Pathways of carbon cycling in the euphotic zone: the fate of largesized phytoplankton in the Northeast Water Polynya

The fate of large-sized phytoplankton and pathways of carboncycling in surface waters, i.e. recycling within or export outof the euphotic zone, were investigated in the Northeast Water(NEW) Polynya (77–81N) from 23 May to 17 August 1993.Sampling represented a wide range of ice, hydrographic and nutrientconditions. Phytoplankton and zooplankton abundances, and phytoplanktonproduction rates were determined in the field, whereas potentialrates of grazing by copepods, dino flagellates and appendicularianswere calculated from abundances and temperature, using assumptionsfrom the literature. The potential downward and lateral exportof phytoplankton was also calculated by resolving a carbon budgetfor the euphotic zone. The present study suggests that, in theNEW, different pathways for the cycling of carbon existed inseasonally ice-free (in the polynya) and continuously ice-coveredareas (outside the polynya). Outside the polynya, the fate oflarge-sized phytoplankton could not be assessed because theheterotrophic community presumably grazed on a variety of fooditems, including ice algae, microzooplankton and large-sizedphytoplankton. In the polynya, the fate of large-sized phytoplanktonproduction was to be mostly recycled at the beginning of samplingand to be mostly exported downward or laterally as the bloomof large-sized phyto plankton developed. Generally, copepodsmostly contributed to recycling, but sometimes dinoflagellatesor appendicularians alone recycled most of the large-sized phytoplanktonproduction.     

Zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in a eutrophic lake

Enclosure experiments were made in a cyanobacteria dominatedlake (Lake Rotongaio) to assess the impact of zooplankton (>150µm) grazing on algal growth rates and determine the effectof diel and vertical changes in zooplankton grazing intensityand nutrient (NH₄-N) regeneration upon abundance of phytoplankton.The filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena minutissima var. attenuataand diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana showed a negative linearchange in abundance with a gradient in zooplankton grazing intensity.Phytoflagellates were not grazed and showed a positive linearchange in abundance with increasing zooplankton biomass. Theseeffects, as well as shortening of filament length of Anabaena,were caused by raptorial feeding by the alanoid copepod Boeckellapropinqua which dominated the zooplankton. Phytoplankton growthwas not stimulated by addition of nutrients, suggesting nutrientregeneration was not important. Diel and vertical changes infeeding and NH₄-N regeneration rates were measured in Marchand June 1988. Diel differences were more pronounced in Marchwhen the water column was stratified. Specific feeding rateswere more important than vertical changes in zooplankton biomassin determining community grazing rates in March, but in Junewhen the water column was mixed, vertical distribution of zooplanktonbiomass was important. Zooplankton grazing was an importantloss process for phytoplankton in the lower part of the epilimnionin Lake Rotongaio.     

Fish-induced changes in zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton and bacterioplankton: a long-term study in shallow hypertrophic Lake Sobygaard

