High salt-induced conversion of Escherichia coli GroEL into a fully functional thermophilic chaperonin

The GroE chaperonin system can adapt to and function at various environmental folding conditions. To examine chaperonin-assisted protein folding at high salt concentrations, we characterized Escherichia coli GroE chaperonin activity in 1.2 m ammonium sulfate. Our data are consistent with GroEL undergoing a conformational change at this salt concentration, characterized by elevated ATPase activity and increased exposure of hydrophobic surface, as indicated by increased binding of the fluorophore bis-(5, 5')-8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid to the chaperonin. The presence of the salt results in increased substrate stringency and dependence on the full GroE system for release and productive folding of substrate proteins. Surprisingly, GroEL is fully functional as a thermophilic chaperonin in high concentrations of ammonium sulfate and is stable at temperatures up to 75 degrees C. At these extreme conditions, GroEL can suppress aggregation and mediate refolding of non-native proteins.     

Conversion of a Chaperonin GroEL-independent Protein into an Obligate Substrate

Chaperones assist protein folding by preventing unproductive protein aggregation in the cell. In Escherichia coli, chaperonin GroEL/GroES (GroE) is the only indispensable chaperone and is absolutely required for the de novo folding of at least ∼60 proteins. We previously found that several orthologs of the obligate GroE substrates in Ureaplasma urealyticum, which lacks the groE gene in the genome, are E. coli GroE-independent folders, despite their significant sequence identities. Here, we investigated the key features that define the GroE dependence. Chimera or random mutagenesis analyses revealed that independent multiple point mutations, and even single mutations, were sufficient to confer GroE dependence on the Ureaplasma MetK. Strikingly, the GroE dependence was well correlated with the propensity to form protein aggregates during folding. The results reveal the delicate balance between GroE dependence and independence. The function of GroE to buffering the aggregation-prone mutations plays a role in maintaining higher genetic diversity of proteins.     

Filamentous morphology in GroE-depleted Escherichia coli induced by impaired folding of FtsE

The chaperonin GroE (GroEL and the cochaperonin GroES) is the only chaperone system that is essential for the viability of Escherichia coli. It is known that GroE-depleted cells exhibit a filamentous morphology, suggesting that GroE is required for the folding of proteins involved in cell division. Although previous studies, including proteome-wide analyses of GroE substrates, have suggested several targets of GroE in cell division, there is no direct in vivo evidence to identify which substrates exhibit obligate dependence on GroE for folding. Among the candidate substrates, we found that prior excess production of FtsE, a protein engaged in cell division, completely suppressed the filamentation of GroE-depleted E. coli. The GroE depletion led to a drastic decrease in FtsE, and the cells exhibited a known phenotype associated with impaired FtsE function. In the GroE-depleted filamentous cells, the localizations of FtsA and ZipA, both of which assemble with the FtsZ septal ring before FtsE, were normal, whereas FtsX, the interaction partner of FtsE, and FtsQ, which is recruited after FtsE, did not localize to the ring, suggesting that the decrease in FtsE is a cause of the filamentous morphology. Finally, a reconstituted cell-free translation system revealed that the folding of newly translated FtsE was stringently dependent on GroEL/GroES. Based on these findings, we concluded that FtsE is a target substrate of the GroE system in E. coli cell division.     

A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin‐dependent substrates

Chaperonins are absolutely required for the folding of a subset of proteins in the cell. An earlier proteome‐wide analysis of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL/GroES (GroE) interactors predicted obligate chaperonin substrates, which were termed Class III substrates. However, the requirement of chaperonins for in vivo folding has not been fully examined. Here, we comprehensively assessed the chaperonin requirement using a conditional GroE expression strain, and concluded that only ～60% of Class III substrates are bona fide obligate GroE substrates in vivo. The in vivo obligate substrates, combined with the newly identified obligate substrates, were termed Class IV substrates. Class IV substrates are restricted to proteins with molecular weights that could be encapsulated in the chaperonin cavity, are enriched in alanine/glycine residues, and have a strong structural preference for aggregation‐prone folds. Notably, ～70% of the Class IV substrates appear to be metabolic enzymes, supporting a hypothetical role of GroE in enzyme evolution.     

