New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

Induction of COX-2-PGE2 synthesis by activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway contributes to neuronal death triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia

Neuroinflammation is a striking hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have shown the contribution of glial cells such as astrocytes in TDP-43-linked ALS. However, the role of microglia in TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that depletion of TDP-43 in microglia, but not in astrocytes, strikingly upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production through the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling and initiates neurotoxicity. Moreover, we find that administration of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, greatly diminishes the neurotoxicity triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia. Taken together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized non-cell-autonomous mechanism in TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration, identifying COX-2-PGE2 as the molecular events of microglia- but not astrocyte-initiated neurotoxicity and identifying celecoxib as a novel potential therapy for TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.¹ Most cases of ALS are sporadic, but 10% are familial. Familial ALS cases are associated with mutations in genes such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP) and, most recently discovered, C9orf72. Currently, most available information obtained from ALS research is based on the study of SOD1, but new studies focusing on TARDBP and C9orf72 have come to the forefront of ALS research.^{1, 2} The discovery of the central role of the protein TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP, in ALS was a breakthrough in ALS research.^{3, 4, 5} Although pathogenic mutations of TDP-43 are genetically rare, abnormal TDP-43 function is thought to be associated with the majority of ALS cases.¹ TDP-43 was identified as a key component of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions in most ALS patients and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration,^{6, 7} Alzheimer''s disease (AD)^{8, 9} and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{10, 11} TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA binding protein, and loss-of-function of TDP-43 has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor in TDP-43-mediated pathogenesis.^{5, 12, 13, 14}Neuroinflammation, a striking and common hallmark involved in many neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, is characterized by extensive activation of glial cells including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.^{15, 16} Although numerous studies have focused on the intrinsic properties of motor neurons in ALS, a large amount of evidence showed that glial cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, could have critical roles in SOD1-mediated motor neuron degeneration and ALS progression,^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} indicating the importance of non-cell-autonomous toxicity in SOD1-mediated ALS pathogenesis.Very interestingly, a vital insight of neuroinflammation research in ALS was generated by the evidence that both the mRNA and protein levels of the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are upregulated in both transgenic mouse models and in human postmortem brain and spinal cord.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} The role of COX-2 neurotoxicity in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders has been well explored.^{30, 31, 32} One of the key downstream products of COX-2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), can directly mediate COX-2 neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo.^{33, 34, 35, 36, 37} The levels of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are controlled by multiple cell signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway,^{38, 39, 40} and they have been found to be increased in neurodegenerative diseases including AD, PD and ALS.^{25, 28, 32, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46} Importantly, COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib exhibited significant neuroprotective effects and prolonged survival or delayed disease onset in a SOD1-ALS transgenic mouse model through the downregulation of PGE2 release.²⁸Most recent studies have tried to elucidate the role of glial cells in neurotoxicity using TDP-43-ALS models, which are considered to be helpful for better understanding the disease mechanisms.^{47, 48, 49, 50, 51} Although the contribution of glial cells to TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration is now well supported, this model does not fully suggest an astrocyte-based non-cell autonomous mechanism. For example, recent studies have shown that TDP-43-mutant astrocytes do not affect the survival of motor neurons,^{50, 51} indicating a previously unrecognized non-cell autonomous TDP-43 proteinopathy that associates with cell types other than astrocytes.Given that the role of glial cell types other than astrocytes in TDP-43-mediated neuroinflammation is still not fully understood, we aim to compare the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neurotoxicity in a TDP-43 loss-of-function model. Here, we show that TDP-43 has a dominant role in promoting COX-2-PGE2 production through the MAPK/ERK pathway in primary cultured microglia, but not in primary cultured astrocytes. Our study suggests that overproduction of PGE2 in microglia is a novel molecular mechanism underlying neurotoxicity in TDP-43-linked ALS. Moreover, our data identify celecoxib as a new potential effective treatment of TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.     

Caspase-3 feedback loop enhances Bid-induced AIF/endoG and Bak activation in Bax and p53-independent manner

