Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Nitric Oxide Production Contributes to Hydrogen-Promoted Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis

The signaling role of hydrogen gas (H₂) has attracted increasing attention from animals to plants. However, the physiological significance and molecular mechanism of H₂ in drought tolerance are still largely unexplored. In this article, we report that abscisic acid (ABA) induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) by triggering intracellular signaling events involving H₂, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), and the guard cell outward-rectifying K⁺ channel (GORK). ABA elicited a rapid and sustained H₂ release and production in Arabidopsis. Exogenous hydrogen-rich water (HRW) effectively led to an increase of intracellular H₂ production, a reduction in the stomatal aperture, and enhanced drought tolerance. Subsequent results revealed that HRW stimulated significant inductions of NO and ROS synthesis associated with stomatal closure in the wild type, which were individually abolished in the nitric reductase mutant nitrate reductase1/2 (nia1/2) or the NADPH oxidase-deficient mutant rbohF (for respiratory burst oxidase homolog). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the HRW-promoted NO generation is dependent on ROS production. The rbohF mutant had impaired NO synthesis and stomatal closure in response to HRW, while these changes were rescued by exogenous application of NO. In addition, both HRW and hydrogen peroxide failed to induce NO production or stomatal closure in the nia1/2 mutant, while HRW-promoted ROS accumulation was not impaired. In the GORK-null mutant, stomatal closure induced by ABA, HRW, NO, or hydrogen peroxide was partially suppressed. Together, these results define a main branch of H₂-regulated stomatal movement involved in the ABA signaling cascade in which RbohF-dependent ROS and nitric reductase-associated NO production, and subsequent GORK activation, were causally involved.Stomata are responsible for leaves of terrestrial plants taking in carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and likewise regulate how much water plants evaporate through the stomatal pores (Chaerle et al., 2005). When experiencing water-deficient conditions, surviving plants balance photosynthesis with controlling water loss through the stomatal pores, which relies on turgor changes by pairs of highly differentiated epidermal cells surrounding the stomatal pore, called the guard cells (Haworth et al., 2011; Loutfy et al., 2012).Besides the characterization of the significant roles of abscisic acid (ABA) in regulating stomatal movement, the key factors in guard cell signal transduction have been intensively investigated by performing forward and reverse genetics approaches. For example, both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) have been identified as vital intermediates in guard cell ABA signaling (Bright et al., 2006; Yan et al., 2007; Suzuki et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2012). The key ROS-producing enzymes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) guard cells are the respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh) D and F (Kwak et al., 2003; Bright et al., 2006; Mazars et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2012). Current available data suggest that there are at least two distinct pathways responsible for NO synthesis involved in ABA signaling in guard cells: the nitrite reductase (NR)- and l-Arg-dependent pathways (Desikan et al., 2002; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). Genetic evidence further demonstrated that removal of the major known sources of either ROS or NO significantly impairs ABA-induced stomatal closure. ABA fails to induce ROS production in the atrbohD/F double mutant (Kwak et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012) and NO synthesis in the NR-deficient mutant nitrate reductase1/2 (nia1/2; Bright et al., 2006; Neill et al., 2008), both of which lead to impaired stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Most importantly, ROS and NO, which function both synergistically and independently, have been established as ubiquitous signal transduction components to control a diverse range of physiological pathways in higher plants (Bright et al., 2006; Tossi et al., 2012).The guard cell outward-rectifying K⁺ channel (GORK) encodes the exclusive voltage-gated outwardly rectifying K⁺ channel protein, which was located in the guard cell membrane (Ache et al., 2000; Dreyer and Blatt, 2009). Expression profiles revealed that this gene is up-regulated upon the onset of drought, salinity, and cold stress and ABA exposure (Becker et al., 2003; Tran et al., 2013). Reverse genetic evidence further showed that GORK plays an important role in the control of stomatal movements and allows the plant to reduce transpirational water loss significantly (Hosy et al., 2003) and participates in the regulation of salinity tolerance by preventing salt-induced K⁺ loss (Jayakannan et al., 2013). Due to the high complexity of guard cell signaling cascades, whether and how ABA-triggered GORK up-regulation is attributed to the generation of cellular secondary messengers, such as ROS and NO, is less clear.Hydrogen gas (H₂) was recently revealed as a signaling modulator with multiple biological functions in clinical trails (Ohsawa et al., 2007; Itoh et al., 2009; Ito et al., 2012). It was previously found that a hydrogenase system could generate H₂ in bacteria and green algae (Meyer, 2007; Esquível et al., 2011). Although some earlier studies discovered the evolution of H₂ in several higher plant species (Renwick et al., 1964; Torres et al., 1984), it was also proposed that the eukaryotic hydrogenase-like protein does not metabolize H₂ (Cavazza et al., 2008; Mondy et al., 2014). Since the explosion limit of H₂ gas is about 4% to 72.4% (v/v, in the air), the direct application of H₂ gas in experiments is flammable and dangerous. Regardless of these problems to be resolved, the methodology, such as using exogenous hydrogen-rich water (HRW) or hydrogen-rich saline, which is safe, economical, and easily available, provides a valuable approach to investigate the physiological function of H₂ in animal research and clinical trials. For example, hydrogen dissolved in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium was found to react with cytotoxic ROS and thus protect against oxidative damage in PC12 cells and rats (Ohsawa et al., 2007). The neuroprotective effect of H₂-loaded eye drops on retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury was also reported (Oharazawa et al., 2010). In plants, corresponding results by using HRW combined with gas chromatography (GC) revealed that H₂ could act as a novel beneficial gaseous molecule in plant responses against salinity (Xie et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2013), cadmium stress (Cui et al., 2013), and paraquat toxicity (Jin et al., 2013). More recently, the observation that HRW could delay the postharvest ripening and senescence of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) was reported (Hu et al., 2014).Considering the fact that the signaling cascades for salt, osmotic, and drought stresses share a common cascade in an ABA-dependent pathway, it would be noteworthy to identify whether and how H₂ regulates the bioactivity of ABA-induced downstream components and, thereafter, biological responses, including stomatal closure and drought tolerance. To resolve these scientific questions, rbohD, rbohF, nia1/2, nitric oxide associated1 (noa1; Van Ree et al., 2011), nia1/2/noa1, and gork mutants were utilized to investigate the relationship among H₂, ROS, NO, and GORK in the guard cell signal transduction network. By the combination of pharmacological and biochemical analyses with this genetics-based approach, we provide comprehensive evidence to show that H₂ might be a newly identified bioeffective modulator involved in ABA signaling responsible for drought tolerance, that HRW-promoted stomatal closure was mainly attributed to the modulation of ROS-dependent NO generation, and that GORK might be the downstream target protein of H₂ signaling.     