Designing a High Throughput Refolding Array Using a Combination of the GroEL Chaperonin and Osmolytes

Although GroE chaperonins and osmolytes had been used separately as protein folding aids, combining these two methods provides a considerable advantage for folding proteins that cannot fold with either osmolytes or chaperonins alone. This technique rapidly identifies superior folding solution conditions for a broad array of proteins that are difficult or impossible to fold by other methods. While testing the broad applicability of this technique, we have discovered that osmolytes greatly simplify the chaperonin reaction by eliminating the requirement for the co-chaperonin GroES which is normally involved in encapsulating folding proteins within the GroEL–GroES cavity. Therefore, combinations of soluble or immobilized GroEL, osmolytes and ATP or even ADP are sufficient to refold the test proteins. The first step in the chaperonin/osmolyte process is to form a stable long-lived chaperonin–substrate protein complex in the absence of nucleotide. In the second step, different osmolyte solutions are added along with nucleotides, thus forming a ‘folding array’ to identify superior folding conditions. The stable chaperonin–substrate protein complex can be concentrated or immobilized prior to osmolyte addition. This procedure prevents-off pathway aggregation during folding/refolding reactions and more importantly allows one to refold proteins at concentrations (~mg/ml) that are substantially higher than the critical aggregation concentration for given protein. This technique can be used for successful refolding of proteins from purified inclusion bodies. Recently, other investigators have used our chaperonin/osmolyte method to demonstrate that a mutant protein that misfolds in human disease can be rescued by GroEL/osmolyte system. Soluble or immobilized GroEL can be easily removed from the released folded protein using simple separation techniques. The method allows for isolation of folded monomeric or oligomeric proteins in quantities sufficient for X-ray crystallography or NMR structural determinations.     

A comparison of the GroE chaperonin requirements for sequentially and structurally homologous malate dehydrogenases: the importance of folding kinetics and solution environment

Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase (EcMDH) and its eukaryotic counterpart, porcine mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (PmMDH), are highly homologous proteins with significant sequence identity (60%) and virtually identical native structural folds. Despite this homology, EcMDH folds rapidly and efficiently in vitro and does not seem to interact with GroE chaperonins at physiological temperatures (37 degrees C), whereas PmMDH folds much slower than EcMDH and requires these chaperonins to fold to the native state at 37 degrees C. Double jump experiments indicate that the slow folding behavior of PmMDH is not limited by proline isomerization. Although the folding enhancer glycerol (<5 m) does not alter the renaturation kinetics of EcMDH, it dramatically accelerates the spontaneous renaturation of PmMDH at all temperatures tested. Kinetic analysis of PmMDH renaturation with increasing glycerol concentrations suggests that this osmolyte increases the on-pathway kinetics of the monomer folding to assembly-competent forms. Other osmolytes such as trimethylamine N-oxide, sucrose, and betaine also reactivate PmMDH at nonpermissive temperatures (37 degrees C). Glycerol jump experiments with preformed GroEL.PmMDH complexes indicate that the shift between stringent (requires ATP and GroES) and relaxed (only requires ATP) complex conformations is rapid (<3-5 s). The similarity in irreversible misfolding kinetics of PmMDH measured with glycerol or the activated chaperonin complex (GroEL.GroES.ATP) suggests that these folding aids may influence the same step in the PmMDH folding reaction. Moreover, the interactions between glycerol-induced PmMDH folding intermediates and GroEL.GroES.ATP are diminished. Our results support the notion that the protein folding kinetics of sequentially and structurally homologous proteins, rather than the structural fold, dictates the GroE chaperonin requirement.     

Influence of the GroE molecular chaperone machine on the in vitro refolding of Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase.

We have studied the effect of the components of the GroE molecular chaperone machine on the refolding of the Escherichia coli enzyme beta-galactosidase, a tetrameric protein whose 116-kDa promoters should not completely fit within the central cavity of the GroEL toroid. In the absence of other additives, GroEL formed a weak complex with chemically denatured beta-galactosidase, reduced its propensity to aggregate, and increased the recovery yields of active enzyme twofold without altering its folding pathway. When present together with the chaperonin, ATP--and to a lesser extent AMP-PNP--reduced the recovery yields and led to the resumption of aggregation. The use of the complete chaperonin system (GroEL, GroES, and ATP) eliminated the GroEL-mediated increase in recovery and folding proceeded less efficiently than in buffer alone. This unusual behavior can be explained in terms of a chaperonin "buffering" effect and the different affinities of GroE complexes for denatured beta-galactosidase.     

GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation.

The molecular chaperone GroE facilitates correct protein folding in vivo and in vitro. The mode of action of GroE was investigated by using refolding of citrate synthase as a model system. In vitro denaturation of this dimeric protein is almost irreversible, since the refolding polypeptide chains aggregate rapidly, as shown directly by a strong, concentration-dependent increase in light scattering. The yields of reactivated citrate synthase were strongly increased upon addition of GroE and MgATP. GroE inhibits aggregation reactions that compete with correct protein folding, as indicated by specific suppression of light scattering. GroEL rapidly forms a complex with unfolded or partially folded citrate synthase molecules. In this complex the refolding protein is protected from aggregation. Addition of GroES and ATP hydrolysis is required to release the polypeptide chain bound to GroEL and to allow further folding to its final, active state.     

The Dynamic Conformational Cycle of the Group I Chaperonin C-Termini Revealed via Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Chaperonins are large ring shaped oligomers that facilitate protein folding by encapsulation within a central cavity. All chaperonins possess flexible C-termini which protrude from the equatorial domain of each subunit into the central cavity. Biochemical evidence suggests that the termini play an important role in the allosteric regulation of the ATPase cycle, in substrate folding and in complex assembly and stability. Despite the tremendous wealth of structural data available for numerous orthologous chaperonins, little structural information is available regarding the residues within the C-terminus. Herein, molecular dynamics simulations are presented which localize the termini throughout the nucleotide cycle of the group I chaperonin, GroE, from Escherichia coli. The simulation results predict that the termini undergo a heretofore unappreciated conformational cycle which is coupled to the nucleotide state of the enzyme. As such, these results have profound implications for the mechanism by which GroE utilizes nucleotide and folds client proteins.     

GroE prevents the accumulation of early folding intermediates of pre-beta-lactamase without changing the folding pathway.

In folding studies of pre-beta-lactamase in the presence of GroE, we investigated the pH dependence of the folding reaction. Two critical intermediates in the folding pathway were defined kinetically. I1 is an early folding intermediate recognized by GroE; the misfolding of I1 leads to aggregation, and this is prevented by GroE. A second intermediate I2 is released from GroE after ATP hydrolysis. Its pH-dependent misfolding to a nonnative form, which is not an aggregate, is not prevented by GroE. From these results, a model is proposed, in which the crucial role of GroE consists of allowing the change from I1 to I2 to take place in the complex. Fluorescence spectra of the pre-beta-lactamase complexed to GroE are very similar to those of the native state. The pathway of pre-beta-lactamase folding is not changed by GroE as evidenced by the same half-time and pH dependence of the folding reaction. GroE probably recognizes the signal sequence and some portion of the mature protein since mature beta-lactamase does not interact with GroE even under conditions of slow folding.     

What distinguishes GroEL substrates from other Escherichia coli proteins?

Experimental studies and theoretical considerations have shown that only a small subset of Escherichia coli proteins fold in vivo with the help of the GroE chaperone system. These proteins, termed GroE substrates, have been divided into three classes: (a) proteins that can fold independently, but are found to associate with GroEL; (b) proteins that require GroE when the cell is under stress; and (c) 'obligatory' proteins that require GroE assistance even under normal conditions. It remains unclear, however, why some proteins need GroE and others do not. Here, we review experimental and computational studies that addressed this question by comparing the sequences and structural, biophysical and evolutionary properties of GroE substrates with those of nonsubstrates. In general, obligatory substrates are found to have lower folding propensities and be more aggregation prone. GroE substrates are also more conserved than other proteins and tend to utilize more optimal codons, but this latter feature is less apparent for obligatory substrates. There is no evidence, however, for any specific sequence signatures although there is a tendency for sequence periodicity. Our review shows that reliable sequence- or structure-based predictions of GroE dependency remain a challenge. We suggest that the different classes of GroE substrates be studied separately and that proper control test sets (e.g. TIM barrel proteins that need GroE for folding versus TIM barrels that fold independently) be used more extensively in such studies.     

Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding.

