Ablations of areas 3b (SI proper) and 3a of somatosensory cortex in marmosets deactivate the second and parietal ventral somatosensory areas

Partial ablations of specific parts of cortical areas 3b (SI proper) and 3a in marmosets were found to render somatotopically equivalent parts of two other cortical somatosensory fields, the second somatosensory area (SII) and the parietal ventral area (PV), unresponsive to peripheral stimulation. Microelectrode recordings in anesthetized marmosets first established the responsiveness and locations of the representations of body parts, including the hand in areas 3a and 3b, SII, and in some cases PV. The hand representations in areas 3a and 3b were then removed by aspiration. Immediately afterwards, additional recordings established that regions of SII and PV that formerly represented the hand were no longer responsive to cutaneous stimulation of the hand (or any other skin surface). Other parts of these fields, representing parts of the body other than the hand, remained responsive to stimulation of the previously effective receptive fields. We conclude that SII and PV depend on inputs (either direct or indirect) from areas 3a and 3b for their activation.     

Areal Distributions of Cortical Neurons Projecting to Different Levels of the Caudal Brain Stem and Spinal Cord in Rats

Distributions of corticospinal and corticobulbar neurons were revealed by tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) processing after injections of wheatgerm agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA:HRP) into the cervical or lumbar enlargements of the spinal cord, or medullary or pontine levels of the brain stem. Sections reacted for cytochrome oxidase (CO) allowed patterns of labeled neurons to be related to the details of the body surface map in the first somatosensory cortical area (SI). The results indicate that a number of cortical areas project to these subcortical levels: (1) Projection neurons in granular SI formed a clear somatotopic pattern. The hindpaw region projected to the lumbar enlargement, the forepaw region to the cervical enlargement, the whisker pad field to the lower medulla, and the more rostral face region to more rostral brain stem levels. (2) Each zone of labeled neurons in SI extended into adjacent dysgranular somatosensory cortex, forming a second somatotopic pattern of projection neurons. (3) A somatotopic pattern of projection neurons in primary motor cortex (MI) paralleled SI in mediolateral sequence corresponding to the hindlimb, forelimb, and face. (4) A weak somatotopic pattern of projection neurons was suggested in medial agranular cortex (Ag_m), indicating a premotor field with a rostromedial-to-caudolateral representation of hindlimb, forelimb, and face. (5) A somatotopic pattern of projection neurons representing the foot to face in a mediolateral sequence was observed in medial parietal cortex (PM) located between SI and area 17. (6) In the second somatosensory cortical area (SII), neurons projecting to the brain stem were immediately adjacent caudolaterally to the barrel field of SI, whereas neurons projecting to the upper spinal cord were more lateral. No projection neurons in this region were labeled by the injections in the lower spinal cord. (7) Other foci of projection neurons for the face and forelimb were located rostral to SII, providing evidence for a parietal ventral area (PV) in perirhinal cortex (PR) lateral to SI, and in cortex between SII and PM. None of these regions, which may be higher-order somatosensory areas, contained labeled neurons after injections in the lower spinal cord. Thus, more cortical fields directly influence brain stem and spinal cord levels related to sensory and motor functions of the face and forepaw than the hindlimb.

The termination patterns of corticospinal and corticobulbar projections were studied in other rats with injections of WGA:HRP in SI. Injections in lateral SI representing the face produced dense terminal label in the contralateral trigeminal complex. Injections in cortex devoted to the forelimb and forepaw labeled the contralateral cuneate nucleus and parts of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The cortical injections also demonstrated interconnections of parts of SI with some of the other regions of cortex with projections to the spinal cord, and provided further evidence for the existence of PV in rats.     

