植物分类学于中药资源学的意义:《中国药典》植物药材基源物种科属范畴变动考证及学名规范化研究

药用植物是中药资源的主要组成部分,在中药材的使用过程中,利用植物分类学方法对药用植物进行鉴定、亲缘关系及演化规律研究,有助于中药资源的系统认知、合理开发利用以及科学保护.本文参考国内外权威植物名录数据库、植物分类系统,以及最新的分子系统研究成果,对2020年版《中国药典》(一部)收载的植物药材基源物种科属范畴变动进行了系统考证,并对相关物种的拉丁学名和中文名进行了梳理,旨在推动植物分类学与中药资源学进一步学科交叉,维持药典的科学性和先进性,促进中医药行业的科学发展与国际影响力的提升.     

线蚓科分类学研究进展

线蚓科隶属于环节动物门环带纲,迄今共记录32属650余种,是该纲的第二大科。它们广泛分布于土壤、海洋、淡水、河口和冰川等。其中,约2/3的线蚓科物种(近500种)为陆生种类,100余种仅分布在海洋中。尽管经历了200多年的探索,线蚓科仍然是认知最少的类群之一。尝试回顾人类对线蚓科环带动物分类学和系统发育学方面的认知历程和积累的知识体系,描述线蚓科关键的形态学分类特征以及线蚓科分类研究遇到的主要问题和障碍,展望了线蚓科分类学未来的研究方向。线蚓科的分类研究尚处于α分类阶段,体现在以物种探索为主和大量的已描述的物种需要验证等。而基于生物学物种概念(生殖隔离)的线蚓科物种探索,虽然有一些合理的逻辑解释,但缺乏严格的科学验证。线蚓科内多数属为复系,表明已建立的线蚓科分类系统仍然不能很好的反映线蚓科的自然进化历史。线蚓科分类面临的主要问题和障碍是未描述种类亟待发掘、已描述的物种需要验证、属/种的厘定以及现代属级概念的建立、DNA分类在线蚓科的应用和线蚓科内的系统发育关系研究亟待开展,以及物种探索的不平衡、经费和研究人才匮乏以及网络分类的缺失等。将分子学数据和系统发育物种概念纳入线蚓科的分类学研究,应该是线蚓科分类的一个方向。通过解读保守基因的信息,可以揭示线蚓科的祖先与它们生活的古环境长期斗争的历史,以及将优良的性状遗传给后代的过程和驱动力。而系统发育物种概念认为物种是拥有共同祖先的,物种仅能通过生殖隔离与系统发育重建一起加以验证。基于系统发育物种概念而构建的线蚓科分类系统,必将能真实的反映线蚓科内各分类单元的亲缘关系和进化轨迹。而将最新的线蚓科分类学知识传播于分类学知识的终端使用者,是线蚓分类学家的职责。这些知识将有助于提高人们对线蚓类在生态系统中功能的了解,如土壤有机质分解、养分矿化和健康评价以及评估气候变化等。     

基因组学时代的真菌分类学:机遇与挑战

真菌物种的形态特征有限,加之形态滞后和形态可塑性,仅靠外部形态、内部结构及生理生化指标,很难把握真菌的系统亲缘。应用DNA测序、基因组测序、比较基因组学及生物信息学等技术,研究人员可以快速识别真菌演化中出现的数量众多的单系支系,为建立各分类等级的新分类单元提供有力证据,为真菌分类学研究带来了新的希望和活力。自2000年以来,在真菌界至少发表了1新亚界、4新门、7新亚门、19新纲、9新亚纲、40余新目等高级分类单元。近3年来,我国发表了20余个真菌新属,其中绝大多数属的建立都有分子证据支持。可以预见,大量的新种、新属、新科乃至更高级分类单元将会在今后10年内持续发现和建立。这必将大大促进真菌分类学的发展,完善现有的真菌分类系统。我们应该顺势而上,利用我国丰富的真菌资源,为真菌分类学的发展做出应有贡献。与此同时,真菌分类学也面临着十分严峻的挑战。挑战主要来自3个方面,一是研究变得越来越综合,不但需要有相应的研究经费支持,而且要求从事该领域的研究人员技术更全面、知识更广博及知识更新速度更快捷;二是新物种描述进度偏慢,远远不能满足人们对物种认识和利用的日益增长的需要;三是研究人员亟需创新研究模式,以新技术、新思路、新机制来构建新的真菌分类学,加速新物种的发现和描述进度,最终为社会进步和科学发展服务。     

