Moreover, ulcer‐related symptoms, bleeding rates, adverse effects, and drug compliance were compared. Results: A total of 64 patients were enrolled. Of these, 17 patients were excluded from the study. The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. Four weeks after EMR, the two groups did not differ with respect to ulcer stage (p = .475) or ulcer‐related symptoms (p = .399). However, the ulcer reduction ratio was significantly higher in the Hp group (0.028 ± 0.024 vs. 0.065 ± 0.055, p < .05). No differences were observed between the two groups with regard to drug compliance, adverse drug event rates, or bleeding rates. Conclusions: Our results suggest that H. pylori eradication therapy might improve the ulcer healing rate after EMR.     

The role of Helicobacter pylori in patients with hypothyroidism in whom could not be achieved normal thyrotropin levels despite treatment with high doses of thyroxine

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection is a most frequent cause of chronic gastritis. H. pylori may decrease absorption of oral thyroxine by decreasing gastric acid secretion in the stomach. In this study, we aimed to investigate the change in thyroid function tests of the cases after H. pylori eradication who were not responding to high doses of thyroxine treatment before H. pylori eradication. Methods: Hypothyroid cases who were not responding to high doses of thyroxine among the ones presented to Endocrinology and Gastroenterohepatology Clinics of Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital between 2009 and 2010 were included in the study. Thyroid function tests were performed two times in all cases before and after H. pylori eradication. Duodenal, antral and corporal biopsies, and jejunal aspirates and biopsies were taken during upper gastrointestinal system endoscopies performed in all patients. Cases without intestinal pathology were included in the study. Results: Serum thyrotropin (TSH), free T3, and free T4 values before H. pylori eradication were 30.5 ± 28.8 IU/mL, 2.64 ± 0.56 pg/mL, and 0.92 ± 0.32 ng/mL, respectively, and after eradication were found to be 4.2 ± 10.6 IU/mL, 3.02 ± 0.61 pg/mL, and 1.3 ± 0.34 ng/mL, respectively (p values <.001, .002, and <.001, respectively). After H. pylori eradication treatment, TSH decreased in all of the cases, factitious thyrotoxicosis developed in % 21 of these cases. Conclusion: In hypothyroid cases, H. pylori gastritis may be responsible for an inadequate response to the treatment. H. pylori eradication in the cases receiving high doses of thyroxine has a risk for thyrotoxicosis.     

Randomized trial on 14 versus 7 days of esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin for second-line or rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin has been proven effective in first‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aim: To explore 1, the value of triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin in second‐line or rescue treatment of Caucasian patients and 2, the impact of treatment duration on eradication success. Methods: H. pylori‐infected patients with at least one previous treatment failure were randomized to oral esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., moxifloxacin 400 mg o.d., and amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d. for either 7 (EMA‐7) or 14 days (EMA‐14). Eradication was confirmed by 13C urea breath test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in all patients at baseline and in patients who failed treatment. Results: Eighty patients were randomized, and 60% had ≥2 previous treatment failures. Pretreatment resistance against clarithromycin and metronidazole was found in 70.5 and 61.5% of cases, respectively. The intention‐to‐treat eradication rate was significantly higher after EMA‐14 compared with EMA‐7 (95.0 vs 78.9%, p = .036). No independent risk factor for treatment failure could be identified. There were no serious adverse events. Five of the EMA‐14 patients (12.5%) compared with none of the EMA‐7 patients discontinued prematurely because of adverse events (p = .031). Post‐treatment resistance against moxifloxacin was found in one of seven patients with isolated organisms (14.3%). Conclusion: Second‐line/rescue H. pylori eradication therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin is very effective and well tolerated. Fourteen days of treatment significantly increase the eradication rate but also the rate of adverse events.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric precancerous lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The question of whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) can reverse gastric precancerous lesions, including intestinal metaplasia, remains uncertain, leading to ongoing debate. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of Hp eradication on gastric precancerous lesions.

Materials and Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus database, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to April 2023 for studies that explored the impact of Hp eradication on gastric precancerous lesions. Risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were selected as the effect size. We used the random-effects model to assess pooled data. We also performed quality assessments, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses.

Results

Fifteen studies were included. Compared with placebo, Hp eradication could significantly prevent the progression of gastric precancerous lesions (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81–0.94, p < 0.01) and reverse them (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.17–1.50, p < 0.01). Then, specific precancerous lesions were further explored. The progression of intestinal metaplasia was significantly prevented by Hp eradication compared to placebo or no treatment (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.94, p < 0.01). Moreover, compared with placebo or no treatment, Hp eradication also improved chronic atrophic gastritis (RR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.30–2.61, p < 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15–1.73, p < 0.01). However, in terms of preventing dysplasia progression (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.37–2.00) and improving dysplasia (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.47–1.70), Hp eradication had no advantage compared to placebo or no treatment.

Conclusions

Hp eradication therapy could prevent the progression of gastric precancerous lesions and reverse them. Notably, intestinal metaplasia can be reversed, but this may only be appropriate for patients with epigenetic alterations and milder lesions.     

