组蛋白H3变体H3.3及其在细胞重编程中的作用

组蛋白是真核生物中一类进化上相对保守的蛋白质。由组蛋白八聚体及缠绕其上的DNA构成的核小体是真核生物染色质的基本组成单位。核小体使DNA保持固缩状态,既能维持基因组的稳定性,又能保证DNA序列可以正确地进行复制、转录、重组和修复。核小体调控细胞的生物过程除了通过组蛋白翻译后修饰,还可以通过组蛋白变体替换的方式进行。研究发现,组蛋白H3变体H3.3与常规组蛋白H3尽管仅有几个氨基酸的区别,但H3.3却能由特异的分子伴侣介导,整合进入染色质的特定区域,从而发挥不同的作用。同时,H3.3作为一种母源因子在正常受精和体细胞核移植等细胞重编程过程中也发挥着重要作用。本文总结了H3.3的结构特点和富集情况,探讨了特异的分子伴侣及其在细胞重编程中的作用,以期为提高体细胞重编程效率提供新思路,为体细胞重编程的应用奠定基础。     

Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis

Deposition of the major histone H3 (H3.1) is coupled to DNA synthesis during DNA replication and possibly DNA repair, whereas histone variant H3.3 serves as the replacement variant for the DNA-synthesis-independent deposition pathway. To address how histones H3.1 and H3.3 are deposited into chromatin through distinct pathways, we have purified deposition machineries for these histones. The H3.1 and H3.3 complexes contain distinct histone chaperones, CAF-1 and HIRA, that we show are necessary to mediate DNA-synthesis-dependent and -independent nucleosome assembly, respectively. Notably, these complexes possess one molecule each of H3.1/H3.3 and H4, suggesting that histones H3 and H4 exist as dimeric units that are important intermediates in nucleosome formation. This finding provides new insights into possible mechanisms for maintenance of epigenetic information after chromatin duplication.     

技术与方法体外组装含有组蛋白变体H2A.Z及H3.3的核小体

核小体是构成真核生物染色质的基本结构单位,组蛋白变体H2A.Z及H3.3对染色质结构及基因转录过程发挥着重要的调控作用。体内研究核小体及染色质结构受到诸多因素限制,体外重构含有H2A.Z及H3.3的核小体结构是研究与组蛋白变体相关基因表达调控的重要方法之一。实验表达纯化了6种组蛋白,在复性的过程中装配了含有H2A.Z和H3.3的组蛋白八聚体。基于DNA序列10bp周期性及序列模体设计了3条易于形成核小体的DNA序列,通过PCR大量扩增的方法,回收了标记Cy3荧光分子的目的DNA序列。采用盐透析法体外组装了含有H2A.Z和H3.3的核小体结构,利用荧光标记、EB染色及考马斯亮蓝染色检测了含有组蛋白变体的核小体形成效率及形成过程的吉布斯自由能变化。结果发现,设计的3条DNA序列可以有效地组装形成含有组蛋白电梯的核小体结构,而且随着组蛋白八聚体与DNA比例的增加,核小体的形成效率显著提高;采用Cy3荧光标记可以灵敏且定量地计算组装过程的吉布斯自由能。该方法的建立对研究组蛋白变体相关的结构生物学及转录调控等具有一定的意义。     

The Differential Mobilization of Histones H3.1 and H3.3 by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Relates Histone Dynamics to the Assembly of Viral Chromatin

During lytic infections, HSV-1 genomes are assembled into unstable nucleosomes. The histones required for HSV-1 chromatin assembly, however, are in the cellular chromatin. We have shown that linker (H1) and core (H2B and H4) histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection, and proposed that the mobilized histones are available for assembly into viral chromatin. However, the actual relevance of histone mobilization remained unknown. We now show that canonical H3.1 and variant H3.3 are also mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Mobilization required no HSV-1 protein expression, although immediate early or early proteins enhanced it. We used the previously known differential association of H3.3 and H3.1 with HSV-1 DNA to test the relevance of histone mobilization. H3.3 binds to HSV-1 genomes first, whereas H3.1 only binds after HSV-1 DNA replication initiates. Consistently, H3.3 and H3.1 were differentially mobilized. H3.1 mobilization decreased with HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 mobilization was largely unaffected by it. These results support a model in which previously mobilized H3.1 is immobilized by assembly into viral chromatin during HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 is mobilized and assembled into HSV-1 chromatin throughout infection. The differential mobilizations of H3.3 and H3.1 are consistent with their differential assembly into viral chromatin. These data therefore relate nuclear histone dynamics to the composition of viral chromatin and provide the first evidence that histone mobilization relates to viral chromatin assembly.     

