Quantifying the Gurken morphogen gradient in Drosophila oogenesis

Quantitative information about the distribution of morphogens is crucial for understanding their effects on cell-fate determination, yet it is difficult to obtain through direct measurements. We have developed a parameter estimation approach for quantifying the spatial distribution of Gurken, a TGFalpha-like EGFR ligand that acts as a morphogen in Drosophila oogenesis. Modeling of Gurken/EGFR system shows that the shape of the Gurken gradient is controlled by a single dimensionless parameter, the Thiele modulus, which reflects the relative importance of ligand diffusion and degradation. By combining the model with genetic alterations of EGFR levels, we have estimated the value of the Thiele modulus in the wild-type egg chamber. This provides a direct characterization of the shape of the Gurken gradient and demonstrates how parameter estimation techniques can be used to quantify morphogen gradients in development.     

Pattern formation by receptor tyrosine kinases: analysis of the Gurken gradient in Drosophila oogenesis

Spatial patterns of cell differentiation in developing tissues can be controlled by receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling gradients, which may form when locally secreted ligands activate uniformly expressed receptors. Graded activation of RTKs can span multiple cell diameters, giving rise to spatiotemporal patterns of signaling through the Extracellular Signal Regulated/Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (ERK/MAPK), which connects receptor activation to multiple aspects of tissue morphogenesis. This general mechanism has been identified in numerous developmental contexts, from body axis specification in insects to patterning of the mammalian neocortex. We review recent quantitative studies of this mechanism in Drosophila oogenesis, an established genetic model of signaling through the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), a highly conserved RTK.     

Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis

The genes okra and spindle-B act during meiosis in Drosophila to repair double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) associated with meiotic recombination. Unexpectedly, mutations in these genes cause dorsoventral patterning defects during oogenesis. These defects result from a failure to accumulate Gurken protein, which is required to initiate dorsoventral patterning during oogenesis. Here we find that the block in Gurken accumulation in the oocyte cytoplasm reflects activation of a meiotic checkpoint in response to the persistence of DSBs in the nucleus. We also show that Vasa is a target of this meiotic checkpoint, and so may mediate the checkpoint-dependent translational regulation of Gurken.     

Local Gurken signaling and dynamic MAPK activation during Drosophila oogenesis.

During Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis Gurken, a TGF-alpha like protein localized close to the oocyte nucleus, activates the MAPK cascade via the Drosophila EGF receptor (DER). Activation of this pathway induces different cell fates in the overlying follicular epithelium, specifying the two dorsolaterally positioned respiratory appendages and the dorsalmost cells separating them. Signal-associated internalization of Gurken protein into follicle cells demonstrates that the Gurken signal is spatially restricted and of constant intensity during mid-oogenesis. At the same time MAPK activation evolves in a spatially and temporally dynamic way and resolves into a complex pattern that presages the position of the appendages. Therefore, different dorsal follicle cell fates are not determined by a Gurken morphogen gradient. Instead they are specified by secondary signal amplification and refinement processes that integrate the Gurken signal with positive and negative feedback mechanisms generated by target genes of the DER pathway.     

Axis formation during Drosophila oogenesis.

Recent advances shed light on the cellular processes that cooperate during oogenesis to produce a fully patterned egg, containing all the maternal information required for embryonic development. Progress has been made in defining the early steps in oocyte specification and it has been shown that progression of oogenesis is controlled by a meiotic checkpoint and requires active maintenance of the oocyte cell fate. The function of Gurken signalling in patterning the dorsal-ventral axis later in oogenesis is better understood. Anterior-posterior patterning of the embryo requires activities of bicoid and oskar mRNAs, localised within the oocyte. A microtubule motor, Kinesin, is directly implicated in localisation of oskar mRNA to the posterior pole of the oocyte.     