Rapid Structural Changes and Acidification of Guard Cell Vacuoles during Stomatal Closure Require Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-Bisphosphate

Rapid stomatal closure is essential for water conservation in plants and is thus critical for survival under water deficiency. To close stomata rapidly, guard cells reduce their volume by converting a large central vacuole into a highly convoluted structure. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this change are poorly understood. In this study, we used pH-indicator dyes to demonstrate that vacuolar convolution is accompanied by acidification of the vacuole in fava bean (Vicia faba) guard cells during abscisic acid (ABA)–induced stomatal closure. Vacuolar acidification is necessary for the rapid stomatal closure induced by ABA, since a double mutant of the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase vha-a2 vha-a3 and vacuolar H⁺-PPase mutant vhp1 showed delayed stomatal closure. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the critical role of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(3,5)P₂] in changes in pH and morphology of the vacuole. Single and double Arabidopsis thaliana null mutants of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinases (PI3P5Ks) exhibited slow stomatal closure upon ABA treatment compared with the wild type. Moreover, an inhibitor of PI3P5K reduced vacuolar acidification and convolution and delayed stomatal closure in response to ABA. Taken together, these results suggest that rapid ABA-induced stomatal closure requires PtdIns(3,5)P₂, which is essential for vacuolar acidification and convolution.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.     

Role and Interrelationship of Gα Protein,Hydrogen Peroxide,and Nitric Oxide in Ultraviolet B-Induced Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis Leaves

