生长素输出载体PIN家族研究进展

生长素极性运输调控植物的生长发育。生长素极性运输主要依赖3类转运蛋白: AUX/LAX、PIN和ABCB蛋白家族。生长素在细胞间流动的方向与PIN蛋白在细胞上的极性定位密切相关。PIN蛋白由1个中心亲水环和2个由中心亲水环隔开的疏水区组成。中心亲水环上含多个磷酸化位点,其为一些蛋白激酶的靶点。PIN蛋白受多方面调控,包...     

生长素输出载体蛋白PIN1在作物根和胚中的亚细胞定位

生长素输出载体在植物发育中起非常重要的作用.然而,生长素输出载体蛋白PIN1在农作物水稻、小麦、玉米和大豆的根和胚中的亚细胞定位尚不清楚.该研究首先分析了OsPIN1b和它的同源物的氨基酸序列特征,发现小麦(TaPIN1)、玉米(ZmPIN1b)和大豆(GmPIN1b)中的PIN1序列与水稻的OsPIN1b序列分别具有...     

拟南芥中PIN3生长素输出调节蛋白侧向再定位促成向性运动

20世纪 2 0年代提出的Ｃｈｏｌｏｄｎｙ＿Ｗｅｎｔ植物向性假说认为 ,植物的向性运动是由于生长素 (ａｕｘｉｎ)的侧向运输引起的。研究表明 ,可能存在一种特殊的运输系统来对生长素进行侧向再定位 ,引起差异生长 (ｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔｉａｌｇｒｏｗｔｈ) ,最终导致芽或根的弯曲。但 70多年来 ,一直没有从分子或细胞机理上得到证实。近年来 ,德国马普植物育种研究所Ｐａｌｍｅ研究小组从拟南芥ｐｉｎ＿1突变体中克隆出多个ＰＩＮ基因 ,它们能编码运输生长素的必须物质。现已证明 ,茎中ＰＩＮ1及根中ＰＩＮ2对生长素极性运输和向性运动起着关…     

PIN蛋白在生长素极性运输中的作用

PIN蛋白是生长素流出栽体,它在细胞中的不对称分布决定细胞间生长素流方向.PIN蛋白网络系统决定生长素的极性运输,为植物体各部位的细胞提供了特异的位置和方向信息.从细胞水平上介绍PIN蛋白在生长素极性运输中的作用及对PIN蛋白功能调节的研究进展.     

Rabdosinate调节生长素极性运输蛋白PIN1、PIN3和PIN4抑制拟南芥幼苗根生长

利用3种拟南芥生长素极性运输外运载体突变体及4种转基因株系研究了二萜rabdosinate抑制拟南芥幼苗主根及侧根生长的作用机制。结果显示,60~80 μmol·L^-1的rabdosinate显著抑制野生型拟南芥幼苗主根生长及侧根形成,而对突变体pin1、pin2和pin3主根未显示明显的抑制效应,对侧根的抑制减弱;发现rabdosinate （60~80 μmol·L^-1）引起生长素报告株系根尖DR5活性升高,并增加融合蛋白PIN1-GFP丰度以及减少PIN3-GFP和PIN4-GFP的丰度。推断rabdosinate可通过增加PIN1丰度促进了根部生长素向顶运输,而减少PIN3丰度降低根尖部生长素的横向转运,引起了生长素在根尖部的累积及生长素浓度梯度的改变,进而抑制幼苗主根生长及侧根发育。     

生长素运输载体

吲哚乙酸(IAA)对植物的生长发育起显著的调节作用。它在植物体内的传导、组织间的分布、细胞间的运输是决定其生物学效应的重要因素。本文对生长素运输载体的动力学特性、亚细胞定位、结构及功能等方面的研究做一简要总结,并对生长素运输的化学渗透模型的有关方面做一分析,以期有助于生长素运输机理的继续研究。     