Genetic and developmental analyses of chaetae pattern formation in Drosophila tergites

Summary The role of the achaete-scute complex and extramacrochaetae, Notch, Delta, Enhancer of split and Hairless genes in chaeta patterning in Drosophila tergites was studied in genetic mosaics and in mutant combinations. The mutant phenotypes of different alleles of each gene can be ordered in characteristic topographical seriations. These seriations are related to the pattern of proliferation of histoblasts and the time of singularization of sensory organ mother cells from surrounding epidermal cells. Genetic mosaics of lethal alleles show that these genes are fundamentally involved in this singularization and subsequent differentiation. The study of mutant combinations of alleles of these genes reveals specific relationships of epistasis and synergism between them. The results suggest that spatial and temporal variations in achaete-scute complex functional products in cells, modulated by the activity of other genes involved in signal transduction, define the patterned differentiation of sensory organs in tergites. Offprint requests to: A. García-Bellido     

Mechanism of activation of the Drosophila EGF Receptor by the TGFalpha ligand Gurken during oogenesis.

We have analyzed the mechanism of activation of the Epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) by the transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha-like molecule, Gurken (Grk). Grk is expressed in the oocyte and activates the Egfr in the surrounding follicle cells during oogenesis. We show that expression of either a membrane bound form of Grk (mbGrk), or a secreted form of Grk (secGrk), in either the follicle cells or in the germline, activates the Egfr. In tissue culture cells, both forms can bind to the Egfr; however, only the soluble form can trigger Egfr signaling, which is consistent with the observed cleavage of Grk in vivo. We find that the two transmembrane proteins Star and Brho potentiate the activity of mbGrk. These two proteins collaborate to promote an activating proteolytic cleavage and release of Grk. After cleavage, the extracellular domain of Grk is secreted from the oocyte to activate the Egfr in the follicular epithelium.     

The egg came first, of course! Anterior-posterior pattern formation in Drosophila embryogenesis and oogenesis

The anterior-posterior body pattern of the Drosophila embryo is initiated through the action of maternal gene products. In particular, three groups of maternally acting genes (the anterior, posterior and terminal groups) have been shown to direct the synthesis and spatial restriction of the three major organizing activities in the egg. The initial spatial localizations of the maternal organizing activities are established during oogenesis. After fertilization these activities regulate zygotic gene activity along the anterior-posterior axis of the egg.     

Lie Group Analysis of the Photo-Induced Fluorescence of Drosophila Oogenesis with the Asymmetrically Localized Gurken Protein

Lie group analysis of the photo-induced fluorescence of Drosophila oogenesis with the asymmetrically localized Gurken protein has been performed systematically to assess the roles of ligand-receptor complexes in follicle cells. The (2×2) matrix representations resulting from the polarized tissue spectra were employed to characterize the asymmetrical Gurken distributions. It was found that the fluorescence of the wild-type egg shows the Lie point symmetry X₂₃ at early stages of oogenesis. However, due to the morphogen regulation by intracellular proteins and extracellular proteins, the fluorescence of the embryogenesis with asymmetrically localized Gurken expansions exhibits specific symmetry features: Lie point symmetry Z₁ and Lie point symmetry X₁. The novel approach developed herein was successfully used to validate that the invariant-theoretical characterizations are consonant with the observed asymmetric fluctuations during early embryological development.     

Activation of a meiotic checkpoint during Drosophila oogenesis regulates the translation of Gurken through Chk2/Mnk

BACKGROUND: During Drosophila oogenesis, unrepaired double-strand DNA breaks activate a mei-41-dependent meiotic checkpoint, which couples the progression through meiosis to specific developmental processes. This checkpoint affects the accumulation of Gurken protein, a transforming growth factor alpha-like signaling molecule, as well as the morphology of the oocyte nucleus. However, the components of this checkpoint in flies have not been completely elucidated. RESULTS: We show that a mutation in the Drosophila Chk2 homolog (DmChk2/Mnk) suppresses the defects in the translation of gurken mRNA and also the defects in oocyte nuclear morphology. We also found that DmChk2 is phosphorylated in a mei-41-dependent pathway. Analysis of the meiotic cell cycle progression shows that the Drosophila Chk2 homolog is not required during early meiotic prophase, as has been observed for Chk2 in C. elegans. We demonstrate that the activation of the meiotic checkpoint affects Dwee1 localization and is associated with DmChk2-dependent posttranslational modification of Dwee1. We suggest that Dwee1 has a role in the meiotic checkpoint that regulates the meiotic cell cycle, but not the translation of gurken mRNA. In addition, we found that p53 and mus304, the Drosophila ATR-IP homolog, are not required for the patterning defects caused by the meiotic DNA repair mutations. CONCLUSIONS: DmChk2 is a transducer of the meiotic checkpoint in flies that is activated by unrepaired double-strand DNA breaks. Activation of DmChk2 in this specific checkpoint affects a cell cycle regulator as well as mRNA translation.     

