Conformational change of the transmembrane helices II and IV of metabotropic glutamate receptor involved in G protein activation

G protein-coupled receptors are classified into several families on the basis of their amino acid sequences and the members of the same family exhibit sequence similarity but those of different families do not. In family 1 GPCRs such as rhodopsin and adrenergic receptor, extensive studies have revealed the stimulus-dependent conformational change of the receptor: the rearrangement of transmembrane helices III and VI is essential for G protein activation. In contrast, in family 3 GPCRs such as metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), the inter-protomer relocation upon ligand binding has been observed but there is much less information about the structural changes of the transmsmbrane helices and the cytoplasmic domains. Here we identified constitutively active mutation sites at the cytoplasmic borders of helices II and IV of mGluR8 and successfully inhibited the G protein activation ability by engineering disulfide cross-linking between these cytoplasmic regions. The analysis of all possible single substitution mutants of these residues revealed that some steric interactions around these sites would be important to keep the receptor protein inactive. These results provided the model that the conformational changes at the cytoplasmic ends of helices II and IV of mGluR are involved in the efficient G protein coupling.     

From molecular details of the interplay between transmembrane helices of the thyrotropin receptor to general aspects of signal transduction in family a G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

Transmembrane helices (TMHs) 5 and 6 are known to be important for signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Our aim was to characterize the interface between TMH5 and TMH6 of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) to gain molecular insights into aspects of signal transduction and regulation. A proline at TMH5 position 5.50 is highly conserved in family A GPCRs and causes a twist in the helix structure. Mutation of the TSHR-specific alanine (Ala-593^5.50) at this position to proline resulted in a 20-fold reduction of cell surface expression. This indicates that TMH5 in the TSHR might have a conformation different from most other family A GPCRs by forming a regular α-helix. Furthermore, linking our own and previous data from directed mutagenesis with structural information led to suggestions of distinct pairs of interacting residues between TMH5 and TMH6 that are responsible for stabilizing either the basal or the active state. Our insights suggest that the inactive state conformation is constrained by a core set of polar interactions among TMHs 2, 3, 6, and 7 and in contrast that the active state conformation is stabilized mainly by non-polar interactions between TMHs 5 and 6. Our findings might be relevant for all family A GPCRs as supported by a statistical analysis of residue properties between the TMHs of a vast number of GPCR sequences.     

Identification of Three Residues Essential for 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A-Metabotropic Glutamate 2 (5-HT2A·mGlu2) Receptor Heteromerization and Its Psychoactive Behavioral Function

Serotonin and glutamate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) neurotransmission affects cognition and perception in humans and rodents. GPCRs are capable of forming heteromeric complexes that differentially alter cell signaling, but the role of this structural arrangement in modulating behavior remains unknown. Here, we identified three residues located at the intracellular end of transmembrane domain four that are necessary for the metabotropic glutamate 2 (mGlu2) receptor to be assembled as a GPCR heteromer with the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT_2A) receptor in the mouse frontal cortex. Substitution of these residues (Ala-677^4.40, Ala-681^4.44, and Ala-685^4.48) leads to absence of 5-HT_2A·mGlu2 receptor complex formation, an effect that is associated with a decrease in their heteromeric ligand binding interaction. Disruption of heteromeric expression with mGlu2 attenuates the psychosis-like effects induced in mice by hallucinogenic 5-HT_2A agonists. Furthermore, the ligand binding interaction between the components of the 5-HT_2A·mGlu2 receptor heterocomplex is up-regulated in the frontal cortex of schizophrenic subjects as compared with controls. Together, these findings provide structural evidence for the unique behavioral function of a GPCR heteromer.     

Comparative fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of metabotropic glutamate receptors: implications about the dimeric arrangement and rearrangement upon ligand bindings

Dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors has received much attention as a regulatory system of physiological function. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are suitable models for studying the physiological significance of G protein-coupled receptor dimers because they form constitutive homodimers and function through dimeric rearrangement of their extracellular ligand binding domains. However, the molecular architecture of the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and their rearrangement upon agonist binding are still largely unknown. Here we show that the two helix Vs are arranged as the closest part in the dimeric TMDs and change their positions through synergistic control by the binding of two glutamates. The possibility that helix V is involved in an inter-protomer communication was first suggested by the finding that constitutively active mutation sites were identified on both sides of helix V. Then, comprehensive fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis using mGluRs whose cytoplasmic loops were labeled with donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins revealed that the third intracellular loop connecting helices V and VI of one protomer was in close proximity to the second and third intracellular loops of the other protomer and that all the intracellular loops became closer during the activation. Furthermore, FRET analysis of heterodimers in which only one protomer had ligand binding ability revealed the synergistic effect of the binding of two glutamates on the dimeric rearrangements of the TMD. Thus, the glutamate-dependent synergistic relocation of the helix Vs in the dimer is important for the signal flow from the extracellular ligand binding domain to the cytoplasmic surface of the mGluR.     

