Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) gene polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aims to examine whether the genotype status of MspI, Ile462Val, and Thr461Asn polymorphisms in Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) is associated with ovarian cancer risk. Eligible case-control studies were identified through search in MEDLINE (end of search: October 2010). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were appropriately derived from fixed effects or random effects models. Concerning MspI polymorphism, seven studies were eligible (1,051 cases and 1,613 controls); 11 studies were eligible (1,680 cases and 3,345 controls) for Ile462Val and three studies were eligible (349 cases and 785 controls) for Thr461Asn. Ile462Val polymorphism seemed to confer elevated ovarian cancer risk concerning homozygous carriers (pooled OR?=?2.65, 95?% CI: 1.40-5.03, p?=?0.003, fixed effects), as well as at the recessive model (pooled OR?=?2.10, 95?% CI: 1.13-3.92, p?=?0.020, fixed effects); these findings were replicated upon Caucasian subjects. MspI polymorphism was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (for heterozygous TC vs TT carriers pooled OR?=?1.10, 95?% CI: 0.91-1.34, p?=?0.329, fixed effects; for homozygous CC vs. TT carriers pooled OR?=?1.11, 95?% CI: 0.65-1.90, p?=?0.693, fixed effects). With respect to Thr461Asn polymorphism a finding of borderline statistical significance emerged, pointing to marginally elevated ovarian cancer risk in heterozygous Thr/Asn carriers (pooled OR?=?1.62, 95?% CI: 0.97-2.70, p?=?0.066, fixed effects), but not in homozygous Asn/Asn carriers (pooled OR?=?1.40, 95?% CI: 0.18-10.89, p?=?0.749, fixed effects). Ile462Val status seems to represent a meaningful risk factor for ovarian cancer in Caucasians. Additional case-control studies of high methodological quality are needed in order to further substantiate and enrich the present findings. Special attention should be paid upon the design of future studies; Asian and African populations should represent points of focus.     

Association between CYP1A1 Ile462Val Variation and Acute Leukemia Risk: Meta-Analyses Including 2164 Cases and 4160 Controls

Background

Previously, CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism has been indicated to be a risk factor for several malignancies. Increasing reports have focused on the association of CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphisms with susceptibility to acute leukemia and have generated controversial results. The goal of the present study was to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship.

Methods

Relevant literature has been rigorously searched and screened. Eligible studies were identified for the period up to Apr 2012. Meta-analyses evaluating the association of CYP1A1 Ile462Val variation with acute leukemia were carried out. Subgroup analyses on ethnicity, clinical types and source of controls were further performed.

Results

A total of thirteen publications including fourteen case-control studies with 2164 cases and 4160 controls were selected for analysis. The overall data indicated a significant association of CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism with acute leukemia risk (Val/Val vs Ile/Ile OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.11–1.98; dominant model: OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.05–1.51; recessive model: OR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.04–1.83). In subgroup analysis on ethnicity, increased risk was shown among mixed ethnicities (Val/Val vs Ile/Ile: OR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.46–3.82; dominant model: OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.01–1.86; recessive model: OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.37–3.53) but not Asians or Caucasians. In subgroup analysis on clinical types, increased risk was observed in the acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) subgroup (Val/Val vs Ile/Ile: OR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.42–3.01; recessive model: OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.32–2.76) but not in the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subgroup.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism might be a low-penetrant risk factor for acute leukemia. Subgroup analyses suggest that homozygous Val/Val alleles might modify the susceptibility to ALL.     

MspI and Ile462Val Polymorphisms in CYP1A1 and Overall Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) is a member of the CYP1 family, which is a key enzyme in the metabolism of many endogenous substrates and exogenous carcinogens. To date, many studies have examined the association between CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val polymorphisms and cancer risk in various populations, but their results have been conflicting rather than consistent.

Methods

To assess this relationship more precisely, a meta-analysis based on 198 publications was performed. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association. The statistical heterogeneity across studies was examined with a chi-square-based Q-test.

Results

Overall, a significant elevated risk of cancer was associated with CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val polymorphisms for all genetic models studied. Further stratified analysis by cancer types revealed that the MspI polymorphism may increase the risk of lung cancer and cervical cancer whereas the Ile462Val polymorphism may contribute to a higher risk of lung cancer, leukemia, esophageal carcinoma, and prostate cancer. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, obvious associations were found in the Asian population for the MspI polymorphism while an increased risk of cancer was observed in Asians and Caucasians for the Ile462Val polymorphism.

