Thermodynamic aspects of cell spreading on solid substrata

To verify the validity of thermodynamic approaches to the prediction of cellular behavior, cell spreading of three different cell types on solid substrata was determined in vitro. Solid substrata as well as cell types were selected on the basis of their surface free energies, calculated from contact angle measurements. The surface free energies of the solid substrata ranged from 18–116 erg cm⁻². To measure contact angles on cells, a technique was developed in which a multilayer of cells was deposited on a filter and air dried. Cell surface free energies ranged from 60 erg cm⁻² for fibroblasts, and 57 for smooth muscle cells, to 91 for HeLa epithelial cells. After adsorption of serum proteins, cell surface free energies of all three cell types converged to approx 74 erg cm⁻². The spreading of these cell types from RPMI 1640 medium on the various solid substrata showed that both in the presence and in the absence of serum proteins in the medium, cells spread poorly on low energy substrata (Y _s <50 erg cm⁻²), whereas good cell spreading was observed on the higher energy substrata. Calculations of the interfacial free energy of adhesion (ΔF _adh) show that ΔF _adh decreases with increasingY _s , and equals zero around 45 erg cm⁻² for all three cell types in the presence of serum proteins and for HeLa epithelium cells in the absence of serum proteins. This explains the spreading of these cells on the various substrata upon a thermodynamic basis. The results clearly show that substratum surface free energy has a predictive value with respect to cell spreading in vitro, both in the presence and absence of serum proteins. It is noted, however, that interfacial thermodynamics fail to explain the behavior of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in the absence of serum proteins, most likely because of the relatively high surface charges of these two cell types.     

Thermodynamic aspects of cell spreading on solid substrata

To verify the validity of thermodynamic approaches to the prediction of cellular behavior, cell spreading of three different cell types on solid substrata was determined in vitro. Solid substrata as well as cell types were selected on the basis of their surface free energies, calculated from contact angle measurements. The surface free energies of the solid substrata ranged from 18-116 erg cm-2. To measure contact angles on cells, a technique was developed in which a multilayer of cells was deposited on a filter and air dried. Cell surface free energies ranged from 60 erg cm-2 for fibroblasts, and 57 for smooth muscle cells, to 91 for HeLa epithelial cells. After adsorption of serum proteins, cell surface free energies of all three cell types converged to approx 74 erg cm-2. The spreading of these cell types from RPMI 1640 medium on the various solid substrata showed that both in the presence and in the absence of serum proteins in the medium, cells spread poorly on low energy substrata (Ys less than 50 erg cm-2), whereas good cell spreading was observed on the higher energy substrata. Calculations of the interfacial free energy of adhesion (delta Fadh) show that delta Fadh decreases with increasing Ys, and equals zero around 45 erg cm-2 for all three cell types in the presence of serum proteins and for HeLa epithelium cells in the absence of serum proteins. This explains the spreading of these cells on the various substrata upon a thermodynamic basis. The results clearly show that substratum surface free energy has a predictive value with respect to cell spreading in vitro, both in the presence and absence of serum proteins. It is noted, however, that interfacial thermodynamics fail to explain the behavior of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in the absence of serum proteins, most likely because of the relatively high surface charges of these two cell types.     

Fibroblast spreading and phagocytosis: similar cell responses to different-sized substrata

Experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that cell spreading and phagocytosis are similar cell responses to different-sized substrata. The following morphological and biochemical studies provided evidence for this supposition. Cells phagocytosed 1.09-micron and 5.7-micron latex beads, but were unable to completely ingest 15.8-micron or 25.7-micron beads. With the larger beads, the cells spread around the bead surfaces with an appearance typical of cells spread on culture dishes. Biochemical studies with cytochalasin D, azide, and iodoacetate, as well as temperature-dependence studies, demonstrated similar responses of cell spreading and phagocytosis to these treatments. Similar cell surface receptors were involved in cell spreading and phagocytosis based upon experiments using antibodies to baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell wheat germ agglutinin receptors. And finally, BHK cell variants with defective plasma fibronectin (pFN) receptors were unable to spread on pFN-coated dishes or ingest pFN-coated beads. Evidence also is presented concerning the "contact" process in cell adhesion. It was found that azide and low temperature inhibited cell attachment per se but did not block fibronectin-receptor interactions based upon cell binding of pFN-coated beads. A possible explanation for the contact process is presented based upon the resistance of cells and beads to shear forces.     

Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly

Cell-extracellular matrix (cell-ECM) interactions mediated by integrin receptors are essential for providing positional and environmental information necessary for many cell functions, such as proliferation, differentiation and survival. In vitro studies on cell adhesion to randomly adsorbed molecules on substrates have been limited to sub-micrometer patches, thus preventing the detailed study of structural arrangement of integrins and their ligands. In this article, we illustrate the role of the distance between integrin ligands, namely the RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartate) sequence present in ECM proteins, in the control of cell adhesion. By using substrates, which carry cyclic RGD peptides arranged in highly defined nanopatterns, we investigated the dynamics of cell spreading and the molecular composition of adhesion sites in relation to a fixed spacing between the peptides on the surface. Our novel approach for in vitro studies on cell adhesion indicates that not only the composition, but also the spatial organization of the extracellular environment is important in regulating cell-ECM interactions.     

Functionally distinct laminin receptors mediate cell adhesion and spreading: the requirement for surface galactosyltransferase in cell spreading

The molecular mechanisms underlying cell attachment and subsequent cell spreading on laminin are shown to be distinct form one another. Cell spreading is dependent upon the binding of cell surface galactosyltransferase (GalTase) to laminin oligosaccharides, while initial cell attachment to laminin occurs independent of GalTase activity. Anti-GalTase IgG, as well as the GalTase modifier protein, alpha-lactalbumin, both block GalTase activity and inhibited B16-F10 melanoma cell spreading on laminin, but not initial attachment. On the other hand, the addition of UDP galactose, which increases the catalytic turnover of GalTase, slightly increased cell spreading. None of these reagents had any effect on cell spreading on fibronectin. When GalTase substrates within laminin were either blocked by affinity- purified GalTase or eliminated by prior galactosylation, cell attachment appeared normal, but subsequent cell spreading was totally inhibited. The laminin substrate for GalTase was identified as N-linked oligosaccharides primarily on the A chain, and to a lesser extent on B chains. That N-linked oligosaccharides are necessary for cell spreading was shown by the inability of cells to spread on laminin surfaces pretreated with N-glycanase, even though cell attachment was normal. Cell surface GalTase was distinguished from other reported laminin binding proteins, most notably the 68-kD receptor, since they were differentially eluted from laminin affinity columns. These data show that surface GalTase does not participate during initial cell adhesion to laminin, but mediates subsequent cell spreading by binding to its appropriate N-linked oligosaccharide substrate. These results also emphasize that some of laminin's biological properties can be attributed to its oligosaccharide residues.     

EDI3 links choline metabolism to integrin expression,cell adhesion and spreading

Endometrial carcinoma differential 3 (EDI3) was the first member of the glycerophosphodiesterase (GDE) protein family shown to be associated with cancer. Our initial work demonstrated that endometrial and ovarian cancer patients with primary tumors overexpressing EDI3 had a higher risk of developing metastasis and decreased survival. Further analysis indicated that EDI3 cleaves glycerophosphocholine to choline and glycerol-3-phosphate, increases the levels of active PKC, and enhances the migratory activity of tumor cells. Despite these initial findings, EDI3 remained mainly uncharacterized. Therefore, to obtain an overview of processes in which EDI3 may be involved, gene array analysis was performed using MCF-7 breast cancer cells after EDI3 knockdown compared with a non-targeting control siRNA. Several biological motifs were altered, including an enrichment of genes involved in integrin-mediated signaling. More specifically, silencing of EDI3 in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells was associated with reduced expression of the key receptor subunit integrin β1, leading to decreased cell attachment and spreading accompanied by delayed formation of cell protrusions. To confirm these results, we stably overexpressed EDI3 in MCF-7 cells which led to elevated integrin β1 expression associated with enhanced cell attachment and spreading - two processes critical for metastasis. In conclusion, our data provide further insight into the role of EDI3 during cancer progression.     