The impact of fish-mediated changes on the structure and grazingof zooplankton on phytoplankton and bacterioplankton was studiedin Lake Søbygaard during the period 1984–92 bymeans of in vitro grazing experiments (¹⁴C-labelled phytoplankton,³H-labelled bacterioplankton) and model predictions. Measuredzooplankton clearance rates ranged from 0–25 ml l^–1h^–1 on phytoplankton to 0–33 ml l^–1 h^–1on bacterioplankton.The highest rates were found during thesummer when Daphnia spp. were dominant. As the phytoplanktonbiomass was substantially greater than that of bacterioplanktonthroughout the study period, ingestion of phytoplankton was26-fold greater than that of bacterioplankton. Multiple regressionanalysis of the experimental data revealed that Daphnia spp.,Bosmina longirostris and Cyclops vicinus, which were the dominantzooplankton, all contributed significantly to the variationin ingestion of phytoplankton, while only Daphnia spp. contributedsignificantly to that of bacterioplankton. Using estimated meanvalues for clearance and ingestion rates for different zooplankters,we calculated zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton and bacterioplanktonon the basis of monitoring data of lake plankton obtained duringa 9 year study period. Summer mean grazing ranged from 2 to4% of phytoplankton production and 2% of bacterioplankton productionto maxima of 53 and 88%, respectively. The grazing percentagedecreased with increasing density of planktivorous fish caughtin August each year using gill nets and shore-line electrofishing.The changes along a gradient of planktivorous fish abundanceseemed highest for bacterioplankton. Accordingly, the percentagecontribution of bacterioplankton to the total ingestion of thetwo carbon sources decreased from a summer mean value of 8%in Daphnia-dominated communities at lower fish density to 0.7–1.1%at high fish density, when cyclopoid copepods or Bosmina androtifers dominated. Likewise, the percentage of phytoplanktonproduction channelled through the bacteria varied, it beinghighest (5–8%) at high fish densities. It is argued thatthe negative impact of zooplankton grazing on bacterioplanktonin shallow lakes is highest at intermediate phosphorus levels,under which conditions Daphnia dominate the zooplankton community.     

The spatial and temporal dynamics of deep chlorophyll layers in high-mountain lakes: effects of nutrients, grazing and herbivore nutrient recycling as growth determinants

Deep chlorophyll layers (DCL) are a common feature of oligotrophiclakes, yet the mechanisms that form and maintain them are notunderstood fully. These phytoplankton populations occur in themetalimnia of lakes where light levels are moderate to low,and where nutrient levels and zooplankton grazing pressure aredifferent than in the epilimnion. To test the importance ofnutrients and grazing pressure for algal growth in differentlake strata, microcosm experiments and monitoring were conductedin two oligotrophic lakes in the Rocky Mountains of North Americathat contain DCL. In situ microcosm experiments with naturalphytoplankton communities from three depth strata were conductedwith macronutrient additions and with and without the naturalzooplankton grazing communities. Alkaline phosphatase assaysand the in situ microcosm experiments indicated less nutrientlimitation in the metalimnia than in the epilimnia of both lakes.Zooplankton grazing in the experiments decreased algal populationgrowth rates by as much as 6% day^–1, with impacts shiftingto progressively deeper strata over the summer. Zooplanktongrazing losses, however, were partially offset by nutrient recyclingthat increased algal growth rates. Depth-differential nutrientdeficiency and zooplankton grazing and recycling interactedto maintain the DCL in these lakes.     

Zooplankton community grazing in a hypertrophic lake (Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa)

Seasonal abundance as total biomass and specific densities ofthe main herbivorous zooplankton (>60 µm) in hypertrophicHartbeespoort Dam from 1981 to 1983 are described. After springzooplankton biomass maxima each year there followed a mid-summerdecline in the Daphnia population and a shift to a smaller bodiedcladoceran community dominated by Ceriodaphnia concomitant witha change from largely edible phytoplankton species to abundantcolonial Microcystis. In situ community grazing rates were measuredthroughout 1983 using a ¹⁴C-labelled unicellular alga. Integratedcommunity grazing rates measured in the aerobic water columnwere highest in December (260.2%/day) when Daphnia was abundantand the edible component of the phytoplankton was diminishing.Lowest integrated community grazing rates occurred in January–February(19.8–35.3%/day) and July (28.3%/day) when the phytoplanktonwas composed almost entirely of Microcysris, and Ceriodaphniadominated the zooplankton community whilst food availabilitywas low. Feeding in Ceriodaphnia was not hindered by abundantlarge Microcysris colonies; total biomass specific grazing ratewas high when Ceriodaphnia dominated and low when Daphnia dominatedthe zoo-plankton community. Results indicate that in hypertrophicconditions it is unlikely that large filter-feeders such asDaphnia are able to retard or limit the development of Cyanophyceaeblooms by high grazing pressure.     

