In the beginning: Generating neural crest cell diversity

Neural crest cells (NCCs) are migratory cells that delaminate from the neural tube early in development and then disseminate throughout the embryo to give rise to a wide variety of cell types that are key to the vertebrate body plan. During their journey from the neural tube to their peripheral targets, NCCs progressively differentiate, raising the question of when the fate of an individual NCC is sealed. One hypothesis suggests that the fate of a NCC is specified by target-derived signals emanating from the environment they migrate through, while another hypothesis proposes that NCCs are already specified to differentiate along select lineages at the time they are born in the neural tube, with environmental signals helping them to realize their prespecified fate potential. Alternatively, both mechanisms may cooperate to drive NCC diversity. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of prespecification during trunk NCC development.Key words: neural crest cell, multipotent, prespecification, neuropilin, semaphorin, migration, cell fate     

Regulation of neural crest cell populations: occurrence, distribution and underlying mechanisms

Regulation is a significant developmental event because successful cell proliferation and migration are critical to shaping young embryos. Regulation -- the replacement of undifferentiated embryonic cells by other cells in response to signals received from the environment -- is distinct from wound healing and regeneration. Investigations on regulation of neural crest cells span all vertebrates and have revealed that regulative ability varies both among classes (even species), and spatially and temporally within individuals. In general, there is greatest regulation for cranial neural crest cells, less for trunk, and virtually none forcardiac. Regulation also appears to be more complete at early embryonic stages. Fate-mapping studies have demonstrated that large regions of neural crest cells must be removed to generate missing or morphologically reduced structures. Recent studies reveal that less extensive neural crest cell extirpations result in normal morphology of cartilaginous and neuronal elements in the head, and normal development of pigmentation in the trunk. Ablation of cardiac neural crest cells frequently generates abnormalities of the heart, great vessels and parasympathetic nerve innervation. Decreased cell death, increased division, change in fate and altered migration are possible cellular mechanisms of regulation. In mostcases, the specific mechanisms of regulation are unknown, but a major premise underlying regulation is that cell potential is greater than cell fate. This concept was born from studies which demonstrated that some cells were able to express alternative fates if transplanted to a new environment. Among the potential cellular mechanisms for regulation, cell migration has received the most attention. Following ablation of neural crest cells, replacement neural crest cells migrate into gaps, most frequently from anterior/posterior locations. Cells from surrounding epidermal and neural ectoderm may have limited regulative ability, while compensation by cells from the ventral neural tube has been demonstrated to an even lesser extent. Regulation by such non-crest cells would require their transformation into neural crest cells. The potential for regulation of neural crest by placodal cells supports a closer relationship between neural crest and placodal ectoderm than previously recognized. Decreased cell death has been discussed primarily with reference to (1) cranial ganglia that have dual contributions from neural crest and placodal cells and (2) programmed cell death in rhombomeres three and five. Increased cell division in response to neural crest ablation is likely more common than has been reported, but this mechanism is difficult to interpret without a 3-D context for viewing how patterns of division differ from normal. Lastly, changes in cell fate may be the driving factor in regulation of embryonic cells. It has been repeatedly demonstrated thatcell potential is greaterthan cell fate. Once reliable mechanisms for assessing cell potential are established, we may find that fates are commonly altered in response to environmental signals. Regulation is therefore significant both as a basic developmental mechanism and as a mechanism for evolutionary change. The more labile the fate of embryonic cells, the more potential there is for maintaining existing characters and for generating new ones. According to Ettensohn (1992, p. 50), further analysis of such systems might . With regard to the neural crest, studies on regulation of this vital population of cells provide insight to the origin of the neural crest, to embryonic repair, and to the source of many craniofacial malformations, heart and other embryonic defects. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Cell lineage analysis in neural crest ontogeny

The neural crest is a transitory and pluripotent structure of the vertebrate embryo composed of cells endowed with developmentally regulated migratory properties. We review here a series of studies carried out both in vivo and in vitro on the ontogeny of the neural crest in the avian embryo. Through in vivo studies we established the fate map of the neural crest along the neuraxis prior to the onset of the migration and we demonstrated the crucial role played by the tissue environment in which the crest cells migrate in determining their fate. Moreover, the pathways of neural crest cell migration could also be traced by the quail-chick marker system and the use of the HNK1/NC1 monoclonal antibody (Mab). A large series of clonal cultures of isolated neural crest cells showed that, at migration time, most crest cells are pluripotent. Some, however, are already committed to a particular pathway of differentiation. The differentiation capacities of the pluripotent progenitors are highly variable from one to the other cell. Rare totipotent progenitors able to give rise to representatives of all the phenotypes (neuronal, glial, melanocytic, and mesectodermal) encountered in neural crest derivatives were also found. As a whole we propose a model according to which totipotent neural crest cells become progressively restricted (according to a stochastic rather than a sequentially ordered mechanism) in their potentialities, while they actively divide during the migration process. At the sites of gangliogenesis, selective forces allow only certain crest cells potentialities to be expressed in each type of peripheral nervous system (PNS) ganglia. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Dissimilar regulation of cell differentiation in mesencephalic (cranial) and sacral (trunk) neural crest cells in vitro

