Plasma insulin and C-peptide responses to oral glucose load after physical exercise in men with normal and impaired glucose tolerance

Blood glucose, plasma insulin and C-peptide responses to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were studied under basal conditions and immediately after 90-min exercise (60% VO2 max) in nondiabetic subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance. During the postexercise recovery blood glucose response to OGTT was increased in normal subjects and markedly decreased in those with impaired glucose tolerance, while insulin and C-peptide responses were diminished in both subgroups. The ratio of blood glucose to insulin was similarly elevated in all subjects. Comparing with basal conditions no significant changes were found in C-peptide to insulin ratio in response to OGTT after exercise, although a tendency towards an elevation of this ratio was noted in the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. The data indicate that the reduced insulin response to OGTT during postexercise recovery in healthy subjects is due to diminished insulin secretion without any substantial changes in the hormone removal from blood, whereas in the glucose intolerant men the latter process may be enhanced.     

Effect of Dexamethasone on Oral Glucose Tolerance in Healthy Adults

ObjectiveTo determine the dose-response and time course of action of a single dose of dexamethasone on plasma glucose and insulin dynamics in healthy adults.MethodsParticipants included healthy adults who met the following inclusion criteria: 18 to 65 years of age, body mass index of 18 to 25 kg/m2, no family history of diabetes mellitus, not taking any medication known to affect glucose tolerance, and nonpregnant state for female participants. Each participant underwent 3 sequential blocks of 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) on days 1, 2, and 3; this sequence was repeated on 3 different occasions separated by more than 2 weeks. On the first day of each block, participants reported to the research center after a 10- to 12-hour overnight fast, and fasting baseline blood samples for glucose, insulin, and C-peptide were obtained. Baseline (0 mg) OGTT was then performed with a 75-g glucose load, and blood samples were collected at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes for measurements of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. After the baseline OGTT on day 1, a single dose of either 2-, 4- or 8-mg of dexamethasone was administered orally. Twenty-four and 48 hours later, participants returned for additional OGTTs.ResultsTen healthy volunteers (4 male and 6 female) were enrolled. The effect of dexamethasone was maximal 24 hours after 8-mg dexamethasone compared with the effect observed after no dexamethasone administration. At 60 minutes during the OGTT (following 8-mg dexamethasone), blood glucose increased from 127 ± 7.1 mg/dL (6.35 ± 0.36 mmol/L) to 176 ± 19 mg/dL (8.8 ± 0.95 mmol/L), insulin increased from 49.3 ± 3.2 μIU/mL (342 ± 22 pmol/L) to 119.7 ± 10.1 μIU/mL (831 ± 70 pmol/L), and C-peptide increased from 6376 ± 510 pg/L (1913 ± 153 pmol/L) to 10 143 ± 1016 pg/L (3043 ± 305 pmol/L); the 60-minute levels returned towards baseline at 48 hours. Smaller changes were observed with 2- and 4-mg dexamethasone. Twenty-four hours after 8-mg dexamethasone, there was a 2.2- and 1.5-fold increase in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and homeostasis model assessment of β cell, respectively, and a 2.5-fold decrease in the Matsuda sensitivity index.ConclusionsA single oral dose of 8-mg dexamethasone increases blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels maximally at 24 hours, 1 hour following 75-g OGTT. A dexamethasone stress test might identify persons at increased risk for type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010:16:770-777)     

Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4) levels do not change after oral glucose tolerance test and after dexamethasone, but correlate with some indices of insulin resistance in humans