The role of integrin glycosylation in galectin-8-mediated trabecular meshwork cell adhesion and spreading

Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is a major blindness-causingdisease, characterized by elevated intraocular pressure dueto an insufficient outflow of aqueous humor. The trabecularmeshwork (TM) lining the aqueous outflow pathway modulates theaqueous outflow facility. TM cell adhesion, cell–matrixinteractions, and factors that influence Rho signaling in TMcells are thought to play a pivotal role in the regulation ofaqueous outflow. In a recent study, we demonstrated that galectin-8(Gal8) modulates the adhesion and cytoskeletal arrangement ofTM cells and that it does so through binding to β₁ integrinsand inducing Rho signaling. The current study is aimed at thecharacterization of the mechanism by which Gal8 mediates TMcell adhesion and spreading. We demonstrate here that TM cellsadhere to and spread on Gal8-coated wells but not on galectin-1(Gal1)- or galectin-3 (Gal3)-coated wells. The adhesion of TMcells to Gal8-coated wells was abolished by a competing sugar,β-lactose, but not by a noncompeting sugar, sucrose. Also,a trisaccharide, NeuAc2-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc, which binds specificallyto the N-CRD of Gal8, inhibited the spreading of TM cells toGal8-coated wells. In contrast, NeuAc2-6Galβ1-4GlcNAc whichlacks affinity for Gal8 had no effect. Affinity chromatographyof cell extracts on a Gal8-affinity column and binding experimentswith plant lectins, Maakia Amurensis and Sambucus Nigra, revealedthat ₃β₁, ₅β₁, and _vβ₁ integrins are major counterreceptorsof Gal8 in TM cells and that TM cell β₁ integrins carrypredominantly 2-3-sialylated glycans, which are high-affinityligands for Gal8 but not for Gal1 or Gal3. These data lead usto propose that Gal8 modulates TM cell adhesion and spreading,at least in part, by interacting with 2-3-sialylated glycanson β₁ integrins.     

EDI3 links choline metabolism to integrin expression,cell adhesion and spreading

Endometrial carcinoma differential 3 (EDI3) was the first member of the glycerophosphodiesterase (GDE) protein family shown to be associated with cancer. Our initial work demonstrated that endometrial and ovarian cancer patients with primary tumors overexpressing EDI3 had a higher risk of developing metastasis and decreased survival. Further analysis indicated that EDI3 cleaves glycerophosphocholine to choline and glycerol-3-phosphate, increases the levels of active PKC, and enhances the migratory activity of tumor cells. Despite these initial findings, EDI3 remained mainly uncharacterized. Therefore, to obtain an overview of processes in which EDI3 may be involved, gene array analysis was performed using MCF-7 breast cancer cells after EDI3 knockdown compared with a non-targeting control siRNA. Several biological motifs were altered, including an enrichment of genes involved in integrin-mediated signaling. More specifically, silencing of EDI3 in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells was associated with reduced expression of the key receptor subunit integrin β1, leading to decreased cell attachment and spreading accompanied by delayed formation of cell protrusions. To confirm these results, we stably overexpressed EDI3 in MCF-7 cells which led to elevated integrin β1 expression associated with enhanced cell attachment and spreading - two processes critical for metastasis. In conclusion, our data provide further insight into the role of EDI3 during cancer progression.     

EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces

Eph signaling, which arises following stimulation by ephrins, is known to induce opposite cell behaviors such as promoting and inhibiting cell adhesion as well as promoting cell-cell adhesion and repulsion by altering the organization of the actin cytoskeleton and influencing the adhesion activities of integrins. However, crosstalk between Eph/ephrin with integrin signaling has not been fully elucidated in leukocytes, including monocytes and their related cells. Using a cell attachment stripe assay, we have shown that, following stimulation with ephrin-A1, kinase-independent EphA2 promoted cell spreading/elongation as well as adhesion to integrin ligand-coated surfaces in cultured U937 (monocyte) and J774.1 (monocyte/macrophage) cells as well as sublines of these cells expressing dominant negative EphA2 that lacks most of the intracellular region. Moreover, a pull-down assay showed that dominant negative EphA2 is recruited to the β2 integrin/ICAM1 and β2 integrin/VCAM1 molecular complexes in the subline cells following stimulation with ephrin-A1-Fc. Notably, this study is the first comprehensive analysis of the effects of EphA2 receptors on integrin-mediated cell adhesion in monocytic cells. Based on these findings we propose that EphA2 promotes cell adhesion by an unknown signaling pathway that largely depends on the extracellular region of EphA2 and the activation of outside-in integrin signaling.     

The integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein ICAP-1 binds and regulates Rho family GTPases during cell spreading.

