Biogenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pheromone a-Factor,from Yeast Mating to Human Disease

Summary: The mating pheromone a-factor secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a farnesylated and carboxylmethylated peptide and is unusually hydrophobic compared to other extracellular signaling molecules. Mature a-factor is derived from a precursor with a C-terminal CAAX motif that directs a series of posttranslational reactions, including prenylation, endoproteolysis, and carboxylmethylation. Historically, a-factor has served as a valuable model for the discovery and functional analysis of CAAX-processing enzymes. In this review, we discuss the three modules comprising the a-factor biogenesis pathway: (i) the C-terminal CAAX-processing steps carried out by Ram1/Ram2, Ste24 or Rce1, and Ste14; (ii) two sequential N-terminal cleavage steps, mediated by Ste24 and Axl1; and (iii) export by a nonclassical mechanism, mediated by the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter Ste6. The small size and hydrophobicity of a-factor present both challenges and advantages for biochemical analysis, as discussed here. The enzymes involved in a-factor biogenesis are conserved from yeasts to mammals. Notably, studies of the zinc metalloprotease Ste24 in S. cerevisiae led to the discovery of its mammalian homolog ZMPSTE24, which cleaves the prenylated C-terminal tail of the nuclear scaffold protein lamin A. Mutations that alter ZMPSTE24 processing of lamin A in humans cause the premature-aging disease progeria and related progeroid disorders. Intriguingly, recent evidence suggests that the entire a-factor pathway, including all three biogenesis modules, may be used to produce a prenylated, secreted signaling molecule involved in germ cell migration in Drosophila. Thus, additional prenylated signaling molecules resembling a-factor, with as-yet-unknown roles in metazoan biology, may await discovery.     

Pheromones and Pheromone Receptors Are the Primary Determinants of Mating Specificity in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two haploid cell types, a and alpha, each of which produces a unique set of proteins that participate in the mating process. We sought to determine the minimum set of proteins that must be expressed to allow mating and to confer specificity. We show that the capacity to synthesize alpha-factor pheromone and a-factor receptor is sufficient to allow mating by mat alpha 1 mutants, mutants that normally do not express any alpha- or a-specific products. Likewise, the capacity to synthesize a-factor receptor and alpha-factor pheromone is sufficient to allow a ste2 ste6 mutants, which do not produce the normal a cell pheromone and receptor, to mate with wild-type a cells. Thus, the a-factor receptor and alpha-factor pheromone constitute the minimum set of alpha-specific proteins that must be produced to allow mating as an alpha cell. Further evidence that the pheromones and pheromone receptors are important determinants of mating specificity comes from studies with mat alpha 2 mutants, cells that simultaneously express both pheromones and both receptors. We created a series of strains that express different combinations of pheromones and receptors in a mat alpha 2 background. These constructions reveal that mat alpha 2 mutants can be made to mate as either a cells or as alpha cells by causing them to express only the pheromone and receptor set appropriate for a particular cell type. Moreover, these studies show that the inability of mat alpha 2 mutants to respond to either pheromone is a consequence of two phenomena: adaptation to an autocrine response to the pheromones they secrete and interference with response to alpha factor by the a-factor receptor.     

Biogenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mating Pheromone a-Factor