Introduction: Secretory products from adipocytes may contribute to deterioration in glycaemic control and increased insulin resistance (IR). Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4) may increase IR in mice, with elevated levels in insulin-resistant mice and humans with obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, the mechanisms regulating RBP-4 synthesis remain not fully understood. It is not clear whether short-term glucose-induced hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia as well as glucocorticosteroid-induced increase in IR might be reflected in alterations in serum RBP-4 levels in humans. In order to investigate this, we measured serum RBP-4, glucose and insulin concentrations during 75.0 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) - Study 1, as well as before and after oral administration of dexamethasone - Study 2. Material and methods: Both studies included 35 subjects (8 males), age (mean +/- SD) 39.1 +/- 15.6 years, BMI 35.8 +/- 8.7 kg/m(2). Twenty-four of those subjects (5 males), age 38.7 +/- 15.1 years, BMI 34.4 +/- 8.3 kg/m(2), had 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) - Study 1. Blood samples were taken before (0 minutes), and at 60 and 120 minutes of OGTT. 17 subjects (3 males, 4 subjects with type 2 diabetes), age 43.1 +/- 18.1 years, BMI 36.7 +/- 9.0 kg/m(2) underwent screening for Cushing's disease/syndrome (Study 2). Dexamethasone was administered in a dose of 0.5 mg every 6 hours for 48 hours. Fasting serum concentrations of RBP-4, glucose and insulin were assessed before (D0) and after 48 hours of dexamethasone administration (D2). IR was assessed by HOMA in all non-diabetic subjects and in subjects participating in study 1 also by Insulin Resistance Index (IRI), which takes into account glucose and insulin levels during OGTT. Results: Glucose administration resulted in significant increases in insulin and glucose (p < 0.0001). There was, however, no change in RBP-4 concentrations (124.1 +/- 32 mg/ml at 0 minutes, 123 +/- 35 mg/ml at 60 minutes and 126.5 +/- 37.5 mg/ml at 120 minutes of OGTT, p = ns). All subjects in Study 2 achieved suppression of cortisol below 50 nmo/l. Dexamethasone administration resulted in an increase in fasting insulin (from 11.6 +/- 6.8 to 17.1 +/- 7.2 muU/ml; p = 0.003), and an increase in HOMA (from 2.73 +/- 1.74 to 4.02 +/- 2.27; p = 0.015), although without a significant change in RBP-4 levels (119 +/- 26.8 vs. 117.5 +/- 24.8 mg/ml, p = ns). RBP-4 correlated with fasting insulin (r = 0.40, p = 0.025), fasting glucose (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) and HOMA (r = 0.43, p = 0.015), but not with IRI (r = 0.19, p = 0.31). There was, however, only a moderate correlation between HOMA and IRI (r = 0.49 [r(2) = 0.24]; p = 0.006, Spearman rank correlation), while the best correlation was obtained between the product of glucose and insulin levels at 60 min of OGTT and IRI in a non-linear model (r = 0.94 [r(2) = 0.88]; p<0.00001). In subjects who received dexamethasone, a positive correlation between RBP-4 and HOMA (p = 0.01) was lost after two days of dexamethasone administration (p = 0.61). Conclusions: RBP-4 levels do not change during oral glucose tolerance test or after a dexamethasone-induced increase in insulin resistance. This implies that it is highly unlikely that RBP-4 is involved in short-term regulation of glucose homeostasis in humans and that it responds to short-term changes in insulin resistance. A moderate correlation between RBP-4 and some insulin resistance indices (HOMA) does not exclude the fact that RBP-4 might be one of many factors that can influence insulin sensitivity in humans.     

Endogenous opiate modulators of insulin secretion in the obese

The effects of endogenous opiates on insulin response to oral glucose load were studied in obese subjects and in lean healthy volunteers. None of these having a family diabetes. After 3 days on an 1,800 cal./m2, 40% carbohydrate diet all subjects underwent two standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), one of which was accompanied by an i. v. administration of 10 mg of, an antagonist of opiates, the naloxone. In one group of obese impaired oral glucose tolerance test occurred. All obese, but not the lean healthy volunteers, showed: 1) increased basal plasma insulin levels, 2) higher insulin response to OGTT, 3) a decrease in insulin response to OGTT after naloxone administration, with significant differences at 60 min (p less than 0.01) and 90 min (p less than 0.025). In none of the subjects significant differences were observed in blood glucose levels after OGTT plus naloxone administration. These data suggest that increased endogenous opiates may affect insulin response to glucose in obese with impaired or normal oral glucose tolerance test. At present there seems to be no satisfactory explanation for unchanged blood glucose levels during OGTT with and without naloxone despite a decrease in insulin secretion in the obese patients.     