Using two-hybrid screening, we isolated the integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein (ICAP-1), an interactor for the COOH terminal region of the beta1A integrin cytoplasmic domain. To investigate the role of ICAP-1 in integrin-mediated adhesive function, we expressed the full-length molecule in NIH3T3 cells. ICAP-1 expression strongly prevents NIH3T3 cell spreading on extracellular matrix. This inhibition is transient and can be counteracted by coexpression of a constitutively activated mutant of Cdc42, suggesting that ICAP-1 acts upstream of this GTPase. In addition, we found that ICAP-1 binds both to Cdc42 and Rac1 in vitro, and its expression markedly inhibits activation of these GTPases during integrin-mediated cell adhesion to fibronectin as detected by PAK binding assay. In the attempt to define the molecular mechanism of this inhibition, we show that ICAP-1 reduces both the intrinsic and the exchange factor-induced dissociation of GDP from Cdc42; moreover, purified ICAP-1 displaces this GTPase from cellular membranes. Together, these data show for the first time that ICAP-1 regulates Rho family GTPases during integrin-mediated cell matrix adhesion, acting as guanine dissociation inhibitor.     

EphA2 promotes cell adhesion and spreading of monocyte and monocyte/macrophage cell lines on integrin ligand-coated surfaces

Eph signaling, which arises following stimulation by ephrins, is known to induce opposite cell behaviors such as promoting and inhibiting cell adhesion as well as promoting cell-cell adhesion and repulsion by altering the organization of the actin cytoskeleton and influencing the adhesion activities of integrins. However, crosstalk between Eph/ephrin with integrin signaling has not been fully elucidated in leukocytes, including monocytes and their related cells. Using a cell attachment stripe assay, we have shown that, following stimulation with ephrin-A1, kinase-independent EphA2 promoted cell spreading/elongation as well as adhesion to integrin ligand-coated surfaces in cultured U937 (monocyte) and J774.1 (monocyte/macrophage) cells as well as sublines of these cells expressing dominant negative EphA2 that lacks most of the intracellular region. Moreover, a pull-down assay showed that dominant negative EphA2 is recruited to the β2 integrin/ICAM1 and β2 integrin/VCAM1 molecular complexes in the subline cells following stimulation with ephrin-A1-Fc. Notably, this study is the first comprehensive analysis of the effects of EphA2 receptors on integrin-mediated cell adhesion in monocytic cells. Based on these findings we propose that EphA2 promotes cell adhesion by an unknown signaling pathway that largely depends on the extracellular region of EphA2 and the activation of outside-in integrin signaling.     

Cell adhesion to tenascin-X mapping of cell adhesion sites and identification of integrin receptors.

Adhesive properties of tenascin-X (TN-X) were investigated using TN-X purified from bovine skin and recombinant proteins encompassing the RGD sequence located within the tenth fibronectin type-III domain, and the fibrinogen-like domain. Osteosarcoma (MG63) and bladder carcinoma cells (ECV304) cells were shown to adhere to purified TN-X, but did not spread and did not assemble actin stress fibers. Both cell types adhered to recombinant proteins harboring the contiguous fibronectin type-III domains 9 and 10 (FNX 9-10) but not to the FNX 10 domain alone. This adhesion to FNX 9-10 was shown to be mediated by alphavbeta3 integrin, was inhibited by RGD peptides and was strongly reduced in proteins mutated within the RGD site. As antibodies against alphavbeta3 integrin had no effects on cell adhesion to purified TN-X, we suggest that the RGD sequence is masked in intact TN-X. Cell attachment to the recombinant TN-X fibrinogen domain (FbgX) and to purified TN-X was greater for MG63 than for ECV304 cells. A beta1-containing integrin was shown to be involved in MG63 cell attachment to FbgX and to purified TN-X. Although the existence of other cell interaction sites is likely in this huge molecule, these similar patterns of adhesion and inhibition suggest that the fibrinogen domain might be a dominant site in the whole molecule.     

Integrin-mediated muscle cell spreading. The role of protein kinase c in outside-in and inside-out signaling and evidence of integrin cross-talk.