Chemoresistance in cancer has previously been attributed to gene mutations or deficiencies. Bax or p53 deficiency can lead to resistance to cancer drugs. We aimed to find an agent to overcome chemoresistance induced by Bax or p53 deficiency. Here, we used immunoblot, flow-cytometry analysis, gene interference, etc. to show that genistein, a major component of isoflavone that is known to have anti-tumor activities in a variety of models, induces Bax/p53-independent cell death in HCT116 Bax knockout (KO), HCT116 p53 KO, DU145 Bax KO, or DU145 p53 KO cells that express wild-type (WT) Bak. Bak knockdown (KD) only partially attenuated genistein-induced apoptosis. Further results indicated that the release of AIF and endoG also contributes to genistein-induced cell death, which is independent of Bak activation. Conversely, AIF and endoG knockdown had little effect on Bak activation. Knockdown of either AIF or endoG alone could not efficiently inhibit apoptosis in cells treated with genistein, whereas an AIF, endoG, and Bak triple knockdown almost completely attenuated apoptosis. Next, we found that the Akt-Bid pathway mediates Bak-induced caspase-dependent and AIF- and endoG-induced caspase-independent cell death. Moreover, downstream caspase-3 could enhance the release of AIF and endoG as well as Bak activation via a positive feedback loop. Taken together, our data elaborate the detailed mechanisms of genistein in Bax/p53-independent apoptosis and indicate that caspase-3-enhanced Bid activation initiates the cell death pathway. Our results also suggest that genistein may be an effective agent for overcoming chemoresistance in cancers with dysfunctional Bax and p53.Mammalian cell death proceeds through a highly regulated program called apoptosis that is highly dependent on the mitochondria.¹ Mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) multiple apoptotic stresses permeabilize the MOM, resulting in the release of apoptogenic factors including cytochrome c, Smac, AIF, and endoG.^{2, 3, 4} Released cytochrome c activates Apaf-1, which assists in caspase activation. Then, activated caspases cleave cellular proteins and contribute to the morphological and biochemical changes associated with apoptosis. Bcl-2 family proteins control a crucial apoptosis checkpoint in the mitochondria.^{2, 5, 6, 7} Multidomain proapoptotic Bax and Bak are essential effectors responsible for the permeabilization of the MOM, whereas anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1 preserve mitochondrial integrity and prevent cytochrome c efflux triggered by apoptotic stimuli. The third Bcl-2 subfamily of proteins, BH3-only molecules (BH3s), promotes apoptosis by either activating Bax/Bak or inactivating Bcl-2/Bcl-xL/Mcl-1.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12} Upon apoptosis, the ‘activator'' BH3s, including truncated Bid (tBid), Bim, and Puma, activate Bax and Bak to mediate cytochrome c efflux, leading to caspase activation.^{8, 11, 12} Conversely, antiapoptotic Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1 sequester activator BH3s into inert complexes, which prevents Bax/Bak activation.^{8, 9} Although it has been proposed that Bax and Bak activation occurs by default as long as all of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins are neutralized by BH3s,¹³ liposome studies clearly recapitulate the direct activation model in which tBid or BH3 domain peptides derived from Bid or Bim induce Bax or Bak oligomerization and membrane permeabilization.^{12, 14, 15}Numerous studies have demonstrated a critical role for Bax in determining tumor cell sensitivity to drug induction and in tumor development. Bax has been reported to be mutated in colon^{16, 17} and prostate cancers,^{18, 19} contributing to tumor cell survival and promoting clonal expansion. Bax has been shown to restrain tumorigenesis²⁰ and is necessary for tBid-induced cancer cell apoptosis.²¹ Loss of Bax has been reported to promote tumor development in animal models.²² Bax knockout (KO) renders HCT116 cells resistant to a series of apoptosis inducers.^{23, 24, 25} p53 has been reported to be a tumor suppressor,²⁶ and its mutant can cause chemoresistance in cancer cells.^{27, 28, 29} Moreover, p53 is often inactivated in solid tumors via deletions or point mutations.^{30, 31} Thus, it is necessary to find an efficient approach or agent to overcome chemoresistance caused by Bax and/or p53 mutants.Few studies have focused on the role of Bak in tumor cell apoptosis and cancer development. Bak mutations have only been shown in gastric and colon cancer cells.³² Some studies have revealed that Bak is a determinant of cancer cell apoptosis.^{33, 34} Some studies have even demonstrated that Bak renders Bax KO cells sensitive to drug induction.^{33, 35} In this study, we are the first group to show that tBid induces Bak activation and the release of AIF and endoG in colon cancer cells, which causes cellular apoptosis independent of Bax/p53. We also found that caspase-3 is activated in apoptosis. Interestingly, downstream caspase-3 can strengthen Bak activation and the release of AIF and endoG during apoptosis via a feedback loop. Furthermore, we reveal that Akt upregulates apoptosis progression. These results will help us to better understand the function of mitochondrial apoptotic protein members in apoptosis and cancer therapies. Furthermore, our experiments may provide a theoretical basis for overcoming chemoresistance in cancer cells.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling ameliorates cerebral cell damage and regulates the neurogenesis of neural stem cells at high glucose concentrations: an in vivo and in vitro study