Histone H3.3 phosphorylation promotes heterochromatin formation by inhibiting H3K9/K36 histone demethylase

Histone H3.3 is an H3 variant which differs from the canonical H3.1/2 at four residues, including a serine residue at position 31 which is evolutionarily conserved. The H3.3 S31 residue is phosphorylated (H3.3 S31Ph) at heterochromatin regions including telomeres and pericentric repeats. However, the role of H3.3 S31Ph in these regions remains unknown. In this study, we find that H3.3 S31Ph regulates heterochromatin accessibility at telomeres during replication through regulation of H3K9/K36 histone demethylase KDM4B. In mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, substitution of S31 with an alanine residue (H3.3 A31 –phosphorylation null mutant) results in increased KDM4B activity that removes H3K9me3 from telomeres. In contrast, substitution with a glutamic acid (H3.3 E31, mimics S31 phosphorylation) inhibits KDM4B, leading to increased H3K9me3 and DNA damage at telomeres. H3.3 E31 expression also increases damage at other heterochromatin regions including the pericentric heterochromatin and Y chromosome-specific satellite DNA repeats. We propose that H3.3 S31Ph regulation of KDM4B is required to control heterochromatin accessibility of repetitive DNA and preserve chromatin integrity.     

The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly

Two very similar H3 histones-differing at only four amino acid positions-are produced in Drosophila cells. Here we describe a mechanism of chromatin regulation whereby the variant H3.3 is deposited at particular loci, including active rDNA arrays. While the major H3 is incorporated strictly during DNA replication, amino acid changes toward H3.3 allow replication-independent (RI) deposition. In contrast to replication-coupled (RC) deposition, RI deposition does not require the N-terminal tail. H3.3 is the exclusive substrate for RI deposition, and its counterpart is the only substrate retained in yeast. RI substitution of H3.3 provides a mechanism for the immediate activation of genes that are silenced by histone modification. Inheritance of newly deposited nucleosomes may then mark sites as active loci.     

Screen for DNA-damage-responsive histone modifications identifies H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac in human cells

Recognition and repair of damaged DNA occurs within the context of chromatin. The key protein components of chromatin are histones, whose post-translational modifications control diverse chromatin functions. Here, we report our findings from a large-scale screen for DNA-damage-responsive histone modifications in human cells. We have identified specific phosphorylations and acetylations on histone H3 that decrease in response to DNA damage. Significantly, we find that DNA-damage-induced changes in H3S10p, H3S28p and H3.3S31p are a consequence of cell-cycle re-positioning rather than DNA damage per se. In contrast, H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac, a mark previously uncharacterized in human cells, are rapidly and reversibly reduced in response to DNA damage. Finally, we show that the histone acetyl-transferase GCN5/KAT2A acetylates H3K56 in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, our data indicate that though most histone modifications do not change appreciably after genotoxic stress, H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac are reduced in response to DNA damage in human cells.     

High histone variant H3.3 content in mouse prospermatogonia suggests a role in epigenetic reformatting

Histone variants can incorporate into the nucleosome outside of S-phase. Some are known to play important roles in mammalian germ cell development, this cell lineage being characterized by long phases of quiescence, a protracted meiotic phase, and genome-wide epigenetic reformatting events. The best known example of such an event is the global-scale erasure of DNA methylation in sexually indifferent primordial germ cells, then its re-establishment in fetal prospermatogonia and growing oocytes. Histone H3 and its post-translationally modified forms provide important waypoints in the establishment of epigenetic states. Using mass spectrometry and immunoblotting, we show that the H3.3 replacement variant is present at an unusually high amount in mouse prospermatogonia at the peak stage of global DNA methylation re-establishment. We speculate that H3.3 facilitates this process through achieving a greater level of accessibility of chromatin modifiers to DNA.     

Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote

In mammalian fertilization, the paternal genome is delivered to the secondary oocyte by sperm with protamine compacted DNA, while the maternal genome is arrested in meiotic metaphase II. Thus, at the beginning of fertilization, the two gametic chromatin sets are strikingly different. We elaborate on this contrast by reporting asymmetry for histone H3 type in the pre-S-phase zygote when male chromatin is virtually devoid of histone H3.1/3.2. Localization of the histone H3.3/H4 assembly factor Hira with the paternal chromatin indicates the presence of histone H3.3. In conjunction with this, we performed a systematic immunofluorescence analysis of histone N-tail methylations at position H3K4, H3K9, H3K27 and H4K20 up to the young pronucleus stage and show that asymmetries reported earlier are systematic for virtually all di- and tri-methylations but not for mono-methylation of H3K4 and H4K20, the only marks studied present in the early male pronucleus. For H4K20 the expanding male chromatin is rapidly mono-methylated. This coincides with the formation of maternally derived nucleosomes, a process which is observed as early as sperm chromatin decondensation occurs. Absence of tri-methylated H3K9, tri-methylated H4K20 and presence of loosely anchored HP1-beta combined with the homogenous presence of mono-methylated H4K20 suggests the absence of a division of the paternal chromatin in eu- and heterochromatin. In summary the male, in contrast to female G1 chromatin, is uniform and contains predominantly histone H3.3 as histone H3 variant.