Biosynthesis of Firefly Luciferin in Adult Lantern: Decarboxylation of ?-Cysteine is a Key Step for Benzothiazole Ring Formation in Firefly Luciferin Synthesis

Background

Bioluminescence in fireflies and click beetles is produced by a luciferase-luciferin reaction. The luminescence property and protein structure of firefly luciferase have been investigated, and its cDNA has been used for various assay systems. The chemical structure of firefly luciferin was identified as the ᴅ-form in 1963 and studies on the biosynthesis of firefly luciferin began early in the 1970’s. Incorporation experiments using ¹⁴C-labeled compounds were performed, and cysteine and benzoquinone/hydroquinone were proposed to be biosynthetic component for firefly luciferin. However, there have been no clear conclusions regarding the biosynthetic components of firefly luciferin over 30 years.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Incorporation studies were performed by injecting stable isotope-labeled compounds, including ʟ-[U-¹³C₃]-cysteine, ʟ-[1-¹³C]-cysteine, ʟ-[3-¹³C]-cysteine, 1,4-[D₆]-hydroquinone, and p-[2,3,5,6-D]-benzoquinone, into the adult lantern of the living Japanese firefly Luciola lateralis. After extracting firefly luciferin from the lantern, the incorporation of stable isotope-labeled compounds into firefly luciferin was identified by LC/ESI-TOF-MS. The positions of the stable isotope atoms in firefly luciferin were determined by the mass fragmentation of firefly luciferin.

Conclusions

We demonstrated for the first time that ᴅ- and ʟ-firefly luciferins are biosynthesized in the lantern of the adult firefly from two ʟ-cysteine molecules with p-benzoquinone/1,4-hydroquinone, accompanied by the decarboxylation of ʟ-cysteine.     

Development of near-infrared firefly luciferin analogue reacted with wild-type and mutant luciferases

Interestingly, only the D-form of firefly luciferin produces light by luciferin–luciferase (L–L) reaction. Certain firefly luciferin analogues with modified structures maintain bioluminescence (BL) activity; however, all L-form luciferin analogues show no BL activity. To this date, our group has developed luciferin analogues with moderate BL activity that produce light of various wavelengths. For in vivo bioluminescence imaging, one of the important factors for detection sensitivity is tissue permeability of the number of photons emitted by L–L reaction, and the wavelengths of light in the near-infrared (NIR) range (700–900 nm) are most appropriate for the purpose. Some NIR luciferin analogues by us had performance for in vivo experiments to make it possible to detect photons from deep target tissues in mice with high sensitivity, whereas only a few of them can produce NIR light by the L–L reactions with wild-type luciferase and/or mutant luciferase. Based on the structure–activity relationships, we designed and synthesized here a luciferin analogue with the 5-allyl-6-dimethylamino-2-naphthylethenyl moiety. This analogue exhibited NIR BL emissions with wild-type luciferase (λ_max = 705 nm) and mutant luciferase AlaLuc (λ_max = 655 nm).     

Stability of d‐luciferin for bioluminescence to detect gene expression in freely moving mice for long durations

Circadian disturbance of clock gene expression is a risk factor for diseases such as obesity, cancer, and sleep disorders. To study these diseases, it is necessary to monitor and analyze the expression rhythm of clock genes in the whole body for a long duration. The bioluminescent reporter enzyme firefly luciferase and its substrate d ‐luciferin have been used to generate optical signals from tissues in vivo with high sensitivity. However, little information is known about the stability of d ‐luciferin to detect gene expression in living animals for a long duration. In the present study, we examined the stability of a luciferin solution over 21 days. l ‐Luciferin, which is synthesized using racemization of d ‐luciferin, was at high concentrations after 21 days. In addition, we showed that bioluminescence of Period1 (Per1) expression in the liver was significantly decreased compared with the day 1 solution, although locomotor activity rhythm was not affected. These results showed that d ‐luciferin should be applied to the mouse within, at most, 7 days to detect bioluminescence of Per1 gene expression rhythm in vivo.     

