Oestradiol and the preovulatory surges of luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in ewes during the breeding season and transition into anoestrus

This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h⁻¹; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h⁻¹; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h⁻¹. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml⁻¹, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml⁻¹ in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml⁻¹) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.     

Interactions between 17 beta-estradiol and the hypothalamo-pituitary beta-endorphin system in the regulation of the cyclic LH secretion

This paper further substantiates the physiological role of beta-endorphin (beta-END) in the control of the cyclic LH secretion and provides new data on the interactions between 17 beta-estradiol (17 beta-E2) and beta-END at both the hypothalamic and pituitary levels. At the hypothalamic level, during the estrous cycle in rats, beta-END concentrations were highest on diestrus I in the arcuate nucleus, median preoptic area and median eminence and lowest at the time of the preovulatory 17 beta-E2 surge on proestrus, before the subsequent preovulatory hypothalamic GnRH and plasma LH surges. Data obtained in ovariectomized 17 beta-E2-treated ewes support the direct involvement of 17 beta-E2 in changes in beta-END and GnRH concentrations in these hypothalamic areas. At the anterior pituitary level, in vitro results obtained using anterior pituitaries from the proestrus morning cycling female rat have shown that 17 beta-E2 strongly suppresses beta-END secretion and that GnRH stimulates the release of beta-END. Furthermore, marked fluctuations were observed for plasma beta-END throughout the menstrual cycle in the woman. Low beta-END concentrations were observed in the period preceding the LH preovulatory surge. Taken together, these results show that: (1) decreases in hypothalamic beta-END concentrations, which are controlled at least by circulating levels of 17 beta-E2, modulate GnRH synthesis and/or release and contribute to the mechanisms which initiate the LH surge; (2) anterior pituitary beta-END might be involved in the mechanisms which terminate the LH surge.     

Progesterone blockade of the positive feedback effects of 17β oestradiol in the ewe

Ovariectomized ewes (n = 24) were treated with implants that resulted in circulating concentrations of progesterone and 17β-oestradiol similar to those seen in intact ewes in the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle. Progesterone implants were left in for 10 days, and 17β-oestradiol implants for 14 days. Twelve of these ewes received daily injections of 17β-oestradiol in oil (i.m.) at doses sufficient to cause a surge release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the absence of progesterone. The other 12 ewes were treated daily with vehicle (oil). Following progesterone withdrawal on Day 10, each group of 12 ewes was divided into three subgroups. Ewes in each subgroup of the groups treated daily with 17β-oestradiol or vehicle, received an injection of either 17β-oestradiol (oil i.m.), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) (saline, i.v.) or vehicle, 24 h after progesterone withdrawal. Following progesterone withdrawal, no LH surge was detected in ewes treated with vehicle. Surge secretion of LH was detected in ewes of all other groups. The data suggested that in progesterone-treated ewes, daily exposure to stimulatory doses of 17β-oestradiol did not desensitize the hypothalamic pituitary axis to the positive feedback effects of 17β-oestradiol. Daily exposure to 17β-oestradiol did not suppress pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. It was concluded that circulating concentrations of progesterone, similar to those seen during the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle in intact ewes, may prevent all necessary components of the LH surge secretory mechanism from responding to 17β-oestradiol.     

Naloxone evokes large-amplitude GnRH pulses in luteal-phase ewes

Ewes were sampled during the mid-late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. Hypophysial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected at 5-10 min intervals for a minimum of 3 h, before i.v. infusions of saline (12 ml/h; N = 6) or naloxone (40 mg/h; N = 6) for 2 h. During the 2-h saline infusion 2/6 sheep exhibited a GnRH/LH pulse; 3/6 saline infused ewes did not show a pulse during the 6-8-h portal blood sampling period. In contrast, large amplitude GnRH/LH pulses were observed during naloxone treatment in 5/6 ewes. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) amplitude of the LH secretory episodes during the naloxone infusion (1.07 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that before the infusion in the same sheep (0.54 +/- 0.15 ng/ml). Naloxone significantly (P less than 0.005) increased the mean GnRH pulse amplitude in the 5/6 responding ewes from a pre-infusion value of 0.99 +/- 0.22 pg/min to 4.39 +/- 1.10 pg/min during infusion. This episodic GnRH secretory rate during naloxone treatment was also significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than in the saline-infused sheep (1.53 +/- 0.28 pg/min). Plasma FSH and prolactin concentrations did not change in response to the opiate antagonist. Perturbation of the endogenous opioid peptide system in the ewe by naloxone therefore increases the secretion of hypothalamic GnRH into the hypophysial portal vasculature. The response is characterized by a large-amplitude GnRH pulse which, in turn, causes a large-amplitude pulse of LH to be released by the pituitary gland.     

Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo.

The present experiment was designed to determine if and how exogenous ACTH replicates the effects of stressors to delay the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Twenty-four hours after oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin in the breeding season, groups of 8-9 intact ewes were injected with 50 microg oestradiol benzoate (0 h) followed 8 h later by 3 injections of saline or GnRH (500 ng each, i.v.) at 2 h intervals (controls). Two further groups received an additional 'late' injection of ACTH (0.8 mg i.m.) 7.5 h after oestradiol, i.e., 0.5 h before the first saline or GnRH challenge. To examine if the duration of prior exposure to ACTH was important, another group of ewes was given ACTH 'early', i.e. 2.5 h before the first GnRH injection. The first GnRH injection produced a maximum LH response of 1.9+/-0.4 ng/ml which was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced after the second and third GnRH challenge (7.1+/-1.5 ng/ml and 7.0+/-1.7 ng/ml, respectively; 'self-priming'). Late ACTH did not affect the LH response after the first GnRH challenge (1.9+/-0.4 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 ng/ml; p > 0.05) but decreased maximum LH concentrations after the second GnRH to 35% (7.1+/-1.5 vs. 4.6+/-1.1 ng/ml; p = 0.07) and to 40% after the third GnRH (7.0+/-1.7 vs. 4.0+/-0.8 ng/ml; p = 0.05). When ACTH was given early, 4.5 h before the second GnRH, there was no effect on this LH response suggesting that the effect decreases with time after ACTH administration. Concerning the oestradiol-induced LH surge, exogenous GnRH alone delayed the onset time (20.5+/-2.0 vs. 27.8+/-2.1 h; p > 0.05) and reduced the duration of the surge (8.5+/-0.9 vs. 6.7+/-0.6 h; p > 0.05). The onset of the LH surge was observed within 40 h after oestradiol on 29 out of 34 occasions in the saline +/- GnRH treated ewes compared to 11 out of 34 occasions (p < 0.05) when ACTH was also given, either late or early. In those ewes that did not have an LH surge by the end of sampling, plasma progesterone concentrations during the following oestrous cycle increased 2 days later suggesting a delay, not a complete blockade of the LH surge. In conclusion, we have revealed for the first time that ACTH reduces the GnRH self-priming effect in vivo and delays the LH surge, at least partially by direct effects at the pituitary gland.     

Expression of the GnRH and GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) genes in the hypothalamus and of the GnRH-R gene in the anterior pituitary gland of anestrous and luteal phase ewes

Data exists showing that seasonal changes in the innervations of GnRH cells in the hypothalamus and functions of some neural systems affecting GnRH neurons are associated with GnRH release in ewes. Consequently, we put the question as to how the expression of GnRH gene and GnRH-R gene in the hypothalamus and GnRH-R gene in the anterior pituitary gland is reflected with LH secretion in anestrous and luteal phase ewes. Analysis of GnRH gene expression by RT-PCR in anestrous ewes indicated comparable levels of GnRH mRNA in the preoptic area, anterior and ventromedial hypothalamus. GnRH-R mRNA at different concentrations was found throughout the preoptic area, anterior and ventromedial hypothalamus, stalk/median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland. The highest GnRH-R mRNA levels were detected in the stalk/median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland.During the luteal phase of the estrous cycle in ewes, the levels of GnRH mRNA and GnRH-R mRNA in all structures were significantly higher than in anestrous ewes. Also LH concentrations in blood plasma of luteal phase ewes were significantly higher than those of anestrous ewes.In conclusion, results from this study suggest that low expression of the GnRH and GnRH-R genes in the hypothalamus and of the GnRH-R gene in the anterior pituitary gland, amongst others, may be responsible for a decrease in LH secretion and the anovulatory state in ewes during the long photoperiod.     

Gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomized ewes: effect of passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and infusion of a GnRH agonist and estradiol

Gonadotropin secretion was examined in ovariectomized sheep after passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Infusion of ovine anti-GnRH serum, but not control antiserum, rapidly depressed serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH). The anti-GnRH-induced reduction in serum LH was reversed by circhoral (hourly) administration of a GnRH agonist that did not cross-react with the anti-GnRH serum. In contrast, passive immunization against GnRH led to only a modest reduction in serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Pulsatile delivery of the GnRH agonist did not influence serum concentrations of FSH. Continuous infusion of estradiol inhibited and then stimulated gonadotropin secretion in animals passively immunized against GnRH, with gonadotrope function driven by GnRH agonist. However, the magnitude of the positive feedback response was only 10% of the response noted in controls. These data indicate that the estradiol-induced surge of LH secretion in ovariectomized sheep is the product of estrogenic action at both hypothalamic and pituitary loci. Replacement of the endogenous GnRH pulse generator with an exogenous generator of GnRH-like pulses that were invariant in frequency and amplitude could not fully reestablish the preovulatory-like surge of LH induced by estradiol.     

Differential regulation of gonadotropin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in ewes

Changes in the frequency of GnRH and LH pulses have been shown to occur between the luteal and preovulatory periods in the ovine estrous cycle. We examined the effect of these different frequencies of GnRH pulses on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH subunit mRNAs. Eighteen ovariectomized ewes were implanted with progesterone to eliminate endogenous GnRH release during the nonbreeding season. These animals then received 3 ng/kg body weight GnRH in frequencies of once every 4, 1, or 0.5 h for 4 days. These frequencies represent those observed during the luteal and follicular phases, and the preovulatory LH and FSH surge of the ovine estrous cycle, respectively. On day 4, the ewes were killed and their anterior pituitary glands were removed for measurements of pituitary LH, FSH, and their subunit mRNAs. Pituitary content of LH and FSH, as assessed by RIA, did not change (P greater than 0.10) in response to the three different GnRH pulse frequencies. However, subunit mRNA concentrations, assessed by solution hybridization assays and expressed as femtomoles per mg total RNA, did change as a result of different GnRH frequencies. alpha mRNA concentrations were higher (P less than 0.05) when the GnRH pulse frequency was 1/0.5 h and 1 h, whereas LH beta and FSH beta mRNA concentrations were maximal (P less than 0.05) only at a pulse frequency of 1/h. Additionally, pituitary LH and FSH secretory response to GnRH on day 4 was maximal (P = 0.05) when the pulse infusion was 1/h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Differential modulation of gonadotropin secretion by selective estrogen receptor 1 and estrogen receptor 2 agonists in ovariectomized ewes

The objectives of this study were to determine whether activation of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1; also known as ERalpha), or estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2; also known as ERbeta), or both are required to: 1) acutely inhibit secretion of LH, 2) induce the preovulatory-like surge of LH, and 3) inhibit secretion of FSH in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes. OVX ewes (n = 6) were administered intramuscularly 25 micrograms estradiol (E2), 12 mg propylpyrazoletriol (PPT; a subtype-selective ESR1 agonist), 21 mg diaprylpropionitrile (DPN; a subtype-selective ESR2 agonist), or PPT + DPN. Like E2, administration of PPT, DPN, or combination of the two rapidly decreased (P < 0.05) secretion of LH. Each agonist induced a gradual, prolonged rise in secretion of LH after the initial inhibition, but neither agonist alone nor the combined agonists was able to induce a "normal" preovulatory-like surge of LH similar to that induced by E2. Compared with E2-treated ewes, the beginning of the increase in secretion of LH occurred earlier (P < 0.01) in DPN-treated ewes, later (P < 0.05) in PPT-treated ewes, and at a similar interval in ewes receiving the combined agonist treatment. Like E2, PPT decreased (P < 0.05) secretion of FSH, but the duration of suppression was much longer in PPT-treated ewes. DPN did not alter secretion of FSH in this study. Modulation of the number of GnRH receptors by PPT and DPN was examined in primary cultures of ovine pituitary cells. In our hands, both PPT and DPN increased the number of GnRH receptors, but the dose of DPN required to stimulate synthesis of GnRH receptors was 10 times higher than that of PPT. We conclude that in OVX ewes: 1) ESR1 and ESR2 mediate the negative feedback of E2 on secretion of LH at the level of the pituitary gland, 2) ESR1 and ESR2 do not synergize or antagonize the effects of each other; however, they do interact to synchronize the beginning of the stimulatory effect of E2 on secretion of LH, 3) ESR1 and ESR2 may mediate at least partially the positive feedback of E2 on LH secretion by increasing the number of GnRH receptors, and 4) only ESR1 appears to be involved in the negative feedback of E2 on secretion of FSH.     