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.     

Determinants of Endogenous Ligand Specificity Divergence among Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

To determine the structural origins of diverse ligand response specificities among metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), we combined computational approaches with mutagenesis and ligand response assays to identify specificity-determining residues in the group I receptor, mGluR1, and the group III receptors, mGluR4 and mGluR7. Among these, mGluR1 responds to l-glutamate effectively, whereas it binds weakly to another endogenous ligand, l-serine-O-phosphate (l-SOP), which antagonizes the effects of l-glutamate. In contrast, mGluR4 has in common with other group III mGluR that it is activated with higher potency and efficacy by l-SOP. mGluR7 differs from mGluR4 and other group III mGluR in that l-glutamate and l-SOP activate it with low potency and efficacy. Enhanced versions of the evolutionary trace (ET) algorithm were used to identify residues that when swapped between mGluR1 and mGluR4 increased the potency of l-SOP inhibition relative to the potency of l-glutamate activation in mGluR1 mutants and others that diminished the potency/efficacy of l-SOP for mGluR4 mutants. In addition, combining ET identified swaps from mGluR4 with one identified by computational docking produced mGluR7 mutants that respond with dramatically enhanced potency/efficacy to l-SOP. These results reveal that an early functional divergence between group I/II and group III involved variation at positions primarily at allosteric sites located outside of binding pockets, whereas a later divergence within group III occurred through sequence variation both at the ligand-binding pocket and at loops near the dimerization interface and interlobe hinge region. They also demonstrate the power of ET for identifying allosteric determinants of evolutionary importance.     

Inside story of Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors (mGluRs)

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate in the central nervous system. Among the eight subtypes, mGluR1 and mGluR5 belong to the group I family. These receptors play important roles in the brain and are believed to be involved in multiple forms of experience dependent synaptic plasticity including learning and memory. In addition, group I mGluRs also have been implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders like Fragile X syndrome, autism etc. The normal signaling depends on the precise location of these receptors in specific region of the neuron and the process of receptor trafficking plays a crucial role in controlling this localization. Intracellular trafficking could also regulate the desensitization, resensitization, down-regulation and intracellular signaling of these receptors. In this review I focus on the current understanding of group I mGluR regulation in the central nervous system and also their role in neuropsychiatric disorders.     

Single Molecule Analysis of Functionally Asymmetric G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Oligomers Reveals Diverse Spatial and Structural Assemblies

Formation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) into dimers and higher order oligomers represents a key mechanism in pleiotropic signaling, yet how individual protomers function within oligomers remains poorly understood. We present a super-resolution imaging approach, resolving single GPCR molecules to ∼8 nm resolution in functional asymmetric dimers and oligomers using dual-color photoactivatable dyes and localization microscopy (PD-PALM). PD-PALM of two functionally defined mutant luteinizing hormone receptors (LHRs), a ligand-binding deficient receptor (LHR^B−) and a signaling-deficient (LHR^S−) receptor, which only function via intermolecular cooperation, favored oligomeric over dimeric formation. PD-PALM imaging of trimers and tetramers revealed specific spatial organizations of individual protomers in complexes where the ratiometric composition of LHR^B− to LHR^S− modulated ligand-induced signal sensitivity. Structural modeling of asymmetric LHR oligomers strongly aligned with PD-PALM-imaged spatial arrangements, identifying multiple possible helix interfaces mediating inter-protomer associations. Our findings reveal that diverse spatial and structural assemblies mediating GPCR oligomerization may acutely fine-tune the cellular signaling profile.     