Response of phytoplankton and bacteria to nutrients and zooplankton: a mesocosm experiment

Although both nutrient inputs and zooplankton grazing are importantto phytoplankton and bacteria in lakes, controversy surroundsthe relative importance of grazing pressure for these two groupsof organisms. For phytoplankton, the controversy revolves aroundwhether zooplankton grazers, especially large cladocerans likeDaphnia, can effectively reduce phytoplankton populations regardlessof nutrient conditions. For bacteria, little is known aboutthe balance between possible direct and indirect effects ofboth nutrients and zooplankton grazing. However, there is evidencethat bacteria may affect phytoplankton responses to nutrientsor zooplankton grazing through direct or apparent competition.We performed a mesocosm experiment to evaluate the relativeimportance of the effects of nutrients and zooplankton grazingfor phytoplankton and bacteria, and to determine whether bacteriamediate phytoplankton responses to these factors. The factorialdesign crossed two zooplankton treatments (unsieved and sieved)with four nutrient treatments (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µgphosphorus (P) l^–1 day^–1 together with nitrogen(N) at a N:P ratio of 20:1 by weight). Weekly sieving with 300µm mesh reduced the average size of crustacean zooplanktonin the mesocosms, decreased the numbers and biomass of Daphnia,and increased the biomass of adult copepods. Nutrient enrichmentcaused significant increases in phytoplankton chlorophyll a(4–5x), bacterial abundance and production (1.3x and 1.6x,respectively), Daphnia (3x) and total zooplankton biomass (2x).Although both total phytoplankton chlorophyll a and chlorophylla in the <35 µm size fraction were significantly lowerin unsieved mesocosms than in sieved mesocosms, sieving hadno significant effect on bacterial abundance or production.There was no statistical interaction between nutrient and zooplanktontreatments for total phytoplankton biomass or bacterial abundance,although there were marginally significant interactions forphytoplankton biomass <35 µm and bacterial production.Our results do not support the hypothesis that large cladoceransbecome less effective grazers with enrichment; rather, the differencebetween phytoplankton biomass in sieved versus unsieved zooplanktontreatments increased across the gradient of nutrient additions.Furthermore, there was no evidence that bacteria buffered phytoplanktonresponses to enrichment by either sequestering P or affectingthe growth of zooplankton.     

Summer dynamics of the deep chlorophyll maximum in Lake Tahoe

Vertical profiles of chlorophyll and phytoplankton biomass weremeasured in Lake Tahoe from July 1976 through April 1977. Adeep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) persisted during summer and earlyautumn (July—October) near 100 m, well below the mixedlayer and at the upper surface of the nitracline. The DCM coincidedwith the phytoplankton biomass maximum as determined from cellcounts. In addition, the composition of the phytoplankton assemblagewas highly differentiated with respect to depth. Cyclotellastelligera was the predominant species in the mixed layer whilethe major species in the DCM layer included C. ocellata andseveral green ultraplanktonic species. In situ cell growth playsa substantial role in maintaining the DCM, but sinking of cellsfrom shallower depths and zooplankton grazing above the DCMmay contribute to the maintenance of the DCM. Calculations supportthe interpretation that the summer DCM persists at the boundarybetween an upper, nutrient-limited phytoplankton assemblageand a deeper, light-limited assemblage.     

Top-down effects of crustacean zooplankton on pelagic microorganisms in a mesotrophic lake