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone a-factor is a prenylated and carboxyl methylated extracellular peptide signaling molecule. Biogenesis of the a-factor precursor proceeds via a distinctive multistep pathway that involves COOH-terminal modification, NH₂-terminal proteolysis, and a nonclassical export mechanism. In this study, we examine the formation and fate of a-factor biosynthetic intermediates to more precisely define the events that occur during a-factor biogenesis. We have identified four distinct a-factor biosynthetic intermediates (P0, P1, P2, and M) by metabolic labeling, immunoprecipitation, and SDSPAGE. We determined the biochemical composition of each by defining their NH₂-terminal amino acid and COOH-terminal modification status. Unexpectedly, we discovered that not one, but two NH₂-terminal cleavage steps occur during the biogenesis of a-factor. In addition, we have shown that COOH-terminal prenylation is required for the NH₂-terminal processing of a-factor and that all the prenylated a-factor intermediates (P1, P2, and M) are membrane bound, suggesting that many steps of a-factor biogenesis occur in association with membranes. We also observed that although the biogenesis of a-factor is a rapid process, it is inherently inefficient, perhaps reflecting the potential for regulation. Previous studies have identified gene products that participate in the COOH-terminal modification (Ram1p, Ram2p, Ste14p), NH₂-terminal processing (Ste24p, Axl1p), and export (Ste6p) of a-factor. The intermediates defined in the present study are discussed in the context of these biogenesis components to formulate an overall model for the pathway of a-factor biogenesis.In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the peptide mating pheromones a-factor and α-factor function to promote conjugation between cells of the opposite mating type, MATa and MATα (Marsh et al., 1991; Sprague and Thorner, 1992). Like the peptide hormones secreted by higher eukaryotes, the yeast mating pheromones are initially synthesized as larger precursors that undergo posttranslational modification and proteolytic processing before their export from the cell. Despite their functional equivalence as signaling molecules, the a-factor and α-factor pheromones are structurally quite dissimilar and exemplify distinct paradigms for biogenesis. The maturation of α-factor is well characterized and involves the “classical” secretory pathway (ER→ Golgi→ secretory vesicles; Julius et al., 1984). Subsequent to its translocation across the ER membrane, the α-factor precursor undergoes signal sequence cleavage, glycosylation, a series of proteolytic processing steps in the lumenal compartments of the secretory pathway, and then exits the cell via exocytosis (Fuller et al., 1986; Sprague and Thorner, 1992). In contrast to our extensive understanding of α-factor maturation, our view of the events involved in a-factor biogenesis is still incomplete. An important difference between the two pheromones is that secretion of a-factor is mediated by a “nonclassical” export mechanism (Kuchler et al., 1989; McGrath and Varshavsky, 1989; Michaelis, 1993). The purpose of the present study is to delineate the steps of a-factor biogenesis that occur before its export, by the identification and characterization of a-factor biosynthetic intermediates.Mature bioactive a-factor is a prenylated and methylated dodecapeptide, derived by the posttranslational maturation of a precursor encoded by the similar and functionally redundant genes MFA1 and MFA2 (Brake et al., 1985; Michaelis and Herskowitz, 1988). The structures of the precursor and mature forms of a-factor derived from MFA1 are shown in Fig. ​Fig.1.1. The a-factor precursor can be subdivided into three functional segments: (a) the mature portion (shaded in Fig. ​Fig.1),1), which is ultimately secreted; (b) the NH₂-terminal extension; and (c) the COOH-terminal CAAX motif (C is cysteine, A is aliphatic, and X is one of many residues). As shown here, and also suggested by our previous studies, the biogenesis of a-factor occurs by an ordered series of events involving first COOH-terminal CAAX modification, then NH₂-terminal processing, and finally export from the cell (He et al., 1991; Michaelis, 1993; Sapperstein et al., 1994). Open in a separate windowFigure 1Structure of precursor and mature forms of a-factor encoded by MFA1. The a-factor precursor encoded by MFA1 is shown with the NH₂-terminal extension, COOH-terminal CAAX motif, and mature portion (shaded gray) indicated. Every fifth residue is numbered. Mature a-factor derived from this precursor is modified on its COOH-terminal cysteine residue by a farnesyl moiety and a carboxyl methyl group, as indicated.The COOH-terminal maturation of the a-factor precursor is directed by its CAAX sequence. The CAAX motif is present at the COOH terminus of numerous eukaryotic proteins, most notably the Ras proteins, and is known to signal a triplet of posttranslational modifications. These include prenylation of the cysteine residue, proteolysis of the COOH terminal AAX residues (VIA for a-factor), and methylation of the newly exposed cysteine carboxyl group (Clarke, 1992; Zhang and Casey, 1996). The yeast enzymes that mediate the modification of CAAX-terminating proteins are known from genetic and biochemical studies. RAM1 and RAM2 encode the subunits of the cytosolic farnesyltransferase enzyme (Fujiyama et al., 1987; He et al., 1991; Powers et al., 1986; Schafer et al., 1990). An “AAX” endoprotease has been detected as a membrane-associated activity in yeast extracts, although the corresponding gene(s) remains elusive (Ashby et al., 1992; Hrycyna and Clarke, 1992). STE14 encodes the prenylcysteine-dependent carboxyl methyltransferase that mediates methylation, the final step in modification of CAAX proteins; Ste14p is also membrane associated (Hrycyna and Clarke, 1990; Hrycyna et al., 1991; Marr et al., 1990; Sapperstein et al., 1994). In mutants (ram1, ram2, and ste14) defective in CAAX modification, biologically active a-factor is not produced.The events involved in the NH₂-terminal proteolytic processing of the a-factor precursor are less well-defined than those of COOH-terminal maturation. It was recently shown that a protease encoded by the AXL1 gene is required for one step of the NH₂-terminal processing of a-factor (Adames et al., 1995). Axl1p belongs to the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE)¹ subfamily of proteases; an AXL1 homologue, Ste23p, was also found to perform a role at least partially redundant to that of Axl1p in a-factor processing (Adames et al., 1995). Recently, we have identified another gene, STE24, whose product participates in the NH₂-terminal processing of the a-factor precursor in a manner distinct from Axl1p and Ste23p (Fujimura-Kamada and Michaelis, 1997). Based on a priori inspection of the precursor and mature forms of a-factor (Fig. ​(Fig.1),1), a single NH₂-terminal proteolytic cleavage event (between residues N21 and Y22) might have been predicted; however, we provide evidence in the present study that the proteolytic processing of the NH₂terminal extension of the a-factor precursor occurs in two distinct steps.The final event in a-factor biogenesis is the export of the fully matured pheromone from the cell. The absence of a canonical NH₂-terminal signal sequence in the MFA1 and MFA2 sequences, as well as the lack of effect upon a-factor secretion of sec mutants blocked at various steps in the classical secretory pathway, led to the suggestion of a nonclassical export mechanism for a-factor export (McGrath and Varshavsky, 1989; Sterne, 1989). Indeed, a-factor export is now known to be mediated by Ste6p, a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily of proteins (Kuchler et al., 1989; McGrath and Varshavsky, 1989). ABC proteins carry out the ATP-dependent membrane translocation of a variety of compounds, including small peptides, hydrophobic drugs, and even prenylcysteine derivatives, by an uncharacterized mechanism (Gottesman and Pastan, 1993; Zhang et al., 1994). It is notable that a-factor undergoes COOH-terminal modification and NH₂-terminal proteolytic maturation before Ste6p-mediated membrane translocation. This order of events contrasts with those of the biogenesis of the α-factor precursor and other classical secretory substrates, which undergo ER membrane translocation first and are matured only subsequently.In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the events that occur during a-factor biogenesis, before its export from the cell. Our approach was to identify a-factor biosynthetic intermediates, determine their chemical composition and localization properties, and examine the efficiency of their formation and the effects of an a-factor CAAX mutation on their formation. In addition to identifying the biosynthetic intermediates we expected, which include the unmodified a-factor precursor (P0), the COOHterminally modified a-factor precursor (P1), and mature a-factor (M), we unexpectedly uncovered a novel and unanticipated intermediate. This species, designated P2, is fully COOH-terminally modified and has had only a segment of its NH₂-terminal extension proteolytically removed. The existence of the P2 intermediate provides evidence that an additional unpredicted step occurs during the NH₂-terminal processing of the a-factor precursor. The biosynthetic intermediates we identify here, considered together with known a-factor biogenesis components, are presented in terms of a comprehensive model for the a-factor biogenesis pathway.     