Conclusions

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val polymorphisms contribute to increased cancer susceptibility among Asians. Additional comprehensive system analyses are required to validate this association and other related polymorphisms.     

CYP1A1 Ile462Val is a risk factor for ovarian cancer development

Published data on the association between CYP1A1 gene polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk are conflicting and heterogeneous. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed for heterozygous, homozygous, dominant model, recessive model and allele, respectively. A total of 15 case-control studies were identified, among which, 13 studies (1815 cases and 3501 controls) were eligible for CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val and nine studies (2495 cases and 3553 controls) were eligible for CYP1A1 Msp1. Overall, Ile(462)Val was significantly associated with ovarian cancer, with homozygous carriers (Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR=2.64; 95% CI: 1.63-4.28) and recessive model (Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile and Ile/Val: OR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.45-3.65) being risk factors for ovarian cancer development. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found for Caucasians (homozygous carriers: OR=4.91; 95% CI: 2.07-11.66; recessive model: OR=3.26; 95% CI: 1.41-7.50) and Asians (homozygous carriers: OR=3.06; 95% CI: 1.48-6.33; recessive model: OR=2.75; 95% CI: 1.40-5.41; Val allele: OR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.19-2.35). However, no significant associations were found between Msp1 and ovarian cancer in the overall analyses or the subgroup analyses by ethnicity. This meta-analysis denotes the importance for in-depth research regarding of gene-gene, gene-environment interactions, race-specific and histological subtypes specific to obtain a more conclusive response about the function of CYP1A1 in ovarian cancer.     

Association between ATM polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene polymorphisms and cancer risk, including lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma and pancreatic cancer. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. We aimed to examine the associations between two SNPs (rs664143 and rs664677) and cancer risk by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 12 publications were included in this meta-analysis, 8 for rs664143 and 7 for rs664677. Overall, rs664143 heterozygote carriers turned out to be associated with cancer risk (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02–1.36). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed that the ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.18–1.85, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.93) and rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancr risk and increased breast cancer risk (for lung cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.92, CC vs. TT: OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99 and for breast cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.73, CC vs. TT: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.21–1.87). In the subgroup analysis by region, we also observed that individuals with ATM rs664143 GA or AA genotype had an obvious increased cancer risk among Asian people (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16–1.62). In conclusion, ATM rs664143 polymorphism was associated with cancer susceptibility. ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk. ATM rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancer risk as well as increased breast cancer risk.     

CDH1 promoter polymorphism and stomach cancer susceptibility

The relationship of stomach cancer susceptibility and the presence of E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter −160 C/A polymorphism had been reported with conflicting results. To further explore the association of this polymorphism with stomach cancer susceptibility, we performed an extensive search of relevant studies and carried out a meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimate. A total of 16 studies including 2,611 cases and 3,788 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between CDH1 −160 C/A polymorphism and stomach cancer risk (CA vs. CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.19; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.75–1.46; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86–1.20; recessive model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41). When subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, the A-allele carriers conferred a decreased stomach cancer risk in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96; dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99), but no statistically significant association was found in Caucasians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 −160 A-allele may play a protective role of stomach cancer development in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Interactions between <Emphasis Type="Italic">CYP1A1</Emphasis> polymorphisms and cigarette smoking are associated with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from epidemiological studies

The Cytochrome P-450 1A1 (CYP1A1) gene has been implicated in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results have been inconsistent. In this study, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the associations of polymorphisms in CYP1A1 gene with HCC risk. Published literature from PubMed, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang Data were retrieved. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Eight studies (1,752 cases and 2,279 controls) for Ile-Val polymorphism and eight studies (933 cases and 1,449 controls) for MspI polymorphism were identified. The results showed that there was no statistically significant association between the Ile-Val polymorphism and HCC risk under all genetic models (co-dominant model: Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.96-2.72 and Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.52; dominant model: OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.92-1.70; recessive model: OR = 1.48, 95% CI 0.99-2.21). The MspI polymorphism was also not associated with HCC risk (co-dominant model: m2m2 vs. m1m1: OR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.42 and m1m2 vs. m1m1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.61; dominant model: OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.99–1.45; recessive model: OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.18). However, the significant associations were found between both the Ile–Val and MspI polymorphisms and HCC risk among the cigarette smoking subjects (Ile-Val: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85; MspI: OR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.47-4.77). The present meta-analysis indicated that the MspI and Ile-Val polymorphisms of CYP1A1 may play important roles in increasing susceptibility to smoking-related HCC.     

CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism contributes to oral cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Previous data on association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk were controversial. To investigate the association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between oral cancer and genotype with English language until June 2010. Twelve published case–control studies of 1259 patients with oral cancer and 2262 controls were acquired. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association in codominant and dominant models. Overall, the pooled ORs indicated a significant association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.04–1.62, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.57; for (c1/c2 + c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.07–1.64, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.57, respectively). In subgroup analysis by race, the same significant risks were found among Asian (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.05–1.91, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.92; for (c1/c2 + c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.08–1.88, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.97, respectively). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I c2 allele may be a biomarker for oral cancer, especially among Asian populations.     

CYP1A1 Ile462Val Polymorphism Contributes to Lung Cancer Susceptibility among Lung Squamous Carcinoma and Smokers: A Meta-Analysis

Many studies have examined the association between the CYP1A1 Ile462Val gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in various populations, but their results have been inconsistent. To assess this relationship more precisely, a meta-analysis was performed. Ultimately, 43 case-control studies, comprising 19,228 subjects were included. A significantly elevated lung cancer risk was associated with 2 Ile462Val genotype variants (for Val/Val vs Ile/Ile: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.08–1.40; for (Ile/Val +Val/Val) vs Ile/Ile: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07–1.23) in overall population. In the stratified analysis, a significant association was found in Asians, Caucasians and lung SCC, not lung AC and lung SCLC. Additionally, a significant association was found in smoker population and not found in non-smoker populations. This meta-analysis suggests that the Ile462Val polymorphisms of CYP1A1 correlate with increased lung cancer susceptibility in Asian and Caucasian populations and there is an interaction with smoking status, but these associations vary in different histological types of lung caner.     

Association of a LSP1 gene rs3817198T>C polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls

Published data on the association between lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the LSP1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of the association between the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. A total of seven eligible studies including 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The distributions of genotypes in the controls were all in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We observed that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism was significantly correlated with breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.08; the homozygote codominant: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.28). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significant association was observed in Caucasians for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03–1.52) and for the recessive model (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02–1.47). There was significant association observed in Africans for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22–0.92) and for the recessive model (OR = 0.43; 95% CI=0.22–0.88). Also, significant association was observed in mixed ethnicities for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in nested case–control studies (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). But no significant association was observed for all comparison models between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in hospital-based and people-based studies. When stratified by BRCA1 mutation carriers status, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in this meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14; the dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). And significant association was found in the BRCA2 mutation carriers in the allele contrast (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20), the homozygote codominant (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04–1.47), the heterozygote codominant (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.25) and the dominant models (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27). There was significant association between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive cohort in all comparison models (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.16; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17; the recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer but may not be in Africans.     

Combined analysis of the association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms and cancer risk

P73 is a structural and functional homologue of p53, and plays an important role in regulating cell cycle and apoptosis. A potentially functional polymorphism (designated as p73 G4C14-to-A4T14) has been identified in a region in exon 2 of the p73 gene, which may theoretically form a stem-loop structure and thereby affect p73 expression. Several investigations have reported the correlation between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk. However, the results are inconclusive. To further assess the association between p73 polymorphism and cancer risk, we performed meta-analysis of the data sets obtained from 26 individual studies involving 8,148 cancer patients and 8,150 controls. The association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk was determined by crude odd ratios (OR) with 95% CI (confidential interval). AT-allele carriers were found to have a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.14–2.33; AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.05–2.10), colorectal cancer (AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.25–3.12), head and neck cancer (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06–1.96) and other cancers (AT/AT vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.24–2.57; AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26–2.56). In the stratified analysis of ethnicity, a significantly elevated cancer risk was found in Caucasians (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08–1.30; allele AT vs. allele GC, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06–1.24). No significant association of p73 polymorphism with the cancer risk of smoking was detected by stratified analysis by smoking status. Together, our data suggest that the p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 may be a risk factor of cancer especially in Caucasians.     