Areal distributions of cortical neurons projecting to different levels of the caudal brain stem and spinal cord in rats

Distributions of corticospinal and corticobulbar neurons were revealed by tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) processing after injections of wheatgerm agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA:HRP) into the cervical or lumbar enlargements of the spinal cord, or medullary or pontine levels of the brain stem. Sections reacted for cytochrome oxidase (CO) allowed patterns of labeled neurons to be related to the details of the body surface map in the first somatosensory cortical area (SI). The results indicate that a number of cortical areas project to these subcortical levels: (1) Projection neurons in granular SI formed a clear somatotopic pattern. The hindpaw region projected to the lumbar enlargement, the forepaw region to the cervical enlargement, the whisker pad field to the lower medulla, and the more rostral face region to more rostral brain stem levels. (2) Each zone of labeled neurons in SI extended into adjacent dysgranular somatosensory cortex, forming a second somatotopic pattern of projection neurons. (3) A somatotopic pattern of projection neurons in primary motor cortex (MI) paralleled SI in mediolateral sequence corresponding to the hindlimb, forelimb, and face. (4) A weak somatotopic pattern of projection neurons was suggested in medial agranular cortex (Agm), indicating a premotor field with a rostromedial-to-caudolateral representation of hindlimb, forelimb, and face. (5) A somatotopic pattern of projection neurons representing the foot to face in a mediolateral sequence was observed in medial parietal cortex (PM) located between SI and area 17. (6) In the second somatosensory cortical area (SII), neurons projecting to the brain stem were immediately adjacent caudolaterally to the barrel field of SI, whereas neurons projecting to the upper spinal cord were more lateral. No projection neurons in this region were labeled by the injections in the lower spinal cord. (7) Other foci of projection neurons for the face and forelimb were located rostral to SII, providing evidence for a parietal ventral area (PV) in perirhinal cortex (PR) lateral to SI, and in cortex between SII and PM. None of these regions, which may be higher-order somatosensory areas, contained labeled neurons after injections in the lower spinal cord. Thus, more cortical fields directly influence brain stem and spinal cord levels related to sensory and motor functions of the face and forepaw than the hindlimb. The termination patterns of corticospinal and corticobulbar projections were studied in other rats with injections of WGA:HRP in SI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Spatial principle of organization of specific afferent projections and generation of evoked potentials in the somatosensory cortex

Here we investigate the functional organization of structures involved in sensory analysis in a restricted region of a cortical projection area. We have shown that stimulation of somatosensory areas I and II (SI and SII) may block an afferent volley at the level of the thalamic relay nucleus, and that SII may be selectively blocked by stimulation of SI. Also definite somatosensory connections have been demonstrated between SII, SI, and the motor cortex. We suggest that common mechanisms underlie the generation of focal reactions in projection areas of the cortex induced by stimulation of various structures. The properties of two groups of neurones from area SII are described: those having a short latency and receiving direct projections from the thalamic relay nucleus, and those of long latent period with a well-marked convergence, and reacting to stimulation of various afferent pathways. It is suggested that each path to a local point of a cortical projection areas terminates with its relay element. The signal is then directed to a common intracortical system of neurones where signals from various sources occurs (afferent, interhemispherical, subcortico-cortical, and intracortical) converge and interact. All groups of neurones are involved in the formation of the common components of evoked potentials.Presented to the All-Union Symposium: "Electrical responses of the cerebral cortex to afferent stimuli," Kiev, October, 1969.Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 155–165, March–April, 1970.     

Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a totally non-invasive research method which provides information about cortical dynamics on a millisecond time-scale. Whole-scalp magnetic field patterns following stimulation of different peripheral nerves indicate activation of an extensive cortical network. At the SI cortex, the responses reflect mainly the activity of area 3b, with clearly somatotopical representations of different body parts. The SII cortex is activated bilaterally and it also receives, besides tactile input, nociceptive afference. Somatically evoked MEG signals may also be detected from the posterior parietal cortex, central mesial cortex and the frontal lobe. The serial versus parallel processing in the cortical somatosensory network is still under debate.     