Isolation and Chemical Characterization of a Mating Pheromone Produced by Saccharomyces kluyveri

The pullulanase gene (pul) of Klebsiella aerogenes was transferred in vivo to Escherichia coli by using RP4:: Mu cts. The pul gene was expressed in E. coli, although the level of pullulanase activity in E. coli was lower than that in K. aerogenes, and the Pul⁺ transconjugants were relatively unstable in an unselective medium. Production of pullulanase, which is used to make maltose from starch, was induced in E. coli by pullulan, waxy maize amylopectin, soluble starch and maltose. When the transconjugant cells of E. coli were grown with pullulan or maltose, most pullulanase was produced intracellularly, whereas K. aerogenes produced pullulanase extracellularly. Retransfer of the pul_k gene from E. coli to K. aerogenes by conjugation resulted in an increase of the production of extracellular pullulanase.     

Construction of Flocculent Yeast Cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) by Mating or Protoplast Fusion Using a Yeast Cell Containing the Flocculation Gene FL05

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the gene FL01 and the gene FL05 are dominant flocculation genes. In diploid cells heterozygous for MAT, however, expression of the FL01 gene was greatly diminished as far as we examined, as seen in the FL08 gene. On the other hand, expression of the FL05 gene was not affected by the mating-type locus. Several brewer’s and wine flocculent yeast cells showed the flocculence phenotype defined as the FL05 type. These results suggested the usefulness of the FL05 gene in improvement of the flocculation properties of industrial strains.     

