Treatment with progesterone affects follicular steroidogenesis in anoestrous ewes

Ovaries were recovered from two groups (n=6/group) of anoestrous Romney Marsh ewes, one group of which had been treated with progesterone implants prior to slaughter. A comparison was made between the maturational characteristics of the follicles > 2 mm diameter recovered from both groups and some significant differences were noted. In particular, the large follicles (> 4 mm diameter) recovered from the progesterone-treated ewes had a significantly (P<0.01) reduced capacity to secrete oestradiol, but enhanced (P<0.01) ability to bind hCG when compared to follicles recovered from control ewes. There were also differences in the relationships between follicular characteristics in the two groups of animals including a significant (P <0.05) correlation between follicular fluid progesterone and hCG binding to theca tissue in large follicles from progesterone-treated animals which did not exist in the control animals. Conversely, in the control animals a significant (P<0.05) relationship existed between oestradiol production and hCG binding to granulosa cells, but there was no such relationship in the follicles from progesterone-treated ewes. These results demonstrate that the treatment of ewes with progesterone during the anoestrous period clearly affects oestradiol synthesis and hCG binding and thus modifies follicular development.     

Response of anestrous ewes to the ram effect after follicular wave synchronization with a single dose of estradiol-17beta

Anestrous ewes respond to the introduction of rams with either an ovulation within 2-3 days that may be followed by luteal phases of normal or short length, with delayed ovulations (5-6 days later), or with the luteinization of follicles. The aim of this work was to study the relationship between the growth status of the largest follicle present when rams are introduced and the type of ovarian response in non-treated ewes and in ewes treated with estradiol-17beta before ram introduction. Thirteen anestrous Corriedale ewes were divided into 2 groups: E2 (n = 7) and C (n = 6). The E2 ewes received a single dose of 50 microg estradiol-17beta 5 days before the introduction of the rams to synchronize the onset of their follicle waves, while C ewes remained untreated. When the rams were introduced, all E2 ewes had the largest follicle in a growing stage in contrast with the C ewes (3 out of 6; P < 0.05). Five C and 4 E2 ewes ovulated after the introduction of the rams (Day 3.4 +/- 0.4 for C vs. 4.8 +/- 0.3 for E2 ewes, respectively, P < 0.05). Only one ewe from each group developed a normal luteal phase: 4 C and 3 E2 ewes had short luteal phases. One C ewe and 2 E2 ewes had short luteal phases originating from follicles that did not ovulate. After the first luteal phase, all ewes returned to anesirus without a second ovulation or luteal phase. The remaining E2 ewe did not ovulate or show any changes in progesterone serum concentrations. We conclude that the growth status of the largest follicle alone does not determine the ovarian responding pattern of anestrous ewes to the ram effect.     

Effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus

The effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus were investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the introduction of rams induced an increase in the levels of LH in entire ewes. The mean levels increased from 0.68 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.) to 4.49 +/- 1.32 ng/ml within 20 min in ewes not treated with progesterone (n = 10). In ewes bearing progesterone implants that provided a peripheral concentration of about 1.5 ng progesterone per millilitre plasma, the LH response to the introduction of rams was not prevented, but was reduced in size so that the concentration was 1.38 +/- 0.15 ng/ml after 20 min (n = 5). Progesterone treatment begun either 2 days before or 6 h after the introduction of rams and maintained for 4 days prevented ovulation. In the second experiment ovariectomized ewes were used to investigate further the mechanism by which the ram evoked increases in tonic LH secretion. In ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants, the introduction of rams increased the frequency of the LH pulses and the basal level of LH. In the absence of oestradiol there was no significant change in pulse frequency but a small increase in basal levels. Progesterone again did not prevent but reduced the responses in ewes treated with oestradiol. It is suggested that following the withdrawal of progesterone treatment, the secretion of LH pulses in response to the ram effect would be dampened. This effect could be a component of the reported long delay between the introduction of rams and the preovulatory surge of LH in ewes treated with progesterone. Continued progesterone treatment prevented ovulation, probably by blocking positive feedback by oestradiol.     