Visfatin levels do not change after the oral glucose tolerance test and after a dexamethasone-induced increase in insulin resistance in humans

INTRODUCTION, MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visfatin is a cytokine, mainly expressed in visceral fat, that exerts insulin-mimicking effects in rodents through activation of an insulin receptor, although the binding-site is distinct from that of insulin. However, the mechanisms that regulate visfatin synthesis are still not fully understood. In particular, it is not clear whether short-term glucose-induced hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia as well as a glucocorticoid-induced increase in insulin resistance are reflected in appreciable alterations in serum visfatin levels in humans. In order to investigate this we measured serum visfatin, glucose and insulin concentrations during a 75.0 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) [Study 1], as well as before and after oral administration of dexamethasone [Study 2]. Study 1 included 17 subjects (2 males), aged 35.7 +/- 15.6 (mean +/- SD) years of BMI 35.2 +/- 9.3 kg/m(2). Blood samples were taken before (0 minutes) and at 60 and 120 minutes after glucose administration. Study 2 included 20 subjects (4 males, 5 subjects with type 2 diabetes), aged 42.1 +/- 17.2 years of BMI 36.7 +/- 8.38 kg/m(2) who underwent screening for Cushing's disease/syndrome. Dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg every 6 hours for 48 hours. Fasting serum concentrations of visfatin, glucose and insulin were assessed before (D0) and after 48 hours of dexamethasone administration (D2). Insulin resistance was assessed according to the HOMA method in non-diabetic individuals (n = 15). RESULTS: In Study 1 two subjects were found to have impaired glucose tolerance and one subject was found to have diabetes mellitus. Glucose administration resulted in a highly significant increase in insulin (from 11.4 +/- 7.2 microU/mL at 0 min to 98.9 +/- 68.6 microU/mL at 60 min and 72.6 +/- 45.1 microU/mL at 120 minute of OGTT, p < 0.001 for 60 and 120 minutes in comparison to baseline). However, there was no change in serum visfatin concentrations (84.6 +/- 11.6 ng/mL at 0 minutes, 82.6 +/- 12.7 ng/mL at 60 minutes and 81.1 +/- 14.5 ng/mL at 120 minutes of OGTT, p = ns). All subjects in Study 2 achieved suppression of cortisol concentrations below 50 nmo/l. Dexamethasone administration resulted in an increase in fasting insulin (from 11.5 +/- 6.9 to 16.9 +/- 7.6 microU/mL; p = 0.011) and an increase in HOMA (from 2.73 +/- 1.74 to 4.02 +/- 2.27; p = 0.015), albeit without a significant change in serum visfatin concentrations (61.1 +/- 19.8 vs. 68.3 +/- 19.4 ng/mL, p = ns). In neither Study 1 nor Study 2 was there any significant correlation between serum visfatin and age, BMI or HOMA. CONCLUSIONS: There is a striking difference between the marked rise in insulin concentrations and the lack of change in visfatin concentrations during the oral glucose tolerance test. This implies that it is highly unlikely that visfatin is involved in the short-term regulation of glucose homeostasis in human subjects. Dexamethasone administration (4 mg/48 hours) induces an increase in insulin resistance, although without significant change in serum visfatin concentrations. Therefore in contrast to the in vitro data, short term glucocorticoid administration does not result in appreciable changes in serum levels of this adipocytokine. Furthermore, the results of our study do not support the notion that glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance is likely to be related to changes in serum concentrations of visfatin.     