Regulation of Mating and Meiosis in Yeast by the Mating-Type Region

A supposed sporulation-deficient mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is found to affect mating in haploids and in diploids, and to be inseparable from the mating-type locus by recombination. The mutation is regarded as a defective a allele and is designated a*. This is confirmed by its dominance relations in diploids, triploids, and tetraploids. Tetrad analysis of tetraploids and of their sporulating diploid progeny suggests the existence of an additional locus, RME, which regulates sporulation in yeast strains that can mate. Thus the recessive homozygous constitution rme/rme enables the diploids a*/α, a/a*, and α/α to go through meiosis. Haploids carrying rme show apparent premeiotic DNA replication in sporulation conditions. This new regulatory locus is linked to the centromere of the mating-type chromosome, and its two alleles, rme and RME, are found among standard laboratory strains.     

Robust Generation and Decoding of Morphogen Gradients

Morphogen gradients play a key role in multiple differentiation processes. Both the formation of the gradient and its interpretation by the receiving cells need to occur at high precision to ensure reproducible patterning. This need for quantitative precision is challenged by fluctuations in the environmental conditions and by variations in the genetic makeup of the developing embryos. We discuss mechanisms that buffer morphogen profiles against variations in gene dosage. Self-enhanced morphogen degradation and pre-steady-state decoding provide general means for buffering the morphogen profile against fluctuations in morphogen production rate. A more specific “shuttling” mechanism, which establishes a sharp and robust activation profile of a widely expressed morphogen, and enables the adjustment of morphogen profile with embryo size, is also described. Finally, we consider the transformation of the smooth gradient profile into sharp borders of gene expression in the signal-receiving cells. The integration theory and experiments are increasingly used, providing key insights into the system-level functioning of the developmental system.In order for a uniform field of cells to differentiate into a reproducible pattern of organs and tissues, cells need to receive information about their position within the field. During development, positional information is often conveyed by spatial gradients of morphogens (Wolpert 1989). In the presence of such gradients, cells are subject to different levels of morphogen, depending on their positions within the field, and activate, accordingly, one of several gene expression cassettes. The quantitative shape of the morphogen gradient is critical for patterning, with cell-fate boundaries established at specific concentration thresholds. Although these general features of morphogen-based patterning are universal, the range and form of the morphogen profile, and the pattern of induced target genes, vary significantly depending on the tissue setting and the signaling pathways used.The formation of a morphogen gradient is a dynamic process, influenced by the kinetics of morphogen production, diffusion, and degradation. These processes are tightly controlled through intricate networks of positive and negative feedback loops, which shape the gradient and enhance its reproducibility between individual embryos and developmental contexts. In the past three decades, many of the components comprising the morphogen signaling cascades have been identified and sorted into pathways, enabling one to start addressing seminal questions regarding their functionality: How is it that morphogen signaling is reproducible from one embryo to the next, despite fluctuations in the levels of signaling components, temperature differences, variations in size, or unequal distribution of components between daughter cells? Are there underlying mechanisms that assure a reproducible response? Are these mechanisms conserved across species, similar to the signaling pathways they control?In this review, we outline insights we gained by quantitatively analyzing the process of morphogen gradient formation. We focus on mechanisms that buffer morphogen profiles against fluctuations in gene dosage, and describe general means by which such buffering is enhanced. These mechanisms include self-enhanced morphogen degradation and pre-steady-state decoding. In addition, we describe a more specific “shuttling” mechanism that is used to generate a sharp and robust profile of a morphogen activity from a source that is broadly produced. We discuss the implication of the shuttling mechanism for the ability of embryos to adjust their pattern with size. Finally, we consider the transformation of the smooth gradient profile into sharp borders of gene expression in the signal-receiving cells.     

Interconversion of Yeast Mating Types III. Action of the Homothallism (HO) Gene in Cells Homozygous for the Mating Type Locus

Mating type interconversion in homothallic Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been studied in diploids homozygous for the mating type locus produced by sporulation of a/a/a/α and a/a/α/α tetraploid strains. Mating type switches have been analyzed by techniques including direct observation of cells for changes in α-factor sensitivity. Another method of following mating type switching exploits the observation that a/α cells exhibit polar budding and a/a and α/α cells exhibit medial budding.—These studies indicate the following: (1) The allele conferring the homothallic life cycle (HO) is dominant to the allele conferring the heterothallic life cycle (ho). (2) The action of the HO gene is controlled by the mating type locus—active in a/a and α/α cells but not in a/α cells. (3) The HO (or HO-controlled) gene product can act independently on two mating type alleles located on separate chromosomes in the same nucleus. (4) A switch in mating type is observed in pairs of cells, each of which has the same change.     

