Mechanisms of long-term plasticity of hippocampal GABAergic synapses

Long-term potentiation and depression of synaptic transmission have been considered as cellular mechanisms of memory in studies conducted in recent decades. These studies were predominantly focused on mechanisms underlying plasticity at excitatory synapses. Nevertheless, normal central nervous system functioning requires maintenance of a balance between inhibition and excitation, suggesting existence of similar modulation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. Here we review the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptors in the generation of long-term changes in synaptic transmission of inhibitory synapses. We considered the role of endocannabinoid and glutamate systems, GABA_B and opioid receptors in the induction of long-term potentiation and long-term depression in inhibitory synapses. The preand postsynaptic effects of activation of these receptors are also discussed.     

Stability of complex spike timing-dependent plasticity in cerebellar learning

Dynamics of spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity are analyzed for excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto cerebellar Purkinje cells. The purpose of this study is to place theoretical constraints on candidate synaptic learning rules that determine the changes in synaptic efficacy due to pairing complex spikes with presynaptic spikes in parallel fibers and inhibitory interneurons. Constraints are derived for the timing between complex spikes and presynaptic spikes, constraints that result from the stability of the learning dynamics of the learning rule. Potential instabilities in the parallel fiber synaptic learning rule are found to be stabilized by synaptic plasticity at inhibitory synapses if the inhibitory learning rules are stable, and conditions for stability of inhibitory plasticity are given. Combining excitatory with inhibitory plasticity provides a mechanism for minimizing the overall synaptic input. Stable learning rules are shown to be able to sculpt simple-spike patterns by regulating the excitability of neurons in the inferior olive that give rise to climbing fibers.     

Long-term plasticity at inhibitory synapses

Experience-dependent modifications of neural circuits and function are believed to heavily depend on changes in synaptic efficacy such as LTP/LTD. Hence, much effort has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms underlying these forms of synaptic plasticity. Although most of this work has focused on excitatory synapses, it is now clear that diverse mechanisms of long-term inhibitory plasticity have evolved to provide additional flexibility to neural circuits. By changing the excitatory/inhibitory balance, GABAergic plasticity can regulate excitability, neural circuit function and ultimately, contribute to learning and memory, and neural circuit refinement. Here we discuss recent advancements in our understanding of the mechanisms and functional relevance of GABAergic inhibitory synaptic plasticity.     

Acquiring new information in a neuronal network: from Hebb's concept to homeostatic plasticity

Synaptic plasticity is the cellular mechanism underlying the phenomena of learning and memory. Much of the research on synaptic plasticity is based on the postulate of Hebb (1949) who proposed that, when a neuron repeatedly takes part in the activation of another neuron, the efficacy of the connections between these neurons is increased. Plasticity has been extensively studied, and often demonstrated through the processes of LTP (Long Term Potentiation) and LTD (Long Term Depression), which represent an increase and a decrease of the efficacy of long-term synaptic transmission. This review summarizes current knowledge concerning the cellular mechanisms of LTP and LTD, whether at the level of excitatory synapses, which have been the most studied, or at the level of inhibitory synapses. However, if we consider neuronal networks rather than the individual synapses, the consequences of synaptic plasticity need to be considered on a large scale to determine if the activity of networks are changed or not. Homeostatic plasticity takes into account the mechanisms which control the efficacy of synaptic transmission for all the synaptic inputs of a neuron. Consequently, this new concept deals with the coordinated activity of excitatory and inhibitory networks afferent to a neuron which maintain a controlled level of excitability during the acquisition of new information related to the potentiation or to the depression of synaptic efficacy. We propose that the protocols of stimulation used to induce plasticity at the synaptic level set up a "homeostatic potentiation" or a "homeostatic depression" of excitation and inhibition at the level of the neuronal networks. The coordination between excitatory and inhibitory circuits allows the neuronal networks to preserve a level of stable activity, thus avoiding episodes of hyper- or hypo-activity during the learning and memory phases.     

