γ‐Secretase Inhibition Induces Muscle Hypertrophy in a Notch‐Independent Mechanism

A wide variety of cellular processes and signaling events are regulated by the proteolytic enzyme γ‐secretase. Notch‐1 is one of the substrates of γ‐secretase and its role in the regulation of muscle differentiation has been well described. Importantly, besides Notch‐1, a number of proteins have been identified to undergo proteolysis by γ‐secretase. To date, the specific role of γ‐secretase during embryonic skeletal muscle differentiation has not been studied. Therefore, we address this question through the analysis of in vitro grown chick myogenic cells during the formation of multinucleated myotubes. The γ‐secretase inhibitor DAPT (N‐N[‐(3,5‐Difluorophenacetyl‐l ‐alanyl)]‐S‐328 phenylglycine‐t‐butyl‐ester) induces muscle hypertrophy. Knockdown of Notch‐1 using siRNA specific to chick shows no significant effect in myotube size, suggesting that γ‐secretase‐dependent effects on muscle hypertrophy in chick myogenic cells are Notch‐1‐independent. We also investigate the effects of γ‐secretase inhibition in the whole proteomic profile of chick myogenic cells. We identified 276 differentially expressed proteins from Label‐free proteomic approach. Data overview of interaction network obtained from STRING show that after γ‐secretase inhibition cells exhibited imbalance in protein metabolism, cytoskeleton/adhesion, and Sonic Hedgehog signaling. The collection of these results provides new insights into the role of γ‐secretase in skeletal muscle hypertrophy.     

Specificity of presenilin‐1‐ and presenilin‐2‐dependent γ‐secretases towards substrate processing

The two presenilin‐1 (PS1) and presenilin‐2 (PS2) homologs are the catalytic core of the γ‐secretase complex, which has a major role in cell fate decision and Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Understanding the precise contribution of PS1‐ and PS2‐dependent γ‐secretases to the production of β‐amyloid peptide (Aβ) from amyloid precursor protein (APP) remains an important challenge to design molecules efficiently modulating Aβ release without affecting the processing of other γ‐secretase substrates. To that end, we studied PS1‐ and PS2‐dependent substrate processing in murine cells lacking presenilins (PSs) (PS1KO, PS2KO or PS1‐PS2 double‐KO noted PSdKO) or stably re‐expressing human PS1 or PS2 in an endogenous PS‐null (PSdKO) background. We characterized the processing of APP and Notch on both endogenous and exogenous substrates, and we investigated the effect of pharmacological inhibitors targeting the PSs activity (DAPT and L‐685,458). We found that murine PS1 γ‐secretase plays a predominant role in APP and Notch processing when compared to murine PS2 γ‐secretase. The inhibitors blocked more efficiently murine PS2‐ than murine PS1‐dependent processing. Human PSs, especially human PS1, expression in a PS‐null background efficiently restored APP and Notch processing. Strikingly, and contrary to the results obtained on murine PSs, pharmacological inhibitors appear to preferentially target human PS1‐ than human PS2‐dependent γ‐secretase activity.     

MUC1 is a substrate for γ‐secretase

Understanding the underlying mechanisms by which a normal cell avoids the oncogenic potential of MUC1 signaling requires further definition of the pathways by which the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail is processed in both normal and tumor‐derived cells. In the present study we describe the processing pathway initiated by TACE/ADAM17 cleavage of MUC1. Utilizing the human uterine epithelial cell line, HES, derived from normal endometrium, we show that endogenous full length MUC1 undergoes regulated intramembranous proteolysis mediated by presenillin‐dependent γ‐secretase. Cytokine‐stimulated HES cells exposed to γ‐secretase inhibitors accumulated a membrane‐associated 15 kDa fragment of the MUC1 C‐terminal subunit (CTF15). Inhibitors of TACE/ADAM17‐mediated shedding inhibited accumulation of MUC1‐CTF15 and MUC1 ectodomain release to a similar extent consistent with MUC1‐CTF15 being a product of TACE/ADAM17 action. Reduction of catalytically active γ‐secretase complex by nicastrin siRNA treatment also resulted in CTF15 accumulation. Furthermore, mature nicastrin, the substrate receptor for γ‐secretase, co‐immunoprecipitated with CTF15 in the presence of γ‐secretase inhibitors indicating the formation of CTF15: nicastrin complexes. MUC1‐CTF15 accumulation in response to γ‐secretase inhibition was demonstrated in both normal and tumor‐derived cells from humans and mice indicating that this processing pathway exists in many cell contexts. We did not detect products of MUC1 cleavage by γ‐secretase in the presence of various proteasomal inhibitors indicating that subsequent degradation is either non‐proteasomal or extremely efficient. We suggest that this efficient pathway attenuates potential signaling mediated by cytoplasmic tail fragments. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 802–815, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The stress response neuropeptide CRF increases amyloid‐β production by regulating γ‐secretase activity

