Do endogenous opioid peptides mediate the effects of photoperiod on release of luteinizing hormone and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes?

Three experiments were done to determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) mediate the effects of photoperiod on release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (Prl) in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes. Intravenous infusions of 0.5 naloxone X h-1 X kg body weight-1 for 3.5 h increased (P less than 0.01) mean plasma concentrations of LH and decreased (P less than 0.025) mean interpulse interval (period) of LH pulses in OVX ewes exposed to long day lengths (16L:8D). Infusions of either 1.0 or 2.5 mg morphine-SO4 X h-1 X kg-1 for 3 h increased (P less than 0.005) the period of LH pulses and increased (P less than 0.005) concentrations of Prl in OVX ewes during the breeding season. In OVX ewes exposed to long (16L:8D) or short (8L:16D) day lengths infusions of naloxone increased (P less than 0.05) mean concentrations of LH, whereas morphine decreased (P less than 0.01) mean concentrations of LH. These effects were attributed to changes in period of LH pulses (P less than 0.001). The drug X photoperiod interactions were not significant for LH parameters. Naloxone did not affect Prl release in either long- or short-day groups, but morphine increased (P less than 0.001) Prl release during long and short day lengths. The effect of morphine on Prl release was more pronounced in ewes exposed to long day lengths than in those exposed to short day lengths. In conclusion, EOPs inhibit the LH pulse generator in OVX ewes. However, it is doubtful that the EOPs mediate the steroid-independent effects of photoperiod on LH release. The results also suggest that photoperiod may influence Prl release via opiate neurons.     

Circannual cycles of luteinizing hormone and prolactin secretion in ewes during prolonged exposure to a fixed photoperiod: evidence for an endogenous reproductive rhythm

Circulating patterns of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL) were monitored for 5 yr in ewes maintained either outdoors in natural conditions or indoors in a fixed, short photoperiod (8L:16D). The ewes were ovariectomized and each was treated with a Silastic implant containing estradiol to provide a fixed negative feedback signal to the reproductive neuroendocrine axis. Serum concentrations of LH and PRL were subjected to a statistical algorithm developed for the purpose of detecting hormone cycles. In ewes maintained outdoors, serum concentrations of both hormones underwent high amplitude cycles with a period no different from 365 days. Among ewes maintained in the fixed photoperiod, unambiguous cycles of LH and PRL persisted through the 5 yr of exposure to short days. Period of these cycles differed from 365 days. Further, the LH cycles became desynchronized among ewes housed together and desynchronized with respect to the LH cycles in ewes kept outdoors. These findings document the existence of an endogenous circannual rhythm of reproductive neuroendocrine function in ewes.     

Effects of breed, ovarian steroids and season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

The effects of season and of oestradiol and progesterone on the tonic secretion of LH were studied in ovariectomized Merino and Suffolk ewes, two breeds which differ markedly in the seasonal pattern of their reproductive activity. In the absence of exogenous steroids, the frequency of LH pulses was lower and the amplitude of the pulses was higher in anoestrus than in the breeding season for Merino and Suffolk ewes 30 days after ovariectomy. In long-term (190 days) ovariectomized ewes, this seasonal change in LH secretion was observed in Suffolk ewes only. During seasonal anoestrus, treatment of ewes with subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants (3, 6 or 12 mm in length) decreased the frequency of LH pulses in a dose-dependent manner, with Suffolk ewes being far more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of oestradiol than Merino ewes. The lowest dose of oestradiol (3 mm) had no effect on the secretion of LH in Merino ewes, but reduced secretion in Suffolk ewes. Treatment of ewes with the highest dose of oestradiol (12 mm) completely abolished LH pulses in Suffolk ewes, whereas infrequent pulses remained evident in Merino ewes. During the breeding season, oestradiol alone had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH in either breed, but in combination with progesterone there was a significant reduction in LH pulse frequency. Progesterone effectively decreased LH secretion in both breeds in both seasons. It was concluded that differences between breeds in the 'depth' of anoestrus could be related to differences in the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to both negative feedback by oestradiol and the direct effects of photoperiod.     