Biosynthesis-inspired deracemizative production of d-luciferin by combining luciferase and thioesterase

Due to the strict enantioselectivity of firefly luciferase, only d-luciferin can be used as a substrate for bioluminescence reactions. Unfortunately, luciferin racemizes easily and accumulation of nonluminous l-luciferin has negative influences on the light emitting reaction. Thus, maintaining the enantiopurity of luciferin in the reaction mixture is one of the most important demands in bioluminescence applications using firefly luciferase. In fireflies, however, l-luciferin is the biosynthetic precursor of d-luciferin, which is produced from the L-form undergoing deracemization. This deracemization consists of three successive reactions: l-enantioselective thioesterification by luciferase, in situ epimerization, and hydrolysis by thioesterase. In this work, we introduce a deracemizative luminescence system inspired by the biosynthetic pathway of d-luciferin using a combination of firefly luciferase from Luciola cruciata (LUC-G) and fatty acyl-CoA thioesterase II from Escherichia coli (TESB). The enzymatic reaction property analysis indicated the importance of the concentration balance between LUC-G and TESB for efficient d-luciferin production and light emission. Using this deracemizative luminescence system, a highly sensitive quantitative analysis method for l-cysteine was constructed. This LUC-G-TESB combination system can improve bioanalysis applications using the firefly bioluminescence reaction by efficient deracemization of D-luciferin.     

2-S-cysteinylhydroquinone is an intermediate for the firefly luciferin biosynthesis that occurs in the pupal stage of the Japanese firefly,Luciola lateralis

Firefly luciferin is a natural product that is well-known to function as the substrate of the bioluminescence reaction in luminous beetles. However, the details of the biosynthetic system are still unclear. In this study, we showed by LC-MS/MS analysis that stable isotope-labeled 2-S-cysteinylhydroquinone was incorporated into firefly luciferin in living firefly specimens. Comparison of the incorporation efficiency among the developmental stages suggested that firefly luciferin is biosynthesized predominantly in the pupal stage. We also accomplished the in vitro biosynthesis of firefly luciferin using 2-S-cysteinylhydroquinone and the crude buffer extract of firefly pupae, suggesting the presence of a biosynthetic enzyme in the pupal extract.     

Mathematical Model of the Firefly Luciferase Complementation Assay Reveals a Non-Linear Relationship between the Detected Luminescence and the Affinity of the Protein Pair Being Analyzed

The firefly luciferase complementation assay is widely used as a bioluminescent reporter technology to detect protein-protein interactions in vitro, in cellulo, and in vivo. Upon the interaction of a protein pair, complemented firefly luciferase emits light through the adenylation and oxidation of its substrate, luciferin. Although it has been suggested that kinetics of light production in the firefly luciferase complementation assay is different from that in full length luciferase, the mechanism behind this is still not understood. To quantitatively understand the different kinetics and how changes in affinity of a protein pair affect the light emission in the assay, a mathematical model of the in vitro firefly luciferase complementation assay was constructed. Analysis of the model finds that the change in kinetics is caused by rapid dissociation of the protein pair, low adenylation rate of luciferin, and increased affinity of adenylated luciferin to the enzyme. The model suggests that the affinity of the protein pair has an exponential relationship with the light detected in the assay. This relationship causes the change of affinity in a protein pair to be underestimated. This study underlines the importance of understanding the molecular mechanism of the firefly luciferase complementation assay in order to analyze protein pair affinities quantitatively.     

