SUMO modification through rapamycin-mediated heterodimerization reveals a dual role for Ubc9 in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complexes

SUMOs (small ubiquitin-related modifiers) are eukaryotic proteins that are covalently conjugated to other proteins and thereby regulate a wide range of important cellular processes. The molecular mechanisms by which SUMO modification influences the functions of most target proteins and cellular processes, however, remain poorly defined. A major obstacle to investigating the effects of SUMO modification is the availability of a system for selectively inducing the modification or demodification of an individual protein. To address this problem, we have developed a procedure using the rapamycin heterodimerizer system. This procedure involves co-expression of rapamycin-binding domain fusion proteins of SUMO and candidate SUMO substrates in living cells. Treating cells with rapamycin induces a tight association between SUMO and a single SUMO substrate, thereby allowing specific downstream effects to be analyzed. Using RanGAP1 as a model SUMO substrate, the heterodimerizer system was used to investigate the molecular mechanism by which SUMO modification targets RanGAP1 from the cytoplasm to nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Our results revealed a dual role for Ubc9 in targeting RanGAP1 to NPCs: In addition to conjugating SUMO-1 to RanGAP1, Ubc9 is also required to form a stable ternary complex with SUMO-1 modified RanGAP1 and Nup358. As illustrated by our studies, the rapamycin heterodimerizer system represents a novel tool for studying the molecular effects of SUMO modification.     

Crystal structure of SUMO-3-modified thymine-DNA glycosylase

Modification of cellular proteins by the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO is important in regulating various cellular events. Many different nuclear proteins are targeted by SUMO, and the functional consequences of this modification are diverse. For most proteins, however, the functional and structural consequences of modification by specific SUMO isomers are unclear. Conjugation of SUMO to thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) induces the dissociation of TDG from its product DNA. Structure determination of the TDG central region conjugated to SUMO-1 previously suggested a mechanism in which the SUMOylation-induced conformational change in the C-terminal region of TDG releases TDG from tight binding to its product DNA. Here, we have determined the crystal structure of the central region of TDG conjugated to SUMO-3. The overall structure of SUMO-3-conjugated TDG is similar to the previously reported structure of TDG conjugated to SUMO-1, despite the relatively low level of amino acid sequence similarity between SUMO-3 and SUMO-1. The two structures revealed that the sequence of TDG that resembles the SUMO-binding motif (SBM) can form an intermolecular beta-sheet with either SUMO-1 or SUMO-3. Structural comparison with the canonical SBM shows that this SBM-like sequence of TDG retains all of the characteristic interactions of the SBM, indicating sequence diversity in the SBM.     

Identification of SUMO modification sites in the base excision repair protein,Ntg1

DNA damaging agents are a constant threat to genomes in both the nucleus and the mitochondria. To combat this threat, a suite of DNA repair pathways cooperate to repair numerous types of DNA damage. If left unrepaired, these damages can result in the accumulation of mutations which can lead to deleterious consequences including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. The base excision repair (BER) pathway is highly conserved from bacteria to humans and is primarily responsible for the removal and subsequent repair of toxic and mutagenic oxidative DNA lesions. Although the biochemical steps that occur in the BER pathway have been well defined, little is known about how the BER machinery is regulated. The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a powerful model system to biochemically and genetically dissect BER. BER is initiated by DNA N-glycosylases, such as S. cerevisiae Ntg1. Previous work demonstrates that Ntg1 is post-translationally modified by SUMO in response to oxidative DNA damage suggesting that this modification could modulate the function of Ntg1. In this study, we mapped the specific sites of SUMO modification within Ntg1 and identified the enzymes responsible for sumoylating/desumoylating Ntg1. Using a non-sumoylatable version of Ntg1, ntg1ΔSUMO, we performed an initial assessment of the functional impact of Ntg1 SUMO modification in the cellular response to DNA damage. Finally, we demonstrate that, similar to Ntg1, the human homologue of Ntg1, NTHL1, can also be SUMO-modified in response to oxidative stress. Our results suggest that SUMO modification of BER proteins could be a conserved mechanism to coordinate cellular responses to DNA damage.     

SUMO: a history of modification

The small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is covalently linked to a variety of proteins and is deconjugated by SUMO-specific proteases. A characteristic of SUMO modification is that the biological consequences of conjugation do not appear proportionate to the small fraction of substrate that is modified. SUMO conjugation appears to alter the long-term fate of the modified protein even though the SUMO may be rapidly deconjugated. Thus an unmodified protein with a history of SUMO modification may have different properties from a protein that never has been modified. Here, the diverse effects of SUMO modification are discussed and models proposed to explain SUMO actions.     

Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) binding determines substrate recognition and paralog-selective SUMO modification

Small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs) regulate diverse cellular processes through their covalent attachment to target proteins. Vertebrates express three SUMO paralogs: SUMO-1, SUMO-2, and SUMO-3 (SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are approximately 96% identical and referred to as SUMO-2/3). SUMO-1 and SUMO-2/3 are conjugated, at least in part, to unique subsets of proteins and thus regulate distinct cellular pathways. However, how different proteins are selectively modified by SUMO-1 and SUMO-2/3 is unknown. We demonstrate that BLM, the RecQ DNA helicase mutated in Bloom syndrome, is preferentially modified by SUMO-2/3 both in vitro and in vivo. Our findings indicate that non-covalent interactions between SUMO and BLM are required for modification at non-consensus sites and that preferential SUMO-2/3 modification is determined by preferential SUMO-2/3 binding. We also present evidence that sumoylation of a C-terminal fragment of HIPK2 is dependent on SUMO binding, indicating that non-covalent interactions between SUMO and target proteins provide a general mechanism for SUMO substrate selection and possible paralog-selective modification.     

Versatile Recombinant SUMOylation System for the Production of SUMO-Modified Protein

Posttranslational modification by small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO) is being associated with a growing number of regulatory functions in diverse cellular processes. The biochemical investigation into the underlying molecular mechanisms, however, has been lagging behind due to the difficulty to generate sufficient amounts of recombinant SUMOylated proteins. Here, we present two newly designed two-component vector systems for the expression and purification of SUMO-modified target proteins in Escherichia coli. One system consists of a vector for SUMO conjugation, expressing human SUMO-activating (SAE1/SAE2) and conjugating (Ubc9) enzymes together with His₆-tagged SUMO1, 2 or 3, that can be combined with commonly used expression constructs for any gene of interest. To facilitate SUMOylation of targets normally requiring a SUMO-E3 ligase for efficient modification, a second system is designed to express the target protein as a fusion with the human SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9, thus compensating the absence of a potential SUMO ligase. We demonstrate the proficiency of these systems by SUMOylation of two DNA repair proteins, the thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and XRCC1, and describe purification schemes for SUMOylated proteins in native and active form. This SUMO toolbox facilitates “in-cell” and “in-extract” production and purification of recombinant SUMO-modified target proteins for functional and structural analysis.     

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification of natively unfolded proteins tau and alpha-synuclein

Sumoylation is an important post-translational modification that provides a rapid and reversible means for controlling the activity, subcellular localization, and stability of target proteins. We have examined the covalent attachment of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins to tau and alpha-synuclein, two natively unfolded proteins that define several neurodegenerative diseases. Both brain proteins were preferentially modified by SUMO1, as compared with SUMO2 or SUMO3. Tau contains two SUMO consensus sequences, and mutational analyses identified Lys(340) as the major sumoylation site. Although both tau and alpha-synuclein are targets for proteasomal degradation, only tau sumoylation was affected by inhibitors of the proteasome pathway. Tau is a microtubule-associated protein, whose ability to bind and stabilize microtubules is negatively regulated by phosphorylation. Treatment with the phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, or the microtubule depolymerizing drug, colchicine, up-regulated tau sumoylation. This suggests that SUMO modification may preferentially target a free soluble pool of the substrate. These findings revealed a new, possibly regulatory, modification of tau and alpha-synuclein that may also have implications for their pathogenic roles in neurodegenerative diseases.     

Phosphorylation of SUMO-1 occurs in vivo and is conserved through evolution

Protein dynamics is regulated by an elaborate interplay between different post-translational modifications. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are small proteins that are covalently conjugated to target proteins with important functional consequences. One such modifier is SUMO, which mainly modifies nuclear proteins. SUMO contains a unique N-terminal arm not present in ubiquitin and other Ubls, which functions in the formation of SUMO polymers. Here, we unambiguously show that serine 2 of the endogenous SUMO-1 N-terminal protrusion is phosphorylated in vivo using very high mass accuracy mass spectrometry at both the MS and the MS/MS level and complementary fragmentation techniques. Strikingly, we detected the same phosphorylation in yeast, Drosophila and human cells, suggesting an evolutionary conserved function for this modification. The nearly identical human SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 isoforms differ in serine 2; thus, only SUMO-3 could be phosphorylated at this position. Our finding that SUMO can be modified may point to an additional level of complexity through modifying a protein-modifier.     

Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9.