Heterotrimeric G proteins have been shown to transmit ultraviolet B (UV-B) signals in mammalian cells, but whether they also transmit UV-B signals in plant cells is not clear. In this paper, we report that 0.5 W m⁻² UV-B induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) by eliciting a cascade of intracellular signaling events including Gα protein, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and nitric oxide (NO). UV-B triggered a significant increase in H₂O₂ or NO levels associated with stomatal closure in the wild type, but these effects were abolished in the single and double mutants of AtrbohD and AtrbohF or in the Nia1 mutants, respectively. Furthermore, we found that UV-B-mediated H₂O₂ and NO generation are regulated by GPA1, the Gα-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. UV-B-dependent H₂O₂ and NO accumulation were nullified in gpa1 knockout mutants but enhanced by overexpression of a constitutively active form of GPA1 (cGα). In addition, exogenously applied H₂O₂ or NO rescued the defect in UV-B-mediated stomatal closure in gpa1 mutants, whereas cGα AtrbohD/AtrbohF and cGα nia1 constructs exhibited a similar response to AtrbohD/AtrbohF and Nia1, respectively. Finally, we demonstrated that Gα activation of NO production depends on H₂O₂. The mutants of AtrbohD and AtrbohF had impaired NO generation in response to UV-B, but UV-B-induced H₂O₂ accumulation was not impaired in Nia1. Moreover, exogenously applied NO rescued the defect in UV-B-mediated stomatal closure in the mutants of AtrbohD and AtrbohF. These findings establish a signaling pathway leading to UV-B-induced stomatal closure that involves GPA1-dependent activation of H₂O₂ production and subsequent Nia1-dependent NO accumulation.Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of α-, β-, and γ-subunits, are a key intracellular signaling molecule in both mammalian and plant systems. Classically, upon signal reception by a receptor coupled to the heterotrimer, the Gα-subunit separates from the Gβγ dimer, and either Gα or the Gβγ dimer can act as a functional unit and induce downstream signaling (Oldham and Hamm, 2008). In contrast to mammalian cells, where multiple α, β, and γ genes exist, there is only one prototypical Gα (GPA1), one Gβ (AGB1), and two known Gγ (AGG1 and AGG2) genes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Temple and Jones, 2007). Despite the comparative simplicity of players, G proteins have been shown to participate in multiple signaling pathways in Arabidopsis, including developmental processes, phytohormone responses, and responses to biotic and abiotic environmental signals such as pathogens, ozone, drought, and light (Assmann, 2005; Temple and Jones, 2007; Warpeha et al., 2007; Okamoto et al., 2009; Nilson and Assmann, 2010).Depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer results in increased levels of the sun’s UV-B radiation (280–315 nm) at the Earth’s surface. Although this influx of shortwave photons with high energy implies serious effects for all living organisms (Frohnmeyer and Staiger, 2003), UV-B is also a key environmental signal that initiates diverse responses in a range of organisms (Jansen and Bornman, 2012). Thus, understanding the mechanism of UV-B signal transduction in cells is very important. In recent years, significant progress has been made in identifying the molecular players and understanding the early mechanisms and functions of the UV-B perception and signaling pathway in plants. The perception of UV-B by UV RESISTANCE LOCUS8 (UVR8) followed by the interaction among UVR8, CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1), and ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 (HY5) has emerged as a primary mechanism of the UV-B response that is crucial for UV-B acclimation and tolerance (Rizzini et al., 2011; Christie et al., 2012; Heijde and Ulm, 2012; Jansen and Bornman, 2012). However, few of the molecular players involved in UV-B signal transduction are currently known. In mammalian cells, heterotrimeric G proteins have been shown to mediate various UV-B-induced cellular responses, such as secretion of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, cyclooxygenase2 expression, and apoptosis in human keratinocytes (Seo et al., 2004, 2007; Seo and Juhnn, 2010), suggesting that G proteins are important molecular players in UV-B signal transduction. However, at present, whether G proteins participate in the responses of plant cells to UV-B is not known.Stomata embedded in the epidermis of terrestrial plants are important for CO₂ absorption and water transpiration and are possible points of entry for pathogens. Thus, the regulation of stomatal apertures is extremely important for the survival of plants. Phenotypic analyses of Arabidopsis mutants lacking the Gα- or Gβ-subunit show that these G proteins are involved in stomatal movement regulated by abscisic acid (ABA; Wang et al., 2001; Pandey and Assmann, 2004; Liu et al., 2007; Fan et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2011), sphingosine-1-P (Coursol et al., 2003, 2005), phosphatidic acid (PA; Mishra et al., 2006), extracellular calmodulin (ExtCaM; Chen et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009), extracellular ATP (Hao et al., 2012), and the pathogen-associated molecular pattern flg22 (Zhang et al., 2008), suggesting that plant G proteins respond to various stimuli as key regulators of stomatal movement. On exposure to UV-B radiation, many plant species exhibit decreases in stomatal conductance and/or aperture under growth chamber, greenhouse, and field conditions (Musil and Wand, 1993; Nogués et al., 1999; Jansen and Noort, 2000). However, in some species, UV-B has been reported to induce either stomatal opening or stomatal closure, perhaps depending on the metabolic state of guard cells (Jansen and Noort, 2000). Furthermore, UV-B-inhibited photosynthesis is partially caused by stomatal limitation (He et al., 2004). Thus, understanding the mechanism of stomatal movement regulated by UV-B is extremely important for improving the resistance of plants to enhanced UV-B radiation, but, to date, it is poorly understood.Recently, compelling evidence emerged that hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and nitric oxide (NO) function as signaling molecules in plants, mediating a range of responses to environmental stress including UV-B radiation (Neill et al., 2002; Qiao and Fan, 2008; Wilson et al., 2008). Increasing evidence also points to the role for H₂O₂ and NO as essential components in guard cell signaling. For example, both H₂O₂ and NO have been implicated in ABA-, salicylic acid (SA)-, ethylene-, ExtCaM-, and darkness-induced stomatal closure. Furthermore, several main cellular players in stomatal movement, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases, protein phosphatases, cytoskeleton, and ion channels, have already been identified as likely targets downstream of H₂O₂ or NO (Neill et al., 2008; Wang and Song, 2008; Huang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Wilkins et al., 2011; Yemets et al., 2011). G protein signaling to the membrane-bound H₂O₂ synthetic enzyme, NADPH oxidase, has been implicated in the development of disease resistance and the apoptotic hypersensitive response in rice (Oryza sativa; Suharsono et al., 2002). Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to the air pollutant ozone is also impaired in a mutant lacking the Gα subunit (Joo et al., 2005). The heterotrimeric G proteins also participate in ROS metabolism in plant cells (Wei et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2010). During stomatal movement, G proteins mediate H₂O₂ production induced by ABA (Zhang et al., 2011), ExtCaM (Chen et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009), and extracellular ATP (Hao et al., 2012) as well as NO production induced by ExtCaM in guard cells (Li et al., 2009). In addition, phospholipase Dα and its product PA, which interact with GPA1 during ABA inhibition of stomatal opening (Mishra et al., 2006), also promote ABA-induced ROS production (Zhang et al., 2009). These observations suggest that G proteins may be key regulators of H₂O₂ and NO production in plant cells, including guard cells. With regard to the stomatal movement regulated by UV-B radiation, our previous studies showed that H₂O₂ and NO generation are required for UV-B-induced stomatal closure (He et al., 2005, 2011a, 2011b). However, whether the UV-B-induced production of H₂O₂ and NO in guard cells is also regulated by G proteins remains unknown.In this study, we use Arabidopsis mutants (e.g. GPA1 null mutants gpa1-1 and gpa1-2; Nia1-2, Nia2-1, and Nia1-2/Nia2-5, which are defective in NO production; and AtrbohD, AtrbohF, and AtrbohD/AtrbohF, which are defective in producing H₂O₂) and pharmacological reagents to show that the G protein is involved in the regulation of UV-B-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis via sequential elucidation of H₂O₂ and NO, two key regulators of UV-B regulation of stomatal movements. Our results establish a linear signaling cascade in which the Gα protein transmits UV-B signals to elicit H₂O₂, which then elicits NO in guard cells to regulate UV-B-dependent stomatal closure.     

