The DRY motif as a molecular switch of the human oxytocin receptor

The human oxytocin receptor is known to exhibit promiscuous activity by coupling to both Galpha(q) and Galpha(i) G proteins to activate distinct signaling pathways. A single-amino acid substitution within the highly conserved E/DRY motif at the cytosolic extension of helix 3 [i.e., D136(3.49)N] increased the rate of both basal and agonist-stimulated inositol phosphate (IP(3)) accumulation of the receptor. Furthermore, like for a typical constitutively active receptor, the partial agonist arginine vasopressin behaved as a full agonist for the D136(3.49)N mutant. Subsequently, both oxytocin and arginine vasopressin showed an increased potency in stimulating IP3 accumulation as compared to the wild-type receptor. Very interestingly, our experiments provide strong evidence that the D136(3.49)N mutant inhibits receptor signaling via Galpha(i)-mediated pathways while increasing the activity through the Galpha(q)-mediated pathways. Molecular simulations of the free and OT-bound forms of wild-type OTR and of the D136(3.49)N constitutively active mutant suggest that the receptor portions close to the E/DRY and NPxxY motifs are particularly susceptible to undergoing structural modification in response to activating mutations and agonist binding. Furthermore, computational modeling suggests that the OT-bound form of wild-type OTR is able to explore more states than the OT-bound form of the D136(3.49)N constitutively active mutant, consistent with its G protein promiscuity. Taken together, these observations emphasize the important role of the E/DRY motif not only in receptor activation but also in the promiscuity of G protein coupling. Knowledge of the mechanism of selective G protein coupling could aid drug discovery efforts to identify signaling specific therapies.     

Constitutive activation of the mu opioid receptor by mutation of D3.49(164), but not D3.32(147): D3.49(164) is critical for stabilization of the inactive form of the receptor and for its expression

The roles of conserved aspartates in the third transmembrane domain of the rat mu opioid receptor (RMOR) were explored with mutations of D3.32(147) and D3.49(164). D3.49(164) in the highly conserved DRY motif was mutated to 13 amino acids. Except for the D3.49(164)E mutant, each mutant displayed little or no detectable [(3)H]diprenorphine binding, and pretreatment with naloxone greatly enhanced binding. D3.49(164)H, -Q, -Y, -M, and -E mutants were further studied. D3.32(147) was substituted with A or N. All seven mutants exhibited similar binding affinities for the antagonist [(3)H]diprenorphine as the wild-type. The D3.49(164)H, -Q, -Y, and -M mutants, but not the D3.49(164)E and D3.32(147) mutants, exhibited enhanced basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding which was comparable to the maximally activated level of the wild-type and was related to expression levels. Naloxone, naltrexone, and naloxone methiodide significantly inhibited the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding of the D3.49(164) mutants, indicating inverse agonist activities. Treatment of the D3.49(164)Y mutant with pertussis toxin greatly reduced the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, demonstrating constitutive activation of Galpha(i)/Galpha(o). The D3.49(164)H, -Y, -M, and -Q mutants had higher affinities for DAMGO than the wild-type, which were not significantly lowered by GTPgammaS. Thus, mutation of D3.49(164) to H, Y, M, or Q in RMOR resulted in receptor assuming activated conformations. In contrast, the D3.49(164)E mutant displayed significantly lower basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and reduced affinity for DAMGO. Upon incubation of membranes at 37 degrees C, the constitutively active D3.49(164)Y mutant was structurally less stable, whereas the inactivated D3.49(164)E mutant was more stable, than the wild-type. Computational simulations showed that the E3.49 side chain interacted strongly with the conserved R3.50 in the DRY motif and stabilized the inactive form of the receptor. Taken together, these results indicate that D3.49 plays an important role in constraining the receptor in inactive conformations.     

