Molecular anatomy of the human excision nuclease assembled at sites of DNA damage

Human nucleotide excision repair is initiated by six repair factors (XPA, RPA, XPC-HR23B, TFIIH, XPF-ERCC1, and XPG) which sequentially assemble at sites of DNA damage and effect excision of damage-containing oligonucleotides. We here describe the molecular anatomy of the human excision nuclease assembled at the site of a psoralen-adducted thymine. Three polypeptides, primarily positioned 5' to the damage, are in close physical proximity to the psoralen lesion and thus are cross-linked to the damaged DNA: these proteins are RPA70, RPA32, and the XPD subunit of TFIIH. While both XPA and XPC bind damaged DNA and are required for XPD cross-linking to the psoralen-adducted base, neither XPA nor XPC is cross-linked to the psoralen adduct. The presence of other repair factors, in particular TFIIH, alters the mode of RPA binding and the position of its subunits relative to the psoralen lesion. Based on these results, we propose that RPA70 makes the initial contact with psoralen-damaged DNA but that within preincision complexes, it is RPA32 and XPD that are in close contact with the lesion.     

DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells

For the bulk of mammalian DNA, the core protein factors needed for damage recognition and incision during nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the XPA protein, the heterotrimeric RPA protein, the 6 to 9-subunit TFIIH, the XPC-hHR23B complex, the XPG nuclease, and the ERCC1-XPF nuclease. With varying efficiencies, NER can repair a very wide range of DNA adducts, from bulky helical distortions to subtle modifications on sugar residues. Several of the NER factors have an affinity for damaged DNA. The strongest binding factor appears to be XPC-hHR23B but preferential binding to damage is also a property of XPA, RPA, and components of TFIIH. It appears that in order to be repaired by NER, an adduct in DNA must have two features: it must create a helical distortion, and there must be a change in DNA chemistry. Initial recognition of the distortion is the most likely function for XPC-hHR23B and perhaps XPA and RPA, whereas TFIIH is well-suited to locate the damaged DNA strand by locating altered DNA chemistry that blocks translocation of the XPB and XPD components.     

Tumor suppressor p53 dependent recruitment of nucleotide excision repair factors XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage

Functional tumor suppressor p53 is mainly required for efficient global genomic repair (GGR), a subpathway of nucleotide excisions repair (NER). In this study, the regulatory effect of p53, on the spaciotemporal recruitment of XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage sites, was investigated in repair-proficient and -deficient human cells in situ. Photoproducts were induced through micropore UV irradiation of discrete subnuclear areas of intact cells and the specific lesions, as well as recruited repair factors, were detected by immunofluorescent intensity and density of the damaged DNA subnuclear spots (SNS). Both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PP) were visualized in situ at SNS within irradiated nuclear foci. The in situ repair kinetics revealed that p53-WT normal fibroblasts are proficient for the repair of both CPD and 6-4PP, whereas, p53-Null Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) fibroblasts fail to efficiently repair CPD but not 6-4PP. Colocalization experiments of the NER factors showed that in normal human cells, XPC and TFIIH are rapidly and efficiently recruited to DNA damage within SNS. By contrast, recruitment of both XPC and TFIIH to DNA damage in SNS occurred much less efficiently in p53-Null or p53-compromised cells. The total cellular levels of XPC and XPB were similar in both p53-WT and -Null cells and remained unchanged up to 24h following UV irradiation. The results also showed that dispersal of recruited XPC and TFIIH from DNA damage SNS occurs within a short period after DNA damage. Such dispersal requires functional XPA, XPF and XPG proteins. Taken together, the results demonstrated that p53 plays a pronounced role in the damage recognition and subsequent assembly of repair machinery during GGR and the recruitment of XPC and TFIIH to CPD is p53-dependent. Most likely mechanism of this p53 action is through its downstream effector protein, DDB2.     

Recruitment of the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease XPG to sites of UV-induced dna damage depends on functional TFIIH

The structure-specific endonuclease XPG is an indispensable core protein of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery. XPG cleaves the DNA strand at the 3' side of the DNA damage. XPG binding stabilizes the NER preincision complex and is essential for the 5' incision by the ERCC1/XPF endonuclease. We have studied the dynamic role of XPG in its different cellular functions in living cells. We have created mammalian cell lines that lack functional endogenous XPG and stably express enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-tagged XPG. Life cell imaging shows that in undamaged cells XPG-eGFP is uniformly distributed throughout the cell nucleus, diffuses freely, and is not stably associated with other nuclear proteins. XPG is recruited to UV-damaged DNA with a half-life of 200 s and is bound for 4 min in NER complexes. Recruitment requires functional TFIIH, although some TFIIH mutants allow slow XPG recruitment. Remarkably, binding of XPG to damaged DNA does not require the DDB2 protein, which is thought to enhance damage recognition by NER factor XPC. Together, our data present a comprehensive view of the in vivo behavior of a protein that is involved in a complex chromatin-associated process.     