HCN1 channels constrain synaptically evoked Ca2+ spikes in distal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons

HCN1 hyperpolarization-activated cation channels act as an inhibitory constraint of both spatial learning and synaptic integration and long-term plasticity in the distal dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. However, as HCN1 channels provide an excitatory current, the mechanism of their inhibitory action remains unclear. Here we report that HCN1 channels also constrain CA1 distal dendritic Ca2+ spikes, which have been implicated in the induction of LTP at distal excitatory synapses. Our experimental and computational results indicate that HCN1 channels provide both an active shunt conductance that decreases the temporal integration of distal EPSPs and a tonic depolarizing current that increases resting inactivation of T-type and N-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, which contribute to the Ca2+ spikes. This dual mechanism may provide a general means by which HCN channels regulate dendritic excitability.     

Plasticity of GABAergic synapses in the neonatal rat hippocampus

While the development and plasticity of excitatory synaptic connections have been studied into detail, little is known about the development of inhibitory synapses. As proposed for excitatory synapses, recent studies have indicated that activity-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, may play a role in the establishment of functional inhibitory synaptic connections. Here, I review these different forms of plasticity and focus on their possible role in the developing neuronal network.     

Activity-dependent regulation of vesicular glutamate and GABA transporters: a means to scale quantal size

The functional balance of glutamatergic and GABAergic signaling in neuronal cortical circuits is under homeostatic control. That is, prolonged alterations of global network activity leads to opposite changes in quantal amplitude at glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. Such scaling of excitatory and inhibitory transmission within cortical circuits serves to restore and maintain a constant spontaneous firing rate of pyramidal neurons. Our recent work shows that this includes alterations in the levels of expression of vesicular glutamate (VGLUT1 and VGLUT2) and GABA (VIAAT) transporters. Other vesicle markers, such as synaptophysin or synapsin, are not regulated in this way. Endogenous regulation at the level of mRNA and synaptic protein controls the number of transporters per vesicle and hence, the level of vesicle filling with transmitter. Bidirectional and opposite activity-dependent regulation of VGLUT1 and VIAAT expression would serve to adjust the balance of glutamate and GABA release and therefore the level of postsynaptic receptor saturation. In some excitatory neurons and synapses, co-expression of VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 occurs. Bidirectional and opposite changes in the levels of two excitatory vesicular transporters would enable individual neocortical neurons to scale up or scale down the level of vesicular glutamate storage, and thus, the amount available for release at individual synapses. Regulated vesicular transmitter storage and release via selective changes in the level of expression of vesicular glutamate and GABA transporters indicates that homeostatic plasticity of synaptic strength at cortical synapses includes presynaptic elements.     

D-Serine and Glycine Differentially Control Neurotransmission during Visual Cortex Critical Period

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play a central role in synaptic plasticity. Their activation requires the binding of both glutamate and d-serine or glycine as co-agonist. The prevalence of either co-agonist on NMDA-receptor function differs between brain regions and remains undetermined in the visual cortex (VC) at the critical period of postnatal development. Here, we therefore investigated the regulatory role that d-serine and/or glycine may exert on NMDARs function and on synaptic plasticity in the rat VC layer 5 pyramidal neurons of young rats. Using selective enzymatic depletion of d-serine or glycine, we demonstrate that d-serine and not glycine is the endogenous co-agonist of synaptic NMDARs required for the induction and expression of Long Term Potentiation (LTP) at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Glycine on the other hand is not involved in synaptic efficacy per se but regulates excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission by activating strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors, then producing a shunting inhibition that controls neuronal gain and results in a depression of synaptic inputs at the somatic level after dendritic integration. In conclusion, we describe for the first time that in the VC both D-serine and glycine differentially regulate somatic depolarization through the activation of distinct synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors.     