The biological underpinnings linking stress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk are poorly understood. We investigated how corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), a critical stress response mediator, influences amyloid‐β (Aβ) production. In cells, CRF treatment increases Aβ production and triggers CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) and γ‐secretase internalization. Co‐immunoprecipitation studies establish that γ‐secretase associates with CRFR1; this is mediated by β‐arrestin binding motifs. Additionally, CRFR1 and γ‐secretase co‐localize in lipid raft fractions, with increased γ‐secretase accumulation upon CRF treatment. CRF treatment also increases γ‐secretase activity in vitro, revealing a second, receptor‐independent mechanism of action. CRF is the first endogenous neuropeptide that can be shown to directly modulate γ‐secretase activity. Unexpectedly, CRFR1 antagonists also increased Aβ. These data collectively link CRF to increased Aβ through γ‐secretase and provide mechanistic insight into how stress may increase AD risk. They also suggest that direct targeting of CRF might be necessary to effectively modulate this pathway for therapeutic benefit in AD, as CRFR1 antagonists increase Aβ and in some cases preferentially increase Aβ42 via complex effects on γ‐secretase.     

Masking of Transmembrane‐Based Retention Signals Controls ER Export of γ‐Secretase

γ‐Secretase is critically involved in the Notch pathway and in Alzheimer's disease. The four subunits of γ‐secretase assemble in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and unassembled subunits are retained/retrieved to the ER by specific signals. We here describe a novel ER‐retention/retrieval signal in the transmembrane domain (TMD) 4 of presenilin 1, a subunit of γ‐secretase. TMD4 also is essential for complex formation, conferring a dual role for this domain. Likewise, TMD1 of Pen2 is bifunctional as well. It carries an ER‐retention/retrieval signal and is important for complex assembly by binding to TMD4. The two TMDs directly interact with each other and mask their respective ER‐retention/retrieval signals, allowing surface transport of reporter proteins. Our data suggest a model how assembly of Pen2 into the nascent γ‐secretase complex could mask TMD‐based ER‐retention/retrieval signals to allow plasma membrane transport of fully assembled γ‐secretase.     

Affinity pulldown of γ‐secretase and associated proteins from human and rat brain

γ‐Secretase is a transmembrane protease complex responsible for the processing of a multitude of type 1 transmembrane proteins, including amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Notch. A functional complex is dependent on the assembly of four proteins: presenilin (PS), nicastrin, Aph‐1 and Pen‐2. Little is known about how the substrates are selected by γ‐secretase, but it has been suggested that γ‐secretase associated proteins (GSAPs) could be of importance. For instance, it was recently reported from studies in cell lines that TMP21, a transmembrane protein involved in trafficking, binds to γ‐secretase and regulates the processing of APP‐derived substrates without affecting Notch cleavage. Here, we present an efficient and selective method for purification and analysis of γ‐secretase and GSAPs. Microsomal membranes were prepared from rat or human brain and incubated with a γ‐secretase inhibitor coupled to biotin via a long linker and a S‐S bridge. After pulldown using streptavidin beads, bound proteins were eluted under reducing conditions and digested by trypsin. The tryptic peptides were subjected to LC‐MS/MS analysis, and proteins were identified by sequence data from MS/MS spectra. All of the known γ‐secretase components were identified. Interestingly, TMP21 and the PS associated protein syntaxin1 were associated to γ‐secretase in rat brain. We suggest that the present method can be used for further studies on the composition of the γ‐secretase complex.     

Calcium/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II regulates notch‐1 signaling in prostate cancer cells