Enhanced luciferin entry causes rapid wound-induced light emission in plants expressing high levels of luciferase

In-vivo imaging of transgenic tobacco plants (Nicotiana tobacum L.) expressing firefly luciferase under the control of the Arabidopsis phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 1 (PAL1)-promoter showed that luciferase-catalyzed light emission began immediately after the substrate luciferin was sprayed onto the leaves and reached a plateau phase after approximately 60 min. This luminescence could easily be detected for up to 24 h after luciferin application although the light intensity declined continuously during this period. A strong and rapid increase in light emission was observed within the first minutes after wounding of luciferin-sprayed leaves. However, these data did not correlate with luciferase activity analysed by an in-vitro enzyme assay. In addition, Arabidopsis plants expressing luciferase under the control of the constitutive 35S-promoter showed similar wound-induced light emission. In experiments in which only parts of the leaves were sprayed with luciferin solutions, it was shown that increased uptake of luciferin at the wound site and its transport through vascular tissue were the main reasons for the rapid burst of light produced by preformed luciferase activity. These data demonstrate that there are barriers that restrict luciferin entry into adult plants, and that luciferin availability can be a limiting factor in non-invasive luciferase assays. Received: 11 March 2000 / Accepted: 16 May 2000     

Determination of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by the luciferase system with a stopped-flow spectrometer.

A stopped-flow spectrometer is used for ATP assay by firefly luciferase-luciferin method. It allows one to record initial rise of the light intensity and to differentiate the light produced due to the conversion of ADP to ATP by nucleoside diphosphokinase in the firefly lantern when other nucleoside triphosphates are present. Addition of luciferin (0.27 mm) to luciferase extract increases the light intensity by a factor of 50–100. This method can be used to measure ATP in the picomole range.     

Is there a specific receptor for anesthetics? Contrary effects of alcohols and fatty acids on phase transition and bioluminescence of firefly luciferase.

Firefly luciferase emits a burst of light when mixed with ATP and luciferin (L) in the presence of oxygen. This study compared the effects of long-chain n-alcohols (1-decanol to 1-octadecanol) and fatty acids (decanoic to octadecanoic acids) on firefly luciferase. Fatty acids were stronger inhibitors of firefly luciferase than n-alcohols. Myristyl alcohol inhibited the light intensity by 50% (IC50) at 13.6 microM, whereas the IC50 of myristic acid was 0.68 microM. According to the Meyer-Overton rule, fatty acids are approximately 12,000-fold stronger inhibitors than corresponding alcohols. The Lineweaver-Burk plot showed that myristic acid inhibited firefly luciferase in competition with luciferin, whereas myristyl alcohol inhibited it noncompetitively. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that an irreversible thermal transition occurred at approximately 39 degrees C with a transition DeltaHcal of 1.57 cal g-1. The ligand effects on the transition were evaluated by the temperature where the irreversible change is half completed. Alcohols decreased whereas fatty acids increased the thermal transition temperature of firefly luciferase. Koshland's transition-state theory (Science. 1963. 142:1533-1541) states that ligands that bind to the substrate-recognition sites induce the enzyme at a transition state, which is more stabilized than the native state against thermal perturbation. The long-chain fatty acids bound to the luciferin recognition site and stabilized the protein conformation at the transition state, which resisted thermal denaturation. Eyring's unfolding theory (Science. 1966. 154:1609-1613) postulates that anesthetics and alcohols bind nonspecifically to interfacial areas of proteins and reversibly unfold the conformation. The present results showed that alcohols do not compete with luciferin and inhibit firefly luciferase nonspecifically by unfolding the protein. Fatty acids are receptor binders and stabilize the protein conformation at the transition state.     

Clinical and biochemical applications of luciferases and luciferins

Recent advances in the analytical applications of bacterial and firefly luciferases and firefly luciferin are reviewed. Luciferases have been used in soluble and immobilized/co-immobilized forms in assays for a variety of enzymes, substrates, and cofactors. The firefly luciferase reaction forms the basis of rapid microbiological tests which have found application in susceptibility testing, detection of bacteriuria, activated sludge analysis, and food testing. Rapid microbiological assays are also possible using bacteriophages containing the lux genes from Virbrio harveyi. Both the firefly and the bacterial luciferase reaction have been applied in immunoassay and DNA probe assays and the firefly luciferin phosphate substrate for alkaline phosphatase labels has proven particularly successful.     