新世纪的中国昆虫系统学

对未来我国昆虫系统学在能力建设、物种编目、理论研究、技术创新和国际合作等方面提出一系列建议。在昆虫系统学能力建设方面,政府和科学家应该在生物分类学能力评估、基础硬件建设、各级生物标本馆中建立伙伴关系（包括标本采集、标本馆管理、 科学研究、 知识共享和标本与资料交换）等方面重点开展工作。在物种编目方面,我国的昆虫物种编目有赖于各级政府和机构继续关注标本的收集和保藏,继续启动一些考察项目,以满足发现和认识昆虫物种的实际需求。在物种水平上研究以往昆虫系统学家的工作,进行地区性和世界性的昆虫类群的订正更是非常必要的。在理论研究方面,我国昆虫系统应该在下列方面积极探索：物种概念、进化理论、比较生物学理论和高级分类系统研究。在技术创新方面,我国的昆虫系统学家应该在数据库与网络技术应用、图形图像处理技术、专家鉴定系统技术、分类性状分析技术、分子生物学技术、系统发育推断程序、信息统一管理技术和知识传播技术等方面进行深入研究,以满足昆虫系统学的发展需求。在国际合作方面,要进一步推动我国昆虫系统学研究机构加入生物分类学全球战略联盟、加入各种相关国际相关组织,要促进物种信息管理系统的建立与共享,要推动研究项目国际化。     

数量分析方法在种内变异研究中的运用

现代生物分类知识和进化理论的发展,已使越来越多的系统分类学家清醒地意识到:组成同一物种的不同个体或群体并非同一模式原封不动的拷贝,相反,在这些个体与个体之间、群体与群体之间,存在形形色色程度不同的形态变异。这些变异有些源自基因的重组或突变,有些则是环境诱导的产物。对这些形态变异进行研究,不仅有助于我们了解物种形成与进化的机制和途径,揭示各自然因素在物种进化中的作用;同时,对分类学而言,亦将有助     

菌物分类学研究中常见的物种概念

物种是生物多样性与分类学研究的基本单元, 物种识别是生物学研究的基本问题之一。物种的划分一直以来都没有一个明确统一的标准, 这使得分类学多少带有主观的色彩, 并经常被看作艺术而不完全是科学的研究。本文简要概述了菌物分类学研究中常见的3个物种概念, 即形态学种、生物学种和系统发育学种的背景和应用现状, 并通过实例讨论了这3个物种概念的特点及应用中存在的问题, 特别是各个物种概念之间的交错, 以期为菌物分类学研究和物种概念探讨提供参考。     

绿藻门小球藻科的分类学研究进展

小球藻科物种生境范围广,分布于全球各种淡水、海水及陆生环境中,是多种生态系统的重要组成部分,且以其重要的科学和应用价值成为研究热点。由于个体微小及较强的形态可塑性,小球藻科物种能供分辨的形态特征有限,其经典分类学研究和物种鉴定存在诸多困难。随着基于DNA序列的研究方法在分类学研究中的应用,小球藻科历经多次修订,物种组成发生了很大变化,目前,小球藻科包含约48个属258个种。该科分类仍存在许多悬而未决的问题,如有些属、种的分类地位存疑、分类单元的多系起源问题、一些新支系有待进行物种归类。本文系统总结了小球藻科分类学研究历史和现状,并对其中存在的问题及存疑类群进行阐述,探讨了基因组学数据测序情况及其在分类学上的应用前景,以期为小球藻科的系统分类研究和开发利用提供基础参考资料。     