In the central nervous system (CNS), hyperglycemia leads to neuronal damage and cognitive decline. Recent research has focused on revealing alterations in the brain in hyperglycemia and finding therapeutic solutions for alleviating the hyperglycemia-induced cognitive dysfunction. Adiponectin is a protein hormone with a major regulatory role in diabetes and obesity; however, its role in the CNS has not been studied yet. Although the presence of adiponectin receptors has been reported in the CNS, adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the CNS has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated adiponectin receptor (AdipoR)-mediated signaling in vivo using a high-fat diet and in vitro using neural stem cells (NSCs). We showed that AdipoR1 protects cell damage and synaptic dysfunction in the mouse brain in hyperglycemia. At high glucose concentrations in vitro, AdipoR1 regulated the survival of NSCs through the p53/p21 pathway and the proliferation- and differentiation-related factors of NSCs via tailless (TLX). Hence, we suggest that further investigations are necessary to understand the cerebral AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemic conditions, because the modulation of AdipoR1 might alleviate hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.Adiponectin secreted by the adipose tissue^{1, 2} exists in either a full-length or globular form.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Adiponectin can cross the blood–brain barrier, and various forms of adiponectin are found in the cerebrospinal fluid.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Adiponectin exerts its effect by binding to the adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) and adiponectin receptor 2 (AdipoR2)^{12, 13} that have different affinities for the various circulating adiponectins.^{12, 14, 15, 16, 17} Several studies reported that both receptor subtypes are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS).^{7, 12, 18} As adiponectin modulates insulin sensitivity and inflammation,¹⁹ its deficiency induces insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in animals fed a high-fat diet (HFD).^{19, 20, 21} In addition, adiponectin can ameliorate the glucose homeostasis and increase insulin sensitivity.^{22, 23, 24} Adiponectin, which is the most well-known adipokine, acts mainly as an anti-inflammatory regulator,^{25, 26} and is associated with the onset of neurological disorders.²⁷ In addition, a recent study reported that adiponectin promotes the proliferation of hippocampal neural stem cells (NSCs).²⁸ Considering that adiponectin acts by binding to the adiponectin receptors, investigation of the adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the brain is crucial to understand the cerebral effects of adiponectin and the underlying cellular mechanisms.The prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) and Alzheimer''s disease increases with aging.²⁹ According to a cross-sectional study, in people with DM2, the risk of dementia is 2.5 times higher than that in the normal population.^{30, 31} A study performed between 1980 and 2002 suggested that an elevated blood glucose level is associated with a greater risk for dementia in elderly patients with DM2.³² In addition, according to a 9-year-long longitudinal cohort study, the risk of developing Alzheimer''s disease was 65% higher in people with diabetes than in control subjects.³³ A community-based cohort study also reported that higher plasma glucose concentrations are associated with an increased risk for dementia, because the higher glucose level has detrimental effects on the brain.³¹ High blood glucose level causes mitochondria-dependent apoptosis,^{34, 35, 36} and aggravates diverse neurological functions.^{37, 38} Inflammation and oxidative stress, which are commonly observed in people with diabetes, inhibit neurogenesis.^{39, 40, 41} Similarly, neurogenesis is decreased in mice and rats with genetically induced type I diabetes.^{42, 43} In addition, diabetic rodents have a decreased proliferation rate of neural progenitors.^{43, 44} Furthermore, several studies suggested that an HFD leads to neuroinflammation, the impairment of synaptic plasticity, and cognitive decline.^{45, 46}Here, we investigated whether AdipoR1-mediated signaling is associated with cell death in the brain of mice on a HFD, and whether high glucose level modifies the proliferation and differentiation capacity of NSCs in vitro. Our study provides novel findings about the role of AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.     

Cell cycle-dependent Cdc25C phosphatase determines cell survival by regulating apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1