Glutamate receptor dynamics in dendritic microdomains

Among diverse factors regulating excitatory synaptic transmission, the abundance of postsynaptic glutamate receptors figures prominently in molecular memory and learning-related synaptic plasticity. To allow for both long-term maintenance of synaptic transmission and acute changes in synaptic strength, the relative rates of glutamate receptor insertion and removal must be tightly regulated. Interactions with scaffolding proteins control the targeting and signaling properties of glutamate receptors within the postsynaptic membrane. In addition, extrasynaptic receptor populations control the equilibrium of receptor exchange at synapses and activate distinct signaling pathways involved in plasticity. Here, we review recent findings that have shaped our current understanding of receptor mobility between synaptic and extrasynaptic compartments at glutamatergic synapses, focusing on AMPA and NMDA receptors. We also examine the cooperative relationship between intracellular trafficking and surface diffusion of glutamate receptors that underlies the expression of learning-related synaptic plasticity.     

Endocannabinoid-mediated metaplasticity in the hippocampus

Repetitive activation of glutamatergic fibers that normally induces long-term potentiation (LTP) at excitatory synapses in the hippocampus also triggers long-term depression at inhibitory synapses (I-LTD) via retrograde endocannabinoid signaling. Little is known, however, about the physiological significance of I-LTD. Here, we show that synaptic-driven release of endocannabinoids is a highly localized and efficient process that strongly depresses cannabinoid-sensitive inhibitory inputs within the dendritic compartment of CA1 pyramidal cells. By removing synaptic inhibition in a restricted area of the dendritic tree, endocannabinoids selectively "primed" nearby excitatory synapses, thereby facilitating subsequent induction of LTP. This induction of local metaplasticity is a novel mechanism by which endocannabinoids can contribute to the storage of information in the brain.     

Bidirectional synaptic plasticity regulated by phosphorylation of stargazin-like TARPs

Synaptic plasticity involves protein phosphorylation cascades that alter the density of AMPA-type glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses; however, the crucial phosphorylated substrates remain uncertain. Here, we show that the AMPA receptor-associated protein stargazin is quantitatively phosphorylated and that stargazin phosphorylation promotes synaptic trafficking of AMPA receptors. Synaptic NMDA receptor activity can induce both stargazin phosphorylation, via activation of CaMKII and PKC, and stargazin dephosphorylation, by activation of PP1 downstream of PP2B. At hippocampal synapses, long-term potentiation and long-term depression require stargazin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, respectively. These results establish stargazin as a critical substrate in the bidirectional control of synaptic strength, which is thought to underlie aspects of learning and memory.     

Fast and slow excitation of inhibitory cells in the CA3 region of the hippocampus

Pyramidal cells form excitatory synaptic connections with local inhibitory neurons in the hippocampus. This recurrent synapse plays a crucial stabilizing role in the control of hippocampal activity, since it transforms pyramidal cell population. Using a combination of dual recording from presynaptic and postsynaptic cells and anatomical techniques, we show that these synaptic connections often comprise a single site for liberation of excitatory transmitter. The resulting excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSCs) have a fast time course and a similar amplitude to miniature EPSCs recorded in tetrodotoxin and cobalt. In contrast, activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) by transmitter liberated during repetitive activation of these synapses produces an excitation with a much slower time course. In addition to somatodendritic mGluRs, which excite inhibitory cells, a different species of mGluR is present on inhibitory cell terminals. This mGluR is activated by higher concentrations of the agonist t-1-amino-cyclopentyl–1,3-decarboxylate and acts to reduce γ-aminobutyric acid release. mGluRs, thus, have a dual action to enhance and to depress synaptic inhibition in the hippocampus. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Endocannabinoids Differentially Modulate Synaptic Plasticity in Rat Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons

Background

Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons receive two excitatory glutamatergic synaptic inputs: their most distal dendritic regions in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) are innervated by the perforant path (PP), originating from layer III of the entorhinal cortex, while their more proximal regions of the apical dendrites in the stratum radiatum (SR) are innervated by the Schaffer-collaterals (SC), originating from hippocampal CA3 neurons. Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are naturally occurring mediators capable of modulating both GABAergic and glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity via the CB1 receptor. Previous work on eCB modulation of excitatory synapses in the CA1 region largely focuses on the SC pathway. However, little information is available on whether and how eCBs modulate glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity at PP synapses.

