The heat shock response and cytoprotection of the intestinal epithelium

Following heat stress, the mammalian intestinal epithelial cells respond by producing heat shock proteins that confer protection under stressful conditions, which would otherwise lead to cell damage or death. Some of the noxious processes against which the heat shock response protects cells include heat stress, infection, and inflammation. The mechanisms of heat shock response-induced cytoprotection involve inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine production and induction of cellular proliferation for restitution of the damaged epithelium. This can mean selective interference of pathways, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), that mediate cytokine production and growth responses. Insight into elucidating the exact protective mechanisms could have therapeutic significance in treating intestinal inflammations and in aiding maintenance of intestinal integrity. Herein we review findings on heat shock response-induced intestinal epithelial protection involving regulation of NF-kappaB and MAPK cytokine production.     

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) specifically potentiates c-MYC-mediated transcription independently of the canonical heat shock response

1. Download : Download high-res image (172KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Gambogic acid and gambogenic acid induce a thiol-dependent heat shock response and disrupt the interaction between HSP90 and HSF1 or HSF2

Cancer cells rely on heat shock proteins (HSPs) for growth and survival. Especially HSP90 has multiple client proteins and plays a critical role in malignant transformation, and therefore different types of HSP90 inhibitors are being developed. The bioactive natural compound gambogic acid (GB) is a prenylated xanthone with antitumor activity, and it has been proposed to function as an HSP90 inhibitor. However, there are contradicting reports whether GB induces a heat shock response (HSR), which is cytoprotective for cancer cells and therefore a potentially problematic feature for an anticancer drug. In this study, we show that GB and a structurally related compound, called gambogenic acid (GBA), induce a robust HSR, in a thiol-dependent manner. Using heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) or HSF2 knockout cells, we show that the GB or GBA-induced HSR is HSF1-dependent. Intriguingly, using closed form ATP-bound HSP90 mutants that can be co-precipitated with HSF1, a known facilitator of cancer, we show that also endogenous HSF2 co-precipitates with HSP90. GB and GBA treatment disrupt the interaction between HSP90 and HSF1 and HSP90 and HSF2. Our study implies that these compounds should be used cautiously if developed for cancer therapies, since GB and its derivative GBA are strong inducers of the HSR, in multiple cell types, by involving the dissociation of a HSP90-HSF1/HSF2 complex.