Effect of ram exposure at the end of progestagen treatment on estrus synchronisation and fertility during the breeding season in ewes

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of ram exposure during the breeding season, in combination with progestagen treatment on estrus synchronization, fertility the LH surge and ovulation in ewes. Experiment 1 was subdivided into experiments 1a and 1b. In all experiments cross-bred ewes were treated with an intravaginal sponge for 12-14 days and three days before sponge withdrawal ewes were divided into control (no further treatment; n=191, 103 and 50 for experiments 1a, 1b and 2, respectively) or ram exposed (three mature rams per 50 ewes were introduced; +Ram; n=187, 99 and 49 for experiments 1a, 1b and 2, respectively). At sponge withdrawal ewes in Experiments 1a and 2 received 500 IU eCG and rams were removed from all the +Ram groups. In Experiments 1a and 1b, raddled, entire rams were introduced to ewes 48 h after sponge withdrawal. The timing of mating was recorded and ewes were maintained until lambing. In Experiment 2, estrus behavior was determined every 4 h and the time of the LH surge and ovulation were determined from a subset of 10 ewes per group. In Experiment 1a, less +Ram ewes were bred by 48 h after ram introduction (control 98% versus +Ram 89%, P<0.001) and in Experiments 1a and 1b 14% fewer (P<0.05) of the ewes bred in the first 3 h after ram introduction lambed to that service. In Experiment 1a, ram exposed ewes had a lower litter size than control ewes (1.93+/-0.06 versus 1.70+/-0.06 lambs per ewe; P<0.05). In Experiment 2, rams advanced (P<0.05) estrus, the LH surge and ovulation by 2-6 h compared with control ewes. We speculate that exposure of ewes to rams increased LH secretion and that this in turn increased follicle development and the production of oestradiol that led to a more rapid onset of estrus, the LH surge and ovulation compared to control ewes. Unexpectedly, ewes that were bred had lower fertility in the +Ram groups than control groups.     

Response of prepubertal ewes primed with monensin or progesterone to administration of FSH

Prepubertal ewe lambs were treated with FSH after progesterone priming for 12 days (Group P), monensin supplementation for 14 days (Group M) or a standard diet (Group C). Serial blood samples were taken for LH and progesterone assay, and ovariectomy was performed on half of each group 38-52 h after start of treatment to assess ovarian function, follicular steroid production in vitro and the concentration of gonadotrophin binding sites in follicles. The remaining ewe lambs were ovariectomized 8 days after FSH treatment to determine whether functional corpora lutea were present. FSH treatment was followed by a preovulatory LH surge which occurred significantly later (P less than 0.05) and was better synchronized in ewes in Groups P and M than in those in Group C. At 13-15 h after the LH surge significantly more large follicles were present on ovaries from Group P and M ewes than in Group C. Follicles greater than 5 mm diameter from ewes in Groups P and M produced significantly less oestrogen and testosterone and more dihydrotestosterone, and had significantly more hCG binding sites, than did similar-sized follicles from Group C animals. Ovariectomy on Day 8 after the completion of FSH treatment showed that ewes in Groups P and M had significantly greater numbers of functional corpora lutea. These results indicate that, in prepubertal ewes, progesterone priming and monensin supplementation may delay the preovulatory LH surge, allowing follicles developing after FSH treatment more time to mature before ovulation. This may result in better luteinization of ruptured follicles in these ewes, with the formation of functional corpora lutea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ram-induced growth of ovarian follicles and gonadotrophin inhibition in anoestrous ewes

Southdown ewes in mid-seasonal anoestrus were exposed to rams for 0 h (control group), 2 h, 24 h, 40 h, 3 days, 10 days or 20 days. Serial blood samples were then taken to determine LH and FSH levels. Ewes with greater than 24 h ram exposure were ovariectomized immediately after bleeding, and all follicles greater than 1 mm diameter were dissected from the ovaries and measured. LH basal concentrations and pulse frequency increased significantly within 2 h of ram introduction, but by 24 h fell, and then remained low. FSH concentrations fell within 2 h of ram introduction and remained low. Control group ewes (isolated) had no follicles greater than 4 mm diameter, whereas all ewes exposed to rams had large follicles, with CL or preovulatory follicles present at 40 h after ram introduction. Ram introduction was also associated with follicle recruitment (antrum formation to less than 2 mm). Follicular recruitment and development to the large follicle stage therefore occurred during a period of low plasma gonadotrophin levels and suppressed LH pulsing.     