A series of single-factor in situ experiments was conductedin a mesotrophic lake in Brandenburg, North Germany, to studythe predatory impact of Eudiaptomus graciloides (adults, copepodites,nauplii), cyclopoid copepods (adult Diacyclops bicuspidatus,Thermocyclops oithonoides) and daphnids (adult Daphnia hyalina,Daphnia cucullata) on the microbial community (bacteria, autotrophicpicoplankton, flagellates, ciliates). All zooplankton speciestested reduced the ciliate community significantly and ingestionrates were always higher for ciliates in the 20–55 µmsize category as compared to smaller ciliates (10–20 µm).Adult E.graciloides, which exhibited the highest predatory impacton ciliates, differed from cyclopoids and daphnids by theirability to decimate ciliates to very low abundances. Ingestionrates of ciliates by the crustacean zooplankton followed thesequence E.graciloides > daphnids = cyclopoids = copepodites.While top-down control was evident for ciliates, top-down effectsdown to the autotrophic picoplankton and flagellates were mostlyrestricted to Daphnia-dominated treatments. Top-down effectswere never strong enough to produce negative bacterial growthrates. For all zooplankton tested, clearance rates for ciliatesexceeded those for phytoplankton. Besides the potential of thecrustacean zooplankton to influence the structure of ciliatecommunities, ciliates may contribute to the energy demands ofcopepods and daphnids, especially when phytoplankton resourcesare limited.     

Pelagic carbon metabolism in a eutrophic lake during a clear-water phase

Dissolved and paniculate organic carbon (DOC and POC, respectively),primary production, bacterial production, bacterial carbon demandand community grazing were measured for 9 weeks in eutrophicFrederiksborg Slotssø. The period covered the declineof the spring bloom, a clear-water phase and a summer phasewith increasing phytoplankton biomass. The process rates andchanges in pools of organic carbon were combined in a carbonbudget for the epilimnion. The POC budget showed a close balancefor both the post-spring bloom and the clear-water phase, whilea surplus was found in the summer phase. Production of POC wasdominated by phytoplankton (2/3) compared to bacteria (1/3)during all phases, and there was a significant correlation betweenphytoplankton and bacterial production rates (r² = 0.48, P <0.039). Bacterial demand for DOC was balanced by productionand changes in the pool of DOC during the decline of the springbloom, but the calculated demand exceeded the supply by 81 and167%, respectively, during the other two periods. The discrepancywas most probably due to an underestimation of bacterial growthefficiency and an overestimation of in situ bacterial productionin carbon units. Production of bacterial substrate by zooplanktonactivity was estimated to be higher than the direct excretionof organic carbon from phytoplankton. The biological successionwas regulated by the balance between area primary productionand community grazing. The clear-water phase was initiated bya combination of low primary production due to low surface irradianceand high community grazing (100 mmol C m^–2 day^–1),which caused a decrease in phytoplankton biomass. However, dueto the high initial phytoplankton biomass, community grazingwas not high enough to cause a significant decrease in areaprimary production. The summer phase was initiated by a decreasein community grazing followed by an increase in phytoplanktonbiomass. Based on these observations and calculations of areaprimary production as a function of chlorophyll concentrations,we suggest that the possibility for zooplankton to regulatephytoplankton biomass in temperate lakes decreases with increasingnutrient level.     

Carbon dynamics in the 'grazing food chain' of a subtropical lake

Studies were conducted over a 13 month period at four pelagicsites in eutrophic Lake Okeechobee, Florida (USA), in orderto quantify carbon (C) uptake rates by size-fractionated phytoplankton,and subsequent transfers of C to zooplankton. This was accomplishedusing laboratory ¹⁴C tracer methods and natural plankton assemblages.The annual biomass of picoplankton (<2 µm), nanoplankton(2–20 µm) and microplankton (<20 µm averaged60, 389 and 100 µg C 1^–1 respectively, while correspondingrates of C uptake averaged 7, 51 and 13 µg C1^–1h^–1. The biomass of microzooplankton (40–200 µm)and macrozooplankton (<200 µm averaged 18 and 60 µgC 1^–1, respectively, while C uptake rates by these herbivoregroups averaged 2 and 3 µg C 1^–1 h^–1. Therewere no strong seasonal patterns in any of the plankton metrics.The ratio of zooplankton to phytoplankton C uptake averaged7% over the course of the study. This low value is typical ofthat observed in eutrophic temperate lakes with small zooplanktonand large inedible phytoplankton, and indicates ineffectiveC transfer in the grazing food chain. On a single occasion,there was a high density (<40 1^–1) of Daphnia lumholrzii,a large-bodied exotic cladoceran. At that time, zooplanktoncommunity C uptake was <20 µg C 1^–1 h^–1and the ratio of zooplankton to phytoplankton C uptake was near30%. If D.lumholrzii proliferates in Lake Okeechobee and theother Florida lakes where it has recently been observed, itmay substantially alter planktonic C dynamics.     