Synthesis and bioluminescence of difluoroluciferin

A new synthesis route to firefly luciferin analogs was developed via the synthesis of 5′,7′-difluoroluciferin. As a luciferase substrate, it produces maximal bioluminescence at a much lower pH than is optimal for native luciferin, and at lower pH it gives much more of the red-shifted emission that is characteristic of the phenolate. These features are attributed to the enhanced acidity of the o,o-difluorophenol.     

Imaging of light emission from the expression of luciferases in living cells and organisms: a review

Luciferases are enzymes that emit light in the presence of oxygen and a substrate (luciferin) and which have been used for real‐time, low‐light imaging of gene expression in cell cultures, individual cells, whole organisms, and transgenic organisms. Such luciferin–luciferase systems include, among others, the bacterial lux genes of terrestrial Photorhabdus luminescens and marine Vibrio harveyi bacteria, as well as eukaryotic luciferase luc and ruc genes from firefly species (Photinus) and the sea panzy (Renilla reniformis), respectively. In various vectors and in fusion constructs with other gene products such as green fluorescence protein (GFP; from the jellyfish Aequorea), luciferases have served as reporters in a number of promoter search and targeted gene expression experiments over the last two decades. Luciferase imaging has also been used to trace bacterial and viral infection in vivo and to visualize the proliferation of tumour cells in animal models. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Determination of the Luciferin Contents in Luminous and Non-Luminous Beetles

The contents of firefly luciferin in luminous and non-luminous beetles were determined by the methods of HPLC with fluorescence detection and the luminescence reaction of luciferin and firefly luciferase. Luminous cantharoids and elaterids contained various amounts of luciferin in the range of pmol to hundreds of nmol, but no luciferin was detected in the non-luminous cantharoids and elaterids.     

Sensitive Analysis of Protein Phosphatase Inhibitors by the Firefly Bioluminescence System: Application to PP1γ

Protein phosphatases are classified into types 1 (PP1) and 2 (PP2A, 2B, and 2C). We have already established a new analysis method for PP2A inhibitors by using the firefly bioluminescence system for detection. This method was successfully applied to determine the PP1γ inhibitory activity of known inhibitors, i.e., calyculin A, microcystin-LR, and tautomycin, requiring less than 10 pmol of a sample.     

Determination of the luciferin contents in luminous and non-luminous beetles

The contents of firefly luciferin in luminous and non-luminous beetles were determined by the methods of HPLC with fluorescence detection and the luminescence reaction of luciferin and firefly luciferase. Luminous cantharoids and elaterids contained various amounts of luciferin in the range of pmol to hundreds of nmol, but no luciferin was detected in the non-luminous cantharoids and elaterids.     

Thein vivo pattern of firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants

Expression of the firefly luciferase gene in transgenic plants produces light emission patterns when the plants are supplied with luciferin. We explored whether inin vivo pattern of light emission truly reveals the pattern of luciferase gene expression or whether it reflects other parameters such as the availability of the substrate, luciferin, or the tissue-specific distribution of organelles in which luciferase was localized. The tissue-specific distribution of luciferase activity and thein vivo pattern of light were examined when the luciferase gene was driven by different promoters and when luciferase was redirected from the peroxisome, where it is normally targeted, to the chloroplast compartment. It was found that the distribution of luciferase activity closely correlated with the tissue-specific pattern of luciferase mRNA. However, thein vivo light pattern appeared to reflect not only tissue-specific distribution of luciferase activity, but also the pattern of luciferin uptake.     

Luciferase as a reporter gene for transformation studies in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Transformed rice plants of var `TN1' were regenerated from immature embryos following particle bombardment with a construct containing the firefly luciferase gene as a reporter gene and the hygromycin resistance gene as a selectable marker. Expression of the luciferase gene in the presence of the substrate luciferin was visualised in the calli derived from bombarded immature embryos and in the leaves and roots of the regenerated transformed plants using a low light imaging system (luminograph). Embryogenic callus proliferation and plant regeneration were unaffected by luciferin treatment and luminograph screening. The quantitative Luc assay using samples of leaf tissue from the segregating generations gave early information about the homozygous and hemizygous state of the luc transgene. Received: 25 August 1998 / Revision received: 2 November 1998 / Accepted: 13 November 1998     

A bifunctional luminogenic substrate for two luminescent enzymes: firefly luciferase and horseradish peroxidase.