植物种内形态变异的机制及其研究方法

一、引言现代生物分类知识和进化理论的发展,已使越来越多的系统分类学家清醒地意识到:组成同一物种的不同个体或居群并非同一模式原封不同的拷贝,相反,在这些个体和居群之间存在着各种形式和程度不同的形态变异。对这些形态变异进行研究,不仅有助于我们了解物种形成与进化的机制和途径,揭示各自然因素在物种进化中的作     

电泳方法在分类学上的应用——以酯酶分析区别萝卜螺属(Radix)三个种的初步研究

电泳技术是Tisslius于1937年用以区分血清蛋白经电流作用,在溶液中迁移的多组份的。此后二三十年,这一技术得到了迅速的发展。1963年前大部份的研究是阐述单一蛋白质的变异,现已用于分析同一生物的不同蛋白。这些多位点的研究,都适用于研究基因变异性和种群结构,国外于六十年代后期开始向分类学渗透,研究分类学中的问题。Avise于1964年根据电泳分析的材料,论述了它们在分类学研究上的价值,他认为,种间的生化差异对描述和鉴定不同物种有一定的参考意义,并可使同属物种比较容易地分辨出,而超     

京族药用红树林民族植物学知识及现状

京族是我国唯一的海洋民族,在长期与红树林为伴的生存环境中,积累了丰富的利用红树林植物的民族植物学知识。然而,这些知识至今仍不为外界所知。为掌握京族药用红树林民族植物学知识和现状,该研究采用民族植物学和植物分类学方法,调查京族药用红树林知识中的红树林植物种类,记录其具体药用用途,并分析其生存现状及其中包含的可持续利用红树林植物资源经验。结果表明:共记录到京族药用红树林植物15种隶属于10科,具体药用用途共49种。其中,20种已有报道,29种未见报道;通过京族对红树林药用知识认知程度和依赖程度的调查还表明,京族历史上依赖本民族草医的情形已经基本消失,对红树林医药的依赖性和需求性也在消失。最后,剖析了京族在药用红树林植物选择与采集中的可持续利用经验。该研究结果不仅补充和拓宽了红树林民间药物的利用知识,而且为红树植物资源的管理与可持续利用提供了新视角。     

中国大型真菌分类学公民科学计划1.0

公民科学是指公众在职业科学家的引导下参与从事科学研究.大型真菌是在生活史中能够形成肉眼明显可见子实体的一类真菌的统称,具有重要的经济价值和生态功能,需要在分类学研究认识其物种多样性的基础上加以开发利用.大型真菌与公众生活息息相关,因此公众有认识这些大型真菌种类的意愿.另一方面,大型真菌物种多样性极高,仅依靠为数不多的职...     

The taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survival

Background

Taxonomy or biological systematics is the basic scientific discipline of biology, postulating hypotheses of identity and relationships, on which all other natural sciences dealing with organisms relies. However, the scientific contributions of taxonomists have been largely neglected when using species names in scientific publications by not citing the authority on which they are based.

Discussion

Consequences of this neglect is reduced recognition of the importance of taxonomy, which in turn results in diminished funding, lower interest from journals in publishing taxonomic research, and a reduced number of young scientists entering the field. This has lead to the so-called taxonomic impediment at a time when biodiversity studies are of critical importance. Here we emphasize a practical and obvious solution to this dilemma. We propose that whenever a species name is used, the author(s) of the species hypothesis be included and the original literature source cited, including taxonomic revisions and identification literature - nothing more than what is done for every other hypothesis or assumption included in a scientific publication. In addition, we postulate that journals primarily publishing taxonomic studies should be indexed in ISI^SM.

Summary

The proposal outlined above would make visible the true contribution of taxonomists within the scientific community, and would provide a more accurate assessment for funding agencies impact and importance of taxonomy, and help in the recruitment of young scientists into the field, thus helping to alleviate the taxonomic impediment. In addition, it would also make much of the biological literature more robust by reducing or alleviating taxonomic uncertainty.     