GSTP1 Ile105Val Polymorphism and Prostate Cancer Risk: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Background

Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is thought to be involved in the detoxification of reactive carcinogen metabolites. Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with the risk of prostate cancer. However, the results remain inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation, a meta-analysis was performed.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the relationship. The overall association was not significant (Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.90–1.25, P = 0.50; Val/Val vs. Val/Ile+Ile/Ile: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.91–1.25, P = 0.44). In subgroup analyses by ethnicity and prostate cancer grade, the similar results were observed. However, in stratified analysis by clinical stage, we found a significant association with low-stage prostate cancer (Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.73–4.22, P<0.001; Val/Val vs. Val/Ile+Ile/Ile: OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.38–3.33, P = 0.001). Moreover, there was no statistically significant evidence of multiplicative interactions neither between the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and GSTM1, nor between smoking status and GSTP1 on prostate cancer risk.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism might not be significantly associated with overall prostate cancer risk. Further stratified analyses showed a significant association with low-stage prostate cancer.     

Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis comprising 9,911 cases and 11,171 controls

Cyclin D1 represents a key molecule in the regulation of cell cycle. CCND1 G870A (rs603965) polymorphism has drawn considerable attention as the A allele may generate a variant splice product with possible oncogenic actions. A meta-analysis examining the association between CCND1 G870A polymorphism and breast cancer risk was performed. Separate analyses on Caucasian and Chinese populations were also implemented. Eligible articles were identified for the period up to July 2010. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were appropriately derived from fixed-effects or random-effects models. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies whose genotype frequencies in controls significantly deviated from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was performed. Nine case–control studies on Caucasians (7,304 cases and 8,149 controls) and four case–control studies on Chinese (2,607 cases and 3,022 controls) were eligible. At the overall analysis the A allele seemed to be associated with elevated breast cancer risk; the effect seemed to be confined to homozygous carriers (pooled OR = 1.091, 95% CI: 1.008–1.179, P = 0.030, fixed effects) as heterozygous carriers did not exhibit significantly elevated breast cancer risk. No statistically significant associations were demonstrated in Caucasians. On the other hand, Chinese AA carriers exhibited marginally elevated breast cancer risk (pooled OR = 1.144, 95% CI: 0.984–1.329, P = 0.080, fixed effects). Nevertheless, the controls in two out of the four Chinese studies deviated from HWE. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the A allele of the CCND1 G870A polymorphism may confer additional breast cancer risk when it comes to homozygosity and Chinese populations. The need for additional, methodologically sound studies on Chinese populations seems warranted.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TGFBR1</Emphasis>*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03–1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01–1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01–1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00–1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03–5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.     

Differential effects of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) polymorphisms on cancer risk: evidence from 25 published studies

Paraoxonase is an HDL-associated enzyme that plays a preventive role against oxidative stress, which is thought to contribute to cancer development. PON1 activity varies widely among individuals, which is in part related to two common nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the PON1 gene (Q192R and L55M). The polymorphisms in PON1 have been implicated in cancer risk. However, results from the studies to date have been conflicting. To clarify the association, a meta-analysis was performed for 7,073 cases and 9,520 controls from 25 published case–control studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Significant associations between PON1-L55M but not Q192R polymorphism and total cancer were observed from all the comparisons. In stratified analyses, PON1-55M allele was a risk factor for breast cancer. Similarly, increased risk was observed for prostate cancer (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01–1.36, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.260) and Caucasian population (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.38, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.1) of the LM genotype, compared with the LL genotype. For PON1-Q192R polymorphism, PON1-192R allele was a decreased risk factor for cancer in the Asian group (RR vs QQ: OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38–0.98, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.268; QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.130; RR + QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53–0.95, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.135). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggests that the PON1-55M allele is a risk factor for the development of cancer, in particular for breast cancer. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to further evaluate these associations.     

Survivin promoter ?31G/C (rs9904341) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess the association of survivin −31 G/C promoter polymorphism and cancer risk. Thirteen case–control studies identified through PubMed and published between 2007 and 2011 with a total of 3329 cancer cases and 3979 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to investigate the strength of the association. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that survivin −31C allele was associated with 1.27 fold increased risk of cancer compared with the −31G allele (95% CI = 1.091–1.479; random model). Subgroup analyses based on type of cancer and ethnicity were also performed, and results indicated that survivin −31G/C polymorphism was not associated with risk of gastric cancer [OR = 2.879; 95% CI = 0.553–15.004) for CC vs.GG] and esophageal cancer [OR = 1.352; 95% CI = 0.494–3.699) for CC vs.GG]. Stratification on the basis of ethnicity showed that the risk due to −31C allele was significant only in Asian population [OR = 1.894; 95% CI = 1.206–2.974 for CC vs.GG]. The present meta-analysis suggests an important role of survivin −31 G/C polymorphism with cancer risk especially in Asian population. However, further studies with larger sample size are required to draw more comprehensive conclusions and provide more precise evidence in individual cancers.     