Muscle cell survival depends upon the presence of various integrins with affinities for different extracellular matrix proteins. The absence of either alpha(5) or alpha(7) integrins leads to degenerative disorders of skeletal muscle, muscular dystrophies. To understand the cell survival signals that are mediated by integrin engagement with matrix proteins, we studied the early signaling events initiated by the attachment of muscle cells to fibronectin, an interaction that is mediated primarily by alpha(5) integrins. Cells that express alpha(5) integrin rapidly spread on fibronectin, and this process is associated with the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Cells deficient in alpha(5) integrin failed to spread or promote FAK phosphorylation when plated on fibronectin. For alpha(5)-expressing cells, both spreading and FAK phosphorylation could be blocked by inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC), indicating that PKC is necessary for this "outside-in signaling" mediated by alpha(5) integrin. Surprisingly, activators of PKC could promote spreading and FAK phosphorylation in alpha(5)-deficient muscle cells plated on fibronectin. This PKC-induced cell spreading appeared to be due to activation of alpha(4) integrins ("inside-out signaling") since it could be blocked by peptides that specifically inhibit alpha(4) integrin binding to fibronectin. A model of integrin signaling in muscle cells is presented in which there is a positive feedback loop involving PKC in both outside-in and inside-out signaling, and the activation of this cycle is essential for cell spreading and downstream signaling to promote cell survival. In addition, the data indicate a cross-talk that occurs between integrins in which the outside-in signaling via one integrin can promote the activation of another integrin via inside-out signaling.     

Integrins in point contacts mediate cell spreading: factors that regulate integrin accumulation in point contacts vs. focal contacts

We have studied the function and distribution of the alpha 1 beta 1, alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha 6 beta 1 heterodimers on type-1 astrocytes with antibodies specific for integrin subunits (alpha 1, alpha 5, alpha 6, and beta 1). The alpha 1 beta 1 heterodimer mediates adhesion to laminin and collagen, the alpha 5 beta 1 to fibronectin in an RGD- dependent manner. The alpha 5 beta 1 integrin is found in focal contacts in long-term cultures of well-spread astrocytes colocalizing with vinculin and the termini of actin stress fibers. alpha 1 beta 1 heterodimers can occasionally be found as small aggregates within focal contacts but they do not accumulate there. Instead, alpha 1 beta 1 integrins are found in punctate deposits called point contacts which are distributed over the upper and the lower cell surfaces whether laminin, collagen, fibronectin or polylysine is used as a substratum. Unlike focal contacts, point contacts contain clathrin but rarely codistribute with actin or vinculin. Two observations indicate that these point contacts are functional. First, mAb 3A3, directed against the rat alpha 1 subunit, inhibits the attachment of astrocytes to laminin and collagen. Second, during the spreading of astrocytes, a band of point contacts forms around the cell perimeter at a time when no focal contacts are visible. While alpha 1 beta 1 integrins are found only in point contacts in astrocytes, the alpha 6 beta 1 integrin, another laminin receptor, is localized within focal contacts. Moreover, alpha 1 beta 1 heterodimers accumulate in focal contacts in fibroblasts. Thus, the alpha subunit contributes, independent of its ligand, to functional integrin heterodimer accumulation in focal contacts or in point contacts. This accumulation varies among different cell types with apparently identical heterodimers as well as with the motile state (spreading vs. flattened) of the same cells.     

Requirement of the integrin beta 3 subunit for carcinoma cell spreading or migration on vitronectin and fibrinogen

FG human pancreatic carcinoma cells use integrin alpha v beta 5 as their primary vitronectin receptor since they fail to express integrin alpha v beta 3. These cells are unable to form focal contacts, spread, or migrate on vitronectin but readily do so on collagen in a beta 1 integrin-dependent manner. Transfection of FG cells with a cDNA encoding the integrin beta 3 subunit results in the surface expression of a functional integrin alpha v beta 3 heterodimer providing these cells with novel adhesive and biological properties. Specifically, FG cells expressing beta 3 acquire the capacity to attach and spread on vitronectin as well as fibrinogen with beta 3 localization to focal contacts. Moreover, these cells gain the capacity to migrate through a porous membrane in response to either vitronectin or fibrinogen. These results demonstrate that the beta 3 and beta 5 integrin subunits when associated with alpha v, promote distinct cellular responses to a vitronectin extracellular environment.     

Changes in integrin receptors on oncogenically transformed cells

Oncogenically transformed cells show reduced assembly of fibronectin-rich extracellular matrixes and diminished ability to adhere to fibronectin. The molecular bases of these phenotypic alteration are not fully understood. We report here alterations in the spectrum of integrins, including two fibronectin receptors, on oncogenic transformation of rodent cells. Transformation of rat1, NRK, and Nil8 cells by Rous sarcoma virus or by murine sarcoma viruses encoding ras oncogenes leads to reductions in the level of integrin alpha 5 beta 1, which is a well-defined fibronectin receptor, and of two other integrin receptors. In contrast, another receptor, alpha 3 beta 1, which is a polyspecific receptor for fibronectin, laminin, and collagen, is retained by transformed cells. These results provide explanations for earlier results concerning the interactions of extracellular matrix proteins with the surfaces of tumor cells and offer leads to further understanding of the altered adhesive and migratory behavior of malignant cells.     