Dehydroepiandrosterone in relation to adiposity, glucose tolerance and lipid spectra in Czech non-diabetic population

This study aimed to examine relationships between DHEA(S), anthropometric parameters, oral glucose tolerance test derived data and lipid spectra in a Czech non-diabetic population. 380 healthy volunteers both with and without a family history of diabetes type 2 (DM2) were enrolled into the study (women: n=235, age 28.9+/-9.4 years, BMI 22.3+/-4.5 kg/m(2), men: n=145, age 32.3+/-10.0 years, BMI 24.7+/-3.6 kg/m(2)). Spearman's correlations (both without and with the adjustment for age, age and BMI), as well as ANCOVA were used. Non-adjusted data showed many "beneficial" correlations between DHEA(S) and both anthropometric and metabolic variables. Statistical analysis revealed that almost all correlations of DHEA(S) to adiposity and fat distribution in men as well as in women disappeared after the adjustment. There are, however, differences between men and women in the correlation of DHEA(S) to insulin sensitivity and lipid levels. The use of hormonal contraceptives (COC) is also an important factor in this relationship. In men and also in women using COC, DHEA-S after adjustment correlated positively with fasting and stimulated glucose, insulin and C-peptide, and negatively with insulin sensitivity. In this respect, the benefit of DHEA(S) supplementation seems -- at least in terms of its alleged antiobesity and antidiabetogenic effects -- to be more than controversial.     

Insulin and C-peptide secretion and kinetics in humans: direct and model-based measurements during OGTT

To directly evaluate prehepatic secretion of pancreatic hormones during a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), we measured insulin and C-peptide in six healthy control, six obese, and six type 2 diabetic subjects in the femoral artery and hepatic vein by means of the hepatic catheterization technique. Hypersecretion in obesity was confirmed (309 +/- 66 nmol in obese vs. 117 +/- 22 in control and 79 +/- 13 in diabetic subjects, P 0.3, r(2) = 0.93), whereas estimation of hepatic insulin extraction and insulin clearance needs further investigation for improvement.     

Hepatic glucose autoregulation: responses to small, non-insulin-induced changes in arterial glucose

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sedentary dog is able to autoregulate glucose production (R(a)) in response to non-insulin-induced changes (<20 mg/dl) in arterial glucose. Dogs had catheters implanted >16 days before study. Protocols consisted of basal (-30 to 0 min) and bilateral renal arterial phloridzin infusion (0-180 min) periods. Somatostatin was infused, and glucagon and insulin were replaced to basal levels. In one protocol (Phl +/- Glc), glucose was allowed to fall from t = 0-90 min. This was followed by a period when glucose was infused to restore euglycemia (90-150 min) and a period when glucose was allowed to fall again (150-180 min). In a second protocol (EC), glucose was infused to compensate for the renal glucose loss due to phloridzin and maintain euglycemia from t = 0-180 min. Arterial insulin, glucagon, cortisol, and catecholamines remained at basal in both protocols. In Phl +/- Glc, glucose fell by approximately 20 mg/dl by t = 90 min with phloridzin infusion. R(a) did not change from basal in Phl +/- Glc despite the fall in glucose for the first 90 min. R(a) was significantly suppressed with restoration of euglycemia from t = 90-150 min (P < 0.05) and returned to basal when glucose was allowed to fall from t = 150-180 min. R(a) did not change from basal in EC. In conclusion, the liver autoregulates R(a) in response to small changes in glucose independently of changes in pancreatic hormones at rest. However, the liver of the resting dog is more sensitive to a small increment, rather than decrement, in arterial glucose.     

Impact of incretin hormones on beta-cell function in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance

The mechanisms by which the enteroinsular axis influences beta-cell function have not been investigated in detail. We performed oral and isoglycemic intravenous (IV) glucose administration in subjects with normal (NGT; n = 11) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 10), using C-peptide deconvolution to calculate insulin secretion rates and mathematical modeling to quantitate beta-cell function. The incretin effect was taken to be the ratio of oral to IV responses. In NGT, incretin-mediated insulin release [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)/IV ratio = 1.59 +/- 0.18, P = 0.004] amounted to 18 +/- 2 nmol/m(2) (32 +/- 4% of oral response), and its time course matched that of total insulin secretion. The beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.52 +/- 0.26, P = 0.02), rate sensitivity (response to glucose rate of change, OGTT/IV ratio = 2.22 +/- 0.37, P = 0.06), and glucose-independent potentiation were markedly higher with oral than IV glucose. In IGT, beta-cell glucose sensitivity (75 +/- 14 vs. 156 +/- 28 pmol.min(-1).m(-2).mM(-1) of NGT, P = 0.01) and potentiation were impaired on the OGTT. The incretin effect was not significantly different from NGT in terms of plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses, total insulin secretion, and enhancement of beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.73 +/- 0.24, P = NS vs. NGT). However, the time courses of incretin-mediated insulin secretion and potentiation were altered, with a predominance of glucose-induced vs. incretin-mediated stimulation. We conclude that, under physiological circumstances, incretin-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion results from an enhancement of all dynamic aspects of beta-cell function, particularly beta-cell glucose sensitivity. In IGT, beta-cell function is inherently impaired, whereas the incretin effect is only partially affected.     