Opioid receptor random mutagenesis reveals a mechanism for G protein-coupled receptor activation

The high resolution structure of rhodopsin has greatly enhanced current understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structure in the off-state, but the activation process remains to be clarified. We investigated molecular mechanisms of delta-opioid receptor activation without a preconceived structural hypothesis. Using random mutagenesis of the entire receptor, we identified 30 activating point mutations. Three-dimensional modeling revealed an activation path originating from the third extracellular loop and propagating through tightly packed helices III, VI and VII down to a VI-VII cytoplasmic switch. N- and C-terminal determinants also influence receptor activity. Findings for this therapeutically important receptor may apply to other GPCRs that respond to diffusible ligands.     

Structural basis of M3 muscarinic receptor dimer/oligomer formation

Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to form dimers and/or oligomeric arrays in vitro and in vivo. These complexes are thought to play important roles in modulating class A GPCR function. Many studies suggest that residues located on the "outer" (lipid-facing) surface of the transmembrane (TM) receptor core are critically involved in the formation of class A receptor dimers (oligomers). However, no clear consensus has emerged regarding the identity of the TM helices or TM subsegments involved in this process. To shed light on this issue, we have used the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3R), a prototypic class A GPCR, as a model system. Using a comprehensive and unbiased approach, we subjected all outward-facing residues (70 amino acids total) of the TM helical bundle (TM1-7) of the M3R to systematic alanine substitution mutagenesis. We then characterized the resulting mutant receptors in radioligand binding and functional studies and determined their ability to form dimers (oligomers) in bioluminescence resonance energy transfer saturation assays. We found that M3R/M3R interactions are not dependent on the presence of one specific structural motif but involve the outer surfaces of multiple TM subsegments (TM1-5 and -7) located within the central and endofacial portions of the TM receptor core. Moreover, we demonstrated that the outward-facing surfaces of most TM helices play critical roles in proper receptor folding and/or function. Guided by the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer data, molecular modeling studies suggested the existence of multiple dimeric/oligomeric M3R arrangements, which may exist in a dynamic equilibrium. Given the high structural homology found among all class A GPCRs, our results should be of considerable general relevance.     

Membrane topology of a metabotropic glutamate receptor

The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been predicted to have a classical seven transmembrane domain structure similar to that seen for members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. However, the mGluRs (and other members of the family C GPCRs) show no sequence homology to the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, for which this seven transmembrane domain structure has been experimentally confirmed. Furthermore, several transmembrane domain prediction algorithms suggest that the mGluRs have a topology that is distinct from these receptors. In the present study, we set out to test whether mGluR5 has seven true transmembrane domains. Using a variety of approaches in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, our data provide strong support for the proposed seven transmembrane domain model of mGluR5. We propose that this membrane topology can be extended to all members of the family C GPCRs.     

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases of the GRK4 Protein Subfamily Phosphorylate Inactive G Protein-coupled Receptors (GPCRs)

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) play a key role in homologous desensitization of GPCRs. It is widely assumed that most GRKs selectively phosphorylate only active GPCRs. Here, we show that although this seems to be the case for the GRK2/3 subfamily, GRK5/6 effectively phosphorylate inactive forms of several GPCRs, including β2-adrenergic and M2 muscarinic receptors, which are commonly used as representative models for GPCRs. Agonist-independent GPCR phosphorylation cannot be explained by constitutive activity of the receptor or membrane association of the GRK, suggesting that it is an inherent ability of GRK5/6. Importantly, phosphorylation of the inactive β₂-adrenergic receptor enhanced its interactions with arrestins. Arrestin-3 was able to discriminate between phosphorylation of the same receptor by GRK2 and GRK5, demonstrating preference for the latter. Arrestin recruitment to inactive phosphorylated GPCRs suggests that not only agonist activation but also the complement of GRKs in the cell regulate formation of the arrestin-receptor complex and thereby G protein-independent signaling.     

Glutamate Regulates the Frequency of Spontaneous Synchronized Ca<Superscript>2+</Superscript> Spikes Through Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor in Cultured Mouse Cortical Networks

1. Synchronized spontaneous intracellular Ca²⁺ spikes in networked neurons are believed to play a major role in the development and plasticity of neural circuits. Glutamate-induced signals through the ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are profoundly involved in the generation of synchronized Ca²⁺ spikes.1 2. In this study, we examined the involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in cultured mouse cortical neurons. We pharmacologically revealed that glutamate-induced signals through inclusive mGluRs decreased the frequency of Ca²⁺ spikes. Further experiments indicated that this suppressive effect on the spike frequency was mainly due to the signal through group II mGluR, inactivation of adenylate cyclase-cAMP-PKA signaling pathway. Group I mGluR had little involvement in the spike frequency.3. Taken together, glutamate generates the synchronized Ca²⁺ spikes through iGluRs and modulates simultaneously their frequency through group II mGluR–adenylate cyclase–cAMP–PKA signaling pathway in the present in vitro neural network. These results provide the evidence of the profound role of group II mGluR in the spontaneous and synchronous neural activities.     