Aquaporins Contribute to ABA-Triggered Stomatal Closure through OST1-Mediated Phosphorylation

Stomatal movements in response to environmental stimuli critically control the plant water status. Although these movements are governed by osmotically driven changes in guard cell volume, the role of membrane water channels (aquaporins) has remained hypothetical. Assays in epidermal peels showed that knockout Arabidopsis thaliana plants lacking the Plasma membrane Intrinsic Protein 2;1 (PIP2;1) aquaporin have a defect in stomatal closure, specifically in response to abscisic acid (ABA). ABA induced a 2-fold increase in osmotic water permeability (P_f) of guard cell protoplasts and an accumulation of reactive oxygen species in guard cells, which were both abrogated in pip2;1 plants. Open stomata 1 (OST1)/Snf1-related protein kinase 2.6 (SnRK2.6), a protein kinase involved in guard cell ABA signaling, was able to phosphorylate a cytosolic PIP2;1 peptide at Ser-121. OST1 enhanced PIP2;1 water transport activity when coexpressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Upon expression in pip2;1 plants, a phosphomimetic form (Ser121Asp) but not a phosphodeficient form (Ser121Ala) of PIP2;1 constitutively enhanced the P_f of guard cell protoplasts while suppressing its ABA-dependent activation and was able to restore ABA-dependent stomatal closure in pip2;1. This work supports a model whereby ABA-triggered stomatal closure requires an increase in guard cell permeability to water and possibly hydrogen peroxide, through OST1-dependent phosphorylation of PIP2;1 at Ser-121.     

Abscisic Acid Mediates a Divergence in the Drought Response of Two Conifers

During water stress, stomatal closure occurs as water tension and levels of abscisic acid (ABA) increase in the leaf, but the interaction between these two drivers of stomatal aperture is poorly understood. We investigate the dynamics of water potential, ABA, and stomatal conductance during the imposition of water stress on two drought-tolerant conifer species with contrasting stomatal behavior. Rapid rehydration of excised shoots was used as a means of differentiating the direct influences of ABA and water potential on stomatal closure. Pinus radiata (Pinaceae) was found to exhibit ABA-driven stomatal closure during water stress, resulting in strongly isohydric regulation of water loss. By contrast, stomatal closure in Callitris rhomboidea (Cupressaceae) was initiated by elevated foliar ABA, but sustained water stress saw a marked decline in ABA levels and a shift to water potential-driven stomatal closure. The transition from ABA to water potential as the primary driver of stomatal aperture allowed C. rhomboidea to rapidly recover gas exchange after water-stressed plants were rewatered, and was associated with a strongly anisohydric regulation of water loss. These two contrasting mechanisms of stomatal regulation function in combination with xylem vulnerability to produce highly divergent strategies of water management. Species-specific ABA dynamics are proposed as a central component of drought survival and ecology.By guarding the interface between plant and atmosphere, the stomata of land plants occupy a uniquely important role that connects diverse aspects of plant biology with atmospheric processes. Capitalizing upon the potential for stomata to be used to modify plant growth and survival, or as a tool for interpreting environmental change, requires a mechanistic understanding of how these tiny valves operate. Yet, an integrated understanding of stomatal control remains elusive. Foremost in this uncertainty is an explanation for how complex signals from the environment are translated into guard cell movement. A particularly challenging feature of stomatal behavior is the fact that environmental perturbation induces both physical and chemical responses within the plant and that turgor-regulated stomata are responsive to both signals. Disentangling these distinct contributions to stomatal conductance (g_s) has been made more complicated by the limited communication between molecular-scaled disciplines of mutant characterization and membrane transport biology and researchers at the larger scale of plant water relations and xylem transport. As a result, two contrasting views of stomatal control exist. Molecular biologists view stomata as osmotically regulated valves uniquely responsive to plant hormone levels and the resultant movement of ions across the guard cell membranes (Schroeder et al., 2001; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2005). By contrast, most process-based models assume a direct influence of soil water content on stomatal aperture (Buckley, 2005; Damour et al., 2010).The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is seen as a cornerstone of stomatal function because it has been shown to trigger responses in guard cell membrane channels and transporters that cause a reduction in guard cell turgor, thereby closing stomata. ABA-mediated stomatal closure in seed plants (but not in ferns and lycophytes; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011) is broadly accepted as the explanation for stomatal closure during water stress (Zhang and Davies, 1989; Bauer et al., 2013); yet, there are very few studies that show a good correlation between the level of ABA and g_s during water stress in the field. The traditional explanation for this lack of a strong relationship suggests that ABA is a root-derived hormone that is delivered to the leaf in the transpiration stream (Zhang et al., 1987; Davies and Zhang, 1991) and hence that the xylem ABA flux, rather than the leaf level of ABA, should dictate the intensity of the stomatal response to soil drying (Tardieu et al., 1992; Tardieu and Davies, 1993). The flux-based model for ABA action in the leaf remains the most widely used interpretation of how stomata sense and respond to drying soil, despite the fact that there is mounting evidence for significant ABA synthesis in the leaf and guard cells, and short term responses to ABA that cannot be explained by xylem transport (Christmann et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2006; Georgopoulou and Milborrow, 2012). Furthermore, the ABA flux approach has never been successfully applied to explain variation in transpiration in trees (Sperry, 2000; Cochard et al., 2002), suggesting that there may be some benefit in reexamining some of the principles and assumptions used to link water stress, ABA, and transpiration.Here, we examine the dynamics of stomatal closure, leaf ABA levels, and xylem tension during the gradual imposition of water stress upon two conifer species, Pinus radiata and Callitris rhomboidea, known for having contrasting stomatal responses to desiccation. Our primary aim is to separate the interacting effects of ABA and water tension on guard cell turgor pressure and stomatal diffusive conductance and hence to reveal the relative importance of water tension and ABA levels during drought as effectors of stomatal closure. Conifers are particularly suitable for identifying different closing signals because they do not appear to produce hydropassive stomatal movements (McAdam and Brodribb, 2012). This makes them ideal for examining the direct effects of ABA and water tension without the mechanical interactions between subsidiary cells and guard cells (Franks and Farquhar, 2007) that greatly complicate the mechanics of angiosperm stomatal movements. Both conifer species examined grow naturally in low rainfall habitats, but P. radiata is strongly isohydric (meaning that stomata close in a very narrow range of leaf hydration), while C. rhomboidea is anisohydric (meaning that stomata have a relatively low sensitivity to leaf hydration).     

Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

The Evolution of Mechanisms Driving the Stomatal Response to Vapor Pressure Deficit

Stomatal responses to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) are a principal means by which vascular land plants regulate daytime transpiration. While much work has focused on characterizing and modeling this response, there remains no consensus as to the mechanism that drives it. Explanations range from passive regulation by leaf hydration to biochemical regulation by the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). We monitored ABA levels, leaf gas exchange, and water status in a diversity of vascular land plants exposed to a symmetrical, mild transition in VPD. The stomata in basal lineages of vascular plants, including gymnosperms, appeared to respond passively to changes in leaf water status induced by VPD perturbation, with minimal changes in foliar ABA levels and no hysteresis in stomatal action. In contrast, foliar ABA appeared to drive the stomatal response to VPD in our angiosperm samples. Increased foliar ABA level at high VPD in angiosperm species resulted in hysteresis in the recovery of stomatal conductance; this was most pronounced in herbaceous species. Increased levels of ABA in the leaf epidermis were found to originate from sites of synthesis in other parts of the leaf rather than from the guard cells themselves. The transition from a passive regulation to ABA regulation of the stomatal response to VPD in the earliest angiosperms is likely to have had critical implications for the ecological success of this lineage.Plants continuously regulate transpiration by controlling the aperture of the stomatal pores on the surface of the leaf. The principal atmospheric determinant of stomatal aperture is the humidity of the air, which can be expressed as the vapor pressure difference between the leaf and the atmosphere. Stomatal responses to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) have been well characterized across the diversity of vascular plant species (Darwin, 1898; Lange et al., 1971; Turner et al., 1984; Franks and Farquhar, 1999; Oren et al., 1999; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; Mott and Peak, 2013), with stomata typically closing at high VPD and opening at low VPD. This comprehensive characterization has allowed for the development of highly effective empirical and mechanistic models of leaf gas exchange that provide robust predictions of the responses of transpiration to changes in VPD (Buckley et al., 2003; Katul et al., 2009; Damour et al., 2010; Medlyn et al., 2011). Despite the success of this modeling, the mechanism for the stomatal response to VPD remains poorly understood (Damour et al., 2010). Different hypotheses range from one extreme, whereby stomata respond passively through changes in leaf water content induced by the VPD or humidity perturbation (Lange et al., 1971; Mott and Peak, 2013), to the other extreme, whereby stomata close uniquely in response to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA; Xie et al., 2006; Bauer et al., 2013).From the earliest recognition that stomata open and close by changes in guard cell turgor (Heath, 1938), there have been many attempts to link the passive changes in water status that occur during VPD or humidity transitions with stomatal responses to VPD or humidity (Lange et al., 1971; Mott and Peak, 2013). Studies have suggested that changes in atmospheric water content passively drive stomatal responses by changing bulk leaf water status, which in turn changes guard cell turgor (Oren et al., 1999), or alternatively by changing guard cell turgor directly (Mott and Peak, 2013). Models based on these entirely passive processes are highly effective in predicting steady-state stomatal conductance (g_s) in response to changes in VPD or humidity in angiosperms (Mott and Peak, 2013).While hydraulic models provide robust predictions of steady-state g_s, they are less effective at predicting the dynamic responses of stomata to short-term perturbations, particularly with respect to the wrong-way responses that typically occur as transients (Buckley, 2005), as well as feed-forward behavior (Farquhar, 1978; Bunce, 1997; Franks et al., 1997; Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998; Ocheltree et al., 2014; compare with Mott and Peak, 2013). Although some of these models provide a pathway for incorporating the effect of ABA (Buckley, 2005), a lack of knowledge of ABA dynamics or action makes it difficult to integrate the influence of this active regulator of guard cell aperture into models. The stomatal behavior of single gene mutants (most notably the ABA synthesis and signaling mutants of Arabidopsis) strongly supports a role for ABA in mediating standard stomatal responses to changes in VPD. The stomata of these mutants are known to have less pronounced responses to a reduction in relative humidity compared with wild-type plants (Xie et al., 2006). Recently, molecular work has shown that guard cells express many of the genes required to synthesize ABA (Okamoto et al., 2009; Bauer et al., 2013), with molecular proxies for ABA level also indicating that the biochemical activity of ABA in the guard cell may increase following short-term exposure of leaves to a reduction in relative humidity (Waadt et al., 2014). These findings suggest a role for ABA in regulating stomatal responses to VPD and have led some to the conclusion that ABA synthesized autonomously by the guard cells is the predominant mechanism for stomatal responses to increased VPD (Bauer et al., 2013).Although the experimental evidence from molecular studies presents an argument for the role of ABA in the responses of stomata to changes in VPD, very few studies have quantified changes in ABA level in response to VPD. It is well established that ABA levels in leaves and guard cells can increase following the imposition of turgor loss or water stress (Pierce and Raschke, 1980; Harris et al., 1988; Harris and Outlaw, 1991). However, only a few studies have reported increases in foliar ABA level in response to high VPD (Bauerle et al., 2004; Giday et al., 2013), and none have investigated whether these observed dynamic changes or differences in ABA level were functionally relevant for stomatal control. In addition, no study has quantified the levels of ABA in guard cells during a transition in VPD.Here, we investigate the relative importance of ABA for the stomatal response to VPD in whole plants, sampled from across the vascular land plant lineage. We provide, to our knowledge, the first functional assessment of changes in ABA levels driving stomatal responses to VPD as well as critically investigate the recent suggestion that stomatal responses to VPD are driven by an autonomous guard cell synthesis of ABA.     