Control of gonadotrophin release in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace ewes during seasonal anoestrus

The patterns of LH and FSH secretion were measured in 4 experimental groups of Finnish Landrace and Scottish Blackface ewes: long-term (18 months) ovariectomized ewes (Group 1), long-term ovariectomized ewes with an oestradiol implant, which has been shown to produce peripheral levels of approximately 5 pg/ml (Group 2), long-term ovariectomized ewes with an oestradiol implant for 18 months which was subsequently removed (surgery on Day 0) (Group 3) and short-term ovariectomized ewes (surgery on Day 0) (Group 4). LH and FSH concentrations were monitored in all groups at approximately weekly intervals, before and after Day 0. Finnish Landrace ewes in Groups 1, 2 and 3 had significantly higher mean FSH concentrations than did Scottish Blackface ewes (P less than 0.01). FSH and LH concentrations increased significantly in Groups 3 and 4, but values in Group 4 were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) than those in Group 1 ewes even up to 30 days after ovariectomy. In Group 3, LH concentrations increased to levels similar to those in Group 1. The pattern of LH release was, however, significantly different, with a lower LH pulse frequency (P less than 0.05), but higher pulse amplitude (P less than 0.05). This difference was maintained at least until 28 days after implant removal. We suggest that removal of negative feedback by ovariectomy demonstrates an underlying breed difference in the pattern of FSH secretion and that ovarian factors other than oestradiol are also involved in the negative-feedback control of hypothalamic/pituitary gland function. Furthermore, negative-feedback effects can be maintained for long periods, at least 28 days, after ovariectomy or oestradiol implant removal.     

Evidence that the onset of the breeding season in the ewe may be independent of decreasing plasma prolactin concentrations

Ten ewes of each of two breeds, Dorset Horn (long breeding season) and Welsh Mountain (short breeding season), were given subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants and then ovariectomized. Another 10 ewes of each breed were left intact. On 3 May 1982, all the ewes were housed in an artificial photoperiod of 16L:8D. After 4 weeks, half of the ewes of each breed and physiological state were abruptly exposed to a short-day (8L:16D) photoperiod while the others remained in long days (16L:8D). The time of onset of the breeding season was significantly (P less than 0.05) advanced in ewes switched to short days (12 August +/- 10 days) compared to those maintained in long days (4 September +/- 14 days). Dorset Horn ewes began to cycle (20 July +/- 7 days) significantly (P less than 0.001) earlier than Welsh Mountain ewes (19 September +/- 6 days). Disparities in the time of onset of cyclic activity in ewes of different breeds and daylength groups were echoed in disparities in the time at which plasma LH and FSH concentrations rose in oestrogen-implanted, ovariectomized ewes of the same light treatment group. Prolactin concentrations showed an immediate decrease in ewes switched to short days, but remained elevated in long-day ewes. Since the breeding season started in the presence of high prolactin concentrations in long-day ewes, it seems unlikely that prolactin is an important factor determining the timing of the onset of cyclic activity.     

Effect of the introduction of rams during the anoestrous season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

Introduction of rams to ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants (N = 10) increased the frequency of LH pulses from 4 X 8 to 10 X 6 pulses per 12 h. This effect was reflected by increases in mean levels of LH and the basal levels upon which the pulses were superimposed. In ewes that had not been treated with oestradiol (N = 5), there was no significant increase in pulse frequency but mean and basal levels of LH increased slightly after the introduction of rams. In a second experiment, similar effects of the introduction of rams were seen in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol or oestradiol + androstenedione (N = 16), but no significant effects of the rams were observed in untreated ewes (N = 8) or ewes treated only with androstenedione (N = 7). No preovulatory surges of LH were observed in the 30-h period after the introduction of rams. It was concluded that the ram stimulus probably evokes the increase in pulse frequency by inhibiting the negative feedback action of oestradiol, and that the surge normally observed in entire ewes is dependent on the ovarian response to these pulses. However, the observation of responses in some ewes not treated with oestradiol also raises the possibility that the ram stimulus can act directly on the hypothalamic neurones that control the secretion of LH, and that this effect is enhanced in the presence of oestrogen.     