Notch signaling is associated with prostate osteoblastic bone metastases and calcium/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is associated with osteoblastogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Here we show that prostate cancer cell lines C4‐2B and PC3, both derived from bone metastases and express Notch‐1, have all four isoforms of CaMKII (α, β, γ, δ). In contrast, prostate cancer cell lines LNcaP and DU145, which are not derived from bone metastases and lack the Notch‐1 receptor, both lack the alpha isoform of CaMKII. In addition, DU145 cells also lack the β‐isoform. In C4‐2B cells, inhibition of CaMKII by KN93 or γ‐secretase by L‐685,458 inhibited the formation of the cleaved form of Notch‐1 thus inhibiting Notch signaling. KN93 inhibited down stream Notch‐1 signaling including Hes‐1 gene expression, Hes‐1 promoter activity, and c‐Myc expression. In addition, both KN93 and L‐685,458 inhibited proliferation and Matrigel invasion by C4‐2B cells. The activity of γ‐secretase was unaffected by KN93 but markedly inhibited by L‐685,458. Inhibition of the expression of α, β, or γ‐isoform by siRNA did not affect Hes‐1 gene expression, however when expression of one isoform was inhibited by siRNA, there were compensatory changes in the expression of the other isoforms. Over‐expression of CaMKII‐α increased Hes‐1 expression, consistent with Notch‐1 signaling being at least partially dependent upon CaMKII. This unique crosstalk between CaMKII and Notch‐1 pathways provides new insight into Notch signaling and potentially provides new targets for pharmacotherapeutics. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 25–32, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Membrane dynamics of γ‐secretase with the anterior pharynx‐defective 1B subunit

The four‐subunit protease complex γ‐secretase cleaves many single‐pass transmembrane (TM) substrates, including Notch and β‐amyloid precursor protein to generate amyloid‐β (Aβ), central to Alzheimer's disease. Two of the subunits anterior pharynx‐defective 1 (APH‐1) and presenilin (PS) exist in two homologous forms APH1‐A and APH1‐B, and PS1 and PS2. The consequences of these variations are poorly understood and could affect Aβ production and γ‐secretase medicine. Here, we developed the first complete structural model of the APH‐1B subunit using the published cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) structures of APH1‐A (Protein Data Bank: 5FN2, 5A63, and 6IYC). We then performed all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations at 303 K in a realistic bilayer system to understand both APH‐1B alone and in γ‐secretase without and with substrate C83‐bound. We show that APH‐1B adopts a 7TM topology with a water channel topology similar to APH‐1A. We demonstrate direct transport of water through this channel, mainly via Glu84, Arg87, His170, and His196. The apo and holo states closely resemble the experimental cryo‐EM structures with APH‐1A, however with subtle differences: The substrate‐bound APH‐1B γ‐secretase was quite stable, but some TM helices of PS1 and APH‐1B rearranged in the membrane consistent with the disorder seen in the cryo‐EM data. This produces different accessibility of water molecules for the catalytic aspartates of PS1, critical for Aβ production. In particular, we find that the typical distance between the catalytic aspartates of PS1 and the C83 cleavage sites are shorter in APH‐1B, that is, it represents a more closed state, due to interactions with the C‐terminal fragment of PS1. Our structural‐dynamic model of APH‐1B alone and in γ‐secretase suggests generally similar topology but some notable differences in water accessibility which may be relevant to the protein's existence in two forms and their specific function and location.     

Aph‐1 is required to regulate Presenilin‐mediated γ‐secretase activity and cell survival in Drosophila wing development

Aph‐1 is a multipass transmembrane protein and an essential component of the Presenilin (Psn)‐mediated γ‐secretase complex. During protease assembly, Aph‐1 stabilizes the newly synthesized Psn holoprotein to facilitate generation of the active form of Psn, which is a Psn‐NTF/Psn‐CTF heterodimer produced through a Presenilinase‐initiated endoproteolytic cleavage of the Psn holoprotein. Although it is clear that loss of Aph‐1 activity leads to failure of Psn heterodimer formation, little is understood about whether Aph‐1 plays a role in regulating γ‐secretase activity in addition to assisting Psn maturation. Using various modified Psn forms that do not require endoproteolysis or have a large deletion of the cytosolic loop, we show that in Drosophila Aph‐1 is still required for γ‐secretase activity independent of its role in promoting Psn endoproteolysis. In addition, our results indicate that Aph‐1 is required to promote cell survival in the wing imaginal disc; aph‐1 mutant cells are lost either through cell death or because of a defect in cell proliferation. This function of Aph‐1 is independent of its role in regulating γ‐secretase activity, but possibly involves downregulating the activity of uncleaved Psn holoprotein. genesis 47:169–174, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

γ‐secretase inhibitor DAPT mitigates cisplatin‐induced acute kidney injury by suppressing Notch1 signaling