Effects of GABA(A) receptor modulation on the expression of GnRH gene and GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) gene in the hypothalamus and GnRH-R gene in the anterior pituitary gland of follicular-phase ewes

The effect of prolonged, intermittent infusion of GABA(A) receptor agonist (muscimol) or GABA(A) receptor antagonist (bicuculline) into the third cerebral ventricle on the expression of GnRH gene and GnRH-R gene in the hypothalamus and GnRH-R gene in the anterior pituitary gland was examined in follicular-phase ewes by real-time PCR. The activation or inhibition of GABA(A) receptors in the hypothalamus decreased or increased the expression of GnRH and GnRH-R genes and LH secretion, respectively. The present results indicate that the GABAergic system in the hypothalamus of follicular-phase ewes may suppress, via hypothalamic GABA(A) receptors, the expression of GnRH and GnRH-R genes in this structure. The decrease or increase of GnRH-R mRNA in the anterior pituitary gland and LH secretion in the muscimol- or bicuculline-treated ewes, respectively, is probably a consequence of parallel changes in the release of GnRH from the hypothalamus activating GnRH-R gene expression. It is suggested that GABA acting through the GABA(A) receptor mechanism on the expression of GnRH gene and GnRH-R gene in the hypothalamus may be involved in two processes: the biosynthesis of GnRH and the release of this neurohormone in the hypothalamus.     

Progesterone does not affect the amount of mRNA for gonadotropins in the anterior pituitary gland of ovariectomized ewes

To evaluate the effect of progesterone on the synthesis and secretion of gonadotropins, ovariectomized ewes either were treated with progesterone (n = 5) for 3 wk or served as controls (n = 5) during the anestrous season. After treatment for 3 wk, blood samples were collected from progesterone-treated and ovariectomized ewes. After collection of blood samples, hypothalamic and hypophyseal tissues were collected from all ewes. Half of each pituitary was used to determine the content of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and the number of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). The amounts of mRNA for LH beta subunit, FSH beta subunit, alpha subunit, growth hormone, and prolactin were measured in the other half of each pituitary. Treatment with progesterone reduced mean serum concentrations of LH (p less than 0.001) but ot FSH (p greater than 0.05). Further, progesterone decreased (p less than 0.05) the total number of pulses of LH. We were unable to detect pulsatile release of FSH. Hypothalamic content of GnRH, number of receptors for GnRH, pituitary content of gonadotropins and mRNA for LH beta subunit, FSH beta subunit, alpha subunit, growth hormone, and prolactin were not affected (p greater than 0.05) by treatment with progesterone. Thus, after treatment with progesterone, serum concentrations of LH (but not FSH) are decreased. This effect, however, is not due to a decrease in the steady-state amount of mRNA for LH beta or alpha subunits.     

