DNA methylation in mammalian nuclei

A novel system to study the methylation of newly synthesized DNA in isolated nuclei was developed. Approximately 2.5% of cytosine residues incorporated into nascent DNA became methylated by endogenous methylase(s), and the level of DNA modification was reduced by methylation inhibitors. DNA synthesis and methylation were dependent on separate cytosol factors. The cytosol factor or factors required for DNA methylation were sensitive to trypsin digestion and were precipitable by (NH4)2SO4, suggesting that they were proteinaceous. Time-course experiments revealed a short lag of approximately 20 s between synthesis and methylation in nuclei. The DNAs produced in these nuclei were a mixed population of low molecular weight fragments and higher molecular weight fragments shown to be short extension of existing replicons. The methylation level found in low molecular weight DNA was lower than that found in bulk L1210 DNA, indicating that further methylation events might take place after ligation of small fragments. These data suggest that newly synthesized DNA is a good substrate for methylase enzymes and that nuclear cytoplasmic interactions may be important in controlling inheritance of methylation patterns.     

A concerted DNA methylation/histone methylation switch regulates rRNA gene dosage control and nucleolar dominance

Eukaryotes regulate the effective dosage of their ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, expressing fewer than half of the genes at any one time. Likewise, genetic hybrids displaying nucleolar dominance transcribe rRNA genes inherited from one parent but silence the other parental set. We show that rRNA gene dosage control and nucleolar dominance utilize a common mechanism. Central to the mechanism is an epigenetic switch in which concerted changes in promoter cytosine methylation density and specific histone modifications dictate the on and off states of the rRNA genes. A key component of the off switch is HDT1, a plant-specific histone deacetylase that localizes to the nucleolus and is required for H3 lysine 9 deacetylation and subsequent H3 lysine 9 methylation. Collectively, the data support a model in which cytosine methylation and histone deacetylation are each upstream of one another in a self-reinforcing repression cycle.     

哺乳动物DNA甲基化修饰的动态调控机制

DNA甲基化是最主要的表观遗传修饰之一,主要发生在胞嘧啶第五位碳原子上,称为5-甲基胞嘧啶。哺乳动物DNA甲基化由从头DNA甲基转移酶DNMT3A/3B在胚胎发育早期建立。细胞分裂过程中甲基化模式的维持由DNA甲基转移酶DNMT1实现。TET家族蛋白氧化5-甲基胞嘧啶成为5-羟甲基胞嘧啶、5-醛基胞嘧啶和5-羧基胞嘧啶,从而起始DNA的去甲基化过程。这些DNA甲基化修饰酶精确调节DNA甲基化的动态过程,在整个生命发育过程中发挥重要作用,其失调也与多种疾病发生密切相关。本文对近年来DNA甲基化修饰酶的结构与功能研究进行讨论。     

RNA interference in mammalian DNA methylation

RNAi and Dicer-dependent siRNAs are required for constitutive heterochromatin formation in fission yeast and for establishing DNA methylation at repetitive elements in plants. In the mammalian male germ line, DICER1-independent piRNAs are required for the full establishment of DNA methylation of dispersed repetitive transposable elements. However, in other mammalian cell types, no clear picture has yet emerged of the role of RNAi in establishing heterochromatin and DNA methylation. In mouse embryonic stem cells, which remain viable on loss of DICER1 and ablation of RNAi, while no firm evidence has been obtained for defective heterochromatin formation, there are indications of defective DNA methylation. The latter has been attributed to an indirect effect of reduced DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity due to a loss of miRNA-mediated gene regulation. However, it is unclear whether the reductions in DNMT activity were sufficient to affect DNA methylation. We consider it equally likely that the defects in DNA methylation that can be observed in DICER1-deficient embryonic stem cells are the result of nonspecific effects related to RNAi loss aside from reduced DNMT activity.     

DNA methylation at mammalian replication origins.

In Escherichia coli, DNA methylation regulates both origin usage and the time required to reassemble prereplication complexes at replication origins. In mammals, at least three replication origins are associated with a high density cluster of methylated CpG dinucleotides, and others whose methylation status has not yet been characterized have the potential to exhibit a similar DNA methylation pattern. One of these origins is found within the approximately 2-kilobase pair region upstream of the human c-myc gene that contains 86 CpGs. Application of the bisulfite method for detecting 5-methylcytosines at specific DNA sequences revealed that this region was not methylated in either total genomic DNA or newly synthesized DNA. Therefore, DNA methylation is not a universal component of mammalian replication origins. To determine whether or not DNA methylation plays a role in regulating the activity of origins that are methylated, the rate of remethylation and the effect of hypomethylation were determined at origin beta (ori-beta), downstream of the hamster DHFR gene. Remethylation at ori-beta did not begin until approximately 500 base pairs of DNA was synthesized, but it was then completed by the time that 4 kilobase pairs of DNA was synthesized (<3 min after release into S phase). Thus, DNA methylation cannot play a significant role in regulating reassembly of prereplication complexes in mammalian cells, as it does in E. coli. To determine whether or not DNA methylation plays any role in origin activity, hypomethylated hamster cells were examined for ori-beta activity. Cells that were >50% reduced in methylation at ori-beta no longer selectively activated ori-beta. Therefore, at some loci, DNA methylation either directly or indirectly determines where replication begins.     

DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease

Epigenetic modification of the cytosine base of DNA by its methylation introduced the possibility that beyond the inherent information contained within the nucleotide sequence there was an additional layer of information added to the underlying genetic code. DNA methylation has been implicated in a wide range of biological functions, including an essential developmental role in the reprogramming of germ cells and early embryos, the repression of endogenous retrotransposons, and a generalized role in gene expression. Special functions of DNA methylation include the marking of one of the parental alleles of many imprinted genes, a group of genes essential for growth and development in mammals with a unique parent-of-origin expression pattern, a role in stabilizing X-chromosome inactivation, and centromere function. In this regard, it is not surprising that errors in establishing or maintaining patterns of methylation are associated with a diverse group of human diseases and syndromes.     

DNA methylation dynamics during the mammalian life cycle

DNA methylation is dynamically remodelled during the mammalian life cycle through distinct phases of reprogramming and de novo methylation. These events enable the acquisition of cellular potential followed by the maintenance of lineage-restricted cell identity, respectively, a process that defines the life cycle through successive generations. DNA methylation contributes to the epigenetic regulation of many key developmental processes including genomic imprinting, X-inactivation, genome stability and gene regulation. Emerging sequencing technologies have led to recent insights into the dynamic distribution of DNA methylation during development and the role of this epigenetic mark within distinct genomic contexts, such as at promoters, exons or imprinted control regions. Additionally, there is a better understanding of the mechanistic basis of DNA demethylation during epigenetic reprogramming in primordial germ cells and during pre-implantation development. Here, we discuss our current understanding of the developmental roles and dynamics of this key epigenetic system.     

Gene silencing and endogenous DNA methylation in mammalian cells

It is known that transformed mammalian cells can spontaneously inactivate genes at low frequency by the de novo methylation of promoter sequences. It is usually assumed that this is due to DNA methyl transferase activity, but an alternative possibiity is that 5-methyldCTP is present in these cells and can be directly incorporated into DNA. The ongoing repair of DNA containing 5-methylcytosine will produce 5-methyldeoxycytidine monophosphate (5-methyldCMP), so the question arises whether this can be phosphorylated to 5-methyldCTP. We have tested this using three strains of CHO cells with different levels of 5-methyldCMP deaminase activity. That with the lowest enzyme activity, designated HAM⁻, has previously been shown to incorporate tritium labelled 5-methyldeoxycytidine into 5-methylcytosine in DNA, with a greater amount of label in thymine. This strain is phenotypically unstable producing cells resistant to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) at high frequency. In contrast, the strain with the highest 5-methyldCMP deaminease, designated HAM⁺, is extremely stable, and the starting strain K1 HAM^s1 is intermediate between the HAM⁻ and HAM⁺ phenotypes. We have also shown that human diploid fibroblast strain MRC-5 has a phenotype like HAM⁺, whereas its SV40 transformed derivative, MRC-5V2 resembles HAM⁻ in having low 5-methyl dCMP deaminase activity, and is phenotypically unstable with regard to 6-TG resistance. It seems that 5-methyldCMP deaminase can be down-regulated in transformed cells, and this can promote de novo methylation by incorporation of 5-methyldCTP derived from 5-methyldCMP.     

Epigenetics: differential DNA methylation in mammalian somatic tissues

Epigenetics refers to heritable phenotypic alterations in the absence of DNA sequence changes, and DNA methylation is one of the extensively studied epigenetic alterations. DNA methylation is an evolutionally conserved mechanism to regulate gene expression in mammals. Because DNA methylation is preserved during DNA replication it can be inherited. Thus, DNA methylation could be a major mechanism by which to produce semi-stable changes in gene expression in somatic tissues. Although it remains controversial whether germ-line DNA methylation in mammalian genomes is stably heritable, frequent tissue-specific and disease-specific de novo methylation events are observed during somatic cell development/differentiation. In this minireview, we discuss the use of restriction landmark genomic scanning, together with in silico analysis, to identify differentially methylated regions in the mammalian genome. We then present a rough overview of quantitative DNA methylation patterns at 4600 NotI sites and more than 150 differentially methylated regions in several C57BL/6J mouse tissues. Comparative analysis between mice and humans suggests that some, but not all, tissue-specific differentially methylated regions are conserved. A deeper understanding of cell-type-specific differences in DNA methylation might lead to a better illustration of the mechanisms behind tissue-specific differentiation in mammals.     