Conjugation of the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO-1/SMT3C/Sentrin-1 to proteins in vitro is dependent on a heterodimeric E1 (SAE1/SAE2) and an E2 (Ubc9). Although SUMO-2/SMT3A/Sentrin-3 and SUMO-3/SMT3B/Sentrin-2 share 50% sequence identity with SUMO-1, they are functionally distinct. Inspection of the SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 sequences indicates that they both contain the sequence psiKXE, which represents the consensus SUMO modification site. As a consequence SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9 catalyze the formation of polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 on protein substrates in vitro, and SUMO-2 chains are detected in vivo. The ability to form polymeric chains is not shared by SUMO-1, and although all SUMO species use the same conjugation machinery, modification by SUMO-1 and SUMO-2/-3 may have distinct functional consequences.     

SUMO modification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins

Small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs) are proteins that are posttranslationally conjugated to other cellular proteins, particularly those that localize and function in the nucleus. Enzymes regulating SUMO modification localize in part to nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), indicating that modification of some proteins may occur as they are translocated between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Substrates that are regulated by SUMO modification at NPCs, however, have not been previously identified. Among the most abundant cargos transported through NPCs are the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs). HnRNPs are involved in various aspects of mRNA biogenesis, including regulation of pre-mRNA splicing and nuclear export. Here, we demonstrate that two subsets of hnRNPs, the hnRNP C and M proteins, are substrates for SUMO modification. We demonstrate that the hnRNP C proteins are modified by SUMO at a single lysine residue, K237, and that SUMO modification at this site decreases their binding to nucleic acids. We also show that Nup358, a SUMO E3 ligase associated with the cytoplasmic fibrils of NPCs, enhances the SUMO modification of the hnRNP C and M proteins. Based on our findings, we propose that SUMO modification of the hnRNP C and M proteins may occur at NPCs and facilitate the nucleocytoplasmic transport of mRNAs.     

A universal strategy for proteomic studies of SUMO and other ubiquitin-like modifiers

Post-translational modification by the conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers is an essential mechanism to affect protein function. Currently, only a limited number of substrates are known for most of these modifiers, thus limiting our knowledge of their role and relevance for cellular physiology. Here, we report the development of a universal strategy for proteomic studies of ubiquitin-like modifiers. This strategy involves the development of stable transfected cell lines expressing a double-tagged modifier under the control of a tightly negatively regulated promoter, the induction of the expression and conjugation of the tagged modifier to cellular proteins, the tandem affinity purification of the pool of proteins covalently modified by the tagged modifier, and the identification of the modified proteins by LC and MS. By applying this methodology to the proteomic analysis of SUMO-1 and SUMO-3, we determined that SUMO-1 and SUMO-3 are stable proteins exhibiting half-lives of over 20 h, demonstrated that sumoylation with both SUMO-1 and SUMO-3 is greatly stimulated by MG-132 and heat shock treatment, demonstrated the preferential usage of either SUMO-1 or SUMO-3 for some known SUMO substrates, and identified 122 putative SUMO substrates of which only 27 appeared to be modified by both SUMO-1 and SUMO-3. This limited overlapping in the subset of proteins modified by SUMO-1 and SUMO-3 supports that the SUMO paralogues are likely to be functionally distinct. Three of the novel putative SUMO substrates identified, namely the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor PSF, the structural microtubular component alpha-tubulin, and the GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran, were confirmed as authentic SUMO substrates. The application of this universal strategy to the identification of the pool of cellular substrates modified by other ubiquitin-like modifiers will dramatically increase our knowledge of the biological role of the different ubiquitin-like conjugations systems in the cell.     

Analysis of Small Ubiquitin-Like Modifier (SUMO) Targets Reflects the Essential Nature of Protein SUMOylation and Provides Insight to Elucidate the Role of SUMO in Plant Development