生长素结合蛋白研究进展

生长素(auxin)是植物体内普遍存在的一类植物激素,它对植物的生长发育起着多方面的调节作用,如促进细胞伸长,诱导细胞分化,促进生根和单性果实(parthenocarpic fruit)的发育等,同时生长素还抑制芽的发生及果实的衰老。生长素作用机理的研究表明,生长素可以诱导一些特殊基因的快速表达,促进RNA和蛋白质的合成。因此,生长素可能是通过调节基因的表达来发挥作用。“酸生长理论”(acid growth theory)则认为,在细胞膜上存在着生长素的受体,生长素与之结合后激活了细胞质膜上的质子泵,破除了细胞壁纤维结构间的交织点,细胞壁的可塑性增加,从而使细胞伸长。尽管对“酸生长理论”一直存在争议,但植物体内存在生长素受体的证据在不断积累。70年代末,关于生长素受体的研究工作虽已全     

植物的生长素结合蛋白

就植物中分离出的多种生长素结合蛋白,及其在植物体内的分布、分子结构和在生长素信号转导中的有关作用的研究进展作了介绍.     

植物生长素的极性运输载体研究进展

生长素极性运输在植物生长发育中起重要的调控作用.植物细胞间的生长素极性运输主要通过生长素运输载体进行调控.该文对近年来有关生长素极性运输载体,包括输入载体AUX/LAX、输出载体PIN、尤其是新近发现的兼有输入和输出载体功能的MDR/PGP等蛋白家族,以及生长素极性运输中PIN与MDR/PGP蛋白间相互作用关系进行综述.     

快速分离纯化质膜蛋白的方法

ARapidMethodforIsoationandPurificationofMembraneProteinPEIZhen-Ming;TANGZhang-Cheng(ShanghaiInstituteofPlantPhysiology,TheChineseAcademyofSciences,Shanghai200032）质膜上存在质子泵、离子通道、载体、蛋白激酶、激素受体、其它一些受体等，因为这些蛋白与植物的信     

PIN Auxin Efflux Carrier Polarity Is Regulated by PINOID Kinase-Mediated Recruitment into GNOM-Independent Trafficking in Arabidopsis

The phytohormone auxin plays a major role in embryonic and postembryonic plant development. The temporal and spatial distribution of auxin largely depends on the subcellular polar localization of members of the PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin efflux carrier family. The Ser/Thr protein kinase PINOID (PID) catalyzes PIN phosphorylation and crucially contributes to the regulation of apical-basal PIN polarity. The GTP exchange factor on ADP-ribosylation factors (ARF-GEF), GNOM preferentially mediates PIN recycling at the basal side of the cell. Interference with GNOM activity leads to dynamic PIN transcytosis between different sides of the cell. Our genetic, pharmacological, and cell biological approaches illustrate that PID and GNOM influence PIN polarity and plant development in an antagonistic manner and that the PID-dependent PIN phosphorylation results in GNOM-independent polar PIN targeting. The data suggest that PID and the protein phosphatase 2A not only regulate the static PIN polarity, but also act antagonistically on the rate of GNOM-dependent polar PIN transcytosis. We propose a model that includes PID-dependent PIN phosphorylation at the plasma membrane and the subsequent sorting of PIN proteins to a GNOM-independent pathway for polarity alterations during developmental processes, such as lateral root formation and leaf vasculature development.     

Strigolactone Can Promote or Inhibit Shoot Branching by Triggering Rapid Depletion of the Auxin Efflux Protein PIN1 from the Plasma Membrane

