The predictive value of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing

Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes predisposing to breast and ovarian cancers, is available to women with a relevant family history. The aim of this study was to estimate the positive and negative predictive value of clinical sequence analysis of these genes. A reference graph showing positive and negative predictive values over a range of pre-test risk was derived, taking into account the sensitivity and specificity of a full-sequence analysis test. High positive and negative predictive values were found for women with pre-test risk between 4% and 40%, a range of risk commonly seen in clinical testing. The predictive value of full sequence and single-site analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2, therefore, compares favorably with other diagnostic medical tests. Our results provide a numerical estimate of the predictive value of BRCA testing, and as such, provide a valuable tool to healthcare providers and families as they interpret BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results.     

The founder mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM genes in Moroccan Jewish women with breast cancer

To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the inherited predisposition to breast cancer in non-Ashkenazi Jews, we genotyped 54 Jewish Moroccan women with breast cancer, unselected for family history of cancer, for the predominant Jewish mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM. One patient (2%) was found to have the 185de1AG BRCA1 mutation, none was a carrier of the 6174delT BRCA2 mutation, and 2/54 (4%) were heterozygous for the ATM mutation. These rates were not significantly different from the rates in the general non-Ashkenazi population. These preliminary data may indicate that the predominant Jewish mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM genes contribute little, if any, to breast cancer predisposition and risk among Moroccan Jews.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast cancer

The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have established roles in genome integrity maintenance and in the control of homologous recombination. Recent work has produced valuable insights into the mechanisms of action of the gene products. This review summarizes some of these advances, and attempts to place them in the context of known functions of the genes.     

The BRCA1 RING and BRCT domains cooperate in targeting BRCA1 to ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci

BRCA1 accumulates in nuclear foci during S-phase and reassembles into DNA repair-associated foci after DNA damage, reflecting its role in genome maintenance. BRCA1 comprises a RING domain at the N terminus and a BRCT domain at the C terminus, through which it associates with DNA repair proteins. The key sequences that target BRCA1 to DNA damage-induced foci have not been identified. Here, we mapped the BRCA1 foci-targeting domains of yellow fluorescence protein (YFP)-tagged BRCA1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). Cancer mutations specific to the BRCT domain, but not the RING domain, abolished BRCA1 recruitment to IR-induced foci. The YFP-BRCT domain itself, however, localized poorly at IR-induced foci, and the RING domain and other sequences were negative. We discovered that only when the RING and BRCT domains were combined was foci targeting restored to levels observed for wild-type BRCA1. The RING-BRCT fusion co-localized at foci with the MDC1 DNA damage response factor and inhibited entry of endogenous BRCA1 into nuclear foci. Our results explain why exon 11-deficient BRCA1 splice variants are targeted to IR-induced foci even though they are incapable of repairing DNA damage. We propose that both RING and BRCT domains together target BRCA1 to large focal assemblies at DNA double-stranded breaks.     

BRCA1和BRCA2与DNA损伤修复及转录调控

乳腺癌和卵巢癌敏感基因BRCA1和BRCA2与同源重组,DNA损伤修复,胚胎生长,转录调控及遍在蛋白化有关,其中,BRCA1和BRCA2在DNA损伤修复和转录调控中功能的确定,将有助于探讨和阐明两者的肿瘤抑制功能及其机理,作者将综述近年来有关BRCA1和BRCA2在DNA损伤修复和转录调控中功能研究的最新进展。     

New complexities for BRCA1 and BRCA2

A large number of diverse functions have been attributed to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes. Here we review recent progress in the field.     

Telomere Length Shows No Association with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Status

This study aimed to determine whether telomere length (TL) is a marker of cancer risk or genetic status amongst two cohorts of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and controls. The first group was a prospective set of 665 male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls (mean age 53 years), all healthy at time of enrolment and blood donation, 21 of whom have developed prostate cancer whilst on study. The second group consisted of 283 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls (mean age 48 years), half of whom had been diagnosed with breast cancer prior to enrolment. TL was quantified by qPCR from DNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes. Weighted and unweighted Cox regressions and linear regression analyses were used to assess whether TL was associated with BRCA1/2 mutation status or cancer risk. We found no evidence for association between developing cancer or being a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier and telomere length. It is the first study investigating TL in a cohort of genetically predisposed males and although TL and BRCA status was previously studied in females our results don''t support the previous finding of association between hereditary breast cancer and shorter TL.     

The prevalence of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi Jews

Three founder mutations in the cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 occur frequently enough among Ashkenazi Jews to warrant consideration of genetic testing outside the setting of high-risk families with multiple cases of breast or ovarian cancer. We estimated the prevalence of these founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the general population of Ashkenazi Jews according to age at testing, personal cancer history, and family cancer history. We compared the results of anonymous genetic testing of blood samples obtained in a survey of >5,000 Jewish participants from the Washington, DC, area with personal and family cancer histories obtained from questionnaires completed by the participants. In all subgroups defined by age and cancer history, fewer mutations were found in this community sample than in clinical series studied to date. For example, 11 (10%) of 109 Jewish women who had been given a diagnosis of breast cancer in their forties carried one of the mutations. The most important predictor of mutation status was a previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. In men and in women never given a diagnosis of cancer, family history of breast cancer before age 50 years was the strongest predictor. As interest in genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Jewish community broadens, community-based estimates such as these help guide those seeking and those offering such testing. Even with accurate estimates of the likelihood of carrying a mutation and the likelihood of developing cancer if a mutation is detected, the most vexing clinical problems remain.     

BRCA1基因与乳腺癌

乳腺癌易感基因1(BRCA1)是具有遗传倾向的乳腺癌和卵巢癌的易感基因,且是一种抑癌基因.BRCA1基因的突变与家族性乳腺癌及它在细胞周期的调节,DNA损伤修复,基因的转录调控和诱导细胞凋亡方面起着重要作用.BRCA1基因的突变与家族性乳腺癌及卵巢癌的发生密切相关,对BRCA1分子功能的研究,将有利于阐明肿瘤发生的机理关.BRCA1的启动子甲基化与散发性乳腺癌有关.本文拟对BRCA1的结构,功能以及它的甲基化,突变,杂合性丢失对乳腺癌的影响作一综述.     

Characterization of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Many missense variants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes responsible for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, are of unclear clinical significance. Characterizing the significance of such variants is important for medical management of patients in whom they are identified. The aim of this study was to characterize eight of the most common reported missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 occurring in patients tested for hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancers. The prevalence of each variant in a control population, co-segregation of the variant with cancer within families, location of the variant within the gene, the nature of the amino acid substitution and conservation of the wild-type amino acid among species were considered. In a control population, the BRCA1 variants M1652I, R1347G, and S1512I, were each observed at a frequency of 4.08%, 2.04%, and 2.04%, respectively, and the BRCA2 variants A2951T, V2728I, and D1420Y, were seen at 1.02%, 0.68%, and 0.34%, respectively. Although the BRCA2 variants T598A and R2034C were not seen in this group of controls, other clinical and published observations indicate that these variants are not deleterious. Based on epidemiological and biological criteria, we therefore conclude that the BRCA1 missense mutations R1347G, S1512I and M1652I, and the BRCA2 missense mutations T598A, D1420Y, R2034C, V2728I, and A2951T, are not deleterious mutations.