During development neural crest cells give rise to a wide variety of specialized cell types in response to cytokines from surrounding tissues. Depending on the cranial-caudal level of their origin, different populations of neural crest cells exhibit differential competence to respond to these signals as exemplified by the unique ability of cranial neural crest to form skeletal cell types. We show that in addition to differences in whether they respond to particular signals, cranial neural crest cells differ dramatically from the trunk neural crest cells in how they respond to specific extracellular signals, such that under identical conditions the same signal induces dissimilar cell fate decisions in the two populations in vitro. Conversely, the same differentiated cell types are induced by different signals in the two populations. These in vitro differences in neural crest response are consistent with in vivo manipulations. We also provide evidence that these differences in responsiveness are modulated, at least in part, by differential expression of Hox genes within the neural crest.     

Neural crest development is regulated by the transcription factor Sox9

The neural crest is a transient migratory population of stem cells derived from the dorsal neural folds at the border between neural and non-neural ectoderm. Following induction, prospective neural crest cells are segregated within the neuroepithelium and then delaminate from the neural tube and migrate into the periphery, where they generate multiple differentiated cell types. The intrinsic determinants that direct this process are not well defined. Group E Sox genes (Sox8, Sox9 and Sox10) are expressed in the prospective neural crest and Sox9 expression precedes expression of premigratory neural crest markers. Here, we show that group E Sox genes act at two distinct steps in neural crest differentiation. Forced expression of Sox9 promotes neural-crest-like properties in neural tube progenitors at the expense of central nervous system neuronal differentiation. Subsequently, in migratory neural crest cells, SoxE gene expression biases cells towards glial cell and melanocyte fate, and away from neuronal lineages. Although SoxE genes are sufficient to initiate neural crest development they do not efficiently induce the delamination of ectopic neural crest cells from the neural tube consistent with the idea that this event is independently controlled. Together, these data identify a role for group E Sox genes in the initiation of neural crest development and later SoxE genes influence the differentiation pathway adopted by migrating neural crest cells.     

The dorsal neural tube: A dynamic setting for cell fate decisions

The dorsal neural tube first generates neural crest cells that exit the neural primordium following an epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal conversion to become sympathetic ganglia, Schwann cells, dorsal root sensory ganglia, and melanocytes of the skin. Following the end of crest emigration, the dorsal midline of the neural tube becomes the roof plate, a signaling center for the organization of dorsal neuronal cell types. Recent lineage analysis performed before the onset of crest delamination revealed that the dorsal tube is a highly dynamic region sequentially traversed by fate‐restricted crest progenitors. Furthermore, prospective roof plate cells were shown to originate ventral to presumptive crest and to progressively relocate dorsalward to occupy their definitive midline position following crest delamination. These data raise important questions regarding the mechanisms of cell emigration in relation to fate acquisition, and suggest the possibility that spatial and/or temporal information in the dorsal neural tube determines initial segregation of neural crest cells into their derivatives. In addition, they emphasize the need to address what controls the end of neural crest production and consequent roof plate formation, a fundamental issue for understanding the separation between central and peripheral lineages during development of the nervous system. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 70: 796–812, 2010.     

Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis

Neural crest cells are pluripotent cells that emerge from the neural epithelium, migrate extensively and differentiate into numerous derivatives, including neurons, glial cells, pigment cells and connective tissue. Major questions concerning their morphogenesis include: (1) what establishes the pathways of migration? And (2), what controls the final destination and differentiation of various neural crest subpopulations? These questions will be addressed in this Review. Neural crest cells from the trunk level have been explored most extensively. Studies show that melanoblasts are specified shortly after they depart from the neural tube and this specification directs their migration into the dorsolateral pathway. We also consider other reports that present strong evidence for ventrally migrating neural crest cells being similarly fate restricted. Cranial neural crest cells have been less analyzed in this regard but the preponderance of evidence indicates that either the cranial neural crest cells are not fate-restricted or are extremely plastic in their developmental capability and that specification does not control pathfinding. Thus, the guidance mechanisms that control cranial neural crest migration and their behavior vary significantly from the trunk.The vagal neural crest arises at the axial level between the cranial and trunk neural crest and represents a transitional cell population between the head and trunk neural crest. We summarize new data to support this claim. In particular, we show that: (1) the vagal-level neural crest cells exhibit modest developmental bias; (2) there are differences in the migratory behavior between the anterior and the posterior vagal neural crest cells reminiscent of the cranial and the trunk neural crest, respectively and (3) the vagal neural crest cells take the dorsolateral pathway to the pharyngeal arches and the heart, but take the ventral pathway to the peripheral nervous system and the gut. However, these pathways are not rigidly specified because of prior fate restriction. Understanding the molecular, cellular and behavioral differences between these three populations of neural crest cells will be of enormous assistance when trying to understand the evolution of the neck.Key words: neural crest, morphogenesis, cell migration, chicken embryo, fate restriction, vagal neural crest, pathways     