Melanin concentrating hormone (MCH) in the cerebrospinal fluid of ewes during spontaneous oestrous cycles and ram effect induced follicular phases

The melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a neuropeptide synthesized by neurons of the lateral hypothalamus and incerto-hypothalamic area that project throughout the central nervous system. The aims of the present report were: (1) to determine if MCH levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of ewes vary between the mid-luteal and the oestrous phase of spontaneous oestrous cycles; and (2) to study if MCH levels in CSF of ewes vary acutely during the follicular phase induced with the ram effect in anoestrous ewes. In the first experiment, CSF was collected from 8 adult ewes during spontaneous oestrous and during the mid-luteal phase (8-10 days after natural oestrus). In the second experiment, performed during the mid non-breeding season, a follicular phase was induced with the ram effect. After isolating a group of 16 ewes from rams, CSF was obtained from 5 of such ewes (control group). Three rams were joined with the ewes, and samples were obtained 12h (n=6) and 24h (n=5) later. In Experiment 1, there were no differences in MCH concentrations in CSF measured during the mid-luteal phase and spontaneous oestrus (0.14 ± 0.04 vs. 0.16 ± 0.05 ng/mL respectively). In Experiment 2, MCH concentrations tended to increase 12h after rams introduction (0.15 ± 0.08 vs. 0.35 ± 0.21 ng/mL, P=0.08), and increased significantly 24h after rams introduction (0.37 ± 0.15 ng/mL, P=0.02). We concluded that MCH concentration measured in the CSF from ewes increased markedly during the response to the ram effect but not during the natural oestrous cycle of ewes.     

Reproductive response and LH secretion in ewes treated with melatonin implants and induced to ovulate with the ram effect

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of treating seasonally anoestrous ewes with melatonin before ram introduction on reproductive response, and on LH secretion in anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate by rams.In Experiment 1, a total of 667 ewes from three flocks involving Merino (Flock 1, N = 149), Merino entrefino (Flock 2, N = 325) and Rasa Aragonesa (Flock 3, N = 203) breeds were used. Within each flock, ewes isolated from rams since the previous lambing were assigned at random to receive melatonin implants of Regulin (75, 175 and 105 in Merino, Merino entrefino and Rasa Aragonesa flocks, respectively) or to serve as untreated controls (74 in Merino, 150 in Merino entrefino and 98 in Rasa Aragonesa flocks). Fertile rams were introduced into all flocks 5 weeks after implantation in March (Flocks 1 and 2) or April (Flock 3), and remained with the ewes for a 50 day mating period. Percentage of ewes with luteal activity at ram introduction did not differ between melatonin treated and control ewes in any flock. There were no significant differences in either the mean interval from ram introduction to lambing or the distribution of lambing. Implantation with melatonin resulted in an improvement of prolificacy in all three flocks, although this only reached statistical significance in the Merino flock (1.15 vs. 1.03 in treated and control ewes, respectively, P < 0.05). Fertility was increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the Merino entrefino flock (64.5% in treated vs. 51.3% in control ewes).In Experiment 2, two trials were undertaken utilizing a total of 63 ewes. Trial 1 involved 24 mature Manchega ewes and Trial 2 involved 39 Merino ewe lambs. Half of the animals in each trial received a Regulin implant on 28 February (Trial 1) or 12 March (Trial 2) and the remaining half acted as controls. Rams were introduced 5 weeks after implantation and remained with the ewes for a 25 day period. In both trials, anoestrous ewes at ram introduction were bled at 20 min intervals for 3 h before and 5 h after ram introduction and then at 3 h intervals over the next 24 h for assessment of plasma concentrations of LH. Secretion of LH before or following introduction of rams was not affected by melatonin. Both treated and control anoestrous ewes in each trial responded to introduction of rams with an increase in the frequency of the LH pulses (P < 0.05), but no significant changes were detected in pulse amplitude or mean levels of LH. A preovulatory surge of LH was detected between 8 and 26 h after ram introduction, but neither mean interval from ram introduction to the peak of LH surge, nor the magnitude of the LH peak, was influenced by melatonin treatment.Results from this study show that: (1) melatonin implants administered during early seasonal anoestrus have the potential to improve reproductive performance in Spanish breeds of sheep, but the response is conditioned by breed, management system and environmental factors; (2) melatonin did not modify the secretion of LH in anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate by the ram effect under our experimental conditions.     