Formation of a Ternary Complex among NHERF1, β-Arrestin,and Parathyroid Hormone Receptor

β-Arrestins are crucial regulators of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, desensitization, and internalization. Despite the long-standing paradigm that agonist-promoted receptor phosphorylation is required for β-arrestin2 recruitment, emerging evidence suggests that phosphorylation-independent mechanisms play a role in β-arrestin2 recruitment by GPCRs. Several PDZ proteins are known to interact with GPCRs and serve as cytosolic adaptors to modulate receptor signaling and trafficking. Na⁺/H⁺ exchange regulatory factors (NHERFs) exert a major role in GPCR signaling. By combining imaging and biochemical and biophysical methods we investigated the interplay among NHERF1, β-arrestin2, and the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1 (PTHR). We show that NHERF1 and β-arrestin2 can independently bind to the PTHR and form a ternary complex in cultured human embryonic kidney cells and Chinese hamster ovary cells. Although NHERF1 interacts constitutively with the PTHR, β-arrestin2 binding is promoted by receptor activation. NHERF1 interacts directly with β-arrestin2 without using the PTHR as an interface. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies revealed that the kinetics of PTHR and β-arrestin2 interactions were modulated by NHERF1. These findings suggest a model in which NHERF1 may serve as an adaptor, bringing β-arrestin2 into close proximity to the PTHR, thereby facilitating β-arrestin2 recruitment after receptor activation.     

Allosteric activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is a class C G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with both an extracellular ligand binding site and an allosteric intrahelical chamber located similarly to the orthosteric ligand binding site of Class A GPCRs. Ligands binding to this ancestral site of mGluR5 can act as positive (PAM), negative (NAM) or silent (SAM) allosteric modulators, and their medicinal chemistry optimization is notoriously difficult, as subtle structural changes may cause significant variation in activity and switch in the functional response. Here we present all atom molecular dynamics simulations of NAM, SAM and PAM complexes formed by closely related ligands and analyse the structural differences of the complexes. Several residues involved in the activation are identified and the formation of a continuous water channel in the active complex but not in the inactive ones is recognized. Our results suggest that the mechanism of mGluR5 activation is similar to that of class A GPCRs.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma     

Selectivity and Evolutionary Divergence of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors for Endogenous Ligands and G Proteins Coupled to Phospholipase C or TRP Channels

To define the upstream and downstream signaling specificities of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR), we have examined the ability of representative mGluR of group I, II, and III to be activated by endogenous amino acids and catalyze activation of G proteins coupled to phospholipase C (PLC), or activation of G_i/o proteins coupled to the ion channel TRPC4β. Fluorescence-based assays have allowed us to observe interactions not previously reported or clearly identified. We have found that the specificity for endogenous amino acids is remarkably stringent. Even at millimolar levels, structurally similar compounds do not elicit significant activation. As reported previously, the clear exception is l-serine-O-phosphate (l-SOP), which strongly activates group III mGluR, especially mGluR4,-6,-8 but not group I or II mGluR. Whereas l-SOP cannot activate mGluR1 or mGluR2, it acts as a weak antagonist for mGluR1 and a potent antagonist for mGluR2, suggesting that co-recognition of l-glutamate and l-SOP arose early in evolution, and was followed later by divergence of group I and group II mGluR versus group III in l-SOP responses. mGluR7 has low affinity and efficacy for activation by both l-glutamate and l-SOP. Molecular docking studies suggested that residue 74 corresponding to lysine in mGluR4 and asparagine in mGluR7 might play a key role, and, indeed, mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that mutating this residue to lysine in mGluR7 enhances the potency of l-SOP. Experiments with pertussis toxin and dominant-negative Gα_i/o proteins revealed that mGluR1 couples strongly to TRPC4β through Gα_i/o, in addition to coupling to PLC through Gα_q/11.     