How to become neural crest: from segregation to delamination

The development of the neural crest up to the stage where they leave the neural tube can be observed as a series of concatenated but independent events that involve dorsalization of the neural plate/neural tube, neural crest induction, segregation and stabilization, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and delamination. During all these processes, the nascent neural crest cells are subjected to the influence of different signals and have to overcome competition for cell fate and apoptotic signals. In addition, striking rostrocaudal differences unveil how the regulatory cascades are somehow different but still can lead to the production of bona fide neural crest cells.     

Anterior/Posterior Influences on Neural Crest-Derived Pigment Cell Differentiation

The neural crest of vertebrate embryos has been used to elucidate steps involved in early embryonic cellular processes such as differentiation and migration. Neural crest cells form a ridge along the dorsal midline and subsequently they migrate throughout the embryo and differentiate into a wide variety of cell types. Intrinsic factors and environmental cues distributed along the neural tube, along the migratory pathways, and/or at the location of arrest influence the fate of neural crest cells. Although premigratory cells of the cranial and trunk neural crest exhibit differences in their differentiation potentials, premigratory trunk neural crest cells are generally assumed to have equivalent developmental potentials. Axolotl neural crest cells from different regions of origin, different stages of development, and challenged with different culture media have been analyzed for differentiation preferences pertaining to the pigment cell lineages. We report region-dependent differentiation of chromatophores from trunk neural crest at two developmental stages. Also, dosage with guanosine produces region-specific influences on the production of xanthophores from wild-type embryos. Our results support the hypothesis that spatial and temporal differences among premigratory trunk neural crest cells found along the anteroposterior axis influence developmental potentials and diminish the equivalency of axolotl neural crest cells.     

Cardiovascular malformations with normal smooth muscle differentiation in neural crest-specific type II TGFbeta receptor (Tgfbr2) mutant mice

Previous studies have demonstrated that TGFbeta induces a smooth muscle fate in primary neural crest cells in culture. By crossing a conditional allele of the type II TGFbeta receptor with the neural crest-specific Wnt1cre transgene, we have addressed the in vivo requirement for TGFbeta signaling in smooth muscle specification and differentiation. We find that elimination of the TGFbeta receptor does not alter neural crest cell specification to a smooth muscle fate in the cranial or cardiac domains, and that a smooth muscle fate is not realized by trunk neural crest cells in either control or mutant embryos. Instead, mutant embryos exhibit with complete penetrance two very specific and mechanistically distinct cardiovascular malformations--persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA) and interrupted aortic arch (IAA-B). Pharyngeal organ defects such as those seen in models of DiGeorge syndrome were not observed, arguing against an early perturbation of the cardiac neural crest cell lineage. We infer that TGFbeta is an essential morphogenic signal for the neural crest cell lineage in specific aspects of cardiovascular development, although one that is not required for smooth muscle differentiation.     

Isolation of a stem cell for neurons and glia from the mammalian neural crest.

We have isolated mammalian neural crest cells using a monoclonal antibody to the low affinity NGF receptor, and established conditions for the serial propagation of these cells in clonal culture to assess their developmental potential. This analysis indicates that, first, single mammalian neural crest cells are multipotent, able to generate at least neurons and Schwann cells like their avian counterparts. Second, multipotent neural crest cells generate multipotent progeny, indicating that they are capable of self-renewal and therefore are stem cells. Third, multipotent neural crest cells also generate some clonal progeny that form only neurons or glia, suggesting the production of committed neuroblasts and glioblasts. Manipulation of the substrate alters the fate of the multipotent cells. These findings have implications for models of neural crest development in vivo, and establish a system for studying the generation of cellular diversity by a multipotent stem cell in vitro.     

Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis

Neural crest cells are pluripotent cells that emerge from the neural epithelium, migrate extensively, and differentiate into numerous derivatives, including neurons, glial cells, pigment cells and connective tissue. Major questions concerning their morphogenesis include: 1) what establishes the pathways of migration and 2) what controls the final destination and differentiation of various neural crest subpopulations. These questions will be addressed in this review. Neural crest cells from the trunk level have been explored most extensively. Studies show that melanoblasts are specified shortly after they depart from the neural tube, and this specification directs their migration into the dorsolateral pathway. We also consider other reports that present strong evidence for ventrally migrating neural crest cells being similarly fate restricted. Cranial neural crest cells have been less analyzed in this regard but the preponderance of evidence indicates that either the cranial neural crest cells are not fate-restricted, or are extremely plastic in their developmental capability and that specification does not control pathfinding. Thus, the guidance mechanisms that control cranial neural crest migration and their behavior vary significantly from the trunk. The vagal neural crest arises at the axial level between the cranial and trunk neural crest and represents a transitional cell population between the head and trunk neural crest. We summarize new data to support this claim. In particular, we show that: 1) the vagal-level neural crest cells exhibit modest developmental bias; 2) there are differences in the migratory behavior between the anterior and the posterior vagal neural crest cells reminiscent of the cranial and the trunk neural crest, respectively; 3) the vagal neural crest cells take the dorsolateral pathway to the pharyngeal arches and the heart, but the ventral pathway to the peripheral nervous system and the gut. However, these pathways are not rigidly specified because of prior fate restriction. Understanding the molecular, cellular and behavioral differences between these three populations of neural crest cells will be of enormous assistance when trying to understand the evolution of the neck.     

Context-dependent regulation of fate decisions in multipotent progenitor cells of the peripheral nervous system

A challenging problem in neural crest development is to understand how a migratory population of multipotent stem cells gives rise to a diverse array of differentiated cell types in the correct spatiotemporal manner. There is now ample evidence that this process involves the generation of postmigratory progenitor cells present in a variety of neural crest targets. When individual progenitors are challenged by instructive growth factors they are able to produce neural and non-neural cells, raising the question of how fate restrictions appropriate to a given embryonic location are regulated in multipotent postmigratory progenitor cells. Although some of the extracellular cues involved have been identified, it is likely that fate decisions in progenitor cells are controlled by the combinatorial action of multiple environmental signals. Moreover, cell type specificity is thought to be regulated by an interplay between extracellular and intracellular cues. We are just beginning to unravel some of the mechanisms that allow the context-dependent integration of cell-extrinsic and cell-intrinsic signals in multipotent progenitor cells.     

Xenopus Id3 is required downstream of Myc for the formation of multipotent neural crest progenitor cells

Neural crest cells, a population of proliferative, migratory, tissue-invasive stem cells, are a defining feature of vertebrate embryos. These cells arise at the neural plate border during a time in development when precursors of the central nervous system and the epidermis are responding to the extracellular signals that will ultimately dictate their fates. Neural crest progenitors, by contrast, must be maintained in a multipotent state until after neural tube closure. Although the molecular mechanisms governing this process have yet to be fully elucidated, recent work has suggested that Myc functions to prevent premature cell fate decisions in neural crest forming regions of the early ectoderm. Here, we show that the small HLH protein Id3 is a Myc target that plays an essential role in the formation and maintenance of neural crest stem cells. A morpholino-mediated 'knockdown' of Id3 protein results in embryos that lack neural crest. Moreover, forced expression of Id3 maintains the expression of markers of the neural crest progenitor state beyond the time when they would normally be downregulated and blocks the differentiation of neural crest derivatives. These results shed new light on the mechanisms governing the formation and maintenance of a developmentally and clinically important cell population.     

Normal fate and altered function of the cardiac neural crest cell lineage in retinoic acid receptor mutant embryos

Mouse embryos lacking the retinoic acid (RA) receptors RARalpha1 and RARbeta suffer from a failure to properly septate (divide) the early outflow tract of the heart into distinct aortic and pulmonary channels, a phenotype termed persistent truncus arteriosus. This phenotype is associated with a failure in the development of the cardiac neural crest cell lineage, which normally forms the aorticopulmonary septum. In this study, we examined the fate of the neural crest lineage in RARalpha1/RARbeta mutant embryos by crossing with the Wnt1-cre and conditional R26R alleles, which together constitute a genetic lineage marker for the neural crest. We find that the number, migration, and terminal fate of the cardiac neural crest is normal in mutant embryos; however, the specific function of these cells in forming the aorticopulmonary septum is impaired. We furthermore show that the neural crest cells themselves do not utilize retinoid receptors and do not respond to RA during this process, but rather that the phenotype is cell non-autonomous for the neural crest cell lineage. This suggests that an alternative tissue in the vicinity of the outflow tract of the heart responds directly to RA, and thereby induces or permits the neural crest cell lineage to initiate aorticopulmonary septation.