Biased signaling of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor can be mediated through distinct mechanisms

Background

Seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs) can adopt different active conformations facilitating a selective activation of either G protein or β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. This represents an opportunity for development of novel therapeutics targeting selective biological effects of a given receptor. Several studies on pathway separation have been performed, many of these on the Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R). It has been shown that certain ligands or mutations facilitate internalization and/or recruitment of β-arrestins without activation of G proteins. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unresolved. For instance, it is unclear whether such selective G protein-uncoupling is caused by a lack of ability to interact with G proteins or rather by an increased ability of the receptor to recruit β-arrestins. Since uncoupling of G proteins by increased ability to recruit β-arrestins could lead to different cellular or in vivo outcomes than lack of ability to interact with G proteins, it is essential to distinguish between these two mechanisms.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We studied five AT1R mutants previously published to display pathway separation: D74N, DRY/AAY, Y292F, N298A, and Y302F (Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering: 2.50, 3.49–3.51, 7.43, 7.49, and 7.53). We find that D74N, DRY/AAY, and N298A mutants are more prone to β-arrestin recruitment than WT. In contrast, receptor mutants Y292F and Y302F showed impaired ability to recruit β-arrestin in response to Sar¹-Ile⁴-Ile⁸ (SII) Ang II, a ligand solely activating the β-arrestin pathway.

Conclusions/Significance

Our analysis reveals that the underlying conformations induced by these AT1R mutants most likely represent principally different mechanisms of uncoupling the G protein, which for some mutants may be due to their increased ability to recruit β-arrestin2. Hereby, these findings have important implications for drug discovery and 7TMR biology and illustrate the necessity of uncovering the exact molecular determinants for G protein-coupling and β-arrestin recruitment, respectively.     

Inverse Agonism of SQ 29,548 and Ramatroban on Thromboxane A2 Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) show some level of basal activity even in the absence of an agonist, a phenomenon referred to as constitutive activity. Such constitutive activity in GPCRs is known to have important pathophysiological roles in human disease. The thromboxane A2 receptor (TP) is a GPCR that promotes thrombosis in response to binding of the prostanoid, thromboxane A2. TP dysfunction is widely implicated in pathophysiological conditions such as bleeding disorders, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Recently, we reported the characterization of a few constitutively active mutants (CAMs) in TP, including a genetic variant A160T. Using these CAMs as reporters, we now test the inverse agonist properties of known antagonists of TP, SQ 29,548, Ramatroban, L-670596 and Diclofenac, in HEK293T cells. Interestingly, SQ 29,548 reduced the basal activity of both, WT-TP and the CAMs while Ramatroban was able to reduce the basal activity of only the CAMs. Diclofenac and L-670596 showed no statistically significant reduction in basal activity of WT-TP or CAMs. To investigate the role of these compounds on human platelet function, we tested their effects on human megakaryocyte based system for platelet activation. Both SQ 29,548 and Ramatroban reduced the platelet hyperactivity of the A160T genetic variant. Taken together, our results suggest that SQ 29,548 and Ramatroban are inverse agonists for TP, whereas, L-670596 and Diclofenac are neutral antagonists. Our findings have important therapeutic applications in the treatment of TP mediated pathophysiological conditions.     

应用进化踪迹及分子动力学模拟研究beta2肾上腺素受体突变活性

β2肾上腺素受体(β2adrenergic receptor,β2AR)是G蛋白耦联受体(G protein coupled receptors,GPCRs)超家族中的一员,也是研究治疗哮喘的关键药物受体靶标.采用进化踪迹(evolutionary trace,ET)方法分析肾上腺素受体家族跨膜区片段序列,识别出了44个保守的残基,然后将β2肾上腺素受体以及受体D130N活性突变体、D79N失活突变体进行分子动力学模拟,试图找出与受体不同功能状态相关的结构动力学特征.发现受体DRY motif中的D130远离R131而转向K149残基这一结构特征与受体活性高度关联,此外,从残基相互作用的变化推断出了受体helix 2,4 and 6伴随着受体活化而发生的运动.这些研究结果对进一步探索β2肾上腺素受体突变体的激活机制以及所诱发疾病的分子机理提供了依据.     

The activation mechanism of chemokine receptor CCR5 involves common structural changes but a different network of interhelical interactions relative to rhodopsin

In G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the interaction between the cytosolic ends of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) and TM6 was shown to play an important role in the transition from inactive to active states. According to the currently prevailing model, constructed for rhodopsin and structurally related receptors, the arginine of the conserved "DRY" motif located at the cytosolic end of TM3 (R3.50) would interact with acidic residues in TM3 (D/E3.49) and TM6 (D/E6.30) at the resting state and shift out of this polar pocket upon agonist stimulation. However, 30% of GPCRs, including all chemokine receptors, contain a positively charged residue at position 6.30 which does not support an interaction with R3.50. We have investigated the role of R6.30 in this receptor family by using CCR5 as a model. R6.30D and R6.30E substitutions, which allow an ionic interaction with R3.50, resulted in an almost silent receptor devoid of constitutive activity and strongly impaired in its ability to bind chemokines but still able to internalize. R6.30A and R6.30Q substitutions, allowing weaker interactions with R3.50, preserved chemokine binding but reduced the constitutive activity and the functional response to chemokines. These results indicate that the constitutive and ligand-promoted activity of CCR5 can be modified by modulating the interaction between the DRY motif in TM3 and residues in TM6 suggesting that the overall structure and activation mechanism are well conserved in GPCRs. However, the molecular interactions locking the inactive state must be different in receptors devoid of D/E6.30.     