Retrotransposon silencing by DNA methylation can drive mammalian genomic imprinting

Among mammals, only eutherians and marsupials are viviparous and have genomic imprinting that leads to parent-of-origin-specific differential gene expression. We used comparative analysis to investigate the origin of genomic imprinting in mammals. PEG10 (paternally expressed 10) is a retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene that has an essential role for the formation of the placenta of the mouse. Here, we show that an orthologue of PEG10 exists in another therian mammal, the marsupial tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), but not in a prototherian mammal, the egg-laying platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), suggesting its close relationship to the origin of placentation in therian mammals. We have discovered a hitherto missing link of the imprinting mechanism between eutherians and marsupials because tammar PEG10 is the first example of a differentially methylated region (DMR) associated with genomic imprinting in marsupials. Surprisingly, the marsupial DMR was strictly limited to the 5′ region of PEG10, unlike the eutherian DMR, which covers the promoter regions of both PEG10 and the adjacent imprinted gene SGCE. These results not only demonstrate a common origin of the DMR-associated imprinting mechanism in therian mammals but provide the first demonstration that DMR-associated genomic imprinting in eutherians can originate from the repression of exogenous DNA sequences and/or retrotransposons by DNA methylation.     

Delayed DNA methylation is an integral feature of DNA replication in mammalian cells

In the majority of sites of methylation in the DNA of mammalian cells, the symmetry of methylation is restored within a few minutes of the passage of a replication fork. However, it has been shown that daughter strand methylation in immortalised cell lines is delayed in a substantial minority of sites for up to several hours after replication. We report here the results of two new approaches to the determination of the functional significance of delayed DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Firstly, we demonstrate that normal, nontransformed cells (human peripheral lymphocytes in short-term primary culture) have comparable proportions of delayed DNA methylation to many immortalised cell lines, showing that delayed DNA methylation is not just a secondary consequence of abnormally high methionine requirements commonly observed in transformed cells and that delayed DNA methylation would be unlikely not to occur in vivo. Secondly, we have used 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5azadCyd) to derive subclones of cells from the Chinese hamster ovary cell line which have stably hypomethylated DNA. In three of these subclones which had lost on average one fourth of the methylation sites from their genomes, the proportion of daughter strand methylation which was delayed after replication was reduced by less than 10%. If delayed DNA methylation were site-specific, this implies that of the order of twice the number of "immediate" methylation sites than delayed methylation sites had been lost from the genomes of these hypomethylated subclones. Thus, delayed DNA methylation is an integral part of the process whereby replicating mammalian cells maintain the pattern of methylation in their genomes. These observations are discussed in relation to the significance of delayed DNA methylation for the accurate maintenance of methylation patterns in the genome and the consequent implications for the possible role of methylated deoxycytidines in mammalian gene control.     

Bacterial DNA methylation and gene transfer efficiency

The necessary amplification step in bacteria of any plasmid currently used in DNA immunization or gene therapy introduces modification in the nucleotide sequence of plasmid DNA used in gene transfer. These changes affect the adenine and the internal cytosine in respectively all of the GATC and CC(A/T)GG sequences. These modifications which introduce 6-methyladenine and 5-methylcytosine in plasmidic DNA are the consequence of the existence of the bacterial modification systems Dam and Dcm. In eucaryotes, the presence of 5-methylcytosine at dinucleotides -CG- is involved in silencing gene expression, but the possible consequences of the presence of the bacterial G(m)ATC and C(m)C(A/T)GG sequences in the plasmids used in gene transfer experiments are presently unknown. Since the possibility exists to obtain plasmid DNA lacking this specific bacterial pattern of methylation by using (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria we performed experiments to compare in vitro and in vivo gene transfer efficiency of a pCMV-luc reporter plasmid amplified either in the JM109 (dam(+), dcm(+)) or JM110 (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria. Data obtained demonstrated that the presence of 6-methyladenine in GATC sequences and 5-methylcytosine in the second C of CC(A/T)GG motifs does not reduce the levels of luciferase activity detected following in vitro or in vivo gene transfer. On the contrary, gene transfer with a pCMV-luc amplified in JM109 (dam(+), dcm(+)) bacteria gives greater amounts of luciferase than the same transfection performed with a plasmid amplified in the mutated JM110 (dam(-), dcm(-)) counterpart. Therefore, these data do not suggest that the use of (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria to amplify plasmid DNA may increase gene transfer efficiency. However, the persistence of the use of (dam(+), dcm(+)) bacteria in order to amplify plasmid DNA raises the question of the possible biological consequences of the introduction of the bacterial G(m)ATC and C(m)C(A/T)GG sequences in eukaryotic cells or organisms.     

Silencing of transgene expression in mammalian cells by DNA methylation and histone modifications in gene therapy perspective

DNA methylation and histone modifications are vital in maintaining genomic stability and modulating cellular functions in mammalian cells. These two epigenetic modifications are the most common gene regulatory systems known to spatially control gene expression. Transgene silencing by these two mechanisms is a major challenge to achieving effective gene therapy for many genetic conditions. The implications of transgene silencing caused by epigenetic modifications have been extensively studied and reported in numerous gene delivery studies. This review highlights instances of transgene silencing by DNA methylation and histone modification with specific focus on the role of these two epigenetic effects on the repression of transgene expression in mammalian cells from integrative and non-integrative based gene delivery systems in the context of gene therapy. It also discusses the prospects of achieving an effective and sustained transgene expression for future gene therapy applications.