Responses in the First or Second Somatosensory Cortical Area in Cats during Transient Inactivation of the Other Ipsilateral Area with Lidocaine Hydrochloride

Simultaneous recordings were obtained from the primary and secondary somatosensory cortical areas (SI and SII) in cats anesthetized with ketamine or pentobarbital. A total of 40 individual neurons were studied (29 in SII and 11 in SI) before, during, and following injections of microliter quantities of lidocaine hydrochloride in the other ipsilateral cortical area. Activity in the cortex injected with the local anesthetic was monitored with single-neuron, multi-neuron, or evoked potential responses to determine the time course of inactivation within 0.5-2 mm of the injection sites. Recording sites in both cortical locations were in the representations of the distal forelimb. Responses were elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation across the receptive fields with needle electrodes. Short-latency responses were synchronously activated, and, in those circumstances where single neurons were isolated in both areas, no overall differences in latency were noted. Anesthetization of either cortical area never blocked access of somatosensory information to the intact area, even when the injected cortex was completely silenced in the vicinity of the injection mass. In 15 SII neurons and 7 SI neurons, changes were seen in short-latency evoked responses to stimulation of their receptive fields or in background activity following local anesthesia of the other area through several cycles of injection and recovery. In 7 of these 15 SII cells, changes were noted in the timing and/or firing rates of the short-latency responses; changes were noted in the short-latency responses of 2 of these 7 SI cells while SII was silenced. In 11 SII and 6 SI cells, “background” activity that was recorded during the interstimulus intervals either increased (most cases) or decreased during local anesthesia of the other area. The results are discussed in reference to the hypothesis that primary sensory cortical areas feed information forward to secondary areas, and these feed back modulatory controls to the primary regions.     

Multiple Representations of the Body and Input-Output Relationships in the Agranular and Granular Cortex of the Chronic Awake Guinea Pig

The organization of somatosensory input and the input-output relationships in regions of the agranular frontal cortex (AGr) and granular parietal cortex (Gr) were examined in the chronic awake guinea pig, using the combined technique of single-unit recording and intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). AGr, which was cytoarchitectonically subdivided into medial (AGrm) and lateral (AGrl) parts, also can be characterized on a functional basis. AGrl contains the head, forelimb, and most hindlimb representations; only a small number of hindlimb neurons are confined in AGrm. Different distributions of submodalities exist in AGr and Gr: AGr receives predominantly deep input (with the exception of the vibrissa region, which receives cutaneous input), whereas neurons of Gr respond almost exclusively to cutaneous input. The cutaneous or deep receptive field (RF) of each neuron was determined by natural peripheral stimulation. All studied neurons were activated by small RFs, with the exception of lip, nose, pinna, and limb units of lateral Gr (Grl), for which the RFs were larger.

Microelectrode mapping experiments revealed the existence of three spatially separate, incomplete body maps in which somatosensory and motor representations overlap. One body map, with limbs medially and head rostrolaterally, is contained in AGr. A second map, comparable to the first somatosensory cortex (SI) of other mammals, is found in Gr, with hindlimb, trunk, forelimb, and head representations in an orderly mediolateral sequence. An unresponsive zone separates the head area from the forelimb region. A third map, with the forelimb rostrally and the hindlimb caudally, lies adjacent and lateral to the SI head area. This limb representation, which is characterized by an upright and small size compared to that found in SI, can be considered to be part of the second somatosensory cortex (SII). A distinct head representation was not recognized as properly belonging to SII, but the evidence that neurons of the SI head region respond to stimulation of large RFs located in lips, nose, and pinna leads us to hypothesize that the SII face area overlaps that of SI to some extent, or, alternatively, that the two areas are strictly contiguous and the limits are ambiguous, making them difficult to distinguish.

The input-output relationships were based on the results of RF mapping and ICMS in the same electrode penetration. The intrinsic specific interconnections of cortical neurons whose afferent input and motor output is related to identical body regions show a considerable degree of refinement. The input-output correspondence is especially pronounced for neurons with small RFs. This study confirms and extends similar data recently reported for other rodents.     