A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology

Community ecology seeks to explain the number and relative abundance of coexisting species. Four research frontiers in community ecology are closely tied to research in systematics and taxonomy: the statistics of species richness estimators, global patterns of biodiversity, the influence of global climate change on community structure, and phylogenetic influences on community structure. The most pressing needs for taxonomic information in community ecology research are usable taxonomic keys, current nomenclature, species occurrence records and resolved phylogenies. These products can best be obtained from Internet-based phylogenetic and taxonomic resources, but the lack of trained professional systematists and taxonomists threatens this effort. Community ecologists will benefit most directly from research in systematics and taxonomy by making better use of resources in museums and herbaria, and by actively seeking training, information and collaborations with taxonomic specialists.     

中国兽类名录(2021版)

中国是全球兽类物种多样性最高的国家之一,掌握我国兽类物种多样性和分类地位是兽类学研究的基础前提,也是科学保护野生种群的前提。为厘清中国兽类的物种数量及分类地位等关键分类学信息,中国动物学会兽类学分会组织国内长期致力于兽类各类群分类的科学研究人员,在总结前人研究的基础上,根据最新的形态学和分子遗传学证据,综合现代兽类分类学家意见,经编委会充分讨论,形成了最新的中国兽类名录,包括我国现阶段兽类12目59科254属686种。该中国兽类名录使用基于系统发生关系的分类系统,并对物种有效性进行了充分慎重的确认和讨论。     

Taxonomy and environmental policy

In 1992, with the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro and the subsequent Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the world changed for the science of taxonomy. Many taxonomists appear not to have noticed this change, but it has significantly altered the political climate in which taxonomic research is undertaken. By the late 1990s it was clear that effective implementation of the CBD needed the participation of and funding for the taxonomic community. In this paper, I chart the rise of the Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI), review some of its goals and explore how it interacts with the CBD. The interactions of the GTI with the Global Environment Facility, a potential funding body, are explored, as are the possible synergies between the GTI and the many other global initiatives linking to taxonomy. Finally, I explore some of the challenges ahead as taxonomy begins to take a front seat in the implementation of environmental policy on the world stage.     

Classical and non-classical taxonomy: where does the boundary pass?

Rise of non-classical science during XX century had certain influence upon development of biological taxonomy. Scientific pluralism (especially normative naturalism of Laudan), contrary to positivist and early post-positivist treatments, made taxonomy acknowledged scientific discipline of its own right. The present state of some schools of taxonomy makes it possible to consider them as a part of non-classical science and constituting the non-classical taxonomy. The latter is characterized by the following most important features. Ontological substantiation of both classificatory approaches and particular classifications is requested which invalidates such formal approaches as nominalistic and phenetic (numerical) schools. This substantiation takes a form of content-wise background preferably causal models which include certain axioms and presumptions about taxonomic diversity being studied, together with its causes, and thus define initial conditions of classificatory procedures. From this viewoint, phylogenetic classificatory approach is the most developed part of non-classical taxonomy. The entire taxonomic diversity is structured into several aspects of different levels of generality, each being outlined by a particular consideration aspect. The latter makes personal knowledge constituting an irremovable part of any scientific statement about taxonomic diversity, thus opposition of "objectively" and "subjectively" elaborated classifications becomes vague. Interrelation of various species concepts corresponding to its different consideration aspects is described by uncertainty relation principle. Classificatory algorithms are to be compatible with the conditions of a background model to ensure particular classifications obtained by their means are interpretable within the same model: this is provided by the correspondence principle. Classification is considered as a taxonomic hypothesis, i.e. a conjectural judgement about structure of particular fragment of taxonomic diversity considered within given consideration aspect; wich is to be forwarded and tested according to certain rules. Recognition of different aspects of taxonomic diversity makes it "legal" to elaborate several classifications of equal status, each reflecting a particular aspect of a fixed fragment of that diversity. This viewpoint makes classical ideas of the "ultimate" Natural (whatever might be its definition) or the best reference systems futile. In general, any pretension of an approach to be "the best" in reflecting taxonomic divesrity is contr-productive. Instead, elaboration of particular spectra of complementary classifications becomes the main task of non-classical taxonomy which describes in sum the entire taxonomic diversity. So, not opposition but correct mutual interpretation of such classifications and uniting them into the comprehensive picture of taxonomic diversity become focal points of non-classical taxonomy.