Experimental evaluation of herbivory in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi relevant to ctenophore-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA

Herbivory of Mnemiopsis leidyi and its interactions with phytoplanktonand non-gelatinous zooplankton were examined in small-scalemicrocosm experiments. Clearance rates for M. leidyi incubatedwith phytoplankton were generally negative, but ranged up to4.5 1 ctenophore^–1 day^–1 when the large (80 µmø) diatom Ditylum brightwelli was offered as a food source.These highest ingestion rates would provide Mnemiopsis withonly 21 % of its daily carbon requirements for respiration.Mean shrinkage of M. leidyi was 8.2–51% when incubatedwith phytoplankton. Although M. leidyi neither fed activelyon phytoplankton, nor satisfied its nutritional needs on sucha diet, the chain-forming diatom Skeletonema costatum becameentangled in mucus strands and balls produced by M. leidyi inthe absence of zooplankton. Attachment onto mucus occurred atphytoplankton concentrations commonly observed in NarragansettBay and may be important in the formation of "marine snow" duringsummer M. leidyi pulses; phytoplankton sinking rate and the"package size" available to herbivores would also be affected.The experiments support our previous hypothesis based on fieldobservations in Narragansett Bay that M. leidyi indirectly regulatesphytoplankton abundance there during the summer bloom as a consequenceof predation on zooplankton. The extent to which M. leidyi influencedphytoplankton dynamics in the microcosms was dependent on therelative abundance and physiological state of the three trophiclevels. A food web diagram for M. leidyi is presented.     

Phytoplankton and zooplankton development in a lowland, temperate river

The longitudinal and seasonal patterns of plankton developmentwere examined over 2 years in a lowland, temperate river: theRideau River (Ontario, Canada). Following an initial decreasein phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass as water flowed fromthe headwaters into the Rideau River proper, there was an increasein chlorophyll a (chl a) and zooplankton biomass with downstreamtravel. At approximately river km 60, both phytoplankton andzooplankton reached their maximum biomass of 27 µg l^–1(chl a) and 470 µg l^–1 (dry mass), respectively.Downstream of river km 60, the biomass of both planktonic communitiesdeclined significantly despite increasing nutrient concentrationsand favorable light conditions. These downstream declines maybe due to the feeding activity of the exotic zebra mussel (Dreissenapolymorpha) which was at high density in downstream reaches(>1000 individuals m^–2). There was no evidence forlongitudinal phasing of phytoplankton and zooplankton, as increasesand decreases in chl a and zooplankton biomass appeared to coincide.Overall, chl a was best predicted by total phosphorus (R²=0.43),whereas zooplankton biomass was best predicted by chl a (R²=0.20).There was no evidence for significant grazing effects of zooplanktonon phytoplankton biomass.     

Continuous plankton records: seasonal variations in the distribution and abundance of plankton in the North Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea

Charts are presented of the seasonal variations in the distributionof four phytoplankton and five zooplankton taxa in the NorthAtlantic and the North Sea. The main factors determining theseasonal variations appear to be the distribution of the mainoverwintering stocks, the current system and, in some instances,temperature control of the rate of population increase. Informationis presented about the variation with latitude (over the rangefrom 34° N to 65 ° N) of the seasonal regime of theplankton. On the assumption that there is a relationship betweennutrient supply and vertical temperature stratification themain features of this variability can be interpreted. In thesouth (to about 43° N) nutrient limitation plus grazingappear to be dominant, resulting in a bimodal seasonal cycleof phytoplankton. North of about 60° N the system appearsto be limited by the size of the phytoplankton stocks beinggrazed primarily by Calanus Finmarchicus and Euphausiacea. Inan extensive zone, from about 44° N to 60° N, it wouldappear that the spring bloom of phytoplankton is under-exploitedby grazing while in summer the zooplankton graze the daily productionof the phytoplankton, the stocks of which are probably maintainedby in situ nutrient regeneration. The implications, for at leastthis mid-latitude zone, that rates and fluxes of processes,as opposed to density dependent interactions between stocks,play a major role in the dynamics of the seasonal cycle is consistentwith previously reported observations suggesting that physicalenvironmental factors play a major role in determining year-to-yearfluctuations in the abundance of the plankton.     

Food-web manipulations influence grazer control of phytoplankton growth rates in Lake Michigan

Stocking piscivorous salmonids in Lake Michigan produced dramaticalterations in food-web structure, including higher numbersof large-bodied zooplankton (especially Daphnia pulicaria),lower summer chlorophyll concentrations and increased watertransparency. Experimental determinations of epilimnetic phytoplanktongrowth rates and of zooplankton grazing rates indicate thatherbivorous zooplankton controlled algal dynamics during thesummer of 1983 because grazers occupied the surface waters throughoutthe day. In 1985, however, both large- and small-bodied Daphniamade approximately equal contributions to total grazer biomass,and all grazers displayed pronounced diel vertical migrations,visiting epilimnetic waters only at night. This prohibited zooplanktonfrom controlling algal dynamics because grazing losses did notexceed phytoplankton growth rates. The changes in zooplanktoncommunity composition and behavior observed in summer 1985 probablyresulted from increased predation by visually orienting planktivorousfish, especially bloater chub (Coregonus hoyi). Effects of food-webmanipulations on phytoplankton dynamics were evident only duringJuly and August. During spring and early summer copepods dominateLake Michigan's zooplankton community. Owing to their smallbody size, copepods are less susceptible to fish predation andexhibit much lower filtering rates than Daphnia. Variabilityin zooplanktivorous fish abundance probably has little effecton phytoplankton dynamics during spring and early summer.     

Food web interactions in a Calanus finmarchicus dominated pelagic ecosystem--a mesocosm study

The significance of nauplii versus copepodite stage V of Calanusfinmarchicus grazing and their effects on the structure of thefood web were investigated during two sampling periods of 7–8days in March and April in experimental mesocosms held in aNorwegian fjord over a 2 month period. The mesocosms were manipulatedby the addition of two different levels of inorganic nutrients(control versus enriched). During the ‘naupliar’period in March, the phytoplankton was characterized by a diatombloom while during the ‘copepodite’ period in April,it was in a post-bloom phase characterized by small-celled species,mainly Phaeocystis pouchetii. Phytoplankton, bacterial and protozooanbiomass and production rates were measured in addition to copepodbiomass. Copepod grazing was estimated by three different methods:(i) gut fluorescence; (ii) chlorophyll clearance from the water;and (iii) growth method measured as body carbon increase. Thetwo latter methods gave similar results for nauplii, but allthree gave different results for the copepodites. Independentsomatic growth, based on changes in abundance and individualcarbon content, and grazing estimates revealed an overall growthefficiency of 0.66 ± 0.20 (mean ± S.E.) for copepodites.Empirical carbon flow models were constructed, which indicatedthat the nauplii could not control either phytoplankton or protozoangrowth in either the control or in the enriched system. Ignoringrecycling and sedimentation, the fate of the primary productionfor the nauplii-dominated community was to be grazed by a diverseand abundant protozooplankton community. In the copepodite-dominatedcommunity, the copepods grazed >100% of the daily primaryproduction, and also grazed heavily on a protozooplankton communityof low biomass and diversity and presumably on detritus. Thefate of the primary production in the two different copepodscenarios followed predicted routes for ‘low meso-zooplankton’and for ‘high meso-zooplankton’ biomass systems,as suggested by Wassmann (Wassmann, 1998).     