The organization of somatosensory cortex in the short-tailed opossum ( Monodelphis domestica )

The organization of neocortex in the short-tailed opossum ( Monodelphis domestica ) was explored with multiunit microelectrode recordings from middle layers of cortex. Microelectrode maps were subsequently related to the chemoarchitecture of flattened cortical preparations, sectioned parallel to the cortical surface and processed for either cytochrome oxidase (CO) or NADPH-diaphorase (NADPHd) histochemistry. The recordings revealed the presence of at least two systematic representations of the contralateral body surface located in a continuous strip of cortex running from the rhinal sulcus to the medial wall. The primary somatosensory area (S1) was located medially while secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) formed a laterally located mirror image of S1. Auditory cortex was located in lateral cortex at the caudal border of S2, and some electrode penetrations in this area responded to both auditory and somatosensory stimulation. Auditory cortex was outlined by a dark oval visible in flattened brain sections. A large primary visual cortex (V1) was located at the caudal pole of cortex, and also consistently corresponded to a large chemoarchitecturally visible oval. Cortex just rostral and lateral to V1 responded to visual stimulation, while bimodal auditory/visual responses were obtained in an area between V1 and somatosensory cortex. The results are compared with brain organization in other marsupials and with placentals and the evolution of cortical areas in mammals is discussed.     

Somatotopic Organization of the Third Somatosensory Area (SIII) in Cats

Multiunit microelectrode recording techniques were used to study the location and organization of the third somatosensory area (SIII) in cats. Representations of all major contralateral body parts were found in a small region of cortex along the lateral wing of the ansate sulcus and between the lateral sulcus and the suprasylvian sulcus. The systematic map of the body surface included forepaw and face regions previously identified as parts of SIII. The forepaw representation was generally buried on the rostral bank of the lateral wing of the ansate sulcus. The representations of the face and mystacial vibrissae were largely exposed on the rostral suprasylvian gyrus, but part of the representation of the face was also buried in the lateral wing of the ansate sulcus. Representations of the trunk and hindlimb extended from the suprasylvian gyrus onto the medial bank of the suprasylvian sulcus. We had expected to find these latter body parts in more medial cortex just caudal to the representation of these parts in the first somatosensory area (SI). Instead, neurons in penetrations in cortex caudal to the SI trunk and hindlimb representations were unresponsive to tactile stimulation. The unexpected location of the hindlimb in SIII led us to determine whether the proposed parts of SIII had similar cortical and thalamic connections. Injected anatomical tracers revealed that the representations of both the forelimb and hindlimb were interconnected with SI and a region of the thalamus just dorsal to the ventroposterior nucleus. Similarities in patterns of connections of forelimb and hindlimb portions of SIII supported the conclusion that SHI as presented here is a functional unit of cortex. We conclude that SIII has a somatotopic organization that does not parallel that in SI, and that SIII is not entirely coextensive with either area 5 or area 5a of Hassler and Muhs-Clement (1964).     

The organization of somatosensory cortex in the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica)

The organization of neocortex in the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) was explored with multiunit microelectrode recordings from middle layers of cortex. Microelectrode maps were subsequently related to the chemoarchitecture of flattened cortical preparations, sectioned parallel to the cortical surface and processed for either cytochrome oxidase (CO) or NADPH-diaphorase (NADPHd) histochemistry. The recordings revealed the presence of at least two systematic representations of the contralateral body surface located in a continuous strip of cortex running from the rhinal sulcus to the medial wall. The primary somatosensory area (S1) was located medially while secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) formed a laterally located mirror image of S1. Auditory cortex was located in lateral cortex at the caudal border of S2, and some electrode penetrations in this area responded to both auditory and somatosensory stimulation. Auditory cortex was outlined by a dark oval visible in flattened brain sections. A large primary visual cortex (V1) was located at the caudal pole of cortex, and also consistently corresponded to a large chemoarchitecturally visible oval. Cortex just rostral and lateral to V1 responded to visual stimulation, while bimodal auditory/visual responses were obtained in an area between V1 and somatosensory cortex. The results are compared with brain organization in other marsupials and with placentals and the evolution of cortical areas in mammals is discussed.     

Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: location and activation timing of SEF sources

Cortical areas responsive to somatosensory inputs were assessed by recording somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEF) to electrical stimulation of the left median nerve at wrist, using a 122-SQUID neuromagnetometer in various conditions of stimulus rate, attentional demand and detection task. Source modelling combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allowed localisation of six SEF sources on the outer aspect of the hemispheres located respectively: (1) in the posterior bank of the rolandic fissure (area SI), the upper bank of the sylvian fissure (parietal opercular area SII) and the banks of the intraparietal fissure contralateral to stimulation, (2) in the SII area ipsilateral to stimulation and (3) in the mid-frontal or inferior frontal gyri on both sides. All source areas were found to be simultaneously active at 70–140 ms after the stimulus, the SI source was the only one active already at 20–60 ms. The observed activation timing suggests that somatosensory input from SI is processed to higher-order areas through serial feedforward projections. However the long-lasting activations of all sources and their overlap in time is also compatible with a top-down control mediated via backward projections.     

Somatosensory areas S2 and PV project to the superior colliculus of a prosimian primate, Galago garnetti

As part of an effort to describe the connections of the somatosensory system in Galago garnetti, a small prosimian primate, injections of tracers into cortex revealed that two somatosensory areas, the second somatosensory area (S2) and the parietal ventral somatosensory area (PV), project densely to the ipsilateral superior colliculus, while the primary somatosensory area (S1 or area 3b) does not. The three cortical areas were defined in microelectrode mapping experiments and recordings were used to identify appropriate injection sites in the same cases. Injections of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) were placed in S1 in different mediolateral locations representing body regions from toes to face in five galagos, and none of these injections labeled projections to the superior colliculus. In contrast, each of the two injections in the face representation of S2 in two galagos and three injections in face and forelimb representations of PV in three galagos produced dense patches of labeled terminations and axons in the intermediate gray (layer IV) over the full extent of the superior colliculus. The results suggest that the higher-order somatosensory areas, PV and S2, are directly involved in the visuomotor functions of the superior colliculus in prosimian primates, while S1 is not. The somatosensory inputs appear to be too widespread to contribute to a detailed somatotopic representation in the superior colliculus, but they may be a source of somatosensory modulation of retinotopically guided oculomotor instructions.     

Somatosensory areas S2 and PV project to the superior colliculus of a prosimian primate,Galago garnetti

As part of an effort to describe the connections of the somatosensory system in Galago garnetti, a small prosimian primate, injections of tracers into cortex revealed that two somatosensory areas, the second somatosensory area (S2) and the parietal ventral somatosensory area (PV), project densely to the ipsilateral superior colliculus, while the primary somatosensory area (S1 or area 3b) does not. The three cortical areas were defined in microelectrode mapping experiments and recordings were used to identify appropriate injection sites in the same cases. Injections of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) were placed in S1 in different mediolateral locations representing body regions from toes to face in five galagos, and none of these injections labeled projections to the superior colliculus. In contrast, each of the two injections in the face representation of S2 in two galagos and three injections in face and forelimb representations of PV in three galagos produced dense patches of labeled terminations and axons in the intermediate gray (layer IV) over the full extent of the superior colliculus. The results suggest that the higher-order somatosensory areas, PV and S2, are directly involved in the visuomotor functions of the superior colliculus in prosimian primates, while S1 is not. The somatosensory inputs appear to be too widespread to contribute to a detailed somatotopic representation in the superior colliculus, but they may be a source of somatosensory modulation of retinotopically guided oculomotor instructions.     