Indomethacin does not affect endogenous glucose production in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In healthy subjects, basal endogenous glucose production is partly regulated by paracrine intrahepatic factors. It is currently unknown whether paracrine intrahepatic factors also influence the increased basal endogenous glucose production in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Administration of indomethacin to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stimulates endogenous glucose production and inhibits insulin secretion. Our aim was to evaluate whether this stimulatory effect on glucose production is solely attributable to inhibition of insulin secretion. In order to do this, we administered indomethacin to 5 patients with type 2 diabetes during continuous infusion of somatostatin to block endogenous insulin and glucagon secretion and infusion of basal concentrations of insulin and glucagon in a placebo-controlled study. Endogenous glucose production was measured 3 hours after the start of the somatostatin, insulin and glucagon infusion, for 4 hours after administration of placebo/indomethacin, by primed, continuous infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)] glucose. At the time of administration of placebo or indomethacin, there were no significant differences in plasma glucose concentrations and endogenous glucose production rates between the two experiments (16.4 +/- 2.09 mmol/l vs. 16.6 +/- 1.34 mmol/l and 17.7 +/- 1.05 micromol/kg/min and 17.0 +/- 1.06 micromol/kg/min), control vs. indomethacin). Plasma glucose concentration did not change significantly in the four hours after indomethacin or placebo administration. Endogenous glucose production in both experiments was similar after both placebo and indomethacin. Mean plasma C-peptide concentrations were all below the detection limit of the assay, reflecting adequate suppression of endogenous insulin secretion by somatostatin. There were no differences in plasma concentrations of insulin (76 +/- 5 vs. 74 +/- 4 pmol/l) and glucagon (69 +/- 8 vs. 71 +/- 6 ng/l) between the studies with levels remaining unchanged in both experiments. Plasma concentrations of cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were similar in the two studies and did not change significantly. We conclude that indomethacin stimulates endogenous glucose production in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by inhibition of insulin secretion.     

Plasma orexin and ghrelin response to the oral glucose tolerance test in obese women

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to examine the response of plasma orexin and ghrelin to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in obese women without additional disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group comprised 15 obese women aged 30.4+/-9.7 years of mean BMI 34.7+/-3.8 kg/m(2). The measurements were performed after an overnight fast and 30, 60 and 120 minutes after the oral administration of 75 grams of glucose. Serum concentrations of ghrelin and orexin A were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Serum concentrations of insulin were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Plasma glucose was determined by an enzymatic procedure. Body composition was determined by impedance analysis using Bodystat. RESULTS: We observed no significant differences between serum concentrations of ghrelin and orexin during OGTT. No correlations were found between serum ghrelin and orexin concentrations and serum insulin and glucose concentrations in any of the measurements. CONCLUSION: Oral glucose administration did not change serum concentrations of ghrelin and orexin A in obese women without additional disease.     

Acute caffeine ingestion does not impair glucose tolerance in persons with tetraplegia.