Cdc25C (cell division cycle 25C) phosphatase triggers entry into mitosis in the cell cycle by dephosphorylating cyclin B-Cdk1. Cdc25C exhibits basal phosphatase activity during interphase and then becomes activated at the G₂/M transition after hyperphosphorylation on multiple sites and dissociation from 14-3-3. Although the role of Cdc25C in mitosis has been extensively studied, its function in interphase remains elusive. Here, we show that during interphase Cdc25C suppresses apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a member of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase kinase family that mediates apoptosis. Cdc25C phosphatase dephosphorylates phospho-Thr-838 in the activation loop of ASK1 in vitro and in interphase cells. In addition, knockdown of Cdc25C increases the activity of ASK1 and ASK1 downstream targets in interphase cells, and overexpression of Cdc25C inhibits ASK1-mediated apoptosis, suggesting that Cdc25C binds to and negatively regulates ASK1. Furthermore, we showed that ASK1 kinase activity correlated with Cdc25C activation during mitotic arrest and enhanced ASK1 activity in the presence of activated Cdc25C resulted from the weak association between ASK1 and Cdc25C. In cells synchronized in mitosis following nocodazole treatment, phosphorylation of Thr-838 in the activation loop of ASK1 increased. Compared with hypophosphorylated Cdc25C, which exhibited basal phosphatase activity in interphase, hyperphosphorylated Cdc25C exhibited enhanced phosphatase activity during mitotic arrest, but had significantly reduced affinity to ASK1, suggesting that enhanced ASK1 activity in mitosis was due to reduced binding of hyperphosphorylated Cdc25C to ASK1. These findings suggest that Cdc25C negatively regulates proapoptotic ASK1 in a cell cycle-dependent manner and may play a role in G₂/M checkpoint-mediated apoptosis.Cell division cycle 25 (Cdc25) phosphatases are dual-specificity phosphatases involved in cell cycle regulation. By removing inhibitory phosphate groups from phospho-Thr and phospho-Tyr residues of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs),¹ Cdc25 proteins regulate cell cycle progression in S phase and mitosis. In mammals, three isoforms of Cdc25 phosphatases have been reported: Cdc25A, which controls the G₁/S transition;^{2, 3} Cdc25B, which is a mitotic starter;⁴ and Cdc25C, which controls the G₂/M phase.⁵ Overexpression of Cdc25 phosphatases is frequently associated with various cancers.⁶ Upon exposure to DNA-damaging reagents like UV radiation or free oxygen radicals, Cdc25 phosphatases are key targets of the checkpoint machinery, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The 14-3-3 proteins bind to phosphorylated Ser-216 of Cdc25C and induce Cdc25C export from the nucleus during interphase in response to DNA damage,^{7, 8} but they have no apparent effect on Cdc25C phosphatase activity.^{9, 10} In addition, hyperphosphorylation of Cdc25C correlates to its enhanced phosphatase activity.¹¹ Most studies with Cdc25C have focused on its role in mitotic progression. However, the role of Cdc25C is not clear when it is sequestered in the cytoplasm by binding to 14-3-3.Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), also known as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 (MAPKKK5), is a ubiquitously expressed enzyme with a molecular weight of 170 kDa. The kinase activity of ASK1 is stimulated by various cellular stresses, such as H₂O₂,^{12, 13} tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α),¹⁴ Fas ligand,¹⁵ serum withdrawal,¹³ and ER stress.¹⁶ Stimulated ASK1 phosphorylates and activates downstream MAP kinase kinases (MKKs) involved in c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 pathways.^{17, 18, 19} Phosphorylation and activation of ASK1 can induce apoptosis, differentiation, or other cellular responses, depending on the cell type. ASK1 is regulated either positively or negatively depending on its binding proteins.^{12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25}ASK1 is regulated by phosphorylation at several Ser/Thr/Tyr residues. Phosphorylation at Thr-838 leads to activation of ASK1, whereas phosphorylation at Ser-83, Ser-967, or Ser-1034 inactivates ASK1.^{24, 26, 27, 28} ASK1 is basally phosphorylated at Ser-967 by an unidentified kinase, and 14-3-3 binds to this site to inhibit ASK1.²⁴ Phosphorylation at Ser-83 is known to be catalyzed by Akt or PIM1.^{27, 29} Oligomerization-dependent autophosphorylation at Thr-838, which is located in the activation loop of the kinase domain, is essential for ASK1 activation.^{14, 18, 30} Phosphorylation at Tyr-718 by JAK2 induces ASK1 degradation.³¹ Several phosphatases that dephosphorylate some of these sites have been identified. Serine/threonine protein phosphatase type 5 (PP5) and PP2C dephosphorylate phosphorylated (p)-Thr-838,^{28, 32} whereas PP2A and SHP2 dephosphorylate p-Ser-967 and p-Tyr-718, respectively.^{31, 33} Little is known about the kinase or phosphatase that regulates phosphorylation at Ser-1034. Although ASK1 phosphorylation is known to be involved in the regulation of apoptosis, only a few reports show that ASK1 phosphorylation or activity is dependent on the cell cycle.^{21, 34}In this study, we examined the functional relationship between Cdc25C and ASK1 and identified a novel function of Cdc25C phosphatase that can dephosphorylate and inhibit ASK1 in interphase but not in mitosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Cdc25C phosphorylation status plays a critical role in the interaction with and the activity of ASK1. These results reveal a novel regulatory function of Cdc25C in the ASK1-mediated apoptosis signaling pathway.     

Cancer cell death induced by novel small molecules degrading the TACC3 protein via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway

The selective degradation of target proteins with small molecules is a novel approach to the treatment of various diseases, including cancer. We have developed a protein knockdown system with a series of hybrid small compounds that induce the selective degradation of target proteins via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. In this study, we designed and synthesized novel small molecules called SNIPER(TACC3)s, which target the spindle regulatory protein transforming acidic coiled-coil-3 (TACC3). SNIPER(TACC3)s induce poly-ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation of TACC3 and reduce the TACC3 protein level in cells. Mechanistic analysis indicated that the ubiquitin ligase APC/C^CDH1 mediates the SNIPER(TACC3)-induced degradation of TACC3. Intriguingly, SNIPER(TACC3) selectively induced cell death in cancer cells expressing a larger amount of TACC3 protein than normal cells. These results suggest that protein knockdown of TACC3 by SNIPER(TACC3) is a potential strategy for treating cancers overexpressing the TACC3 protein.Inhibitors of microtubule polymerization or depolymerization such as Vinca alkaloids and taxanes, respectively, are widely used as anti-cancer drugs. They arrest cancer cells, inducing mitotic catastrophe and cancer cell death. However, these drugs also affect microtubule function in non-dividing cells and have serious side effects, such as peripheral neuropathy, which limit their utility.¹ Recently, inhibitors of spindle-regulatory proteins, such as mitotic kinases (Aurora kinases and Polo-like kinases) and a motor protein (Eg5/Ksp) have attracted considerable attention, but they have not been developed clinical use yet.^{2, 3}Transforming acidic coiled-coil-3 (TACC3) is another spindle-regulatory protein.^{4, 5} During mitosis, TACC3 localizes to the mitotic spindle and has a critical role in spindle assembly, chromosomal function and mitotic progression.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Studies using microarray and immunohistochemical analysis showed that TACC3 is overexpressed in many human cancers, including ovarian cancer, breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoma.^{12, 13, 14} Depletion of TACC3 results in chromosome alignment defects, multi-polar spindle formation, mitotic cell death and/or a postmitotic cell cycle arrest.^{15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} Additionally, conditional disruption of TACC3 has been shown to regress thymic lymphomas in p53-deficient mice without inducing any overt abnormalities in normal tissues.²¹ These findings suggest that TACC3 is a molecular target for anti-cancer drug discovery.The development of a strategy for the selective degradation may be a useful approach to the discovery of novel drugs. Based on the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), we have devised a protein knockdown system for inducing the selective degradation of target proteins by using specifically designed hybrid small compounds.^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} These compounds, which we have termed SNIPER (Specific and Non-genetic IAP-dependent Protein ERaser), are composed of two different ligands connected by a linker; one is a ligand for cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1) and the other a ligand for the target protein. Accordingly, SNIPER is expected to crosslink the ubiquitin–ligase cIAP1 and the target protein in the cells, thereby inducing ubiquitylation and, ultimately, proteasomal degradation of the target protein. To date, we have constructed SNIPERs that target cellular retinoic acid binding protein-II (CRABP-II) and nuclear receptors such as estrogen receptor α (ERα) for degradation.^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28} In this study, we designed and synthesized novel SNIPERs targeting TACC3, that is, SNIPER(TACC3)s, that induce proteasomal degradation of the TACC3 protein. We also show that cancer cells expressing a large amount of the TACC3 protein readily undergo cell death as the result of SNIPER(TACC3) treatment.     

Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015

Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death'' (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death'' (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.Defining life and death is more problematic than one would guess. In 1838, the work of several scientists including Matthias Jakob Schleiden, Theodor Schwann and Rudolf Carl Virchow culminated in the so-called ‘cell theory'', postulating that: (1) all living organisms are composed of one or more cells; (2) the cell is the basic unit of life; and (3) all cells arise from pre-existing, living cells.¹ Only a few decades later (in 1885), Walter Flemming described for the first time some of the morphologic features that have been largely (but often inappropriately) used to define apoptosis throughout the past four decades.^{2, 3, 4}A corollary of the cell theory is that viruses do not constitute bona fide living organisms.⁵ However, the discovery that the giant Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus can itself be infected by other viral species has casted doubts on this point.^{6, 7, 8} Thus, the features that underlie the distinction between a living and an inert entity remain a matter of debate. Along similar lines, defining the transition between an organism''s life and death is complex, even when the organism under consideration is the basic unit of life, a cell. From a conceptual standpoint, cell death can obviously be defined as the permanent degeneration of vital cellular functions. Pragmatically speaking, however, the precise boundary between a reversible alteration in homeostasis and an irreversible loss of cellular activities appears to be virtually impossible to identify. To circumvent this issue, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) previously proposed three criteria for the identification of dead cells: (1) the permanent loss of the barrier function of the plasma membrane; (2) the breakdown of cells into discrete fragments, which are commonly referred to as apoptotic bodies; or (3) the engulfment of cells by professional phagocytes or other cells endowed with phagocytic activity.^{9, 10, 11}However, the fact that a cell is engulfed by another via phagocytosis does not imply that the cell-containing phagosome fuses with a lysosome and that the phagosomal cargo is degraded by lysosomal hydrolases.^{12, 13, 14} Indeed, it has been reported that engulfed cells can be released from phagosomes as they preserve their viability, at least under some circumstances.¹⁵ Thus, the NCCD recommends here to consider as dead only cells that either exhibit irreversible plasma membrane permeabilization or have undergone complete fragmentation. A compendium of techniques that can be used to quantify these two markers of end-stage cell death in vitro and in vivo goes beyond the scope of this review and can be found in several recent articles.^{16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25}Importantly, cell death instances can be operationally classified into two broad, mutually exclusive categories: ‘accidental'' and ‘regulated''. Accidental cell death (ACD) is caused by severe insults, including physical (e.g., elevated temperatures or high pressures), chemical (e.g., potent detergents or extreme variations in pH) and mechanical (e.g., shearing) stimuli, is virtually immediate and is insensitive to pharmacologic or genetic interventions of any kind. The NCCD thinks that this reflects the structural disassembly of cells exposed to very harsh physicochemical conditions, which does not involve a specific molecular machinery. Although ACD can occur in vivo, for instance as a result of burns or traumatic injuries, it cannot be prevented or modulated and hence does not constitute a direct target for therapeutic interventions.^{23, 26, 27, 28} Nonetheless, cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical insults die while releasing elevated amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), that is, endogenous molecules with immunomodulatory (and sometimes cytotoxic) activity. Some DAMPs can indeed propagate an unwarranted cytotoxic response (directly or upon the involvement of innate immune effectors) that promotes the demise of local cells surviving the primary insult.^{16, 19, 29, 30, 31} Intercepting DAMPs or blocking DAMP-ignited signaling pathways may mediate beneficial effects in a wide array of diseases involving accidental (as well as regulated) instances of cell death.^{19, 32}At odds with its accidental counterpart, regulated cell death (RCD) involves a genetically encoded molecular machinery.^{9, 33} Thus, the course of RCD can be altered by means of pharmacologic and/or genetic interventions targeting the key components of such a machinery. Moreover, RCD often occurs in a relatively delayed manner and is initiated in the context of adaptive responses that (unsuccessfully) attempt to restore cellular homeostasis.^{34, 35, 36, 37, 38} Depending on the initiating stimulus, such responses can preferentially involve an organelle, such as the reticular unfolded protein response, or operate at a cell-wide level, such as macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy).^{39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44} Thus, while ACD is completely unpreventable, RCD can be modulated (at least to some extent, see below) not only by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals but also by improving the capacity of cells to mount adaptive responses to stress.^{45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50} Importantly, RCD occurs not only as a consequence of microenvironmental perturbations but also in the context of (post-)embryonic development, tissue homeostasis and immune responses.^{51, 52, 53, 54} Such completely physiologic instances of RCD are generally referred to as ‘programmed cell death'' (PCD) (Figure 1).^{9, 33}Open in a separate windowFigure 1Types of cell death. Cells exposed to extreme physical, chemical or mechanical stimuli succumb in a completely uncontrollable manner, reflecting the immediate loss of structural integrity. We refer to such instances of cellular demise with the term ‘accidental cell death'' (ACD). Alternatively, cell death can be initiated by a genetically encoded machinery. The course of such ‘regulated cell death'' (RCD) variants can be influenced, at least to some extent, by specific pharmacologic or genetic interventions. The term ‘programmed cell death'' (PCD) is used to indicate RCD instances that occur as part of a developmental program or to preserve physiologic adult tissue homeostasisFor the purpose of this discussion, it is useful to keep in mind the distinction that is currently made between the initiation of RCD and its execution. The term execution is generally used to indicate the ensemble of biochemical processes that truly cause the cellular demise. Conversely, initiation is commonly used to refer to the signal transduction events that activate executioner mechanisms. Thus, the activation of caspase-8 (CASP8) in the course of FAS ligand (FASL)-triggered apoptosis is widely considered as an initiator mechanism, whereas the consequent activation of caspase-3 (CASP3) is categorized as an executioner mechanism (see below).^{51, 55, 56, 57}Here, the NCCD formulates a set of recommendations to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of RCD, that is, between those that etiologically mediate its occurrence and those that change its kinetics or morphologic and biochemical manifestations.     

Activation of volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying chloride channel by ROS contributes to ER stress and cardiac contractile dysfunction: involvement of CHOP through Wnt

