MqsR, a Crucial Regulator for Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation, Is a GCU-specific mRNA Interferase in Escherichia coli

The mqsR gene has been shown to be positively regulated by the quorum-sensing autoinducer AI-2, which in turn activates a two-component system, the qseB-qseC operon. This operon plays an important role in biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. However, its cellular function has remained unknown. Here, we found that 1 base downstream of mqsR there is a gene, ygiT, that is co-transcribed with mqsR. Induction of mqsR caused cell growth arrest, whereas ygiT co-induction recovered cell growth. We demonstrate that MqsR (98 amino acid residues), which has no homology to the well characterized mRNA interferase MazF, is a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis that functions by degrading cellular mRNAs. In vivo and in vitro primer extension experiments showed that MqsR is an mRNA interferase specifically cleaving mRNAs at GCU. The mRNA interferase activity of purified MqsR was inhibited by purified YgiT (131 residues). MqsR forms a stable 2:1 complex with YgiT, and the complex likely functions as a repressor for the mqsR-ygiT operon by specifically binding to two different palindromic sequences present in the 5′-untranslated region of this operon.It has been reported that quorum sensing is involved in biofilm formation (1–4). mqsR expression was found to be induced by 8-fold in biofilms (5) and also by the quorum-sensing signal autoinducer AI-2, which is a species-nonspecific signaling molecule produced by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including Escherichia coli (6). It has been reported that induction of mqsR activates a two-component system, the qseB-qseC operon, which is known to play an important role in biofilm formation (6). Thus, it has been proposed that MqsR (98 amino acid residues) is a regulator of biofilm formation because it activates qseB, which controls the flhDC expression required for motility and biofilm formation in E. coli (6). However, the cellular function of MqsR has remained unknown.Interestingly, all free-living bacteria examined to date contain a number of suicide or toxin genes in their genomes (7, 8). Many of these toxins are co-transcribed with their cognate antitoxins in an operon (termed toxin-antitoxin (TA)² operon) and form a stable complex in the cell, so their toxicity is subdued under normal growth conditions (9–11). However, the stability of antitoxins is substantially lower than that of their cognate toxins, so any stress causing cellular damage or growth inhibition that induces proteases alters the balance between toxin and antitoxin, leading to toxin release in the cell.To date, 16 (12) TA systems have been reported on the E. coli genome, including relB-relE (13, 14), chpBI-chpBK (15), mazEF (16–18), yefM-yoeB (19, 20), dinJ-yafQ (21, 22), hipBA and hicAB (23, 24), prlF-yhaV (25), and ybaJ-hha (26). Interestingly, all of these TA operons appear to use similar modes of regulation: the formation of complexes between antitoxins and their cognate toxins to neutralize toxin activity and the ability of TA complexes to autoregulate their expression. The cellular targets of some toxins have been identified. CcdB directly interacts with gyrase A and blocks DNA replication (27, 28). RelE, which by itself has no endoribonuclease activity, appears to act as a ribosome-associating factor that promotes mRNA cleavage at the ribosome A-site (13, 29, 30). PemK (31), ChpBK (15), and MazF (32) are unique among toxins because they target cellular mRNAs for degradation by functioning as sequence-specific endoribonucleases to effectively inhibit protein synthesis and thereby cell growth.MazF, ChpBK, and PemK have been characterized as sequence-specific endoribonucleases that cleave mRNA at the ACA, ACY (Y is U, A, or G), and UAH (H is C, A, or U) sequences, respectively. They are completely different from other known endoribonucleases such as RNases E, A, and T1, as these toxins function as protein synthesis inhibitors by interfering with the function of cellular mRNAs. It is well known that small RNAs, such as mRNA-interfering cRNA (33), microRNA (34), and small interfering RNA (35), interfere with the function of specific RNAs. These small RNAs bind to specific mRNAs to inhibit their expression. Ribozymes also act on their target RNAs specifically and interfere with their function (36). Therefore, MazF, ChpBK, and PemK homologs form a novel endoribonuclease family that exhibits a new mRNA-interfering mechanism by cleaving mRNAs at specific sequences. Thus, they have been termed “mRNA interferases” (2).During our search for TA systems on the E. coli genome, we found that the mqsR gene is co-transcribed with a downstream gene, ygiT. These two genes appear to function as a TA system, as their size is small (98 residues for MqsR and 131 residues for YgiT) and their respective open reading frames are separated by 1 bp. In this study, we demonstrate that MqsR-YgiT is a new E. coli TA system consisting of a toxin, MqsR, and an antitoxin, YgiT. Moreover, we identify MqsR as a novel mRNA interferase that does not exhibit homology to MazF. This toxin cleaves RNA at GCU sequences in vivo and in vitro. The implication of this finding as to how this mRNA interferase is involved in cell physiology and biofilm formation will be discussed.     