Use of controlled photoperiod to induce out-of-season breeding in ewes

Between June 1 and August 24 of two successive summers, Targhee ewes (n = 64) and Finn x Targhee ewes (n = 44) were subjected to different photoperiods. Treatments were natural day length (ND), eight hours light: 16 hours of dark (8L:16D), 16L:8D shifted to 8L:16D (16L:8D-8L:16D) and seven hours of light:nine hours of dark:one hour of light:seven hours dark (7L:9D:1L:7D). Days to the mean first breeding mark were shortest (P<0.05) for the 16L:8D-8L:16D group (32 days) followed by the 7L:9D:1L:7D group (39 days). The longest mean intervals to marking were 52 (ND) and 47 days (8L:16D). Time to mean first breeding mark was 18 days shorter (P<0.05) in 1981 than in 1982. Mean serum progesterone values were 0.05) among treatments through week 6. The 8L:16D group had the most rapid rise and the highest terminal progesterone value, while the ND group had the slowest rise and lowest terminal value. Mean serum prolactin values in general started high and decreased over time. This decrease in all treatments preceded the rapid rise in progesterone. The most rapid prolactin decline was for the 8L:16D group. The percentage of exposed ewes lambing was lowest (P<0.05) for ND ewes (37%) and highest for 8L:16D ewes (81%). The shortest mean interval from the start of treatment to lambing was 210 days (7L:9D:1L:7D) followed by 214 days (8L:16D), 217 days (ND) and 218 days (16L:8D-8L:16D). Considering percentage lambing in combination with interval to lambing, the 8L:16D treatment was the most effective treatment.     

Effects of oestradiol on LH, FSH and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the rate (dose/time) at which oestradiol-17 beta (oestradiol) is presented to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis influences secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin. A computer-controlled infusion system was used to produce linearly increasing serum concentrations of oestradiol in ovariectomized ewes over a period of 60 h. Serum samples were collected from ewes every 2 h from 8 h before to 92 h after start of infusion, and assayed for oestradiol, LH, FSH and prolactin. Rates of oestradiol increase were categorized into high (0.61-1.78 pg/h), medium (0.13-0.60 pg/h) and low (0.01-0.12 pg/h). Ewes receiving high rates of oestradiol (N = 11) responded with a surge of LH 12.7 +/- 2.0 h after oestradiol began to increase, whereas ewes receiving medium (N = 15) and low (N = 11) rates of oestradiol responded with a surge of LH at 19.4 +/- 1.7 and 30.9 +/- 2.0 h, respectively. None of the surges of LH was accompanied by a surge of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH decreased and prolactin increased in ewes receiving high and medium rates of oestradiol, when compared to saline-infused ewes (N = 8; P less than 0.05). We conclude that rate of increase in serum concentrations of oestradiol controls the time of the surge of LH and secretion of prolactin and FSH in ovariectomized ewes. We also suggest that the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of LH may be different from the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of FSH.     

Effect of photoperiod on LH, FSH, prolactin and melatonin patterns in ovariectomized prepubertal heifers

Angus and Angus crossbred prepubertal heifers were ovariectomized and randomly assigned to either increasing light simulating the photoperiod of the vernal equinox to the summer solstice (I) or decreasing light simulating the photoperiod of the autumnal equinox to the winter solstice (D) for 43 degrees N latitude. Three blood samples were taken each week for 14 weeks, the first at 11:00 h and two others 2 days later, 1 h before lights on (dark), 1 h before lights off (light). At the end of 14 weeks 4 heifers from each treatment group were cannulated and samples were taken for 12 h at 15-min intervals, 6 h in the light and 6 h in the dark. All sera were assayed for LH, FSH and prolactin. In addition, the samples taken at 15-min intervals were assayed for melatonin. In samples taken weekly at 11:00 h circulating concentrations of LH and prolactin were higher among animals in Group I, while FSH concentrations were not different between Groups D and I. In samples collected weekly in the light or the dark, LH and prolactin concentrations were higher in Group I animals. However, prolactin concentrations were higher and LH concentrations tended to be higher in samples taken in the dark. FSH concentrations were not different between either D or I or dark and light. In samples taken at 15-min intervals the prolactin baseline was higher and pulse amplitude tended to be higher for Group I animals. Neither LH nor FSH pulse characteristics differed between I and D; however, LH baseline and LH pulse amplitude were higher in the dark. Melatonin pulse amplitude was higher among animals in Group D and higher in serum collected in the dark. These results suggest that photoperiod alters circulating concentrations of LH and prolactin and alters pulsatile release of LH, prolactin and melatonin in the prepubertal heifer.     