Methodology/Principal Findings

By employing somatic and dendritic patch-clamp recordings, Ca²⁺ uncaging, and immunostaining, we demonstrate that there are significant differences in low-frequency stimulation (LFS)- or DHPG-, an agonist of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), induced long-term depression (LTD) of excitatory synaptic transmission between SC and PP synapses in the same pyramidal neurons. These differences are eliminated by pharmacological inhibition with selective CB1 receptor antagonists or genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor, indicating that these differences likely result from differential modulation via a CB1 receptor-dependent mechanism. We also revealed that depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE), a form of short-term synaptic plasticity, and photolysis of caged Ca²⁺-induced suppression of Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were less at the PP than that at the SC. In addition, application of WIN55212 (WIN) induced a more pronounced inhibition of EPSCs at the SC when compared to that at the PP.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results suggest that CB1 dependent LTD and DSE are differentially expressed at the PP versus SC synapses in the same neurons, which may have an impact on synaptic scaling, integration and plasticity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.     

Kalirin-7 controls activity-dependent structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines

Activity-dependent rapid structural and functional modifications of central excitatory synapses contribute to synapse maturation, experience-dependent plasticity, and learning and memory and are associated with neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. However, the signal transduction mechanisms that link glutamate receptor activation to intracellular effectors that accomplish structural and functional plasticity are not well understood. Here we report that NMDA receptor activation in pyramidal neurons causes CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) kalirin-7 at residue threonine 95, regulating its GEF activity, leading to activation of small GTPase Rac1 and rapid enlargement of existing spines. Kalirin-7 also interacts with AMPA receptors and controls their synaptic expression. By demonstrating that kalirin expression and spine localization are required for activity-dependent spine enlargement and enhancement of AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission, our study identifies a signaling pathway that controls structural and functional spine plasticity.     

TRPV1 channels mediate long-term depression at synapses on hippocampal interneurons

TRPV1 receptors have classically been defined as heat-sensitive, ligand-gated, nonselective cation channels that integrate nociceptive stimuli in sensory neurons. TRPV1 receptors have also been identified in the brain, but their physiological role is poorly understood. Here we report that TRPV1 channel activation is necessary and sufficient to trigger long-term synaptic depression (LTD). Excitatory synapses onto hippocampal interneurons were depressed by either capsaicin, a potent TRPV1 channel activator, or the endogenously released eicosanoid, 12-(S)-HPETE, whereas neighboring excitatory synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cells were unaffected. TRPV1 receptor antagonists also prevented interneuron LTD. In brain slices from TRPV1-/- mice, LTD was absent, and neither capsaicin nor 12-(S)-HPETE elicited synaptic depression. Our results suggest that, in the hippocampus, TRPV1 receptor activation selectively modifies synapses onto interneurons. Like other forms of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, TRPV1-mediated LTD may have a role in long-term changes in physiological and pathological circuit behavior during learning and epileptic activity.     

Shift in the intrinsic excitability of medial prefrontal cortex neurons following training in impulse control and cued-responding tasks

Impulse control is an executive process that allows animals to inhibit their actions until an appropriate time. Previously, we reported that learning a simple response inhibition task increases AMPA currents at excitatory synapses in the prelimbic region of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, we examined whether modifications to intrinsic excitability occurred alongside the synaptic changes. To that end, we trained rats to obtain a food reward in a response inhibition task by withhold responding on a lever until they were signaled to respond. We then measured excitability, using whole-cell patch clamp recordings in brain slices, by quantifying action potentials generated by the injection of depolarizing current steps. Training in this task depressed the excitability of layer V pyramidal neurons of the prelimbic, but not infralimbic, region of the mPFC relative to behavioral controls. This decrease in maximum spiking frequency was significantly correlated with performance on the final session of the task. This change in intrinsic excitability may represent a homeostatic mechanism counterbalancing increased excitatory synaptic inputs onto those neurons in trained rats. Interestingly, subjects trained with a cue that predicted imminent reward availability had increased excitability in infralimbic, but not the prelimbic, pyramidal neurons. This dissociation suggests that both prelimbic and infralimbic neurons are involved in directing action, but specialized for different types of information, inhibitory or anticipatory, respectively.     

