Analysis of ER stress in developing rice endosperm accumulating β‐amyloid peptide

The common neurodegenerative disorder known as Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by cerebral neuritic plaques of amyloid β (Aβ) peptide. Plaque formation is related to the highly aggregative property of this peptide, because it polymerizes to form insoluble plaques or fibrils causing neurotoxicity. Here, we expressed Aβ peptide as a new causing agent to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress to study ER stress occurred in plant. When the dimer of Aβ_1–42 peptide was expressed in maturing seed under the control of the 2.3‐kb glutelin GluB‐1 promoter containing its signal peptide, a maximum of about 8 μg peptide per grain accumulated and was deposited at the periphery of distorted ER‐derived PB‐I protein bodies. Synthesis of Aβ peptide in the ER lumen severely inhibited the synthesis and deposition of seed storage proteins, resulting in the generation of many small and abnormally appearing PB bodies. This ultrastructural change was accounted for by ER stress leading to the accumulation of aggregated Aβ peptide in the ER lumen and a coordinated increase in ER‐resident molecular chaperones such as BiPs and PDIs in Aβ‐expressing plants. Microarray analysis also confirmed that expression of several BiPs, PDIs and OsbZIP60 containing putative transmembrane domains was affected by the ER stress response. Aβ‐expressing transgenic rice kernels exhibited an opaque and shrunken phenotype. When grain phenotype and expression levels were compared among transgenic rice grains expressing several different recombinant peptides, such detrimental effects on grain phenotype were correlated with the expressed peptide causing ER stress rather than expression levels.     

Identification and functional study of the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

In many eukaryotes, endoplasmic reticulum (ER ) stress activates the unfolded protein response (UPR ) via the transmembrane endoribonuclease IRE 1 to maintain ER homeostasis. The ER stress response in microalgae has not been studied in detail. Here, we identified Chlamydomonas reinhardtii IRE 1 (CrIRE 1 ) and characterized two independent knock‐down alleles of this gene. CrIRE 1 is similar to IRE 1s identified in budding yeast, plants, and humans, in terms of conserved domains, but differs in having the tandem zinc‐finger domain at the C terminus. CrIRE 1 was highly induced under ER stress conditions, and the expression of a chimeric protein consisting of the luminal N‐terminal region of CrIRE 1 fused to the cytosolic C‐terminal region of yeast Ire1p rescued the yeast ?ire1 mutant. Both allelic ire1 knock‐down mutants ire1‐1 and ire1‐2 were much more sensitive than their parental strain CC ‐4533 to the ER stress inducers tunicamycin, dithiothreitol and brefeldin A. Treatment with a low concentration of tunicamycin resulted in growth arrest and cytolysis in ire1 mutants, but not in CC ‐4533 cells. Furthermore, in the mutants, ER stress marker gene expression was reduced, and reactive oxygen species (ROS ) marker gene expression was increased. The survival of ire1 mutants treated with tunicamycin improved in the presence of the ROS scavenger glutathione, suggesting that ire1 mutants failed to maintain ROS levels under ER stress. Together, these results indicate that CrIRE 1 functions as an important component of the ER stress response in Chlamydomonas, and suggest that the ER stress sensor IRE 1 is highly conserved during the evolutionary history.     

Inter‐regulation of the unfolded protein response and auxin signaling

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a signaling network triggered by overload of protein‐folding demand in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a condition termed ER stress. The UPR is critical for growth and development; nonetheless, connections between the UPR and other cellular regulatory processes remain largely unknown. Here, we identify a link between the UPR and the phytohormone auxin, a master regulator of plant physiology. We show that ER stress triggers down‐regulation of auxin receptors and transporters in Arabidopsis thaliana. We also demonstrate that an Arabidopsis mutant of a conserved ER stress sensor IRE1 exhibits defects in the auxin response and levels. These data not only support that the plant IRE1 is required for auxin homeostasis, they also reveal a species‐specific feature of IRE1 in multicellular eukaryotes. Furthermore, by establishing that UPR activation is reduced in mutants of ER‐localized auxin transporters, including PIN5, we define a long‐neglected biological significance of ER‐based auxin regulation. We further examine the functional relationship of IRE1 and PIN5 by showing that an ire1 pin5 triple mutant enhances defects of UPR activation and auxin homeostasis in ire1 or pin5. Our results imply that the plant UPR has evolved a hormone‐dependent strategy for coordinating ER function with physiological processes.     

Rice OsPAD4 functions differently from Arabidopsis AtPAD4 in host‐pathogen interactions

The extensively studied Arabidopsis phytoalexin deficient 4 (AtPAD4) gene plays an important role in Arabidopsis disease resistance; however, the function of its sequence ortholog in rice is unknown. Here, we show that rice OsPAD4 appears not to be the functional ortholog of AtPAD4 in host‐pathogen interactions, and that the OsPAD4 encodes a plasma membrane protein but that AtPAD4 encodes a cytoplasmic and nuclear protein. Suppression of OsPAD4 by RNA interference (RNAi) increased rice susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), which causes bacteria blight disease in local tissue. OsPAD4‐RNAi plants also show compromised wound‐induced systemic resistance to Xoo. The increased susceptibility to Xoo was associated with reduced accumulation of jasmonic acid (JA) and phytoalexin momilactone A (MOA). Exogenous application of JA complemented the phenotype of OsPAD4‐RNAi plants in response to Xoo. The following results suggest that OsPAD4 functions differently than AtPAD4 in response to pathogen infection. First, OsPAD4 plays an important role in wound‐induced systemic resistance, whereas AtPAD4 mediates systemic acquired resistance. Second, OsPAD4‐involved defense signaling against Xoo is JA‐dependent, but AtPAD4‐involved defense signaling against biotrophic pathogens is salicylic acid‐dependent. Finally, OsPAD4 is required for the accumulation of terpenoid‐type phytoalexin MOA in rice‐bacterium interactions, but AtPAD4‐mediated resistance is associated with the accumulation of indole‐type phytoalexin camalexin.