Role of specific cell surface receptors in thrombin-stimulated cell division

Previous studies have shown that thrombin action at the cell surface is sufficient to bring about division of cultured fibroblast-like cells (Carney and Cunningham, 1978). This prompted the present binding experiments with ¹²⁵I-thrombin which led to the Identification of a thrombin receptor on the surface of mouse embryo cells. Scatchard plots of binding data at 4, 22 and 37°C were linear over a broad range of thrombin concentrations, indicating a single affinity class of receptors. The association constant was about 1 × 10⁹ M^?1 and there were approximately 2 × 10⁵ receptors per cell. Neither insulin, epidermal growth factor nor prothrombin competed for thrombin binding to its receptor, indicating that It was unique for thrombin. Comparisons of thrombin binding and the amount of cell division produced by various concentrations of thrombin indicated that there was a relationship between receptor occupancy and increase in cell number. Low concentrations of serum (0.1%) inhibited both the mitogenic action of thrombin and the specific binding of thrombin to its receptor. It did not, however, inhibit nonspecific association of ¹²⁵I-thrombin with the cells. Experiments showed that this inhibition by serum resulted from a masking of thrombin receptors on the cells and not from binding of thrombin by serum factors. Together these studies suggest that thrombin must bind to Its surface receptor to stimulate cell division.     

ERK1 associates with alpha(v)beta 3 integrin and regulates cell spreading on vitronectin

Kinases that associate with integrins are likely to mediate the assembly/disassembly of cell:matrix junctions during cell migration. Here we show that ERK1 associates with alpha(v)beta(3) integrin following the addition of platelet-derived growth factor to serum-starved Swiss or NIH 3T3 fibroblasts in an interaction that is mediated by the central region of the beta(3) integrin cytodomain. alpha(v)beta(3).ERK1 association occurred prior to focal complex formation and was seen to initiate in small punctate complexes primarily in the peripheral regions of the plasma membrane. Expression of a dominant negative mutant of ERK1 (but not ERK2) significantly reduced the spreading of cells on vitronectin, whereas cell spreading on fibronectin was unaffected by inhibition of ERK1. In contrast, inhibition of ERK activation by PD98059 had no effect on the platelet-derived growth factor-regulated Rab4-dependent flux of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin from early endosomes to the plasma membrane, an event that is also necessary for cells to spread efficiently on vitronectin. We propose that alpha(v)beta(3) integrin must recycle to the plasma membrane via the Rab4 pathway and recruit active ERK1 in order to function efficiently.     

Essential fatty acid deficiency impairs macrophage spreading and adherence. Role of arachidonate in cell adhesion

Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid manipulation exerts a strikingly protective effect in models of tissue inflammation and injury. A critical element of this effect appears to revolve around leukocyte trafficking but underlying mechanisms are ill understood. In the current study it was observed that essential fatty acid (EFA) deficiency markedly impaired the capacity of resident macrophages to spread and adhere. This effect was not a simple function of the alteration of membrane fatty acid composition. Elicited EFA-deficient macrophages were equally adherent to elicited control cells, despite the fact that they were equally EFA-deficient relative to resident EFA-deficient cells. With respect to the mechanism underlying defective macrophage adherence in EFA deficiency, no change in the expression of cell surface adherence molecules (Fc receptor, Mac-1, or LFA-1) was noted with the deficiency state. Also, an adherence defect could not be induced in normal cells pharmacologically with cyclooxygenase blockade, lipoxygenase blockade, or a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist. In contrast, phospholipase inhibition was able to induce a spreading and adherence defect in resident macrophages similar to that seen with EFA deficiency. Using several phospholipase inhibitors, a correlation between phospholipase inhibition and impairment of adherence was observed. Adding back exogenous fatty acids to cells after phospholipase inhibition demonstrated that normal adherence was reconstituted with arachidonate. This alteration in macrophage spreading and adherence with EFA deficiency may be an important component of the anti-inflammatory effect of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid manipulation. Additionally, these results suggest that arachidonate may be an intracellular mediator of leukocyte adherence.