Evidence for a direct negative effect of estradiol at the level of the pituitary gland in sheep

The purpose of this experiment was to determine if pituitary stores of LH could be replenished by administration of GnRH when circulating concentrations of both progesterone and estradiol-17 beta (estradiol) were present at levels observed during late gestation. Ten ovariectomized (OVX) ewes were administered estradiol and progesterone via Silastic implants for 69 days. One group of 5 steroid-treated OVX ewes was given GnRH for an additional 42 days (250 ng once every 4 h). Steroid treatment alone reduced (p less than 0.01) the amount of LH in the anterior pituitary gland by 77%. Pulsatile administration of GnRH to steroid-treated ewes resulted in a further decrease (p less than 0.01) in pituitary content of LH. Compared to the OVX ewes, concentrations of mRNAs for alpha- and LH beta-subunits were depressed (p less than 0.01) in all steroid-treated ewes, whether or not they received GnRH. The ability of the dosage of GnRH used to induce release of LH was examined by collecting blood samples for analysis of LH at 15 days and 42 days after GnRH treatment was initiated. Two of 5 and 3 of 5 steroid-treated ewes that received pulses of GnRH responded with increased serum concentrations of LH after GnRH administration during the first and second bleedings, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Progesterone directly inhibits pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion in an estradiol-dependent manner.

We recently demonstrated that progesterone and estradiol inhibit pituitary LH secretion in a synergistic fashion. This study examines the direct feedback of progesterone on the estradiol-primed pituitary. Nine ovariectomized (OVX) ewes underwent hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD) and were infused with 400 ng GnRH every 2 h throughout the experiment. After 7 days of infusion, estradiol was implanted s.c. Four days later, estradiol implants were exchanged for blank implants in 4 ewes and for progesterone implants in 5 ewes. These implants remained in place for another 4 days. Blood samples were collected around exogenous GnRH pulses before and 0.5 to 96 h after implant insertion and exchange. Serum LH and progesterone concentrations were determined through RIA. One month later, 4 of the HPD-OVX ewes previously implanted with steroids were reinfused with GnRH and the implantation protocol was repeated using blank implants only. In estradiol-primed ewes, progesterone significantly lowered LH secretion after 12 h of implantation and LH secretion remained inhibited while progesterone implants were in place (p less than 0.05). Removing estradiol transiently lowered LH secretion, and this effect was significant only 24 h after estradiol withdrawal (p less than 0.05). These data suggest that progesterone has a direct, estradiol-dependent inhibitory effect on pituitary LH release and that estradiol may sustain pituitary gonadotrope response to GnRH.     

Does prolactin influence the hypothalamo-pituitary GnRH-LH system in preovulatory-phase ewes?

The effects of prolonged infusions of prolactin (PRL) into the third ventricle of the brain of cycling ewes on the secretory activity of hypothalamic GnRH neurons and pituitary LH cells in the pars distalis during the proestrous day were studied. Mature Blackhead ewes were infused with vehicle (control, n=5) or with prolactin (200 mug/day, n=5) during 4 consecutive days prior to the next spontaneous ovulation. The dose of PRL was infused each day in 4 series of 50 mug/100 mul/h at 30-min. intervals, from 8.30 to 14.00 h. The animals were slaughtered on the 16th (proestrous) day of the estrous cycle immediately after the last infusion and their brains were fixed in situ. Plasma samples were collected for 6 h at 10 min. intervals, on days 12 (before the infusions) and 16 of the cycle. The distribution pattern, number and morphology of GnRH neurons in vehicle- and PRL-infused ewes were found to be similar and typical for the proestrous phase of the cycle. The immunoreactive (ir) GnRH stores in the median eminence were high and similar in both groups. There were no differences between control and PRL-treated ewes in the number or features of irLH cells. The area fraction and optical density for irLH cells and mRNA LHbeta-expressing cells did not differ between control and experimental groups. Irrespective of the kind of infusion, changes in LH secretion during the estrous cycle were similar in control and PRL-infused ewes. Mean plasma LH concentrations were higher (p<0.001) on day 16 compared to day 12 of the cycle. There were no differences in plasma LH concentrations or in the parameters of pulsatile LH secretion between groups. In conclusion, repeated, several-hour-long infusions of PRL into the CNS prior to the next spontaneous ovulation in ewes has no direct effect on the secretory activity of GnRH neurons, and/or the synthesis, accumulation, or tonic release of LH from the pituitary gonadotrophs.     