The Escherichia coli GroE chaperones assist protein folding under conditions where no spontaneous folding occurs. To achieve this, the cooperation of GroEL and GroES, the two protein components of the chaperone system, is an essential requirement. While in many cases GroE simply suppresses unspecific aggregation of non-native proteins by encapsulation, there are examples where folding is accelerated by GroE.Using maltose-binding protein (MBP) as a substrate for GroE, it had been possible to define basic requirements for catalysis of folding. Here, we have analyzed key steps in the interaction of GroE and the MBP mutant Y283D during catalyzed folding. In addition to high temperature, high ionic strength was shown to be a restrictive condition for MBP Y283D folding. In both cases, the complete GroE system (GroEL, GroES and ATP) compensates the deceleration of MBP Y283D folding. Combining kinetic folding experiments and electron microscopy of GroE particles, we demonstrate that at elevated temperatures, symmetrical GroE particles with GroES bound to both ends of the GroEL cylinder play an important role in the efficient catalysis of MBP Y283D refolding. In principle, MBP Y283D folding can be catalyzed during one encapsulation cycle. However, because the commitment to reach the native state is low after only one cycle of ATP hydrolysis, several interaction cycles are required for catalyzed folding.     

Transient conformational remodeling of folding proteins by GroES—individually and in concert with GroEL

The commonly accepted dogma of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system entails protein folding mediated by cycles of several ATP-dependent sequential steps where GroEL interacts with the folding client protein. In contrast, we herein report GroES-mediated dynamic remodeling (expansion and compression) of two different protein substrates during folding: the endogenous substrate MreB and carbonic anhydrase (HCAII), a well-characterized protein folding model. GroES was also found to influence GroEL binding induced unfolding and compression of the client protein underlining the synergistic activity of both chaperonins, even in the absence of ATP. This previously unidentified activity by GroES should have important implications for understanding the chaperonin mechanism and cellular stress response. Our findings necessitate a revision of the GroEL/ES mechanism.     

Folding behavior of chaperonin-mediated substrate protein

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding is complex. There have been diverse results on folding behavior, and the chaperonin molecules have been investigated as enhancing or retarding the folding rate. To understand the diversity of chaperonin-mediated protein folding, we report a study based on simulations using a simplified Gō-type model. By considering effects of affinity between the substrate protein and the chaperonin wall and spatial confinement of the chaperonin cavity, we study the thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of an unfrustrated substrate protein encapsulated in a chaperonin cavity. The affinity makes the hydrophobic residues of the protein bind to the chaperonin wall, and a strong (or weak) affinity results in a large (or small) effect of binding. Compared with the folding in bulk, the folding in chaperonin cavity with different strengths of affinity shows two kinds of behaviors: one with less dependence on the affinity but more reliance on the spatial confinement effect and the other relying strongly on the affinity. It is found that the enhancement or retardation of the folding rate depends on the competition between the spatial confinement and the affinity due to the chaperonin cavity, and a strong affinity produces a slow folding while a weak affinity induces a fast folding. The crossover between two kinds of folding behaviors happens in the case that the favorable effect of confinement is balanced by the unfavorable effect of the affinity, and a critical affinity strength is roughly defined. By analyzing the contacts formed between the residues of the protein and the chaperonin wall and between the residues of the protein themselves, the role of the affinity in the folding processes is studied. The binding of the residues with the chaperonin wall reduces the formation of both native contacts and nonnative contact or mis-contacts, providing a loose structure for further folding after allosteric change of the chaperonin cavity. In addition, 15 single-site-mutated mutants are simulated in order to test the validity of our model and to investigate the importance of affinity. Inspiringly, our results of the folding rates have a good correlation with those obtained from experiments. The folding rates are inversely correlated with the strength of the binding interactions, i.e., the weaker the binding, the faster the folding. We also find that the inner hydrophobic residues have larger effects on the folding kinetics than those of the exterior hydrophobic residues. We suggest that, besides the confinement effect, the affinity acts as another important factor to affect the folding of the substrate proteins in chaperonin systems, providing an understanding of the folding mechanism of the molecular chaperonin systems.     