Erratum: Proximal-distal pattern formation in Drosophila: cell autonomous requirement for Distal-less gene activity in limb development

[This corrects the article on p. 2045 in vol. 8.].     

Prostaglandins temporally regulate cytoplasmic actin bundle formation during Drosophila oogenesis

Prostaglandins (PGs)—lipid signals produced downstream of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes—regulate actin dynamics in cell culture and platelets, but their roles during development are largely unknown. Here we define a new role for Pxt, the Drosophila COX-like enzyme, in regulating the actin cytoskeleton—temporal restriction of actin remodeling during oogenesis. PGs are required for actin filament bundle formation during stage 10B (S10B). In addition, loss of Pxt results in extensive early actin remodeling, including actin filaments and aggregates, within the posterior nurse cells of S9 follicles; wild-type follicles exhibit similar structures at a low frequency. Hu li tai shao (Hts-RC) and Villin (Quail), an actin bundler, localize to all early actin structures, whereas Enabled (Ena), an actin elongation factor, preferentially localizes to those in pxt mutants. Reduced Ena levels strongly suppress early actin remodeling in pxt mutants. Furthermore, loss of Pxt results in reduced Ena localization to the sites of bundle formation during S10B. Together these data lead to a model in which PGs temporally regulate actin remodeling during Drosophila oogenesis by controlling Ena localization/activity, such that in S9, PG signaling inhibits, whereas at S10B, it promotes Ena-dependent actin remodeling.     

Drosophila oogenesis: versatile spn doctors

Recent work on Drosophila oogenesis has uncovered connections between cell-cycle checkpoints and pattern formation. Genes of the spindle class, which encode double-strand break repair enzymes and RNA helicases, affect oocyte polarity and the decision whether to differentiate as an oocyte or a nurse cell.     

Mitochondrial development during Drosophila oogenesis: distribution,density and in situ RNA hybridizations

The changes in distribution and density of mitochondria and the level of mitochondrial RNA during Drosophila oogenesis were studied simultaneously in the 3 cell types ie follicle cells, nurse cells and oocyte, making up the egg chamber. Up to stage 6, mitochondrial density (mitochondrial and cellular areas ratio) was elevated and increased similarly in both follicle and nurse cells. Thereafter the mitochondrial density of follicle cells continued to increase and that of the nurse cells declined markedly while the nurse cell mitochondria assembled in dense groups and decreased in size. This can be related to a transfer of nurse cell cytoplasm, including mitochondria, to the oocyte. In the oocyte from stage 4 to stage 7 we observed a significant decrease of the mitochondrial density due to the absence of mitochondrial biogenesis. Then the cytoplasm transfer caused mitochondrial density to increase up to the level found in the nurse cells at the end of oogenesis. The mature oocyte contains enough mitochondria to supply 15 000 somatic cells. Our results strongly suggest that the variations in size, distribution and density of mitochondria relate to the particular energetic requirements of the different cell types during the first half of oogenesis. Later they relate to the developmental requirements of the nurse cells and the oocyte, in particular the storage of mitochondria in the oocyte. The level of mitochondrial RNA was studied through in situ hybridization. Throughout oogenesis the follicle and nurse cell RNA evolved similarly. Up to stage 9, there was no change in RNA densities in these cells, suggesting a correlation with the cell volume and/or the nuclear DNA content. Thereafter the cellular RNA concentration declined rapidly. In the oocyte the RNA concentration evolved differently especially from stage 10 to the end, the RNA density being stabilized. This can be related to the injection of nurse cell mitochondria, followed by their assignment to reserve status. Our results suggest that the mt RNA density is under extramitochondrial control mechanisms.     