A Constitutively Internalizing and Recycling Mutant of the μ-Opioid Receptor

Abstract: Internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the μ-opioid receptor, largely depend on agonist stimulation, whereas certain other receptor types recycle constitutively, e.g., the transferrin receptor. To investigate structural domains involved in μ-opioid receptor internalization, we constructed two truncation mutants bracketing a Ser/Thr-rich domain (³⁵⁴ThrSerSerThrIleGluGlnGlnAsn³⁶²) unique to the C-terminus of the μ-opioid receptor (mutants Trunc354 and Trunc363). Ligand binding did not differ substantially, and G protein coupling was slightly lower for these μ-receptor constructs, in particular for Trunc363. To permit localization of the receptor by immunocytochemistry, an epitope tag was added to the N-terminus of the wildtype and mutant receptors. Both the wild-type μ-opioid receptor and Trunc363 resided largely at the plasma membrane and internalized into vesicles upon stimulation with the agonist [d -Ala²,N-Me-Phe⁴,Gly-ol⁵]-enkephalin. Internalization occurred into vesicles that contain transferrin receptors, as shown previously, as well as clathrin, but not caveolin. In contrast, even without any agonist present, Trunc354 colocalized in intracellular vesicles with clathrin and transferrin receptors, but not caveolin. On blocking internalization by hyperosmolar sucrose or acid treatment, Trunc354 translocated to the plasma membrane, indicating that the mutant internalized into clathrin-coated vesicles and recycled constitutively. Despite agonist-independent internalization of Trunc354, basal G protein coupling was not elevated, suggesting distinct mechanisms for coupling and internalization. Furthermore, a portion of the C-terminus, particularly the Ser/Thr domain, appears to suppress μ-receptor internalization, which can be overcome by agonist stimulation. These results demonstrate that a mutant GPCR can be constructed such that internalization, normally an agonist-dependent process, can occur spontaneously without concomitant G protein activation.     

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase-2 Constitutively Regulates D2 Dopamine Receptor Expression and Signaling Independently of Receptor Phosphorylation

We investigated the regulatory effects of GRK2 on D₂ dopamine receptor signaling and found that this kinase inhibits both receptor expression and functional signaling in a phosphorylation-independent manner, apparently through different mechanisms. Overexpression of GRK2 was found to suppress receptor expression at the cell surface and enhance agonist-induced internalization, whereas short interfering RNA knockdown of endogenous GRK2 led to an increase in cell surface receptor expression and decreased agonist-mediated endocytosis. These effects were not due to GRK2-mediated phosphorylation of the D₂ receptor as a phosphorylation-null receptor mutant was regulated similarly, and overexpression of a catalytically inactive mutant of GRK2 produced the same effects. The suppression of receptor expression is correlated with constitutive association of GRK2 with the receptor complex as we found that GRK2 and several of its mutants were able to co-immunoprecipitate with the D₂ receptor. Agonist pretreatment did not enhance the ability of GRK2 to co-immunoprecipitate with the receptor. We also found that overexpression of GRK2 attenuated the functional coupling of the D₂ receptor and that this activity required the kinase activity of GRK2 but did not involve receptor phosphorylation, thus suggesting the involvement of an additional GRK2 substrate. Interestingly, we found that the suppression of functional signaling also required the Gβγ binding activity of GRK2 but did not involve the GRK2 N-terminal RH domain. Our results suggest a novel mechanism by which GRK2 negatively regulates G protein-coupled receptor signaling in a manner that is independent of receptor phosphorylation.     