Role of the gerI Operon of Bacillus cereus 569 in the Response of Spores to Germinants

Bacillus cereus 569 (ATCC 10876) germinates in response to inosine or to l-alanine, but the most rapid germination response is elicited by a combination of these germinants. Mutants defective in their germination response to either inosine or to l-alanine were isolated after Tn917-LTV1 mutagenesis and enrichment procedures; one class of mutant could not germinate in response to inosine as a sole germinant but still germinated in response to l-alanine, although at a reduced rate; another mutant germinated normally in response to inosine but was slowed in its germination response to l-alanine. These mutants demonstrated that at least two signal response pathways are involved in the triggering of germination. Stimulation of germination in l-alanine by limiting concentrations of inosine and stimulation of germination in inosine by low concentrations of l-alanine were still detectable in these mutants, suggesting that such stimulation is not dependent on complete functionality of both these germination loci. Two transposon insertions that affected inosine germination were found to be located 2.2 kb apart on the chromosome. This region was cloned and sequenced, revealing an operon of three open reading frames homologous to those in the gerA and related operons of Bacillus subtilis. The individual genes of this gerI operon have been named gerIA, gerIB, and gerIC. The GerIA protein is predicted to possess an unusually long, charged, N-terminal domain containing nine tandem copies of a 13-amino-acid glutamine- and serine-rich sequence.Bacillus species have the ability, under certain nutrient stresses, to undergo a complex differentiation process resulting in the formation of a highly resistant dormant endospore (6). These spores can then persist in the environment for prolonged periods until a sensitive response mechanism detects specific environmental conditions, initiating the processes of germination and outgrowth (9, 21, 25). Germination can be initiated by a variety of agents (12), including nutrients, enzymes, or physical factors, such as abrasion or hydrostatic pressure.The molecular genetics of spore germination has been most extensively studied in Bacillus subtilis 168 (21). B. subtilis spores can be triggered to germinate in response to either l-alanine or to a combination (29) of asparagine, glucose, fructose, and potassium ions (AGFK). Mutants of B. subtilis which are defective in germination responses to one or to both types of germinant have been isolated previously (20, 27). Analysis of these mutants suggests that the germinants interact with separate germinant-specific complexes within the spore (21). This in some way leads to activation of components of the germination apparatus common to both responses, such as germination-specific cortex lytic enzymes, leading in turn to complete germination of the spore (10, 22). The mutations within the gerA operon of B. subtilis specifically block germination initiated by l-alanine (34). The predicted amino acid sequences of the three GerA proteins encoded in the operon suggest that these proteins could be membrane associated, and they are the most likely candidates to represent the germinant receptor for alanine (21).The amino acid l-alanine has been identified as a common but not universal germinant in a variety of Bacillus species, often requiring the presence of adjuncts such as electrolytes and sugars. Ribosides, such as inosine, represent another type of common germinant, although many species are unable to germinate rapidly in response to these without the addition of l-alanine (9).The food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus is a major cause of food poisoning of an emetic and diarrheal type (13, 16). The germination and growth of Bacillus cereus spores during food storage can lead to food spoilage and the potential to cause food poisoning (16). B. cereus has been shown to germinate in response to l-alanine and to ribosides (11, 18, 23). Spore germination can be triggered by l-alanine alone, but at high spore densities this response becomes inhibited by d-alanine, generated by the alanine racemase activity associated with the spores (8, 11). This auto-inhibition of l-alanine germination can be reduced by the inclusion of a racemase inhibitor (O-carbamyl-d-serine) with the germinating spores (11).Inosine is the most effective riboside germinant for B. cereus T, while adenosine and guanosine are less potent (28). The rate of riboside-triggered germination has been reported to be enhanced dramatically by the addition of l-alanine (18). It is unclear whether ribosides can act as a sole germinant, or whether there is an absolute requirement for l-alanine (28).An attempt has been made to analyze genetically the molecular components of the germination apparatus in B. cereus in order to dissect the germination responses of this species and to determine whether riboside-induced germination involves components related to those already described for amino acid and sugar germinants in B. subtilis.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]