Clarithromycin–Amoxycillin‐Containing Triple Therapy: A Valid Empirical First‐Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Hong Kong?

Background: Recent studies have suggested the eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori infection with standard amoxycillin–clarithromycin‐containing triple therapy as first‐line treatment have fallen below 80%. Levofloxacin‐containing triple therapy was proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the standard 7‐day clarithromycin‐containing triple therapy against the 7‐day levofloxacin‐containing triple therapy, and to assess whether the classical triple therapy is still valid as empirical first‐line treatment for H. pylori infection in Hong Kong. Methods: Three hundred consecutive H. pylori‐positive patients were randomized to receive either 1 week of EAL (esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and levofloxacin 500 mg daily) or EAC (esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d.). H. pylori status was rechecked by ¹³C‐urea breath test 6 weeks after treatment. Patients who failed either of the first‐line eradication therapy were invited to undergo H. pylori susceptibility testing. Results: H. pylori eradication was achieved in 128 of 150 (85.3%) patients in EAL and 139 of 150 (92.7%) patients in EAC groups, respectively (p = .043), for both intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis. More patients in the clarithromycin‐ than the levofloxacin‐containing therapy group developed side effects from the medication (21.3% vs 13.3%, p = .060). Nine patients (six from the EAL group and three from the EAC group) who failed their corresponding eradication therapy returned for susceptibility testing. All nine isolates were highly resistant to levofloxacin (minimum inhibitory concentration or MIC > 32 μg/mL), whereas only two of the six isolates from the EAL group were resistant to clarithromycin (MIC > 0.5 μg/mL). Conclusions: The standard 7‐day clarithromycin‐containing triple therapy is still valid as the most effective empirical first‐line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection in Hong Kong, as prevalence of primary resistance of H. pylori to amoxycillin and clarithromycin remains low. Patients who failed their empirical first‐line eradication therapy should undergo H. pylori susceptibility testing to guide further treatment.     

High Efficacy of 14‐Day Triple Therapy‐Based,Bismuth‐Containing Quadruple Therapy for Initial Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: The success rate of currently recommended 7‐day triple therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin has fallen into the unacceptable range. It is urgent to look for a new strategy to treat the infection of Helicobacter pylori. Aims: To observe the efficacy of triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori treatment. Methods: A total of 160 patients with functional dyspepsia who were Hp+ were randomly assigned into two groups. Regimen: Omeprazole 20 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Clarithromycin 500 mg and Bismuth Potassium Citrate 220 mg, twice a day. Eighty patients received 7‐day quadruple therapy and 80 patients received the same therapy for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin of clinical isolates were determined by the twofold agar dilution method. Results: Fourteen‐day therapy led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 7‐day therapy in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (93.7 vs 80.0%; p = .01), and the per‐protocol analysis (97.4 vs 82.0%; p = .0016). The H. pylori resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 42.1, 18.0 and 0%. Fourteen‐day therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusions: Addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and decrease the bacterial load. Fourteen‐day triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy achieved ITT success rate 93% and could be recommended as the first line eradication regimen.     

Helicobacter pylori‐Associated Chronic Gastritis and Unexplained Iron Deficiency Anemia: a Reliable Association?

Background and aim. About 35% of iron deficiency anemia cases remain unexplained after a gastrointestinal evaluation. An association between Helicobacter pylori and iron malabsorption has been suggested. The aim of this study was to determine whether H. pylori‐associated chronic gastritis is linked to unexplained iron deficiency anemia in adults. Methods. From 1996 to 2001, we identified 105 patients with unexplained iron deficiency anemia after upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, small bowel radiographic examination and duodenal biopsies. Two biopsies were obtained from the gastric antrum and two from the corpus of each patient. Gastritis status was described according to the Sydney System and H. pylori infection was assessed by an immunohistochemical test on biopsy specimens. This group was compared to a control group matched for sex and age. Results. There were 76 women and 29 men (mean age 57.4 ± 21.4 years) examined in the study. A H. pylori‐associated chronic gastritis was identified in 63 cases (60%) vs. 45 cases (43%) cases in the control group (p < .01). Atrophic gastritis was significantly associated with iron deficiency anemia compared with the control group [16 (15%) vs. 6 (6%); p < .03]. In the unexplained iron deficiency anemia group, (1) patients with chronic gastritis were significantly younger (52 ± 22 vs. 64 ± 20 years; p < .005), and (2) chronic gastritis was not linked to sex [sex ratio (male/female): 0.5 vs. 0.34, p = .34]. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was similar between premenopausal and postmenopausal women [28 (27%) vs. 26 (25%); p = .7] with iron deficiency anemia. Conclusion. H. pylori infection and chronic gastritis, especially atrophic gastritis, are significantly associated with unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Relationships between H. pylori‐associated chronic gastritis and unexplained iron deficiency anemia should be considered.     