Cladoceran and rotifer grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in two shallow eutrophic lakes: in situ measurement with fluorescent microspheres

Metazooplankton grazing on bacteria and on the phytoplanktonof various sizes was estimated in shallow eutrophic lakes Kaiavereand Võrtsjärv (Estonia) by in situ feeding experimentswith fluorescent microspheres (diameters 0.5 µm for bacteriaand 3, 6 and 24 µm for phytoplankton). Zooplankton communitycomposition, abundance and food density were important factorsdetermining grazing rates in these lakes. Cladocerans and rotifersfiltering rates (FR) and ingestion rates (IR) on bacteria andphytoplankton were several times higher in Lake Kaiavere wherebacterivorous rotifers and Daphnia contributed more to zooplanktonassemblage. While cladocerans were generally the main phytoplanktonconsumers, both lakes differed with respect to the groups ofbacterivores. Based on consumption of fluorescent microspheres,the metazooplankton grazing rates were relatively low and hadlow impact on production and standing stock of bacteria andingestible phytoplankton (<30 µm). On average, 0.5and 0.1% of standing stock of bacteria and 2.6 and 1.0% of standingstock of ingestible phytoplankton was grazed daily by metazooplanktonin lakes Kaiavere and Võrtsjärv, respectively. Thatcorresponded to daily grazing of 4.1% of the bacterial productionand 0.43% of the total primary production (PP) by metazooplanktonin Lake Kaiavere compared with 4.3 and 0.06% in Lake Võrtsjärv,respectively. The results suggest that the majority of consumptionof the bacterial and phytoplankton PP is most likely channelledthrough the microbial loop.     

Elemental stoichiometry of lower food web components in arctic and temperate lakes

Lakes were surveyed to assess the potential patterns of latitudinalvariation in carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometryof lower food web components. Thirty-four lakes were surveyedat an arctic latitude (68°38'N, 149°38'W) and 10 lakesat a temperate latitude (46°13'N, 89°32'W) during 1997.The temperate data set was augmented with earlier survey resultsemploying similar methods. It was hypothesized that differencesin environmental variables across latitude would cause differencesin community C:N:P ratios, leading to differences in trophicinteractions. Physical measurements (light, temperature), sestonand zooplankton were collected from each lake. Seston and zooplanktonwere analyzed for C, N and P content, and zooplankton were countedand measured for biomass estimates. The degree of trophic interactionbetween seston and zooplankton was assessed by (i) measuringelemental imbalances between seston and zooplankton and (ii)calculating the potential recycling ratio by the zooplanktoncommunity available for seston. Seston C:nutrient, but not N:P,ratios were higher in temperate than arctic lakes. Conversely,arctic zooplankton had higher C:nutrient, but not N:P, ratiosthan zooplankton in temperate lakes. Elemental imbalances weregreater in temperate than in arctic lakes, but N:P stoichiometryof potential zooplankton recycling was nearly identical betweenthe two latitudes. Zooplankton community C:N:P ratios were notrelated to either latitude or seston C:N:P. In accordance withstoichiometric theory, relative abundances of calanoid copepodswere positively correlated with seston C:N in temperate lakes.Additionally, relative abundances of Daphnia were negativelycorrelated with seston C:N ratios in temperate and arctic lakes,and positively correlated with N:P ratios in the arctic. Ingeneral, these results suggest that seston and zooplankton communitystoichiometry differ across latitude, and these differenceshave the potential to affect trophic interactions.     