An Optimal Frequency in Ca2+ Oscillations for Stomatal Closure Is an Emergent Property of Ion Transport in Guard Cells

Oscillations in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_i) have been proposed to encode information that controls stomatal closure. [Ca2+]_i oscillations with a period near 10 min were previously shown to be optimal for stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), but the studies offered no insight into their origins or mechanisms of encoding to validate a role in signaling. We have used a proven systems modeling platform to investigate these [Ca2+]_i oscillations and analyze their origins in guard cell homeostasis and membrane transport. The model faithfully reproduced differences in stomatal closure as a function of oscillation frequency with an optimum period near 10 min under standard conditions. Analysis showed that this optimum was one of a range of frequencies that accelerated closure, each arising from a balance of transport and the prevailing ion gradients across the plasma membrane and tonoplast. These interactions emerge from the experimentally derived kinetics encoded in the model for each of the relevant transporters, without the need of any additional signaling component. The resulting frequencies are of sufficient duration to permit substantial changes in [Ca2+]_i and, with the accompanying oscillations in voltage, drive the K⁺ and anion efflux for stomatal closure. Thus, the frequency optima arise from emergent interactions of transport across the membrane system of the guard cell. Rather than encoding information for ion flux, these oscillations are a by-product of the transport activities that determine stomatal aperture.Stomata in the leaf epidermis are the main pathway both for CO₂ entry for photosynthesis and for foliar water loss by transpiration. Guard cells surround the stomatal pore and regulate the aperture, balancing the often conflicting demands for CO₂ and water conservation. Guard cells open and close the pore by expanding and contracting through the uptake and loss, respectively, of osmotic solutes, notably of K⁺, Cl⁻, and malate²⁻ (Mal²⁻; Pandey et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2010; Lawson and Blatt, 2014). These transport processes comprise the final effectors of a regulatory network that coordinates transport across the plasma membrane and tonoplast, and maintains the homeostasis of the guard cell. A number of well-defined signals—including light, CO₂, drought and the water stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA)—act on this network, altering transport, solute content, turgor and cell volume, and ultimately stomatal aperture.Much research has focused on stomatal closure, underscoring both Ca²⁺-independent and Ca²⁺-dependent signaling. Of the latter, elevated cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_i) inactivates inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (I_K,in) to prevent K⁺ uptake and activates Cl⁻ (anion) channels (I_Cl) at the plasma membrane to depolarize the membrane and engage K⁺ efflux through outward-rectifying K⁺ channels (I_K,out; Keller et al., 1989; Blatt et al., 1990; Thiel et al., 1992; Lemtiri-Chlieh and MacRobbie, 1994). ABA, and most likely CO₂ (Kim et al., 2010), elevate [Ca2+]_i by facilitating Ca²⁺ entry at the plasma membrane to trigger Ca²⁺ release from endomembrane stores, a process often described as Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release (Grabov and Blatt, 1998, 1999). The hormone promotes Ca²⁺ influx by activating Ca²⁺ channels (I_Ca) at the plasma membrane, even in isolated membrane patches (Hamilton et al., 2000, 2001), which is linked to reactive oxygen species (Kwak et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2013). In parallel, cADP-ribose and nitric oxide promote endomembrane Ca²⁺ release and [Ca2+]_i elevation (Leckie et al., 1998; Neill et al., 2002; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Blatt et al., 2007). Best estimates indicate that endomembrane release accounts for more than 95% of the Ca²⁺ entering the cytosol to raise [Ca2+]_i (Chen et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012).One feature of stomatal response to ABA, and indeed to a range of stimuli both hormonal as well as external, is its capacity for oscillations both in membrane voltage and [Ca2+]_i. Guard cell [Ca2+]_i at rest is typically around 100 to 200 nm, as it is in virtually all living cells. In response to ABA, [Ca2+]_i can rise above 1 μm—and locally, most likely above 10 μm—often in cyclic transients of tens of seconds to several minutes’ duration in association with oscillations in voltage and stomatal closure (Gradmann et al., 1993; McAinsh et al., 1995; Webb et al., 1996; Grabov and Blatt, 1998, 1999; Staxen et al., 1999; Allen et al., 2001). In principle, cycling in voltage and [Ca2+]_i arises as closure is accelerated with a controlled release of K⁺, Cl⁻, and Mal²⁻ from the guard cell and is subject to extracellular ion concentrations (Gradmann et al., 1993; Chen et al., 2012). However, it has been proposed that these, and similar oscillations in a variety of plant cell models, serve as physiological signals in their own right (McAinsh et al., 1995; Ehrhardt et al., 1996; Taylor et al., 1996). In support of such a signaling role, experiments designed to impose [Ca2+]_i (and voltage) oscillations in guard cells have yielded an optimal frequency for closure with a period near 10 min (Allen et al., 2001). Nonetheless, the studies offer no mechanistic explanation for this optimum that could validate a causal role in signaling, and none has been forthcoming since. Here we address questions of how such optimal frequencies in [Ca2+]_i oscillation arise and their relevance for stomatal closure, using quantitative systems analysis of guard cell transport and homeostasis. Our findings indicate that oscillations in voltage and [Ca2+]_i, and their optima associated with stomatal closure, are most simply explained as emerging from the interactions between ion transporters that drive stomatal closure. Thus, we conclude that these oscillations do not control, but are a by-product of the transport that determines stomatal aperture.     