A phase plane graph based model of the ovulatory cycle lacking the "positive feedback" phenomenon

ABSTRACT: When hormones during the ovulatory cycle are shown in phase plane graphs, reported FSH and estrogen values form a specific pattern that resembles the leaning "&" symbol, while LH and progesterone (Pg) values form a "boomerang" shape. Graphs in this paper were made using data reported by Stricker et al. [Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:883-887]. These patterns were used to construct a simplistic model of the ovulatory cycle without the conventional "positive feedback" phenomenon. The model is based on few well-established relations: - hypothalamic GnRH secretion is increased under estrogen exposure during two weeks that start before the ovulatory surge and lasts till lutheolysis. - the pituitary GnRH receptors are so prone to downregulation through ligand binding that this must be important for their function. - in several estrogen target tissue progesterone receptor (PgR) expression depends on previous estrogen binding to functional estrogen receptors (ER), while Pg binding to the expressed PgRs reduces both ER and PgR expression. Some key features of the presented model are here listed: - High GnRH secretion induced by the recovered estrogen exposure starts in the late follicular phase and lasts till lutheolysis. The LH and FSH surges start due to combination of accumulated pituitary GnRH receptors and increased GnRH secretion. The surges quickly end due to partial downregulation of the pituitary GnRH receptors (64% reduction of the follicular phase pituitary GnRH receptors is needed to explain the reported LH drop after the surge). A strong increase in the lutheal Pg blood level, despite modest decline in LH levels, is explained as delayed expression of pituitary PgRs. Postponed pituitary PgRs expression enforces a negative feedback loop between Pg levels and LH secretions not before the mid lutheal phase. - Lutheolysis is explained as a consequence of Pg binding to hypothalamic and pituitary PgRs that reduces local ER expression. When hypothalamic sensitivity to estrogen is diminished due to lack of local ERs, hypothalamus switches back to the low GnRH secretion rate, leading to low secretion of gonadotropins and to lutheolysis. During low GnRH secretion rates, previously downregulated pituitary GnRH receptors recover to normal levels and thus allow the next cycle.     

Differences in gonadotrophin concentrations and pituitary responsiveness to GnRH between Booroola ewes which were homozygous (FF), heterozygous (F+) and non-carriers (++) of a major gene influencing their ovulation rate

The mean plasma concentrations of FSH and LH were significantly higher in FF ewes than in ++ ewes with those F+ animals being consistently in between. These gene-specific differences were found during anoestrus, the luteal phase and during a cloprostenol-induced follicular phase, suggesting that the ovaries of ewes with the F-gene are more often exposed to elevated concentrations of FSH and LH than are the ovaries of ewes without the gene. The gene-specific differences in LH secretion arose because the mean LH amplitudes were 2-3 times greater in FF compared to ++ ewes with the LH amplitudes for F+ ewes being in between. The LH pulse frequencies were similar. In these studies the pulsatile nature of FSH secretion was not defined. The pituitary contents of LH during the luteal phase, were similar in all genotypes whereas for FSH they were significantly higher in the F-gene carriers compared to ++ ewes. The pituitary sensitivity to exogenous GnRH (0.1, 0.5 and 25 micrograms i.v.) was related to genotype. Overall the LH responses to GnRH were lower in FF ewes than in ++ ewes with the results for the F+ ewes being in between. The FSH responses to all GnRH doses in the FF genotype were minimal (i.e. less than 2-fold). In the other genotypes a greater than 2-fold response was noted only at the highest GnRH dose (i.e. 25 micrograms). Treatment of FF and F+ but not ++ ewes with GnRH eventually led to a reduced FSH output, suggesting that the pituitary responses to endogenous GnRH were being down-regulated in the F-gene carriers whereas this was not the case in the non-carriers. Collectively these data confirm that peripheral plasma and the pituitary together with the ovary are compartments in which F-gene differences can be observed. In conclusion, these findings raise the possibility that F-gene-specific differences may also extend to the hypothalamus and/or other regions of the brain.     