Meta-analyses of the effect of cytochrome P450 2E1 gene polymorphism on the risk of head and neck cancer

Many studies have investigated the association between the CYP2E1 5′-flanking region (RsaI/PstI) polymorphism and head and neck cancer susceptibility, but the results were conflicting. In this meta-analysis, we assessed 24 published studies involving 12,562 subjects of the association between CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk. Using the fixed effects model, we found significant association between PstI/RsaI polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk [OR = 1.11 (95%CI: 1.00–1.22) for c2 allele (P = 0.04) and OR = 1.57 (95% CI: 1.14–2.15) for c2 homozygous (P = 0.006) compared with wild type homozygote]. Significant results were also found in East Asians and Mix populations when stratified by ethnicity. However, no significant associations were found for Caucasians in all genetic models. Stratified analyses according to source of controls, significant associations were found only in hospital base controls. In the subgroup analyses by tumor types, significant association was detected only in oral cancer group, while no significant associations among laryngeal- or pharyngeal- cancer subgroup. This meta-analysis suggests that the CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism may be a risk factor for head and neck cancer in Asians and Mix population, and that different carcinogenic processes involved in the genesis of various tumor types may exist.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) participates in modulating recognition of DNA damage during the DNA nucleotide excision repair process. The XPA A23G polymorphism has been investigated in case–control studies to evaluate the cancer risk attributed to the variant, but the results were conflicting. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G polymorphism in cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 30 published case–control studies. Overall, no significant association of XPA A23G variant with cancer susceptibility was observed for any genetic model. However, significant association was observed for colorectal cancer (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.15–2.44; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), for breast cancer an increased but non-significant risk was found (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.66; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.99–1.63), and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38), whereas for lung cancer a significant reduced risk was observed (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66–0.90; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.87), it’s noting that in Asian population the inverse association was more apparent. In addition, in Asian population for esophageal cancer a significant decreased risk was also found in dominant genetic model (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43–0.70) and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in dominant genetic model (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23). The meta-analysis suggested that the XPA A23G G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

Has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 19 case–control studies

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk. However, published data are still inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer susceptibility until May 8, 2010. Nineteen published case–control studies including a total of 10,496 cases and 12,885 controls were acquired. Overall, Increased cancer risk was found in domain model (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03–1.35) rather than in other genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Stratified analysis shown that significant association between rs2910164 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility was present in Asians (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01–1.29 for CG vs. CC; OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03–1.39 for GG + CG vs. CC), but not in Caucasian populations. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, no significantly increased risk of breast, gastric, prostate or bladder cancer were found in any of the genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) is associated with increased cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, further well-designed studies with large sample size will be necessary to validate the risk identified in the current meta-analysis.     

A genetic variant in microRNA-196a2 is associated with increased cancer risk: a meta-analysis

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules that function as negative regulators of gene expression. Common genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) in miRNA genes may alter their expression or maturation resulting in varied functional consequences. Until now, several studies had evaluated the association between the polymorphisms in the hsa-miR-196a2 rs11614913 and cancer risk in diverse populations and in multiple types of cancer, with contradictory outcomes. Therefore, here we performed a meta-analysis to address the association between this polymorphism and cancer risk. A total of nine studies involving 6,540 cases and 7,562 controls were retrieved based on PubMed. Our analysis demonstrated that hsa-miR-196a2 rs11614913 CC genotype significantly increased the cancer risk in homozygote comparison model compared to TT genotype (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01–1.68). Moreover, significant association of this polymorphism with breast cancer was found based on homozygote comparison model (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01–1.26) and dominant model (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01–1.23). In addition, hsa-miR-196a2 rs11614913 CC genotype was significantly associated with cancer risk in Chinese and Indian (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05–1.40), but not in Caucasians (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89–1.19). Taken together, our results indicate that the polymorphism of hsa-miR-196a2 rs11614913 is associated with cancer susceptibility, especially with breast cancer and in Chinese and Indian populations.