Anti‐Helicobacter pylori therapy in localized gastric mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: A prospective,nationwide, multicenter study in Japan

Background

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy was approved in Japan for the first‐line, standard treatment of H. pylori‐positive gastric mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Although several retrospective studies or small‐scale single‐center studies have been reported, a prospective, large‐scale, nationwide, multicenter study has not been reported from Japan.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a prospective, nationwide, multicenter study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of rabeprazole‐based triple H. pylori eradication therapy for patients with localized gastric MALT lymphoma in practice‐based clinical trial. A total of 108 H. pylori‐positive patients with stage I/II₁ gastric MALT lymphoma underwent H. pylori eradication therapy. The primary endpoints were complete remission (CR) rate and the rate of transfer to secondary treatment. The secondary endpoints were CR maintenance duration and overall survival (OS).

Results

CR of lymphoma was achieved in 84 of 97 patients (86.6%), during the period 2.0‐44.7 months (median, 5.3 months) after starting H. pylori eradication treatment. CR was maintained in 77 of 81 patients (95.1%) for 0.4‐53.2 months (median, 33.1 months). Secondary treatments (radiotherapy, rituximab, or gastrectomy) for gastric MALT lymphoma were needed in 10 of the 97 patients (10.31%). During follow‐up, OS rate was 96.9% (94/97) and the causes of 3 deaths were not related to lymphoma.

Conclusions

Rabeprazole‐based H. pylori eradication therapy demonstrated a high CR rate, long CR maintenance, and a good OS for patients with localized gastric MALT lymphoma in this prospective, practice‐based, multicenter study.     

A real-world exploratory study on the feasibility of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies

Background

The treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a challenge for those who cannot use amoxicillin.

Objective

To evaluate the eradication rate and adverse effects of vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy as first-line and rescue treatment regimens used in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies.

Design

Patients enrolled were those who were H. pylori-positive with selected conditions: (1) allergic to penicillin, either naïve to treatment or had failed before; or (2) failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies. All enrolled patients accepted 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy (VT dual therapy) as follows: vonoprazan (20 mg b.i.d.) and tetracycline (500 mg t.i.d. [body weight < 70 kg] or 500 mg q.i.d. [body weight ≥ 70 kg]). H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C-urease breath test 6 weeks after treatment. All adverse effects were recorded. Some patients underwent bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Results

A total of 62 patients were enrolled; 18 of them received VT dual therapy as first-line treatment, 44 patients received VT dual therapy as rescue treatment. Overall, 58 of 62 patients achieved successful eradication (93.5%), while all involved (100%,18/18) succeeded in the first-line treatment group and 40 cases (90.9%, 40/44) succeeded in the rescue treatment group. Sixty-one (61/62, 98.4%) patients completed the whole course of treatment. Adverse events occurred in 6 patients (6/62, 9.7%), while one patient quit because of skin rash. All adverse effects were mild and relieved spontaneously after H. pylori treatment. Five patients achieved successful H. pylori culture, and all strains isolated were sensitive to tetracycline.

Conclusions

For the treatment of H. pylori infection in special populations with penicillin allergy or failed in previous amoxicillin-containing therapies, a 14-day vonoprazan and tetracycline dual therapy was effective and safe as first-line and rescue treatment in our study. Further study is warranted to verify its efficacy, especially for those who cannot use amoxicillin.     

Sequential metronidazole-furazolidone or clarithromycin-furazolidone compared to clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background: Furazolidone is a much cheaper drug with a very low resistance against Helicobacter pylori compared to clarithromycin. We aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of a sequential furazolidone‐based regimen versus clarithromycin‐based therapy in H. pylori eradication for ulcer disease. Materials: Patients with proven peptic ulcer or duodenitis were randomized into three groups: OAB‐M‐F; metronidazole (M) (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days, followed by furazolidone (F) (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days; OAC‐P; clarithromycin (C) (500 mg bid) for 10 days; and OAB‐C‐F; clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days and furazolidone (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days. All groups received omeprazole (O) (20 mg bid) and amoxicillin (A) (1 g bid). Groups OAB‐M‐F and OAB‐C‐F were also given bismuth subcitrate (B) (240 mg bid), whereas a placebo (P) was given to group OAC‐P. Adverse events were scored and recorded. Two months after treatment, a C¹³‐urea breath test was performed. Results: Three hundred and ten patients were enrolled and 92 (OAB‐M‐F), 95 (OAC‐P), and 98 (OAB‐C‐F) completed the study. The intention‐to‐treat eradication rates were 78.5% (95% CI = 69–85), 81.1% (95% CI = 73–88), and 82% (95% CI = 74–89), and per‐protocol eradication rates were 91.3% (95% CI = 83–96), 90.4% (95% CI = 82–95), and 88.7% (95% CI = 81–94), for group OAB‐M‐F, OAC‐P, and OAB‐C‐F, respectively. Eradication rate differences did not reach statistical significance. The most common adverse event, bad taste, occurred in all groups, but more frequently in groups OAC‐P (34%) and OAB‐C‐F (32%), than OAB‐M‐F (14%) (p < .05). Adverse symptoms score were 0.88 ± 2.05 in group OAB‐M‐F, 1.15 ± 1.40 in group OAC‐P, and 1.87 ± 1.62 in group OAB‐C‐F. Conclusion: Furazolidone can replace clarithromycin in H. pylori eradication regimens because of lack of development of resistance and very low cost.