Lateral thinking: CaMKII uncouples kainate receptors from mossy fibre synapses

EMBO J (2013) 32: 496–510 doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.334; published online January042013Alteration of the efficacy of excitatory synaptic transmission between neurons is a critical element in the processes of learning, memory, and behaviour. Despite decades of research aimed at elucidating basic cellular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, new pathways and permutations continue to be discovered. Carta et al (2013) now show that activation of the calcium/calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaMKII) induces an unusual postsynaptic form of long-term depression (LTD) at the hippocampal mossy fibre synapse by promoting lateral diffusion of kainate receptors (KARs), a family of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) that influence pyramidal neuron excitability. This report therefore reveals a new and mechanistically unique way of fine-tuning synaptic plasticity at this central synapse in the hippocampus.Information transfer within the nervous system is regulated at the synaptic level by diverse cellular mechanisms. Synaptic efficacy is not static (i.e., it is ‘plastic''), and the capacity to adjust the strength of communication between neurons in a network has been shown to be a critical component of diverse aspects of brain function that include many forms of behavioural learning (Martin et al, 2000). The complex means by which neurons adjust their synaptic properties in response to changes in local and global activity in the central nervous system has been the subject of intensive investigation spanning multiple decades (Malenka and Bear, 2004; Feldman, 2009). Nonetheless, new mechanisms underlying plasticity of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission continue to be elucidated; these can vary depending on the experimental parameters for induction of plasticity, the particular type of synapse under investigation, and even the prior history of activation at the synapse. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and LTD of excitatory synaptic transmission are two well-known phenomena in which efficacy is increased or decreased, respectively, and at many synapses in the CNS occur through concomitant alterations in the number of postsynaptic iGluRs. The movement of excitatory receptors in and out of synapses, and more generally to and from the neuronal plasma membrane, is dictated by their association with a wide variety of scaffolding and chaperone proteins, whose interactions are often controlled by various protein kinases (Anggono and Huganir, 2012).It is generally appreciated now that long-term synaptic plasticity can be elicited by a variety of mechanisms even within a single type of synaptic connection. In addition to postsynaptic alterations in receptor content, for example, synaptic efficacy can also be tuned by regulated alterations in the probability of vesicular release of the neurotransmitter. Until recently, this presynaptic form of plasticity was thought to be the exclusive mechanism for altering excitatory synaptic strength at a morphologically unusual synapse in the hippocampus formed between large bouton-like presynaptic terminals arising from granule cell axons, or mossy fibres, and proximal dendrites on CA3 pyramidal neurons (Nicoll and Schmitz, 2005). These synaptic connections allow for single dentate granule cells to profoundly influence the likelihood of action potential firing in CA3 pyramidal neurons in a frequency-dependent manner, and for that reason have been referred to as ‘conditional detonator'' synapses (Henze et al, 2002). The precise mechanisms that lead to increased vesicular release probability following LTP-inducing stimulation of mossy fibre axons, including a potential role for retrograde signalling, remain the subject of debate, although there is general consensus that activation of presynaptic protein kinase A (PKA) is a key step in this form of synaptic plasticity (Figure 1A). Enhancing release probability impacts signalling through all three types of iGluRs present at mossy fibre synapses—AMPA, NMDA, and KARs. Recently, however, novel postsynaptic forms of mossy fibre plasticity were discovered in which induction protocols specifically increased the number of NMDA receptors (Kwon and Castillo, 2008; Rebola et al, 2008) or decreased the number of KARs (Selak et al, 2009), expanding the mechanistic repertoire at this historical site of focus of research on presynaptic LTP. Alterations in the synaptic content of particular iGluRs could serve as an additional means to fine-tune synaptic integration at the mossy fibre—CA3 synapse and therefore have important consequences for hippocampal network excitability.