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress occurring in stringent conditions is critically involved in cardiomyocytes apoptosis and cardiac contractile dysfunction (CCD). However, the molecular machinery that mediates cardiac ER stress and subsequent cell death remains to be fully deciphered, which will hopefully provide novel therapeutic targets for these disorders. Here, we establish tunicamycin-induced model of cardiomyocyte ER stress, which effectively mimicks pathological stimuli to trigger CCD. Tunicamycin activates volume-sensitive outward rectifying Cl⁻ currents. Blockade of the volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying (VSOR) Cl⁻ channel by 4,4''-diisothiocya-natostilbene-2,2''-disulfonic acid (DIDS), a non-selective Cl⁻ channel blocker, and 4-(2-butyl-6,7-dichlor-2-cyclopentyl-indan-1-on-5-yl) oxybutyric acid (DCPIB), a selective VSOR Cl⁻ channel blocker, improves cardiac contractility, which correlates with suppressed ER stress through inhibiting the canonical GRP78/eIF2α/ATF4 and XBP1 pathways, and promotes survival of cardiomyocytes by inverting tunicamycin-induced decrease of Wnt through the CHOP pathway. VSOR activation of tunicamycin-treated cardiomyocytes is attributed to increased intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Our study demonstrates a pivotal role of ROS/VSOR in mediating ER stress and functional impairment of cardiomyocytes via the CHOP-Wnt pathway, and suggests the therapeutic values of VSOR Cl⁻ channel blockers against ER stress-associated cardiac anomalies.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is characterized as an organelle that participates in the folding of membrane and secretory proteins.^1,2 Efficient functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum is important for cell function and survival. Perturbations of ER homeostasis by energy deprivation and glucose,³ viral infections⁴ and accumulation of misfolded and/or unfolded proteins² interfere with ER function, leading to a state of ER stress.^{5, 6, 7} A cohort of chemicals, for example, tunicamycin and thapsigargin, also trigger ER stress.^{8, 9, 10} Thapsigargin disrupts the calcium storage of ER by blocking calcium reuptake into the ER lumen, thus by depleting calcium from the organelle.¹¹ In particular, tunicamycin is a highly specific ER stress inducer by inhibiting N-linked glycosylation of protein, representing a well-documented method to artificially elicit unfolded protein response.⁸ In response to ER stress, ER chaperones such as glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa (GRP78) and glucose-regulated protein 94 kDa (GRP94) are upregulated to facilitate the recovery of unfolded or misfolded proteins.¹² ER stress may act as a defense mechanism against external insults; however, prolonged and/or severe ER stress may ultimately trigger apoptosis.⁸ The C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) has been defined as a pivotal mediator of cell death signaling in ER stress.^{13, 14} Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that ER stress-induced cell death is an essential step in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of cardiovascular diseases such as ischemia reperfusion heart diseases,¹⁵ atherosclerosis,^{5, 16, 17, 18} myocardial infarction,¹⁹ hypertension^{20, 21} and heart failure.^{8, 22, 23} Inhibiting ER stress has great therapeutic values for cardiac anomalies. However, the precise mechanism involved in ER stress-induced cardiovascular diseases has not been well identified, which impedes the translation of our understanding of ER stress-induced cardiovascular anomalies into effective therapeutic strategies. Apoptosis induction requires persistent cell shrinkage, named apoptotic volume decrease (AVD).^{24, 25, 26, 27} It is an early prerequisite for the activation of caspases.²⁴ In various types of cells including cardiomyocytes, AVD process is accomplished by the activation of volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying (VSOR) Cl⁻ channel and is concomitant with the egress of water from the cells undergoing mitochondrion-initiated or death receptor-induced apoptosis.^{25, 28, 29, 30} Although inhibition of VSOR Cl⁻ channel by DIDS (4,4''-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2''-disulphonic acid) and DCPIB (4-(2-butyl-6,7- dichlor-2-cyclopentyl-indan-1-on-5-yl) oxybutyric acid) blocked AVD and rescued cardiomyocytes from mitochondrial and death receptor pathway-induced apoptosis,^{31, 32} it remains largely unknown concerning the role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel and how it is regulated in ER stress-induced apoptotic cardiomyocyte death.Emerging evidence indicates that Wnt signal pathways are found to be anti-apoptotic in the cardiovascular diseases,^{33, 34, 35} regulating crucial aspects of cardiovascular biology. However, up to now, its activity in ER stress-induced apoptosis and in the process of AVD in cardiomyocytes remains elusive.In the present study, we probed the role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel in ER stress-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, which intimately correlates with cardiac contractile dysfunction (CCD). We hypothesized that VSOR Cl⁻ channel controls the process of AVD occurring concomitantly with ER stress-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. To test this hypothesis, we investigated VSOR Cl⁻ currents in cardiomyocytes treated with the ER stress inducer tunicamycin. The pathophysiological role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel and the potential signaling mechanisms in the development of ER stress-induced apoptosis in CCD were also dissected.     

Thrombospondin-1 signaling through CD47 inhibits cell cycle progression and induces senescence in endothelial cells

CD47 signaling in endothelial cells has been shown to suppress angiogenesis, but little is known about the link between CD47 and endothelial senescence. Herein, we demonstrate that the thrombospondin-1 (TSP1)-CD47 signaling pathway is a major mechanism for driving endothelial cell senescence. CD47 deficiency in endothelial cells significantly improved their angiogenic function and attenuated their replicative senescence. Lack of CD47 also suppresses activation of cell cycle inhibitors and upregulates the expression of cell cycle promoters, leading to increased cell cycle progression. Furthermore, TSP1 significantly accelerates replicative senescence and associated cell cycle arrest in a CD47-dependent manner. These findings demonstrate that TSP1-CD47 signaling is an important mechanism driving endothelial cell senescence. Thus, TSP1 and CD47 provide attractive molecular targets for treatment of aging-associated cardiovascular dysfunction and diseases involving endothelial dysregulation.Endothelial cell (EC) senescence is accompanied with vascular dysfunction, including arterial stiffening and remodeling,¹ impaired angiogenesis,^{2, 3} reduced endothelial repair capability and increased incidence of cardiovascular disease.^{4, 5, 6} Cellular senescence can occur in vivo or in vitro in response to various stressors,^{7, 8, 9, 10} leading to suppression of cell proliferation. EC senescence has been reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of age-associated vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis.¹¹ Thus, further understanding the mechanisms of EC senescence may help to identify effective targets for antisenescence therapy and treatment aging-associated cardiovascular disorders.Previous studies have shown that the secreted matricellular protein thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) is as potent inhibitor of angiogenesis¹² and its antiangiogenic activity is mediated by its receptors, CD36^{13, 14} and CD47.^{15, 16} CD47 is a ubiquitously expressed transmembrane protein that serves as a ligand for signal regulatory protein-α and is a signaling receptor of TSP1. The TSP1-CD47 pathway has an important role in several fundamental cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation and atherosclerotic response.¹⁷ Ligation of CD47 by TSP1 has been shown to inhibit nitric oxide (NO)/cGMP signaling in vascular cells, leading to suppression of angiogenic responses.¹⁶ Recently, it was reported that lack of CD47 expression in ECs may enable these cells to spontaneously gain characteristics of embryonic stem cells.¹⁸ However, the potential role of CD47 in regulation of EC senescence has not been well explored. The present study was initiated to determine the role and mechanisms of TSP1-CD47 signaling pathway in regulating cell cycle progression and replicative senescence of ECs.     