Endocrine and Ovarian Changes in Response to the Ram Effect in Medroxyprogesterone Acetate-primed Corriedale Ewes During the Breeding and Nonbreeding Season

Two experiments were performed to determine the endocrine and ovarian changes in medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP)-primed ewes after ram introduction. Experiment 1 was performed during the mid-breeding season with 71 ewes primed with an intravaginal MAP sponge for 12 days. While the control (C) ewes (n = 35) were in permanent contact with rams, the ram effect (RE) ewes (n = 36) were isolated for 34 days prior to contact with rams. At sponge withdrawal, all ewes were joined with eight sexually experienced marking Corriedale rams and estrus was recorded over the next 4 days. The ovaries were observed by laparoscopy 4–6 days after estrus. Four weeks later, pregnancy was determined by transrectal ultrasonography. In eight ewes from each group, ovaries were ultrasonographically scanned; FSH, LH, and estradiol-17β were measured every 12 hours until ovulation or 96 hours after estrus. The response to the rams was not affected by the fact that ewes had been kept or not in close contact with males before teasing. No differences were found in FSH, LH, estradiol-17β concentrations, growth of the ovulatory follicle, onset of estrus, ovulation rate, or pregnancy rate. Experiment 2 was performed with 14 ewes during the nonbreeding season. Ewes were isolated from rams for 1 month, and received a 6-day MAP priming. Ovaries were ultrasonographically scanned every 12 hours, and FSH, LH, estradiol-17β, and progesterone were measured. Ewes that ovulated and came into estrus had higher FSH and estradiol-17β levels before introduction of the rams than did ewes that had a silent ovulation. The endocrine pattern of the induced follicular phase of ewes that came into estrus was more similar to a normal follicular phase, than in ewes that had a silent ovulation. The follicle that finally ovulated tended to emerge earlier and in a more synchronized fashion in those ewes that did come into estrus. All ewes that ovulated had an LH surge and reached higher maximum FSH levels than ewes that did not ovulate, none of which had an LH surge. We conclude that (a) the effect of ram introduction in cyclic ewes treated with MAP may vary depending on the time of the breeding season at which teasing is performed; (b) patterns of FSH, and estradiol-17β concentrations, as indicators of activity of the reproductive axis, may be used to classify depth of anestrus; and (c) the endocrine pattern of the induced follicular phase, which is related to the depth of anestrus, may be reflected in the behavioral responses to MAP priming and the ram effect.     

Importance of behavioural stimuli in ram-induced ovulation in seasonally anovular Corriedale ewes

Three groups of about 65 seasonally anovular Corriedale ewes were penned and exposed to rams on November 4, 1989. A fourth group (n=64) was maintained in a 3-ha paddock and also exposed to rams on the same date. The sexual behaviour exhibited by rams in contact with penned ewes was recorded during nine simultaneous observation sessions lasting 2 h each.

Five days after ram introduction, incidence of ovulation and ovulation rate were higher (P < 0.01) in adult than in 1.5-year-old ewes. Among penned adult ewes, a greater (P < 0.05) incidence of ovulation was recorded in ewes maintained in contact with rams and oestrous ewes (95.8%) than in ewes exposed to either rams with or without recent experience with oestrous ewes (68.7 and 57.1%, respectively). The fourth group, exposed to rams in field conditions, exhibited a lower (P < 0.05) incidence of ovulation (31.9%) than any other group. No differences among treatments were detected in 1.5-year-old ewes. The incidence of ovulation was associated (r=0.99, P<0.05) with the sexual behaviour displayed by the rams.

It was concluded that the sexual behaviour of the rams plays an important role in ram-induced ovulation and that the continuous presence of oestrous ewes is necessary for the maximum efficacy of the technique in Corriedale ewes.     