How the FSH/LH ratio and dose numbers in the p-FSH administration treatment regimen, and insemination schedule affect superovulatory response in ewes

We wished to evaluate the effects of FSH/LH ratio and number of doses of p-FSH during a superovulatory treatment on ovulation rate and embryo production (Experiment I). In Experiment II, we studied the efficacy of fertilization after various insemination schedules in superovulated donors. In Experiment I estrus was synchronized in 40 ewes (FGA, for 9 days plus PGF2alpha on Day 7) and the ewes were randomly assigned to four treatment groups as follows (n = 10 ewes each): Group A: four p-FSH doses with the FSH/LH ratio held constant (1.6); Group B: four p-FSH doses with the FSH/LH ratio decreasing (FSH/LH 1.6-1.0-0.6-0.3); Group C: eight p-FSH doses with the FSH/LH ratio held constant (1.6); Group D: eight p-FSH doses and FSH/LH ratio decreasing (1.6-1.6, 1.0-1.0, 0.6-0.6, 0.3-0.3). p-FSH administrations were performed twice daily 12 h apart. The ewes were mated at the onset of estrus and again after 12 and 24 h; then, one ram per four ewes was maintained with the ewes for two additional days. Ovarian response and embryo production were assessed on Day 7 after estrus. Experiment II. Three groups (n = 10 each) of superovulated ewes were inseminated as follows: Group M: mated at onset of estrus; Group AI: artificial insemination 30 h after onset of estrus; M + AI) mating at onset of estrus and intrauterine AI performed 30 h from estrus with fresh semen. Results of Experiment I showed that treatment (D) improved (P < 0.05) ovulatory response in comparison to Groups (C) and (A). The fertilization rate was lower (P < 0.01) in Group D) than Group (A). Also the proportion of transferable embryos was lower in Group (D) in comparison to all the other treatments (P < 0.01). Group A gave the best production of embryos (7.3/ewe; 89.0% transferable). In Experiment II, combined mating plus AI improved fertilization rate (80.3%) compared to both mating (P < 0.01) and AI (P < 0.02) alone.     

Steroid secretion rates and plasma binding activity in androstenedione-immune ewes with an autotransplanted ovary