Oligomerization of the alpha and beta isoforms of the thromboxane A2 receptor: relevance to receptor signaling and endocytosis

Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) is a potent mediator of inflammation, vasoconstriction and oxidative stress. The TXA(2) receptor (TP) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is expressed as two alternatively spliced isoforms, alpha (343 residues) and beta (407 residues) that share the first 328 residues. For many years GPCRs were assumed to exist and function as monomeric species, but increasing evidence suggests that a dimer is the minimal functional unit of GPCRs. In the present report, using co-immunoprecipitation of differentially tagged TP expressed in HEK293 cells, we demonstrate that TPalpha and TPbeta form homo- and hetero-oligomers. Immunoblotting of lysates from human platelets with an anti-TP specific antibody revealed the presence of endogenously expressed TP oligomers. We show that TP oligomerization is an agonist-independent process highly affected by the reducing agent dithiothreitol suggesting the involvement of disulfide bonds in TP oligomerization. Over-expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins did not modulate the extent of receptor dimerization/oligomerization. Co-expression of two TP signaling-deficient mutants, R60L and E2402R, resulted in rescuing of receptor signal transduction suggesting that dimers/oligomers constitute the functional units of this receptor. Interestingly, TPalpha which does not undergo constitutive or agonist-induced endocytosis on its own was subjected to both types of endocytosis when co-expressed with TPbeta, indicating that TPalpha can display intracellular trafficking when complexed through hetero-oligomerization with TPbeta.     

Detection of G Protein-selective G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Conformations in Live Cells

Although several recent studies have reported that GPCRs adopt multiple conformations, it remains unclear how subtle conformational changes are translated into divergent downstream responses. In this study, we report on a novel class of FRET-based sensors that can detect the ligand/mutagenic stabilization of GPCR conformations that promote interactions with G proteins in live cells. These sensors rely on the well characterized interaction between a GPCR and the C terminus of a Gα subunit. We use these sensors to elucidate the influence of the highly conserved (E/D)RY motif on GPCR conformation. Specifically, Glu/Asp but not Arg mutants of the (E/D)RY motif are known to enhance basal GPCR signaling. Hence, it is unclear whether ionic interactions formed by the (E/D)RY motif (ionic lock) are necessary to stabilize basal GPCR states. We find that mutagenesis of the β2-AR (E/D)RY ionic lock enhances interaction with G_s. However, only Glu/Asp but not Arg mutants increase G protein activation. In contrast, mutagenesis of the opsin (E/D)RY ionic lock does not alter its interaction with transducin. Instead, opsin-specific ionic interactions centered on residue Lys-296 are both necessary and sufficient to promote interactions with transducin. Effective suppression of β2-AR basal activity by inverse agonist ICI 118,551 requires ionic interactions formed by the (E/D)RY motif. In contrast, the inverse agonist metoprolol suppresses interactions with G_s and promotes G_i binding, with concomitant pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. Taken together, these studies validate the use of the new FRET sensors while revealing distinct structural mechanisms for ligand-dependent GPCR function.     

Direct assessment of CXCR4 mutant conformations reveals complex link between receptor structure and G(alpha)(i) activation

Ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to induce changes in receptor conformation that translate into activation of downstream effectors. The link between receptor conformation and activity is still insufficiently understood, as current models of GPCR activation fail to take an increasing amount of experimental data into account. To elucidate structure-function relationships in GPCR activation, we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to directly assess the conformation of mutants of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. We analyzed substitutions in the arginine cage DRY motif and in the conserved asparagine N(3.35)119, which are pivotal molecular switches for receptor conformation and activation. G(alpha)(i) activation of the mutants was either similar to wild-type CXCR4 (D133N, Y135A, and N119D) or resulted in loss of activity (R134A and N119K). Mutant N119S was constitutively active but further activated by agonist. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis suggested no simple correlation between conformational changes in response to ligand binding and activation of G(alpha)(i) by the mutants. Different conformations of active receptors were detected (for wild-type CXCR4, D133N, and N119S), suggesting that different receptor conformations are able to trigger G(alpha)(i) activity. Several conformations were also found for inactive mutants. These data provide biophysical evidence for different receptor conformations being active with respect to a single readout. They support models of GPCR structure-activity relationships that take this conformational flexibility of active receptors into account.     