S-Nitrosylation of Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Part of Programmed Cell Death Signaling in Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 Cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is a small redox molecule that acts as a signal in different physiological and stress-related processes in plants. Recent evidence suggests that the biological activity of NO is also mediated by S-nitrosylation, a well-known redox-based posttranslational protein modification. Here, we show that during programmed cell death (PCD), induced by both heat shock (HS) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 cells, an increase in S-nitrosylating agents occurred. NO increased in both experimentally induced PCDs, although with different intensities. In H₂O₂-treated cells, the increase in NO was lower than in cells exposed to HS. However, a simultaneous increase in S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), another NO source for S-nitrosylation, occurred in H₂O₂-treated cells, while a decrease in this metabolite was evident after HS. Consistently, different levels of activity and expression of GSNO reductase, the enzyme responsible for GSNO removal, were found in cells subjected to the two different PCD-inducing stimuli: low in H₂O₂-treated cells and high in the heat-shocked ones. Irrespective of the type of S-nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosylated proteins formed upon exposure to both of the PCD-inducing stimuli. Interestingly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), a key enzyme controlling H₂O₂ levels in plants, was found to be S-nitrosylated at the onset of both PCDs. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that S-nitrosylation of cAPX was responsible for the rapid decrease in its activity. The possibility that S-nitrosylation induces cAPX ubiquitination and degradation and acts as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD is discussed.Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous and diffusible redox molecule that acts as a signaling compound in both animal and plant systems (Pacher et al., 2007; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). In plants, NO has been found to play a key role in several physiological processes, such as germination, lateral root development, flowering, senescence, stomatal closure, and growth of pollen tubes (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004; He et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2004; Carimi et al., 2005). In addition, NO has been reported to be involved in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Leitner et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2011) and in the signaling pathways leading to programmed cell death (PCD; Delledonne et al., 1998; de Pinto et al., 2006; De Michele et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Serrano et al., 2012).The cellular environment may greatly influence the chemical reactivity of NO, giving rise to different biologically active NO-derived compounds, collectively named reactive nitrogen species, which amplify and differentiate its ability to activate physiological and stress-related processes. Many of the biological properties of NO are due to its high affinity with transition metals of metalloproteins as well as its reactivity with reactive oxygen species (ROS; Hill et al., 2010). However, recent evidence suggests that protein S-nitrosylation, due to the addition of NO to reactive Cys thiols, may act as a key mechanism of NO signaling in plants (Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011). NO is also able to react with reduced glutathione (GSH), the most abundant cellular thiol, thus producing S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which also acts as an endogenous trans-nitrosylating agent. GSNO is also considered as a NO store and donor and, as it is more stable than NO, acts as a long-distance NO transporter through the floematic flux (Malik et al., 2011). S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which is an enzyme conserved from bacteria to humans, has been suggested to play a role in regulating S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and the turnover of S-nitrosylated proteins in plants (Liu et al., 2001; Rusterucci et al., 2007).A number of proteins involved in metabolism, stress responses, and redox homeostasis have been identified as potential targets for S-nitrosylation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lindermayr et al., 2005). During the hypersensitive response (HR), 16 proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated in the seedlings of the same species (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008); in Citrus species, S-nitrosylation of about 50 proteins occurred in the NO-mediated resistance to high salinity (Tanou et al., 2009).However, while the number of candidate proteins for S-nitrosylation is increasing, the functional significance of protein S-nitrosylation has been explained only in a few cases, such as for nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (Perazzolli et al., 2004), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Wawer et al., 2010), Met adenosyltransferase (Lindermayr et al., 2006), and metacaspase9 (Belenghi et al., 2007). Of particular interest are the cases in which S-nitrosylation involves enzymes controlling ROS homeostasis. For instance, it has been reported that S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin IIE regulates the antioxidant function of this enzyme and might contribute to the HR (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007). It has also been shown that in the immunity response, S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase inactivates the enzyme, thus reducing ROS production and controlling HR development (Yun et al., 2011).Recently, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to be involved in PCD of nitric oxide excess1 (noe1) rice (Oryza sativa) plants, which are mutated in the OsCATC gene coding for catalase (Lin et al., 2012). In these plants, which show PCD-like phenotypes under high-light conditions, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and thioredoxin are S-nitrosylated. This suggests that the NO-dependent regulation of these proteins is involved in plant PCD, similar to what occurs in animal apoptosis (Sumbayev, 2003; Hara et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2012). The increase in hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) after exposure to high light in noe1 plants is responsible for the production of NO required for leaf cell death induction (Lin et al., 2012). There is a strict relationship between H₂O₂ and NO in PCD activation (Delledonne et al., 2001; de Pinto et al., 2002); however, the mechanism of this interplay is largely still unknown (for review, see Zaninotto et al., 2006; Zhao, 2007; Yoshioka et al., 2011). NO can induce ROS production and vice versa, and their reciprocal modulation in terms of intensity and timing seems to be crucial in determining PCD activation and in controlling HR development (Delledonne et al., 2001; Zhao, 2007; Yun et al., 2011).In previous papers, we demonstrated that heat shock (HS) at 55°C and treatment with 50 mm H₂O₂ promote PCD in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Vacca et al., 2004; de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008). In both experimental conditions, NO production and decrease in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX) were observed as early events in the PCD pathway, and cAPX decrease has been suggested to contribute to determining the redox environment required for PCD (de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008).In this study, the production of nitrosylating agents (NO and GSNO) in the first hours of PCD induction by HS or H₂O₂ treatment in tobacco BY-2 cells and their role in PCD were studied. The possibility that S-nitrosylation could be a first step in regulating cAPX activity and turnover as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD was also investigated.     