Structure of the Mouse Sex Peptide Pheromone ESP1 Reveals a Molecular Basis for Specific Binding to the Class C G-protein-coupled Vomeronasal Receptor

Exocrine gland-secreting peptide 1 (ESP1) is a sex pheromone that is released in male mouse tear fluids and enhances female sexual receptive behavior. ESP1 is selectively recognized by a specific class C G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), V2Rp5, among the hundreds of receptors expressed in vomeronasal sensory neurons (VSNs). The specific sensing mechanism of the mammalian peptide pheromone by the class C GPCR remains to be elucidated. Here we identified the minimal functional region needed to retain VSN-stimulating activity in ESP1 and determined its three-dimensional structure, which adopts a helical fold stabilized by an intramolecular disulfide bridge with extensive charged patches. We then identified the amino acids involved in the activation of VSNs by a structure-based mutational analysis, revealing that the highly charged surface is crucial for the ESP1 activity. We also demonstrated that ESP1 specifically bound to an extracellular region of V2Rp5 by an in vitro pulldown assay. Based on homology modeling of V2Rp5 using the structure of the metabotropic glutamate receptor, we constructed a docking model of the ESP1-V2Rp5 complex in which the binding interface exhibited good electrostatic complementarity. These experimental results, supported by the molecular docking simulations, reveal that charge-charge interactions determine the specificity of ESP1 binding to V2Rp5 in the large extracellular region characteristic of class C GPCRs. The present study provides insights into the structural basis for the narrowly tuned sensing of mammalian peptide pheromones by class C GPCRs.     

Glutamate and Quisqualate Regulate Expression of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor mRNA in Cultured Cerebellar Granule Cells

Abstract: Metabotropic glutamate receptor (type 1; mGluR1 ) is expressed predominantly in the hippocampus and the cerebellum. Using cultured cerebellar granule cells, we investigated the regulation of the mGluR1 mRNA expression. Levels of mGluR1 mRNA were decreased to less than half by high potassium stimulation and by glutamate and quisqualate. Although these glutamate receptor agonists tested are also known to cause neuronal cell death in culture, the effect of cell death cannot explain the observed reduction in mGluR1 mRNA because of the following reasons: (a) antagonists of N -methyl-D-aspartate and non- N -methyl-D-aspartate receptors inhibited cell death, but not the reduction of the level of mGluR1 mRNA; (b) mGluR1 mRNA returned to its initial level 48 h after the agonist application; and (c) the mRNA level of one of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate/kainate receptors (GluR1) was not altered by these conditions. Therefore, we conclude that the glutamate or quisqualate stimulation can specifically inhibit the expression of mGluR1 mRNA. The dose response of quisqualate for the reduction in mGluR1 mRNA is consistent with that for inositol phosphate formation stimulated through the cloned mGluR1 . The mRNA reduction did not require extracellular calcium. Desensitization of mGluR1 with phorbol ester abolished the mRNA reduction. These results suggest that the reduction in mGluR1 mRNA is mediated by the activation of the metabotropic receptor itself.     

G protein-coupled receptor kinase-mediated desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1A protects against cell death

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) constitute a unique subclass of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that bear little sequence homology to other members of the GPCR superfamily. The mGluR subtypes that are coupled to the hydrolysis of phosphoinositide contribute to both synaptic plasticity and glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity in neurons. In the present study, the expression of mGluR1a in HEK 293 cells led to agonist-independent cell death. Since G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) desensitize a diverse variety of GPCRs, we explored whether GRKs contributed to the regulation of both constitutive and agonist-stimulated mGluR1a activity and thereby may prevent mGluR1a-mediated excitotoxicity associated with mGluR1a overactivation. We find that the co-expression of mGluR1a with GRK2 and GRK5, but not GRK4 and GRK6, reduced both constitutive and agonist-stimulated mGluR1a activity. Agonist-stimulated mGluR1a phosphorylation was enhanced by the co-expression of GRK2 and was blocked by two different GRK2 dominant-negative mutants. Furthermore, GRK2-dependent mGluR1a desensitization protected against mGluR1a-mediated cell death, at least in part by blocking mGluR1a-stimulated apoptosis. Our data indicate that as with other members of the GPCR superfamily, a member of the structurally distinct mGluR family (mGluR1a) serves as a substrate for GRK-mediated phosphorylation and that GRK-dependent "feedback" modulation of mGluR1a responsiveness protects against pathophysiological mGluR1a signaling.