A high-throughput method for cloning and sequencing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integration sites

Integration of retroviral DNA is nonspecific and can occur at many sites throughout chromosomes. However, the process is not uniformly distributed, and both hot and cold spots for integration exist. The mechanism that determines target site specificity is not well understood. Because of the nonspecific and widespread nature of integration, studies analyzing the mechanism and factors that control target site selection require the collection and analysis of a large library of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proviral clones. Such analyses are time-consuming and labor-intensive using conventional means. We have developed an efficient and high-throughput method of sequencing and mapping a large number of independent integration sites in the absence of any selection or bias. The new assay involves the use of a modified HIV-1 (NL-Mme) containing a type IIS restriction site, MmeI, at the right end of viral DNA. Digestion of genomic DNA from NL-Mme-infected cells generated viral DNA-containing fragments of a discrete size. Subsequent ligation-mediated PCR yielded short integration site fragments termed Int-tags, which were concatemerized for determining multiple integration sites in a single sequencing reaction. Analysis of chromosomal features and sequence preference associated with integration events confirmed the validity of the new high-throughput assay. The assay will aid the effort in understanding the mechanisms of target site selection during HIV-1 DNA integration, and the described methodology can be adapted easily to integration site studies involving other retroviruses and transposons.     

Site-specific integration of retroviral DNA in human cells using fusion proteins consisting of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase and the designed polydactyl zinc-finger protein E2C

During the life cycle of retroviruses, establishment of a productive infection requires stable joining of a DNA copy of the viral RNA genome into host cell chromosomes. Retroviruses are thus promising vectors for the efficient and stable delivery of genes in therapeutic protocols. Integration of retroviral DNA is catalyzed by the viral enzyme integrase (IN), and one salient feature of retroviral DNA integration is its lack of specificity, as many chromosomal sites can serve as targets for integration. Despite the promise for success in the clinic, one major drawback of the retrovirus-based vector is that any unintended insertion events from the therapy can potentially lead to deleterious effects in patients, as demonstrated by the development of malignancies in both animal and human studies. One approach to directing integration into predetermined DNA sites is fusing IN to a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein, which results in a bias of integration near the recognition site of the fusion partner. Encouraging results have been generated in vitro and in vivo using fusion protein constructs of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 IN and E2C, a designed polydactyl zinc-finger protein that specifically recognizes an 18-base pair DNA sequence. This review focuses on the method for preparing infectious virions containing the IN fusion proteins and on the quantitative PCR assays for determining integration site specificity. Efforts to engineer IN to recognize specific target DNA sequences within the genome may lead to development of effective retroviral vectors that can safely deliver gene-based therapeutics in a clinical setting.     

A pro-inflammatory role of deubiquitinating enzyme cylindromatosis (CYLD) in vascular smooth muscle cells

Retroviral vectors have been employed in clinical trials for gene therapy owing to their relative large packaging capacity, alterable cell tropism, and chromosomal integration for stable transgene expression. However, uncontrollable integrations of transgenes are likely to cause safety issues, such as insertional mutagenesis. A targeted transgene integration system for retroviral vectors, therefore, is a straightforward way to address the insertional mutagenesis issue. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is the only known virus capable of targeted integration in human cells. In the presence of AAV Rep proteins, plasmids possessing the p5 integration efficiency element (p5IEE) can be integrated into the AAV integration site (AAVS1) in the human genome. In this report, we describe a system that can target the circular DNA derived from non-integrating retroviral vectors to the AAVS1 site by utilizing the Rep/p5IEE integration mechanism. Our results showed that after G418 selection 30% of collected clones had retroviral DNA targeted at the AAVS1 site.     

Molecular mechanisms of retroviral integration site selection

Retroviral replication proceeds through an obligate integrated DNA provirus, making retroviral vectors attractive vehicles for human gene-therapy. Though most of the host cell genome is available for integration, the process of integration site selection is not random. Retroviruses differ in their choice of chromatin-associated features and also prefer particular nucleotide sequences at the point of insertion. Lentiviruses including HIV-1 preferentially integrate within the bodies of active genes, whereas the prototypical gammaretrovirus Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV) favors strong enhancers and active gene promoter regions. Integration is catalyzed by the viral integrase protein, and recent research has demonstrated that HIV-1 and MoMLV targeting preferences are in large part guided by integrase-interacting host factors (LEDGF/p75 for HIV-1 and BET proteins for MoMLV) that tether viral intasomes to chromatin. In each case, the selectivity of epigenetic marks on histones recognized by the protein tether helps to determine the integration distribution. In contrast, nucleotide preferences at integration sites seem to be governed by the ability for the integrase protein to locally bend the DNA duplex for pairwise insertion of the viral DNA ends. We discuss approaches to alter integration site selection that could potentially improve the safety of retroviral vectors in the clinic.     