Organ toxicity, including kidney injury, limits the use of cisplatin for the treatment of multiple human cancers. Hence, interventions to alleviate cisplatin‐induced nephropathy are of benefit to cancer patients. Recent studies have demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway enhances cisplatin efficacy against several cancer cells. However, whether augmentation of the anti‐cancer effect of cisplatin by Notch inhibition comes at the cost of increased kidney injury is unclear. We show here that treatment of mice with cisplatin resulted in a significant increase in Notch ligand Delta‐like 1 (Dll1) and Notch1 intracellular domain (N1ICD) protein expression levels in the kidneys. N‐[N‐(3,5‐difluorophenacetyl)‐L‐alanyl]‐S‐phenylglycine t‐butyl ester (DAPT), a γ‐secretase inhibitor reversed cisplatin‐induced increase in renal N1ICD expression and plasma or urinary levels of predictive biomarkers of acute kidney injury (AKI). DAPT also mitigated cisplatin‐induced tubular injury and reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Real‐time multiphoton microscopy revealed marked necrosis and peritubular vascular dysfunction in the kidneys of cisplatin‐treated mice which were abrogated by DAPT. Cisplatin‐induced Dll1/Notch1 signaling was recapitulated in a human proximal tubule epithelial cell line (HK‐2). siRNA‐mediated Dll1 knockdown and DAPT attenuated cisplatin‐induced Notch1 cleavage and cytotoxicity in HK‐2 cells. These data suggest that Dll1‐mediated Notch1 signaling contributes to cisplatin‐induced AKI. Hence, the Notch signaling pathway could be a potential therapeutic target to alleviate renal complications associated with cisplatin chemotherapy.     

α‐secretase mediated conversion of the amyloid precursor protein derived membrane stub C99 to C83 limits Aβ generation

The Swedish mutation within the amyloid precursor protein (APP) causes early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease due to increased cleavage of APP by BACE1. While β‐secretase shedding of Swedish APP (APPswe) largely results from an activity localized in the late secretory pathway, cleavage of wild‐type APP occurs mainly in endocytic compartments. However, we show that liberation of Aβ from APPswe is still dependent on functional internalization from the cell surface. Inspite the unchanged overall β‐secretase cleaved soluble APP released from APP_swe secretion, mutations of the APPswe internalization motif strongly reduced C99 levels and substantially decreased Aβ secretion. We point out that α‐secretase activity‐mediated conversion of C99 to C83 is the main cause of this Aβ reduction. Furthermore, we demonstrate that α‐secretase cleavage of C99 even contributes to the reduction of Aβ secretion of internalization deficient wild‐type APP. Therefore, inhibition of α‐secretase cleavage increased Aβ secretion through diminished conversion of C99 to C83 in APP695, APP695swe or C99 expressing cells.     

The functions of auxilin and Rab11 in Drosophila suggest that the fundamental role of ligand endocytosis in notch signaling cells is not recycling

Notch signaling requires ligand internalization by the signal sending cells. Two endocytic proteins, epsin and auxilin, are essential for ligand internalization and signaling. Epsin promotes clathrin-coated vesicle formation, and auxilin uncoats clathrin from newly internalized vesicles. Two hypotheses have been advanced to explain the requirement for ligand endocytosis. One idea is that after ligand/receptor binding, ligand endocytosis leads to receptor activation by pulling on the receptor, which either exposes a cleavage site on the extracellular domain, or dissociates two receptor subunits. Alternatively, ligand internalization prior to receptor binding, followed by trafficking through an endosomal pathway and recycling to the plasma membrane may enable ligand activation. Activation could mean ligand modification or ligand transcytosis to a membrane environment conducive to signaling. A key piece of evidence supporting the recycling model is the requirement in signaling cells for Rab11, which encodes a GTPase critical for endosomal recycling. Here, we use Drosophila Rab11 and auxilin mutants to test the ligand recycling hypothesis. First, we find that Rab11 is dispensable for several Notch signaling events in the eye disc. Second, we find that Drosophila female germline cells, the one cell type known to signal without clathrin, also do not require auxilin to signal. Third, we find that much of the requirement for auxilin in Notch signaling was bypassed by overexpression of both clathrin heavy chain and epsin. Thus, the main role of auxilin in Notch signaling is not to produce uncoated ligand-containing vesicles, but to maintain the pool of free clathrin. Taken together, these results argue strongly that at least in some cell types, the primary function of Notch ligand endocytosis is not for ligand recycling.     

