水稻叶片Rubisco 活化酶表达的昼夜变化

在 48h的自然光照、连续光照和连续黑暗处理下 ,水稻幼苗rcamRNA的含量均表现出昼夜节奏特性 ,其中以自然光周期中变化最为明显。在光暗交替的条件下 ,RCA含量虽也表现出明显的昼夜变化 ,但连续黑暗处理其含量持续下降 ,连续光照则其含量先上升然后下降 ,说明它不发生节昼现象。这些结果表明RCA表达在转录和翻译水平上的调控机制不同 ,转录既由光暗交替控制又受内生节奏调节 ,而翻译则更大程度上由光调节     

光和糖对水稻Rubisco活化酶基因表达的影响

水稻黄化苗在光照2h内其Rubisco。活化酶的mRNA和蛋白量明显增加,然后维持在相对稳定的水平。光对水稻Rubisco活化酶的基因表达的诱导作用主要在转录水平上。Rubisco活化酶主要在绿叶中表达,这与Rubisco基因表达的器官特异性完全一致。用等渗葡萄糖喂养成熟的水稻叶片1h,促使水稻Rubisco大、小亚基和Rubisco活化酶可翻译mRNA含量下降。同样蔗糖对Rubisco小亚基和Rubisco活化酶的表达也有抑制,其作用弱于葡萄糖。     

水稻抽穗后剑叶衰老过程中光合关键酶的基因表达

协优 930 8、培矮 6 4s/ 9311和汕优 6 3三个超级高产水稻品种抽穗后 ,剑叶中光合速率减小、叶绿素含量下降、SOD活力降低和MDA含量上升的幅度不同 ,显示它们开花结实过程中叶片衰老的速度不同 ,以汕优 6 3衰老最快 ,协优 930 8最慢 ,培矮 6 4s/ 9311居中。Northern杂交和免疫定量研究表明 ,汕优 6 3和培矮6 4s/ 9311剑叶rbcS(Rubisco小亚基基因 )和rca(Ru bisco活化酶基因 )mRNA的表达随抽穗后天数的增加而下降 ,而协优 930 8在抽穗后第 10天才开始下降 ;Rubisco和Rubisco活化酶蛋白含量的下降趋势与rbcS和rcamRNA的变化趋势相似。因此 ,水稻抽穗后剑叶衰老过程中光合能力的下降与光合关键酶基因(rbcS和rca)表达下降密切相关     

Antisense inhibition of Rubisco activase increases Rubisco content and alters the proportion of Rubisco activase in stroma and thylakoids in chloroplasts of rice leaves

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activase (RCA) is a nuclear-encoded chloroplast protein that modifies the conformation of Rubisco, releases inhibitors from active sites, and increases enzymatic activity. It appears to have other functions, e.g. in gibberellin signalling and as a molecular chaperone, which are related to its distribution within the chloroplast. The aim of this research was to resolve uncertainty about the localization of RCA, and to determine whether the distributions of Rubisco and RCA were altered when RCA content was reduced. The monocotyledon, Oryza sativa was used as a model species. METHODS: Gas exchange and Rubisco were measured, and the sub-cellular locations of Rubisco and RCA were determined using immunogold-labelling electron microscopy, in wild-type and antisense rca rice plants. KEY RESULTS: In antisense rca plants, net photosynthetic rate and the initial Rubisco activity decreased much less than RCA content. Immunocytolocalization showed that Rubisco in wild-type and antisense plants was localized in the stroma of chloroplasts. However, the amount of Rubisco in the antisense rca plants was greater than in the wild-type plants. RCA was detected in both the chloroplast stroma and in the thylakoid membranes of wild-type plants. The percentage of RCA labelling in the thylakoid membrane was shown to be substantially decreased, while the fraction in the stroma was increased, by the antisense rca treatment. CONCLUSIONS: From the changes in RCA distribution and alterations in Rubisco activity, RCA in the stroma of the chloroplast probably contributes to the activation of Rubisco, and RCA in thylakoids compensates for the reduction of RCA in the stroma, allowing steady-state photosynthesis to be maintained when RCA is depleted. RCA may also have a second role in protecting membranes against environmental stresses as a chaperone.