Biochemical analysis of the damage recognition process in nucleotide excision repair

XPA, XPC-hHR23B, RPA, and TFIIH all are the damage recognition proteins essential for the early stage of nucleotide excision repair. Nonetheless, it is not clear how these proteins work together at the damaged DNA site. To get insight into the molecular mechanism of damage recognition, we carried out a comprehensive analysis on the interaction between damage recognition proteins and their assembly on damaged DNA. XPC physically interacted with XPA, but failed to stabilize the XPA-damaged DNA complex. Instead, XPC-hHR23B was effectively displaced from the damaged DNA by the combined action of RPA and XPA. A mutant RPA lacking the XPA interaction domain failed to displace XPC-hHR23B from damaged DNA, suggesting that XPA and RPA cooperate with each other to destabilize the XPC-hHR23B-damaged DNA complex. Interestingly, the presence of hHR23B significantly increased RPA/XPA-mediated displacement of XPC from damaged DNA, suggesting that hHR23B may modulate the binding of XPC to damaged DNA. Together, our results suggest that damage recognition occurs in a multistep process such that XPC-hHR23B initiates damage recognition, which was replaced by combined action of XPA and RPA. XPA and RPA, once forming a complex at the damage site, would likely work with TFIIH, XPG, and ERCC1-XPF for dual incision.     

Order of assembly of human DNA repair excision nuclease.

Human excision nuclease removes DNA damage by concerted dual incisions bracketing the lesion. The dual incisions are accomplished by sequential and partly overlapping actions of six repair factors, RPA, XPA, XPC, TFIIH, XPG, and XPF.ERCC1. Of these, RPA, XPA, and XPC have specific binding affinity for damaged DNA. To learn about the role of these three proteins in damage recognition and the order of assembly of the excision nuclease, we measured the binding affinities of XPA, RPA, and XPC to a DNA fragment containing a single (6-4) photoproduct and determined the rate of damage excision under a variety of reaction conditions. We found that XPC has the highest affinity to DNA and that RPA has the highest selectivity for damaged DNA. Under experimental conditions conducive to binding of either XPA + RPA or XPC to damaged DNA, the rate of damage removal was about 5-fold faster for reactions in which XPA + RPA was the first damage recognition factor presented to DNA compared with reactions in which XPC was the first protein that had the opportunity to bind to DNA. We conclude that RPA and XPA are the initial damage sensing factors of human excision nuclease.     

The human DNA repair factor XPC-HR23B distinguishes stereoisomeric benzo[a]pyrenyl-DNA lesions

Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), a known environmental pollutant and tobacco smoke carcinogen, is metabolically activated to highly tumorigenic B[a]P diol epoxide derivatives that predominantly form N(2)-guanine adducts in cellular DNA. Although nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important cellular defense mechanism, the molecular basis of recognition of these bulky lesions is poorly understood. In order to investigate the effects of DNA adduct structure on NER, three stereoisomeric and conformationally different B[a]P-N(2)-dG lesions were site specifically incorporated into identical 135-mer duplexes and their response to purified NER factors was investigated. Using a permanganate footprinting assay, the NER lesion recognition factor XPC/HR23B exhibits, in each case, remarkably different patterns of helix opening that is also markedly distinct in the case of an intra-strand crosslinked cisplatin adduct. The different extents of helix distortions, as well as differences in the overall binding of XPC/HR23B to double-stranded DNA containing either of the three stereoisomeric B[a]P-N(2)-dG lesions, are correlated with dual incisions catalyzed by a reconstituted incision system of six purified NER factors, and by the full NER apparatus in cell-free nuclear extracts.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.     

Stable binding of human XPC complex to irradiated DNA confers strong discrimination for damaged sites

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of DNA damage requires an efficient means of discrimination between damaged and non-damaged DNA. Cells from humans with xeroderma pigmentosum group C do not perform NER in the bulk of the genome and are corrected by XPC protein, which forms a complex with hHR23B protein. This complex preferentially binds to some types of damaged DNA, but the extent of discrimination in comparison to other NER proteins has not been clear. Recombinant XPC, hHR23B, and XPC-hHR23B complex were purified. In a reconstituted repair system, hHR23B stimulated XPC activity tenfold. Electrophoretic mobility-shift competition measurements revealed a 400-fold preference for binding of XPC-hHR23B to UV damaged over non-damaged DNA. This damage preference is much greater than displayed by the XPA protein. The discrimination power is similar to that determined here in parallel for the XP-E factor UV-DDB, despite the considerably greater molar affinity of UV-DDB for DNA. Binding of XPC-hHR23B to UV damaged DNA was very fast. Damaged DNA-XPC-hHR23B complexes were stable, with half of the complexes remaining four hours after challenge with excess UV-damaged DNA at 30 degrees C. XPC-hHR23B had a higher level of affinity for (6-4) photoproducts than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, and some affinity for DNA treated with cisplatin and alkylating agents. XPC-hHR23B could bind to single-stranded M13 DNA, but only poorly to single-stranded homopolymers. The strong preference of XPC complex for structures in damaged duplex DNA indicates its importance as a primary damage recognition factor in non-transcribed DNA during human NER.     