Progesterone pretreatment has a direct effect on GnRH-induced preovulatory follicles to determine their ability to develop into normal corpora lutea in anoestrous ewes

In two experiments carried out during seasonal anoestrus, Romney Marsh ewes were treated with small-dose (250 ng) multiple injections of GnRH at 2-h intervals with and without progesterone pretreatment. In Exp. 1, 8/8 progesterone-primed ewes ovulated and produced functionally normal corpora lutea compared with 2/9 non-primed ewes. Follicles were recovered from similarly treated animals 18 or 28 h after the start of GnRH treatment (at least 14 h before the estimated time of the LH peak) and assessed in terms of diameter, granulosa cell number, oestradiol, testosterone and progesterone concentrations in the follicular fluid, oestradiol production in vitro and binding of 125I-labelled hCG to granulosa and theca. There were no significant differences in any of these measures in 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the progesterone-pretreated compared to non-pretreated animals. In Exp. 2, follicles were removed from similar treatment groups just before and 2 h after the start of the LH surge. Unlike 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the non-pretreated ewes, those recovered from progesterone-pretreated ewes responded to the LH surge by significantly increasing oestradiol secretion (P less than 0.01) and binding of 125I-labelled hCG (P less than 0.05) to granulosa cells. Overall there was also more (P less than 0.05) hCG binding to granulosa and theca cells from progesterone-pretreated animals. Non-ovulatory follicles recovered from progesterone-primed ewes had more (P less than 0.05) binding of 125I-labelled hCG to theca and a higher testosterone concentration in follicular fluid (P less than 0.05) than did those from non-primed ewes. These results suggest that inadequate luteal function after repeated injections of GnRH may be due to a poor response to the LH surge indicative of a deficiency in the final maturational stages of the follicle.     

Effects of recent sexual experience and melatonin treatment of rams on plasma testosterone concentration, sexual behaviour and ability to induce ovulation in seasonally anoestrous ewes

The aim of this study was to determine whether advancing the seasonal changes associated with rams by treatment with exogenous melatonin and allowing the rams previous sexual experience would increase the proportion of anoestrous ewes ovulating in early July. North Country Mule ewes (n = 225) were grouped by live body weight and body condition score and allocated randomly to the following treatments: (i) isolated from rams (control; n = 25); (ii) introduced to rams (treatment 2); (iii) introduced to rams that had mated with ewes during the previous 2 days (treatment 3); (iv) introduced to rams implanted with melatonin (treatment 4); and (v) introduced to rams that were implanted with melatonin and had mated with ewes during the previous 2 days (treatment 5). Treatments 2-5 were replicated (2 x 25 ewes) and two rams were introduced to each replicate group. Introductions began on 4 July and were completed by 11 July. The rams were withdrawn from the ewes after 8 days. Melatonin was administered as a subcutaneous implant (Regulin((R))) on 22 May and again on 20 June. Blood samples were taken from all rams to determine plasma melatonin and testosterone concentrations (19 samples in 6 h). The behaviour of the sheep was videotaped continuously during the first 3 h after the ram was introduced. Ovulation was detected by an increase in plasma progesterone concentrations from < 0.5 ng ml(-1) to > 0.5 ng ml(-1). Mean +/- SE plasma melatonin concentrations were 649.7 +/- 281.4 and 18.3 +/- 2.4 pg ml(-1) in rams with and without melatonin implants, respectively (P < 0.001). Melatonin implants also increased plasma testosterone concentrations from 4.30 +/- 1.88 to 10.10 +/- 1.10 ng ml(-1) (P < 0.01), the libido of the rams and the proportion of ewes that ovulated in response to the rams (43 and 56% (treatments 4 and 5) versus 24% (treatments 2 and 3)). In conclusion, implanting rams with melatonin before introducing them to seasonally anoestrous ewes increases the proportion of ewes that ovulate in response to introduction of a ram, but previous sexual experience of rams appears to have little or no effect.     