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) catalyzes the oxidative chemiluminescent reaction of luminol, and firefly luciferase catalyzes the oxidation of firefly D-luciferin. Here we report a novel substrate, 5-(5'-azoluciferinyl)-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazinedione (ALPDO), that can trigger the activity of HRP and firefly luciferase in solution because it contains both luminol and luciferin functionalities. It is synthesized by diazotization of luminol and its subsequent azo coupling with firefly luciferin. NMR spectral data show that the C5' of benzothiazole in luciferin connects the diazophthalahydrazide. The electronic absorption and fluorescence properties of ALPDO are different from those of its precursor molecules. The chemiluminescence emission spectra of the conjugate substrate display biphotonic emission characteristic of azophthalatedianion and oxyluciferin. It has an optimum pH of 8.0 for maximum activity with respect to HRP as well as luciferase. At pH 8.0 the bifunctional substrate has 12 times the activity of luminol but has 7 times less activity than the firefly luciferin-luciferase system. The specific enhancement of light emission from the cyclic hydrazide part of ALPDO helped in the sensitive assay of HRP down to 2.0 x 10(-13) M and of ATP to 1.0 x 10(-14) mol. Addition of enhancers such as firefly luciferin and p-iodophenol (PIP) to the HRP-ALPDO-H2O2 system enhanced the light output.     

Theoretical insights into the effect of pH values on oxidation processes in the emission of firefly luciferin in aqueous solution

To elucidate the emission process of firefly d ‐luciferin oxidation across the pH range of 7–9, we identified the emission process by comparison of the potential and free‐energy profiles for the formation of the firefly substrate and emitter, including intermediate molecules such as d ‐luciferyl adenylate, 4‐membered dioxetanone, and their deprotonated chemical species. From these relative free energies, it is observed that the oxidation pathway changes from d ‐luciferin → deprotonated d ‐luciferyl adenylate → deprotonated 4‐membered dioxetanone → oxyluciferin to deprotonated d ‐luciferin → deprotonated d ‐luciferyl adenylate → deprotonated 4‐membered dioxetanone → oxyluciferin with increasing pH value. This indicates that deprotonation on 6′OH occurs during the formation of dioxetanone at pH 7–8, whereas luciferin in the reactant has a 6′OH‐deprotonated form at pH 9.     

Use of protein stability to develop dual luciferase toxicity bioreporter strains

This study presents a simple protocol to measure 2 promoter activities within a single culture when using both Lux and firefly luciferase (FF-Luc) reporters. To demonstrate this, 2 E. coli strains were constructed using 2 compatible plasmids, one harboring a katG::luc fusion gene and the other either a fabA::lux or grpE::lux fusion gene. To differentiate between the FF-Luc and Lux activities within E. coli, we used the instability of the V. fischeri Lux proteins. Basically, it involved a two step assay where (1) without addition of luciferin, only the Lux activity was assayed and (2) with added luciferin and a heat treatment at 42°C, the FF-Luc activity was assayed. This was possible because a shift from 28 to 42°C for 10 min was sufficient to denature/inactivate the Lux proteins to background levels. After treatment, the substrate for FF-Luc was added and the FF-Luc activity could be reliably measured. Using this protocol, it was possible to assay the activities of both bioluminescent reporter proteins and, thus, the relative activity of the different promoters. Subsequent experiments were performed using known inducers of the katG, fabA and grpE promoters where tests were successfully performed with single compound samples as well as samples causing a variety of stresses. These results clearly demonstrated that two promoter activities can be monitored in a single host with this dual-luciferase system.