Ctenophore-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, during 1972-1977

Plankton dynamics at a station in lower Narragansett Bay, RIare compared for six summer and fall seasons, 1972–1977.In four of these years, initiation of the summer pulse of thectenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi was accompanied by a rapid declinein zooplankton abundance and a summer phytoplankton bloom. Terminationof the phytoplankton bloom coincided with depleted ctenophoreabundance and increased zooplankton biomass in two of the years.Yearly variations in the summer abundance of the diatom Skeletonemacostatum were positively related to the magnitude of the ctenophorepulse. The magnitude of ctenophore population was related tothe zooplankton biomass present at the start of the pulse. Theserelationships, the timing and magnitude of the plankton eventssuggest that M. leidyi regulated summer zooplankton and phytoplanktondynamics. Ctenophores may control phytoplankton blooms indirectlythrough their predation on herbivorous zooplankton and directlyby the nutrient excretion accompanying such grazing. This evidencethat a planktonic carnivore two trophic steps removed from thephytoplankton regulates the latter's dynamics in NarragansettBay is analogous to reported regulation of benthic algal (kelp)dynamics by the sea otter, lobster and various crabs throughtheir predation on herbivorous sea urchins. The factors responsiblefor the seasonal decrease in ctenophores remain unresolved;ctenophore predators on Mnemiopsis are absent in NarragansettBay. Infection by the vermiform larval anemone, Edwardsia lineata,grazing by the butterfish, Peprilus triacanthus, and changesin food availability, temperature and salinity likewise do notexplain this disappearance.     

Non-linear dynamics of a pelagic ecosystem model with multiple predator and prey types

Using numerical techniques, we explored the dynamics of a one-dimensional,six-component nutrient–phytoplankton–zooplankton(NPZ) model in which zooplankton grazed on a mixed prey field.Five alternative functional forms were implemented to describezooplankton grazing, and the form for predation on mesozooplanktonwas prescribed by a product of a specific predation rate (h)and the mesozooplankton concentration raised to a power (q),which we varied between one and two. With all five grazing functions,Hopf bifurcations, where the form of the solution transitionedbetween steady equilibrium and periodic limit cycles, persistedacross the q–h parameter space. Regardless of the valuesof h and q, with some forms of the grazing function, we wereunable to find steady equilibrium solutions that simultaneouslycomprised non-zero concentrations for all six model components.Extensions of Michaelis–Menten-based single resource grazingformulations to multiple resources resulted in periodic solutionsfor a large portion of the q–h space. Conversely, extensionsof the sigmoidal grazing formulation to multiple resources resultedin steady solutions for a large portion of q–h parameterspace. Our results demonstrate the consequences of the functionalform of biological processes on the form of the model solutions.Both the steady or oscillatory nature of state variable concentrationsand the likelihood of their elimination are important considerationsfor ecosystem-modelling studies, particularly when attemptingto model an ecosystem in which multiple phytoplankton and zooplanktoncomponents are thought to persist simultaneously for at leasta portion of the seasonal cycle.     

Day/night differences in the grazing impact of marine copepods

Day/night differences in the removal rate of phytoplankton can occur as a result of increased copepod grazing rates at certain times of the day and diel vertical migration of animals. We conducted shipboard grazing experiments and fine-scale vertical zooplankton sampling to resolve these behaviors. Day/night feeding differences were compared in the center of several warm-core Gulf Stream rings, under conditions of no lateral water mass exchange, in the mesohaline portion of Chesapeake Bay and when following drogues in the Chesapeake Bay plume. Day/night variations in copepod biomass in the surface mixed layer were greater in neritic waters as compared to the open ocean stations. Day/night differences in weight-specific copepod filtration rates varied less than biomass. At the neritic stations copepod grazing was often higher at night, whereas at the oceanic stations day/night grazing rates were similar or daytime grazing rates were highest. The night/day ratio of zooplankton grazing impact on the phytoplankton community (the product of zooplankton biomass and their weight-specific grazing rate) averaged 4.8 in the Chesapeake Bay plume and 1.6 in warm-core Gulf Stream rings. Our results suggest that at lower food levels, there often are less day/night differences in the removal rate of phytoplankton by the copepod community.