Important functional role of residue x of the presenilin GxGD protease active site motif for APP substrate cleavage specificity and substrate selectivity of γ‐secretase

γ‐Secretase plays a central role in the generation of the Alzheimer disease‐causing amyloid β‐peptide (Aβ) from the β‐amyloid precursor protein (APP) and is thus a major Alzheimer′s disease drug target. As several other γ‐secretase substrates including Notch1 and CD44 have crucial signaling functions, an understanding of the mechanism of substrate recognition and cleavage is key for the development of APP selective γ‐secretase‐targeting drugs. The γ‐secretase active site domain in its catalytic subunit presenilin (PS) 1 has been implicated in substrate recognition/docking and cleavage. Highly critical in this process is its GxGD active site motif, whose invariant glycine residues cannot be replaced without causing severe functional losses in substrate selection and/or cleavage efficiency. Here, we have investigated the contribution of the less well characterized residue x of the motif (L383 in PS1) to this function. Extensive mutational analysis showed that processing of APP was overall well‐tolerated over a wide range of hydrophobic and hydrophilic mutations. Interestingly, however, most L383 mutants gave rise to reduced levels of Aβ_37–39 species, and several increased the pathogenic Aβ_42/43 species. Several of the Aβ_42/43‐increasing mutants severely impaired the cleavages of Notch1 and CD44 substrates, which were not affected by any other L383 mutation. Our data thus establish an important, but compared with the glycine residues of the motif, overall less critical functional role for L383. We suggest that L383 and the flanking glycine residues form a spatial arrangement in PS1 that is critical for docking and/or cleavage of different γ‐secretase substrates.     

Fat facets and Liquid facets promote Delta endocytosis and Delta signaling in the signaling cells

Endocytosis modulates the Notch signaling pathway in both the signaling and receiving cells. One recent hypothesis is that endocytosis of the ligand Delta by the signaling cells is essential for Notch activation in the receiving cells. Here, we present evidence in strong support of this model. We show that in the developing Drosophila eye Fat facets (Faf), a deubiquitinating enzyme, and its substrate Liquid facets (Lqf), an endocytic epsin, promote Delta internalization and Delta signaling in the signaling cells. We demonstrate that while Lqf is necessary for three different Notch/Delta signaling events at the morphogenetic furrow, Faf is essential only for one: Delta signaling by photoreceptor precluster cells, which prevents recruitment of ectopic neurons. In addition, we show that the ubiquitin-ligase Neuralized (Neur), which ubiquitinates Delta, functions in the signaling cells with Faf and Lqf. The results presented bolster one model for Neur function in which Neur enhances Delta signaling by stimulating Delta internalization in the signaling cells. We propose that Faf plays a role similar to that of Neur in the Delta signaling cells. By deubiquitinating Lqf, which enhances the efficiency of Delta internalization, Faf stimulates Delta signaling.     

Identifying genes that interact with Drosophila presenilin and amyloid precursor protein

The γ‐secretase complex is involved in cleaving transmembrane proteins such as Notch and one of the genes targeted in Alzheimer's disease known as amyloid precursor protein (APP). Presenilins function within the catalytic core of γ‐secretase, and mutated forms of presenilins were identified as causative factors in familial Alzheimer's disease. Recent studies show that in addition to Notch and APP, numerous signal transduction pathways are modulated by presenilins, including intracellular calcium signaling. Thus, presenilins appear to have diverse roles. To further understand presenilin function, we searched for Presenilin‐interacting genes in Drosophila by performing a genetic modifier screen for enhancers and suppressors of Presenilin‐dependent Notch‐related phenotypes. We identified 177 modifiers, including known members of the Notch pathway and genes involved in intracellular calcium homeostasis. We further demonstrate that 53 of these modifiers genetically interacted with APP. Characterization of these genes may provide valuable insights into Presenilin function in development and disease. genesis 47:246–260, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Aging‐induced Akt activation involves in aging‐related pathologies and Aβ‐induced toxicity

Multicellular signals are altered in the processes of both aging and neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Similarities in behavioral and cellular functional changes suggest a common regulator between aging and AD that remains undetermined. Our genetics and behavioral approaches revealed the regulatory role of Akt in both aging and AD pathogenesis. In this study, we found that the activity of Akt is upregulated during aging through epidermal growth factor receptor activation by using the fruit fly as an in vivo model. Downregulation of Akt in neurons improved cell survival, locomotor activity, and starvation challenge in both aged and Aβ42‐expressing flies. Interestingly, increased cAMP levels attenuated both Akt activation‐induced early death and Aβ42‐induced learning deficit in flies. At the molecular level, overexpression of Akt promoted Notch cleavage, suggesting that Akt is an endogenous activity regulator of γ‐secretase. Taken together, this study revealed that Akt is involved in the aging process and Aβ toxicity, and manipulating Akt can restore both neuronal functions and improve behavioral activity during the processes of aging and AD pathogenesis.