Plants continuously extend their root and shoot systems through the action of meristems at their growing tips. By regulating which meristems are active, plants adjust their body plans to suit local environmental conditions. The transport network of the phytohormone auxin has been proposed to mediate this systemic growth coordination, due to its self-organising, environmentally sensitive properties. In particular, a positive feedback mechanism termed auxin transport canalization, which establishes auxin flow from active shoot meristems (auxin sources) to the roots (auxin sinks), has been proposed to mediate competition between shoot meristems and to balance shoot and root growth. Here we provide strong support for this hypothesis by demonstrating that a second hormone, strigolactone, regulates growth redistribution in the shoot by rapidly modulating auxin transport. A computational model in which strigolactone action is represented as an increase in the rate of removal of the auxin export protein, PIN1, from the plasma membrane can reproduce both the auxin transport and shoot branching phenotypes observed in various mutant combinations and strigolactone treatments, including the counterintuitive ability of strigolactones either to promote or inhibit shoot branching, depending on the auxin transport status of the plant. Consistent with this predicted mode of action, strigolactone signalling was found to trigger PIN1 depletion from the plasma membrane of xylem parenchyma cells in the stem. This effect could be detected within 10 minutes of strigolactone treatment and was independent of protein synthesis but dependent on clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking. Together these results support the hypothesis that growth across the plant shoot system is balanced by competition between shoot apices for a common auxin transport path to the root and that strigolactones regulate shoot branching by modulating this competition.     

Phosphorylation of Conserved PIN Motifs Directs Arabidopsis PIN1 Polarity and Auxin Transport

Polar cell-to-cell transport of auxin by plasma membrane–localized PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin efflux carriers generates auxin gradients that provide positional information for various plant developmental processes. The apical-basal polar localization of the PIN proteins that determines the direction of auxin flow is controlled by reversible phosphorylation of the PIN hydrophilic loop (PINHL). Here, we identified three evolutionarily conserved TPRXS(N/S) motifs within the PIN1HL and proved that the central Ser residues were phosphorylated by the PINOID (PID) kinase. Loss-of-phosphorylation PIN1:green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Ser to Ala) induced inflorescence defects, correlating with their basal localization in the shoot apex, and induced internalization of PIN1:GFP during embryogenesis, leading to strong embryo defects. Conversely, phosphomimic PIN1:GFP (Ser to Glu) showed apical localization in the shoot apex but did not rescue pin1 inflorescence defects. Both loss-of-phosphorylation and phosphomimic PIN1:GFP proteins were insensitive to PID overexpression. The basal localization of loss-of-phosphorylation PIN1:GFP increased auxin accumulation in the root tips, partially rescuing PID overexpression-induced root collapse. Collectively, our data indicate that reversible phosphorylation of the conserved Ser residues in the PIN1HL by PID (and possibly by other AGC kinases) is required and sufficient for proper PIN1 localization and is thus essential for generating the differential auxin distribution that directs plant development.     

Comparative Analysis of Techniques to Purify Plasma Membrane Proteins

The aim of this project was to identify the best method for the enrichment of plasma membrane (PM) proteins for proteomics experiments. Following tryptic digestion and extended liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry acquisitions, data were processed using MaxQuant and Gene Ontology (GO) terms used to determine protein subcellular localization. The following techniques were examined for the total number and percentage purity of PM proteins identified: (a) whole cell lysate (total number, 84–112; percentage purity, 9–13%); (b) crude membrane preparation (104–111; 17–20%); (c) biotinylation of surface proteins with N-hydroxysulfosuccinimydyl-S,S-biotin and streptavidin pulldown (78–115; 27–31%); (d) biotinylation of surface glycoproteins with biocytin hydrazide and streptavidin pulldown (41–54; 59–85%); or (e) biotinylation of surface glycoproteins with amino-oxy-biotin (which labels the sialylated fraction of PM glycoproteins) and streptavidin pulldown (120; 65%). A two- to threefold increase in the overall number of proteins identified was achieved by using stop and go extraction tip (StageTip)-based anion exchange (SAX) fractionation. Combining technique (e) with SAX fractionation increased the number of proteins identified to 281 (54%). Analysis of GO terms describing these proteins identified a large subset of proteins integral to the membrane with no subcellular assignment. These are likely to be of PM location and bring the total PM protein identifications to 364 (68%). This study suggests that selective biotinylation of the cell surface using amino-oxy-biotin in combination with SAX fractionation is a useful method for identification of sialylated PM proteins.