Mature Merino ewes in which the left ovary and its vascular pedicle had been autotransplanted to the neck were divided into control (N = 5) and immunized groups (N = 6). The immunized ewes were treated (2 ml s.c.) with Fecundin 1 and 4 weeks before the start of blood sampling. Ovarian and jugular venous blood was collected every 10 min at two stages of the follicular phase (21-27 h and 38-42 h after i.m. injection of 125 micrograms of a prostaglandin (PG) analogue) and during the mid-luteal phase (8 h at 15-min intervals). The ewes were monitored regularly for luteal function and preovulatory LH surges. Hormone concentrations and anti-androstenedione titres were assayed by RIA and ovarian secretion rates of oestradiol-17 beta, progesterone and androstenedione were determined. After the booster immunization, progesterone increased simultaneously with titre in immunized ewes, reaching 30 ng/ml at the time of PG injection when median titre was 1:10,000. All ewes responded to PG with LH surges 42-72 h later: 2 of the immunized ewes then had a second LH surge within 3-4 days at a time when peripheral progesterone values were 2-3 ng/ml. The frequency of steroid and LH pulses was greater in immunized ewes (P less than 0.05) during the luteal phase but not the follicular phase. The secretion rate of androstenedione was 6-10 times greater (19-37 ng/min; P less than 0.001) in immunized ewes at all sampling stages. Progesterone secretion rates were 3 times greater (16 micrograms/min; P less than 0.001) during the luteal phase in immunized ewes. The amplitude of oestradiol pulses was significantly reduced in immunized ewes (4.8 vs 2.1 ng/min at +24 h and 6.5 vs 2.8 ng/min at +40 h in control and immunized ewes, respectively: P less than 0.05) during the follicular phase. However, the mean secretion rate of oestradiol at each phase of the cycle was not significantly different between treatment groups. Analysis of bound and free steroid using polyethylene glycol showed that greater than 98% of peripheral and ovarian venous androstenedione and 86% of peripheral progesterone was bound in immunized ewes but there was no appreciable binding (less than 0.1%) in control ewes. Similarly, 50% of ovarian venous oestradiol was bound in immunized ewes compared to 15% in control ewes. We conclude that immunization against androstenedione increases the secretion rate of androstenedione and progesterone but not of oestradiol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Twenty-four-hour profiles of prolactin and testosterone in ram lambs exposed to skeleton photoperiods consisting of various light pulses

Individual groups of 6 ram lambs were housed within a controlled environment and exposed to one of 6 photoperiod schedules. Groups I and II received 8 (short day) or 16 (long day) h of continuous light, respectively; Groups III, IV and V were exposed to asymmetrical skeleton photoperiods consisting of a main light period of 7 h followed 9 h later by a light pulse of 1 h, 15 min or 1 min duration, respectively, and Group VI was exposed to a symmetrical skeleton photoperiod consisting of two 1-h light pulses positioned 16 h apart. After 4 weeks of treatment serum concentrations of prolactin and testosterone were measured over 24 h. Long-day responses characteristic of the 16L:8D photoperiod (i.e. elevated prolactin and reduced testosterone) were obtained in each of the asymmetric light-pulse treatment groups, but whereas prolactin was elevated over the full 24 h in lambs exposed to 16L:8D, two prominent nocturnal prolactin releases were largely responsible for the high 24-h mean prolactin values in Groups III, IV and V. Reduced serum testosterone in these same groups could not be attributed to a diurnal pattern of secretion but was associated with an overall decrease in testosterone pulse frequency. Prolactin and testosterone levels in Group IV were intermediate between those observed in lambs exposed to 8 or 16 h of light. In summary, light pulses of short duration (1 min) positioned at 17 h after dawn can produce endocrine changes in lambs similar to those observed in lambs exposed to 16 h of continuous light.     

Photoperiodic history and a changing melatonin pattern can determine the neuroendocrine response of the ewe to daylength

The reproductive neuroendocrine response of Suffolk ewes to the direction of daylength change was determined in animals which were ovariectomized and treated with constant release capsules of oestradiol. Two groups of animals were initially exposed to 16 or 10 h light/day for 74 days. On day zero of the study, when one group of ewes was reproductively stimulated (elevated LH concentrations) and the other reproductively inhibited (undetectable LH concentrations), half the animals from each group were transferred to an intermediate daylength of 13 h light/day. The remaining ewes were maintained on their respective solstice photoperiods to control for photorefractoriness. LH concentrations rose in animals experiencing a 3 h decrease in daylength from 16L:8D to 13L:11D while LH concentrations fell to undetectable values in those that experienced a 3 h increase in daylength from 10L:14D to 13L:11D. The photoperiodic response of the Suffolk ewe, therefore, depends on her daylength history. Such a result could be explained if the 24-h secretory pattern of melatonin secretion, known to transduce photoperiodic information to the reproductive axis, was influenced by the direction of change of daylength. Hourly samples for melatonin were collected for 24 h 17 days before and three times after transfer to 13L:11D. The melatonin secretory profile always conformed to daylength. Therefore, the mechanism by which the same photoperiod can produce opposite neuroendocrine responses must lie downstream from the pineal gland in the processing of the melatonin signal.     