Systems-level questions in Drosophila oogenesis

This paper describes computational and experimental work on pattern formation in Drosophila egg development (oogenesis), an established experimental model for studying cell fate diversification in developing tissues. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key regulator of pattern formation and morphogenesis in Drosophila oogenesis. EGFR signalling in oogenesis can be genetically manipulated and monitored at many levels, leading to large sets of heterogeneous data that enable the formulation of increasingly quantitative models of pattern formation in these systems.     

DNA repair in Drosophila oogenesis

In experiments with females of lines with an impaired DNA repair systems mei-9 (impaired excision repair) and mei-41 (impaired postreplicative repair), a method of successive irradiation by X-rays (1000 R) and hyperthermia (+37 degrees C) action was used for the purpose of defining a moment when DNA repair takes place in oogenesis. Repair in mature mei-41 oocytes judged of by synergism effect of the both factors acting was ascertained to take place right after X-raying (prior to DNA replication) and being absent at the fertilization period (at the time of or after DNA replication). DNA repair in mei-9 females was not registered in both cases. On the basis of these facts, it is suggested that coordination of various DNA repair systems is necessary for damaged chromosomes to be repaired. It is also concluded that the method used can be regarded as an effective technique in the study of mutation process.     

Divide and conquer: pattern formation in Drosophila embryonic epidermis

The pattern of differentiated cell types within tissues and organs is often established by organizers, the localized sources of secreted ligands. Although the mechanisms underlying organizer function have been extensively studied, only in a few cases is it clear how an organizer ultimately controls each individual cell's fate across a field of progenitor cells. One of these cases involves the establishment of a precise pattern of cell differentiation across the embryonic epidermis in Drosophila. Here, we review several recent reports that help to elucidate the regulatory principles used to control this pattern. Because organizers are conserved, the same fundamental principles might operate in other organizers.     

Mitochondrial development during Drosophila oogenesis: distribution, density and in situ RNA hybridizations.

The changes in distribution and density of mitochondria and the level of mitochondrial RNA during Drosophila oogenesis were studied simultaneously in the 3 cell types ie follicle cells, nurse cells and oocyte, making up the egg chamber. Up to stage 6, mitochondrial density (mitochondrial and cellular areas ratio) was elevated and increased similarly in both follicle and nurse cells. Thereafter the mitochondrial density of follicle cells continued to increase and that of the nurse cells declined markedly while the nurse cell mitochondria assembled in dense groups and decreased in size. This can be related to a transfer of nurse cell cytoplasm, including mitochondria, to the oocyte. In the oocyte from stage 4 to stage 7 we observed a significant decrease of the mitochondrial density due to the absence of mitochondrial biogenesis. Then the cytoplasm transfer caused mitochondrial density to increase up to the level found in the nurse cells at the end of oogenesis. The mature oocyte contains enough mitochondria to supply 15,000 somatic cells. Our results strongly suggest that the variations in size, distribution and density of mitochondria relate to the particular energetic requirements of the different cell types during the first half of oogenesis. Later they relate to the developmental requirements of the nurse cells and the oocyte, in particular the storage of mitochondria in the oocyte. The level of mitochondrial RNA was studied through in situ hybridization. Throughout oogenesis the follicle and nurse cell RNA evolved similarly. Up to stage 9, there was no change in RNA densities in these cells, suggesting a correlation with the cell volume and/or the nuclear DNA content. Thereafter the cellular RNA concentration declined rapidly. In the oocyte the RNA concentration evolved differently especially from stage 10 to the end, the RNA density being stabilized. This can be related to the injection of nurse cell mitochondria, followed by their assignment to reserve status. Our results suggest that the mt RNA density is under extramitochondrial control mechanisms.