Deciphering the code for retroviral integration target site selection

Upon cell invasion, retroviruses generate a DNA copy of their RNA genome and integrate retroviral cDNA within host chromosomal DNA. Integration occurs throughout the host cell genome, but target site selection is not random. Each subgroup of retrovirus is distinguished from the others by attraction to particular features on chromosomes. Despite extensive efforts to identify host factors that interact with retrovirion components or chromosome features predictive of integration, little is known about how integration sites are selected. We attempted to identify markers predictive of retroviral integration by exploiting Precision-Recall methods for extracting information from highly skewed datasets to derive robust and discriminating measures of association. ChIPSeq datasets for more than 60 factors were compared with 14 retroviral integration datasets. When compared with MLV, PERV or XMRV integration sites, strong association was observed with STAT1, acetylation of H3 and H4 at several positions, and methylation of H2AZ, H3K4, and K9. By combining peaks from ChIPSeq datasets, a supermarker was identified that localized within 2 kB of 75% of MLV proviruses and detected differences in integration preferences among different cell types. The supermarker predicted the likelihood of integration within specific chromosomal regions in a cell-type specific manner, yielding probabilities for integration into proto-oncogene LMO2 identical to experimentally determined values. The supermarker thus identifies chromosomal features highly favored for retroviral integration, provides clues to the mechanism by which retrovirus integration sites are selected, and offers a tool for predicting cell-type specific proto-oncogene activation by retroviruses.     

Isolation and analysis of retroviral integration targets by solo long terminal repeat inverse PCR

Upon retroviral infection, the genomic RNA is reverse transcribed to make proviral DNA, which is then integrated into the host chromosome. Although the viral elements required for successful integration have been extensively characterized, little is known about the host DNA structure constituting preferred targets for proviral integration. In order to elucidate the mechanism for the target selection, comparison of host DNA sequences at proviral integration sites may be useful. To achieve simultaneous analysis of the upstream and downstream host DNA sequences flanking each proviral integration site, a Moloney murine leukemia virus-based retroviral vector was designed so that its integrated provirus could be removed by Cre-loxP homologous recombination, leaving a solo long terminal repeat (LTR). Taking advantage of the solo LTR, inverse PCR was carried out to amplify both the upstream and downstream cellular flanking DNA. The method called solo LTR inverse PCR, or SLIP, proved useful for simultaneously cloning the upstream and downstream flanking sequences of individual proviral integration sites from the polyclonal population of cells harboring provirus at different chromosomal sites. By the SLIP method, nucleotide sequences corresponding to 38 independent proviral integration targets were determined and, interestingly, atypical virus-host DNA junction structures were found in more than 20% of the cases. Characterization of retroviral integration sites using the SLIP method may provide useful insights into the mechanism for proviral integration and its target selection.     

Tethering human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes to target DNA promotes integration at nearby sites.

Integration of retroviral cDNA in vivo is normally not sequence specific with respect to the integration target DNA. We have been investigating methods for directing the integration of retroviral DNA to predetermined sites, with the dual goal of understanding potential mechanisms governing normal site selection and developing possible methods for gene therapy. To this end, we have fused retroviral integrase enzymes to sequence-specific DNA-binding domains and investigated target site selection by the resulting proteins. In a previous study, we purified and analyzed a fusion protein composed of human immunodeficiency virus integrase linked to the DNA-binding domain of lambda repressor. This fusion could direct selective integration in vitro into target DNA containing lambda repressor binding sites. Here we investigate the properties of a fusion integrase in the context of a human immunodeficiency virus provirus. We used a fusion of integrase to the DNA binding domain of the zinc finger protein zif268 (IN-zif). Initially we found that the fusion was highly detrimental to replication as measured by the multinuclear activation of a galactosidase indicator (MAGI) assay for infected centers. However, we found that viruses containing mixtures of wild-type integrase and IN-zif were infectious. We prepared preintegration complexes from cells infected with these viruses and found that such complexes directed increased integration near zif268 recognition sites.     

Functional and structural characterization of the integrase from the prototype foamy virus

Establishment of the stable provirus is an essential step in retroviral replication, orchestrated by integrase (IN), a virus-derived enzyme. Until now, available structural information was limited to the INs of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), avian sarcoma virus (ASV) and their close orthologs from the Lentivirus and Alpharetrovirus genera. Here, we characterized the in vitro activity of the prototype foamy virus (PFV) IN from the Spumavirus genus and determined the three-dimensional structure of its catalytic core domain (CCD). Recombinant PFV IN displayed robust and almost exclusively concerted integration activity in vitro utilizing donor DNA substrates as short as 16 bp, underscoring its significance as a model for detailed structural studies. Comparison of the HIV-1, ASV and PFV CCD structures highlighted both conserved as well as unique structural features such as organization of the active site and the putative host factor binding face. Despite possessing very limited sequence identity to its HIV counterpart, PFV IN was sensitive to HIV IN strand transfer inhibitors, suggesting that this class of inhibitors target the most conserved features of retroviral IN-DNA complexes.     

Impact of Nucleoporin-Mediated Chromatin Localization and Nuclear Architecture on HIV Integration Site Selection

It has been known for a number of years that integration sites of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA show a preference for actively expressed chromosomal locations. A number of viral and cellular proteins are implicated in this process, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. Two recent breakthrough publications advance our understanding of HIV integration site selection by focusing on the localization of the preferred target genes of integration. These studies reveal that knockdown of certain nucleoporins and components of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking alter integration site preference, not by altering the trafficking of the viral genome but by altering the chromatin subtype localization relative to the structure of the nucleus. Here, we describe the link between the nuclear basket nucleoporins (Tpr and Nup153) and chromatin organization and how altering the host environment by manipulating nuclear structure may have important implications for the preferential integration of HIV into actively transcribed genes, facilitating efficient viral replication.