Role of photorefractoriness in onset of anoestrus in Rambouillet x Dorset ewes

An experiment was conducted to determine the extent to which refractoriness to short daylength is involved in the onset of anoestrus in Rambouillet x Dorset ewes. Ovary-intact ewes (N = 36) were exposed to ambient photoperiod (C) or to a photoperiod equal to the winter solstice (S) beginning on 21 December 1986 and continuing until 21 April 1987. Samples of serum were obtained at weekly intervals and assayed for progesterone to assess ovarian activity, and for prolactin to assess response to photoperiod treatment. In addition, ovariectomized (ovx) ewes with implants containing oestradiol were housed with C(Covx) and S (Sovx) ewes (N = 4 per treatment). The concentration of LH was determined in serum collected biweekly from all ovariectomized ewes throughout the treatment period as an index of reproductive status. Time-trends for concentrations of LH differed (P less than 0.005) for ewes in Groups Covx and Sovx with LH decreasing on the order of about 8-fold in Group Covx through the treatment period, while not changing appreciably in Group Sovx. Intact ewes in both treatments began to become anoestrous by the 9th week of treatment (about the last week in February). However, fewer Group S than Group C ewes were anoestrous at 13 and 14 weeks of treatment (P = 0.09). Time-trends for concentrations of prolactin also differed for the Group C and S ewes (P less than 0.005), probably reflecting the divergence in duration of photoperiod between the two treatments by the end of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of transport on pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized ewes with or without prior steroid exposure at different times of year

The initial aim of the present study was to test whether the stress of transport suppresses LH pulsatile secretion in ewes. In a pilot experiment in the late breeding season, transport resulted in an unexpected response in three out of five transported, ovariectomized ewes pretreated with oestradiol and progesterone. Before transport, seasonal suppression of LH pulses had occurred earlier than anticipated, but LH pulsatility suddenly restarted for the period of transport. This finding was reminiscent of unexplained results obtained in ovariectomized ewes infused centrally with high doses of corticotrophin-releasing hormone after pretreatment with low doses of oestradiol with or without progesterone. Hence, an additional aim of the present study was to examine whether these latter results with corticotrophin-releasing hormone could be reproduced by increasing endogenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone secretion by transport. Subsequent experiments used groups of at least eight ovariectomized ewes at different times of the year with or without prior exposure to steroids to assess whether these unexpected observations were associated with season or the prevailing endocrine milieu. In the mid-breeding season, transport for 4 h in the absence of steroid pretreatment for 8 months reduced LH pulse frequency from 7.5 +/- 0.3 to 6.3 +/- 0.4 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) and LH pulse amplitude from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the mid-breeding season, 34 h after the cessation of pretreatment with oestradiol and progesterone, transport suppressed LH pulse frequency from 6.1 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.3 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) with a tendency of effect on amplitude (6.2 +/- 2.7 to 2.61 +/- 0.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.07; note the large variance in the pretransport data). During mid-anoestrus, evidence of a suppressive effect of transport was only observed on LH pulse amplitude (4.7 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 pulses per 4 h; P < 0.05) in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to ovarian steroids for 4 months. Repetition of the pilot experiment with 12 ewes during the transition into anoestrus resulted in one ewe with LH pulses seasonally suppressed but increased by transport; 11 ewes had a distinct pulsatile LH pattern which was decreased by transport in six ewes. In anoestrus, there was no effect of transport on LH pulse frequency or amplitude in intact ewes, or those ovariectomized 2-3 weeks previously, with or without prior oestradiol and progesterone treatment. However, basal concentrations of cortisol were greater in anoestrus than in the breeding season, and the increment in cortisol during transport was similar in anoestrus and the breeding season but greater during the transition into anoestrus (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.31 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1 before transport to 0.48 +/- 0.05 ng ml-1 during the second hour of transport (P < 0.05). In conclusion, transport reduced LH pulse frequency and amplitude in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to exogenous steroids for at least 4 months. In most animals, the previously observed increase in LH pulsatility induced by exogenous CRH was not reproduced by increasing endogenous CRH secretion by transport. However, in four ewes, transport did increase LH pulsatility, but only during the transition into anoestrus in ewes with seasonally suppressed LH profiles after withdrawal of steroid pretreatment.     