Posttranslational modification of proteins by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) has received much attention, reflected by a flood of recent studies implicating SUMO in a wide range of cellular and molecular activities, many of which are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Whereas most of these studies were performed in vitro or in single cells, plants provide an excellent system to study the role of SUMO at the developmental level. Consistent with its essential roles during plant development, mutations of the basic SUMOylation machinery in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cause embryo stage arrest or major developmental defects due to perturbation of the dynamics of target SUMOylation. Efforts to identify SUMO protein targets in Arabidopsis have been modest; however, recent success in identifying thousands of human SUMO targets using unique experimental designs can potentially help identify plant SUMO targets more efficiently. Here, known Arabidopsis SUMO targets are reevaluated, and potential approaches to dissect the roles of SUMO in plant development are discussed.Protein structure, and hence function, is determined not only by the primary amino acids sequence dictated by its gene sequence, but also by the many modifications they receive co- and posttranslationally. Some of these modifications involve chemical changes of amino acids (such as citrullination, deamidation, and racemization), whereas others involve structural changes in proteins (such as formation of disulfide bridges and the maturation of a precursor protein by proteotytic cleavage). Other modifications involve addition of functional groups, such as in the cases of acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, etc., or even sometimes other peptides. These modifications result in different topologies and activities of mature proteins and hence increase the repertoire of cellular proteins tremendously and provide a vast source of variation beyond that determined at the DNA or RNA levels. Many of these modifications are reversible, and their effects, albeit crucial for normal growth, development, and response to environmental cues, might be subtle, presenting challenges for studies attempting to correlate these modifications with phenotypes. One such posttranslational modification involves the covalent attachment (conjugation) of a family of small proteins to target proteins. Ubiquitin is the founding member of these small protein modifiers; however, a superfamily of more than 12 ubiquitin-like (UBL) proteins have been characterized and shown to regulate various aspects of cellular activity through modulation of protein structure and function (Hochstrasser, 2009; Vierstra, 2012). Although they share only low similarity at the primary amino acid sequence, these protein modifiers share a conserved three-dimensional structure as well as similar overall enzymatic reactions that lead to their conjugation and deconjugation to target proteins (Vierstra, 2012), suggesting that they probably have an ancient and common origin. Consistent with this idea, the bacterial proteins ThiS and MoaD, which act as sulfur donors during the synthesis of Thiamine and Molybdenum cofactor, are structurally related to ubiquitin, and the enzymes required for their activation (ThiF and MoeB, respectively) are related to the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1; Fig. 1; see discussion below; for review, see Hochstrasser, 2009). Recent evidence reveals that a simple, but complete, ubiquitin system is present in three extant archaeal groups and hence proposes a preeukaryotic origin of the UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). During the evolution of eukaryotes, this system expanded greatly to give rise to all known UBLs and their conjugation and deconjugation enzymes, including those for small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), and it is believed that all these modifications existed in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (Grau-Bové et al., 2015). The ancient origins of these protein modification systems may explain why many of the cellular processes they regulate are conserved throughout eukaryotes. Attachment of ubiquitin and SUMO, specifically, play crucial roles in eukaryotic growth and development, and these two UBLs are the most important and extensively studied of all small protein modifiers. Interestingly, the evolutionary routes that the UBL system followed, particularly those of ubiquitin and SUMO, seem to have involved different mechanisms during the evolution of plants and other eukaryotes from their common eukaryotic ancestor, pointing to potential differences specific to plants while conserving core molecular and cellular processes regulated by these UBLs (Grau-Bové et al., 2015; N. Elrouby and S.R. Strickler, unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1. The SUMO conjugation and deconjugation system. SUMO is produced as a precursor protein with a C-terminal extension. SUMO proteases cleave off the C-terminal tail to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the C-terminal Gly. The SAE (or El) with its two subunits (SAE1 and SAE2) forms a thioester bond with this Gly residue to prepare for its transfer to the SCE (or E2). In addition to the thioester bond, the SCE binds SUMO noncovalently as well and eventually transfers SUMO to a target protein, usually with the aid of a third enzyme (E3), the SUMO ligase such as SIZ1. Targets, now covalently modified by SUMO through an isopeptide bond, perform specific functions, which are subsequently terminated by either removing SUMO from the target protein (deconjugation) or by regulated proteolysis. SUMO proteases with isopeptidase activity specifically and precisely hydrolyze the isopeptide bond, releasing free SUMO and target protein. Alternatively, a polySUMO chain forms through the activity of SUMO ligases (E4) such as PIAL1 and PIAL2, and this chain recruits STUbLs, which ubiquitinate both SUMO and the target protein and target them for degradation by the 26S proteasome. All gene models are derived from terminology in Arabidopsis. S, SUMO; Ub, ubiquitin; UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system.The enzymatic reactions that lead to the attachment of ubiquitin or SUMO to target proteins are very similar (Fig. 1). SUMO is produced as a precursor protein that contains two (in most SUMO isoforms) Gly residues near its C-terminal end (Novatchkova et al., 2004). A processing SUMO protease cleaves off the C-terminal end of the SUMO precursor to expose the reactive carboxyl group of the second Gly. Through an ATP-dependent pathway that involves three enzymatic activities (E1→E2→E3), the C-terminal end of mature SUMO eventually forms an isopeptide bond with the ε-amino group of a Lys residue in the target protein (Fig. 1; Dohmen, 2004). Target modification leads to a variety of effects (discussed below) that mainly regulate target protein activity, subcellular location, and interaction dynamics. However, unlike modification by ubiquitin (ubiquitination), which mainly leads to target degradation by a specialized multisubunit protease called the 26S proteasome, there is no evidence linking SUMOylation directly to target proteolysis (in some cases, modification of a protein by a polySUMO chain may lead to its ubiquitination, which itself targets the protein for degradation [see below]; Geiss-Friedlander and Melchior, 2007). Because most of our knowledge of the enzymology, structural biology, and functional implications of SUMOylation is derived from work performed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and mammalian cell lines, this article updates our knowledge of the field in general, with emphasis on relevant data from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) whenever possible and a focus on SUMO protein targets. Plants provide an ideal model system to study the roles of SUMO during development, and hence knowledge gleaned from studies of yeast and human SUMO may provide guidelines that will help advance our understanding of the roles of SUMO in plant development.     