Acute caffeine (Caf) ingestion impairs glucose tolerance in able-bodied humans during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The mechanism responsible for this effect remains unclear, however, it is suggested to be due to the accompanying increase in epinephrine concentration. We examined whether or not Caf would elicit a glucose intolerance in persons with tetraplegia (TP) who do not exhibit an increased epinephrine response following Caf ingestion. All TP [n = 14; 9 incomplete (Inc) lesion, 5 complete (Com) lesion] completed two OGTT 1 h after consuming either gelatin (Pl) or Caf capsules (dose = 4 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected at baseline (time = 0 min), 1 h after capsule ingestion (time = 60 min), and every 30 min during the OGTT (time = 90-180 min). Glucose, insulin, proinsulin, and C-peptide responses were similar (P > 0.05) between treatments, demonstrating no effect of Caf on glucose tolerance. This lack of a Caf effect may be due to the low epinephrine concentration that remained unchanged (P > 0.05) throughout all experiments. Interestingly, the Com exhibited a 50% higher glucose response (P 0.05) lower insulin response (vs. Inc), suggesting a more pronounced glucose intolerance within this subgroup. Furthermore, nine TP (5 Com, 4 Inc) had glucose levels of >or= 7.8 mM at the end of the OGTT (time = 180 min), classifying them as glucose intolerant. In summary, acute Caf ingestion does not increase epinephrine concentration or impair glucose tolerance in TP.     

Glucose tolerance and insulinemia in patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension treated by portacaval anastomosis]

Development of diabetes mellitus is a common complication of side to side porta-caval anastomosis (PCA). Five patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension have been studied with intravehous (IVGTT, 0,5 g/Kg B.W.) and oral (OGTT, 1 g/Kg B.W.) glucose tolerance tests before and three weeks after PCA. Fasting plasma glucose was 84 +/- 7 before and 87 +/- 3 mg/dl after PCA. Fasting IRI increased from 17 +/- 3 to 31 +/- 6 microU/ml. The pattern of plasma glucose and IRI response to IVGTT did not change after PCA. Plasma glucose resonse to OGTT after PCA showed only an earlier rise at 60 instead of 90 minutes, whereas IRI resonse (area under the insulin curve) was significantly enhanced (from 12.4 to 19.8 U/l, p < 0.05). These data suggest a role of gut polipeptides in determining hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistence in PCA patients.     

Basal and dynamic proinsulin-insulin relationship to assess beta-cell function during OGTT in metabolic disorders

The fasting proinsulin-to-insulin ratio is a currently used marker of beta-cell dysfunction. This ratio is calculated at the basal condition, but its behavior in dynamic conditions, i.e., during glucose stimulation, could be more informative. Given the different kinetics of the peptides, a mathematical model was necessary to analyze the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data of insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin in 55 healthy (NGT), 30 impaired glucose-tolerant (IGT), and 31 type 2 diabetic (T2DM) subjects. The model provided for secretion and disappearance of the peptides and an index of beta-cell function under dynamic conditions. Total proinsulin secretion during the OGTT was not different (P > 0.053) among NGT (0.17 +/- 0.01 mmol/l in 3 h), IGT (0.22 +/- 0.02), and T2DM (0.21 +/- 0.02) subjects. The proinsulin-to-insulin molar ratio measured from basal samples was higher (P < 0.0001) in T2DM (0.39 +/- 0.05) than in NGT (0.14 +/- 0.01) and IGT (0.13 +/- 0.02) subjects, and similar results (P < 0.003) were found by the dynamic index (0.27 +/- 0.04, 0.14 +/- 0.01, 0.15 +/- 0.01 in T2DM, NGT, IGT subjects, respectively). The basal ratio significantly correlated with the dynamic index, and the regression line slope was lower than 1 (0.43 +/- 0.08, 0.61 +/- 0.10, and 0.56 +/- 0.03 in NGT, IGT, and T2DM subjects, respectively, P < 0.0001). Impaired beta-cell function in T2DM could then be indicated by proinsulin-to-insulin indexes at both basal and dynamic phases.     