Communication over the Network of Binary Switches Regulates the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor

Dynamics and functions of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are accurately regulated by the type of ligands that bind to the orthosteric or allosteric binding sites. To glean the structural and dynamical origin of ligand-dependent modulation of GPCR activity, we performed total ~ 5 μsec molecular dynamics simulations of A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AAR) in its apo, antagonist-bound, and agonist-bound forms in an explicit water and membrane environment, and examined the corresponding dynamics and correlation between the 10 key structural motifs that serve as the allosteric hotspots in intramolecular signaling network. We dubbed these 10 structural motifs “binary switches” as they display molecular interactions that switch between two distinct states. By projecting the receptor dynamics on these binary switches that yield 2¹⁰ microstates, we show that (i) the receptors in apo, antagonist-bound, and agonist-bound states explore vastly different conformational space; (ii) among the three receptor states the apo state explores the broadest range of microstates; (iii) in the presence of the agonist, the active conformation is maintained through coherent couplings among the binary switches; and (iv) to be most specific, our analysis shows that W246, located deep inside the binding cleft, can serve as both an agonist sensor and actuator of ensuing intramolecular signaling for the receptor activation. Finally, our analysis of multiple trajectories generated by inserting an agonist to the apo state underscores that the transition of the receptor from inactive to active form requires the disruption of ionic-lock in the DRY motif.     

Complementary roles of the DRY motif and C-terminus tail of GPCRS for G protein coupling and beta-arrestin interaction

β-arrestin mediates the desensitization of GPCRs and acts as an adaptor molecule to recruit the receptor complex to clathrin-rich regions. Class-A GPCRs subsequently dissociate from β-arrestin but class-B GPCRs internalize with β-arrestin in the endocytic vesicles. Here the dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors, which have similar structural features but different intracellular trafficking properties, were used in an attempt to better understand the structural requirements for the classification of GPCRs. The C-terminus tail of the vasopressin type-2 receptor was added to the ends of D₂R and D₃R to increase their affinity to β-arrestin. A point mutation was introduced into the DRY motif to change their basal activation levels. Among a battery of constructs in which the C-terminus tail and/or DRY motif was altered, class-B behavior was observed with the constructs whose affinities for β-arrestin were increased complementarily and their signaling was either maintained or regained. In conclusion, the DRY motif and C-terminal tail of the GPCRs determine complementarily their intracellular trafficking behavior by regulating the affinity to β-arrestin and G protein coupling.     

The Active and the Inactive Form of the hAT1 Receptor Have an Identical Ligand-Binding Environment: An MPA Study on a Constitutively Active Angiotensin II Receptor Mutant

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁)¹ receptor mutant N111G-hAT₁ which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT₁ receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT₁ series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.     

The human formyl peptide receptor as model system for constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors

According to the two-state model of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation, GPCRs isomerize from an inactive (R) state to an active (R*) state. In the R* state, GPCRs activate G-proteins. Agonist-independent R/R* isomerization is referred to as constitutive activity and results in an increase in basal G-protein activity, i.e. GDP/GTP exchange. Agonists stabilize the R* state and further increase, whereas inverse agonists stabilize the R state and decrease, basal G-protein activity. Constitutive activity is observed in numerous wild-type GPCRs and disease-causing GPCR mutants with increased constitutive activity. The human formyl peptide receptor (FPR) exists in several isoforms (FPR-26, FPR-98 and FPR-G6) and activates chemotaxis and cytotoxic cell functions of phagocytes through G(i)-proteins. Studies in HL-60 leukemia cell membranes demonstrated inhibitory effects of Na(+) and pertussis toxin on basal G(i)-protein activity, suggesting that the FPR is constitutively active. However, since HL-60 cells express several constitutively active chemoattractant receptors, analysis of constitutive FPR activity was difficult. Sf9 insect cells do not express chemoattractant receptors and G(i)-proteins and provide a sensitive reconstitution system for FPR/G(i)-protein coupling. Such expression studies showed that FPR-26 is much more constitutively active than FPR-98 and FPR-G6 as assessed by the relative inhibitory effects of Na(+) and of the inverse agonist cyclosporin H on basal G(i)-protein activity. Site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that the E346A exchange in the C-terminus critically determines dimerization and constitutive activity of FPR. Moreover, N-glycosylation of the N-terminus seems to be important for constitutive FPR activity. Finally, we discuss some future directions of research.     