电穿孔法转化完整酵母的研究

本文用酿酒酵母（Ｓａｃｃｈａｒｏｍｙｃｅｓ ｃｅｒｅｖｉｓｉａｅ）作材料,探讨了电穿孔转化完整酵母的几个条件。其中电场强度及脉冲时间是两个最重要的参数。在２ｋｖ／ｃｍ,９ｍｓ时获得１０＾４转化子／ｕｇＤＮＡ的转化率。转化率还与所采用的菌株与质粒等条件有关。此技术简便迅速。     

酵母细胞的电击高频转化

用Ｂｉｏ－Ｒａｄ生产的基因脉冲仪进行酿酒酵母电击转化实验,得到的最适条件为：５ｋｖ／ｃｍ２５μＦ和２００Ω。电击后涂布前的培养时间为２小时。电击后细胞存活率为４６％时,每微克质粒ＤＮＡ得到１０６以上的转化子。用相同的质粒和受体菌进行原生质体法和醋酸锂法比较实验,转化率分别为２×１０４和３．５×１０２个转化子／μｇＤＮＡ。电击转化是最方便易行和高效率的方法。     

Polarization of Diploid Daughter Cells Directed by Spatial Cues and GTP Hydrolysis of Cdc42 in Budding Yeast

Cell polarization occurs along a single axis that is generally determined by a spatial cue. Cells of the budding yeast exhibit a characteristic pattern of budding, which depends on cell-type-specific cortical markers, reflecting a genetic programming for the site of cell polarization. The Cdc42 GTPase plays a key role in cell polarization in various cell types. Although previous studies in budding yeast suggested positive feedback loops whereby Cdc42 becomes polarized, these mechanisms do not include spatial cues, neglecting the normal patterns of budding. Here we combine live-cell imaging and mathematical modeling to understand how diploid daughter cells establish polarity preferentially at the pole distal to the previous division site. Live-cell imaging shows that daughter cells of diploids exhibit dynamic polarization of Cdc42-GTP, which localizes to the bud tip until the M phase, to the division site at cytokinesis, and then to the distal pole in the next G1 phase. The strong bias toward distal budding of daughter cells requires the distal-pole tag Bud8 and Rga1, a GTPase activating protein for Cdc42, which inhibits budding at the cytokinesis site. Unexpectedly, we also find that over 50% of daughter cells lacking Rga1 exhibit persistent Cdc42-GTP polarization at the bud tip and the distal pole, revealing an additional role of Rga1 in spatiotemporal regulation of Cdc42 and thus in the pattern of polarized growth. Mathematical modeling indeed reveals robust Cdc42-GTP clustering at the distal pole in diploid daughter cells despite random perturbation of the landmark cues. Moreover, modeling predicts different dynamics of Cdc42-GTP polarization when the landmark level and the initial level of Cdc42-GTP at the division site are perturbed by noise added in the model.     

酵母细胞破碎方法对S-腺苷-L-蛋氨酸提取的影响

考察了不同细胞破碎方法对酵母释放S-腺苷-L-蛋氨酸(SAM)的影响及雷氏盐沉淀分离SAM的影响。结果表 明,用乙酸乙酯处理细胞,再利用0.35moL·L-1硫酸破壁可以使90%以上的SAM从酵母内释放出来,该方法对其它的干扰物 质释放量少,而且能较好地保持SAM的稳定性,有利于SAM的分离和纯化;采用雷氏盐对SAM进行沉淀分离,能有效保持 SAM的稳定性,简化了工艺流程,有利于降低生产成本。     

The Shuttling Scaffold Model for Prevention of Yeast Pheromone Pathway Misactivation

The molecular scaffold in the yeast pheromone pathway, Ste5, shuttles continuously between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Ste5 undergoes oligomerization reaction in the nucleus. Upon pheromone stimulation, the Ste5 dimer is rapidly exported out of the nucleus and recruited to the plasma membrane for pathway activation. This clever device on part of the yeast cell is thought to prevent pathway misactivation at high enough levels of Ste5 in the absence of pheromone. We have built a spatiotemporal model of signaling in this pathway to describe its regulation. Our present work underscores the importance of spatial modeling of cell signaling networks to understand their control and functioning.     