Onset of the preovulatory LH surge and of oestrus in intact ewes: Night is a preferred period

Oestrous cycles were induced in seasonally anoestrous ewes by introducing rams into the flock and giving to the ewes one intramuscular injection of 20 mg progesterone. At the second ovulation the onset of oestrus and the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) were recorded. It was found that the LH surge began in significantly more ewes during the night (79%) than during the day (21%). The onset of oestrus tended to follow a similar pattern. This temporal pattern was not related to the time of ram introduction, but may be the result of daily rhythms in ovarian activity. Furthermore, a preferred period for the LH surge indicates a preferred period for ovulation and this may be important in deciding when to begin artificial insemination.     

Importance of non-olfactory ram stimuli in mediating ram-induced ovulation in the ewe

In Exp. 1, 4 groups of 50 recently weaned ewes were exposed to various degrees of contact with rams for 65 days, followed by exposure to novel rams for 4 days. Ovarian activity in the ewes was determined by laparoscopy on Days 29, 65 and 69 of treatment. There were no treatment differences in the percentage of ewes ovulating on Day 4 whereas by Day 29 more ewes in clear fenceline and full ram contact were ovulating compared to controls (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.001). After 65 days ovarian activity was significant only in those ewes in full contact with rams (P less than 0.001). Between 89 and 95% of ewes remaining anovulatory after 65 days ovulated after 4 days of full contact with novel rams. In Exp. 2, 4 groups of about 30 anovulatory ewes were exposed to various degrees of contact with rams for 5 days. Ovarian activity was assessed before and after treatment by laparoscopy. After 5 days, more ewes were ovulating in response to full ram contact than in any other treatment (P less than 0.05) and more ewes in fenceline contact with rams or with rams plus ewes were ovulating than in the isolated control treatment (P less than 0.01). In Exp. 3, 6 groups of about 40 anovulatory ewes were exposed to face masks with and without rams' wool and/or various degrees of contact with rams for 5 days. More ewes were ovulating after 5 days in the group in full physical contact with rams than in any other group (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of melatonin implants on the response to the male effect and on the subsequent cyclicity of Rasa Aragonesa ewes implanted in April

Rasa Aragonesa ewes were used to evalutate whether treatment with melatonin implants in spring could modify: (i) the response to the male effect in terms of oestrous behaviour and ovulation rate; and (ii) the maintenance of sexual activity and ovulation rate at medium term, i.e. over the next 306 days. On 12 April, 42 ewes were divided into two groups, with (M; n = 21) or without (C; n = 21) a subcutaneous implant containing 18 mg melatonin. On 17 May (day 0), three aproned rams were introduced to each group to induce a ram effect. Ewes were observed for oestrus daily. The rams were removed 40 days later after which one aproned ram was introduced daily. Oestrous detection continued until 28 February, 306 days after the first male-female contact. The ovulation rate was determined by endoscopy in the first three cycles after ram introduction and in September-October and January. Progesterone was assayed from blood samples taken on 6 May, 10 and from day 0 to day 22 after ram introduction. Luteal activity before ram introduction was seen in 33% (M) and 29 (C)% of the ewes, respectively. Significantly more M ewes showed oestrous behaviour during the first 40 days after ram introduction (M: 100%; C: 62%; P < 0.01). Similar differences were observed for ewes anovulatory at ram introduction (M: 100%, C: 47%; P < 0.01). These differences were maintained over the three oestrous cycles in both groups. Treatment with melatonin implants was without detrimental effect on cyclic functions in the following breeding season, after seasonal anoestrus. Melatonin treatment significantly increased (P < 0.05) the mean ovulation rate of the first (1.62 +/- 0.11 versus 1.31 +/- 0.13), second (1.78 +/- 0.15 versus 1.36 +/- 0.15) and third cycles (M: 1.73 +/- 0.12 versus C: 1.27 +/- 0.14). There was a significant interaction between the effects of cyclicity at day 0 and melatonin treatment on the ovulation rate in the first cycle (P < 0.05). The mean ovulation rates of both groups were similar at the beginning (September) and middle (January) of the subsequent breeding season. Overall, the results confirmed that melatonin implants, combined with the ram effect, improved the reproductive parameters of reduced-seasonality ewes during spring mating, without impairing sexual activity or ovulation rate during the subsequent breeding season.     