Meal and oral glucose tests for assessment of beta -cell function: modeling analysis in normal subjects

We investigated beta-cell function and its relationship to insulin sensitivity in 17 normal volunteers. For insulin secretion (derived by C-peptide deconvolution), a mathematical model was applied to 24-h triple-meal tests (MT) as well as oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT); insulin sensitivity was assessed by the euglycemic insulin clamp technique. The beta-cell model featured a glucose concentration-insulin secretion dose response (characterized by secretion at 5 mM glucose and slope), a secretion component proportional to the glucose concentration derivative, and a time-dependent potentiation factor (modulating the dose response and accounting for effects of sustained hyperglycemia and incretins). The beta-cell dose-response functions estimated from the whole 24-h MT, the first 2 h of the MT, and the OGTT differed systematically, because a different potentiation factor was involved. In fact, potentiation was higher than average during meals (1.6 +/- 0.1-fold during the first meal) and had a different time course in the MT and OGTT. However, if potentiation was accounted for, the 24- and 2-h MT and the OGTT yielded similar dose responses, and most beta-cell function parameters were intercorrelated (r = 0.50-0.86, P < or = 0.05). The potentiation factor was found to be related to plasma glucose-dependent insulin-releasing polypeptide concentrations (r = 0.49, P < 0.0001). Among beta-cell function parameters, only insulin secretion at 5 mM glucose from MT correlated inversely with insulin sensitivity (24-h MT: r = -0.74, P < 0.001; 2-h MT: r = -0.52, P < 0.05), whereas the dose-response slope and the OGTT parameters did not. In nine other subjects, reproducibility of model parameters was evaluated from repeated MTs. Coefficients of variation were generally approximately 20%, but the derivative component was less reproducible. We conclude that our model for the multiple MT yields useful information on beta-cell function, particularly with regard to the role of potentiation. With cautious interpretation, a 2-h MT or a standard OGTT can be used as surrogates of 24-h tests in assessing spontaneous beta-cell function.     

Factors responsible for glucose intolerance in Japanese subjects with impaired fasting glucose.

Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) represents risk of development of diabetes (DM) and its complications. We investigated insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in 403 IFG subjects divided into three levels of 2-hour postchallenge glucose (2-h PG) to clarify the factors responsible in the development of glucose intolerance in Japanese IFG. Nearly 60% of the subjects at annual medical check-up with FPG of 6.1-7.0 mmol/l at the first screening were diagnosed by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; FPG <7.0 mmol/l and 7.8 mmol/l <2-h PG <11.1 mmol/l) or DM (isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia (IPH); FPG <7.0 mmol/l and 11.1 mmol/l <2-h PG level). The primary factor in the decreased glucose tolerance was a decrease in early-phase insulin, with some contribution of increasing insulin resistance. In addition, IFG/IGT and IFG/IPH subjects showed a compensatory increase in basal insulin secretion sufficient to keep FPG levels within the non-diabetic range. IFG is composed of three different categories in basal, early-phase insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity.     

Blood glucose control in healthy subject and patients receiving intravenous glucose infusion or total parenteral nutrition using glucagon-like peptide 1

AIMS: It was the aim of the study to examine whether the insulinotropic gut hormone GLP-1 is able to control or even normalise glycaemia in healthy subjects receiving intravenous glucose infusions and in severely ill patients hyperglycaemic during total parenteral nutrition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight healthy subjects and nine patients were examined. The volunteers received, in six separate experiments in randomised order, intravenous glucose at doses of 0, 2 and 5mg kg(-1) min(-1), each with intravenous GLP-1 or placebo for 6 h. Patients were selected on the basis of hyperglycaemia (>150 mg/dl) during complete parenteral nutrition with glucose (3.2+/-1.4 mg kg(-1) min(-1)), amino acids (n=8; 0.9+/-0.2 mg kg(-1) min(-1)), with or without lipid emulsions. Four hours (8 a.m. to 12 a.m. on parenteral nutrition plus NaCl as placebo) were compared to 4 h (12 a.m. to 4 p.m.) with additional GLP-1 administered intravenously. The dose of GLP-1 was 1.2 pmol kg(-1) min(-1). Blood was drawn for the determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, GLP-1, glucagon, and free fatty acids. RESULTS: Glycaemia was raised dose-dependently by glucose infusions in healthy volunteers (p<0.0001). GLP-1 ( approximately 100-150 pmol/l) stimulated insulin and reduced glucagon secretion and reduced glucose concentrations into the normoglycaemic fasting range (all p<0.05). In hyperglycaemic patients, glucose concentrations during the placebo period averaged 211+/-24 mg/dl. This level was reduced to 159+/-25 mg/dl with GLP-1 (p<0.0001), accompanied by a rise in insulin (p=0.0002) and C-peptide (p<0.0001), and by trend towards a reduction in glucagon (p=0.08) and free fatty acids (p=0.02). GLP-1 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycaemia during parenteral nutrition can be controlled by exogenous GLP-1, e.g. the natural peptide (available today), whereas the chronic therapy of Type 2 diabetes requires GLP-1 derivatives with longer duration of action.     