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Kainate receptor-dependent plasticity mechanisms at the hippocampal mossy fibre–CA3 synapse. (A) Activation of presynaptic receptors enhances glutamate release from the mossy fibre terminals. (B) A spike-timing-dependent plasticity protocol known to activate postsynaptic CaMKII results in long-term synaptic depression. CaMKII phosphorylates the GluK5 kainate receptor subunit, which uncouples the receptor from PSD-95 in the postsynaptic density. This leads to an increase in receptor mobility and diffusion away from the synapse. (C) Low-frequency stimulation of mossy fibres and activation of postsynaptic group 1 mGluRs leads to activation of PKC, which promotes the association of SNAP-25 to the GluK5 kainate receptor subunit and the subsequent endocytosis of synaptic receptors.In this issue, Carta et al (2013) identify a new postsynaptic mechanism for shaping mossy fibre plasticity that is specific to synaptic KARs, which serve to influence temporal integration of synaptic input as well as pyramidal neuron excitability through modulation of intrinsic ion channels. The authors paired postsynaptic depolarization of CA3 pyramidal neurons with a precisely timed presynaptic release of glutamate in a pattern that is known to produce LTP at many central synapses (Feldman, 2012). At mossy fibre synapses, however, this form of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) instead caused LTD of KAR-mediated excitatory synaptic potentials (KAR-LTD) while leaving AMPA receptor function unaltered (Figure 1B) (Carta et al, 2013). Using a series of genetic and pharmacological manipulations, Carta et al (2013) found that KAR-LTD was dependent upon the activation of postsynaptic KARs themselves, a rise in postsynaptic Ca²⁺, and CaMKII phosphorylation of a specific protein component of synaptic KARs, the GluK5 subunit. Unlike other mechanisms of postsynaptic mossy fibre plasticity, KAR-LTD was independent of NMDA or metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Most surprisingly, KAR-LTD did not require receptor endocytosis from the plasma membrane, as is the case with most other forms of postsynaptic depression of excitatory transmission, including a distinct form of KAR-LTD reported previously (Selak et al, 2009) (Figure 1C). Instead, CaMKII-mediated phosphorylation of GluK5 subunits likely uncoupled receptors from the postsynaptic scaffolding protein PSD-95, which then led to enhanced lateral diffusion of KARs out of mossy fibre synapses. As KAR endocytosis was not altered in mossy fibre STDP, the activity-dependent reduction in KAR signalling was effectively limited to those receptors in the synapse. A molecular replacement strategy was employed using biolistic-based expression of mutant KARs in cultured hippocampal slices prepared from KAR knockout mice, which allowed Carta et al (2013) to corroborate their detailed biochemical studies by showing that reconstituted KAR currents in CA3 neurons expressing recombinant GluK5 phosphorylation site substitutions were unable to express KAR-LTD. In summary, KAR-mediated activation of CaMKII leads to phosphorylation of the GluK5 subunit and subsequent KAR-LTD through enhanced lateral mobility of synaptic receptors (Figure 1B).These findings are intriguing for several reasons. Most notably, they stand in stark contrast to studies in which CaMKII activation primarily triggers potentiation, rather than depression, of excitatory synaptic transmission at other synapses (Lisman et al, 2012). CaMKII recently was shown to cause diffusional trapping of AMPA receptor complexes within the postsynaptic density following phosphorylation of a closely associated auxiliary subunit, stargazin (Opazo et al, 2010), which is precisely the opposite of the effects of activation of the enzyme on KAR mobility at mossy fibre synapses. Further, these divergent consequences are both dependent upon carboxy-terminal PDZ interactions with scaffolding proteins, although in each case further research is needed to dissect out the relevant binding partners that control lateral mobility. It is of interest that KAR-LTD required synaptic activation of KARs to initiate signalling via CaMKII, which implies a tight coupling exists between KARs and the holoenzyme in the mossy fibre postsynaptic density. This observation also raises the possibility that activated CaMKII could phosphorylate other targets to effect other, yet-to-be-discovered, changes in synaptic function. Finally, the report by Carta et al expands our understanding of how excitatory synaptic transmission is fine-tuned at an important central synapse and underscores the fact that even well-trod ground (or synapses) continue to yield surprises that inform our understanding of the remarkable mechanistic diversity underlying synaptic plasticity in the CNS.     