Effects of confinement in chaperonin assisted protein folding: rate enhancement by decreasing the roughness of the folding energy landscape

Chaperonins, such as the GroE complex of the bacteria Escherichia coli, assist the folding of proteins under non-permissive folding conditions by providing a cavity in which the newly translated or translocated protein can be encapsulated. Whether the chaperonin cage plays a passive role in protecting the protein from aggregation, or an active role in accelerating folding rates, remains a matter of debate. Here, we investigate the role of confinement in chaperonin mediated folding through molecular dynamics simulations. We designed a substrate protein with an alpha/beta sandwich fold, a common structural motif found in GroE substrate proteins and confined it to a spherical hydrophilic cage which mimicked the interior of the GroEL/ES cavity. The thermodynamics and kinetics of folding were studied over a wide range of temperature and cage radii. Confinement was seen to significantly raise the collapse temperature, T(c), as a result of the associated entropy loss of the unfolded state. The folding temperature, T(f), on the other hand, remained unaffected by encapsulation, a consequence of the folding mechanism of this protein that involves an initial collapse to a compact misfolded state prior to rearranging to the native state. Folding rates were observed to be either accelerated or retarded compared to bulk folding rates, depending on the temperature of the simulation. Rate enhancements due to confinement were observed only at temperatures above the temperature T(m), which corresponds to the temperature at which the protein folds fastest. For this protein, T(m) lies above the folding temperature, T(f), implying that encapsulation alone will not lead to a rate enhancement under conditions where the native state is stable (T相似文献   

Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin system of Escherichia coli forms a nano-cage allowing single protein molecules to fold in isolation. However, as the chaperonin can also mediate folding independently of substrate encapsulation, it remained unclear whether the folding cage is essential in vivo. To address this question, we replaced wild-type GroEL with mutants of GroEL having either a reduced cage volume or altered charge properties of the cage wall. A stepwise reduction in cage size resulted in a gradual loss of cell viability, although the mutants bound non-native protein efficiently. Strikingly, a mild reduction in cage size increased the yield and the apparent rate of green fluorescent protein folding, consistent with the view that an effect of steric confinement can accelerate folding. As shown in vitro, the observed acceleration of folding was dependent on protein encapsulation by GroES but independent of GroES cycling regulated by the GroEL ATPase. Altering the net-negative charge of the GroEL cage wall also strongly affected chaperonin function. Based on these findings, the GroEL/GroES compartment is essential for protein folding in vivo.     

The human mitochondrial Hsp60 in the APO conformation forms a stable tetradecameric complex

The human mitochondrial chaperonin is a macromolecular machine that catalyzes the proper folding of mitochondrial proteins and is of vital importance to all cells. This chaperonin is composed of 2 distinct proteins, Hsp60 and Hsp10, that assemble into large oligomeric complexes that mediate the folding of non-native polypeptides in an ATP dependent manner. Here, we report the bacterial expression and purification of fully assembled human Hsp60 and Hsp10 recombinant proteins and that Hsp60 forms a stable tetradecameric double-ring conformation in the absence of co-chaperonin and nucleotide. Evidence of the stable double-ring conformation is illustrated by the 15 Å resolution electron microscopy reconstruction presented here. Furthermore, our biochemical analyses reveal that the presence of a non-native substrate initiates ATP-hydrolysis within the Hsp60/10 chaperonin to commence protein folding. Collectively, these data provide insight into the architecture of the intermediates used by the human mitochondrial chaperonin along its protein folding pathway and lay a foundation for subsequent high resolution structural investigations into the conformational changes of the mitochondrial chaperonin.     

Chaperonin GroEL meets the substrate protein as a "load" of the rings

Chaperonin GroEL is an essential molecular chaperone that assists protein folding in the cell. With the aid of cochaperonin GroES and ATP, double ring-shaped GroEL encapsulates non-native substrate proteins inside the cavity of the GroEL-ES complex. Although extensive studies have revealed the outline of GroEL mechanism over the past decade, central questions remain: What are the in vivo substrate proteins? How does GroEL encapsulate the substrates inside the cavity in spite of an apparent entropic difficulty? Is the folding inside the GroEL-ES cavity the same as bulk spontaneous folding? In this review I summarize the recent progress on in vivo and in vitro aspects of GroEL. In particular, emerging evidence shows that the substrate protein itself influences the chaperonin GroEL structure and reaction cycle. Finally I propose the mechanistic similarity between GroEL and kinesin, a molecular motor that moves along a microtubule in an ATP-dependent manner.