Effects of hormonal manipulation on the resumption of postpartum reproductive activity in Texel ewes

Three experiments were conducted on Texel ewes to study the influence of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)), prolactin (PRL), estradiol (E(2)), and gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) on postpartum reproductive activity. In Experiment 1, oral administration of indomethacin (25 to 50 mg/day/ewe) from Day 3 post partum to the first detected estrus inhibited plasma 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto, PGF(2alpha) (PGFM) concentrations (P < 0.0001). This treatment resulted in an earlier rise in the frequency and amplitude of luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses and a resumption of estrous behavior (P < 0.05), while ovarian activity estimated by progesterone (P(4)) concentrations resumed to the same extent in treated ewes and controls. Bromocriptine treatment (2.5 mg/day/ewe) reduced plasma PRL levels (P < 0.0001) but had no effect on ovarian activity as evidenced by P(4) and resumption of estrus or on either the frequency or amplitude of the LH pulse. In Experiment 2, a single injection of GnRH agonist (42 mcg of buserelin/ewe) on Day 16 post partum resulted in an abrupt elevation of plasma LH concentrations; mean LH values were 18 to 27 times higher when compared with those of the control ewes. Two days after this treatment, ovulations occurred in 5 of the treated ewes and in 2 of the control ewes. This induced ovarian activity was not associated with estrous behavior; however, after an adequate subsequent luteal phase all the treated ewes displayed estrus, the resumption of estrus thus being earlier in treated than in control ewes (P < 0.01). In Experiment 3, E(2) supplementation from Day 16 to Day 28 post partum increased the number of LH pulses per 6 hours in suckling ewes (P < 0.05) and induced earlier resumption of estrus in dry ewes but not in suckling ewes (P < 0.01). Luteal function was detected about 5 and 8 days after the insertion of E(2) implants in 4 dry ewes and in 2 suckling ewes, respectively.     

Photoperiodic modification of negative and positive feedback effects of oestradiol on LH secretion in ovariectomized goats

Ovariectomized Shiba goats carrying an oestradiol implant (4-10 pg/ml) were kept under a short-day light regimen (10L:14D; Group 1, N = 4) or a long-day regimen (16L:8D; Group 2, N = 4). Plasma LH concentrations were lower (P less than 0.05) in Group 2 than in Group 1 between Days 40 and 200, suggesting an enhanced negative feedback effect of oestradiol on LH secretion under a long-day regimen. On Days 30, 60, 100, 149 and 279, an LH surge was induced by i.v. infusion of oestradiol for 48 h; the infusion rate was gradually increased from 0.5 (0 h) to 4.1 (48 h) micrograms/h, thereby mimicking the preovulatory increase of oestradiol secretion. The duration and magnitude of the induced LH surge were indistinguishable between the groups. The latency from the onset of oestradiol infusion to the LH surge was relatively constant in Group 1, 41.1 +/- 0.9 h (mean +/- s.e.m., n = 17) but was shorter in Group 2 (19.7 +/- 3.7 h, P less than 0.05) on Day 149; less oestradiol was therefore required for induction of the LH surge (27.4 vs 89.7 micrograms, P less than 0.01), suggesting an increased sensitivity to the oestradiol positive feedback under a long-day regimen. These results might be interpreted to indicate that the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the goat becomes hypersensitive to the positive as well as the negative feedback effect of oestradiol under long-day conditions.     

Different neuroendocrine systems modulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in photosuppressed and photorefractory ewes.