Structural features of the inactive and active states of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptors: insights from molecular simulations

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of both subtypes 1 and 2 of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor (MCHR1 and MCHR2, respectively) in their free and hormone-bound forms have been carried out. The hormone has been used in its full-length and truncated forms, as well as in 16 mutated forms. Moreover, MCHR1 has been simulated in complex with T-226296, a novel orally active and selective antagonist. The comparative analysis of an extended number of receptor configurations suggests that the differences between inactive (i.e., free and antagonist-bound) and active (i.e., agonist-bound) states of MCHRs involve the receptor portions close to the E/DRY and NPxxY motifs, with prominence to the cytosolic extensions of helices 2, 3, 6, and 7. In fact, the active forms of these receptors share the release of selected intramolecular interactions found in the inactive forms, such as that between R3.50 of the E/DRY motif and D2.40, and that between Y7.53 of the NPxxY motif and F7.60. Another feature of the active forms of both MCHRs is the approach of "helix 8" to the cytosolic extension of helix 3. These features of the active forms are concurrent with the opening of a cleft at the cytosolic end of the helix bundle. For both MCHRs, the agonist-induced chemical information transfer from the extracellular to the cytosolic domains is mediated by a cluster of aromatic amino acids in helix 6, following the ligand interaction with selected amino acids in the extracellular half of the receptor.     

Constitutive precoupling to G(i) and increased agonist potency in the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor

The human alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2B)-AR) was mutated by substituting the D(3.49) aspartate in position 109 with an alanine (alpha(2B)-D109A) in the conserved DRY sequence at the cytoplasmic face of TM3. We studied the effects of the mutation on agonist binding and on receptor activation in CHO cells, including possible inverse agonism monitored by measuring intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)). The mutated receptor had increased binding affinity for agonists, especially dexmedetomidine (3.8-fold). The increased affinity was abolished by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. The mutation produced constitutive receptor activity evidenced as increased basal [Ca(2+)](i) and increased potency and efficacy of agonists to elicit Ca(2+) responses. The imidazoline derivative RX821002 functioned as an inverse agonist only through the alpha(2B)-D109A, reducing [Ca(2+)](i). The results thus indicate that this mutation causes constitutive receptor-G(i)-protein precoupling, and that the D(3.49) aspartate residue of the DRY motif is involved in controlling coupled and uncoupled conformations of alpha(2B)-AR.     

Constitutive activation of the opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor by mutation of Asn133 to tryptophan in the third transmembrane region

We have introduced a series of point mutations into the human opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor and characterized them for their ability to constitutively activate G protein-coupled receptor signalling pathways. Among the 12 mutants generated, mutation at Asn133 (N133W) gave increased basal signalling through three separate pathways. N133W increased the basal activity of G14- and G16-dependent pathways by two- to three-fold. The constitutive activity of the mutant was confirmed by the finding that the enhanced activity is dependent on the level of receptor expression. In HEK-293 cells stably expressing N133W, signalling through Gi/o-dependent pathways was also observed. Radioligand binding studies revealed that the affinity for nociceptin of the wild-type ORL1 receptor and the N133W mutant do not differ significantly, suggesting that the ligand binding and signalling functions of constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors are not necessarily intrinsically linked. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that a mutation in the third transmembrane domain is able to increase the basal signalling activity of the human ORL1 receptor.     

Characterization of an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, GPR20, that constitutively activates Gi proteins

GPR20 was isolated as an orphan G protein-coupled receptor from genomic DNA by PCR amplification. Although GPR20 was closely related to nucleotide or lipid receptors, the functional role of this receptor, as well as its endogenous ligand, remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that GPR20 is constitutively active in the absence of ligand, leading to continuous activation of its coupled G proteins. When GPR20 was exogenously expressed in HEK293 cells, both the basal level and the prostaglandin E(2)-induced production of cAMP were significantly decreased. A remarkable increase in [(35)S]guanosine 5'-(gamma-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding to membrane preparations was also observed in GPR20-expressing cells. These effects of GPR20 overexpression were diminished in cells treated with pertussis toxin, suggesting that the expression of GPR20 results in the activation of G(i/o) proteins. Involvement of GPR20 in the activation of G(i/o) proteins was also supported by evidence that the disruption of a conserved DRY motif in GPR20 attenuated both [(35)S]GTPgammaS incorporation and inhibition of the prostaglandin E(2)-induced cAMP production. Knockdown of GPR20 in PC12h cells resulted in an elevation of the basal cAMP level, suggesting that the endogenous GPR20 achieves a constitutively or spontaneously active conformation. Furthermore, enhancement of [(3)H]thymidine incorporation was also observed in the GPR20-silencing cells, implying that the GPR20 expression seems to attenuate PC12h cell growth. Taken together, these data indicate that GPR20 constitutively activates G(i) proteins without ligand stimulation. The receptor may be involved in cellular processes, including control of intracellular cAMP levels and mitogenic signaling.