Failure of exogenous insulin to inhibit insulin secretion in man

In order to explore whether or not the negative feedback mechanism of insulin per se on insulin secretion exists in man, changes in plasma C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR), as an index of pancreatic B cells secretory function, were studied in 6 nonobese healthy volunteers in the presence of high circulating levels of exogenous insulin. 10% glucose was infused concurrently so as to maintain blood sugar at the basal level. The insulin-glucose infusion was maintained for 120 minutes, achieving mean plasma levels of 140-180 mu1/ml. After this period, the insulin infusion was continued at the same rate for an additional 10 minutes while the glucose was omitted. Despite the elevated level of circulating insulin, no significant change in plasma CPR concentration was observed so long as the blood sugar was maintained at the basal levels. Following cessation of the glucose infusion, the plasma CPR levels declined with a decrease in blood sugar level. Under the conditions of the present study, no inhibitory effect of exogenous insulin on the secretory function of the B cells was noticed.     

Insulin and glucose responses during bed rest with isotonic and isometric exercise

The effects of daily intensive isotonic (68% maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max)) and isometric (21% maximum extension force) leg exercise on plasma insulin and glucose responses to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 14-day bed-rest (BR) periods were investigated in seven young healthy men. The OGTT was given during ambulatory control and on day 10 of the no-exercise, isotonic, and isometric exercise BR periods during the 15-wk study. The subjects were placed on a controlled diet (mean +/- SD = 344 +/- 34 g CHO/day and 3,073 +/- 155 (SD) kcal/day) starting 10 days before each BR period. During BR, basal plasma glucose concentration remained unchanged with no exercise, but increased (P less than 0.05) to 87-89 mg/100 ml with both exercise regimens on day 2, and then fell slightly below control levels on day 13. The fall of glucose content (-11 to -15%) during BR was independent of the exercise regimen and was an adjustment for the loss of plasma vol. The intensity of the response of insulin and glucose to the OGTT (integrated area under the curves) was inversely proportional to the total daily energy expenditure during BR; i.e., the largest response with no exercise, then isometric, isotonic, and ambulatory exercise. It was estimated that at least 1,020 kcal/day must be provided by supplemental exercise to restore the hyperinsulinemia to control levels.     

Plasma beta-endorphin in response to oral glucose tolerance test in obese patients

In order to clarify the possible interaction between endogenous opioids and glucose homeostasis in obesity we studied Beta-Endorphin (B-Ep), ACTH, cortisol and insulin plasma levels in response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in 8 females suffering from uncomplicated obesity and in 6 healthy volunteers of normal weight. Results were evaluated in terms of secretion areas subtracted from basal value. Basal glucose, insulin and B-Ep levels were significantly higher in the obese patients compared to controls, cortisol levels and ACTH were not statistically different between obese and normal subjects. During OGTT total areas of insulin secretion were significantly higher in the obese patients; cortisol, ACTH, B-Ep plasma levels did not change in controls, whereas obese patients showed a response to B-Ep which reached a peak at 60 minutes. The area of B-Ep response to OGTT in obese patients was significantly higher than in controls. On the basis of these results we may suggest that the opioid system belongs to the chain of neuroendocrine and metabolic events responsible for the origin and the growth of overweight. But the possibility exists that obesity itself can enhance the B-Ep secretion above all through overeating. In this regard it is to stress that glucose ingestion induces in obese patients, differently from normal subjects, insulin hypersecretion and the B-Ep secretion, possibly from gastro-enteric tract and/or pancreatic isles.