Effect of the introduction of rams during the anoestrous season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

Introduction of rams to ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants (N = 10) increased the frequency of LH pulses from 4 X 8 to 10 X 6 pulses per 12 h. This effect was reflected by increases in mean levels of LH and the basal levels upon which the pulses were superimposed. In ewes that had not been treated with oestradiol (N = 5), there was no significant increase in pulse frequency but mean and basal levels of LH increased slightly after the introduction of rams. In a second experiment, similar effects of the introduction of rams were seen in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol or oestradiol + androstenedione (N = 16), but no significant effects of the rams were observed in untreated ewes (N = 8) or ewes treated only with androstenedione (N = 7). No preovulatory surges of LH were observed in the 30-h period after the introduction of rams. It was concluded that the ram stimulus probably evokes the increase in pulse frequency by inhibiting the negative feedback action of oestradiol, and that the surge normally observed in entire ewes is dependent on the ovarian response to these pulses. However, the observation of responses in some ewes not treated with oestradiol also raises the possibility that the ram stimulus can act directly on the hypothalamic neurones that control the secretion of LH, and that this effect is enhanced in the presence of oestrogen.     

Diurnal variation in the response of anoestrous ewes to the ram effect

The re-introduction of rams after a period of separation was used to stimulate LH secretion and induce ovulation in seasonally anovulatory ewes maintained under natural photoperiod. In 2 experiments, the rams were introduced in the morning or the evening to test for diurnal variations in responsiveness to the treatment. In the first experiment, with Romanov ewes, the ram-induced increase in tonic LH secretion was significantly earlier in the ewes treated (N = 6) at 07:30 h (mean +/- s.e.m. delay to first pulse: 20 +/- 6 min) than in those (N = 5) treated at 19:30 h (66 +/- 15 min; P = 0.006). The pulse interval after the ram effect was significantly shorter in ewes that subsequently ovulated (120 +/- 10 min) than in ewes that did not ovulate (288 +/- 108 min; P = 0.043). There was a significant decline in pulse amplitude from 6.7 +/- 1.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.6 ng/ml (both groups combined) after the introduction of rams (P = 0.040). Of the 11 ewes, 7 subsequently ovulated and a preovulatory LH surge was observed in 6 of these 30-36 h after ram introduction. In the second experiment, with seasonally anoestrous Préalpes-du-Sud ewes, the effect of the timing of the introduction of rams on the periovulatory events was tested. The delay to the onsets of oestrus and the LH surge was not affected, but the ovulation rate was higher after ram introduction in the morning (1.42) than in the evening (1.14). In the 12-h period before the introduction of the rams in the first experiment, there was a difference between the groups in the secretion of LH, but the existence of diurnal rhythms in the concentrations of LH or FSH were not confirmed in a later study in which 7 ewes were sampled every 20 min for 36 h. In contrast, there was a distinct diurnal variation in the secretion of prolactin, with the highest values being recorded at night and the lowest around midday (P = 0.025). The rise and fall in prolactin values did not appear to coincide with dawn or dusk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Mechanism controlling ovulation rate in ewes in relation to seasonal anoestrus.

Three experiments were carried out during seasonal anoestrus in Finnish Landrace and Scottish Blackface ewes, to establish whether the differences between the breeds in ovulation rate are functional during the non-breeding season and are therefore independent of the mechanism controlling ovulation. In Expt 1, follicles greater than or equal to 2 mm in diameter were dissected from the ovaries of both breeds and incubated individually for 2 h to assess their ability to secrete oestradiol and testosterone. In both breeds, follicles producing greater than or equal to 500 pg oestrogen/ml/h (oestrogen-active) were readily identifiable from a population producing less (oestrogen-inactive). The number of oestrogen-active follicles in each breed was similar to the number of ovulations near the end of the breeding season. Oestrogen-active follicles also had more luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors and larger diameters than oestrogen-inactive follicles. There were, however, no significant differences between the two follicle types in follicular fluid or in-vitro testosterone concentrations. In Expt 2, seasonally anoestrous Scottish Blackface ewes were unilaterally ovariectomized; the second ovary was removed 7 days later. Follicles from both ovaries were processed as described for Expt 1; oestrogen-active follicles were categorized according to their ability to produce greater than 500 pg/ml/h. There were twice as many oestrogen-active follicles in the second ovary as in the first ovary; the number of oestrogen-active follicles in the second ovary was also similar to the total number of oestrogen-active follicles in both ovaries of the Scottish Blackface ewes in Expt 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effects of ram exposure during progestagen oestrus synchronisation and time of ram introduction post progestagen withdrawal on fertility in ewes