Strong functional interactions of TFIIH with XPC and XPG in human DNA nucleotide excision repair, without a preassembled repairosome

In mammalian cells, the core factors involved in the damage recognition and incision steps of DNA nucleotide excision repair are XPA, TFIIH complex, XPC-HR23B, replication protein A (RPA), XPG, and ERCC1-XPF. Many interactions between these components have been detected, using different physical methods, in human cells and for the homologous factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Several human nucleotide excision repair (NER) complexes, including a high-molecular-mass repairosome complex, have been proposed. However, there have been no measurements of activity of any mammalian NER protein complex isolated under native conditions. In order to assess relative strengths of interactions between NER factors, we captured TFIIH from cell extracts with an anti-cdk7 antibody, retaining TFIIH in active form attached to magnetic beads. Coimmunoprecipitation of other NER proteins was then monitored functionally in a reconstituted repair system with purified proteins. We found that all detectable TFIIH in gently prepared human cell extracts was present in the intact nine-subunit form. There was no evidence for a repair complex that contained all of the NER components. At low ionic strength TFIIH could associate with functional amounts of each NER factor except RPA. At physiological ionic strength, TFIIH associated with significant amounts of XPC-HR23B and XPG but not other repair factors. The strongest interaction was between TFIIH and XPC-HR23B, indicating a coupled role of these proteins in early steps of repair. A panel of antibodies was used to estimate that there are on the order of 10(5) molecules of each core NER factor per HeLa cell.     

Localization of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein and replication protein A on damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair

The interaction of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA) with damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair (NER) was studied using model dsDNA and bubble-DNA structure with 5-{3-[6-(carboxyamido-fluoresceinyl)amidocapromoyl]allyl}-dUMP lesions in one strand and containing photoreactive 5-iodo-dUMP residues in defined positions. Interactions of XPA and RPA with damaged and undamaged DNA strands were investigated by DNA–protein photocrosslinking and gel shift analysis. XPA showed two maximums of crosslinking intensities located on the 5′-side from a lesion. RPA mainly localized on undamaged strand of damaged DNA duplex and damaged bubble-DNA structure. These results presented for the first time the direct evidence for the localization of XPA in the 5′-side of the lesion and suggested the key role of XPA orientation in conjunction with RPA binding to undamaged strand for the positioning of the NER preincision complex. The findings supported the mechanism of loading of the heterodimer consisting of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 and xeroderma pigmentosum group F proteins by XPA on the 5′-side from the lesion before damaged strand incision. Importantly, the proper orientation of XPA and RPA in the stage of preincision was achieved in the absence of TFIIH and XPG.     

DDB accumulates at DNA damage sites immediately after UV irradiation and directly stimulates nucleotide excision repair.

Damaged DNA-binding protein, DDB, is a heterodimer of p127 and p48 with a high specificity for binding to several types of DNA damage. Mutations in the p48 gene that cause the loss of DDB activity were found in a subset of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E (XP-E) patients and have linked to the deficiency in global genomic repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in these cells. Here we show that with a highly defined system of purified repair factors, DDB can greatly stimulate the excision reaction reconstituted with XPA, RPA, XPC.HR23B, TFIIH, XPF.ERCC1 and XPG, up to 17-fold for CPDs and approximately 2-fold for (6-4) photoproducts (6-4PPs), indicating that no additional factor is required for the stimulation by DDB. Transfection of the p48 cDNA into an SV40-transformed human cell line, WI38VA13, was found to enhance DDB activity and the in vivo removal of CPDs and 6-4PPs. Furthermore, the combined technique of recently developed micropore UV irradiation and immunostaining revealed that p48 (probably in the form of DDB heterodimer) accumulates at locally damaged DNA sites immediately after UV irradiation, and this accumulation is also observed in XP-A and XP-C cells expressing exogenous p48. These results suggest that DDB can rapidly translocate to the damaged DNA sites independent of functional XPA and XPC proteins and directly enhance the excision reaction by core repair factors.     

Centrosome protein centrin 2/caltractin 1 is part of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C complex that initiates global genome nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is carried out by xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) factors. Before the excision reaction, DNA damage is recognized by a complex originally thought to contain the XP group C responsible gene product (XPC) and the human homologue of Rad23 B (HR23B). Here, we show that centrin 2/caltractin 1 (CEN2) is also a component of the XPC repair complex. We demonstrate that nearly all XPC complexes contain CEN2, that CEN2 interacts directly with XPC, and that CEN2, in cooperation with HR23B, stabilizes XPC, which stimulates XPC NER activity in vitro. CEN2 has been shown to play an important role in centrosome duplication. Thus, those findings suggest that the XPC-CEN2 interaction may reflect coupling of cell division and NER.