Improvement of Protoplast Regeneration by Growing Yeast Cells Hypertonically

N2O was produced during the reduction of NO2- by resting cells of Lactobacillus lactis TS4. At an initial NO2- concentration of 69 micrograms/ml, the rate of N2O production was 1.97 nmol/min per mg of protein, and the recovery of reduced NO2- -N as N2O-N after 24 h was 77%. Higher initial NO2- concentrations decreased both the rate of production of N2O and the recovery of reduced NO2- -N. CO2 production increased during NO2- reduction.     

固定化酵母细胞生产1,6-二磷酸果糖研究

本文研究了固定化酵母细胞制备果糖1,6二磷酸(FDP)的方法及其生产。用卡拉胶包埋方法固定化酿酒酵母(Sacchromyces cerevisae),对含葡萄糖1.0M,磷酸盐0.8M的糖磷液,pH6.5,在37℃下进行磷酸化反应。反复分批转化20天以上,可达到平均产FDPH_427.58mg/ml,最高为59.94mg/ml。用100ml固定化细胞生物反应器连续运转309h,稀释速率D=0.097h~(-1),平均产FDPH_4 21.51mg/ml。20L反应器连续运转,生产能力达到1.7g/h.L。用层析方法制备FDPNa_3结晶粉,提取收率为72.08％,制备质量达到或超过了国内外同类产品的质量要求。     

Three-Dimensional Gradients of Cytokine Signaling between T Cells

Immune responses are regulated by diffusible mediators, the cytokines, which act at sub-nanomolar concentrations. The spatial range of cytokine communication is a crucial, yet poorly understood, functional property. Both containment of cytokine action in narrow junctions between immune cells (immunological synapses) and global signaling throughout entire lymph nodes have been proposed, but the conditions under which they might occur are not clear. Here we analyze spatially three-dimensional reaction-diffusion models for the dynamics of cytokine signaling at two successive scales: in immunological synapses and in dense multicellular environments. For realistic parameter values, we observe local spatial gradients, with the cytokine concentration around secreting cells decaying sharply across only a few cell diameters. Focusing on the well-characterized T-cell cytokine interleukin-2, we show how cytokine secretion and competitive uptake determine this signaling range. Uptake is shaped locally by the geometry of the immunological synapse. However, even for narrow synapses, which favor intrasynaptic cytokine consumption, escape fluxes into the extrasynaptic space are expected to be substantial (≥20% of secretion). Hence paracrine signaling will generally extend beyond the synapse but can be limited to cellular microenvironments through uptake by target cells or strong competitors, such as regulatory T cells. By contrast, long-range cytokine signaling requires a high density of cytokine producers or weak consumption (e.g., by sparsely distributed target cells). Thus in a physiological setting, cytokine gradients between cells, and not bulk-phase concentrations, are crucial for cell-to-cell communication, emphasizing the need for spatially resolved data on cytokine signaling.     

Global Analysis of Fission Yeast Mating Genes Reveals New Autophagy Factors

Macroautophagy (autophagy) is crucial for cell survival during starvation and plays important roles in animal development and human diseases. Molecular understanding of autophagy has mainly come from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and it remains unclear to what extent the mechanisms are the same in other organisms. Here, through screening the mating phenotype of a genome-wide deletion collection of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we obtained a comprehensive catalog of autophagy genes in this highly tractable organism, including genes encoding three heretofore unidentified core Atg proteins, Atg10, Atg14, and Atg16, and two novel factors, Ctl1 and Fsc1. We systematically examined the subcellular localization of fission yeast autophagy factors for the first time and characterized the phenotypes of their mutants, thereby uncovering both similarities and differences between the two yeasts. Unlike budding yeast, all three Atg18/WIPI proteins in fission yeast are essential for autophagy, and we found that they play different roles, with Atg18a uniquely required for the targeting of the Atg12–Atg5·Atg16 complex. Our investigation of the two novel factors revealed unforeseen autophagy mechanisms. The choline transporter-like protein Ctl1 interacts with Atg9 and is required for autophagosome formation. The fasciclin domain protein Fsc1 localizes to the vacuole membrane and is required for autophagosome-vacuole fusion but not other vacuolar fusion events. Our study sheds new light on the evolutionary diversity of the autophagy machinery and establishes the fission yeast as a useful model for dissecting the mechanisms of autophagy.