Biosynthesis of SUMOylated Proteins in Bacteria Using the Trypanosoma brucei Enzymatic System

Post-translational modification with the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) is conserved in eukaryotic organisms and plays important regulatory roles in proteins affecting diverse cellular processes. In Trypanosoma brucei, member of one of the earliest branches in eukaryotic evolution, SUMO is essential for normal cell cycle progression and is likely to be involved in the epigenetic control of genes crucial for parasite survival, such as those encoding the variant surface glycoproteins. Molecular pathways modulated by SUMO have started to be discovered by proteomic studies; however, characterization of functional consequences is limited to a reduced number of targets. Here we present a bacterial strain engineered to produce SUMOylated proteins, by transferring SUMO from T. brucei together with the enzymes essential for its activation and conjugation. Due to the lack of background in E. coli, this system is useful to express and identify SUMOylated proteins directly in cell lysates by immunoblotting, and SUMOylated targets can be eventually purified for biochemical or structural studies. We applied this strategy to describe the ability of TbSUMO to form chains in vitro and to detect SUMOylation of a model substrate, PCNA both from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and from T. brucei. To further validate targets, we applied an in vitro deconjugation assay using the T. brucei SUMO-specific protease capable to revert the pattern of modification. This system represents a valuable tool for target validation, mutant generation and functional studies of SUMOylated proteins in trypanosomatids.     

Structural basis for regulation of poly‐SUMO chain by a SUMO‐like domain of Nip45

Post‐translational modification by small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) provides an important regulatory mechanism in diverse cellular processes. Modification of SUMO has been shown to target proteins involved in systems ranging from DNA repair pathways to the ubiquitin‐proteasome degradation system by the action of SUMO‐targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs). STUbLs recognize target proteins modified with a poly‐SUMO chain through their SUMO‐interacting motifs (SIMs). STUbLs are also associated with RENi family proteins, which commonly have two SUMO‐like domains (SLD1 and SLD2) at their C terminus. We have determined the crystal structures of SLD2 of mouse RENi protein, Nip45, in a free form and in complex with a mouse E2 sumoylation enzyme, Ubc9. While Nip45 SLD2 shares a β‐grasp fold with SUMO, the SIM interaction surface conserved in SUMO paralogues does not exist in SLD2. Biochemical data indicates that neither tandem SLDs or SLD2 of Nip45 bind to either tandem SIMs from either mouse STUbL, RNF4 or to those from SUMO‐binding proteins, whose interactions with SUMO have been well characterized. On the other hand, Nip45 SLD2 binds to Ubc9 in an almost identical manner to that of SUMO and thereby inhibits elongation of poly‐SUMO chains. This finding highlights a possible role of the RENi proteins in the modulation of Ubc9‐mediated poly‐SUMO formation. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K

Post-translational modification with small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) alters the function of many proteins, but the molecular mechanisms and consequences of this modification are still poorly defined. During a screen for novel SUMO1 targets, we identified the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K (Hip2). SUMO attachment severely impairs E2-25K ubiquitin thioester and unanchored ubiquitin chain formation in vitro. Crystal structures of E2-25K(1-155) and of the E2-25K(1-155)-SUMO conjugate (E2-25K(*)SUMO) indicate that SUMO attachment interferes with E1 interaction through its location on the N-terminal helix. The SUMO acceptor site in E2-25K, Lys14, does not conform to the consensus site found in most SUMO targets (PsiKXE), and functions only in the context of an alpha-helix. In contrast, adjacent SUMO consensus sites are modified only when in unstructured peptides. The demonstration that secondary structure elements are part of SUMO attachment signals could contribute to a better prediction of SUMO targets.