The objective of this study was to determine whether two photoperiod regimens that induce anestrus in the ewe-short-day photorefractoriness (SDPR) and long-day photosuppression (LDPS)--act by different neuronal mechanisms. In separate experiments, ovary-intact (INTACT), ovariectomized (OVX), and ovariectomized estradiol-treated (OVX + E) ewes were subjected to three different photoperiodic regimens that resulted in reproductive quiescence: (1) exposure to long days (16L:8D), which caused photosuppression (INTACT, n = 9; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5; (2) prolonged exposure to short days (10L:14D)), which caused photorefractoriness (INTACT, n = 10; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5); (3) exposure to natural photoperiod, which induced seasonal anestrus (INTACT, n = 11; OVX, n = 6; OVX + E, n = 5). Effect of photoregimen was monitored by measuring progesterone or LH. Drug challenges were made after two sequential estrous cycles were missed in INTACT ewes, after mean LH concentrations dropped below 1 ng/ml in OVX + E ewes, and after LH interpulse intervals increased in OVX ewes. Effects of drug on LH pulse pattern were determined by taking blood samples at 12-min intervals for 8 h after i.v. diluent injection; then for 8 h after i.v. injection of cyproheptadine, a serotonin antagonist (3 mg/kg); and again 7 days later after i.v. injection of diluent or pimozide, a dopamine antagonist (0.25 mg/kg). Cyproheptadine had little effect except to decrease (p = 0.05) mean LH in INTACT anestrous ewes and decrease (p less than 0.01) pulse amplitude in OVX + E SDPR ewes. Pimozide did not affect LH pulse frequency in LDPS ewes. However, pimozide increased LH pulse frequency (p less than 0.005) and mean concentrations (p less than 0.005) in SDPR OVX + E ewes, whereas it suppressed LH pulse frequency (p less than 0.05) and amplitude (p less than 0.03) in SDPR INTACT and SDPR OVX ewes. The results suggest that (1) the role of the dopaminergic system differs in SDPR and LDPS ewes, and that different neuronal systems may effect SDPR and LDPS, (2) the effect of pimozide in SDPR ewes is altered by ovarian steroids, and (3) the serotonergic system has relatively little role in regulating pulsatile LH secretion in any of the three different states of anestrus.     

Ovarian steroid involvement in endogenous opioid modulation of LH secretion in seasonally anoestrous mature ewes

In June, 16 mature ewes were ovariectomized and allocated to four groups: 1, saline; 2, naloxone; 3, progesterone implant plus naloxone; 4, oestrogen implant plus naloxone. Steroids were implanted at the time of ovariectomy. At 5 days after ovariectomy, the animals were intravenously infused with saline for 8 h and naloxone (50 mg/h) in saline for 8 h the following day. Three intact ewes were given naloxone in a similar way. During infusions and for 8 h on the day after naloxone, jugular venous blood samples were taken every 15 min and assayed for LH. Naloxone resulted in significant increases in mean LH concentration (P less than 0.01), LH episode frequency and episode height (P less than 0.05) in Group 3 ewes, but was without effect in any other group. These results provide evidence that the progesterone status of the ewe affects its response to naloxone, that progesterone negative feedback on LH release may be mediated by an opioid system, and that increased oestradiol negative feedback during seasonal anoestrus is unlikely to work via increased opioid inhibition of LH.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol after administration of a GnRH agonist in the ovariectomized ewe

Administration of a GnRH agonist (5 micrograms) every 12 h to long-term ovariectomized ewes for 5 or 10 days during the breeding season suppressed mean LH levels from around 6 to 1 ng/ml on Days 1 and 4 after treatment; on Day 1 after treatment LH pulse frequency and amplitude were lower than pretreatment values. On Day 4 after treatment LH pulse frequency was restored to pretreatment levels (1 per h) whereas LH pulse amplitude had only slightly increased from 0.5 to 1 ng/ml, a value 25% of that before treatment. This increase in amplitude was greater the shorter the duration of treatment. Ovariectomized ewes treated with the agonist for 5 days exhibited both negative and positive feedback actions after implantation of a capsule containing oestradiol; however, compared to control ewes treated with oestradiol only, the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol were blunted. These results suggest that the recovery of tonic LH concentrations after GnRH agonist-induced suppression is limited primarily by changes in LH pulse amplitude. The results also demonstrate that the feedback actions of oestradiol are attenuated, but not blocked, by GnRH agonist treatment.