Unit responses of the first and second somatosensory cortical areas to peripheral,thalamic, and cortical stimulation

Unit responses of the first (SI) somatosensory area of the cortex to stimulation of the second somatosensory area (SII), the ventral posterior thalamic nucleus, and the contralateral forelimb, and also unit responses in SII evoked by stimulation of SI, the ventral posterior thalamic nucleus, and the contralateral forelimb were investigated in experiments on cats immobilized with D-tubocurarine or Myo-Relaxin (succinylcholine). The results showed a substantially higher percentage of neurons in SII than in SI which responded to an afferent stimulus by excitation brought about through two or more synaptic relays in the cortex. In response to cortical stimulation antidromic and orthodromic responses appeared in SI and SII neurons, confirming the presence of two-way cortico-cortical connections. In both SI and SII intracellular recording revealed in most cases PSPs of similar character and intensity, evoked by stimulation of the cortex and nucleus in the same neuron. Latent periods of orthodromic spike responses to stimulation of nucleus and cortex in 50.5% of SI neurons and 37.1% of SII neurons differed by less than 1.0 msec. In 19.6% of SI and 41.4% of SII neurons the latent period of response to cortical stimulation was 1.6–4.7 msec shorter than the latent period of the response evoked in the same neuron by stimulation of the nucleus. It is concluded from these results that impulses from SI play an important role in the afferent activation of SII neurons.A. A. Bogomolets Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 351–357, July–August, 1976.     

Functional topography of afferent projections of the horizontal division of the nucleus of the diagonal band in the dorsolateral neocortex of the cat

EPs recording under Nembutal anaesthesia during stimulation of the medial section of the horizontal part of the diagonal band nucleus (HNDB) shows a wide spreading of HNDB afferentation over the neocortex: from the frontal area to the medial and some posterior parts of the auditory, parietal areas and Ep zone, with the least activation of the latter three regions and activation increasing intensity correspondingly in the somatic zones II, I (SII, SI), motor and frontal cortex. Such reduction of signals flow intensity oriented both in caudal and ventral directions of the cortex goes with foci of maximal activity of these signals in the motor, parietal areas and zones of representation of various body parts in SI and SII. Traits of similarity and differences of signal's projections in the neocortex from HNDB and thalamic relay nuclei have been revealed. A hypothesis is substantiated on different mechanisms underlying peculiarities of influences of these subcortical nuclei on the cortex depending on the type of their afferent-neuronal links in the latter and their functional role in the brain activity.     

Sustained Spatial Attention to Vibrotactile Stimulation in the Flutter Range: Relevant Brain Regions and Their Interaction

The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was designed to get a better understanding of the brain regions involved in sustained spatial attention to tactile events and to ascertain to what extent their activation was correlated. We presented continuous 20 Hz vibrotactile stimuli (range of flutter) concurrently to the left and right index fingers of healthy human volunteers. An arrow cue instructed subjects in a trial-by-trial fashion to attend to the left or right index finger and to detect rare target events that were embedded in the vibrotactile stimulation streams. We found blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) attentional modulation in primary somatosensory cortex (SI), mainly covering Brodmann area 1, 2, and 3b, as well as in secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), contralateral to the to-be-attended hand. Furthermore, attention to the right (dominant) hand resulted in additional BOLD modulation in left posterior insula. All of the effects were caused by an increased activation when attention was paid to the contralateral hand, except for the effects in left SI and insula. In left SI, the effect was related to a mixture of both a slight increase in activation when attention was paid to the contralateral hand as well as a slight decrease in activation when attention was paid to the ipsilateral hand (i.e., the tactile distraction condition). In contrast, the effect in left posterior insula was exclusively driven by a relative decrease in activation in the tactile distraction condition, which points to an active inhibition when tactile information is irrelevant. Finally, correlation analyses indicate a linear relationship between attention effects in intrahemispheric somatosensory cortices, since attentional modulation in SI and SII were interrelated within one hemisphere but not across hemispheres. All in all, our results provide a basis for future research on sustained attention to continuous vibrotactile stimulation in the range of flutter.     

SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. III. Dipole source localization analysis

The dipole source localization method was used to determine which of the brain areas known to be involved in somatosensation are the best candidate generators of the somatosensory evoked potential evoked by sural nerve stimulation. The ipsilateral central negativity and contralateral frontal positivity which occurred between 58 and 90 msec post stimulus (stable period 1) were best represented by a single source located in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). The symmetrical central negativity and bilateral frontal positivity which occurred between 92 and 120 msec post stimulus (stable period 2) was best represented by 3 sources. One of these sources was located in SI and the other 2 were located bilaterally in either the frontal operculum or near the second somatosensory cortex (SII). The widespread negativity whose minimum was located in the contralateral fronto-temporal region and which occurred between 135 and 157 msec post stimulus (stable period 3) was also best represented by 3 sources. Two of these sources may be located bilaterally in the hippocampus. We cannot, however, eliminate the possibility that multiple sources in the cortex overlying the hippocampus (e.g., SII and frontal cortex) are responsible for these potentials. At innocuous stimulus levels the third source for stable period 3 was located near the vertex, possibly involving the supplementary motor cortex, whereas at noxious levels this source appears to be located in the cingulate cortex. We were unable to achieve any convincing source localization for the widespread positivity which occurred between 178 and 339 msec post stimulus (stable periods 4–6). Available evidence suggests that more sources were active during this interval than the three we could reliably test under these conditions.     

Role of sensory signals in the development of cortical influences on hypothalamic structures]

Neuron discharges of the hypothalamic ventro-medial and posterior nuclei were registered in immobilized cats during electrical stimulation of the ipsi- and contralateral nerves of the brachial plexus, the 1st and the 2nd somatosensory regions (SI and SII) and the visual regions of the cortex and the reticular formation (RF) of the mesencephalon. A reversible cold block of the SI and SII failed to change the effect of the nerve stimulation. Stimulation of the postero-ventral thalamic nucleus did not change the initial activity of the hypothalamic neurons and gave rise to no neuron activity that appeared on stimulation of the SII. A conclusion was drawn that cortico-hypothalamic influences that appeared on stimulation of the nerves and the postero-ventral nucleus of the thalamus were pronounced weakly.     

Tactile motion and pattern processing assessed with high-field FMRI

Processing of motion and pattern has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but much less in the somatosensory system. Here, we used ultra-high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 7 Tesla to investigate the neuronal correlates of tactile motion and pattern processing in humans under tightly controlled stimulation conditions. Different types of dynamic stimuli created the sensation of moving or stationary bar patterns during passive touch. Activity in somatosensory cortex was increased during both motion and pattern processing and modulated by motion directionality in primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII) as well as by pattern orientation in the anterior intraparietal sulcus. Furthermore, tactile motion and pattern processing induced activity in the middle temporal cortex (hMT+/V5) and in the inferior parietal cortex (IPC), involving parts of the supramarginal und angular gyri. These responses covaried with subjects' individual perceptual performance, suggesting that hMT+/V5 and IPC contribute to conscious perception of specific tactile stimulus features. In addition, an analysis of effective connectivity using psychophysiological interactions (PPI) revealed increased functional coupling between SI and hMT+/V5 during motion processing, as well as between SI and IPC during pattern processing. This connectivity pattern provides evidence for the direct engagement of these specialized cortical areas in tactile processing during somesthesis.     

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following stimulation of the lip in humans

The topography of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following stimulation of the upper and lower lips was investigated in 6 normal subjects. When the lateral side of the upper lip was stimulated. P20m and its counterpart, N20m, were identified in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated side. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of N20m-P20m were considered to be located in the lip area of the primary sensory cortex (SI). Middle latency deflections (N40m-P40m, N60m-P60m, and N80m-P80m) were identified in bilateral hemispheres. Their ECDs were located in the SI in both hemispheres. Long latency deflections (P110m-N110m) were recognized in both hemispheres, and their ECDs were located inferior to the SI, in an area considered to be the secondary sensory cortex (SII). When the midline of the lip was stimulated, similar short and middle latency deflections were also identified, but SII deflections (P110m-N110m) were decreased in amplitude. When the lower lip was stimulated, the ECDs of short and middle latency deflections were located at a site in the SI inferior to or near those elicited by upper lip stimulation. The ECDs of P110m-N110m were located in an area of the SII similar to that upon stimulation of the upper lip, but their orientations were different.