Three experiments were undertaken to investigate the effect of a pre-mating ram exposure during progestagen synchronisation treatment on time of breeding, ovulation rate, embryo quality and fertility and any interaction with time of ram introduction for breeding post sponge withdrawal. Crossbred ewes in experiment 1a (n = 348), 1b (mule; n = 133) and 2 (n = 58) underwent a 12-14 days synchronisation protocol. Three days prior to sponge withdrawal ewes were divided into Control (ewes in continued isolation from rams) or +Ram (ram-exposed) groups. Rams were introduced to +Ram ewes and remained with ewes until sponge withdrawal. Ewes in experiments 1a and 2 received eCG at sponge withdrawal and were reintroduced to rams at either 36 or 48 h post sponge removal (PSR). In experiment 1b, ewes did not receive eCG and were reintroduced to rams at 24 h PSR. In experiments 1a and 1b time of breeding, date of lambing and litter size were recorded. In experiment 2, ewes were slaughtered 5 days post breeding, reproductive tracts flushed and corpora lutea, ova and embryos assessed. Fewer +Ram ewes were mated by 96 h PSR (P < 0.001) than Control ewes in experiment 1a but not when rams were introduced earlier in experiment 1b. In experiment 1a, ram introduction at 36 h PSR improved conception to first service compared to introduction at 48 h PSR (P < 0.01) in both +Ram and Control groups. In experiments 1a and 1b, +Ram ewes had reduced litter size caused by more single births (1a; P < 0.001, 1b; P < 0.01). In experiment 2, +Ram ewes had fewer corpora lutea than Control ewes (P < 0.001) but embryo quality was similar. However, more good embryos were produced when rams were introduced for breeding at 36 h compared to 48 h PSR (P < 0.001). We conclude that a pre-mating ram exposure during the synchronisation treatment reduced the number of ewes mated at and conceiving to the first service. This was partially overcome by introducing rams for breeding earlier (24 or 36 h compared to 48 h PSR) but the most dramatic decrease in fertility was due to a reduction in ovulation rate in the ram-exposed ewes.     

Short term, repeated exposure to rams during the transition into the breeding season improves the synchrony of mating in the breeding season

The ram effect is widely used in Mediterranean breeds of sheep but its use in temperate genotypes is restricted by breed seasonality. However, ewes from these highly seasonal genotypes are sensitive to stimulation by rams close to the onset of the natural breeding season. In this study we developed a pre-mating protocol of repeated, short-term exposure to rams (fence-line contact or vasectomised rams) beginning during late anoestrus and continuing into the breeding season. We hypothesised that this pre-mating protocol would synchronise the distribution of mating of North of England Mule ewes during the breeding season above that observed in ewes isolated from rams prior to mating. Ram-exposed ewes were given contact with rams (Experiment 1: fence-line; FR, n = 94 and Experiment 2: vasectomised rams; VR; n = 103) for 24 h on Days 0 (10 September), 17 and 34 of the experiment. Control ewes (Experiment 1; FC, n = 98 and Experiment 2; VC; n = 106) remained isolated from rams prior to mating. In Experiment 2, a subset of VR (n = 35) and VC ewes (n = 35) were blood sampled twice weekly to monitor their pre-mating progesterone profiles. At mating, harnessed entire rams were introduced, 17 or 16 days after the last ram exposure (Experiments 1 and 2) and raddle marks were recorded daily. The median time from ram introduction to mating was reduced in ewes given both fence-line and vasectomised ram contact (P < 0.001), leading to a more compact distribution of mating and lambing (At least P < 0.01). In the blood sampled VR ewes, there was a progressive decline in the number of days from ram exposure to the onset of dioestrus (at least P < 0.05). This observation indicates that the cycles in VR ewes became increasingly synchronised over the pre-mating period, a pattern not evident in VC ewes. In conclusion, repeated, short-term exposure of ewes to rams during the transition into the breeding season is an effective method of synchronising the distribution of mating during the breeding season.