Presynaptic LTP and LTD of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses

Ubiquitous forms of long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) are caused by enduring increases or decreases in neurotransmitter release. Such forms or presynaptic plasticity are equally observed at excitatory and inhibitory synapses and the list of locations expressing presynaptic LTP and LTD continues to grow. In addition to the mechanistically distinct forms of postsynaptic plasticity, presynaptic plasticity offers a powerful means to modify neural circuits. A wide range of induction mechanisms has been identified, some of which occur entirely in the presynaptic terminal, whereas others require retrograde signaling from the postsynaptic to presynaptic terminals. In spite of this diversity of induction mechanisms, some common induction rules can be identified across synapses. Although the precise molecular mechanism underlying long-term changes in transmitter release in most cases remains unclear, increasing evidence indicates that presynaptic LTP and LTD can occur in vivo and likely mediate some forms of learning.At several excitatory and inhibitory synapses, neuronal activity can trigger enduring increases or decreases in neurotransmitter release, thereby producing long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic strength, respectively. In the last decade, many studies have revealed that these forms of plasticity are ubiquitously expressed in the mammalian brain, and accumulating evidence indicates that they may underlie behavioral adaptations occurring in vivo. These studies have also uncovered a wide range of induction mechanisms, which converge on the presynaptic terminal where an enduring modification in the neurotransmitter release process takes place. Interestingly, presynaptic forms of LTP/LTD can coexist with classical forms of postsynaptic plasticity. Such diversity expands the dynamic range and repertoire by which neurons modify their synaptic connections. This review discusses mechanistic aspects of presynaptic LTP and LTD at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the mammalian brain, with an emphasis on recent findings.     

Gating of action potential propagation by an axonal A-like potassium conductance in the hippocampus: a new type of non-synaptic plasticity.

Synaptic plasticity is usually considered as the main form of activity-dependent functional plasticity in the mammalian brain. Short- and long-term regulation of synaptic transmission have been shown in various types of excitatory synapses including cortical and hippocampal synapses. In this review, we discuss a novel form of non-synaptic plasticity that involves voltage-gated K+ conductances in CA3 pyramidal cell axons. With experimental and theoretical arguments, we show that axons cannot only be considered as a simple structure that transmit reliably the action potential (AP) from the cell body to the nerve terminals. The axon is also able to express conduction failures in specific axonal pathways. We discuss possible physiological conditions in which these axonal plasticity may occur and its incidence on hippocampal network properties.     

Comparing fluctuations of synaptic responses mediated via AMPA and NMDA receptor channels--implications for synaptic plasticity

Glutamate-releasing synapses are essential in fast neuronal signalling. Plasticity at these synapses is important for learning and memory as well as for the activity-dependent control of neuronal development. We have evaluated the trial-to-trial fluctuations of excitatory postsynaptic currents mediated by glutamate receptors of the AMPA and NMDA types in CA1 pyramidal cells. By using the whole cell patch clamp technique in brain slices from young rats, we have demonstrated that the relative variability of AMPA and NMDA receptor mediated responses, expressed as the coefficient of variation, is similar for these two types of responses [Brain Res. 800 (1998) 253-259]. The present paper summarizes and discusses these results in relation to current theories on hippocampal synaptic plasticity, especially with regard to the ideas of glutamate spillover and silent synapses. Our finding of a correspondence between AMPA and NMDA responses with respect to fluctuations is compatible with our previous finding of equal relative changes of the two during activity induced synaptic plasticity. However, the results argue against the glutamate spillover model according to which the effect of glutamate--and hence the induction of plasticity--may spread unspecifically between synapses. But how can silent synapses become functional if no spread of glutamate occurs and no initial signal is present to trigger the functionalization? Is it necessary that NMDA responses are present at these synapses, which are then silent merely with respect to AMPA receptors, or do other alternatives exist? Our discussion aims to elucidate these questions.