No evidence for pituitary priming to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in relation to luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion prior to the preovulatory LH surge in ewes

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of and the regulatory mechanisms involved in priming of the pituitary to GnRH before the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Experiment 1: Forty-two ewes had progestagen devices removed after 14 days and were assigned to luteal (Lut) or follicular (Foll) groups. Fifteen days later, blood sampling was initiated either immediately or 36 h after induced luteolysis in groups Lut and Foll, respectively. After 4 h, ewes were administered either saline (n = 5) or 250 ng (n = 8) or 10 microg (n = 8) of GnRH. Five ewes per treatment group were killed 1 h later, while remaining animals were blood sampled for a further 7 h. Experiment 2: Eighteen ewes were allocated to Lut and Foll groups (described above). Blood samples were collected from 2 h before GnRH (10 microg) treatment until 7 h after. Despite up-regulated GnRH-R mRNA levels in Foll ewes, pituitary content and plasma levels of LH and LHbeta mRNA levels were similar between groups. Mean FSHbeta mRNA and plasma FSH levels were elevated in Lut ewes but declined after GnRH treatment. Inversely, plasma estradiol and inhibin-A concentrations were higher in Foll ewes and declined after GnRH treatment. Fewer LH(+ve)/secretogranin II(-ve) (SgII(-ve)) granules were present in gonadotropes of Foll ewes, coincident with increased basal LH levels. Fewer smaller sized granules were present after GnRH treatment. In conclusion, there was no evidence of self-priming before onset of the preovulatory LH surge. Constitutive release of LH(+ve)/SgII(-ve) granules may maintain basal LH levels while smaller sized, presumably mature granules may be preferentially released after GnRH stimulation.     

Role of estradiol in inducing an ovulatory-like surge of luteinizing hormone in sheep

Two experiments were performed to examine the effect of estradiol on secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and on the number of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after down regulation of GnRH receptors in ovariectomized ewes. In the first experiment, ovariectomized ewes were administered one of four treatments: Group 1) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 40 h; Group 2) injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m.; Group 3) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 16 h followed immediately by an injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m.; and Group 4) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 40 h plus injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m. after the 16th h of infusion. Ewes in Groups 1, 3 and 4 responded to the infusion of GnRH with an immediate increase in serum concentrations of LH, with maximum values occurring between 2 and 4 h after the start of infusion; serum concentrations of LH then began to decline and were approaching the pretreatment baseline within 16 h. Administration of estradiol resulted in a surge of LH regardless of whether the pituitary had been desensitized by infusion of GnRH or not. In all cases the magnitude of the surge was similar to that induced by the initial infusion of GnRH. In Groups 2 and 3 the surge of LH began at 12.3 +/- 0.1 and 11.9 +/- 0.1 h after administration of estradiol. In contrast, the ewes in Group 4 had a surge of LH beginning 3.7 +/- 0.1 h after administration of estradiol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neuroendocrine control of FSH secretion: IV. Hypothalamic control of pituitary FSH-regulatory proteins and their relationship to changes in FSH synthesis and secretion

The current dogma is that the differential regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) synthesis and secretion is modulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency and by changes in inhibins, activins, and follistatins both at the pituitary and at the peripheral level. To date no studies have looked at the overlapping function of these regulators in a combined setting. We tested the hypothesis that changes in GnRH pulse frequency alter the relative abundance of these regulators at the pituitary and peripheral levels in a manner consistent with changes in pituitary and circulating concentrations of FSH; that is, an increase in FSH will be accompanied by increased stimulatory input (activin) and/or reduced follistatin and inhibin. Ovariectomized ewes were subjected to a combination hypothalamic pituitary disconnection (HPD)-hypophyseal portal blood collection procedure. Hypophyseal portal and jugular blood samples were collected for a 6-h period from non-HPD ewes, HPD ewes, or HPD ewes administered GnRH hourly or every 3 h for 4 days. In the absence of endogenous hypothalamic and ovarian hormones that regulate gonadotropin secretion, 3-hourly pulses of GnRH increased pituitary content of FSH more than hourly GnRH, although these differences were not evident in the peripheral circulation. The results failed to support the hypothesis in that the preferential increase of pituitary content of FSH by the lower GnRH pulse frequency could be explained by changes in the pituitary content of inhibin A, follistatin, or activin B. Perhaps the effects of GnRH pulse frequency on FSH is due to changes in the balance of free versus bound amounts of these FSH regulatory proteins or to the involvement of other regulators not monitored in this study.