Stress-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis via the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1 by JNK signaling

Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) activation in response to environmental stress or inflammatory cytokine stimuli generates the second messenger ceramide, which mediates the stress-induced apoptosis. However, the signaling pathways and activation mechanism underlying this process have yet to be elucidated. Here we show that the phosphorylation of nSMase1 (sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2, SMPD2) by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling stimulates ceramide generation and apoptosis and provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates stress- and cytokine-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. An nSMase1 was identified as a JNK substrate, and the phosphorylation site responsible for its effects on stress and cytokine induction was Ser-270. In zebrafish cells, the substitution of Ser-270 for alanine blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, whereas the substitution of Ser-270 for negatively charged glutamic acid mimicked the effect of phosphorylation. The JNK inhibitor SP600125 blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, which in turn blocked ceramide signaling and apoptosis. A variety of stress conditions, including heat shock, UV exposure, hydrogen peroxide treatment, and anti-Fas antibody stimulation, led to the phosphorylation of nSMase1, activated nSMase1, and induced ceramide generation and apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic ZE and human Jurkat T cells. In addition, the depletion of MAPK8/9 or SMPD2 by RNAi knockdown decreased ceramide generation and stress- and cytokine-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Therefore the phosphorylation of nSMase1 is a pivotal step in JNK signaling, which leads to ceramide generation and apoptosis under stress conditions and in response to cytokine stimulation. nSMase1 has a common central role in ceramide signaling during the stress and cytokine responses and apoptosis.The sphingomyelin pathway is initiated by the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to generate the second messenger ceramide.¹ Sphingomyelin hydrolysis is a major pathway for stress-induced ceramide generation. Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) is activated by a variety of environmental stress conditions, such as heat shock,^{1, 2, 3} oxidative stress (hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), oxidized lipoproteins),¹ ultraviolet (UV) radiation,¹ chemotherapeutic agents,⁴ and β-amyloid peptides.^{5, 6} Cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,^{7, 8, 9} interleukin (IL)-1β,¹⁰ Fas ligand,¹¹ and their associated proteins, also trigger the activation of nSMase.¹² Membrane-bound Mg²⁺-dependent nSMase is considered to be a strong candidate for mediating the effects of stress and inflammatory cytokines on ceramide.³Among the four vertebrate nSMases, nSMase1 (SMPD2) was the first to be cloned and is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus.¹³ Several studies have focused on the potential signaling roles of nSMase1, and some reports have suggested that nSMase1 is important for ceramide generation in response to stress.^{5, 6, 14, 15} In addition, nSMase1 is responsible for heat-induced apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic cultured (ZE) cells, and a loss-of-function study showed a reduction in ceramide generation, caspase-3 activation, and apoptosis in zebrafish embryos.¹⁶ However, nSMase1-knockout mice showed no lipid storage diseases or abnormalities in sphingomyelin metabolism.¹⁷ Therefore, the molecular mechanisms by which nSMase1 is activated have yet to be elucidated.Environmental stress and inflammatory cytokines^{1, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27} stimulate stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling, which involves the sequential activation of members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, including MAPK/ERK kinase kinase (MEKK)1/MAPK kinase (MKK)4, and/or SAPK/ERK kinase (SEK)1/MKK7, JNK, and c-jun. Both the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways coordinately mediate the induction of apoptosis.¹ However, possible crosstalk between the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways has not yet been characterized. Previously, we used SDS-PAGE to determine that nSMase1 polypeptides migrated at higher molecular masses,¹⁶ suggesting that the sphingomyelin signaling pathway might cause the production of a chemically modified phosphorylated nSMase1, which is stimulated under stressed conditions in ZE cells.¹⁶ Here, we demonstrate that JNK signaling results in the phosphorylation of Ser-270 of nSMase1, which initiates ceramide generation and apoptosis. We also provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates cytokine- and stress-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. We studied stress-induced ceramide generation in two cell types: ZE cells and human leukemia Jurkat T-lymphoid cells. Stress-induced apoptosis has been investigated in these systems previously.^{16, 28}