Stomatal Blue Light Response Is Present in Early Vascular Plants

Light is a major environmental factor required for stomatal opening. Blue light (BL) induces stomatal opening in higher plants as a signal under the photosynthetic active radiation. The stomatal BL response is not present in the fern species of Polypodiopsida. The acquisition of a stomatal BL response might provide competitive advantages in both the uptake of CO₂ and prevention of water loss with the ability to rapidly open and close stomata. We surveyed the stomatal opening in response to strong red light (RL) and weak BL under the RL with gas exchange technique in a diverse selection of plant species from euphyllophytes, including spermatophytes and monilophytes, to lycophytes. We showed the presence of RL-induced stomatal opening in most of these species and found that the BL responses operated in all euphyllophytes except Polypodiopsida. We also confirmed that the stomatal opening in lycophytes, the early vascular plants, is driven by plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase and K⁺ accumulation in guard cells, which is the same mechanism operating in stomata of angiosperms. These results suggest that the early vascular plants respond to both RL and BL and actively regulate stomatal aperture. We also found three plant species that absolutely require BL for both stomatal opening and photosynthetic CO₂ fixation, including a gymnosperm, C. revoluta, and the ferns Equisetum hyemale and Psilotum nudum.Stomata regulate gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere (Zeiger, 1983; Assmann, 1993; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Acquisition of stomata was a key step in the evolution of terrestrial plants by allowing uptake of CO₂ from the atmosphere and accelerating the provision of nutrients via the transpiration stream within the plant (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013). Stomatal aperture is regulated by changes in the turgor of guard cells, which are induced by environmental factors and endogenous phytohormones. Light is a major factor in the promotion of stomatal opening, and the opening is mediated via two distinct light-regulated pathways that are known as photosynthesis- and blue light (BL)-dependent responses under photosynthetic active radiation (PAR; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Lawson et al., 2014).The photosynthesis-dependent stomatal opening is induced by a continuous high intensity of light, and the action spectrum for the stomatal opening resembles that of photosynthetic pigments in leaves (Willmer and Fricker, 1996). Both mesophyll and guard cells possess photosynthetically active chloroplasts, and their photosynthesis has been suggested to contribute to stomatal opening in leaves. The decrease in the concentration of intercellular CO₂ (Ci) caused by photosynthetic CO₂ fixation or some unidentified mediators and metabolites from mesophyll cells is supposed to elicit stomatal opening, although the exact nature of the events is unclear (Wong et al., 1979; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Roelfsema et al., 2006; Mott et al., 2008; Lawson et al., 2014).BL-dependent stomatal opening requires a strong intensity of PAR as a background: weak BL solely scarcely elicits stomatal opening, but the same intensity of BL induces the fast and large stomatal opening in the presence of strong red light (RL; Ogawa et al., 1978; Shimazaki et al., 2007). Since such stomatal opening requires BL under the RL or PAR, we call the opening reaction a BL-dependent response of stomata. BL-dependent stomatal response takes place and proceeds in natural environments because the sunlight contains both BL and RL and facilitates photosynthetic CO₂ fixation (Assmann, 1988; Takemiya et al., 2013a). In this stomatal response, BL and PAR (BL, RL, and other wavelengths of light) seem to act as a signal and an energy source, respectively.The BL-dependent stomatal opening is initiated by the absorption of BL by phototropin1 and phototropin2 (Kinoshita et al., 2001), the plant-specific BL receptors, in guard cells followed by activation of the plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase; Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999). Two newly identified proteins, protein phosphatase1 and blue light signaling1 (BLUS1), mediate the signaling between phototropins and H+-ATPase (Takemiya et al., 2006, 2013a, 2013b). The activated H+-ATPase evokes a plasma membrane hyperpolarization, which drives K⁺ uptake through the voltage-gated, inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann, 1993; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Kollist et al., 2014). The accumulation of K⁺ causes water uptake and increases turgor pressure of guard cells, and finally results in stomatal opening. The BL-dependent opening is enhanced by RL, and BL at low intensity is effective in the presence of RL (Ogawa et al., 1978; Iino et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Suetsugu et al., 2014). These stomatal responses by RL and BL are commonly observed in a number of seed plants so far examined.Fine control of stomatal aperture to various environmental factors has been characterized in many angiosperms. Although morphological and mechanical diversity of stomata is widely documented, little is known about the functional diversity (Willmer and Fricker, 1996; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). Our previous study indicated that BL-dependent stomatal response is absent in the major fern species of Polypodiopsida, including Adiantum capillus-veneris, Pteris cretica, Asplenium scolopendrium, and Nephrolepis auriculata, but the stomata of these species open by PAR including RL (Doi et al., 2006). When the epidermal peels isolated from A. capillus-veneris are treated with photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Doi and Shimazaki, 2008), the response is completely inhibited, but the responses in the seed plants of Vicia faba and Commelina communis are relatively insensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Schwartz and Zeiger, 1984). These findings suggest that there is functional diversity in light-dependent stomatal response in different lineages of land plants. In accord with this notion, the different sensitivities of stomatal response to abscisic acid and CO₂ have been reported among the plant species of angiosperm, gymnosperm, ferns, and lycophytes (Mansfield and Willmer, 1969; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011), although the exact responsiveness to abscisic acid and CO₂ is still debated (Chater et al., 2011, 2013; Ruszala et al., 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013).To address the origin and distribution of stomatal light responses, we investigated the presence of a stomatal response using a gas exchange method and various lineages of vascular plants, including euphyllophytes and lycophytes. Unexpectedly, all plant lineages except Polypodiopsida in monilophytes exhibited a stomatal response to BL in the presence of RL, suggesting that the response was present in the early evolutionary stage of vascular plants. We also report the stomatal opening in response to RL in these plant species.